Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of EPA Comments
Note: EPA no longer updates this information, but it may be useful as a reference or resource.
[Federal Register: May 16, 2003 (Volume 68, Number 95)]
[Notices]
[Page 26605-26606]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr16my03-82]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[ER-FRL-6640-3]
Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of
EPA Comments
Availability of EPA comments prepared pursuant to the Environmental
ReviewProcess (ERP), under section 309 of the Clean Air Act and section
102(2)(c) of the National Environmental Policy Act as amended. Requests
for copies of EPA comments can be directed to the Office of Federal
Activities at (202) 564-7167. An explanation of the ratings assigned to
draft environmental impact statements (EISs) was published in the
Federal Register dated April 1, 2003 (68 FR 16511).
Draft EISs
ERP No. D-COE-E32180-FL Rating EC1, Miami Harbor Navigation
Improvements Project to Study the Feasibility of Widening and Deepening
Portions of the Port, Miami-Dade County, FL.
Summary: EPA expressed some environmental concerns about the
unavoidable project impacts to sensitive biological resources, but
concluded the proposed mitigation plan should adequately address these
losses in the long-term.
ERP No. D-FHW-H40178-MO Rating EC2, I-64/US 40 Corridor,
Reconstruction of the existing I-64/US 40 Facility with New Interchange
Configurations and Roadway, Funding, City of St.Louis, St. Louis
County, MO.
Summary: EPA has environmental concerns regarding the proposed
project on the basis of the degree of information provided to ensure
compliance with section 4(f). EPA requests that consultation with the
State HistoricalPreservation Officer (SHPO) be undertaken to identify
appropriate mitigation measures for the properties that will be
adversely impacted if the preferred alternative is selected. EPA also
requests that identified Environmental Justice communities be evaluated
for opportunities to reduce cumulative environmental and human health
burdens through project implementation.
ERP No. D-NRC-H06005-NE Rating EC2, GENERIC EIS--Fort Calhoun
Station, Unit 1, Renewal of the Operating Licenses (OLs) for an
Additional 20 Years, Supplement 12 (NUREG-1437)Omaha Public Power
District, Washington County, NE.
Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns with the proposed re-
licensing on the basis of the long (10 year) lead time before the
current license expires. EPA recommended that the NRC improve
cumulative effects information on current and future heat contributors
to the Missouri River, and that NRC detail possible cooling strategies
if faced with limited Missouri River assimilative capacity (heat) in
the future.
ERP No. DS-AFS-L65300-ID Rating LO, Goose Creek Watershed Project,
Reviewing and Updating Information on the Pileated Woodpecker and Soil
Impacts, Payette National Forest, New Meadows Ranger District, Adams
County, ID.
Summary: EPA has no concerns with the proposed action; however, EPA
suggests including information on the potential cumulative effects of 5
other proposed timber sale projects on pileated woodpecker habitat
within the National Forest.
ERP No. DS-AFS-L65325-ID Rating LO, Sloan-Kennally Timber Sale
Project, Reviewing and Updating Information on the Pileated Woodpecker
and Soil Impacts, Payette National Forest, McCallRanger District, Adams
County, ID.
Summary: EPA has no significant concerns with the proposed action;
however, EPA suggests including information on the potential cumulative
effects of 5 other proposed timber sale projects on pileated woodpecker
habitat within the National Forest.
ERP No. DS-AFS-L65336-ID Rating LO, Brown Creek Timber Sale
Project, Reviewing and Updating Information on the Pileated Woodpecker
and Soil Impacts, Payette National Forest, New Meadow Ranger District,
Adams County, ID.
Summary: EPA expressed no concerns with the proposed action;
however, EPA suggests including information on the potential cumulative
effects of 5 other proposed projects on pileated woodpecker habitat
within the National Forest.
ERP No. DS-AFS-L65346-ID Rating LO, Middle Fork Weiser River
Watershed Project, Reviewing and Updating Information on the Pileated
Woodpecker and Soil Impacts, Payette National Forest, Council Ranger
District, Adams County, ID.
Summary: EPA has no concerns with the proposed action; however, EPA
suggests including information on the
[[Page 26606]]
potential cumulative effects of 5 other proposed timber sale projects
on pileated woodpecker habitat within the National Forest.
ERP No. DS-AFS-L65379-ID Rating LO, Little Weiser Landscape
Vegetation Management Project, Reviewing and Updating Information on
the Pileated Woodpecker and Soil Impacts, Payette National Forest,
Adams County, ID.
Summary: EPA has no concerns with the proposed action; however, EPA
suggests including information on the potential cumulative effects of 5
other proposed timber sale projects on pileated woodpecker habitat
within the National Forest.
Final EISs
ERP No. F-BLM-G65083-NM Farmington Resource Management Plan,
Implementation, Managing Public Lands within the Farmington Field
Office (FF0) Boundaries and Federal Oil and Gas Resources within the
New Mexico Portion of San Juan Basin, San Juan, McKinley, Rio Arriba
and Sandoval Counties, NM.
Summary: EPA's comments on air quality impacts and mitigation have
been addressed with additional air quality analysis and assurance that
the NMAQB air permitting program will minimize air quality impacts. The
FourCorners Ozone Task Force will offer future recommendations to BLM
for consideration in the plan.
ERP No. F-FHW-E40788-AL Memphis to Atlanta Corridor Construction,
I-65 in North Central Alabama eastward to the Georgia State Line, U.S.
Army COE Section 404, U.S. Coast Guard and NPDES Permits, Limestone,
Morgan, Madison, Jackson, Marshall, DeKalb and CherokeeCounties, AL.
Summary: EPA continues to have environmental concerns with the
proposed project regarding impacts to wetlands and aquatic resources,
storm water, noise, relocations and other natural habitat impacts. EPA
recommends that tangible minimization and/or mitigation commitments for
these impacts be developed and implemented.
ERP No. F-FHW-E40789-MS East Harrison County Connector
Construction, I-10 to U.S. 90, Funding, U.S. Army COE and US Coast
Guard Permits Issuance and Possible Transfer of Federal Lands, Harrison
County, MS.
Summary: EPA continues to have environmental concerns with impacts
arising from the proposed project relating to noise, floodplains,
wetlands and historic properties. EPA wishes to reiterate the
importance of MDOT and FHWA's commitment to provide wetland and noise
mitigation for impacts attributable to the proposed project.
ERP No. F-FHW-H40170-MO US 50 East-Central Corridor Highway
Improvements, US 50 to US 63 east of Jefferson City, Funding and Major
Transportation Investment Analysis, Osage, Gasconade and Franklin
Counties, MO.
Summary: The FEIS adequately supplements information needs and
addresses the concerns that EPA had expressed in the review of the DEIS
for this project. Consequently, EPA has no objections.
ERP No. F-FHW-K40245-CA CA-78/111 Brawley Bypass, Construction of
an Expressway from CA-86 to CA-111, City of Brawley, Funding, Imperial
County, CA.
Summary: EPA has continuing environmental concerns about air
quality impacts arising from the proposed project, particularly
regarding PM-10. EPA supports the commitment to offset the loss of
prime farmland from the project by purchasing conservation easements.
EPA requests that unresolved air quality issues and mitigation for
farmland impacts be addressed in the Record of Decision.
ERP No. F-NPS-D61054-VA Jamestown Project, Improvements at the
Jamestown Unit of Colonial National Park and the JamestownNational
Historic Site, Implementation, James City County, VA.
Summary: EPA expressed lack of objections with the proposed action.
ERP No. F-SFW-G91002-NM Rio Grande Silvery Minnow (Hybognathus
amarus) Critical Habitat Designation, Implementation, Bernalillo,
Sandoval, Socorro and Valencia Counties, NM.
Summary: EPA has no objection to the selection of the preferred
plan of action. EPA's comments on the Draft EIS were addressed.
Dated: May 13, 2003.
Joseph C. Montgomery,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 03-12350 Filed 5-15-03; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![[logo] US EPA](http://www.epa.gov/epafiles/images/logo_epaseal.gif)