Jump to main content.


Notice of Availability of Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact for License Amendment to Materials License No. 06-00217-06, for Remediation of Portions of a Site in Windsor, CT

Note: EPA no longer updates this information, but it may be useful as a reference or resource.


PDF Version (3 pp, 52K, About PDF)

[Federal Register: July 2, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 126)]
[Notices]
[Page 31770-31772]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr02jy09-94]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[NRC-2009-0272; Docket No. 03003754]

Notice of Availability of Environmental Assessment and Finding of
No Significant Impact for License Amendment to Materials License No.
06-00217-06, for Remediation of Portions of a Site in Windsor, CT

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Issuance of Environmental Assessment and Finding of No
Significant Impact for License Amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James Schmidt, (610) 337-5276; or John
Nicholson, (610) 337-5236; Health Physicist, Decommissioning Branch,
Division of Nuclear Materials Safety, Region I, 475 Allendale Road,
King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406; fax number (610) 337-5269; or by
e-mail: jim.schmidt@nrc.gov; john.nicholson@nrc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Introduction

    The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is considering the
issuance of a license amendment to Materials License No. 06-00217-06
issued to ABB Inc. (ABB or the Licensee). ABB submitted the amendment
request by letter dated December 31, 2008. The proposed action would
authorize ABB to conduct remediation in place of the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE), at portions of the ABB site designated as Formally
Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) areas. The ABB site, a
612-acre parcel located at 2000 Day Hill Road, in Windsor, Connecticut
(the Facility), is currently undergoing site-wide decommissioning. The
Facility's FUSRAP areas will be cleaned up by the Licensee with NRC
oversight, in accordance with an agreement between the NRC and USACE
dated August 15, 2007. Under this agreement, USACE will suspend its
FUSRAP activities at the Facility after the Licensee modifies its
previously-approved site decommissioning plan (DP) by bringing within
its scope cleanup of the FUSRAP areas. To accomplish this, the Licensee
submitted a revised DP for NRC review and approval as part of its
December 31, 2008, application.
    The NRC has prepared an Environmental Assessment (EA) in support of
this proposed action in accordance with the requirements of Title 10,
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 51 (10 CFR Part 51). Based on
the EA, the NRC has concluded that a Finding of No Significant Impact
(FONSI) is appropriate with respect to the proposed action. The
amendment will be issued to the Licensee following the publication of
this FONSI and EA in the Federal Register.

II. Environmental Assessment

Identification of Proposed Action

    The proposed action would approve the Licensee's December 31, 2008,
license amendment request. The scope of the DP (initially approved on
June 1, 2004) will be expanded to authorize ABB to conduct remediation
activities for select FUSRAP areas at its Facility.
    Changes in the revised DP were generally limited to an update to
reflect the successful remediation of the non-FUSRAP Facility areas,
and a description of the remaining Facility areas to be remediated.
However, the revised DP does include new derived concentration
guideline levels (DCGLs) for uranium and cobalt-60, to be used for one
structure: The south portion of Building 3, that will remain in place
following completion of the remediation activities. Areas to be
remediated under the revised DP include all FUSRAP areas except the
Debris Pile area and Site Brook area. These areas are located in
wetlands and will be the subject of a future DP amendment. The specific
FUSRAP areas to be remediated included the removal of part of the five
acre Building 3 Complex; removal of the one acre Building 6 Complex;
removal of the industrial, waste, and sanitary lines associated with
the Building Complexes; excavation of the seven acre Woods Area; and
excavation of the one acre Drum Burial Pit area. Additionally, the
revised DP provided for the Licensee's remediation of a two acre area
termed the Burning Grounds which is contaminated with small quantities
of radium-226 and thorium-232. This area was previously remediated to
existing NRC standards and approved for unrestricted use by the NRC on
August 10, 1989.

Need for the Proposed Action

    The proposed action would allow ABB to complete the remaining
Facility remediation and decommissioning activities, thereby reducing
residual radioactivity at the Facility to a level that permits release
of the entire property for unrestricted use and termination of the
license. The Licensee has been successfully remediating and
decommissioning the Facility since 2004 under the previously-approved
DP. In order to complete remediation of the entire Facility, the FUSRAP
areas must be remediated. NRC is fulfilling its responsibilities under
the Atomic Energy Act to make a decision on a proposed license
amendment for decommissioning that ensures safety and protection of the
public and the environment.

Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action

    In preparing this EA, the NRC staff reviewed the 2004 EA issued in
connection with the initial DP; the Licensee's Environmental Report
submitted on February 28, 2008; and the revised DP submitted on
December 31, 2008. Additionally, the staff reviewed the performance of
the decommissioning activities completed by the Licensee to date. The
staff concluded that the bases for the findings of the 2004 EA remain
valid, and are applicable to the revised DP. Regarding remediation of
the FUSRAP areas, decommissioning methodologies are unchanged from the
initial approved DP and are appropriate for the contaminant
concentrations found in the FUSRAP area structures and soils. The same
isotopes that were present in the Facility's non-FUSRAP areas (namely,
those associated with enriched uranium and cobalt-60) exist in the
FUSRAP areas as well. The FUSRAP buildings and areas requiring
remediation are similar to those already successfully remediated and
decommissioned at the Facility. The amount of waste in FUSRAP areas
which will need to be packaged and shipped to a licensed disposal
facility is similar to the amounts evaluated in the 2004 EA, and this
waste will be packaged and transported to the same disposal facility
previously used for non-FUSRAP area remediation activities.
    As stated above, the revised DP includes a new site specific
building DCGL, to support the unrestricted release of the southern
portion, or High Bay, of Building 3. The staff's technical review
confirmed that the licensee's requested site specific total uranium and
cobalt-60 building DCGLs of 20,148,

[[Page 31771]]

and 6,980 disintegrations per 100 square centimeters, respectively,
would result in a maximum annual dose of less than 19 millirem of total
effective dose equivalent to an average member of a critical group
occupying the remaining structure. Since this dose is less than 25
millrem per year, use of these DCGLs will meet the radiological
criteria for unrestricted release specified in 10 CFR 20.1402. The
conclusions of the 2004 EA thus remain valid here for the proposed action.
    The revised decommissioning plan included additional remediation
for the Burning Grounds which was previously cleaned up to NRC
standards and approved for unrestricted use in 1989. The licensee is
performing this additional remediation because the existing
contaminates remaining in this area are slightly above decommissioning
screening values presently being used by the NRC staff. The staff
reviewed the licensee's proposal to use post-remediation soil DCGLs of
1.1 and 0.6 picocuries per gram of soil for the isotopes of thorium-232
and radium-226, respectively, which are the screening values listed in
Table B.2 of NUREG 1757, ``Consolidated NMSS Decommissioning
Guidance,'' Volume 1, Revision 2. These values correspond to surface
soil concentrations that the NRC staff has deemed are in compliance
with the unrestricted release requirements of 10 CFR 20.1402, and are
thus consistent with the 2004 EA findings.
    In summary, NRC staff has reviewed the revised decommissioning plan
for the Facility, and examined the impact of the proposed additional
decommissioning activities. Based upon its review, the staff has
determined that environmental impacts associated with the proposed
action are no greater than the impacts found in the 2004 EA, and are
bounded by the impacts discussed in NUREG 1496, ``Generic Environmental
Impact Statement in Support of Rulemaking on Radiological Criteria for
License Termination of NRC-Licensed Nuclear Facilities,'' Volumes 1-3.
The staff finds there have been no significant environmental impacts to
date from the use and cleanup of radioactive material at the Facility.
The NRC staff reviewed the docket file records to identify any non-
radiological hazards that may impact the environment surrounding the
Facility. No such hazards or impacts to the environment were
identified. The NRC has identified no other radiological or non-
radiological activities in the area that could result in cumulative
environmental impacts.
    The staff has considered the impact of the proposed FUSRAP area
remediation at the Facility, and finds that the proposed action will
not have a significant impact on the quality of the human environment.

Environmental Impacts of the Alternatives to the Proposed Action

    The Facility is in the process of being decommissioned under an
approved DP, and the NRC has agreed to allow ABB to conduct the
remediation of the FUSRAP areas as part of a formal agreement with the
USACE. Therefore, the only alternative to the proposed action to
continue the decommissioning process at the Facility is no action. The
no-action alternative is not acceptable because it is inconsistent with
NRC's Timeliness Rule (10 CFR 30.36), which requires licensees to
decommission their facilities when licensed activities cease and to
request termination of their radioactive materials license. Although
termination of the NRC and USACE agreement would result in unnecessary
remediation and decommissioning delay, the environmental impacts
created by the action would be unchanged. Additionally, denying the
amendment request would result in no change in current environmental
impacts. The environmental impacts of the proposed action and the no-
action alternative are therefore similar, and the no-action alternative
is accordingly not further considered.

Conclusion

    The NRC staff reviewed the environmental impacts of the proposed
action in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 51 and NRC's
unrestricted release criteria specified in 10 CFR 20.1402. The NRC
staff has determined that incorporating the Facility's FUSRAP areas
into the site-wide DP would not significantly affect the quality of the
human environment. Therefore, an environmental impact statement is not
warranted for the proposed action, and pursuant to 10 CFR 51.32, a
FONSI is appropriate.

Agencies and Persons Consulted

    This EA was prepared by NRC staff and coordinated with the
following agencies: Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection
and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services. NRC provided a draft of this
EA to the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection for review
on May 20, 2009. On June 19, 2009, Michael Firsick of the Connecticut
Department of Environmental Protection responded by e-mail. The State
agreed with the conclusions of the EA, however, they included a letter
dated June 19, 2009, indicating that ABB had not submitted the
requested surveys to indicate the presence of two State species of
special concern occurring in the project vicinity: Eastern box turtle
(Terrapene carolina) and Eastern hognose snake (Heterodon platirhinos).
On June 24, 2009, Mr. Firsick reported by e-mail that the issues identified
in the June 19, 2009, letter had been appropriately resolved with ABB.

III. Finding of No Significant Impact

    On the basis of this EA, the NRC finds that there are no
significant environmental impacts from the proposed action and that
preparation of an environmental impact statement is not warranted.
Accordingly, the NRC has determined that a FONSI is appropriate.

IV. Further Information

    Documents related to this action, including the application for
license amendment and supporting documentation, are available
electronically at the NRC's Electronic Reading Room at http://
www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. From this site, you can access the
NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS), which
provides text and image files of NRC's public documents. The documents
related to this action are listed below, along with their ADAMS
accession numbers.
    1. NUREG-1757, ``Consolidated NMSS Decommissioning Guidance;''
    2. Title 10 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 20, Subpart E,
``Radiological Criteria for License Termination;''
    3. Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 51, ``Environmental
Protection Regulations for Domestic Licensing and Related Regulatory
Functions;''
    4. NUREG-1496, ``Generic Environmental Impact Statement in Support
of Rulemaking on Radiological Criteria for License Termination of NRC-
Licensed Nuclear Facilities'' (ML042310492, ML042320379, and ML042330385);
    5. NRC letter and safety evaluation report to Combustion
Engineering, Inc. authorizing unrestricted release of the woods area
(Burning Grounds) dated August 10, 1989 (ML091400662);
    6. ABB letter to NRC dated October 15, 2003, ``Application for
Amendment of Materials License 06-00217-06'' dated October 15, 2003
(ML033080245, ML033080248, and ML033080252);
    7. Enclosure II to ABB letter dated October 15, 2003 ``CE Windsor
Site Decommissioning Plan, October 15,

[[Page 31772]]

2003'' (ML033080254, ML033080258, ML033080273, ML033080279,
ML033080310, and ML033080313);
    8. Enclosure III to ABB letter dated October 15, 2003 ``CE Windsor
Site Derivation of Site-Specific DCGLs, September 2003'' (ML033080318,
ML033080320, ML033080327, ML033080334, ML033080341, ML033080346,
ML033080352, ML033080356, and ML033080366);
    9. ``Environmental Assessment of the Proposed Decommissioning Plan
for the ABB Prospects, Inc. Windsor, Connecticut Facility'' dated May
20, 2004 (ML041400413);
    10. NRC letter to the USACE dated August 15, 2007, ``Proposed
Process To Decommission and Cleanup the ABB Windsor Site'' (ML072210979);
    11. ABB letter to NRC dated February 28, 2008, ``Subject:
Environmental Information Report'' (ML080850764, ML080850789);
    12. ABB letter to the NRC dated December 31, 2008, ``Application
for Amendment of Materials License 06-00217-06'' (ML090160123,
ML090160128, ML090160370, and ML090160378);
    13. Attachment 4 to ABB letter dated December 31, 2008, ``CE
Windsor Site Decommissioning Plan, Revision 1, December 2008''
(ML090160381, ML090160388, and ML090160396);
    14. Attachment 5 to ABB letter dated December 31, 2008. ``CE
Windsor Site Development of Building DCGLs, Revision 0, December 2008''
(ML090160458, ML090160469, ML090160478, and ML090160487); and
    15. State of Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection e-
mail regarding actions to be taken for two State species of special
concern occurring in the CE Windsor Site vicinity dated June 19, 2009
(ML091730286).
    If you do not have access to ADAMS, or if there are problems in
accessing the documents located in ADAMS, contact the NRC Public
Document Room (PDR) Reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or
by e-mail to pdr@nrc.gov. These documents may also be viewed
electronically on the public computers located at the NRC's PDR, O 1
F21, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852.
The PDR reproduction contractor will copy documents for a fee.

    Dated at Region I, 475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, PA, this
25th day of June 2009.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Judith Joustra,
Chief, Decommissioning Branch, Division of Nuclear Materials Safety, Region I.
[FR Doc. E9-15619 Filed 7-1-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P

 
 


Local Navigation


Jump to main content.