Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Environmental Assessment for Stone Lakes National Wildlife Refuge
Note: EPA no longer updates this information, but it may be useful as a reference or resource.
[Federal Register: September 25, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 185)]
[Notices]
[Page 55801-55802]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr25se06-37]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Environmental
Assessment for Stone Lakes National Wildlife Refuge
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Department of the Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) announces that a
Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Environmental Assessment
(Draft CCP/EA) for Stone Lakes National Wildlife Refuge (Refuge) is
available for review and comment. Also available for review with the
Draft CCP/EA are draft compatibility determinations for fishing;
wildlife observation and photography; environmental education and
interpretation; high-speed boating; recreational boating associated
with hunting, fishing, wildlife observation and photography; research;
plant gathering; and mosquito monitoring and control.
DATES: Written comments must be received at the address below by
October 28, 2006. In addition, two public meetings will be held on
October 4 and October 5, 2006 from 7 p.m. to 9 p.m. in California.
ADDRESSES: For more information on obtaining documents and submitting
comments, see ``Review and Comment'' under SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
For public meeting location see ``Public Meetings.''
FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom Harvey, Project Leader at the Stone
Lakes NWR address under ``Review and Comment'' or David Bergendorf,
Refuge Planner, at the CA/NV Refuge Planning Office address under
``Review and Comment'' or at (916) 414-6503 (telephone).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This Draft CCP/EA, prepared pursuant to the
National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966, as amended
by the National Wildlife Refuge Improvement Act of 1997 (16 U.S.C 668dd
et seq.) as amended and the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(42 U.S.C. 4321-4347) as amended, describes the Service's proposal for
managing the Refuge for the next 15 years.
Review and Comment
Copies of the Draft CCP/EA may be obtained by writing to the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service, Attn: David Bergendorf, CA/NV Refuge
Planning Office, 2800 Cottage Way, W-1832, Sacramento, CA 95825-1846.
Copies of the Draft CCP/EA may be viewed at this address or at Stone
Lakes National Wildlife Refuge, 1624 Hood-Franklin Road, Elk Grove, CA
95758. The Draft CCP/EA will also be available for viewing and
downloading online at http://www.fws.gov/stonelakes/publicreview.htm.
Printed documents will also be available for review at the following
libraries: Sacramento Central Library, 828 I Street, Sacramento, CA
95814; Arden-Dimick Library, 891 Watt Avenue, Sacramento, CA 95864;
Belle Cooledge Library, 5600 South Land Park Drive, Sacramento, CA
95822; Elk Grove Library, 8962 Elk Grove Blvd., Elk Grove, CA 95624;
Clarksburg Yolo County Library, 52915 Netherlands Road, Clarksburg, CA
95612; Colonial Heights Library, 4799 Stockton Blvd., Sacramento, CA
95820; Courtland Library Neighborhood Library, 170 Primasing Avenue,
Courtland, CA 95615; and the Galt Branch Library (Marian O. Lawrence
Library), 1000 Caroline Avenue, Galt, CA 95632.
Comments on the Draft CCP/EA should be addressed to: David
[[Page 55802]]
Bergendorf, Refuge Planner, 2800 Cottage Way, W-1832, Sacramento, CA
95825-1846. Comments may also be faxed to (916) 414-6497 or submitted
via electronic mail to david_bergendorf@fws.gov. If submitting
comments by fax, please address to Attn: David Bergendorf, re: Stone
Lakes NWR CCP. If submitting electronic mail, please type ``Stone Lakes
NWR CCP'' in the subject line.
Public Meetings
Our two public meetings will take place at the Elk Grove Community
Services District, Administration Building, boardroom located at 8820
Elk Grove Blvd., Elk Grove, CA 95624.
Background
The Refuge was established in 1994 under the authority of the
Emergency Wetlands Resources Act of 1986, the Fish and Wildlife Act of
1956, the Migratory Bird Conservation Act and the Endangered Species
Act of 1973. The Refuge boundary encompasses 17,600 acres; this
includes a core Refuge area of about 9,000 acres and a 9,000-acre
cooperative Wildlife Management Area that encompasses land managed by
other agencies in concert with Refuge purposes. The Service actively
manages about 6,000 acres. The Refuge is located in the Beach-Stone
Lakes Basin within the Sacramento Valley in southwestern Sacramento
County; it lies about 10 miles south of the city of Sacramento,
straddling Interstate 5 from the town of Freeport south to Lost Slough.
Purpose and Need for Action
The Service prepared the Stone Lakes NWR Draft CCP to guide
management of wildlife, other natural resources, and public use on the
Refuge for the next 15 years. The CCP is flexible; it will be revised
periodically to ensure that its goals, objectives, implementation
strategies and timetables remain valid and appropriate. Major revisions
require and provide a process for public involvement and National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) review, if needed.
Alternatives
The draft EA/CCP presents an evaluation of the environmental
effects of three alternatives for managing the Stone Lakes National
Wildlife Refuge for the next 15 years. The Service proposes to
implement Alternative B, as described in the EA. Alternative B best
achieves the Refuges' purposes, vision, and goals; contributes to the
Refuge System mission; addresses the significant issues and relevant
mandates; and is consistent with principles of sound fish and wildlife
management. This alternative is described in more detail in the CCP.
There are many features of proposed Refuge management that are
common to all three alternatives. Features common to all alternatives
include ongoing coordination with the Sacramento/Yolo Mosquito and
Vector Control District on mosquito control, ongoing weed management
including coordination with the Stone Lakes Water Hyacinth Control
Group, implementation of a hunt program, vernal pool management,
boating access with a no-wake zone on all Refuge waters, and riparian
habitat maintenance and restoration. There are also many features of
each alternative that are distinct.
Alternative A, the no action alternative, assumes no change from
current management programs and is considered the baseline to compare
other alternatives against. Under Alternative A, the primary management
focus of the Refuge would continue to be providing habitat for
migrating, wintering and nesting migratory and resident birds with an
emphasis on waterbirds and endangered species by restoring and
maintaining wetland, riparian woodland and grassland habitats, and
valuable agricultural lands. The Refuge would continue to offer limited
wildlife-dependent recreation, including volunteer participation in
restoration, limited wildlife observation and photography, limited
environmental education and interpretative programs, and hunting, with
emphasis on youth and disabled hunters.
Under Alternative B, the Refuge would continue its current focus of
providing wintering habitat for migratory birds and management to
benefit endangered species. Management programs for migratory birds and
other Central Valley wildlife would be expanded and improved and public
use opportunities would also be expanded. The number of units open to
the public would increase from one to five. In addition, environmental
education, interpretation, wildlife observation, wildlife photography,
hunting, and fishing programs would be expanded.
Under Alternative C, the Refuge would continue to focus on
providing wintering habitat for migratory birds and managing for
endangered species while placing a greater emphasis on historic
conditions in management and habitat restoration activities.
Opportunities for the six priority public uses: Hunting, fishing,
wildlife observation and photography, environmental education and
interpretation, would be expanded beyond both Alternatives A and B.
Public Comments
After the review and comment period ends for this Draft CCP/EA,
comments will be analyzed by the Service and addressed in the Final
CCP. All comments received from individuals, including names and
addresses, become part of the official public record and may be
released. Requests for such comments will be handled in accordance with
the Freedom of Information Act, the Council on Environmental Quality's
NEPA regulations, and other Service and Departmental policies and
procedures.
Dated: July 31, 2006.
Margaret T. Kolar,
Acting Manager, California/Nevada Operations, Sacramento, California.
[FR Doc. 06-8159 Filed 9-22-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
![[logo] US EPA](http://www.epa.gov/epafiles/images/logo_epaseal.gif)