Special Local Regulation; Annual Gasparilla Marine Parade, Hillsborough Bay, Tampa, FL
Note: EPA no longer updates this information, but it may be useful as a reference or resource.
[Federal Register: July 7, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 130)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 38561-38563]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr07jy06-24]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[CGD 07-05-156]
RIN 1625-AA08
Special Local Regulation; Annual Gasparilla Marine Parade,
Hillsborough Bay, Tampa, FL
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to amend the permanent special local
regulation for the Annual Gasparilla Marine Parade, Hillsborough Bay,
and Tampa Bay, FL. This proposed rule would change the date of the
event by moving it up one week, from the first weekend in February to
the last weekend in January. Additionally, this regulation will create
a parade staging area and a 50 foot safety zone around officially
entered parade boats during the parade. This action is necessary
because the date on which the parade is held annually has changed.
Restricting access to the parade staging area box is necessary to
ensure the official parade boats are properly lined up to begin the
parade. A 50 foot safety zone around officially entered parade boats is
necessary to ensure the safety of the parade participants due to safety
concerns caused by an increasing number of spectator vessels that
gather to watch the parade.
DATES: Comments and related material must reach the Coast Guard on or
before September 5, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may mail comments and related material to Coast Guard
Sector St. Petersburg, Prevention Department, 155 Columbia Drive,
Tampa, Florida 33606-3598. The Waterways Management Division maintains
the public docket for this rulemaking. Comments and material received
from the public, as well as documents indicated in this preamble as
being available in the docket, will become part of this docket and will
be available for inspection or copying at Coast Guard Sector St.
Petersburg between 7:30 a.m. and 3:30 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Waterways Management Division at Coast
Guard Sector St. Petersburg, (813) 228-2191, Ext. 8307.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related material. If you do so, please include your name
and address, identify the docket number for this rulemaking (CGD 07-05-
156), indicate the specific section of this document to which each
comment applies, and give the reason for each comment. Please submit
all comments and related material in an unbound format, no larger than
8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for copying. If you would like to know
they reached us, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope. We will consider all comments and material received during
the comment period. We may change this proposed rule in view of them.
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for a meeting by writing to Coast Guard Sector St. Petersburg
at the address under ADDRESSES explaining why one would be beneficial.
If we determine that one would aid this rulemaking, we will hold one at
a time and place announced by a later notice in the Federal Register.
Background and Purpose
The Annual Gasparilla Marine Parade is currently held annually on
the first Saturday in February and is governed by a permanent
regulation published at 33 CFR 100.734. The Annual Gasparilla Marine
Parade has been moved permanently to the last Saturday in January. Law
enforcement officials have also identified a need for a parade staging
area for vessels officially entered in the parade. This area would
prohibit vessels not officially entered in the parade from entering the
area and allow for the safe movement and lineup of the official boats
prior to the start of the parade. Law enforcement personnel also
identified a need for a 50 foot safety zone around all official parade
boats during the parade due to safety concerns associated with an
increased number of spectator vessels that gather to watch the parade.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
This rule is necessary to accommodate the change in the date of the
event, to create a parade staging area, and to create a 50 foot safety
area around all official parade boats. The regulation would change the
enforcement date from the first Saturday in February to the last
Saturday in January. It would also prohibit vessels not officially
entered in the parade from entering the parade staging area and
[[Page 38562]]
prohibit vessels from entering within 50 feet of all officially entered
parade boats during the parade without prior permission of Coast Guard
Sector St. Petersburg.
Regulatory Evaluation
This proposed rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits
under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that Order. It is not ``significant''
under the regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of
Homeland Security (DHS).
We expect the economic impact of this proposed rule to be so
minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation under the regulatory policies
and procedures of DHS is unnecessary. The short duration of this
regulation would have little, if any, economic impact.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this proposed rule would have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This rule will effect the following entities,
some of which may be small entities: The owners or operators of vessels
intending to transit or anchor in a portion of Hillsborough Bay and its
tributaries north of a line drawn along latitude 27[deg]51[min]18[sec]
(Coordinates Reference Datum: NAD 1983).
The amendments to the current existing regulation will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
for the following reasons. This rule is effective for one day and only
commercial marine traffic will be precluded from entering the regulated
area. Before the effective period, we will issue maritime advisories
widely available to users of the waterway.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule so that they can better
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the
rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact 1-888-REG-FAIR (1-888-734-3247).
The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that question
or complain about this rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this proposed rule
under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications
for federalism. The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C.
1531-1538) requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their
discretionary regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses
actions that may result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal
government, in the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000
or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not affect a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did
[[Page 38563]]
not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination that there are no factors in this
case that would limit the use of a categorical exclusion under section
2.B.2 of the Instruction. Therefore, we believe that this rule should
be categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(h), of the
Instruction, from further environmental documentation. As a special
local regulation issued in conjunction with a marine parade, this
proposed rule satisfies the requirements of paragraph (34)(h).
Under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(h), of the Instruction, an
``Environmental Analysis Check List'' is not required for this rule.
Comments on this section will be considered before we make the final
decision on whether to categorically exclude this rule from further
environmental review.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 100 as follows:
PART 100--MARINE EVENTS & REGATTAS
1. The authority citation for part 100 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Revise Sec. 100.734 to read as follows:
Sec. 100.734 Annual Gasparilla Marine Parade; Hillsborough Bay,
Tampa, FL.
(a) Regulated Area. A regulated area is established consisting of
all waters of Hillsborough Bay and its tributaries north of 27[deg]
51'18'' north latitude. The regulated area includes the following in
their entirety: Hillsborough Cut ``D'' Channel, Seddon Channel and the
Hillsborough River south of the John F. Kennedy Bridge. All coordinates
referenced use datum: NAD 83.
(b) Special local regulations. (1) Entrance into the regulated area
is prohibited to all commercial marine traffic from 9 a.m. to 2:30 p.m.
EST on the date of the event.
(2) The regulated area is a ``no wake'' zone.
(3) All vessels within the regulated area shall stay 50 feet away
from and give way to all officially entered vessels in parade formation
in the Gasparilla Marine Parade.
(4) When within the marked channels of the parade route, vessels
participating in the Gasparilla Marine Parade may not exceed the
minimum speed necessary to maintain steerage.
(5) Jet skis and vessels without mechanical propulsion are
prohibited from the parade route.
(6) Northbound vessels in excess of 80 feet in length without
mooring arrangements made prior to the date of the event are prohibited
from entering Seddon Channel unless the vessel is officially entered in
the Gasparilla Marine Parade. All northbound vessels in excess of 80
feet without prior mooring arrangements and not officially entered in
the Gasparilla Marine Parade must use the alternate route through
Sparkman Channel.
(7) Vessels not officially entered in the Gasparilla Marine Parade
may not enter the Parade staging area box within the following coordinates:
27[deg]53'53'' N 082[deg]27'47'' W
27[deg]53'22'' N 082[deg]27'10'' W
27[deg]52'36'' N 082[deg]27'55'' W
27[deg]53'02'' N 082[deg]28'31'' W
(c) Enforcement Period. This section will be enforced from 9 a.m.
until 2:30 p.m. EST, annually on the last Saturday in the month of January.
Dated: June 20, 2006.
D.W. Kunkel,
RADM, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Seventh Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. E6-10583 Filed 7-6-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P
![[logo] US EPA](http://www.epa.gov/epafiles/images/logo_epaseal.gif)