Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Fire Management Plan, Santa Monica Mountains National Recreation Area, Los Angeles and Ventura Counties, CA; Notice of Availability
Note: EPA no longer updates this information, but it may be useful as a reference or resource.
[Federal Register: June 16, 2004 (Volume 69, Number 115)]
[Notices]
[Page 33655-33657]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr16jn04-71]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Fire Management Plan, Santa
Monica Mountains National Recreation Area, Los Angeles and Ventura
Counties, CA; Notice of Availability
Summary: Pursuant to Sec. 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (Pub. L. 91-190, as amended), and the Council on
Environmental Quality Regulations (40 CFR Part 1500-1508), the National
Park Service, Department of the Interior, has prepared a Draft
Environmental Impact Statement identifying and evaluating four
alternatives for a proposed update to the Fire Management Plan at Santa
Monica Mountains National Recreation Area (SMMNRA), California.
Potential impacts and appropriate mitigations are assessed for each
alternative. When approved, the plan will guide all future fire
management actions in the SMMNRA for five to ten years.
The Draft Santa Monica Mountains Environmental Impact Statement
(DSMMEIS) documents the
[[Page 33656]]
environmental impact analysis of three action alternatives, and a no
action alternative. These fire management alternatives are needed to
meet public safety, natural and cultural resource management, and
wildland urban interface protection objectives on National Park Service
(NPS) managed lands within the SMMNRA. They are also designed to
protect ecological and cultural resource values based on a current
understanding of the dynamic relationship between the native chaparral/
coastal sage scrub vegetation and the fire climate of the Santa Monica
Mountains. Related activities such as coordination with local fire
agencies, assessment of fire hazards, and public education apply to all
private and public lands within the SMMNRA boundary. In varying degrees
each action alternative identifies measures to address resource
condition and education goals as called for in the SMMNRA General
Management Plan, which was approved in 2003.
Alternatives Analyzed: Elements common to all alternatives include
the goal of complete suppression of wildland fires. Under the
management preferred alternative, which is also the ``environmentally
preferred'' alternative (Alternative 2, Mechanical Fuel Reduction/
Ecological Prescribed Fire/Strategic Fuels Treatment) prescribed
burning is used to provide resource enhancement. In addition, hazard
fuel reduction projects using prescribed fire or mechanical fuel
reduction are considered in strategic locations to reduce the chance of
wildfires which may damage life and property or impact natural and
cultural resources. Short-term and site-specific resource impacts of
strategic prescribed fires are weighed against long-term and regional
hazard fuel reduction benefits. Strategic zones are identified using
up-to-date analysis of vegetation types, fuel characteristics, fire
spread models, and potential hazards to life, property and natural and
cultural resources. Mechanical fuel reduction is concentrated at the
wildland urban interface to protect homes. This alternative provides
maximum potential environmental benefit and minimizes the adverse
impacts of fire management actions. It is also the most flexible
alternative, utilizing all available fire management strategies
identified to be appropriate in the Santa Monica Mountains.
Under the No-Action Alternative (Alternative 1) the current SMMNRA
fire and vegetation management program, approved in 1986 and revised in
1994, would be retained. It is intended to create a landscape mosaic of
varying aged chaparral stands through the application of prescribed
fire in separate watersheds. Brush clearance is limited to the wildland
urban interface (those areas directly adjacent to homes and roads that
abut parkland or open space). In recent years the desired execution of
this program has been difficult because of increasingly complex
regulatory constraints on prescribed fire, especially those relating to
air quality standards. Maintaining the current program has the
potential in the long term to be ecologically damaging to native plant
communities. It may not provide direct protection for residential areas
by reducing fuel loads at the wildland urban interface. A growing body
of research indicates that the program does not provide effective
control of wildfire spread under severe weather conditions.
Under Alternative 3 (Mechanical Fuel Reduction/Ecological
Prescribed Fire) prescribed burning is used exclusively to provide
resource enhancement including control of exotic species and
restoration of natural communities. Mosaic burning is eliminated. Fuel
hazard reduction is concentrated at the wildland urban interface to
protect homes and development and emphasizes brush clearance by
mechanical means. This alternative lacks the potential risk reduction
benefits from strategic fuel modification.
Under Alternative 4 (Mechanical Fuel Reduction only) vegetation
management is limited to expanded brush clearance at the wildland urban
interface. Prescribed fire is eliminated. This alternative provides
effective protection of homes by focusing mechanical fuel reduction at
the interface between homes and wildland vegetation, but lacks the
ecological benefits of resource prescribed burning, and the potential
risk reduction benefits from strategic fuel modification.
Planning Background: The DSMMEIS was prepared pursuant to the
National Environmental Policy Act in compliance with NPS environmental
requirements. Public outreach was initiated in June 2001 with a
planning workshop for agencies, cooperators and other partners attended
by approximately 30 people. A Scoping Notice published in the Federal
Register in March 2002 encouraged comments during a six month period.
Four public meetings were also held in April 2002, in Beverly Hills,
Calabasas, Malibu and Thousand Oaks, California. Two additional
meetings were held in June 2002 to gain additional input on the
alternatives from fire agencies, cooperators and other partners.
Approximately 35 citizens attended these six sessions. Letters were
also sent to Native American representatives, requesting their comments
and concerns related to cultural activities, practices or resources. In
addition to the oral comments, the park received nine letters, faxes
and emails; a majority of respondents supported a strategy that
provided the most flexibility. One letter encouraged planners to
minimize prescribed burning as a management tool. These responses,
along with information from the 2001 preliminary workshop involving
numerous fire management and land management agencies, have been taken
into account in the development of alternatives.
Public Meetings: In order to facilitate public review and comment
on the DSMMEIS, several public meetings are planned for August 2004
(with at least two to be held in the evening and one in the afternoon;
possible locations include Beverly Hills, Malibu, Calabasas/Agoura
Hills, and Thousand Oaks, California). Detailed information on location
and times for all public meetings will be published in local and
regional newspapers several weeks in advance and announced on the
park's webpage. SMMNRA management and fire planning officials will
attend all sessions to present the DSMMEIS and receive comments and
answer questions.
Comments: The complete DSMMEIS will be posted on the SMMNRA webpage
at http://www.nps.gov/samo/pphtml/documents.html.
Copies in
printed or CD form will be available at park headquarters in Thousand Oaks
and at local and regional libraries in the greater Los Angeles area; these
locations will also be posted on the Web site. Copies will also be sent
directly to those who request it (specify desired format and inquire at
(805) 370-2331 or via eMail per address below). All written comments
must be postmarked, or transmitted electronically, not later than
September 15, 2004. All comments should be addressed to the
Superintendent and mailed to Santa Monica Mountains NRA, 401 W.
Hillcrest Drive, Thousand Oaks, CA 91360 Attn: Fire Management Plan; or
eMailed to: samo_fire@nps.gov (in the subject line, type:
Fire Mgmt Plan EIS). All comments received will be maintained in the
administrative record and the information provided may be made
available for public review. If individuals submitting comments request
that their name and/or address be withheld from public disclosure, it
will be honored to the extent allowable by law. Such requests must be
stated prominently in the beginning of the comments. There also may be
circumstances wherein the NPS will
[[Page 33657]]
withhold a respondent's identity as allowable by law. As always, NPS
will make available to public inspection all submissions from
organizations or businesses and from persons identifying themselves as
representatives or officials of organizations and businesses, and,
anonymous comments may not be considered.
Decision Process: Depending upon the degree of public interest and
response from other agencies and organizations, at this time it is
anticipated that the Final Fire Management Plan and Environmental
Impact Statement will be completed during 2005; availability of the
document will be duly noticed in the Federal Register and announced in
local and regional press. Subsequently, a Record of Decision may be
approved not sooner than thirty days after the final document is
distributed. As a delegated EIS, the official responsible for the
decision is the Regional Director, Pacific West Region, National Park
Service; subsequently the official responsible for implementation is
the Superintendent, Santa Monica Mountains NRA.
Dated: May 11, 2004.
Jonathan B. Jarvis,
Regional Director, Pacific West Region.
[FR Doc. 04-13520 Filed 6-15-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312-52-P
![[logo] US EPA](http://www.epa.gov/epafiles/images/logo_epaseal.gif)