![[logo] US EPA](http://www.epa.gov/epafiles/images/logo_epaseal.gif){kind=logo}
Sugar Program Definitions
Note: EPA no longer updates this information, but it may be useful as a reference or resource.
[Federal Register: September 13, 2004 (Volume 69, Number 176)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 55061-55063]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr13se04-1]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of
Documents. Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER
issue of each week.
========================================================================
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Commodity Credit Corporation
7 CFR Part 1435
RIN 0560-AH21
Sugar Program Definitions
AGENCY: Commodity Credit Corporation, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule amends the Sugar Program regulations of the
Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC). Specifically, the definitions of
``ability to market'', ``market'' and ``sugar'' are revised. Also, the
regulation is modified to describe the procedure used to reassign
allocation deficits. These changes are intended to reduce the
uncertainty and burden of sugar production forecasting.
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is effective September 13, 2004.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barbara Fecso, Sugar Analyst, Dairy
and Sweeteners Analysis Group, USDA, Farm Service Agency, 1400
Independence Ave SW., Washington DC 20250-0516. 202-720-6733. E-mail:
barbara.fecso@usda.gov. Persons with disabilities who require
alternative means for communication (Braille, large print, audiotape,
etc.) should contact the USDA Target Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice
and TDD).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion of Changes
CCC published regulations on August 26, 2002 (67 FR 54928), to
implement the Sugar Program provisions of Title I of the Farm Security
and Rural Investment Act of 2002 (the 2002 Act). That rule governed
various activities affecting sugar beet and sugar cane producers and
processors and the domestic market for sugar. In this rule, CCC is
making two changes to Sugar Program regulations as a result of
definitions that have had an unintended affect on program
administration. The changes are as follows:
The definition of ``ability to market'' is being changed to
discourage excess sugarcane acreage and reduce the uncertainty and
burden of sugar production forecasting. ``Ability to market'' is used
in conjunction with two other factors to determine each cane sugar
state's marketing allotment and each sugarcane processor's allocation
within a state. ``Ability to market'' was measured as the quantity of
raw sugar produced during the applicable crop year. This definition
disregards beginning stocks, which is part of a processor's ability to
fulfill its allocation. This exclusion discourages cane processors from
filling their allocation from stocks and encourages continued planting
to maintain their allocation.
The accrual of large stocks that must be carried over into the next
year due to the imposition of marketing allotments is increasing the
likelihood of problems with the current definition of ``ability to
market''. The problem created by excluding beginning stocks would be
aggravated in cane disasters. A substantial loss in forecast cane sugar
production would result in a considerable reduction in a processor's
sugar marketing allocation, regardless of the processor's stock level.
The current definition of ``ability to market'' requires CCC to
estimate crop year production for each state and processor using
periodic processor surveys. State allotments and processor allocations
are adjusted as these estimates change throughout the year. This
process creates uncertainty for the sugarcane processors and a
significant administrative burden for CCC and processors.
Hawaii and Puerto Rico already have a fixed allotment and their
state allotment and processor definition of ``ability to market'' will
not be changed. For the mainland states, the new definition for
``ability to market'' will be based on the states' and processors' 1999
through 2003 crop year production history. The mainland states'
``ability to market'' will be measured as the production from the
highest production year for each state in the base period. This same
measure of ``ability to market'' will be used to divide the Florida
cane sugar marketing allotment among the state's processors. CCC will
divide the Louisiana cane sugar marketing allotment among the state's
processors using an average of (1) an Olympic average over the base
period and (2) the 2003 crop. CCC will use the 2003-crop estimate of
production that it used to develop the July World Agricultural Supply
and Demand Estimates.
Since the other two factors are based on historical production, the
cane states' allotments and processor allocations will now be based
completely on historical data. Since allotments and allocations are not
dependent on current production, the data collection burden on CCC and
the processors, and the incentive to maintain sugarcane acreage is
reduced. Allocations will balance with available sugar as processors
sell over-allocation sugar to processors that need it, in accordance
with the regulations, and as CCC reassigns unused allocation between
processors and unused allotment between states.
The ``ability to market'' definition does not affect the
reassignment process. The 2002 Act requires CCC to determine, from time
to time, if a processor is unable (and conversely, able) to market its
allocation. Consistent with the 2002 Act, CCC uses the best available
data to make its determination and specifically lists then-current
inventories of sugar, the estimated production of sugar and expected
marketings, and other pertinent factors. CCC determines if a processor
is unable to market its allocation by comparing a processor's sugar
supply (with some exceptions) with its allocation. Specifically, CCC
calculates a processor's available crop-year supply as its beginning
stocks, plus production and purchased over-allocation sugar, less sales
of over-allocation sugar, and desired ending stocks (generally zero).
CCC recognizes that it should reduce supply by nonhuman use sales and
exports but has not done so to date. Early reassignments require CCC to
use estimates subject to error and allocation cannot be returned to a
processor because too much was taken away. Thus, CCC will be more
conservative in reducing a processor's allocation earlier in the year
than later. At this time, CCC has no measure of its early conservatism
but will work with the processors losing allocation to permit them a
margin of
[[Page 55062]]
error beyond the formula results. This process worked satisfactorily in
FY 2003.
The second change CCC is making is to clarify the definitions of
market and marketing to include sales for non-domestic consumption,
nonhuman consumption, and sales to another processor to enable that
processor to fulfill its marketing allocation. The current definition
for market and marketing excludes these sales. However, 7 CFR 1435.307
describes these types of sales as ``marketings,'' but exempts them from
being subject to the restriction of a processor's marketing
allocations. CCC is developing procedures to ensure that sales for non-
domestic consumption and nonhuman consumption, which also are not
counted against a processor's sugar marketing allocation, are bona fide
sales that do not affect the domestic food use market.
The new definition provides that the sale of sugar for non-domestic
consumption, nonhuman consumption, or to another processor will be a
sugar ``marketing'' regulated by 7 CFR 1435. This result is
accomplished by deleting the sentence that excludes these sales from
the ``marketing'' definition. The regulation retains the exemption for
sales made before May 1, reported to CCC within 51 days.
The third change CCC is making is to clarify the definition of
sugar to include in-process sugar, such as thick juice, in the current
7 CFR part 1435 definition, but implied elsewhere in the regulation
language.
CCC modifies the reassignment provisions in Sec. 1435.309 to
explain more fully CCC's reassignment procedures. This rule also
replaces the ``by May 1'' in section 1435.309(a) with language of the
2002 Act, ``from time to time''. May 1 is not an appropriate time to
make reassignment determinations for all processors because CCC permits
processors to buy or sell over-allocation sugar until May 1. The
deadline ``by April 15'' is eliminated in section 1435.309(b) for the
same reason.
Notice and Comment
These changes will not be published with a request for public
comment, and will be implemented with a final rule. Section 1601(c) of
the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 (2002 Act) provides
that the regulations needed to administer Title I of the 2002 Act,
including those involved here, may be promulgated without regard to the
notice and comment provisions of 5 U.S.C. 553 or the Statement of
Policy of the Secretary of Agriculture effective July 24, 1971, (36 FR
13804) relating to notices of proposed rulemaking and public
participation in rulemaking. The rule will be effective upon
publication in order to provide its benefit to producers as soon as
possible.
Executive Order 12866
This interim rule has been designated as ``Not significant'' under
Executive Order 12866 and has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget.
Federal Assistance Programs
This final rule applies to the following Federal assistance
programs, as found in the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance:
10.051--Commodity Loans and Loan Deficiency Payments.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act does not apply to this rule because
CCC is not required by 5 U.S.C. 553 or other law to publish a notice of
proposed rulemaking for the subject of this rule.
Environmental Assessment
The environmental impacts of this rule have been considered under
the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), 42 U.S.C. 4321 et
seq., the regulations of the Council on Environmental Quality (40 CFR
parts 1500-1508), and regulations of the Farm Service Agency (FSA) of
the Department of Agriculture (USDA) for compliance with NEPA, 7 CFR
part 799. An environmental evaluation was completed and the proposed
action has been determined not to have the potential to significantly
impact the quality of the human environment and no environmental
assessment or environmental impact statement is necessary. A copy of
the environmental evaluation is available for inspection and review
upon request.
Executive Order 12778
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12778. This rule
preempts State laws that are inconsistent with it and is not
retroactive. Before judicial action may be brought concerning this
rule, all administrative remedies must be exhausted.
Executive Order 12372
This program is not subject to Executive Order 12372, which
requires intergovernmental consultation with State and local officials.
See the notice related to 7 CFR part 3015, subpart V, published at 48
FR 29115 (June 24, 1983).
Unfunded Mandates
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) does
not apply to this rule because CCC is not required by 5 U.S.C. 553 or
any other law to publish a notice of proposed rulemaking for the
subject of this rule. Further, this rule contains no unfunded mandates
as defined in sections 202 and 205 of UMRA.
Paperwork Reduction Act
Section 1601(c) of the 2002 Act provides that these regulations may
be promulgated and the programs administered without regard to chapter
5 of title 44 of the United States Code (the Paperwork Reduction Act).
Accordingly, these regulations and the forms and other information
collection activities needed to administer the provisions authorized by
these regulations are not subject to review by the Office of Management
and Budget under the Paperwork Reduction Act.
Government Paperwork Elimination Act
CCC is committed to compliance with the Government Paperwork
Elimination Act, which requires Federal Government agencies to provide
the public the option of submitting information or transacting business
electronically to the maximum extent possible. However, the information
collections required by 7 CFR part 1435 rule are not yet fully
implemented for the public to conduct business with FSA electronically.
CCC Sugar Program forms are available on the agency's Internet web
site. Forms may be completed and saved on a computer, but must be
printed, signed and submitted to FSA in paper form.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1435
Loan programs--agriculture, Price support programs, Reporting and
record keeping requirements, and Sugar.
? For the reasons set out in the preamble, 7 CFR part 1435 is amended as
set forth below.
PART 1435--SUGAR PROGRAM
? 1. The authority for 7 CFR part 1435 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1359aa-1359jj and 7272 et seq.; 15 U.S.C.
714b and 714c.
Subpart A--General Provisions
? 2. In Sec. 1435.2, revise the definitions of ``ability to market,''
``market or marketing'', and ``sugar'' to read as follows:
Sec. 1435.2 Definitions.
* * * * *
[[Page 55063]]
Ability to market means, for purposes of determining the State cane
sugar allotments and sugarcane processor allocations for Hawaii and
Puerto Rico, the estimated quantity of sugar, raw value, as CCC
determines, that will be produced in the cane State or by the sugarcane
processor, as appropriate, during the applicable crop year; for
determining the remaining State cane sugar allotments, the highest
single year of sugar production for the State during the 1999 through
2003 crop years; for determining the sugarcane processor allocations
for mainland cane States other than Louisiana, the highest single year
of sugar production for the processor during the 1999 through 2003 crop
years; and, for determining the sugarcane processor allocations for
Louisiana, the simple average of two amounts for each processor,
including:
(1) The production of sugar for the processor, stated in short
tons, raw value, during Crop Year 2003, as determined by CCC; and
(2) The simple average of 3 years of the processor's production of
sugar, stated in short tons, raw value, from among the 1999 through
2003 crop years, excluding the year in which the production was the
highest and the year in which the production was the lowest. With
respect to the 2003 crop year, each processor's production shall be the
same as determined under paragraph (1).
* * * * *
Market or marketing means the transfer of title associated with the
sale or other disposition of sugar in United States commerce, including
the forfeiture of sugar loan collateral under Subpart B, and for any
integrated processor and refiner, the movement of raw cane sugar into
the refining process.
* * * * *
Sugar means any grade or type of saccharine product derived,
directly or indirectly, from sugarcane, sugar beets, sugarcane molasses
or sugar beet molasses and consisting of, or containing, sucrose or
invert sugar, including raw sugar, refined crystalline sugar, edible
molasses, edible cane syrup, liquid sugar, and in-process sugar.
* * * * *
Subpart D--Flexible Marketing Allotments for Sugar
? 3. In Sec. 1435.309 revise paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) to read as
follows:
Sec. 1435.309 Reassignment of deficits.
(a) CCC will determine, from time to time, whether sugar beet or
sugarcane processors will be unable to market their allocations.
(b) Sugar beet and sugar cane processors will report to CCC current
inventories, estimated production, expected marketings, and any other
pertinent factors CCC deems appropriate to determine a processor's
ability to market their allocation.
(c) If CCC determines a sugarcane processor will be unable to
market its fall allocation for the crop year in which an allotment is
in effect, the deficit will be reassigned by June 1:
(1) First, to allocations of other sugarcane processors within that
State based on each processor's initial allocation share of the State's
allotment, but no processor may receive reassigned allocation such that
its allocation exceeds its estimated total sugar supply.
(2) If the deficit cannot be eliminated after reassignment within
the same State, be reassigned to the other cane States based on each
State's initial share of the cane sugar allotment, but no State may
receive reassigned State allotment such that its allocation exceeds its
estimated total sugar supply, with the reassigned quantity to each
State being allocated according to paragraph (c)(1) of this section.
* * * * *
Signed in Washington, DC, on September 1, 2004.
James R. Little,
Executive Vice President, Commodity Credit Corporation.
[FR Doc. 04-20587 Filed 9-10-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-05-P