Propyzamide; Extension of Tolerance for Emergency Exemptions

Note: EPA no longer updates this information, but it may be useful as a reference or resource.
 [Federal Register: February 10, 1999 (Volume 64, Number 27)]
[Rules and Regulations]               
[Page 6529-6532]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr10fe99-15]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 180

[OPP-300791; FRL-6060-3]
RIN 2070-AB78

 
Propyzamide; Extension of Tolerance for Emergency Exemptions

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This regulation extends time-limited tolerances for combined 
residues of the herbicide propyzamide (pronamide) and its metabolites 
in or on cranberries at 0.05 part per million (ppm) grass forage at 1.0 
ppm, and grass hay at 0.5 ppm for an additional 2-year period. These 
tolerances will expire and are revoked on December 31, 2001. This 
action is in response to EPA's granting of an emergency exemption under 
section 18 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act 
(FIFRA) authorizing use of the pesticide on cranberries and grass grown 
for seed. Section 408(l)(6) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act 
requires EPA to establish a time-limited tolerance or exemption from 
the requirement for a tolerance for pesticide chemical residues in food 
that will result from the use of a pesticide under an emergency 
exemption granted by EPA under FIFRA section 18.

DATES: This regulation becomes effective February 10, 1999. Objections

[[Page 6530]]

and requests for hearings must be received by EPA, on or before April 
12, 1999.

ADDRESSES: Written objections and hearing requests, identified by the 
docket control number [OPP-300791], must be submitted to: Hearing Clerk 
(1900), Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. M3708, 401 M St., SW., 
Washington, DC 20460. Fees accompanying objections and hearing requests 
shall be labeled ``Tolerance Petition Fees'' and forwarded to: EPA 
Headquarters Accounting Operations Branch, OPP (Tolerance Fees), P.O. 
Box 360277M, Pittsburgh, PA 15251. A copy of any objections and hearing 
requests filed with the Hearing Clerk identified by the docket control 
number, [OPP-300791], must also be submitted to: Public Information and 
Records Integrity Branch, Information Resources and Services Division 
(7502C), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 
401 M St., SW., Washington, DC 20460. In person, bring a copy of 
objections and hearing requests to Rm. 119, Crystal Mall #2, 1921 
Jefferson Davis Hwy., Arlington, VA.
     A copy of objections and hearing requests filed with the Hearing 
Clerk may also be submitted electronically by sending electronic mail 
(e-mail) to: opp-docket@epa.gov. Copies of electronic objections and 
hearing requests must be submitted as an ASCII file avoiding the use of 
special characters and any form of encryption. Copies of objections and 
hearing requests will also be accepted on disks in WordPerfect 5.1/6.1 
or ASCII file format. All copies of electronic objections and hearing 
requests must be identified by the docket control number [OPP-300791]. 
No Confidential Business Information (CBI) should be submitted through 
e-mail. Copies of electronic objections and hearing requests on this 
rule may be filed online at many Federal Depository Libraries.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: By mail: Andrew Ertman, Registration 
Division (7505C), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental 
Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW., Washington, DC 20460. Office 
location , telephone number, and e-mail address: Rm. 280, Crystal Mall 
#2, 1921 Jefferson Davis Hwy., Arlington, VA, (703) 308-9367, 
ertman.andrew@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA issued a final rule, published in the 
Federal Register of September 16, 1998 (63 FR 49479) (FRL-6022-5), 
which announced that on its own initiative under section 408 of the 
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 21 U.S.C. 346a(e) and 
(l)(6), as amended by the Food Quality Protection Act of 1996 (FQPA) 
(Pub. L. 104-170) it established time-limited tolerances for the 
combined residues of propyzamide and its metabolites in or on 
cranberries at 0.05 ppm, grass forage at 1.0 ppm, and grass hay at 0.5 
ppm, with an expiration date of December 31, 1999. EPA established the 
tolerances because section 408(l)(6) of the FFDCA requires EPA to 
establish a time-limited tolerance or exemption from the requirement 
for a tolerance for pesticide chemical residues in food that will 
result from the use of a pesticide under an emergency exemption granted 
by EPA under FIFRA section 18. Such tolerances can be established 
without providing notice or period for public comment.
    EPA received a request to extend the use of propyzamide on 
cranberries for this year's growing season to control dodder because 
dodder is a serious and devastating pest in commercial cranberry 
production. It is an obligate shoot parasite that, in order to survive, 
must make a successful attachment to a host plant. The body of the 
organism consists of thin, yellow, twining stems that produce small 
clusters of white flowers and can form a dense mat of ``spaghetti-
like'' stems on top of infected plants. Dodder is prolific in its seed 
production, and produces seeds in capsules that are contained in large 
air spaces and are thus very buoyant. With the widespread adoption of 
water harvesting, dodder infestations have become practically 
ubiquitous in the Massachusetts production area. The detrimental impact 
of dodder infestations on cranberry yields have been reported widely in 
scientific journals, extension publications and internal memorandum. 
Yield losses can range from 12% in slight infestations up to 100% in 
severe infestations. Currently registered herbicides have not been 
totally effective, leading to a steady increase in dodder infestations. 
After having reviewed the submission, EPA concurs that emergency 
conditions exist. EPA has authorized under FIFRA section 18 the use of 
propyzamide on cranberries for control of dodder in Massachusetts.
    EPA received a request to extend the use of propyzamide on grass 
grown for seed for this year's growing season. Because of cancellation 
of several herbicide uses in recent years, a shift in weed populations 
and the development of resistance, plus restrictions imposed on open 
field burning, grass growers are no longer able to control weeds 
adequately with registered materials and cultural methods. The 
Applicants claim that if weeds are not adequately controlled, growers 
will incur significant economic losses due to reduced yields, and from 
losses due to contaminated seed, and replanting of fields that do not 
meet certification requirements. The Applicant proposed use of 
propyzamide, in conjunction with several other herbicides, to comprise 
a comprehensive management system to solve the current weed control 
problems in grass seed production. After having reviewed the 
submission, EPA concurs that emergency conditions exist. EPA has 
authorized under FIFRA section 18 the use of propyzamide on grass grown 
for seed for control of grassy weeds in Oregon.
    EPA assessed the potential risks presented by residues of 
propyzamide in or on cranberries and grass grown for seed. In doing so, 
EPA considered the safety standard in FFDCA section 408(b)(2), and 
decided that the necessary tolerances under FFDCA section 408(l)(6) 
would be consistent with the safety standard and with FIFRA section 18. 
The data and other relevant material have been evaluated and discussed 
in the final rule of September 16, 1998 (63 FR 49479)(FRL-6022-5). 
Based on that data and information considered, the Agency reaffirms 
that extension of the time-limited tolerances will continue to meet the 
requirements of section 408(l)(6). Therefore, the time-limited 
tolerances are extended for an additional 2-year period. EPA will 
publish a document in the Federal Register to remove the revoked 
tolerances from the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). Although these 
tolerances will expire and are revoked on December 31, 2001, under 
FFDCA section 408(l)(5), residues of the pesticide not in excess of the 
amounts specified in the tolerances remaining in or on cranberries 
after that date will not be unlawful, provided the pesticide is applied 
in a manner that was lawful under FIFRA and the application occurred 
prior to the revocation of the tolerances. EPA will take action to 
revoke these tolerances earlier if any experience with, scientific data 
on, or other relevant information on this pesticide indicate that the 
residues are not safe.

I. Objections and Hearing Requests

     The new FFDCA section 408(g) provides essentially the same process 
for persons to ``object'' to a tolerance regulation issued by EPA under 
new section 408(e) and (l)(6) as was provided in the old section 408 
and in section 409. However, the period for filing objections is 60 
days, rather than 30 days. EPA currently has procedural

[[Page 6531]]

regulations which govern the submission of objections and hearing 
requests. These regulations will require some modification to reflect 
the new law. However, until those modifications can be made, EPA will 
continue to use those procedural regulations with appropriate 
adjustments to reflect the new law.
    Any person may, by April 12, 1999, file written objections to any 
aspect of this regulation and may also request a hearing on those 
objections. Objections and hearing requests must be filed with the 
Hearing Clerk, at the address given under the ``ADDRESSES'' section (40 
CFR 178.20). A copy of the objections and/or hearing requests filed 
with the Hearing Clerk should be submitted to the OPP docket for this 
rulemaking. The objections submitted must specify the provisions of the 
regulation deemed objectionable and the grounds for the objections (40 
CFR 178.25). Each objection must be accompanied by the fee prescribed 
by 40 CFR 180.33(i). EPA is authorized to waive any fee requirement 
``when in the judgement of the Administrator such a waiver or refund is 
equitable and not contrary to the purpose of this subsection.'' For 
additional information regarding tolerance objection fee waivers, 
contact James Tompkins, Registration Division (7505C), Office of 
Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW., 
Washington, DC 20460. Office location, telephone number, and e-mail 
address: Rm. 239, Crystal Mall #2, 1921 Jefferson Davis Hwy., 
Arlington, VA, (703) 305-5697, tompkins.jim@epa.gov. Requests for 
waiver of tolerance objection fees should be sent to James Hollins, 
Information Resources and Services Division (7502C), Office of 
Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW., 
Washington, DC 20460.
     If a hearing is requested, the objections must include a statement 
of the factual issues on which a hearing is requested, the requestor's 
contentions on such issues, and a summary of any evidence relied upon 
by the requestor (40 CFR 178.27). A request for a hearing will be 
granted if the Administrator determines that the material submitted 
shows the following: There is genuine and substantial issue of fact; 
there is a reasonable possibility that available evidence identified by 
the requestor would, if established, resolve one or more of such issues 
in favor of the requestor, taking into account uncontested claims or 
facts to the contrary; and resolution of the factual issues in the 
manner sought by the requestor would be adequate to justify the action 
requested (40 CFR 178.32). Information submitted in connection with an 
objection or hearing request may be claimed confidential by marking any 
part or all of that information as CBI. Information so marked will not 
be disclosed except in accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CFR 
part 2. A copy of the information that does not contain CBI must be 
submitted for inclusion in the public record. Information not marked 
confidential may be disclosed publicly by EPA without prior notice.

II. Public Record and Electronic Submissions

     EPA has established a record for this regulation under docket 
control number [OPP-300791] (including any comments and data submitted 
electronically). A public version of this record, including printed, 
paper versions of electronic comments, which does not include any 
information claimed as CBI, is available for inspection from 8:30 a.m. 
to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The public 
record is located in Room 119 of the Public Information and Records 
Integrity Branch, Information Resources and Services Division (7502C), 
Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, Crystal 
Mall #2, 1921 Jefferson Davis Hwy., Arlington, VA.
     Objections and hearing requests may be sent by e-mail directly to 
EPA at:
    opp-docket@epa.gov.

     E-mailed objections and hearing requests must be submitted as an 
ASCII file avoiding the use of special characters and any form of 
encryption.
     The official record for this regulation, as well as the public 
version, as described in this unit will be kept in paper form. 
Accordingly, EPA will transfer any copies of objections and hearing 
requests received electronically into printed, paper form as they are 
received and will place the paper copies in the official record which 
will also include all comments submitted directly in writing. The 
official record is the paper record maintained at the Virginia address 
in ADDRESSES at the beginning of this document.

III. Regulatory Assessment Requirements

A. Certain Acts and Executive Orders

    This final rule establishes a tolerance under section 408 of the 
FFDCA. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these 
types of actions from review under Executive Order 12866, entitled 
Regulatory Planning and Review (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). This 
final rule does not contain any information collections subject to OMB 
approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et 
seq., or impose any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded mandate as 
described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 
(UMRA) (Pub. L. 104-4). Nor does it require any prior consultation as 
specficed by Executive Order 12875, entitled Enhancing the 
Intergovernmental Partnership (58 FR 58093, October 28, 1993), or 
special considerations as required by Executive Order 12898, entitled 
Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority 
Populations and Low-Income Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994), 
or require OMB review in accordance with Executive Order 13045, 
entitled Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and 
Safety Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997).
    In addition, since tolerances and exemptions that are established 
under section 408(l)(6) of FFDCA, such as the tolerance/exemption in 
this final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the 
requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et 
seq.) do not apply. Nevertheless, the Agency previously assessed 
whether establishing tolerances, exemptions from tolerances, raising 
tolerance levels or expanding exemptions might adversely impact small 
entities and concluded, as a generic matter, that there is no adverse 
economic impact. The factual basis for the Agency's generic 
certification for tolerance actions published on May 4, 1981 (46 FR 
24950), and was provided to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small 
Business Administration.

B. Executive Order 12875

    Under Executive Order 12875, entitled Enhancing the 
Intergovernmental Partnership (58 FR 58093, October 28, 1993), EPA may 
not issue a regulation that is not required by statute and that creates 
a mandate upon a State, local or tribal government, unless the Federal 
government provides the funds necessary to pay the direct compliance 
costs incurred by those governments. If the mandate is unfunded, EPA 
must provide to OMB a description of the extent of EPA's prior 
consultation with representatives of affected State, local, and tribal 
governments, the nature of their concerns, copies of any written 
communications from the governments, and a statement supporting the 
need to issue the regulation. In addition, Executive Order 12875 
requires EPA to develop an effective process permitting elected 
officials and other

[[Page 6532]]

representatives of State, local, and tribal governments ``to provide 
meaningful and timely input in the development of regulatory proposals 
containing significant unfunded mandates.''
    Today's rule does not create an unfunded Federal mandate on State, 
local, or tribal governments. The rule does not impose any enforceable 
duties on these entities. Accordingly, the requirements of section 1(a) 
of Executive Order 12875 do not apply to this rule.

C. Executive Order 13084

    Under Executive Order 13084, entitled Consultation and Coordination 
with Indian Tribal Governments (63 FR 27655, May 19, 1998), EPA may not 
issue a regulation that is not required by statute, that significantly 
or uniquely affects the communities of Indian tribal governments, and 
that imposes substantial direct compliance costs on those communities, 
unless the Federal government provides the funds necessary to pay the 
direct compliance costs incurred by the tribal governments. If the 
mandate is unfunded, EPA must provide OMB, in a separately identified 
section of the preamble to the rule, a description of the extent of 
EPA's prior consultation with representatives of affected tribal 
governments, a summary of the nature of their concerns, and a statement 
supporting the need to issue the regulation. In addition, Executive 
Order 13084 requires EPA to develop an effective process permitting 
elected officials and other representatives of Indian tribal 
governments ``to provide meaningful and timely input in the development 
of regulatory policies on matters that significantly or uniquely affect 
their communities.''
    Today's rule does not significantly or uniquely affect the 
communities of Indian tribal governments. This action does not involve 
or impose any requirements that affect Indian tribes. Accordingly, the 
requirements of section 3(b) of Executive Order 13084 do not apply to 
this rule.

IV. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General

    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the 
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally 
provides that before a rule may take effect, the Agency promulgating 
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, 
to each House of the Congress and the Comptroller General of the United 
States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other 
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 
Representatives and the Comptroller General of the United States prior 
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. This rule is not a 
``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements.


    Dated: January 28, 1999.

James Jones,

Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
    Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows:

PART 180--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority:  21 U.S.C. 346a and 371.

Sec. 180.317  [Amended]

    2. In Sec. 180.317, by amending the table in paragraph (b) by 
changing the date ``12/31/99'' to read ``12/31/01''.

[FR Doc. 99-3250 Filed 2-9-99; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-F
Propyzamide; Extension of Tolerance for Emergency Exemptions

Local Navigation
