Rising Cougar Project, Idaho Panhandle National Forests, Bonner County, ID
Note: EPA no longer updates this information, but it may be useful as a reference or resource.
[Federal Register: September 25, 2003 (Volume 68, Number 186)]
[Notices]
[Page 55368-55369]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr25se03-20]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Rising Cougar Project, Idaho Panhandle National Forests, Bonner
County, ID
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The USDA Forest Service will prepare an environmental impact
statement (EIS) to document and disclose the potential environmental
effects of proposed activities on National Forest lands near the
communities of Hope and Clark Fork, Idaho. The proposed activities for
the Rising Cougar Project are located in the Sandpoint Ranger District,
Idaho Panhandle National Forests, 25 miles east of Sandpoint, Idaho.
Goals of the proposed activities include: (1) Maintain or restore
the characteristics of ecosystem composition and structure within the
range of variability that would be expected to occur under natural
disturbance regimes. More specific objectives include: (a) Decrease
fuel loadings on National Forest lands along the wildland urban
interface to reduce the threat of uncontrollable wildfire to life and
property, (b) restore big game winter range conditions and promote the
long-term persistence and stability of wildlife habitat diversity, and
(c) re-establish structural diversity of forest stands and decrease the
proportions of Douglas-fir and grand fir, creating favorable conditions
for the growth and establishment of ponderosa pine, white pine and
larch. Another goal of the proposal is (2) manage motorized access and
road densities in the roaded portion of the project area to benefit
watersheds and grizzly bear habitat recovery goals.
Activities would include logging using a variety of yarding
systems, slashing of brush and small trees, prescribed burning, and
road management activities.
The Sandpoint Ranger District of the Idaho Panhandle National
Forests in Bonner County, Idaho will administer these activities. The
EIS will tier to the Idaho Panhandle National Forests Plan (September
1987).
DATES: Comments should be postmarked within 30 days after publication
of this notice. Please include your name and address and the name of
the project you are commenting on.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments and suggestions on the proposed
management activities or request to be placed on the project mailing
list by writing to: Rising Cougar Project, Attn: Judy York, Sandpoint
Ranger District, 1500 Hwy 2, Suite 110, Sandpoint, ID 83864.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Judy York, Project Team Leader,
Sandpoint Ranger District at 208-265-6665 or by e-mail at jyork@fs.fed.us.
Comments received in response to this solicitation, including names
and addresses of those who comment, will be considered part of the
public record on this proposed action and will be available for public
inspection. Comments submitted anonymously will be accepted and
considered; however, those who submit anonymous comments will not have
standing to appeal the subsequent decision under 36 CFR parts 215 or
217. Additionally, pursuant to 7 CFR 1.27 (d), any person may request
the agency to withhold a submission from the public record by showing
how the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) permits such confidentiality.
For persons requesting such confidentiality, it may be granted in only
very limited circumstances, such as to protect trade secrets. The
Forest Service will inform the requester of the agency's decision
regarding the request for confidentiality, and where the request is
denied, the agency will return the submission and notify the requester
that the comments may be resubmitted with or without name and address
within 10 days.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
More information about the Rising Cougar Project can be found on
the Internet at http://www.fs.fed.us/ipnf/eco/manage/nepa/index.html.
The legal description for the project area includes all or portions
of sections 30-32 in T57N, R2E; sections 1, 3-5, 9-14, 16, 17 and 24 in
T56N; R2E; sections 6, 7, 19, and 30-33 in T56N, R3E; section 1 in
T55N, R2E; and sections 3-7 and 10 in T44N, R3E.
The Forest Service will be preparing an environmental impact
statement for the following proposed activities and alternative courses
of action based on public comments.
Treatment in Inventoried Roadless Areas (IRAs): Portions of the
project lie within the Beetop and Scotchman IRAs. To achieve our
ecosystem objectives in the inventoried roadless areas, helicopter
logging and prescribed burning activities would be used on about 4,080
acres.
Treatment Outside Inventoried Roadless Areas: To achieve our
ecosystem objectives in the south portion of the project area,
helicopter and road-based logging systems, and prescribed burning would
be used on about 1,965 acres. In areas where we need to promote the
regeneration of white pine, ponderosa pine, and larch, openings would
be planted with these species. In addition, about 0.5 mile of temporary
road would be constructed on Sugarloaf Mountain to access stands for
treatment using road-based logging systems.
To achieve our watershed and grizzly bear habitat recovery goals,
road management activities would include putting 5.7 miles of gated
road into storage, decommissioning 3.4 miles of road, and transferring
the motorized access point of an unclassified road to a classified road
with 0.2 miles of new road construction.
Preliminary issues identified relate to effects of the proposed
activities on: roadless area characteristics, public road access, water
quality, fish habitat, risk of fire, air quality, noxious weed spread,
visual quality, noise, soils, heritage resources, old growth, finances,
and threatened, endangered and sensitive fish, wildlife and plants.
Current alternatives consist of the proposed action and no action.
Two periods are specifically designated for comments on this
analysis: (1) During the scoping period which is 30 days from the date
of this notice in the Federal Register and (2) during the draft EIS
comment period. In accordance with 36 CFR 215.5, as published in the
Federal Register, Volume 68 no. 107, June 4, 2003, the draft EIS
comment period will be the designated time in which ``substantive''
comments will be considered. The mailing list for this project will
include those individuals who have expressed interest in this project
as well as adjacent landowners and those responding to this NOI or to
the Idaho Panhandle National Forests Quarterly Schedule of Proposed
Action. In addition, the public is encouraged to contact or visit with
Forest Service officials during the analysis and prior to the decision.
The Forest Service will continue to seek information, comments, and
assistance for Federal, Tribal, State, and local agencies and other
individuals or organizations that may be interested in or affected by
the proposed actions. The United States Fish and Wildlife Service will
be consulted concerning any effects to threatened and endangered
species. The agency invites written comments and suggestions on this
action, particularly in terms of identification of issues and
alternative development.
Comments from the public and other agencies will be used in
preparation of the Draft EIS to identify potential issues and concerns,
potential alternatives to
[[Page 55369]]
the proposed action and to promote communications with members of the
public or other agencies. The draft environmental impact statement
(DEIS) will be filed with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and
made available for public review in spring of 2004. The final
environmental impact statement is expected to be completed in fall of
2004. The comment period on the draft environmental impact statement
will be 45 days from the date the Environmental Protection Agency
publishes the notice of availability in the Federal Register.
The Forest Service believes, at this early stage, it is important
to give reviewers notice of several court rulings related to public
participation in the environmental review process. First, reviewers of
draft environmental impact statements must structure their
participation in the environmental review of the proposal so that it is
meaningful and alerts and agency to the reviewer's position and
contentions. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519,
553 (1978). Also, environmental objections that could be raised at the
draft environmental statement stage but that are not raised until after
completion of the final environmental statement may be waived or
dismissed by the courts. City of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F. 2d 1016, 1022
(9th Cir. 1986) and Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490 F. Supp.
1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980). Because of these court rulings, it is very
important that those interested in this proposed action participate by
the close of the 45-day comment period so that substantive comments and
objections are made available to the Forest Service at a time when it
can meaningfully consider them and respond to them in the final
environmental impact statement.
To assist the Forest Service in identifying and considering issues
related to the proposed action, comments on the draft environmental
impact statement should be as specific as possible. It is also helpful
if comments refer to specific pages or chapters of the draft statement.
Comments may also address the adequacy of the draft environmental
impact statement or the merits of the alternatives formulated and
discussed in the statement. Reviewers may wish to refer to the Council
on Environmental Quality Regulations for implementing the procedural
provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act at 40 CFR 1503.3 in
addressing these points.
The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits
discrimination in its programs on the basis of race, color, national
origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, and marital
or familial status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.)
Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of
communication of program information (braille, large print, audiotape,
etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and
TDD). To file a complaint, write the Secretary of Agriculture, U.S.
Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC 20250, or call 1-800-245-6340
(voice) or 202-720-1127 (TDD), USDA is an equal employment opportunity
employer.
The Idaho Panhandle National Forests Supervisor will make a
decision on this project after considering comments and responses,
environmental consequences discussed in the Final EIS, and applicable
laws, regulations and policies. The decision and supporting reasons
will then be documented in a Record of Decision.
Dated: September 17, 2003.
Ranotta K. McNair,
Forest Supervisor, Idaho Panhandle National Forests.
[FR Doc. 03-24269 Filed 9-24-03; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
![[logo] US EPA](http://www.epa.gov/epafiles/images/logo_epaseal.gif)