Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for the Calexico West Port of Entry Expansion/Renovation, Calexico, California
Note: EPA no longer updates this information, but it may be useful as a reference or resource.
[Federal Register: February 27, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 38)]
[Notices]
[Page 9825-9826]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr27fe06-61]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for the
Calexico West Port of Entry Expansion/Renovation, Calexico, California
AGENCY: Public Buildings Service, GSA
ACTION: Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS) and Public Scoping Meeting
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The General Services Administration (GSA) announces its intent
to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the expansion/
renovation of the Calexico West Port of Entry (POE), located in
Calexico, California. The purpose of the expansion/renovation is to
reduce traffic congestion in Calexico and Mexicali city centers caused
by vehicles crossing the border, to improve border security; and to
provide safe, secure, and efficient operational areas for the public
and Federal employees. This facility serves both vehicular and
pedestrian traffic into and out of the Mexican city of Mexicali. The
need for this expansion/renovation derives from the substantial
increase in its use by international travelers. The existing POE is not
equipped to process this increase within an acceptable level of service
consistent with the Federal Inspection Service's minimum standards.
Problems at the current facility are mostly related to inadequate space
for inspection operations, equipment, and personnel. The facility also
requires seismic retrofitting.
The EIS will address potential environmental impacts of the
alternatives for the proposed project related to geology and soils,
water resources, land use, biological resources, cultural resources,
visual resources, infrastructure, traffic, air quality, noise, human
health and safety, socioeconomics, and environmental justice. The
existing contamination of the New River and traffic congestion have
been identified as potential environmental impacts. Information
regarding other potential environmental impacts will be gathered during
the public scoping process.
DATES: The views and comments of the public are necessary in
determining the
[[Page 9826]]
scope and content of the environmental analysis in connection with the
proposed project. A public scoping meeting for the proposed project
will be held on Wednesday, March 8, 2006 from 3 to 6 p.m. at the
Calexico City Hall, 608 Heber Avenue in Calexico, California.
Interested parties may attend to present questions and concerns that
they believe should be addressed in the EIS. Comments and questions can
also be submitted to the Point of Contact (see the ADDRESS section
below). Due to time limits mandated by Federal law, responses to
scoping are requested no later than 45 days after publication of this
notice. It is anticipated that the Draft EIS will be available for
public review and comment in January of 2007.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments and questions to Mr. Morris Angell, Regional
Environmental Quality Advisor, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, 3rd Floor East,
San Francisco, California, 94102, 415-522-3473, morris.angell@gsa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you require additional information
regarding the public scoping meeting or the proposed project, or
require special assistance to attend the meeting, please contact Morris
Angell, GSA Regional Environmental Quality Advisor, (see the ADDRESS
section above).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: GSA is proposing two alternative actions: 1)
construct a new vehicle and pedestrian inspection facility on the
existing site and federally owned vacant land immediately to the west
of the current facility, and 2) a ``no action'' alternative. Under the
``no action'' alternative, the existing facilities and their operation
will remain unchanged.
Dated: February 10, 2006.
Peter G. Stamison,
Regional Administrator, Public Buildings Service, Pacific Rim Region.
Dated: February 10, 2006.
Jeffrey Neely,
Assistant Regional Administrator, Public Buildings Service, Pacific Rim
Region.
[FR Doc. E6-2694 Filed 2-24-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-YF-S
![[logo] US EPA](http://www.epa.gov/epafiles/images/logo_epaseal.gif)