Supplemental Watershed Plan No. 1 East Fork of the Grand River Watershed and Environmental Assessment for East Fork of the Grand River Watershed Plan and Environmental Impact Statement (Approved 1996), Ringgold and Union Counties, IA, and Harrison and Worth Counties, MO
Note: EPA no longer updates this information, but it may be useful as a reference or resource.
[Federal Register: October 5, 2004 (Volume 69, Number 192)]
[Notices]
[Page 59578-59579]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr05oc04-29]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Supplemental Watershed Plan No. 1 East Fork of the Grand River
Watershed and Environmental Assessment for East Fork of the Grand River
Watershed Plan and Environmental Impact Statement (Approved 1996),
Ringgold and Union Counties, IA, and Harrison and Worth Counties, MO
AGENCY: Natural Resources Conservation Service.
ACTION: Notice of finding of no significant impact.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 102(2)(c)of the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969; the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations
(40 CFR part 1500); and the Natural Resources Conservation Service
Regulations (7 CFR part 650); the Natural Resources Conservation
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, gives notice than an
environmental impact statement is not being prepared for the
Supplemental Watershed Plan No. 1 for East Fork of the Grand River
Watershed Plan and Environmental Impact Statement (Approved 1996),
Ringgold and Union Counties, Iowa, and Harrison and Worth Counties,
Missouri.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard Van Klaveren, State
Conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 210 Walnut
Street, 693 Federal Building, Des Moines, IA 50309-2180.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The environmental assessment of this
federally assisted action indicates that the project will not cause
significant impacts on the environment. As a result of these findings,
Richard Van Klaveren, State Conservationist, has determined that the
preparation and review of an environmental impact statement are not
needed for this project.
This document sets forth a supplement to the East Fork of the Grand
Watershed Plan-EIS that slightly relocates and enlarges multipurpose
structure GB-3 from a permanent pool of 350 acres to 565 acres. The 565
acre site will be renamed Gooseberry Lake. The increase in size is to
meet additional other agricultural water management and recreation
needs.
Gooseberry Lake and its 6210 acre watershed are northeast of Mount
Ayr and are located entirely in Ringgold County, Iowa.
The Notice of a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) has been
forwarded to the Environmental Protection Agency and to various
Federal, State, and local agencies. A limited number of copies of
the FONSI are available to fill single copy requests at the above
address. The FONSI is also available at the Iowa NRCS Web site at
http://www.ia.nrcs.usda.gov.
A copy of the Supplemental
Watershed Plan-Environmental Assessment may be obtained by contacting
Richard Van Klaveren.
No administrative action will be taken until 30 days after the date
of this publication in the Federal Register.
Dated: September 28, 2004.
Richard Van Klaveren,
State Conservationist.
Finding of No Significant Impact for the Supplemental Watershed Plan
No. 1 East Fork of the Grand River Watershed and Environmental
Assessment Ringgold County, Iowa
Introduction
The Supplemental Watershed Plan No. 1 East Fork of the Grand
River Watershed and Environmental Assessment (EA) describes the
recommended alternative which is a modification of the GB-3
multipurpose site that was part of the East Fork of the Grand River
Watershed Plan and Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). The
Supplemental Watershed Plan No. 1-EA compares the effects that will
arise from the installation of Gooseberry Lake to those that would
have occurred from the installation of the original GB-3 structure.
This modification of the GB-3 site is necessary to meet the
Sponsors' request to increase the water supply and recreation
resources from those originally planned for GB-3 lake site in order
to satisfy increased demands for these resources from the public.
The East Fork of the Grand River Watershed Plan and EIS was
approved in 1996 under the authority of the Watershed Protection and
Flood Prevention Act of 1954 (Public Law No. 566, 83rd Congress).
This supplemental plan-EA is being planned and will be
implemented under the same authority. It is being planned and is in
compliance with all National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the
National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 as amended (NHPA)
provisions. The policies and procedures of the Watershed Protection
and Flood Prevention Act, Public Law 83-566 as amended (16 U.S.C.
1001 et seq.) are being utilized for the planning and implementation
of this project.
An environmental evaluation was undertaken by the Natural
Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) in conjunction with the
development of this supplemental plan-EA. This evaluation was
undertaken in consultation with local, State and Federal agencies as
well as interested organizations and individuals. Copies of the
supplemental plan-EA are available for public review from the
following location: Natural Resources Conservation Service, 210
Walnut Street, 693 Federal Building, Des Moines, IA 50309-2180.
Recommended Action
Site GB-3 will be moved downstream and increased in size. This
relocated structure site is renamed Gooseberry Lake. The Gooseberry
Lake Association will acquire the 2,365 acres needed for Gooseberry
Lake and surrounding area for public use as a fish and wildlife area.
The Gooseberry Lake will have a permanent pool of 565 acres, 1,393
acres managed as wildlife habitat, and 182 acre county park. The dam
and floodwater storage pool comprise the balance of the 2,365 project
acres.
[[Page 59579]]
Access roads, parking areas, boat ramps, wildlife plantings in the
adjacent lands, fishing jetties, in-lake facilities, underwater fish
structures, etc., will be installed by the Iowa Department of Natural
Resources (IDNR) with their own funds. The Ringgold County Conservation
Board (RCCB) will install the recreation facilities such as roads,
campgrounds, cabins, restrooms, picnic areas, beach, parking lots, etc.
Effects of the Recommended Actions
There are no cultural resources in the area of potential effect.
Construction of recreation facilities (i.e. access roads, cabins, boat
ramps, etc.) will need further cultural resources survey. Construction
discoveries will be handled in accordance with NRCS General Manual,
Section 420, Part 401.
Construction of the dam and multipurpose pool inundates 24,000 feet
(8 acres) of low quality ephemeral and intermittent warm water stream
channel habitat. This conversion creates 565 acres of high quality warm
water lacustrine habitat.
No jurisdictional wetlands were identified in either the planned
multipurpose pool, flood pool, or at the structure site.
Ringgold County is within the summer range of the Indiana Bat
(myotis sodalis). However, since less than five percent of the project
area is in woodland, suitable habitat for this species does not occur
at the project site. No other Federal or state listed T&E species are
known to occur in the Gooseberry Lake project area, nor are there any
areas of suitable habitat for those species listed for Ringgold County
in this project area.
While 110.1 acres woody wildlife habitat with a value of 73.6
Habitat Units will be lost to the structure and pool, the installation
of planned measures will produce 248 additional acres of woody wildlife
habitat worth 110.8 Habitat Units. This will produce a net project gain
of 147.9 acres and 37.8 habitat units.
Grassland wildlife habitat on 425 acres with a value of 117.7
Habitat Units will be lost due to the project. The installation of
planned measures will produce 650 acres additional acres of grassland
wildlife habitat worth 299 Habitat Units. This will produce a net
project gain of 225 acres and 181.3 habitat units.
Installation of the project will convert 2,365 acres of cropland,
hayland, and pasture to non-agricultural land uses. This includes 725
acres of prime farmland.
Alternative Actions
The only alternative action to the proposed action considered in
the supplemental plan-EA would be to construct Site GB-3 approved in
the original watershed plan-EIS. That alternative action was rejected
by the Sponsors. The supplemental plan is the only alternative that
meets the local Sponsors objectives and is acceptable to local
residents. The plan is the National Economic Development (NED) plan.
Consultation and Public Participation
The Gooseberry Lake Agency has held more than 40 meetings beginning
in 2000. All have been conducted in accordance with the Iowa Open
Meetings Law. This means that the public has been notified of each
meeting and allowed to attend and participate in each meeting.
Typically, 10-25 members of the public attend these regular meetings;
two to five request time on the agenda to speak. One or more members of
the NRCS staff were at each of those meetings in order to answer
questions and receive comments.
Ongoing public participation identified the need to include
detailed information on recreation benefits and other direct costs
related to lost farm income. This was done and was discussed in the
supplemental plan-EA.
NRCS hosted a week long open house at Mount Ayr, Iowa in February
2004. Numerous displays and information related to the East Fork of the
Grand Watershed and the proposed 565 acre Gooseberry Lake were
available during the open house. NRCS staff answered questions from the
over 80 public participants.
Seven Indian tribal contacts and one local historical society were
notified of this intended action in accordance with 36CFR800. They were
consulted about their knowledge of historical properties in the project
area. No response was received from the tribes or the local historical
society.
The draft supplemental plan was provided to local, state, and
federal agencies and non-governmental organizations for a 45 day long
interagency review beginning in March, 2004. Any private citizens who
requested the document were also mailed copies and requested to comment
during the interagency review comment period. Seventy-eight copies of
the supplemental plan-EA were distributed to the above agencies and
private citizens during the interagency comment period. The NRCS
also posted the draft supplemental plan on its Iowa Web site, at
http://www.ia.nrcs.usda.gov.
News releases were issued to
state and local media announcing its availability on the Web site and
that hard copies could be obtained by contacting the NRCS-Iowa state
office. Requests for review and input into the document were part of the
news releases. Significant comments were received from five private
citizens, four government agencies, and one non-governmental
organization. These comments were addressed in the final supplemental
plan-EA.
Conclusion
The Environmental Assessment summarized above indicates that this
Federal action will not cause significant impacts on the environment.
Therefore, based on the above findings, I have determined that an
environmental impact statement for the Supplemental Watershed Plan No.
1 East Fork of the Grand River Watershed is not required.
Dated: September 28, 2004.
Richard Van Klaveren,
State Conservationist.
[FR Doc. 04-22300 Filed 10-4-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-16-P
![[logo] US EPA](http://www.epa.gov/epafiles/images/logo_epaseal.gif)