Jump to main content.


Pacific Halibut Fisheries; Subsistence Fishing

PDF Version (4 pp, 59K, About PDF)

[Federal Register: August 4, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 150)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 45201-45204]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr04au08-21]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 300
[Docket No. 071203794-8828-01]
RIN 0648-AW36

Pacific Halibut Fisheries; Subsistence Fishing

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NMFS proposes regulations that amend the subsistence fishery
rules for members of an Alaska Native tribe eligible to harvest Pacific
halibut in waters in and off Alaska for customary and traditional use.
The proposed change would correct the location listed in the
regulations for the Village of Kanatak tribe and the International
Pacific Halibut Commission (IPHC) halibut regulatory area (Area) in
which members may subsistence fish. These regulations correctly define
the headquarters and Area for the Village of Kanatak tribe. The action
would change the tribe's headquarters from Egegik to Wasilla and the
corresponding Area from 4E to Area 3A. The intent of the correction is
to remove restrictions on participation of tribal members in
traditional subsistence fisheries for Pacific halibut by aligning the
tribe's headquarters with its actual location in Wasilla.

DATES: Comments must be received no later than September 3, 2008.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to Sue Salveson, Assistant Regional
Administrator, Sustainable Fisheries Division, Alaska Region, NMFS,
Attn: Ellen Sebastian. You may submit comments, identified by ``RIN
0648-AW36'' by any one of the following methods:
    • Electronic Submissions: Submit all electronic public comments via
the Federal eRulemaking Portal website at http://www.regulations.gov.
    • Mail: P. O. Box 21668, Juneau, AK 99802.
    • Fax: (907) 586-7557.
    • Hand delivery to the Federal Building: 709 West 9th
Street, Room 420A, Juneau, AK.
    All comments received are a part of the public record and will be
posted to http://www.regulations.gov without change. All Personal
Identifying Information (e.g., name, address, etc.) voluntarily
submitted by the commenter may be publicly accessible. Do not submit
confidential business information or otherwise sensitive or protected
information.
    NMFS will accept anonymous comments (enter ``N/A'' in the required
fields, if you wish to remain anonymous). Attachments to electronic
comments must be in Microsoft Word, Excel, WordPerfect, or Adobe
portable document file (pdf) formats to be accepted.
    Copies of the Categorical Exclusion (CE) and Regulatory Impact
Review (RIR) prepared for this action may be obtained from the NMFS
Alaska Region, P.O. Box 21668, Juneau, Alaska 99802, Attn: Ellen
Sebastian, Records Officer; in person at NMFS Alaska Region, 709 West
9\th\ Street, Room 420A, Juneau, Alaska; and via the Internet at the
NMFS Alaska Region website at www.noaa.fakr.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Murphy, 907-586-7228.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background and Need for Action

    The United States and Canada participate in the International
Pacific Halibut Commission (IPHC) and promulgate regulations governing
the Pacific halibut (Hippoglossus stenolepis) fishery under the
authority of the Northern Pacific Halibut Act of 1982 (Halibut Act).
Regulations governing the allocation and catch of halibut in U.S.
convention waters that are in agreement with the Halibut Act may be
developed by the North Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council).
Regulations recommended by the Council must be approved by the
Secretary of Commerce before being implemented through the National
Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). The Council prepared an environmental
assessment/regulatory impact review (EA/RIR) for subsistence halibut
fisheries, in January 2003, and NMFS published the final rule to
implement subsistence halibut regulations in April 2003 (68 FR 18145).
The Alaska Native tribe, Village of Kanatak is recognized in the
regulations as an organized tribal entity with its tribal headquarters
located in Egegik, Alaska within halibut regulatory area 3A. However,
the tribe's headquarters are actually located in Wasilla, Alaska in
halibut regulatory area 4E. The initial assignment of the tribal
headquarters location to Egegik was incorrect.
    The lists of rural communities and native tribes recommended by the
Council and approved by the Secretary for subsistence fishing
eligibility were derived from positive customary and traditional
findings for halibut and bottomfish made by the Alaska State Board of
Fisheries (BOF) prior to the Alaska Supreme Court decision, McDowell v.
State, 785 P.2d 1 (Alaska 1989). The Council retains exclusive
authority to recommend changes to the list of communities Sec. 
300.65(g)(1) and Alaska Native tribes Sec.  300.65(g)(2) with customary
and traditional uses of Pacific halibut. Residents and tribal members
who believe that their rural or tribal place was incorrectly left out
of the subsistence eligibility listing for

[[Page 45202]]

communities or Alaska Native tribes, or who are seeking eligibility for
the first time, are encouraged to seek a customary and traditional
finding from the BOF before petitioning the Council.

The Proposed Action

    In June 2007, the Council received a request from the Kanatak
Tribal Council to have its fishing area corrected from Area 4E to Area
3A, because the current, erroneous, listing has prevented the same
tribal members from participating in traditional subsistence fisheries.
The Council recognized this difference and responded by recommending an
amendment to Sec.  300.65(g)(2) to change the listing for the Village
of Kanatak's headquarters from Egegik to Wasilla and update the
corresponding halibut regulatory area from Area 4E to Area 3A. The
intent of the correction is to remove restrictions on individual
participation by aligning the tribe's headquarters with its actual
location in Wasilla.
    Individual persons are eligible to harvest subsistence halibut if
they are rural residents of a community or a member of an Alaska Native
tribe with customary and traditional uses of halibut. Communities and
tribes are listed in tables by Halibut Regulatory Areas at Sec. 
300.65(g)(1) and (2), respectively. A person subsistence fishing for
halibut also must hold a valid Subsistence Halibut Area Registration
Certificate (SHARC) in that person's name issued by NMFS. An individual
holding a SHARC that resides in a rural area may harvest subsistence
halibut in all waters in and off Alaska except for areas designated as
non-subsistence areas. The four non-subsistence areas specified in
regulation at Sec.  300.65(h)(3) are the Ketchikan, Juneau, Anchorage/-
Matsu/-Kenai, and Valdez non-subsistence areas (see Figures 2 through 5
to subpart E of part 300). Under this action, there would be no change
to rural eligibility criteria to subsistence fish for halibut in any
halibut regulatory area in waters in and off the State of Alaska.
    A non-rural Alaska resident or a resident of another state who is a
member of a tribe that is located in a rural area is limited to
subsistence fishing for halibut only in his or her area of tribal
membership (Sec.  300.65(h)(4)(i) and (ii)). The ``area of tribal
membership'' is defined at Sec.  300.65(h)(4)(iii) as ``rural areas of
the [IPHC] regulatory area or of the Bering Sea closed area in which
the Alaska Native tribal headquarters is located.'' The area of tribal
membership for the Kanatak tribe is currently Area 4E. The action would
align the Village of Kanatak's tribal headquarters with its actual
location in Wasilla in Area 3A and effectively changes area
restrictions on some members of the tribe to conduct subsistence
halibut fishing. The proposed action is expected to redistribute some
tribal members' harvesting effort from Area 4E to fishing areas in Area
3A. Waters in Area 3A include two non-subsistence areas that are closed
to subsistence fishing: the Anchorage-Matsu-Kenai non-rural area and
the Valdez non-rural area.
    Moving the place of the Kanatak tribal headquarters to Wasilla is
expected to increase customary and traditional uses of halibut by
individual members of the tribe in Area 3A. Wasilla is a community in
the Anchorage-Matsu-Kenai non-rural area within Area 3A where a
majority of Kanatak tribal members reside. Non-rural and non-resident
members of the Kanatak tribe may increase subsistence halibut use in
Area 3A because they would have greater access to subsistence fishing
areas through Anchorage, central Alaska's main transportation hub that
is connected to road systems throughout much of Area 3A.
    The action would improve accuracy of current regulations, and the
quality of subsistence halibut information for non-rural tribal
members, by correctly recognizing the location of the tribe's
headquarters in Wasilla. This correction improves area specific data
collected by the State of Alaska subsistence halibut survey and
analyzed for reporting subsistence harvest and effort in Alaska.

Classification

    Regulations governing the U.S. fisheries for Pacific halibut are
developed by the International Pacific Halibut Commission (IPHC), the
Pacific Fishery Management Council, the North Pacific Fishery
Management Council (Council), and the Secretary of Commerce. Section 5
of the Northern Pacific Halibut Act of 1982 (Halibut Act, 16 U.S.C.
773c) allows the Regional Council having authority for a particular
geographical area to develop regulations governing the allocation and
catch of halibut in U.S. Convention waters as long as those regulations
do not conflict with IPHC regulations. The proposed action is
consistent with the Council's authority to allocate halibut catches
among fishery participants in the waters in and off Alaska.
    Executive Order 13175 of November 6, 2000 (25 U.S.C. 450 note), the
Executive Memorandum of April 29, 1994 (25 U.S.C. 450 note), and the
American Indian and Alaska Native Policy of the U.S. Department of
Commerce (March 30, 1995) outline the responsibilities of NMFS in
matters affecting tribal interests. Section 161 of Public Law (P.L.)
108-199 (188 Stat. 452), as amended by section 518 of P.L. 109-447 (118
Stat. 3267), extends the consultation requirements of E.O. 13175 to
Alaska Native corporations. NMFS has special obligations to consult and
coordinate with tribal governments and Alaska Native Claims Settlement
Act (ANCSA) corporations on a government-to-government basis. This rule
affects individual members of the Village of Kanatak tribe, but not the
tribe itself, and the village of Kanatak is not recognized as an ANCSA
corporation. NMFS recognizes the importance of communication and during
the process of developing the proposed action, NMFS consulted with the
Alaska Native Subsistence Halibut Working Group in December 2007 and
the Kanatak Tribal Administrator in January 2008.
    The proposed rule was determined to be not significant for the
purposes of Executive Order (E.O.) 12866.
    The Chief Counsel for Regulation of the Department of Commerce
certified to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration (SBA) that this action, if adopted, would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.

Basis and purpose of rule

    The United States and Canada participate in the International
Pacific Halibut Commission (IPHC) and promulgate regulations
governing the Pacific halibut (Hippoglossus stenolepis) fishery
under the authority of the Northern Pacific Halibut Act of 1982
(Halibut Act). Regulations governing the allocation and catch of
halibut in U.S. convention waters that are in agreement with the
Halibut Act may be developed by the North Pacific Fishery Management
Council (Council). The Secretary of Commerce must approve
regulations recommended by the Council before implementation by the
National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). The Council prepared an
environmental assessment/regulatory impact review (EA/RIR) for
subsistence halibut fisheries, in January 2003, and NMFS published
the final rule to implement subsistence halibut regulations in April
2003 (68 FR 18145). The Alaska Native tribe, Village of Kanatak is
recognized in the regulations as an organized tribal entity with its
tribal headquarters located in Egegik, Alaska within halibut
regulatory area 3A. However, the tribe's headquarters are actually
located in Wasilla, Alaska in halibut regulatory area 4E. The initial
assignment of the tribal headquarters location to Egegik was incorrect.
    In June 2007, the Council received a request from the Kanatak
Tribal Council to have its fishing area corrected from Area 4E to
Area 3A, because the current, erroneous, listing has prevented the
same tribal members from participating in traditional subsistence
fisheries. The Council recognized this difference and responded by

[[Page 45203]]

recommending an amendment to Sec.  300.65(g)(2) to change the
listing for the Village of Kanatak's headquarters from Egegik to
Wasilla and update the corresponding halibut regulatory area from
Area 4E to Area 3A. The intent of the correction is to remove
restrictions on individual participation by aligning the tribe's
headquarters with its actual location in Wasilla.
    Individual persons are eligible to harvest subsistence halibut
if they are rural residents of a community or a member of an Alaska
Native tribe with customary and traditional uses of halibut.
Communities and tribes are listed in tables by Halibut Regulatory
Areas at Sec.  300.65(g)(1) and (2), respectively. A person
subsistence fishing for halibut also must hold a valid Subsistence
Halibut Area Registration Certificate (SHARC) in that person's name
issued by NMFS. An individual holding a SHARC that resides in a
rural area may harvest subsistence halibut in all waters in and off
Alaska except for areas designated as non-subsistence areas. The
four non-subsistence areas specified in regulation at Sec. 
300.65(h)(3) are the Ketchikan, Juneau, Anchorage/-Matsu/-Kenai, and
Valdez non-subsistence areas (see Figures 2 through 5 to subpart E
of part 300). Under this action, there would be no change to rural
eligibility criteria to subsistence fish for halibut in any halibut
regulatory area in waters in and off the State of Alaska.
    A non-rural Alaska resident or a resident of another state who
is a member of a tribe that is located in a rural area is limited to
subsistence fishing for halibut only in his or her area of tribal
membership (Sec.  300.65(h)(4)(i) and (ii)). The ``area of tribal
membership'' is defined at Sec.  300.65(h)(4)(iii) as ``rural areas
of the [IPHC] regulatory area or of the Bering Sea closed area in
which the Alaska Native tribal headquarters is located.'' The area
of tribal membership for the Kanatak tribe is currently Area 4E. The
action would align the Village of Kanatak's tribal headquarters with
its actual location in Wasilla in Area 3A and effectively changes
area restrictions on some members of the tribe to conduct
subsistence halibut fishing. The proposed action is expected to
redistribute some tribal members' harvesting effort from Area 4E to
fishing areas in Area 3A. Waters in Area 3A include two non-
subsistence areas that are closed to subsistence fishing: the
Anchorage-Matsu-Kenai non-rural area and the Valdez non-rural area.
    Moving the place of the Kanatak tribal headquarters to Wasilla
is expected to increase customary and traditional uses of halibut by
individual members of the tribe in Area 3A. Wasilla is a community
in the Anchorage-Matsu-Kenai non-rural area within Area 3A where a
majority of Kanatak tribal members reside. Non-rural and non-
resident members of the Kanatak tribe may increase subsistence
halibut use in Area 3A because they would have greater access to
subsistence fishing areas through Anchorage, central Alaska's main
transportation hub that is connected to road systems throughout much
of Area 3A.

Factual Basis for the Certification

Description and estimate of the number of small entities to which
the rule applies

    The action would not directly regulate any small entities. Small
entities have the same definition as small business, small
organizations, and small government jurisdictions in Section 601(3)-
(5) of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) of 1980. Instead, the
action would directly regulate individual persons who are not
considered small entities within the meaning of the RFA.
    An individual member of the Village of Kanatak tribe would be
directly regulated by the action if he or she is: (a) a non-rural
resident of Alaska or a resident of a state other than Alaska; and
(b) subsistence fishing for halibut (Sec.  300.65(h)(4)(i)-(iii)).
Even though there are typically a number of individuals in a tribe
they are regulated as individual persons and not collectively as
evidenced by the distinction of residency. The Village of Kanatak
would be the only Alaska Native tribe whose non-rural and non-
resident members would be directly regulated by the proposed rule.
    All of the persons that would be directly regulated by the
action are natural persons. The subsistence halibut regulation at
Sec.  300.65(g)(2) specifies that ``A person is eligible to harvest
subsistence halibut if he or she is a member of an Alaska Native
tribe with customary and traditional uses of halibut listed [in the
table in this paragraph].'' The Village of Kanatak is listed in the
table and individual members of the tribe are recognized as natural
persons eligible to harvest subsistence halibut. Moreover, all of
the members of the Kanatak Tribe are natural persons as direct
descendents of individuals counted in a census carried out in
Kanatak in 1924 (Olivier, pers. comm.). The regulations further
specify at Sec.  300.61 that halibut caught for subsistence purposes
are defined as halibut caught by a rural resident or a member of an
Alaska Native tribe for direct personal or family consumption as
food, sharing for personal or family consumption as food, or
customary trade. While there is no clear requirement in the
regulations that a ``rural resident'' or a ``member of an Alaska
Native tribe'' be a natural person, the regulations clearly
anticipate that they will be.
    The definition of small entity, distinction of individual tribal
members, and declaration of natural persons combined provide the
factual basis for asserting no small entities are directly regulated
by the action.

Description and estimate of economic impact on small entities by
entity size and industry

    No small entities are directly regulated by the proposed rule.
Therefore, there are no economic impacts on directly regulated small
entities.

Criteria used to evaluate whether the rule would impose impacts on
``a substantial number of small entities''

    The criteria used to determine whether or not small entities are
directly regulated by this action are the definitions of a small
business, small organization, small governmental jurisdiction, and
small entity in 601(3), (4), (5), and (6) of the RFA, and the
definition of a business concern at 13 CFR 121.105.

Criteria used to evaluate whether the rule would impose
``significant economic impacts''

    Because this action will not directly regulate any small
entities, no criteria were necessary to make a determination of
whether or not the action would have significant economic impacts on
directly regulated entities.

Description of and basis for assumptions used

    The finding that no small entities would be directly regulated
by this action is based on the definition of small entities in the
RFA and implementing regulations, a determination that only
individual members of the Kanatak Tribe would be directly regulated,
and a determination that all individual tribal members are natural
persons, and not entities, as contemplated by the statute and
regulations. As a result, an initial regulatory flexibility analysis
is not required and none has been prepared.

    Because there will not be a substantial impact on a significant
number of small entities, an initial regulatory flexibility analysis is
not required and none has been prepared.

List of Subjects for 50 CFR Part 300

    Alaska, Alaska Natives, Fisheries, Fishing, Pacific halibut
fisheries, Tribes.

    Dated: July 29, 2008.
Samuel D. Rauch III
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
    For the reasons set out in the preamble, NMFS proposes to amend 50
CFR part 300 as follows:

PART 300--INTERNATIONAL FISHERIES REGULATIONS

    1. The authority citation for 50 CFR part 300, subpart E, continues
to read as follows:

    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 773-773k.
    2. In Sec.  300.65, in paragraph (g)(2):
    A. In the table for Halibut Regulatory Area 3A, add in alphabetical
order an entry for ``Wasilla''.
    B. In the table for Halibut Regulatory Area 4E, revise the entry
for ``Egegik''.
    The addition and revision read as follows.

Sec.  300.65  Catch sharing plan and domestic management measures in
waters in and off Alaska.

* * * * *
    (g) * * *
    (2) * * *

[[Page 45204]]

Halibut Regulatory Area 3A

------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Place with Tribal Headquarters          Organized Tribal Entity
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *                        ...................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wasilla                              Village of Kanatak
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *                        ...................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *

Halibut Regulatory Area 4E

------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Place with Tribal Headquarters          Organized Tribal Entity
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *                        ...................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Egegik                               Egegik Village
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *                        ...................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *
[FR Doc. E8-17814 Filed 8-1-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S

 
 


Local Navigation


Jump to main content.