Methoxyfenozide; Pesticide Tolerance

Note: EPA no longer updates this information, but it may be useful as a reference or resource.

[Federal Register: May 30, 2003 (Volume 68, Number 104)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 32384-32390]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr30my03-19]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[OPP-2003-0088; FRL-7308-6]

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This regulation establishes tolerances for residues of
methoxyfenozide in or on cranberry; okra; pea, blackeyed, seed; pea,
southern, seed; turnip, greens; and vegetable, cucurbit, group 9. The
Interregional Research Project Number 4 (IR-4) requested these
tolerances under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), as
amended by the Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA) of 1996.

DATES: This regulation is effective May 30, 2003. Objections and
requests for hearings, identified by docket ID number OPP-2003-0088,
must be received on or before July 29, 2003.

ADDRESSES: Written objections and hearing requests may be submitted
electronically, by mail, or through hand delivery/courier. Please
follow the detailed instructions as provided in Unit VI. of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: By mail: Shaja R. Brothers,
Registration Division (7505C), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number: (703) 308-3194; e-mail
address: brothers.shaja@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this Action Apply to Me?

You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
Potentially affected entities may include, but are not limited to:
? Crop production (NAICS 111)
? Animal production (NAICS 112)
? Food manufacturing (NAICS 311)
? Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS 32532)
This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides
a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by this
action. Other types of entities not listed in this unit could also be
affected. The North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS)
codes have been provided to assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to certain entities. If you have any
questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular
entity, consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.

B. How Can I Get Copies of this Document and Other Related Information?

1. Docket. EPA has established an official public docket for this
action under docket identification ID number OPP-2003-0088. The
official public docket consists of the documents specifically
referenced in this action, any public comments received, and other
information related to this action. Although a part of the official
docket, the public docket does not include Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute. The official public docket is the collection of materials
that is available for public viewing at the Public Information and
Records Integrity Branch (PIRIB), Rm. 119, Crystal Mall #2,
1921 Jefferson Davis Hwy., Arlington, VA. This docket facility is open
from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The docket telephone number is (703) 305-5805.
2. Electronic access. You may access this Federal Register document
electronically through the EPA Internet under the ``Federal Register''
listings at http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/. A frequently updated
electronic version of 40 CFR part 180 is available at
http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/cfrhtml_00/Title_40/40cfr180_00.html,
a beta site currently under development.
An electronic version of the public docket is available through
EPA's

[[Page 32385]]

electronic public docket and comment system, EPA Dockets. You may use
EPA Dockets at http://www.regulations.gov/ to submit or view public
comments, access the index listing of the contents of the official
public docket, and to access those documents in the public docket that
are available electronically. Although not all docket materials may be
available electronically, you may still access any of the publicly
available docket materials through the docket facility identified in
Unit I.B.1. Once in the system, select ``search,'' then key in the
appropriate docket ID number.

II. Background and Statutory Findings

In the Federal Register of August 14, 2002 (67 FR 52996) (FRL-7191-
9), EPA issued a notice pursuant to section 408 of FFDCA, 21 U.S.C.
346a, as amended by FQPA (Public Law 104-170), announcing the filing of
a pesticide petition 2E6441 by IR-4, 681 U.S. Highway #1 South,
North Brunswick, NJ 08902-3390. That notice included a summary of the
petitions prepared by Rohm and Haas Company, the registrant. There were
no comments received in response to the notice of filing. In the
Federal Register of March 21, 2003 (68 FR 13917) (FRL-7297-1), EPA
issued a notice pursuant to section 408 of FFDCA, 21 U.S.C. 346a, as
amended by FQPA (Public Law 104-170), announcing the filing of
pesticide petitions (3E6527, 3E6528, and 3E6533) by IR-4, 681 U.S.
Highway #1 South, North Brunswick, NJ 08902-3390. That notice
included a summary of the petitions prepared by Rohm and Haas Company,
the registrant. There were no comments received in response to the
notice of filing.
The petitions requested that 40 CFR 180.544 be amended by
establishing tolerances for residues of the insecticide
methoxyfenozide, benzoic acid, 3-methoxy-2-methyl-, 2-(3,5-
dimethylbenzoyl)-2-(1,1-dimethylethyl) hydrazide, in or on cranberry at
0.5 parts per million (ppm); okra at 2.0 ppm; pea, blackeyed, seed at
4.0 ppm; pea, southern, seed at 4.0 ppm; turnip, greens at 30 ppm; and
vegetable, cucurbit, group 9 at 0.3 ppm.
Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of the FFDCA allows EPA to establish a
tolerance (the legal limit for a pesticide chemical residue in or on a
food) only if EPA determines that the tolerance is ``safe.'' Section
408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of the FFDCA defines ``safe'' to mean that ``there is
a reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure
to the pesticide chemical residue, including all anticipated dietary
exposures and all other exposures for which there is reliable
information.'' This includes exposure through drinking water and in
residential settings, but does not include occupational exposure.
Section 408(b)(2)(C) of the FFDCA requires EPA to give special
consideration to exposure of infants and children to the pesticide
chemical residue in establishing a tolerance and to ``ensure that there
is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to infants and
children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue. . .
.''
EPA performs a number of analyses to determine the risks from
aggregate exposure to pesticide residues. For further discussion of the
regulatory requirements of section 408 of the FFDCA and a complete
description of the risk assessment process, see the final rule on
Bifenthrin Pesticide Tolerances November 26, 1997 (62 FR 62961) (FRL-
5754-7).

III. Aggregate Risk Assessment and Determination of Safety

Consistent with section 408(b)(2)(D) of the FFDCA, EPA has reviewed
the available scientific data and other relevant information in support
of this action. EPA has sufficient data to assess the hazards of and to
make a determination on aggregate exposure, consistent with section
408(b)(2) of the FFDCA, for tolerances for residues of methoxyfenozide
on cranberry at 0.5 ppm; okra at 2.0 ppm; pea, blackeyed, seed at 4.0
ppm; pea, southern, seed at 4.0 ppm; turnip, greens at 30 ppm; and
vegetable, cucurbit, group 9 at 0.3 ppm. EPA's assessment of exposures
and risks associated with establishing these tolerances follow.

A. Toxicological Profile

EPA has evaluated the available toxicity data and considered its
validity, completeness, and reliability as well as the relationship of
the results of the studies to human risk. EPA has also considered
available information concerning the variability of the sensitivities
of major identifiable subgroups of consumers, including infants and
children. The nature of the toxic effects caused by methoxyfenozide is
discussed in Unit II.A. of the Federal Register of September 20, 2002
(67 FR 59193) (FRL-7198-5).

B. Toxicological Endpoints

The dose at which no observed adverse effects levels are (the
NOAEL) from the toxicology study identified as appropriate for use in
risk assessment is used to estimate the toxicological level of concern.
However, the lowest dose observed at which adverse effects levels of
concern are identified (the LOAEL) is sometimes used for risk
assessment if no NOAEL was achieved in the toxicology study selected.
An uncertainty factor (UF) is applied to reflect uncertainties inherent
in the extrapolation from laboratory animal data to humans and in the
variations in sensitivity among members of the human population as well
as other unknowns. An UF of 100 is routinely used, 10X to account for
interspecies differences and 10X for intraspecies differences.
For dietary risk assessment (other than cancer) the Agency uses the
UF to calculate an acute or chronic reference dose (aRfD or cRfD) where
the RfD is equal to the NOAEL divided by the appropriate UF (RfD =
NOAEL/UF). Where an additional safety factor (SF) is retained due to
concerns unique to the FQPA, this additional factor is applied to the
RfD by dividing the RfD by such additional factor. The acute or chronic
Population Adjusted Dose (aPAD or cPAD) is a modification of the RfD to
accommodate this type of FQPA SF.
For non-dietary risk assessments (other than cancer) the UF is used
to determine the LOC. For example, when 100 is the appropriate UF (10X
to account for interspecies differences and 10X for intraspecies
differences) the LOC is 100. To estimate risk, a ratio of the NOAEL to
exposures (margin of exposure (MOE) = NOAEL/exposure) is calculated and
compared to the LOC.
The linear default risk methodology (Q*) is the primary method
currently used by the Agency to quantify carcinogenic risk. The Q*
approach assumes that any amount of exposure will lead to some degree
of cancer risk. A Q* is calculated and used to estimate risk which
represents a probability of occurrence of additional cancer cases
(e.g., risk is expressed as 1 x 10-6 or one in a million).
Under certain specific circumstances, MOE calculations will be used for
the carcinogenic risk assessment. In this non-linear approach, a
``point of departure'' is identified below which carcinogenic effects
are not expected. The point of departure is typically a NOAEL based on
an endpoint related to cancer effects though it may be a different
value derived from the dose response curve. To estimate risk, a ratio
of the point of departure to exposure (MOE_cancer = point of
departure/exposures) is calculated. A summary of the toxicological
endpoints for methoxyfenozide used for human risk assessment is
discussed in Unit II.B. of the Federal Register of September 20, 2002
(67 FR 59193).

C. Exposure Assessment

1. Dietary exposure from food and feed uses. Tolerances have been
established (40 CFR 180.544) for the

[[Page 32386]]

residues of methoxyfenozide, in or on a variety of raw agricultural
commodities including pome fruit, cottonseed, and animals (except
poultry). Residues in plants, milk, meat and fat are regulated in terms
of parent compound only. Residues in liver and meat byproducts (except
liver) are regulated in terms of combined residues of methoxyfenozide
and its glucuronide metabolite (RH-141,518). Risk assessments were
conducted by EPA to assess dietary exposures from methoxyfenozide in
food as follows:
i. Acute exposure. Acute dietary risk assessments are performed for
a food-use pesticide if a toxicological study has indicated the
possibility of an effect of concern occurring as a result of a 1 day or
single exposure. The Dietary Exposure Evaluation Model
(DEEMTM) analysis evaluated the individual food consumption
as reported by respondents in the United States Department of
Agriculture (USDA) 1989-1992 nationwide Continuing Surveys of Food
Intake by Individuals (CSFII) and accumulated exposure to the chemical
for each commodity. The following assumptions were made for the acute
exposure assessments: No appropriate endpoint was identified in the
oral toxicity studies including the acute neurotoxicity study in rats
and the developmental toxicity studies in rats and rabbits.
ii. Chronic exposure. In conducting this chronic dietary risk
assessment the DEEMTM analysis evaluated the individual food
consumption as reported by respondents in the USDA 1989-1992 or 1994-
1996, nationwide CSFII and accumulated exposure to the chemical for
each commodity. The following assumptions were made for the chronic
exposure assessments: A Tier 1 (assumptions: Tolerance level residues
and 100 percent crop treated) chronic dietary risk assessment was
conducted via DEEMTM. The established tolerances of 40 CFR
180.544 and the proposed tolerances were included in the analysis.
DEEMTM default processing factors (from DEEMTM
Version 7.76) were used for all processed commodities that do not have
individual tolerances.
iii. Cancer. Methoxyfenozide is classified as a ``not likely''
human carcinogen.
2. Dietary exposure from drinking water. The Agency lacks
sufficient monitoring exposure data to complete a comprehensive dietary
exposure analysis and risk assessment for methoxyfenozide in drinking
water. Because the Agency does not have comprehensive monitoring data,
drinking water concentration estimates are made by reliance on
simulation or modeling taking into account data on the physical
characteristics of methoxyfenozide.
The Agency uses the Generic Estimated Environmental Concentration
(GENEEC) or the Pesticide Root Zone/Exposure Analysis Modeling System
(PRZM/EXAMS) to estimate pesticide concentrations in surface water and
SCI-GROW, which predicts pesticide concentrations in ground water. In
general, EPA will use GENEEC (a Tier 1 model) before using PRZM/EXAMS
(a Tier 2 model) for a screening-level assessment for surface water.
The GENEEC model is a subset of the PRZM/EXAMS model that uses a
specific high-end runoff scenario for pesticides. GENEEC incorporates a
farm pond scenario, while PRZM/EXAMS incorporate an index reservoir
environment in place of the previous pond scenario. The PRZM/EXAMS
model includes a percent crop (PC) area factor as an adjustment to
account for the maximum PC coverage within a watershed or drainage
basin.
None of these models include consideration of the impact processing
(mixing, dilution, or treatment) of raw water for distribution as
drinking water would likely have on the removal of pesticides from the
source water. The primary use of these models by the Agency at this
stage is to provide a coarse screen for sorting out pesticides for
which it is highly unlikely that drinking water concentrations would
ever exceed human health levels of concern.
Since the models used are considered to be screening tools in the
risk assessment process, the Agency does not use estimated
environmental concentrations (EECs) from these models to quantify
drinking water exposure and risk as a %RfD or %PAD. Instead drinking
water levels of comparison (DWLOCs) are calculated and used as a point
of comparison against the model estimates of a pesticide's
concentrations in water. DWLOCs are theoretical upper limits on a
pesticide's concentration in drinking water in light of total aggregate
exposure to a pesticide in food and from residential uses. Since DWLOCs
address total aggregate exposure to methoxyfenozide they are further
discussed in the aggregate risk sections in Unit III.E.
Based on the PRZM/EXAMS model, the EECs of methoxyfenozide for
surface water are estimated to be 43 parts per billion (ppb) for acute,
and 30 ppb for chronic. Based on the SCI-GROW model the EEC of
methoxyfenozide for acute and chronic exposures for ground water are
estimated to be 3.5 ppb.
3. From non-dietary exposure. The term ``residential exposure'' is
used in this document to refer to non-occupational, non-dietary
exposure (e.g., for lawn and garden pest control, indoor pest control,
termiticides, and flea and tick control on pets).
Methoxyfenozide is not registered for use on any sites that would
result in residential exposure.
4. Cumulative exposure to substances with a common mechanism of
toxicity. Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of the FFDCA requires that, when
considering whether to establish, modify, or revoke a tolerance, the
Agency consider ``available information'' concerning the cumulative
effects of a particular pesticide's residues and ``other substances
that have a common mechanism of toxicity.''
EPA does not have, at this time, available data to determine
whether methoxyfenozide has a common mechanism of toxicity with other
substances. Unlike other pesticides for which EPA has followed a
cumulative risk approach based on a common mechanism of toxicity, EPA
has not made a common mechanism of toxicity finding as to
methoxyfenozide and any other substances and methoxyfenozide does not
appear to produce a toxic metabolite produced by other substances. For
the purposes of this tolerance action, therefore, EPA has not assumed
that methoxyfenozide has a common mechanism of toxicity with other
substances. For information regarding EPA's efforts to determine which
chemicals have a common mechanism of toxicity and to evaluate the
cumulative effects of such chemicals, see the policy statements
released by EPA's Office of Pesticide Programs concerning common
mechanism determinations and procedures for cumulating effects from
substances found to have a common mechanism on EPA's website at
http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/cumulative/.

D. Safety Factor for Infants and Children

1. In general. Section 408 of the FFDCA provides that EPA shall
apply an additional tenfold margin of safety for infants and children
in the case of threshold effects to account for prenatal and postnatal
toxicity and the completeness of the data base on toxicity and exposure
unless EPA determines that a different margin of safety will be safe
for infants and children. Margins of safety are incorporated into EPA
risk assessments either directly through use of a MOE

[[Page 32387]]

analysis or through using uncertainty (safety) factors in calculating a
dose level that poses no appreciable risk to humans.
2. Prenatal and postnatal sensitivity. The toxicology data base for
methoxyfenozide included acceptable developmental toxicity studies in
both rats and rabbits as well as a 2-generation reproductive toxicity
study in rats. The data provided no indication of increased sensitivity
of rats or rabbits to in utero and/or postnatal exposure to
methoxyfenozide.
3. Conclusion. There is a complete toxicity data base for
methoxyfenozide and exposure data are complete or are estimated based
on data that reasonably accounts for potential exposures. EPA
determined that the 10X SF to protect infants and children should be
reduced to 1X for the following reasons:
? Based on weight-of-evidence considerations, EPA determined
that a developmental neurotoxicity study in rats is not required to
support the registration of methoxyfenozide.
? In developmental toxicity studies in rats and rabbits, no
increased susceptibility in fetuses as compared to maternal animals was
observed following in utero exposures.
? In a 2-generation reproduction study in rats, no increased
susceptibility in pups as compared to adults was observed following in
utero and postnatal exposures.
? The exposure assessments will not underestimate the
potential dietary (food and drinking water) or non-dietary exposures
for infants and children from the use of methoxyfenozide.

E. Aggregate Risks and Determination of Safety

To estimate total aggregate exposure to a pesticide from food,
drinking water, and residential uses, the Agency calculates DWLOCs
which are used as a point of comparison against the model estimates of
a pesticide's concentration in water (EECs). DWLOC values are not
regulatory standards for drinking water. DWLOCs are theoretical upper
limits on a pesticide's concentration in drinking water in light of
total aggregate exposure to a pesticide in food and residential uses.
In calculating a DWLOC, the Agency determines how much of the
acceptable exposure (i.e., the PAD) is available for exposure through
drinking water e.g., allowable chronic water exposure milligrams/
kilogram/day (mg/kg/day) = cPAD - (average food + residential
exposure). This allowable exposure through drinking water is used to
calculate a DWLOC.
A DWLOC will vary depending on the toxic endpoint, drinking water
consumption, and body weights. Default body weights and consumption
values as used by the EPA's Office of Water are used to calculate
DWLOCs: 2 liter (L)/70 kg (adult male), 2L/60 kg (adult female), and
1L/10 kg (child). Default body weights and drinking water consumption
values vary on an individual basis. This variation will be taken into
account in more refined screening-level and quantitative drinking water
exposure assessments. Different populations will have different DWLOCs.
Generally, a DWLOC is calculated for each type of risk assessment used:
Acute, short-term, intermediate-term, chronic, and cancer.
When EECs for surface water and ground water are less than the
calculated DWLOCs, EPA concludes with reasonable certainty that
exposures to the pesticide in drinking water (when considered along
with other sources of exposure for which EPA has reliable data) would
not result in unacceptable levels of aggregate human health risk at
this time. Because EPA considers the aggregate risk resulting from
multiple exposure pathways associated with a pesticide's uses, levels
of comparison in drinking water may vary as those uses change. If new
uses are added in the future, EPA will reassess the potential impacts
of residues of the pesticide in drinking water as a part of the
aggregate risk assessment process.
1. Acute risk. No appropriate endpoint was identified in the oral
toxicity studies including the acute neurotoxicity study in rats and
the developmental toxicity studies in rats and rabbits. Accordingly, no
acute risk is expected from exposure to methoxyfenozide.
2. Chronic risk. Using the exposure assumptions described in this
unit for chronic exposure, EPA has concluded that exposure to
methoxyfenozide from food will utilize 20.5% of the cPAD for the U.S.
population, 26.4% of the cPAD for all infant <1 year old, and 46.4% of
the cPAD for children 1-2 years old. There are no residential uses for
methoxyfenozide that result in chronic residential exposure to
methoxyfenozide. In addition, there is potential for chronic dietary
exposure to methoxyfenozide in drinking water. After calculating DWLOCs
and comparing them to the EECs for surface water and ground water, EPA
does not expect the aggregate exposure to exceed 100% of the cPAD, as
shown in the following Table 1:

Table 1.--Aggregate Risk Assessment for Chronic (Non-Cancer) Exposure to Methoxyfenozide
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Surface Ground
Population Subgroup cPAD mg/kg/ % cPAD Water EEC Water EEC Chronic
day (Food) (ppb) (ppb) DWLOC (ppb)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. population 0.102 20.5 30 3.5 2,800
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All infants (<1 year old) 0.102 26.4 30 3.5 750
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Children (1-2 years old) 0.102 46.4 30 3.5 550
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Females (13-49 years old) 0.102 18.3 30 3.5 2,500
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

3. Short-term risk. Short-term aggregate exposure takes into
account residential exposure plus chronic exposure to food and water
(considered to be a background exposure level). Methoxyfenozide is not
registered for use on any sites that would result in residential
exposure. Therefore, the aggregate risk is the sum of the risk from
food and water, which do not exceed the Agency's level of concern.
4. Intermediate-term risk. Intermediate-term aggregate exposure
takes into account residential exposure plus chronic exposure to food
and water (considered to be a background exposure level).
Methoxyfenozide is not registered for use on any sites that would
result in residential exposure. Therefore, the aggregate risk is the
sum of the risk from food and water, which do not exceed the Agency's
level of concern.

[[Page 32388]]

5. Aggregate cancer risk for U.S. population. The Agency has
classified methoxyfenozide as a ``not likely'' human carcinogen
according to the EPA Proposed Guidelines for Carcinogen Risk Assessment
(April 10, 1996). This classification is based on the lack of evidence
of carcinogenicity in male and female rats as well as in male and
female mice and on the lack of genotoxicity in an acceptable battery of
mutagenicity studies. Therefore, methoxyfenozide is not expected to
pose a cancer risk.
6. Determination of safety. Based on these risk assessments, EPA
concludes that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result
to the general population, and to infants and children from aggregate
exposure to methoxyfenozide residues.

IV. Other Considerations

A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology

Adequate enforcement methods are available for determination of
methoxyfenozide residues in plant commodities. The similar methods that
are used vary depending on the matrices involved. The enforcement
method TR 34-98-87 high performance liquid chromotography using ultra-
violet detection (HPLC/UV) was used for data collection in all crop
field trials on the subject crops. It measures residues of
methoxyfenozide per se, and is considered to be a adequate both for
data collection and for tolerance enforcement.
The method may be requested from: Chief, Analytical Chemistry
Branch, Environmental Science Center, 701 Mapes Rd., Ft. Meade, MD
20755-5350; telephone number: (410) 305-2905; e-mail address:
residuemethods@epa.gov.

B. International Residue Limits

There are no Codex, Canadian, or Mexican maximum residue levels
established for residues of methoxyfenozide in or on the subject crops.

V. Conclusion

Therefore, tolerances are established for residues of
methoxyfenozide, benzoic acid, 3-methoxy-2-methyl-, 2-(3,5-
dimethylbenzoyl)-2-(1,1-dimethylethyl) hydrazide, in or on cranberry at
0.5 ppm; okra at 2.0 ppm; pea, blackeyed, seed at 4.0 ppm; pea,
southern, seed at 4.0 ppm; turnip, greens at 30 ppm; and vegetable,
cucurbit, group 9 at 0.3 ppm.

VI. Objections and Hearing Requests

Under section 408(g) of the FFDCA, as amended by the FQPA, any
person may file an objection to any aspect of this regulation and may
also request a hearing on those objections. The EPA procedural
regulations which govern the submission of objections and requests for
hearings appear in 40 CFR part 178. Although the procedures in those
regulations require some modification to reflect the amendments made to
the FFDCA by the FQPA, EPA will continue to use those procedures, with
appropriate adjustments, until the necessary modifications can be made.
The new section 408(g) of the FFDCA provides essentially the same
process for persons to ``object'' to a regulation for an exemption from
the requirement of a tolerance issued by EPA under new section 408(d)
of FFDCA, as was provided in the old sections 408 and 409 of the FFDCA.
However, the period for filing objections is now 60 days, rather than
30 days.

A. What Do I Need to Do to File an Objection or Request a Hearing?

You must file your objection or request a hearing on this
regulation in accordance with the instructions provided in this unit
and in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must
identify docket ID number OPP-2003-0088 in the subject line on the
first page of your submission. All requests must be in writing, and
must be mailed or delivered to the Hearing Clerk on or before July 29,
2003.
1. Filing the request. Your objection must specify the specific
provisions in the regulation that you object to, and the grounds for
the objections (40 CFR 178.25). If a hearing is requested, the
objections must include a statement of the factual issues(s) on which a
hearing is requested, the requestor's contentions on such issues, and a
summary of any evidence relied upon by the objector (40 CFR 178.27).
Information submitted in connection with an objection or hearing
request may be claimed confidential by marking any part or all of that
information as CBI. Information so marked will not be disclosed except
in accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2. A copy of the
information that does not contain CBI must be submitted for inclusion
in the public record. Information not marked confidential may be
disclosed publicly by EPA without prior notice.
Mail your written request to: Office of the Hearing Clerk (1900C),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460-0001. You may also deliver your request to the
Office of the Hearing Clerk in Rm.104, Crystal Mall #2, 1921
Jefferson Davis Hwy., Arlington, VA. The Office of the Hearing Clerk is
open from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the Office of the Hearing Clerk is
(703) 603-0061.
2. Tolerance fee payment. If you file an objection or request a
hearing, you must also pay the fee prescribed by 40 CFR 180.33(i) or
request a waiver of that fee pursuant to 40 CFR 180.33(m). You must
mail the fee to: EPA Headquarters Accounting Operations Branch, Office
of Pesticide Programs, P.O. Box 360277M, Pittsburgh, PA 15251. Please
identify the fee submission by labeling it ``Tolerance Petition Fees.''
EPA is authorized to waive any fee requirement ``when in the
judgement of the Administrator such a waiver or refund is equitable and
not contrary to the purpose of this subsection.'' For additional
information regarding the waiver of these fees, you may contact James
Tompkins by phone at (703) 305-5697, by e-mail at tompkins.jim@epa.gov,
or by mailing a request for information to Mr. Tompkins at Registration
Division (7505C), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-
0001.
If you would like to request a waiver of the tolerance objection
fees, you must mail your request for such a waiver to: James Hollins,
Information Resources and Services Division (7502C), Office of
Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001.
3. Copies for the Docket. In addition to filing an objection or
hearing request with the Hearing Clerk as described in Unit VI.A., you
should also send a copy of your request to the PIRIB for its inclusion
in the official record that is described in Unit I.B.1. Mail your
copies, identified by docket ID number OPP-2003-0088, to: Public
Information and Records Integrity Branch, Information Resources and
Services Division (7502C), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-
0001. In person or by courier, bring a copy to the location of the
PIRIB described in Unit I.B.1. You may also send an electronic copy of
your request via e-mail to: opp-docket@epa.gov. Please use an ASCII
file format and avoid the use of special characters and any form of
encryption. Copies of electronic objections and hearing requests will
also be accepted on disks in WordPerfect 6.1/8.0 or ASCII file format.
Do not include any CBI in your electronic copy. You may also submit an
electronic copy of your request at many Federal Depository Libraries.

[[Page 32389]]

B. When Will the Agency Grant a Request for a Hearing?

A request for a hearing will be granted if the Administrator
determines that the material submitted shows the following: There is a
genuine and substantial issue of fact; there is a reasonable
possibility that available evidence identified by the requestor would,
if established resolve one or more of such issues in favor of the
requestor, taking into account uncontested claims or facts to the
contrary; and resolution of the factual issues(s) in the manner sought
by the requestor would be adequate to justify the action requested (40
CFR 178.32).

VII. Regulatory Assessment Requirements

This final rule establishes a tolerance under section 408(d) of the
FFDCA in response to a petition submitted to the Agency. The Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from
review under Executive Order 12866, entitled Regulatory Planning and
Review (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because this rule has been
exempted from review under Executive Order 12866 due to its lack of
significance, this rule is not subject to Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This final rule does
not contain any information collections subject to OMB approval under
the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., or impose
any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded mandate as described under
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Public Law
104-4). Nor does it require any special considerations under Executive
Order 12898, entitled Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice
in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations (59 FR 7629,
February 16, 1994); or OMB review or any Agency action under Executive
Order 13045, entitled Protection of Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997). This action does
not involve any technical standards that would require Agency
consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant to section
12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995
(NTTAA), Public Law 104-113, section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note). Since
tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis of a
petition under section 408(d) of the FFDCA, such as the tolerance in
this final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the
requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.) do not apply. In addition, the Agency has determined that this
action will not have a substantial direct effect on States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government, as specified in Executive Order 13132, entitled
Federalism(64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999). Executive Order 13132
requires EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure ``meaningful
and timely input by State and local officials in the development of
regulatory policies that have federalism implications.'' ``Policies
that have federalism implications'' is defined in the Executive Order
to include regulations that have ``substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government.'' This final rule directly regulates
growers, food processors, food handlers and food retailers, not States.
This action does not alter the relationships or distribution of power
and responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption
provisions of section 408(n)(4) of the FFDCA. For these same reasons,
the Agency has determined that this rule does not have any ``tribal
implications'' as described in Executive Order 13175, entitled
Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments (65 FR 67249,
November 6, 2000). Executive Order 13175, requires EPA to
develop an accountable process to ensure ``meaningful and timely input
by tribal officials in the development of regulatory policies that have
tribal implications.'' ``Policies that have tribal implications'' is
defined in the Executive Order to include regulations that have
``substantial direct effects on one or more Indian tribes, on the
relationship between the Federal Government and the Indian tribes, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.'' This rule will not have substantial
direct effects on tribal governments, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes,
as specified in Executive Order 13175. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does
not apply to this rule.

VIII. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General

The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of this final rule in the Federal Register. This final
rule is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180

Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.

Dated: May 20, 2003.
Richard P. Keigwin, Jr.,
Acting Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.

Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows:

PART 180--[AMENDED]

? 1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346(a) and 371.

? 2. Section 180.544 is amended by alphabetically adding commodities to
the table in paragraph (a) to read as follows:

Sec. 180.544 Methoxyfenozide; tolerances for residues.

(a) * * *

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commodity Parts per million
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
Cranberry...................................... 0.5
* * * * *
Okra........................................... 2.0

[[Page 32390]]

Pea, blackeyed, seed........................... 4.0
Pea, southern, seed............................ 4.0
* * * * *
Turnip, greens................................. 30
* * * * *
Vegetable, cucurbit, group 9................... 0.3
* * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 03-13563 Filed 5-29-03; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-S

Notices For
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
1994

Methoxyfenozide; Pesticide Tolerance

Local Navigation