![[logo] US EPA](http://www.epa.gov/epafiles/images/logo_epaseal.gif){kind=logo}
Marten Creek Timber Sales and Associated Activities Kootenai National Forest, Sanders County, MT
Note: EPA no longer updates this information, but it may be useful as a reference or resource.
[Federal Register: June 30, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 125)]
[Notices]
[Page 37745-37746]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr30jn05-34]
========================================================================
Notices
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings,
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents
appearing in this section.
========================================================================
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Marten Creek Timber Sales and Associated Activities Kootenai
National Forest, Sanders County, MT
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The USDA, Forest Service, will prepare an Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) to disclose the environmental effects of timber
harvest, prescribed fire, and watershed rehabilitation in the Marten
Creek project area on the Cabinet Ranger District of the Kootenai
National Forest. The Marten Creek project area is located approximately
7 air miles northwest of Trout Creek, Montana, near the community of
Trout Creek, Montana.
Scoping Comment Date: Comments concerning the scope of the analysis
should be postmarked or received by September 2, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Written comments and suggestions concerning the scope of the
analysis should be sent to Julie Molzahn (jmolzahn@fs.fed.us), District
Ranger, Cabinet Ranger District, 2693 Hwy 200, Trout Creek, Montana, 59874.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dave Clay (dclay@fs.fed.us), Project
Leader, Cabinet Ranger District. Phone: (406) 827-3533.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Marten Creek project area contains
approximately 43,770 acres of land within the Kootenai National Forest
in Sanders County, Montana. The legal location of the Marten Creek
project area is as follows: All or portions of T25N, R34W; T25N, R33W;
T25N, R32W, T24N, R33W, and T24N, R32W; PMM, Sanders County, Montana.
The proposed actions would occur on National Forest lands in the Marten
Creek drainage. All proposed timber harvest activities are outside the
boundaries of any inventoried roadless area or any areas considered for
inclusion to the National Wilderness System as recommended by the
Kootenai National Forest Plan or by any past or present legislative
wilderness proposals, with the exception of approximately 3,878 acres
of underburning-only in the McNeeley and Devil's Gap Inventoried
Roadless Area.
The purpose and need for this project is to: (1) Manage for
vegetation conditions that are suitable for fire-department ecosystems;
(2) Improve and maintain big game winter range; (3) Enhance or maintain
conditions in old growth forest stands; (4) Reduce excess fuel loads in
the Wildland/Urban interface; (5) Improve growing conditions and long
term management of overstocked mid-successional stands; (6) Enhance the
rate of natural recovery of streams; and (7) Contribute forest products
to the local and regional economy.
The Forest Service proposes to harvest timber through application
of a variety of harvest methods of approximately 1,860 acres of
forestland within the Marten Creek project area. Use of existing,
temporary and permanent roads would be needed to access timber harvest
areas. An estimated 47.0 miles of existing roads would be reconstructed
in addition to 7.0 miles of new specified road construction to
facilitate timber removal and improve access for resource management.
An estimated 1.0 miles of temporary road would be constructed and
obliterated following completion of sale related activities. An
additional 7.0 miles of existing road no longer needed for resource
management, at this time, would be decommissioned by various methods,
such as removal of culverts, recontouring, and ripping and seeding. The
method of decommissioning would be selected for each road or portion of
road on a site-specific basis.
Regeneration Harvest: This harvest would leave approximately 20-30
large trees per acre as individual trees and in groups, where feasible,
to provide future snags and down woody material for wildlife habitat. A
total of approximately 303 acres would be harvested through this method.
Intermediate Harvest: This type of harvest would commercially thin
codominant and intermediate trees while retaining a stocked stand of
overstory trees on approximately 1,557 acres.
Underburning: Underburning is proposed on approximately 6,676 acres
outside harvest units to reduce fuel loads and reduce fire risk.
Burning of Natural Fuels and Slash: Burning of natural fuels and
slash resulting from timber harvest is proposed on approximately 1,860
acres.
Watershed/Fish Habitat Improvement: Watershed improvement projects
are proposed for approximately 20 sites on approximately seven miles of
road. These would include removing failed culverts, saturated road
prisms and restoring channels at road crossings. Additional stream
channel restoration projects are proposed on approximately one mile of
the mainstream of Marten Creek and approximately one-half mile of the
South Fork of Marten Creek. Riparian revegetation aimed at providing
bank stability is being proposed on approximately two miles of stream
banks within the middle reaches of Marten and South Fork of Marten
Creek drainage. Reconstruction proposed for the project would apply
Best Management Practices on approximately 47.0 miles of existing road.
Range of Alternatives: The Forest Service will consider a range of
alternatives. One of these will be the ``no action'' alternative in
which none of the proposed activities would be implemented. Additional
alternatives will examine varying levels and locations for the proposed
activities to achieve the proposal's purposes, as well as to respond to
the issues and other resource values.
Public Involvement and Scoping: In July, 2005 preliminary efforts
were made to involve the public in considering management opportunities
within the Marten Creek Decision Area. Comments received prior to this
notice will be included in the documentation for the EIS. This proposal
includes openings greater than 40 acres. A 60 day public review period,
and approval by the Regional Forester for exceeding the 40 acre
limitation for regeneration harvest will occur prior to the signing of
the Record of Decision. This 60 day period is initiated with this
Notice of Intent.
Forest Plan Amendments: The Proposed Action includes two project-
specific Forest Plan amendments
[[Page 37746]]
necessary to meet the project's objectives: (1) An amendment to allow
removal of existing cavity habitat in MA 10 (big game winter range).
This amendment would be needed to allow removal of some snags within
the cutting units. OSHA regulations require that many snags in logging
units be felled to ensure the safety of forest workers. Therefore, we
would anticipate the loss of some but not all standing dead timber for
both safety concerns and harvest system logistics, and this would
reduce ``cavity habitat'' associated with snags in the MA to some degree.
(2) An amendment to allow MA 12 open road density to be managed by
0.80 miles/square mile during project implementation. The amendment
would be needed to suspend Facilities Standard #3, which states
that open road density should be maintained by 0.75 miles/square mile.
The open road density would return to 0.75 following project completion.
Estimated Dates for Filing: The Draft EIS is expected to be filed
with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and available for public
review by March 2006. At that time, EPA will publish a Notice of
Availability of the Draft EIS in the Federal Register. The comment
period on the Draft EIS will be a minimum of 45 days from the date of
EPA publishes the Notice of Availability in the Federal Register. It is
very important that those interested in the management of this area
participate at that time.
The Final EIS is scheduled to be complete by May 2006. In the final
EIS, the Forest Service will respond to comments and responses received
during the comment period that pertain to the environmental
consequences discussed in the Draft EIS and applicable laws, regulations,
and policies considered in making a decision regarding the proposal.
Reviewer's Obligations: The Forest Service believes, at this early
stage, it is important to give reviewers notice of several court
rulings related to public participation in the environmental review
process. First, reviewers of Draft EIS's must structure their
participation in the environmental review of the proposal so that it is
meaningful and alerts an agency to the reviewer's position and
contentions. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519,
553 (1978). Also, environmental objections that could be raised at the
Draft EIS stage but that are not raised until after completion of the
Final EIS may be waived or dismissed by the courts. City of Angoon v.
Hodel, 803 F.2d 1016, 1022 (9th cir. 1986) and Wisconsin Heritages,
Inc. v. Harris, 490 F. Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980). Because of
these court rulings, it is very important that those interested in this
proposed action participate by the close of the Draft EIS 45 day
comment period so that substantive comments and objections are made
available to the Forest Service at a time when it can meaningfully
consider and respond to them in the Final EIS.
To assist the Forest Service in identifying and considering issues
and concerns on the proposed action, comments on the draft
environmental impact statements should be as specific as possible. It
is also helpful if comments refer to specific pages or chapters of the
draft statement. Comments may also address the adequacy of the Draft
EIS or the merits of the alternatives formulated and discussed in the
statements. Reviewers may wish to refer to the Council on Environmental
Quality regulations for implementing the procedural provisions of the
National Environmental Policy Act at 40 CFR 1503.3 in addressing these
points.
Comments received, including the names and addresses of those who
comment, will be considered part of the public record on this proposal
and will be available for public inspection.
(Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7 and 1508.22; Forest Service handbook
1909.15, Section 21.)
Responsible Official: As the Forest Supervisor of the Kootenai
National Forest, 1101 U.S. Highway 2 West, Libby, MT 59923, I am the
Responsible Official. As the Responsible Official, I will decide if the
proposal project will be implemented. I will document the decision and
reasons for the decision in the Record of Decision. That decision will
be subject to Forest Service Appeal Regulations. I have delegated the
responsibility for preparing the DEIS and FEIS to Julie Molzahn,
District Ranger, Cabinet Ranger District, 2963 Hwy 200, Trout Creek,
Montana 59874.
Dated: June 22, 2005.
Bob Castaneda,
Forest Supervisor, Kootenai National Forest.
[FR Doc. 05-12892 Filed 6-29-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M