Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of EPA Comments
Note: EPA no longer updates this information, but it may be useful as a reference or resource.
[Federal Register: October 29, 2004 (Volume 69, Number 209)]
[Notices]
[Page 63146-63147]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr29oc04-59]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[ER-FRL-6657-2]
Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of
EPA Comments
Availability of EPA comments prepared pursuant to the Environmental
Review Process (ERP), under Section 309 of the Clean Air Act and
Section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental Policy Act, as amended.
Requests for copies of EPA comments can be directed to the Office of
Federal Activities at (202) 564-7167.
An explanation of the ratings assigned to draft environmental
impact statements (EISs) was published in FR dated April 2, 2004 (69 FR
17403).
Draft EISs
ERP No. D-NAS-K11114-HI Rating EC2, Outrigger Telescopes Project,
Proposed for the W.M. Keck Observatory Site within the Mauna Kea
Science Reserve, Funding, Construction, Installation and Operation,
Island of Hawaii.
Summary: EPA expressed concerns about the cumulative impacts to
native Hawaiian cultural resources, visual resources, and species
impacts, and asked for more information supporting the selection of the
proposed alternative.
ERP No. D-NOA-K91013-HI Rating EC2, Seabird Interaction Mitigation
Methods, To Reduce Interaction with Seabird in Hawaii-Based Longline
Fishery and Pelagic Squid Fishery Management, To Establish an Effective
Management Framework for Pelagic Squid Fisheries, Fishery Management
Plan, Pelagic Fisheries of the Western Pacific Region, Exclusive
Economic Zone of the U.S. and High Sea.
Summary: EPA expressed concerns over the impacts to seabirds
associated with the preferred alternative, and requested more
information on the effects of the newly-established U.S. squid fishery
of protected species.
ERP No. D-NOA-L91025-00 Rating EC2, 2005-2006 Pacific Coast
Groundfish Fishery, Proposed Acceptable Biological Catch and Optimum
Yield Specifications and Management Measures, WA, OR and CA.
Summary: EPA expressed concerns about projected exceedences for
optimum yields for canary and widow rockfish, impacts on essential fish
habitat, and the need to increase observer coverage for better
accounting of bycatch.
ERP No. D-NOA-L99010-AK Rating LO, Pribilof Islands Setting for the
Annual Subsistence Harvest of Northern Fur Seals, To Determine and
Publish the Take Ranges, Pribilof Islands, AK.
Summary: EPA does not object to the proposed harvest levels or
their associated impacts.
ERP No. DS-TPT-K61154-CA Rating LO, Presidio Trust Public Health
Service Hospital (PUSH or Building 1801) at the Presidio of San
Francisco (Area B) of Presidio Trust Management Plan, To Rehabilitate
and Reuse Buildings, Gold Gate National Recreation Area, San Francisco
Bay, Marin County, CA.
Summary: EPA had a lack of objections to the project as proposed.
Final EISs
ERP No. F-AFS-J65375-MT Sheep Creek Range Analysis, Grazing and
Special Use Allotments Reorganization, Grazing and Special Use Permits
Issuance, Lewis and Clark National Forest, White Sulphur Springs Ranger
District, Meagher and Cascade Counties, MT.
Summary: EPA supports improved grazing management, but expressed
environmental concerns about continued impacts to water quality from
delays in reducing grazing pressure (AUMs) on allotments with less than
properly functioning streams for 3-5 years or longer. EPA recommends
more timely implementation of grazing improvements, including AUM
reductions, on allotments with non-functioning and functioning-at-risk
streams.
ERP No. F-AFS-L65372-AK Threemile Timber Sale, Implementation,
Petersburg Ranger District, Tongass National Forest, AK.
Summary: No comment letter was sent to the preparing agency.
ERP No. F-AFS-L65373-AK Gravina Island Timber Sale, Implementation,
Timber Harvest and Related Activities, Ketchikan-Misty Fiords Ranger
District, Tongass National Forest, AK.
Summary: The Final EIS responded to EPA's concerns by developing a
new alternative that combined helicopter and land-based timber
extraction and selecting an alternative that is less damaging to
riparian areas and greatly limited road access, protecting deer habitat
and intertidal areas which are
[[Page 63147]]
subsistence resources for native Alaskans. EPA continues to have
concerns about the adverse impacts to streams and wetlands, as well as
cumulative impacts from roads and access to the roadless area.
ERP No. F-AFS-L65452-ID South Fork Wildfire Salvage Project,
Harvesting Fire-Killed and Imminently Dead Trees, Cascade Ranger
District, Boise National Forest, Valley County, ID.
Summary: No comment letter was sent to the preparing agency.
ERP No. F-BLM-L65446-AK Alpine Satellite Development Plan,
Construction and Operation of Five Oil Production Pads, Associated
Well, Roads, Airstrips, Pipelines and Powerlines, Authorization and
Permits Issuance, Northeast corner of the National Petroleum Reserve-
Alaska, Colville River Delta, North Slope Borough, AK.
Summary: EPA has environmental concerns about the Preferred
Alternative (Alternative F). The Final EIS does not provide sufficient
information, data, analyses, or discussion to ensure that all
developmental components of the Preferred Alternative will meet the
substantive environmental requirements of Clean Water Act Section 404.
In addition, EPA has concerns about impacts from current road alignment
design, disturbance from access to production pads, the potential for
violation of Special Condition 10 of the Corps Permit, erosion from pad
sidesloped, lack of specific mitigation measures, and insufficient 9
information regarding air quality impacts.
ERP No. F-COE-L32011-AK Akutan Harbor Navigation Improvements
Project, Construction and Implementation, Bering Sea, City of Akutan,
AK.
Summary: EPA agreed with U.S. Army Corps' conclusion that the
project would not violate Alaska's water quality standards or exceed
the Akutan Harbor TMDL load allocations. However, EPA reiterated
objections to the direct and indirect effects on wetlands, and
requested that the Corps explore offsite beneficial use options to the
stockpiling of dredged material in wetlands. EPA also recommended that
the Corps explore compensatory mitigation through wetland enhancements
during detailed project design.
ERP No. F-NOA-E39066-FL Programmatic EIS--Seagrass Restoration in
the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary, Implementation, U.S. Army
COE Section 404 and CZMA Permits, Monroe County, FL.
Summary: EPA continues to fully support the proposed restoration
goals for Seagrass damaged in FKNMS waters, but requests that some
issues be clarified in the NOAA ROD.
Dated: October 26, 2004.
Robert W. Hargrove,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 04-24251 Filed 10-28-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![[logo] US EPA](http://www.epa.gov/epafiles/images/logo_epaseal.gif)