![[logo] US EPA](http://www.epa.gov/epafiles/images/logo_epaseal.gif){kind=logo}
Notice of Availability of a Draft Integrated System Investment Plan and Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement for the Ohio River Mainstem System Study
Note: EPA no longer updates this information, but it may be useful as a reference or resource.
[Federal Register: May 26, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 102)]
[Notices]
[Page 30391-30393]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr26my06-64]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army; Corps of Engineers
Notice of Availability of a Draft Integrated System Investment
Plan and Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement for the Ohio River
Mainstem System Study
AGENCY: Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: a. Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA),
the Great Lakes and Ohio River Division of the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) is seeking comments on a draft System Investment Plan
and Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (SIP/PEIS) that
evaluates alternative investment strategies for the maintenance of
commercial navigation infrastructure along with the ecosystem
sustainability needs on the Ohio River System for the next 60 years.
b. The primary purpose of the Ohio River Mainstem Systems Study
(ORMSS) is to develop the best SIP for maintaining safe,
environmentally sustainable, and reliable navigation on the Ohio River
over a 60-year period from 2010 to 2070. The study evaluated the
operation and maintenance, rehabilitation, and construction
reinvestment needs at the 19 navigation lock and dam sites on the Ohio
River Mainstem. The study reports on five plans for meeting these needs
based on five different traffic forecast scenarios. The future reliable
operation of these structures is critical to the continued growth in
commercial navigation throughout the Ohio River basin. In response to
stakeholder input, the study purpose was modified to include the
identification of measures to improve ecological sustainability to
provide a balance between economic and environmental improvements.
c. In order to facilitate review, the Corps will be conducting six
public meetings along the Ohio River to solicit comments on its proposed
plan. (See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for dates, times and locations).
d. The Corps will be providing copies of the SIP/PEIS at numerous
locations for review by the public. (See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for
locations).
e. The review and comment period for this draft document will be 60
days.
DATES: Submit comments on or before July 25, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Send all written comments and queries concerning this draft
report to Mr. Jeffrey Benedict, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
Pittsburgh District, William S. Morehead Building, 1000 Liberty Avenue,
Pittsburgh, PA 15222-4186. Telephone: (412) 395-7202. Electronic mail:
celrl-ormss@lrl02.usace.army.mil. Fax: (412) 644-2673.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Veronica Rife, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, Louisville District, 600 Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Place,
Louisville, KY 40202. Telephone: (502) 315-6785. Electronic mail:
celrl-ormss@lrl02.usace.army.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
1. Authority: The proposed action is being conducted under the
authority of United States Senate, Committee on Public Works resolution
dated May 16, 1955; and United States House of Representatives, Committee
on Public Works and Transportation resolution dated March 11, 1982.
2. Background: a. The ORMSS draft report is an integrated System
Investment Plan (SIP) and Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement
(PEIS). The PEIS is centered on a system-wide Cumulative Effects
Assessment (CEA) and other studies that focused on
[[Page 30392]]
specific issues identified through the study scoping process.
b. A variety of stakeholders participated in the development of the
study through forums as varied as public meetings and workshops with
industry groups, environmental groups, and academia. The ORMSS study
team has solicited input and shared work with interested stakeholders
through various communication channels.
c. The major engineering and economic variables in developing a
system investment plan for the mainstem locks are lock condition and
traffic demand. Forecasts of both variables are uncertain giving rise
to the need for a risk based analysis to insure that the study
conclusions and recommendations cover the plausible range of future
scenarios. Engineering reliability models were used to analyze lock
component reliability and capture the uncertainty of lock performance
while accommodating forecasted traffic demand. Multiple traffic
forecasts were used to model river traffic. Five forecasts were
developed for the study, each recognizing that the primary driver of
river traffic is utility coal at 50-60% of system tonnage transported.
d. The with-project condition (WPC) is the plan that best addresses
the stated planning objectives and addresses the problems and
opportunities. The planning objectives were: Ensuring Future
Navigability, Improving Navigation Efficiency, and Enhancing
Environmental Sustainability. To achieve these objectives, the study
team developed and evaluated alternative actions ranging from proactive
maintenance and small scale improvements to large-scale construction
reinvestments. Proactive maintenance occurs when lock components are
replaced or a lock is rehabilitated in advance of component(s) failure.
Small-scale improvements considered include floating buoys, permanent
mooring cells near lock approach points, and other infrastructure or
procedural opportunities. Large-scale reinvestments evaluated include
chamber rehabilitations, construction of new larger lock chambers, and
600 extensions of some auxiliary lock chambers.
e. Two ecosystem sustainability alternatives were formulated for
the WPC analysis to address long-term sustainability of aquatic and
riparian ecological resources. The Moderate and Maximum Ecosystem
Sustainability Related plans were developed based on expected costs,
need for modified or additional authority, complexity, and several
scientific, policy, funding and timing uncertainties of various
measures. A total of 26 ecosystem sustainability measures were
evaluated; 12 specific types of measures in addition to the 14 from the
Without Project Condition (WOPC). The Moderate plan included 19 of the
measures and the Maximum Plan consists of all 26 measures.
f. The WOPC is the most likely condition expected to exist in the
future in the absence of implementation of water resource project
investment alternative(s). The future WOPC constitutes the benchmark
against which alternative plans are evaluated. For this study, the WOPC
was formulated as the least Federal cost plan providing viable
navigation on the Ohio River Mainstem. The WOPC as developed is a
reactive maintenance strategy for major lock components. This assumes
that as a component fails, it is repaired in a timely fashion; however,
no proactive maintenance is performed, i.e., components are not
repaired or replaced in anticipation of failure.
g. The ORMSS draft SIP recommendations follow:
? Increase Operation and Maintenance (O&M) investments to
maximize economic efficiency. Complete all authorized navigation
improvements; Olmsted, JT Myers, McAlpine, Greenup, Lower Monongahela,
Kentucky Lock and Chickamauga.
? Provide optimal funding for the Upper Ohio River Study
currently underway in order for this project to be included in a WRDA
in the FY 2010 time frame.
? Initiate main chamber rehabilitation studies for Meldahl,
Hannibal, and Myers and complete by 2009. Initiation of design of these
efforts should begin in 2010.
? Pursue planning and implementation of measures to improve
environmental sustainability in collaboration with other interests.
? Initiate preparation of the Program Implementation Plan
for the Ohio River Ecosystem Restoration Program.
? Incorporate all Reasonable and Prudent Measures into the
Operation and Maintenance of the river.
? Complete work on the Markland gates as soon as possible.
Funds provided in FY 2006 will initiate design and continued funding in
FY 2007 and 2008 will construct the gates and place them in service.
? All detailed evaluation of site-specific impacts for
follow on studies and other actions would be tiered from the SIP/PEIS.
? Initiate the Ohio River Basin Comprehensive Study in order
to assess water resource opportunities throughout the basin in
collaboration with other interests. Planning efforts should include
identification and evaluation of opportunities to improve environmental
sustainability throughout the basin including the tributaries.
? Establish a stand alone program (Ohio River Navigation
System Investment Program) to update the data and models used in
preparing the System Investment Plan. Expand the program capability to
include the Ohio River dams and include tributary (Allegheny,
Monogahela, Kanawha, Green, Tennessee and Cumberland Rivers) locks and
dam structures to support navigation investment decisions and manage
future system risk. Use these tools in annual budget formulation.
? Use the Ohio River Navigation System Investment Program to
reexamine the medium and long term needs identified in the SIP to
optimize investments on these projects.
? All detailed evaluation of site-specific impacts for
follow on studies and other actions would be tiered from the SIP/PEIS.
? The System Investment Plan was not developed considering a
constrained federal budget or considering the total Ohio River System.
Follow on actions need to be conducted to analyze investment strategies
with a constrained federal budget and expanded to include all navigation
locks, dams and channels on the Ohio River and its navigable tributaries.
3. Public Participation: a. In order to facilitate review, the
Corps will be conducting six public meetings along the Ohio River to
solicit comments on this proposed plan. The meeting dates, times and
locations are:
? June 19, 2006. Open Forum 6 p.m. to 7 p.m., Public Meeting
7 p.m. to 9 p.m., Community College of Beaver County, Allied Health
Building Auditorium, One Campus Drive, Monaca, PA 15061.
? June 20, 2006, Open Forum 6 p.m. to 7 p.m., Public Meeting
7 p.m. to 9 p.m., Holiday Inn, 701 Pike Street, Marieta, OH 45750.
? June 21, 2006, Open Forum 6 p.m. to 7 p.m., Public Meeting
7 p.m. to 9 p.m., Big Sandy Superstore Arena, 3rd Ave. and 8th Street,
Huntington, WV 25701.
? June 27, 2006, Opera Forum 6 p.m. to 7 p.m., Public
Meeting 7 p.m. to 9 p.m., Banterra Bank--Large Conference Room, 101
West Eighth Street, Metropolis, IL 62960.
[[Page 30393]]
? June 28, 2006, Open Forum 6 p.m. to 7 p.m., Public Meeting
7 p.m. to 9 p.m. Victory Theater, 5th Floor Banquet Room, 600 Main
Street, Evansville, IN 47708.
? June 29, 2006, Open Forum 6 p.m. to 6:30 p.m., Public
Meeting 6:30 p.m. to 8:30 p.m., Kenton County Public Library--Large
Meeting Room, 505 Scott Blvd., Covington, KY 41011.
b. The Corps will be providing copies of the SIP/PEIS at numerous
locations for review by the public. All locations can be found on the
Web at: http://www.lrl.usace.army.mil/ORMSS/ 
, by e-mailing
an inquiry to celrl-ormss@lrl02.usace.army.mil or by calling Jane Ruhl
at (502) 315-6862.
c. In addition, the public can download a copy of the document off
the Web at: http://www.lrl.usace.army.mil/ORMSS/ .
Brenda S. Bowen,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 06-4884 Filed 5-25-06; 8:45am]
BILLING CODE 3710-GM-M