![[logo] US EPA](http://www.epa.gov/epafiles/images/logo_epaseal.gif){kind=logo}
Trichoderma Harzianum Rifai Strain T-39; Exemption from the Requirement of a Tolerance
Note: EPA no longer updates this information, but it may be useful as a reference or resource.
[Federal Register: June 22, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 121)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 38753-38757]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr22jn00-14]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[OPP-300924; FRL-6383-7]
RIN 2070-AB78
Trichoderma Harzianum Rifai Strain T-39; Exemption from the
Requirement of a Tolerance
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes an exemption from the requirement
of a tolerance for residues of Trichoderma harzianum Rifai strain T-39
on all food commodities when applied/used as ground and certain foliar
applications. Makhteshim Agan of North America submitted a petition to
EPA under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as amended by the
Food Quality Protection Act of 1996 requesting an exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance. This regulation eliminates the need to
establish a maximum permissible level for residues of Trichoderma
harzianum Rifai strain T-39.
DATES: This regulation is effective June 22, 2000. Objections and
requests for hearings, identified by docket control number OPP-300924,
must be received by EPA on or before August 21, 2000.
ADDRESSES: Written objections and hearing requests may be submitted by
mail, in person, or by courier. Please follow the detailed instructions
for each method as provided in Unit VIII. of the ``SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION'' section. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, your objections
and hearing requests must identify docket control number OPP-300924 in
the subject line on the first page of your response.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: By mail: Shanaz Bacchus, Biopesticides
and Pollution Prevention Division (7511C), Office of Pesticide
Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, Ariel Rios Bldg., 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone number: 703-
308-8097; and e-mail address: bacchus.shanaz@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
You may be affected by this action if you are an agricultural
producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer. Potentially
affected categories and entities may include, but are not limited to:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Examples of Potentially
Categories NAICS Affected Entities
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Industry 111 Crop production
112 Animal production
311 Food manufacturing
32532 Pesticide manufacturing
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides
a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by this
action. Other types of entities not listed in the table could also be
affected. The North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS)
codes have been provided to assist you and others in determining
whether or not this action might apply to certain entities. If you have
questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular
entity, consult the person listed in the ``FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT'' section.
B. How Can I Get Additional Information, Including Copies of this
Document and Other Related Documents?
1. Electronically. You may obtain electronic copies of this
document, and certain other related documents that might be available
electronically, from the EPA Internet Home Page at http://www.epa.gov/.
To access this document, on the Home Page select ``Laws and
Regulations'' and then look up the entry for this document under the
``Federal Register--Environmental Documents.'' You can also go directly
to the Federal Register listings at http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/.
2. In person. The Agency has established an official record for
this action under docket control number OPP-300924. The official record
consists of the documents specifically referenced in this action, and
other information related to this action, including any information
claimed as Confidential Business Information (CBI). This official
record includes the documents that are physically located in the
docket, as well as the documents that are referenced in those
documents. The public version of the official record does not include
any information claimed as CBI. The public version of the official
record, which includes printed, paper versions of any electronic
comments submitted during an applicable comment period is available for
inspection in the Public Information and Records Integrity Branch
(PIRIB), Rm. 119, Crystal Mall #2, 1921 Jefferson Davis Hwy.,
Arlington, VA, from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. The PIRIB telephone number is (703) 305-5805.
[[Page 38754]]
II. Background and Statutory Findings
In the Federal Register of June 26, 1998 (63 FR 34390-34392) (FRL-
5794-9), EPA issued a notice pursuant to section 408 of the Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 21 U.S.C. 346a, as amended by the
Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA) (Public Law 104-170) announcing the
filing of a pesticide tolerance petition by Makhteshim Agan of North
America, (hereafter referred to as MANA), 551 Fifth Avenue, Suite 1100,
New York, NY 10176. This notice included a summary of the petition
prepared by the petitioner, MANA. There were no comments received in
response to the notice of filing.
The petition requested that 40 CFR part 180 be amended by
establishing an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for
residues of Trichoderma harzianum Rifai strain T-39.
III. Risk Assessment
New Section 408(c)(2)(A)(i) of the FFDCA allows EPA to establish an
exemption from the requirement for a tolerance (the legal limit for a
pesticide chemical residue in or on a food) only if EPA determines that
the tolerance is ``safe.'' Section 408(c)(2)(A)(ii) defines ``safe'' to
mean that ``there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result
from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue, including
all anticipated dietary exposures and all other exposures for which
there is reliable information.'' This includes exposure through
drinking water and in residential settings, but does not include
occupational exposure. Section 408(b)(2)(C) requires EPA to give
special consideration to exposure of infants and children to the
pesticide chemical residue in establishing a tolerance and to ``ensure
that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to
infants and children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical
residue...'' Additionally, section 408(b)(2)(D) requires that the
Agency consider ``available information'' concerning the cumulative
effects of a particular pesticide's residue and ``other substances''
that have a common mechanism of toxicity.
EPA performs a number of analyses to determine the risks from
aggregate exposure to pesticide residues. First, EPA determines the
toxicity of pesticides. Second, EPA examines exposure to the pesticide
through food, drinking water, and through other exposures that occur as
a result of pesticide us in residential settings.
IV. Toxicological Profile
Consistent with section 408(b)(2)(D) of FFDCA, EPA has reviewed the
available scientific data and other relevant information in support of
this action and considered its validity, completeness and reliability
and the relationship of this information to human risk. EPA has also
considered available information concerning the variability of the
sensitivities of major identifiable subgroups of consumers, including
infants and children.
Trichoderma harzianum strain T-39 was considered neither toxic nor
pathogenic based on the results of the Tier I toxicology studies. Tier
II and Tier III studies were not required because the results from the
Tier I studies were sufficient to satisfy guideline requirements. On
the basis of the studies submitted, it was considered a Toxicity
Category III pesticide for acute oral effects due to the amount dosed
only, and Toxicity Category IV for dermal and primary dermal irritation
health effects. These and additional toxicology studies are summarized
below.
1. Acute oral infectivity/pathogenicity. Based on the submitted
data, Trichoderma harzianum strain T-39 demonstrated a low toxicity
profile. It was not infectious, pathogenic or toxic to rats when
administered orally at 1.4 to 2.0 x 108 colony forming
units (cfu) per animal. Clearance and infectivity were evaluated in the
brain, blood, lymph nodes, kidney, liver, spleen, lungs, caecum and
feces. The microbe was detected only in fecal samples, and in those
samples a distinct clearance pattern was demonstrated throughout the
study.
2. Acute dermal toxicity. A single 1,150-1,570 mg/kg dose of
Trichoderma harzianum was applied dermally for a 24 hour exposure
period to rabbits. There were no clinical signs of toxicity and no
effects on mortality or body weight nor any signs of dermal irritation
during the study. The available information indicates that dermal
toxicity is not likely to occur with Trichoderma harzianum strain T-39.
3. Primary Dermal Irritation Study. A dermal application of 0.5g of
Trichoderma harzianum strain T-39 at 5 x 109 cfu/g
produced no dermal response in rabbits after a 4-hour exposure period.
The results of this study are classified as Supplementary, but taken in
conjunction with the acute dermal toxicity study, the microbial
pesticide is likely to be mildly irritating to skin. The pesticide was
classified as Toxicity Category IV for primary dermal irritation
effects.
4. Skin sensitization in guinea pig. Under the conditions of this
study, Trichoderma harzianum strain T-39 in physiological saline was
applied in occluded dermal patches. This study demonstrated potential
delayed contact hypersensitivity in guinea-pigs. This study was
designed to meet the requirements of the OECD Guidelines for Testing
Chemicals, and was submitted in support of fulfilling EPA data
requirements for hypersensitivity incidents. While the study is not a
substitute for reporting hypersensitivity incidents, it was considered
acceptable. However, the registrant must report any hypersensitivity
incidents to the Agency. The label must indicate that products
containing this active ingredient are likely to demonstrate a potential
for dermal sensitization.
5. Primary eye irritation. Three eye irritation studies were
submitted. Two acute eye irritation studies were conducted using
undiluted TGAI on a single male rabbit each time. The studies indicated
a potential for severe eye irritation, placing the undiluted TGAI in
acute Toxicity Category I. In one study, a single dose of 0.1g of the
active ingredient, approximately 5 x 108 cfu, was used to
treat one rabbit. The results indicated that the microbial pest control
agent (MPCA) TGAI, Trichoderma harzianum strain T-39, has the potential
to cause serious ocular damage. The active ingredient was a severe eye
irritant. In another study a single dose of 0.1g was administered into
the everted lower right eyelid of a sentinel male rabbit. The results
of this study indicated that a 3 minute, 180 ml saline rinse, applied 3
minutes post dosing, had no ameliorating effect on the irritancy of the
active ingredient. The adhesion of the TGAI to the conjunctivae
remained a serious effect of treatment even after rinsing.
However, another eye irritation study was done in which the test
material was the End-use Product (EP), Trichodex. Six male rabbits were
treated with a single dose of 0.1 ml (0.04 g) of Trichodex-EP into the
everted lower right eyelid. The maximum average irritation score was
determined to be 15.3 at 24 hours post dosing. There was no corneal
involvement after 72 hours and ocular irritation was no longer present
after 7 days, equivalent to a mildly irritating, or an acute Toxicity
Category III rating for the EP. This study was considered acceptable
and can be used for labeling of the EP. Workers, who are most likely to
be exposed to the pesticide during mixing/loading, application and post
application activities, are required to wear goggles to mitigate
against potential eye irritation.
6. Acute intraperitoneal toxicity/pathogenicity. Under conditions
of this study the LD50 for the EP, Trichodex,
[[Page 38755]]
administered via intraperitoneal injection was 644 mg/Kg in male rats,
1.087 mg/Kg in female rats and 806 mg/Kg for combined results from male
and female rats. The lowest dose administered, 1.5 x 107
cfu/animal, showed no indications of significant adverse effects. This
study was considered acceptable and is a substitute for the intravenous
study with fungi as active pesticidal ingredients.
7. Acute pulmonary toxicity/pathogenicity. Small 2 mm pale raised
areas were found in the lungs of some animals of both genders treated
with test material containing the active fungi. However, minimal
clinical signs and no deaths were observed. There were no significant
macroscopic lesions found in any test animals in the other experimental
groups. The active ingredient was not found in samples of liver, brain,
spleen, kidneys, lymph nodes or blood. Microbial clearance through the
caecum was evident. Although there was no evidence of the reproduction
of the microbe in the tissues, colony forming units persisted in the
lungs of animals treated with the active fungus. However, no adverse
effects were seen even in the absence of lung clearance by day 21.
Based on this study the TGAI was classified as Toxicity Category III.
Because the predominant inert ingredient is known to have associated
irritation and inhalation effects, the microbial, EP was classified as
an acute Toxicity Category II pesticide or likely to be a moderate
acute inhalation hazard. Workers who are most likely to be exposed
during mixing/loading, application and post application activities are
required to wear the recommended respirators with NIOSH prefixes, N-95,
P-95 or R-95, to mitigate against exposure.
8. Mouse Micronucleus Test. This study is not required under the
guidelines for registration of microbials but was submitted by the
registrant for consideration of the application. A preliminary toxicity
test using doses of 2,500 and 5,000 mg/Kg resulted in no deaths and no
significant chromosome damage. Subsequently, the main study was carried
out with administration of Trichodex suspended in 0.5% methyl cellulose
solution by oral gavage. Doses were 200, 1,000, or 5,000 mg/kg. Under
conditions of this test, there was no evidence of chromosomal damage
leading to micronucleus formation in polychromatic erythrocytes of
treated mice 24, 48, or 72 hours after dosing. The study was rated
supplemental.
V. Aggregate Exposures
In examining aggregate exposure, FFDCA section 408 directs EPA to
consider available information concerning exposures from the pesticide
residue in food and all other non-occupational exposures, including
drinking water from groundwater or surface water and exposure through
pesticide use in gardens, lawns, or buildings (residential and other
indoor uses).
A. Dietary Exposure
Dietary exposure to the microbial pesticide is likely to occur. The
lack of acute oral toxicity/pathogenicity, and the ubiquitous nature of
the microbial, support the establishment of an exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance for Trichoderma harzianum strain T-39.
1. Food. The microbial pesticide can be removed from foods by
washing, peeling, cooking and processing. Dietary exposure to the
microbial and the risk posed to adults, infants and children are likely
to be minimal, because of the low acute oral toxicity/pathogenicity
potential of the microbial pesticide.
2. Drinking water exposure. Oral exposure, at very low levels, may
occur from ingestion of drinking water. Drinking water is not being
screened for Trichoderma harzianum as a potential indicator of
microbial contamination. Both percolation through soil and municipal
treatment of drinking water would reduce the possibility of exposure to
the fungal active ingredient through drinking water. Therefore, the
potential of significant transfer of residues to drinking water is
minimal to non-existent. Even if negligible oral exposure should occur
through drinking water, the Agency concludes that such exposure would
present no risk due to the lack of acute oral toxicity/pathogenicity
and the ubiquitous nature of the microbe.
B. Other Non-Occupational Exposure
Dermal and inhalation exposure. Dermal and inhalation exposures and
risks to adults, infants and children via treated lawns or recreational
areas are not likely if the pesticide is applied as labeled. However,
should such exposures occur, adverse effects via the dermal and
inhalation routes are expected to be minimal based on the low toxicity
potential of this naturally occurring, ubiquitous microbe.
VI. Cumulative Effects
There are other species and strains of Trichoderma registered. The
Agency has received information to distinguish strain T-39 from other
registered strains. It is not clear to the Agency whether the
registered strains share a common mechanism of toxicity, or any
mechanism of toxicity with strain T-39. Because the data available
demonstrate a low toxicity/pathogenicity potential of the active
ingredient, the likelihood of adverse dietary effects is expected to be
minimal.
VII. Determination of Safety for U.S. Population, Infants and
Children
Based on the information in this preamble, EPA concludes that there
is a reasonable certainty of no harm from aggregate exposure to the
U.S. population to Trichoderma harzianum Rifai strain T-39 residues.
This includes all anticipated dietary exposures and all other exposures
for which there is reliable information. The Agency has imposed
appropriate risk mitigation measures to protect the at-risk worker
population from potential eye irritation and acute pulmonary effects.
These include goggles and appropriate dust-mist filtering respirators
which comply with the Worker Protection Standards.
VIII. Other Considerations
A. Endocrine Disruptors
EPA does not have any information regarding endocrine effects of
this microbial pesticide at this time. There is no evidence to suggest
that use of Trichoderma harzianum strain T-39 at the proposed
concentrations will adversely affect the endocrine system.
B. Analytical Method(s)
As part of the standard Quality Control measures, the Agency is
requiring microbial assays and analytical methods to identify the
active ingredient and potential contaminants. Analytical methods are
available and sufficient to identify metabolites and contaminants
within regulatory levels. All batches containing potential human
pathogens are to be destroyed.
C. Codex Maximum Residue Level
There are no Codex Maximum Residue Levels or exemption from
tolerances for the microbial active ingredient Trichoderma harzianum
strain T-39. There is an exemption from tolerance on all food
commodities except mushrooms for another strain of Trichoderma
harzianum, Rifai strain KRL-AG2, in the United States.
IX. Objections and Hearing Requests
Under section 408(g) of the FFDCA, as amended by the FQPA, any
person may file an objection to any aspect of this regulation and may
also request a hearing on those objections. The EPA procedural
regulations which govern the
[[Page 38756]]
submission of objections and requests for hearings appear in 40 CFR
part 178. Although the procedures in those regulations require some
modification to reflect the amendments made to the FFDCA by the FQPA of
1996, EPA will continue to use those procedures, with appropriate
adjustments, until the necessary modifications can be made. The new
section 408(g) provides essentially the same process for persons to
``object'' to a regulation for an exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance issued by EPA under new section 408(d), as was provided in
the old FFDCA sections 408 and 409. However, the period for filing
objections is now 60 days, rather than 30 days.
A. What Do I Need to Do to File an Objection or Request a Hearing?
You must file your objection or request a hearing on this
regulation in accordance with the instructions provided in this unit
and in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must
identify docket control number OPP-300924 in the subject line on the
first page of your submission. All requests must be in writing, and
must be mailed or delivered to the Hearing Clerk on or before August
21, 2000.
1. Filing the request. Your objection must specify the specific
provisions in the regulation that you object to, and the grounds for
the objections (40 CFR 178.25). If a hearing is requested, the
objections must include a statement of the factual issues(s) on which a
hearing is requested, the requestor's contentions on such issues, and a
summary of any evidence relied upon by the objector (40 CFR 178.27).
Information submitted in connection with an objection or hearing
request may be claimed confidential by marking any part or all of that
information as CBI. Information so marked will not be disclosed except
in accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2. A copy of the
information that does not contain CBI must be submitted for inclusion
in the public record. Information not marked confidential may be
disclosed publicly by EPA without prior notice.
Mail your written request to: Office of the Hearing Clerk (1900),
Environmental Protection Agency, Ariel Rios Bldg., 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460. You may also deliver your request to
the Office of the Hearing Clerk in Room C-400, Waterside Mall, 401 M
St., SW., Washington, DC 20460. The Office of the Hearing Clerk is open
from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays.
The telephone number for the Office of the Hearing Clerk is (202) 260-
4865.
2. Tolerance fee payment. If you file an objection or request a
hearing, you must also pay the fee prescribed by 40 CFR 180.33(i) or
request a waiver of that fee pursuant to 40 CFR 180.33(m). You must
mail the fee to: EPA Headquarters Accounting Operations Branch, Office
of Pesticide Programs, P.O. Box 360277M, Pittsburgh, PA 15251. Please
identify the fee submission be labeling it ``Tolerance Petition Fees.''
EPA is authorized to waive any fee requirement ``when in the
judgement of the Administrator such a waiver or refund is equitable and
not contrary to the purpose of this subsection.'' For additional
information regarding the waiver of these fees, you may contact James
Tompkins by phone at (703) 305-5697, by e-mail at tompkins.jim@epa.gov,
or by mailing a request for information to Mr. Tompkins at Registration
Division (7505C), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental
Protection Agency, Ariel Rios Bldg., 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460.
If you would like to request a waiver of the tolerance objection
fees, you must mail your request for such a waiver to: James Hollins,
Information Resources and Services Division (7502C), Office of
Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, Ariel Rios Bldg.,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460.
3. Copies for the Docket. In addition to filing an objection or
hearing request with the Hearing Clerk as described in Unit VIII.A. of
this preamble, you should also send a copy of your request to the PIRB
for its inclusion in the official record that is described in Unit
I.B.2. of this preamble. Mail your copies, identified by docket number
OPP-300924, to: Public Information and Records Integrity Branch,
Information Resources and Services Division (7502C), Office of
Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, Ariel Rios Bldg.,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460. In person or by
courier, bring a copy to the location of the PRIB described in Unit
I.B.2. of this preamble. You may also send an electronic copy of your
request via e-mail to: opp-docket@epa.gov. Please use an ASCII file
format and avoid the use of special characters and any form of
encryption. Copies of electronic objections and hearing requests will
also be accepted on disks in WordPerfect 6.1/8.0 file format or ASCII
file format. Do not include any CBI in your electronic copy. You may
also submit an electronic copy of your request at many Federal
Depository Libraries.
B. When Will the Agency Grant a Request for a Hearing?
A request for a hearing will be granted if the Administrator
determines that the material submitted shows the following: There is a
genuine and substantial issue of fact; there is a reasonable
possibility that available evidence identified by the requestor would,
if established resolve one or more of such issues in favor of the
requestor, taking into account uncontested claims or facts to the
contrary; and resolution of the factual issues(s) in the manner sought
by the requestor would be adequate to justify the action requested (40
CFR 178.32).
X. Regulatory Assessment Requirements
This final rule will establish an exemption from the tolerance
requirement under FFDCA section 408(e). The Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from review under
Executive Order 12866, entitled Regulatory Planning and Review (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993). This action does not contain any information
collections subject to OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act
(PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., or impose any enforceable duty or
contain any unfunded mandate as described under Title II of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Public Law 104-4). Nor
does it require any prior consultation as specified by Executive Order
13084, entitled Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments (63 FR 27655, May 19,1998); special considerations as
required by Executive Order 12898, entitled Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994); or require OMB review or
any Agency action under Executive Order 13045, entitled Protection of
Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997). This action does not involve any technical standards
that would require Agency consideration of voluntary consensus
standards pursuant to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act of 1995 (NTTAA), Public Law 104-113, section 12(d)
(15 U.S.C. 272 note). Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), the Agency previously assessed whether
establishing tolerances, exemptions from tolerances, raising tolerance
levels or expanding exemptions might adversely impact small entities
and concluded, as a generic matter, that
[[Page 38757]]
there is no adverse economic impact. The factual basis for the Agency's
generic certification for tolerance actions published on May 4, 1981
(46 FR 24950), and was provided to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of
the Small Business Administration. In addition, the Agency has
determined that this action will not have a substantial direct effect
on States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132,
entitled Federalism (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999). Executive Order
13132 requires EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure
``meaningful and timely input by State and local officials in the
development of regulatory policies that have federalism implications.''
``Policies that have federalism implications'' is defined in the
Executive Order to include regulations that have ``substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.'' This rule
directly regulates growers, food processors, food handlers and food
retailers, not States. This action does not alter the relationships or
distribution of power and responsibilities established by Congress in
the preemption provisions of FFDCA section 408(n)(4).
XI. Submission to Congress and the General Accounting Office
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of this final rule in the Federal Register. This final
rule is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: May 25, 2000.
Susan B. Hazen,
Acting Director, Office of Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows:
PART 180--[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346(a), and 371.
2. Section 180.1201 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 180.1201 Trichoderma harzianum strain T-39; exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance.
Trichoderma harzianum strain T-39 is exempt from the requirement of
a tolerance on all food commodities.
[FR Doc. 00-15723 Filed 6-21-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-F