Jump to main content.

Safety Zone; Rochester Harbor Fireworks, Rochester, NY

Note: EPA no longer updates this information, but it may be useful as a reference or resource.

 [Federal Register: June 2, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 105)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 32239-32241]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr02jn05-10]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR PART 165
[CGD09-05-017]
RIN 1625-AA00
 
Safety Zone; Rochester Harbor Fireworks, Rochester, NY

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone 
encompassing the navigable waters of Rochester Harbor and the Genesee 
River. This safety zone is necessary to ensure the safety of spectators 
and vessels from the hazards associated with fireworks displays. This 
rule will restrict vessel traffic from a portion of Rochester Harbor 
and the Genesee River, Rochester, New York.

DATES: This rule is effective from 9 p.m. until 10 p.m. on June 25, 2005.

ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in 
the docket are part of the docket (CGD09-05-017), and are available for 
inspection or copying at U.S. Coast Guard Marine Safety Office (MSO) 
Buffalo, 1 Fuhrmann Blvd., Buffalo, New York 14203 between 7 a.m. and 3 
p.m. (local), Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: LT Craig A. Wyatt, U.S. Coast Guard 
Marine Safety Office Buffalo, at (716) 843-9570.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Regulatory Information

    We did not publish a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this

[[Page 32240]]

regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good 
cause exists for not publishing an NPRM. This safety zone is temporary 
in nature and limited time existed for an NPRM. Under 5 U.S.C. 
553(d)(3), the Coast Guard also finds that good cause exists for making 
this rule effective less than 30 days after publication in the Federal 
Register. Delaying this rule would be impracticable and contrary to 
public interest since immediate action is needed to minimize potential 
danger to the public during the fireworks demonstration.

Background and Purpose

    Temporary safety zones are necessary to ensure the safety of 
vessels and spectators from the hazards associated with fireworks 
displays. Based on recent accidents that have occurred in other Captain 
of the Port zones, and the explosive hazard of fireworks, the Captain 
of the Port Buffalo has determined fireworks launches in close 
proximity to watercraft pose significant risks to public safety and 
property. The likely combination of large numbers of recreational 
vessels, congested waterways, darkness punctuated by bright flashes of 
light, alcohol use, and debris falling into the water could easily 
result in serious injuries or fatalities. Establishing a safety zone to 
control vessel movement around the locations of the launch platforms 
will help ensure the safety of persons and property at these events and 
help minimize the associated risk.
    The safety zone consists of all navigable waters of Rochester 
Harbor and the Genesee River encompassed by an area 400 yards around 
the West Jetty pier in approximate position: 43[deg]15'40'' N 
077[deg]36'05'' W. All Geographic coordinates are North American Datum 
of 1983 (NAD 83). The size of this zone was determined using the 
National Fire Prevention Association guidelines and local knowledge 
concerning wind, waves, and currents.

Discussion of Rule

    The Coast Guard is establishing a safety zone consisting of a 
portion of the navigable waters of Rochester Harbor and the Genesee 
River. The Coast Guard will notify the public in advance, by way of 
Ninth Coast Guard District Local Notice to Mariners, marine information 
broadcasts, and for those who request it from Marine Safety Office 
Buffalo, by facsimile (fax).

Regulatory Evaluation

    This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section 
3(f) of Executive Order 12866 and does not require an assessment of 
potential costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that order. The 
Office of Management and Budget has not reviewed this rule under that 
order. It is not significant under the regulatory policies and 
procedures of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) (44 FR 11040, 
February 26, 1979). We expect the economic impact of this rule to be so 
minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation under paragraph 10(e) of the 
regulatory policies and procedures of DHS is unnecessary.
    This determination is based on the minimal time that vessels will 
be restricted from the zone, and the zone is in areas where the Coast 
Guard expects insignificant adverse impact to mariners from the zone's 
activation.

Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have 
considered whether this rule will have a significant impact on a 
substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities'' 
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are 
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, 
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
    The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will 
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
entities.
    This rule may affect the following entities, some of which might be 
small entities: The owners or operators of commercial vessels intending 
to transit a portion of an activated safety zone.
    This safety zone will not have a significant economic impact on a 
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons: This 
safety zone is only in effect from 9 p.m. until 10 p.m. (local) on the 
day of the event. Vessel traffic can safely pass outside the safety 
zone during the event. In cases where traffic congestion is greater 
than expected or blocks shipping channels, traffic may be allowed to 
pass through the safety zone under Coast Guard or assisting agency 
escort with the permission of the Captain of the Port Buffalo. 
Additionally, the Coast Guard has not received any negative reports 
from small entities affected during displays in previous years.

Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this rule so that they can better evaluate 
its effects and participate in the rulemaking process. If the rule will 
affect your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction 
and you have questions concerning its provisions or options for 
compliance, please contact Marine Safety Office Buffalo (see ADDRESSES.)
    Small businesses may send comments on actions of Federal employees 
who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal 
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory 
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory 
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and 
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to 
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR 
(1-888-734-3247).

Collection of Information

    This rule calls for no new collection of information under the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

Federalism

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13132 and have 
determined that this rule does not have implications for federalism 
under that Order.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any 
one year. Though this rule does not result in such an expenditure, we 
do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.

Taking of Private Property

    This rule does not effect a taking of private property or otherwise 
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental 
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property Rights.

Civil Justice Reform

    This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) 
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation, 
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

Protection of Children

    The Coast Guard has analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, 
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety 
Risks. This rule is not an economically

[[Page 32241]]

significant rule and does not concern an environmental risk to health 
or risk to safety that may disproportionately affect children.

Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Commandant Instruction M16475.1D, 
which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National 
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f) and have 
determined that there are no factors in this case that limit the use of 
a categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the Instruction. 
Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, 
paragraph (34)(g), of the Instruction from further environmental 
documentation. Paragraph (34)(g) is applicable to this event because 
this rule establishes a safety zone.

Indian Tribal Governments

    This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, 
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more 
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and 
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities 
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

Technical Standards

    The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15 
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards 
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress, 
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why 
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or 
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical 
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or 
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management 
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus 
standards bodies.
    This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not 
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

Energy Effects

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions 
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant 
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant 
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to 
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use 
of energy. It has not been designated by the Administrator of the 
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs as a significant energy 
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects 
under Executive Order 13211.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and record 
keeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

? For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 
CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

? 1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 50 
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g), 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub. 
L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security 
Delegation No. 0170.1

? 2. Add new temporary Sec.  165.T09-017 to read as follows:

Sec.  165.T09-017   Safety Zone; Rochester Harbor Fireworks, Rochester, NY

    (a) Location. The following area is a temporary safety zone: all 
waters of Rochester Harbor and the Genesee River encompassed by an area 
400-yards around the West Jetty pier in approximate position: 
43[deg]15'40'' N, 077[deg]36'05'' W. These coordinates are based upon 
NAD 83.
    (b) Regulations. (1) Entry into or remaining in this zone is 
prohibited unless authorized by the Coast Guard Captain of the Port, 
Buffalo.
    (2) In accordance with the general regulations in Sec.  165.23 of 
this part, entry into this safety zone is prohibited unless authorized 
by the Coast Guard Captain of the Port Buffalo, or his designated on-
scene representative.
    (c) Effective time and date. This section is effective from 9 p.m. 
through 10 p.m. (local) on June 25, 2005.

    Dated: May 18, 2005.
K.C. Burke,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Captain of the Port Buffalo.
[FR Doc. 05-10940 Filed 6-1-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P

 
 

Local Navigation

Jump to main content.