Jump to main content.


Tebufenozide; Re-establish Tolerances for Emergency Exemptions

Note: EPA no longer updates this information, but it may be useful as a reference or resource.


 [Federal Register: June 22, 2001 (Volume 66, Number 121)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 33486-33489]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr22jn01-13]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[OPP-301141; FRL-6788-4]
RIN 2070-AB78
 
Tebufenozide; Re-establish Tolerances for Emergency Exemptions

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This regulation re-establishes time-limited tolerances for 
residues of the insecticide tebufenozide, benzoic acid, 3,5-dimethyl-1-
(1,1-dimethylethyl)-2-(4-ethylbenzoyl)hydrazide in or on eggs at 0.01 
part per million (ppm); grass, forage at 5 ppm; grass, hay at 18 ppm; 
hogs, liver at 1 ppm; hogs, mbyp at 0.1 ppm; peanuts at 0.05 ppm; 
peanut, hay at 5 ppm; peanut, meal at 0.15 ppm; peanut, oil at 0.15 
ppm; poultry, fat at 0.1 ppm; poultry, meat at 0.01 ppm; and poultry, 
mbyp at 0.05 ppm for an additional 2-year period. These tolerances will 
expire and are revoked on June 30, 2003. This action is in response to 
EPA's granting of an emergency exemption under section 18 of the 
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) authorizing 
use of the pesticide on peanuts and pasture. Section 408(l)(6) of the 
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) requires EPA to establish 
a time-limited tolerance or exemption from the requirement for a 
tolerance for pesticide chemical residues in food that will result from 
the use of a pesticide under an emergency exemption granted by EPA 
under section 18 of the FIFRA.

DATES: This regulation is effective June 22, 2001. Objections and 
requests for hearings, identified by docket control number OPP-301141, 
must be received by EPA on or before August 21, 2001.

ADDRESSES: Written objections and hearing requests may be submitted by 
mail, in person, or by courier. Please follow the detailed instructions 
for each method as provided in Unit III. of the SUPPLEMENTARY 
INFORMATION. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, your objections and 
hearing requests must identify docket control number OPP-301141 in the 
subject line on the first page of your response.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: By mail: Barbara Madden, Registration 
Division (7505C), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental 
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460; 
telephone

[[Page 33487]]

number:(703) 305-6463; and e-mail address: madden.barbara@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this Action Apply to Me?

    You may be affected by this action if you are an agricultural 
producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer. Potentially 
affected categories and entities may include, but are not limited to:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                           Examples
           Categories                 NAICS Codes         Potentially
                                                       Affected Entities
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Industry                          111                 Crop production
                                  112                 Animal production
                                  311                 Food manufacturing
                                  32532               Pesticide
                                                       manufacturing
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides 
a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by this 
action. Other types of entities not listed in the table could also be 
affected. The North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) 
codes have been provided to assist you and others in determining 
whether or not this action might apply to certain entities. If you have 
questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular 
entity, consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION 
CONTACT.

B. How Can I Get Additional Information, Including Copies of this 
Document and Other Related Documents?

    1. Electronically. You may obtain electronic copies of this 
document, and certain other related documents that might be available 
electronically, from the EPA Internet Home Page at http://www.epa.gov/. 
To access this document, on the Home Page select ``Laws and 
Regulations,'' ``Regulations and Proposed Rules,'' and then look up the 
entry for this document under the ``Federal Register--Environmental 
Documents.'' You can also go directly to the Federal Register listings 
at http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/.
    2. In person. The Agency has established an official record for 
this action under docket control number OPP-301141. The official record 
consists of the documents specifically referenced in this action, and 
other information related to this action, including any information 
claimed as Confidential Business Information (CBI). This official 
record includes the documents that are physically located in the 
docket, as well as the documents that are referenced in those 
documents. The public version of the official record does not include 
any information claimed as CBI. The public version of the official 
record, which includes printed, paper versions of any electronic 
comments submitted during an applicable comment period is available for 
inspection in the Public Information and Records Integrity Branch 
(PIRIB), Rm. 119, Crystal Mall #2, 1921 Jefferson Davis Hwy., 
Arlington, VA, from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, 
excluding legal holidays. The PIRIB telephone number is (703) 305-5805.

II. Background and Statutory Findings

     EPA issued a final rule, published in the Federal Register of 
December 18, 1998 (63 FR 70030) (FRL-6049-4), which announced that on 
its own initiative under section 408 of the FFDCA, 21 U.S.C. 346a, as 
amended by the Food Quality Protection Act of 1996 (FQPA) (Public Law 
104-170) it established time-limited tolerances for the residues of the 
insecticide tebufenozide, in or on eggs at 0.01 ppm; grass, forage at 5 
ppm; grass, hay at 18 ppm; hogs, liver at 1 ppm; hogs, mbyp at 0.1 ppm; 
peanuts at 0.05 ppm; peanut, hay at 5 ppm; peanut, meal at 0.15 ppm; 
peanut, oil at 0.15 ppm; poultry, fat at 0.1 ppm; poultry, meat at 0.01 
ppm; and poultry, mbyp at 0.05 ppm, with an expiration date of December 
31, 2000. EPA established these tolerances because section 408(l)(6) of 
the FFDCA requires EPA to establish a time-limited tolerance or 
exemption from the requirement for a tolerance for pesticide chemical 
residues in food that will result from the use of a pesticide under an 
emergency exemption granted by EPA under section 18 of the FIFRA. Such 
tolerances can be established without providing notice or period for 
public comment.
    EPA received a request to extend the use of tebufenozide on peanuts 
and pasture for this year's growing season. For peanuts the applicant 
claims that Lambda-cyhalothrin as well as other synthetic pyrethroids 
are ineffective in controlling the beet armyworm on peanuts. 
Researchers have found that the inherent resistant problem found in 
beet armyworm is associated with its enzyme system. These enzymes are 
commonly found in many of the cultivated and wild host plants. 
Researchers have shown that the induction of monooxygenases by host-
plant feeding reduces the toxicity of carbamate and pyrethroid 
insecticides to the beet armyworm. The petition claims that as much as 
a 20 percent yield loss could occur without an effective insecticide to 
control the beet armyworm.
    For pasture the armyworms have attacked pastures early this year 
and several states have availed themselves of the authority to declare 
a crisis including: Arkansas, Missouri, Kentucky, and Mississippi. 
Armyworms cause serious damage to hay and pasture lands. There have 
been many years where entire pastures have been destroyed by this 
insect. The primary advantage of tebufenozide is the short period of 
time between treatment and re-entry or harvest. After having reviewed 
the submission, EPA concurs that emergency conditions exist. EPA has 
authorized under FIFRA section 18 the use of tebufenozide on peanuts in 
Oklahoma and pasture land in Tennessee, Arkansas, Missouri, Kentucky, 
and Mississippi for control of armyworms.
    EPA assessed the potential risks presented by residues of 
tebufenozide in or on peanuts and pasture. In doing so, EPA considered 
the safety standard in FFDCA section 408(b)(2), and decided that the 
necessary tolerance under FFDCA section 408(l)(6) would be consistent 
with the safety standard and with FIFRA section 18. The data and other 
relevant material have been evaluated and discussed in the final rule 
of December 18, 1998 (63 FR 70030) (FRL-6049-4). Based on that data and 
information considered, the Agency reaffirms that re-establishment of 
the time-limited tolerances will continue to meet the requirements of 
section 408(l)(6). Therefore, the time-limited tolerances are re-
established for an additional 2-year period. EPA will publish a 
document in the Federal Register to remove the revoked tolerance from 
the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). Although these tolerances will 
expire and are revoked on June 30, 2003, under FFDCA section 408(l)(5), 
residues of the pesticide not in excess of the amounts specified in the 
tolerance remaining in or on eggs; grass, forage; grass, hay; hogs, 
liver; hogs, mbyp; peanuts; peanut, hay; peanuts, meal; peanut, oil; 
poultry, fat; poultry, meat; and poultry, mbyp after that date will not 
be unlawful, provided the pesticide is applied in a manner that was 
lawful under FIFRA and the application occurred prior to the revocation 
of the tolerance. EPA will take action to revoke these tolerances 
earlier if any experience with, scientific data on, or other relevant 
information on this pesticide indicate that the residues are not safe.

[[Page 33488]]

III. Objections and Hearing Requests

    Under section 408(g) of the FFDCA, as amended by the FQPA, any 
person may file an objection to any aspect of this regulation and may 
also request a hearing on those objections. The EPA procedural 
regulations which govern the submission of objections and requests for 
hearings appear in 40 CFR part 178. Although the procedures in those 
regulations require some modification to reflect the amendments made to 
the FFDCA by the FQPA of 1996, EPA will continue to use those 
procedures, with appropriate adjustments, until the necessary 
modifications can be made. The new section 408(g) provides essentially 
the same process for persons to ``object'' to a regulation for an 
exemption from the requirement of a tolerance issued by EPA under new 
section 408(d), as was provided in the old FFDCA sections 408 and 409. 
However, the period for filing objections is now 60 days, rather than 
30 days.

A. What Do I Need to Do to File an Objection or Request a Hearing?

    You must file your objection or request a hearing on this 
regulation in accordance with the instructions provided in this unit 
and in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must 
identify docket control number OPP-301141 in the subject line on the 
first page of your submission. All requests must be in writing, and 
must be mailed or delivered to the Hearing Clerk on or before August 
21, 2001.
    1. Filing the request. Your objection must specify the specific 
provisions in the regulation that you object to, and the grounds for 
the objections (40 CFR 178.25). If a hearing is requested, the 
objections must include a statement of the factual issues(s) on which a 
hearing is requested, the requestor's contentions on such issues, and a 
summary of any evidence relied upon by the objector (40 CFR 178.27). 
Information submitted in connection with an objection or hearing 
request may be claimed confidential by marking any part or all of that 
information as CBI. Information so marked will not be disclosed except 
in accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2. A copy of the 
information that does not contain CBI must be submitted for inclusion 
in the public record. Information not marked confidential may be 
disclosed publicly by EPA without prior notice.
    Mail your written request to: Office of the Hearing Clerk (1900), 
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., 
Washington, DC 20460. You may also deliver your request to the Office 
of the Hearing Clerk in Rm. C400, Waterside Mall, 401 M St., SW., 
Washington, DC 20460. The Office of the Hearing Clerk is open from 8 
a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The 
telephone number for the Office of the Hearing Clerk is (202) 260-4865.
    2. Tolerance fee payment. If you file an objection or request a 
hearing, you must also pay the fee prescribed by 40 CFR 180.33(I) or 
request a waiver of that fee pursuant to 40 CFR 180.33(m). You must 
mail the fee to: EPA Headquarters Accounting Operations Branch, Office 
of Pesticide Programs, P.O. Box 360277M, Pittsburgh, PA 15251. Please 
identify the fee submission by labeling it ``Tolerance Petition Fees.''
    EPA is authorized to waive any fee requirement ``when in the 
judgement of the Administrator such a waiver or refund is equitable and 
not contrary to the purpose of this subsection.'' For additional 
information regarding the waiver of these fees, you may contact James 
Tompkins by phone at (703) 305-5697, by e-mail at tompkins.jim@epa.gov, 
or by mailing a request for information to Mr. Tompkins at Registration 
Division (7505C), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental 
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460.
    If you would like to request a waiver of the tolerance objection 
fees, you must mail your request for such a waiver to: James Hollins, 
Information Resources and Services Division (7502C), Office of 
Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania 
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460.
    3. Copies for the docket. In addition to filing an objection or 
hearing request with the Hearing Clerk as described in Unit III.A., you 
should also send a copy of your request to the PIRIB for its inclusion 
in the official record that is described in Unit I.B.2. Mail your 
copies, identified by docket control number OPP-301141, to: Public 
Information and Records Integrity Branch, Information Resources and 
Services Division (7502C), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental 
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460. 
In person or by courier, bring a copy to the location of the PIRIB 
described in Unit I.B.2. You may also send an electronic copy of your 
request via e-mail to: opp-docket@epa.gov. Please use an ASCII file 
format and avoid the use of special characters and any form of 
encryption. Copies of electronic objections and hearing requests will 
also be accepted on disks in WordPerfect 6.1/8.0 or ASCII file format. 
Do not include any CBI in your electronic copy. You may also submit an 
electronic copy of your request at many Federal Depository Libraries.

B. When Will the Agency Grant a Request for a Hearing?

    A request for a hearing will be granted if the Administrator 
determines that the material submitted shows the following: There is a 
genuine and substantial issue of fact; there is a reasonable 
possibility that available evidence identified by the requestor would, 
if established resolve one or more of such issues in favor of the 
requestor, taking into account uncontested claims or facts to the 
contrary; and resolution of the factual issues(s) in the manner sought 
by the requestor would be adequate to justify the action requested (40 
CFR 178.32).

IV. Regulatory Assessment Requirements

    This final rule establishes time-limited [tolerances]
under FFDCA 
section 408. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted 
these types of actions from review under Executive Order 12866, 
entitled Regulatory Planning and Review (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). 
This final rule does not contain any information collections subject to 
OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et 
seq., or impose any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded mandate as 
described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 
(UMRA) (Public Law 104-4). Nor does it require any special 
considerations under Executive Order 12898, entitled Federal Actions to 
Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income 
Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994); or OMB review or any other 
Agency action under Executive Order 13045, entitled Protection of 
Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks (62 FR 19885, 
April 23, 1997). This action does not involve any technical standards 
that would require Agency consideration of voluntary consensus 
standards pursuant to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer 
and Advancement Act of 1995 (NTTAA), Public Law 104-113, section 12(d) 
(15 U.S.C. 272 note). Since tolerances and exemptions that are 
established on the basis of a FIFRA section 18 petition under FFDCA 
section 408, such as the tolerances in this final rule, do not require 
the issuance of a proposed rule, the requirements of the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) do not apply. In addition, 
the Agency has determined that this action will not have a substantial 
direct effect on States, on the relationship between

[[Page 33489]]

the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power 
and responsibilities among the various levels of government, as 
specified in Executive Order 13132, entitled Federalism (64 FR 43255, 
August 10, 1999). Executive Order 13132 requires EPA to develop an 
accountable process to ensure ``meaningful and timely input by State 
and local officials in the development of regulatory policies that have 
federalism implications.'' ``Policies that have federalism 
implications'' is defined in the Executive Order to include regulations 
that have ``substantial direct effects on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government.'' This final rule directly regulates growers, food 
processors, food handlers and food retailers, not States. This action 
does not alter the relationships or distribution of power and 
responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions 
of FFDCA section 408(n)(4).
    For these same reasons, the Agency has determined that this rule 
does not have any ``tribal implications'' as described in Executive 
Order 13175, entitled Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 
Governments (65 FR 67249, November 6, 2000). Executive Order 13175, 
requires EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure ``meaningful 
and timely input by tribal officials in the development of regulatory 
policies that have tribal implications.'' ``Policies that have tribal 
implications'' is defined in the Executive Order to include regulations 
that have ``substantial direct effects on one or more Indian tribes, on 
the relationship between the Federal government and the Indian tribes, 
or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the 
Federal government and Indian tribes.'' This rule will not have 
substantial direct effects on tribal governments, on the relationship 
between the Federal government and Indian tribes, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal 
government and Indian tribes, as specified in Executive Order 13175. 
Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this rule.

V. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General

    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the 
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally 
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating 
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, 
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the 
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other 
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior 
to publication of this final rule in the Federal Register. This final 
rule is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: June 11, 2001.

Peter Caulkins,
Acting Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.

    Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows:

PART 180--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346(a) and 371.

Sec. 180.482  [Amended]

    2. In Sec. 180.482, amend paragraph (b) by revising the date 
``December 30, 2000'' to read ``June 30, 2003'' for eggs; grass, 
forage; grass, hay; peanuts; peanut, hay; peanuts, meal; peanut, oil; 
poultry, fat; poultry, meat; and poultry, mbyp.''

[FR Doc. 01-15621 Filed 6-21-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-S 

Local Navigation


Jump to main content.