![[logo] US EPA](http://www.epa.gov/epafiles/images/logo_epaseal.gif){kind=logo}
Preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement for the Berkeley/Albany Ferry Terminal Project in the Cities of Berkeley and Albany, California
Note: EPA no longer updates this information, but it may be useful as a reference or resource.
[Federal Register: February 12, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 28)]
[Notices]
[Page 6659-6660]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr12fe07-144]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Transit Administration
Preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement for the Berkeley/Albany
Ferry Terminal Project in the Cities of Berkeley and Albany, California
AGENCY: U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT), Federal Transit
Administration (FTA).
ACTION: Notice of Intent (NOI) to prepare an Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Federal Transit Administration and the San Francisco Bay
Water Transit Authority (WTA) are planning to prepare an Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS) for the proposed construction of a ferry
terminal along the Berkeley/Albany waterfront that would link the San
Francisco Ferry Terminal with communities in the East Bay. The project
would serve commuters, visitors, and recreational users who desire an
alternative way to cross San Francisco Bay to access nearby employment,
entertainment, and recreational destinations. The EIS will be prepared
in accordance with section 102(2)C of the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (NEPA) and pursuant to the Council on the Environmental
Quality's regulations (40 CFR parts 1500-08) as well as provisions of
the recently enacted Safe, Accountable, Flexible Efficient
Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users. (SAFETEA-LU). The
purpose of this Notice of Intent (NOI) is to alert interested parties
regarding the plan to prepare an EIS, to provide information on the
proposed transit project, to invite participation in the EIS process,
including comments on the scope of the EIS proposed in this notice, and
to announce public scoping meetings will be conducted.
DATES: Written comments on the scope of the EIS should be sent to John
Sindzinski, WTA Project Manager, by March 30, 2007. Public scoping
meetings will be held on March 8, 2007, and March 15, 2007, from 6:30
pm to 8:30 pm at locations indicated under the heading ADDRESSES below.
An interagency scoping meeting for agencies with interest in the
project will be held on March 7 from 1:30 pm to 3:30 pm at the South
Berkeley Senior Center, 2939 Ellis Street, Berkeley, California.
ADDRESSES: Written comments on the scope of the EIS should be sent to
John Sindzinski, Project Manager, San Francisco Bay Water Transit
Authority, Pier 9, Suite 111, The Embarcadero, San Francisco, CA 94111.
Comments may also be offered at the public scoping meetings. The
addresses for the public scoping meetings are as follows:
Albany Location (March 15)
Albany City Hall, 1000 San Pablo Avenue, Albany, California.
Berkeley Location (March 8)
North Berkeley Senior Center, 1901 Hearst Avenue, Berkeley, California.
The meeting will be accessible to persons with disabilities. If
special translation or signing services or other special accommodations
are needed, please contact Delphine Henri at (415) 274-1821 at least 48
hours before the meeting. A scoping information packet is available on the
Water Transit Authority Web site at http://www.watertransit.org 
or by calling Delphine Henri (415) 274-1821. Copies will also be available
at the scoping meetings.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alex Smith, Community Planner, Federal
Transit Administration, San Francisco Regional Office at (415) 744-2599.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Proposed Project: The project would
initiate ferry service between the East Bay communities of Berkeley/
Albany and the San Francisco Ferry Terminal administered by the WTA.
Service would operate during the day and evenings, including Saturdays
and Sundays, at headways that would reflect the travel demand for
commute and non-commute periods. Depending on the Berkeley/Albany
terminal site selected, one-way travel times would range from
approximately 30 and 45 minutes. The project would involve constructing
a new ferry docking facility; passenger ticketing and sheltered waiting
area on the pier; car and bike parking; bus boarding; and provision for
pedestrian, bicycle and traffic circulation at a location along the
Berkeley/Albany waterfront. Dredging would be conducted to allow ferry
vessels access to the terminal site. In San Francisco, existing San
Francisco Ferry Terminal facilities would be utilized for this new
service and would not require modification.
Purpose and Need for the Proposed Project: In July 2003, the WTA
finalized the Implementation and Operations Plan (IOP) to expand ferry
service throughout San Francisco Bay. The IOP included ferry service
between San Francisco and Berkeley/Albany as an element of a regional
ferry network. Regional Measure 2, approved by local voters in March 2,
2004, earmarked funds for developing a comprehensive strategy to
address congestion on Transbay corridors. The San Francisco to
Berkeley/Albany ferry service was designated as a priority
transportation project in carrying out this strategy. The project would:
? Provide an alternative mode of transportation that would
encourage automobile users to forego traveling by car across the Bay
Bridge, thus reducing congestion on the Bay Bridge
? Provide additional Transbay capacity to existing BART and
AC Transit services
? Provide an alternative way of crossing the Bay during
regional emergencies
? Provide direct access for San Francisco residents to the Eastshore
State Park and other activity centers in the Berkeley/Albany area
? Provide direct access for East Bay residents to employment
and activity centers along and near the San Francisco waterfront
Alternatives: A study of potential ferry terminal sites in the
Berkeley/Albany area was completed by the WTA in July 2006. The Berkeley/
Albany Ferry Terminal Study is available on the Water Transit Authority
Web site at http://www.watertransit.org. On July 27,
2006, four sites were approved by the WTA Board to be carried forward as
alternatives for further review and environmental analysis in the EIS.
In addition to the No Build alternative, four Build alternatives are
being considered in the EIS as described below.
1. No Build Alternative: This alternative would continue the
existing transit services connecting the East Bay communities of
Berkeley/Albany with San Francisco without implementing ferry service.
Programmed bus and rail transit improvements between the East Bay and
San Francisco identified in the Regional Transportation Plan would be
implemented as part of the No Build alternative. This alternative
serves as the baseline against which the environmental effects of the
other alternatives are measured.
2. Alternative A--Berkeley Marina Site. This alternative would
include a new terminal and docking facilities at the Doubletree Hotel
along the eastern end of the Berkeley Marina for a WTA ferry terminal
site. Hornblower
[[Page 6660]]
operation, currently using the existing dock, also would be
accommodated in the design. Access to the site would be provided via
the western extension of University Avenue and Marina Boulevard.
Parking, passenger drop-off and bus boarding would be accommodated in
the existing parking areas surrounding the Doubletree Hotel.
3. Alternative B--Berkeley Fishing Pier Site. This alternative
would include a new ferry terminal located south of the existing
fishing pier near Hs Lordships restaurant. Access to the site would be
provided via the western extension of University Avenue. The existing
parking areas in the vicinity of Hs Lordships and Skates would be designed
to accommodate ferry parking, passenger drop-off, and bus boarding.
4. Alternative C--Gilman Street Site. This alternative would locate
a new ferry terminal in the general vicinity of the western end of
Gilman Street adjacent to the existing Golden Gate horse facilities,
which would need to be relocated to accommodate ferry parking,
passenger drop-off and bus boarding. Access to the site would be
provided via Gilman Street and would avoid conflicting with the City of
Berkeley's Gilman Street Recreation facilities, currently under
construction immediately west of I-80.
5. Alternative D--Buchanan Street site. This alternative would
locate a new ferry terminal south of the Albany Bulb and at the
northern end of Golden Gate Field near the old pier. Access to the site
would be provided via Buchanan Street. A portion of the existing Golden
Gate Field parking area would be used for ferry parking, passenger
drop-off and bus boarding.
The EIS Process and the Role of Participating Agencies and the
Public: The purpose of the EIS process is to explore in a public
setting potentially significant effects of implementing the proposed
action and alternatives on the physical, human, and natural
environment. Areas of investigation include, but are not limited to,
land use, environmental justice, historic resources, visual and
aesthetic qualities, air quality, noise and vibration, energy use,
traffic, safety and security, wetlands, threatened and endangered
species, and hazardous materials. Measures to avoid, minimize, or
mitigate any significant adverse impacts will be identified.
Regulations implementing NEPA, as well as provisions of the recently
enacted Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity
Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU), call for public involvement in
the EIS process. Section 6002 of SAFETEA-LU requires that FTA and PCJPB
do the following: (1) Extend an invitation to other Federal and non-
Federal agencies and Indian tribes that may have an interest in the
proposed project to become ``participating agencies'', (2) Provide an
opportunity for involvement by participating agencies and the public in
helping to define the purpose and need for a proposed project, as well
as the range of alternatives for consideration in the impact statement,
and (3) Establish a plan for coordinating public and agency
participation in and comment on the environmental review process. An
invitation to become a participating agency, with the scoping
information packet appended, will be extended to other Federal and non-
Federal agencies and Indian tribes that may have an interest in the
proposed project. It is possible that we may not be able to identify
all Federal and non-Federal agencies and Indian tribes that may have
such an interest. Any Federal or non-Federal agency or Indian tribe
interested in the proposed project that does not receive an invitation
to become a participating agency should notify, at the earliest
opportunity, the Environmental Manager identified above under
ADDRESSES. A comprehensive public involvement program has been
developed. The program includes a public scoping process, public
hearings on release of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS),
development of project newsletters and their distribution and posting on
the project Web site (http://www.watertransit.org). We invite
the public and participating agencies to consider the preliminary statement
of purposes of and need for the proposed project, as well as the
alternatives proposed for consideration, and the public is welcome to
use the public scoping process to further define the issues of concern
among all parties interested in the project. Comments on potential
significant environmental impacts that may be associated with the
proposed project are also welcomed. All comments and suggestions will
be given serious consideration. The purposes of and need for the
proposed project have been preliminarily identified in this notice. We
invite the public and participating agencies to consider the
preliminary statement of purposes of and need for the proposed project,
as well as the alternatives proposed for consideration. Suggestions for
modifications to the statement of purposes of and need for the proposed
project and any other alternatives that meet the purposes of and need
for the proposed project are welcomed and will be given serious
consideration. Comments on potentially significant environmental
impacts that may be associated with the proposed project and
alternatives are also welcomed. There will be additional opportunities
to participate in the scoping process at the public meetings announced
in this notice.
In accordance with 23 CFR 771.105(a) and 771.133, FTA will comply
with all Federal environmental laws, regulations and executive orders
applicable to the proposed project during the environmental review
process to the maximum extent practicable. These requirements include,
but are not limited to, the regulations of the Council on Environmental
Quality implementing NEPA (40 CFR parts 1500-1508 and 23 CFR part 771),
the project-level air quality conformity regulation of the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (40 CFR part 93), section
404(b)(1) guidelines of EPA (40 CFR part 230), Executive Orders 11988,
11990 and 12898 regarding floodplains, wetlands, and environmental
justice, respectively, Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act (36 CFR Part 800), Section 7 of the Endangered Species
Act (50 CFR part 402), and section 4(f) of the Department of
Transportation Act (23 CFR 771.135).
Issued On: February 5, 2007.
Leslie T. Rogers,
Regional Administrator, FTA, Region 9.
[FR Doc. E7-2246 Filed 2-9-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-57-P