![[logo] US EPA](http://www.epa.gov/epafiles/images/logo_epaseal.gif){kind=logo}
Maryland Regulatory Program
Note: EPA no longer updates this information, but it may be useful as a reference or resource.
[Federal Register: October 27, 2003 (Volume 68, Number 207)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 61172-61175]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr27oc03-25]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
30 CFR Part 920
[MD-051-FOR]
Maryland Regulatory Program
AGENCY: Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM),
Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule; public comment period and opportunity for public
hearing on proposed amendments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are announcing receipt of a proposed amendment to the
Maryland regulatory program under the Surface Mining Control and
Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA or the Act). The program amendment
consists of changes to the Code of Maryland Regulations (COMAR) to
incorporate various changes related to: augering, lands eligible for
remining, required written findings, and topsoil handling.
DATES: We will accept written comments on this amendment until 4 p.m.
(local time), on November 26, 2003. If requested, we will hold a public
hearing on the amendment on November 21, 2003. We will accept requests
to speak at a hearing until 4 p.m. (local time), on November 12, 2003.
ADDRESSES: You should mail or hand-deliver written comments and
requests to speak at the hearing to Mr. George Rieger, at the address
listed below.
You may review copies of the Maryland program, this amendment, a
listing of any scheduled public hearings, and all written comments
received in response to this document at the addresses listed below
during normal business hours, Monday through Friday, excluding
holidays. You may receive one free copy of the amendment by contacting
the Appalachian Regional Coordinating Center.
Mr. George Rieger, Field Office Director, Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement, Appalachian Regional Coordinating Center,
3 Parkway Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15220, (412) 937-2153.
Mr. C. Edmon Larrimore, Program Manager, Mining Program, 1800
Washington Boulevard, Baltimore, Maryland 21230, (410) 537-3000, or 1-
800-633-6101.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. George Rieger, Telephone: (412)
937-2153. Internet: grieger@osmre.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background on the Maryland Program
II. Description of the Proposed Amendment
III. Public Comment Procedures
IV. Procedural Determinations
I. Background on the Maryland Program
Section 503(a) of the Act permits a State to assume primacy for the
regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation operations on non-
Federal and non-Indian lands within its borders by demonstrating that
its State program includes, among other things, ``a State law which
provides for the regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation
operations in accordance with the requirements of the Act * * *; and
rules and regulations consistent with regulations issued by the
Secretary pursuant to the Act.'' See 30 U.S.C. 1253(a)(1) and (7). On
the basis of these criteria, the Secretary of the Interior
conditionally approved the Maryland program on December 1, 1980. You
can find background information on the Maryland program, including the
Secretary's findings, the disposition of comments, and conditions of
approval in the December 1, 1980, Federal Register (45 FR 79431). You
can also find later actions concerning Maryland's program and program
amendments at 30 CFR 920.12, 920.15 and 920.16.
II. Description of the Proposed Amendment
By letter dated September 16, 2003, Maryland sent us a proposed
amendment to its program (Administrative Record Number MD-585-00) under
SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1201 et seq.). Maryland sent the amendment to include
changes made at its own initiative.
[[Page 61173]]
The provisions of COMAR that Maryland proposes to revise are as
follows: COMAR, 26.20.03.07 Augering, A. and B., 26.20.03.11 Lands
Eligible for Remining, A., B., (1), (2), C., and D., 26.20.05.01
Required Written Findings, A., B., C., L., (1), (2), and (3), and
26.20.25.02 Topsoil Handling D. The specific amendments to COMAR are
identified below.
26.20.03.07 Augering.
Maryland proposes to recode the first section A. and add section B.
which states `` No permit shall be issued for any augering operations
unless the Bureau finds, in writing, that the operation meets all other
requirements of this subtitle and will be conducted in compliance with
COMAR 26.20.24.01''.
26.20.03.11 Lands Eligible for Remining.
Maryland proposes to add sections which state:
A. This regulation applies to any person who conducts or intends to
conduct a surface coal mining operation on lands eligible for remining.
B. Any application for a permit under this regulation shall be made
according to all requirements of this subtitle applicable to surface
coal mining and reclamation operations. In addition, the application
shall:
(1) To the extent not otherwise addressed in the permit
application, identify potential environmental and safety problems
related to prior mining activities at the site that could be reasonably
anticipated to occur; and
(2) With regard to potential environmental and safety problems
referred to in section B(1) of this regulation, describe the mitigative
measures that will be taken to ensure that the applicable reclamation
requirements of the Regulatory Program can be met.
C. The identification of the environmental and safety problems
required under section B(1) of this regulation shall include visual
observations at the site, a record review of past mining at the site,
and environmental sampling tailored to current site conditions.
D. The requirements of the regulation shall not apply after
September 30, 2004.
26.20.05.01 Required Written Findings.
``A, and may not'' are deleted and this section is revised to read,
``No permit application or application for a significant revision of a
permit shall be approved unless the application affirmatively
demonstrates and the Bureau finds, in writing, on the basis of
information set forth in the application, or information otherwise
available and documented in the approval under COMAR 26.20.04.11 A.,
the following:''
A. ``Complies'' is deleted and this section now reads, ``The permit
application is complete and accurate and the applicant has complied
with all requirements of the Regulatory Program;''
B. The words ``Surface coal mining and'' as well as ``mining and''
are deleted and the section is revised to read, ``The applicant has
demonstrated that reclamation operations, as required by the Regulatory
Program, can be feasibly accomplished under the reclamation plan
contained in the application;''
C. The phrases ``has been made an'' and ``have been made'' have
been deleted and the section now reads, ``The Bureau has made an
assessment of the probable cumulative impacts of all anticipated coal
mining in the cumulative impact area on the hydrologic balance and has
determined that the operations proposed under the application have been
designed to prevent material damage to the hydrologic balance outside
the proposed permit area;''
D.-K. (text unchanged)
L. The sentence, ``The activities are conducted so as to reasonably
maximize the use of coal, while using the best appropriate technology
currently available to maintain environmental integrity, so that the
probability of re-affecting the land in the future by strip or
underground mining operations is minimized.'' is deleted and the
section is revised to read, ``For permits issued under COMAR
26.20.03.11, the permit application must contain:''
(1) Land eligible for remining;
(2) An identification of the potential environmental and safety
problems related to the prior mining activities which could reasonably
be anticipated to occur at the site; and
(3) Mitigation plans to sufficiently address these potential
environmental safety problems so that reclamation as required by the
applicable requirements of the Regulatory Program can be accomplished.
26.20.25.02 Topsoil Handling.
A.-C. (text unchanged)
D. The word ``Topsoil'', the phrase ``in the amounts determined by
soil tests'', and the fragment and sentence ``surface soil layer so
that it supports the approved post mining land use and meets the
revegetative requirements. All soil tests shall be performed by a
qualified laboratory or person using standard methods approved by the
bureau.'' all have been deleted. The section now reads as follows:
Nutrients and Soil Amendments.
Nutrients and soil amendments shall be applied to the initially
redistributed material when necessary to establish the vegetative
cover.
III. Public Comment Procedures
Under the provisions of 30 CFR 732.17(h), we are seeking your
comments on whether the amendment satisfies the applicable program
approval criteria of 30 CFR 732.15. If we approve the amendment, it
will become part of the Maryland program.
Written Comments
Send your written or electronic comments to OSM at the address
given above. Your written comments should be specific, pertain only to
the issues proposed in this rulemaking, and include explanations in
support of your recommendations. We may not consider or respond to your
comments when developing the final rule if they are received after the
close of the comment period (see DATES). We will make every attempt to
log all comments into the administrative record, but comments delivered
to an address other than the Appalachian Regional Coordinating Center
may not be logged in.
Electronic Comments
Please submit Internet comments as an ASCII, Word file avoiding the
use of special characters and any form of encryption. Please also
include ``Attn: SATS NO. MD-051-FOR'' and your name and return address
in your Internet message. If you do not receive a confirmation that we
have received your Internet message, contact the Appalachian Regional
Coordinating Center at (412) 937-2153.
Availability of Comments
We will make comments, including names and addresses of
respondents, available for public review during normal business hours.
We will not consider anonymous comments. If individual respondents
request confidentiality, we will honor their request to the extent
allowable by law. Individual respondents who wish to withhold their
name or address from public review, except for the city or town, must
state this prominently at the beginning of their comments. We will make
all submissions from organizations or businesses, and from individuals
identifying themselves as representatives or officials of organizations
or businesses, available for public inspection in their entirety.
Public Hearing
If you wish to speak at the public hearing, contact the person
listed under
[[Page 61174]]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT by 4 p.m. (local time), on November 12,
2003. If you are disabled and need special accommodations to attend a
public hearing, contact the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT. We will arrange the location and time of the hearing with
those persons requesting the hearing. If no one requests an opportunity
to speak, we will not hold a hearing.
To assist the transcriber and ensure an accurate record, we
request, if possible, that each person who speaks at the public hearing
provide us with a written copy of his or her comments. The public
hearing will continue on the specified date until everyone scheduled to
speak has been given an opportunity to be heard. If you are in the
audience and have not been scheduled to speak and wish to do so, you
will be allowed to speak after those who have been scheduled. We will
end the hearing after everyone scheduled to speak and others present in
the audience who wish to speak, have been heard.
Public Meeting
If only one person requests an opportunity to speak, we may hold a
public meeting rather than a public hearing. If you wish to meet with
us to discuss the amendment, please request a meeting by contacting the
person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. All such meetings
will be open to the public and, if possible, we will post notices of
meetings at the locations listed under ADDRESSES. We will make a
written summary of each meeting a part of the Administrative Record.
IV. Procedural Determinations
Executive Order 12630--Takings
This rule does not have takings implications. This determination is
based on the analysis performed for the counterpart Federal regulation.
Executive Order 12866--Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is exempt from review by the Office of Management and
Budget under Executive Order 12866.
Executive Order 12988--Civil Justice Reform
The Department of the Interior has conducted the reviews required
by section 3 of Executive Order 12988 and has determined that this rule
meets the applicable standards of subsections (a) and (b) of that
section. However, these standards are not applicable to the actual
language of State regulatory programs and program amendments because
each program is drafted and promulgated by a specific State, not by
OSM. Under sections 503 and 505 of SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1253 and 1255) and
the Federal regulations at 30 CFR 730.11, 732.15, and 732.17(h)(10),
decisions on proposed State regulatory programs and program amendments
submitted by the States must be based solely on a determination of
whether the submittal is consistent with SMCRA and its implementing
Federal regulations and whether the other requirements of 30 CFR Parts
730, 731, and 732 have been met.
Executive Order 13132--Federalism
This rule does not have Federalism implications. SMCRA delineates
the roles of the Federal and State governments with regard to the
regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation operations. One of
the purposes of SMCRA is to ``establish a nationwide program to protect
society and the environment from the adverse effects of surface coal
mining operations.'' Section 503(a)(1) of SMCRA requires that State
laws regulating surface coal mining and reclamation operations be ``in
accordance with'' the requirements of SMCRA, and section 503(a)(7)
requires that State programs contain rules and regulations ``consistent
with'' regulations issued by the Secretary pursuant to SMCRA.
Executive Order 13175--Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
In accordance with Executive Order 13175, we have evaluated the
potential effects of this rule on Federally recognized Indian tribes
and have determined that the rule does not have substantial direct
effects on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
The basis for this determination is our decision is on a State
regulatory program and does not involve a Federal regulation involving
Indian lands.
Executive Order 13211--Regulations That Significantly Affect the
Supply, Distribution, or Use of Energy
On May 18, 2001, the President issued Executive Order 13211 which
requires agencies to prepare a Statement of Energy Effects for a rule
that is: (1) Considered significant under Executive Order 12866, and
(2) likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy. Because this rule is exempt from review
under Executive Order 12866 and is not expected to have a significant
adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy, a
Statement of Energy Effects is not required.
National Environmental Policy Act
This rule does not require an environmental impact statement
because section 702(d) of SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1292(d)) provides that
agency decisions on proposed State regulatory program provisions do not
constitute major Federal actions within the meaning of section
102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C.
4332(2)(C)).
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not contain information collection requirements that
require approval by OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3507 et seq.).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior certifies that this rule will not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
The State submittal, which is the subject of this rule, is based upon
counterpart Federal regulations for which an economic analysis was
prepared and certification made that such regulations would not have a
significant economic effect upon a substantial number of small
entities. In making the determination as to whether this rule would
have a significant economic impact, the Department relied upon the data
and assumptions for the counterpart Federal regulations.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. This rule: (a) Does not
have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million; (b) Will not
cause a major increase in costs or prices for consumers, individual
industries, Federal, State, or local government agencies, or geographic
regions; and (c) Does not have significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the
ability of U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based
enterprises. This determination is based upon the analysis performed
under various laws and executive orders for the counterpart Federal
regulations.
Unfunded Mandates
This rule will not impose an unfunded mandate on State, local, or
[[Page 61175]]
tribal governments or the private sector of $100 million or more in any
given year. This determination is based upon the analysis performed
under various laws and executive orders for the counterpart Federal
regulations.
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 935
Intergovernmental relations, Surface mining, Underground mining.
Dated: October 2, 2003.
Brent Wahlquist,
Regional Director, Appalachian Regional Coordinating Center.
[FR Doc. 03-27044 Filed 10-24-03; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-05-P