Jump to main content.


Aspergillus flavus AF36 on Pistachio; Temporary Exemption From the Requirement of a Tolerance

Note: EPA no longer updates this information, but it may be useful as a reference or resource.




[Federal Register: May 23, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 99)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 28868-28871]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr23my07-13]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA-HQ-OPP-2007-0158; FRL-8129-4]

Aspergillus flavus AF36 on Pistachio; Temporary Exemption From
the Requirement of a Tolerance

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This regulation establishes a temporary exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance for residues of Aspergillus flavus AF36 on
pistachio when applied/used to reduce aflatoxin-producing Aspergillus
flavus. Interregional Research Project Number 4 (IR-4), Rutgers
University, 500 College Road East, Suite 201W, Princeton, NJ 08540 on
behalf of the Arizona Cotton Research and Protection Council], 3721
East Wier Avenue Phoenix, Arizona 85040-2933 submitted a petition to
EPA under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), as amended
by the Food Quality Protection Act of 1996 (FQPA), requesting the
temporary tolerance exemption. This regulation eliminates the need to
establish a maximum permissible level for residues of Aspergillus
flavus AF36. The temporary tolerance exemption expires on May 14, 2010.

DATES: This regulation is effective May 23, 2007. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received on or before June 22, 2007, and
must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR
part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2007-0158. To access the
electronic docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, select ``Advanced
Search,'' then ``Docket Search.'' Insert the docket ID number where
indicated and select the ``Submit'' button. Follow the instructions on
the regulations.gov web site to view the docket index or access
available documents. All documents in the docket are listed in the
docket index available in regulations.gov. Although listed in the
index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are
available in the electronic docket at http://www.regulations.gov, or,
if only available in hard copy, at the OPP Regulatory Public Docket in
Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South Bldg), 2777 S. Crystal Dr.,
Arlington, VA. The Docket Facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The Docket Facility
telephone number is (703) 305-5805.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shanaz Bacchus, Biopesticides and
Pollution Prevention Division (7511P), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number: (703) 308-8097; e-mail
address: bacchus.shanaz@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this Action Apply to Me?

    You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
Potentially affected entities may include, but are not limited to:
    • Crop production (NAICS code 111).
    • Animal production (NAICS code 112).
    • Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
    • Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).
    This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides
a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be

[[Page 28869]]

affected by this action. Other types of entities not listed in this
unit could also be affected. The North American Industrial
Classification System (NAICS) codes have been provided to assist you
and others in determining whether this action might apply to certain
entities. To determine whether you or your business may be affected by
this action, you should carefully examine the applicability provisions
in Section 5 of FIFRA and the regulations promulgated to carry out that
provision of FIFRA (40 CFR part 172). If you have any questions
regarding the applicability of this action to a particular entity,
consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

B. How Can I Access Electronic Copies of this Document?

    In addition to accessing an electronic copy of this Federal Register
document through the electronic docket at http://www.regulations.gov,
you may access this ``Federal Register'' document electronically through
the EPA Internet under the ``Federal Register'' listings at 
http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr. You may also access a frequently updated
electronic version of 40 CFR part 180 through the Government Printing
Office's pilot e-CFR site at http://www.gpoaccess.gov/ecfr.

C. Can I File an Objection or Hearing Request?

    Under section 408(g) of the FFDCA, as amended by the FQPA, any
person may file an objection to any aspect of this regulation and may
also request a hearing on those objections. The EPA procedural
regulations which govern the submission of objections and requests for
hearings appear in 40 CFR part 178. You must file your objection or
request a hearing on this regulation in accordance with the
instructions provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by
EPA, you must identify docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2007-0158 in the
subject line on the first page of your submission. All requests must be
in writing, and must be mailed or delivered to the Hearing Clerk on or
before July 23, 2007.
    In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the
Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of
the filing that does not contain any CBI for inclusion in the public
docket that is described in ADDRESSES. Information not marked
confidential pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA
without prior notice. Submit your copies, identified by docket ID
number EPA-HQ-OPP-2007-0158, by one of the following methods.
    • Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
    • Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory Public
Docket (7502P), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001.
    • Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public Docket (7502P),
Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South
Bldg), 2777 S. Crystal Dr, Arlington, VA. Deliveries are only accepted
during the Docket's normal hours of operation (8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays). Special arrangements
should be made for deliveries of boxed information. The Docket Facility
telephone number is (703) 305-5805.

II. Background and Statutory Findings

    In the Federal Register of March 21, 2007 (72 FR 13277) (FRL-8117-
4), EPA issued a notice pursuant to section 408(d)(3) of the FFDCA, 21
U.S.C. 346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a pesticide tolerance
petition (PP 6E7118) by Interregional Research Project Number 4 (IR-4),
Rutgers University, 500 College Road East, Suite 201W, Princeton, NJ
08540 on behalf of the Arizona Cotton Research and Protection Council,
3721 E. Wier Ave., Phoenix, AZ 85040-2933. The petition requested that
40 CFR part 180 be amended by establishing a temporary exemption from
the requirement of a tolerance for residues of Aspergillus flavus AF36
on pistachio. This notice included a summary of the petition prepared
by the petitioner IR-4, on behalf of the Arizona Cotton Research and
Protection Council. One comment received in response to the notice of
filing suggested that the area should be notified of the proposed
application of the pesticide. In this respect, a Federal Register
Notice of the receipt of the application for the Experimental Use
Permit was published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2007 (72 FR 
10751) (FRL-8117-6). Another announcement, regarding the filing of the
pesticide petition discussed herein, was published in the Federal
Register on March 21, 2007 (72 FR 13277) (FRL-8117-4).
    Section 408(c)(2)(A)(i) of the FFDCA allows EPA to establish an
exemption from the requirement for a tolerance (the legal limit for a
pesticide chemical residue in or on a food) only if EPA determines that
the exemption is ``safe.'' Section 408(c)(2)(A)(ii) of the FFDCA
defines ``safe '' to mean that ``there is a reasonable certainty that
no harm will result from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical
residue, including all anticipated dietary exposures and all other
exposures for which there is reliable information.'' This includes
exposure through drinking water and in residential settings, but does
not include occupational exposure. Pursuant to section 408(c)(2)(B), in
establishing or maintaining in effect an exemption from the requirement
of a tolerance, EPA must take into account the factors set forth in
section 408(b)(2)(C), which require EPA to give special consideration
to exposure of infants and children to the pesticide chemical residue
in establishing a tolerance and to ``ensure that there is a reasonable
certainty that no harm will result to infants and children from
aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue. * * *''
Additionally, section 408(b)(2)(D) of the FFDCA requires that the
Agency consider ``available information concerning the cumulative
effects of a particular pesticide's residues'' and ``other substances
that have a common mechanism of toxicity.''
    EPA performs a number of analyses to determine the risks from
aggregate exposure to pesticide residues. First, EPA determines the
toxicity of pesticides. Second, EPA examines exposure to the pesticide
through food, drinking water, and through other exposures that occur as
a result of pesticide use in residential settings.

III. Toxicological Profile

    Consistent with section 408(b)(2)(D) of the FFDCA, EPA has reviewed
the available scientific data and other relevant information in support
of this action and considered its validity, completeness and
reliability and the relationship of this information to human risk. EPA
has also considered available information concerning the variability of
the sensitivities of major identifiable subgroups of consumers,
including infants and children.
    The toxicological profile of the conditionally registered microbial
pesticide, Aspergillus flavus AF36 has been previously described in the
final rule of the Federal Register of July 14, 2003 (68 FR 41535) (FRL-
7311-6). The exemption from tolerance of Aspergillus flavus AF36, a
non-aflatoxin-producing strain of Aspergillus flavus, on cotton was
established in 40 CFR Sec. 180.1206. The database supporting that
exemption from tolerance also supports the proposed temporary exemption
of this active ingredient on pistachio. The pesticide was neither toxic
nor infective via the oral and pulmonary routes. It was placed in
Toxicity Category IV for acute oral effects. The Toxicity Category

[[Page 28870]]

III designation for acute inhalation effects is based on the granular
nature of the pesticide and the submitted pulmonary studies. This
pesticide has been used for more than a decade in experimental
laboratory and field trials and in agricultural practice on cotton in
Arizona, Texas and California without any reports of adverse dermal
irritation or hypersensitivity effects.
    The petitioner now seeks to amend that exemption from tolerance of
Aspergillus flavus AF36 on cotton, to include a temporary exemption
from tolerance for residues of the fungal active ingredient on
pistachio. An Experimental Use Permit, EPA Registration Number 71693-
EUP-1, is proposed for three years to treat 3,000 acre pistachio trees
per year by ground application. Treatment of a total of 9,000 acres
over three years in 2007, 2008, and 2009, will utilize a total of
approximately 0.72 pound of the active ingredient, Aspergillus flavus
AF36. No further toxicological data are required for this temporary
exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for Aspergillus flavus
AF36 on pistachio.

IV. Aggregate Exposures

    In examining aggregate exposure, section 408 of the FFDCA directs
EPA to consider available information concerning exposures from the
pesticide residue in food and all other non-occupational exposures,
including drinking water from ground water or surface water and
exposure through pesticide use in gardens, lawns, or buildings
(residential and other indoor uses).

A. Dietary Exposure

    1. Food. The aforesaid final rule for the exemption from tolerance
for residues of Aspergillus flavus AF 36 on cotton considered all
studies submitted by the applicant and found them to be acceptable.
Roasting of pistachio nuts and other post harvest agricultural
practices, such as treatment with phosphine, are expected to further
reduce any aflatoxin contamination of pistachio nuts.
    2. Drinking water exposure. Those data are also acceptable to
demonstrate that the proposed use of Aspergillus flavus AF36 on
pistachio will not harm the U.S adult, infant and children population
from dietary exposure, including food, and drinking water. Percolation
through the soil and municipal treatment of drinking water are expected
to preclude exposure of the U.S population, infants and children to
residues of the pesticide.

B. Other Non-Occupational Exposure

    1. Dermal exposure. Dermal non-occupational exposure is expected to
be minimal to non-existent for the proposed use of Aspergillus flavus
AF36 on pistachio. The pesticide is to be applied to agricultural sites
not in the proximity of residential areas, schools, nursing homes or
daycares.
    2. Inhalation exposure. For the same reasons non-occupational
inhalation exposure to AF36 is expected to be minimal to non-existent.

V. Cumulative Effects

    Another non-aflatoxin-producing strain of Aspergillus flavus, NRRL
21882 is registered, but not for use on pistachio. Cumulative effects
of these strains are not expected to exceed the risk cup for the
registered Aspergillus flavus strains, AF36 and NRRL 21882.
Furthermore, these strains are expected to decrease the presence of
aflatoxin-producing colonies of the fungus on treated commodities and
thus decrease the risks posed by the potent liver carcinogen, aflatoxin.

VI. Determination of Safety for U.S. Population, Infants and Children

    Based on the previously evaluated data, it is not necessary to use
a safety factor to determine safety to children 9 (see Federal
Register, July 14, 2003, as cited in Unit III.)

VII. Other Considerations

A. Endocrine Disruptors

    See Federal Register, July 14, 2003, cited in Unit III.

B. Analytical Method(s)

    See Federal Register, July 14, 2003, cited in Unit III.

C. Codex Maximum Residue Level

    There is no Codex Maximum Residue Level (MRL) for residues of
Aspergillus flavus AF36 on pistachio.

VIII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    This final rule establishes a tolerance under section 408(d) of
FFDCA in response to a petition submitted to the Agency. The Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from
review under Executive Order 12866, entitled Regulatory Planning and
Review (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because this rule has been
exempted from review under Executive Order 12866, this rule is not
subject to Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355,
May 22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045, entitled Protection of Children
from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks (62 FR 19885, April
23, 1997). This final rule does not contain any information collections
subject to OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq., nor does it require any special considerations
under Executive Order 12898, entitled Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis
of a petition under section 408(d) of FFDCA, such as the tolerance in
this final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the
requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.) do not apply.
    This final rule directly regulates growers, food processors, food
handlers and food retailers, not States or tribes, nor does this action
alter the relationships or distribution of power and responsibilities
established by Congress in the preemption provisions of section
408(n)(4) of FFDCA. As such, the Agency has determined that this action
will not have a substantial direct effect on States or tribal
governments, on the relationship between the national government and
the States or tribal governments, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government or between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes. Thus, the Agency has determined
that Executive Order 13132, entitled Federalism (64 FR 43255, August
10, 1999) and Executive Order 13175, entitled Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments (59 FR 22951, November 6,
2000) do not apply to this rule. In addition, This rule does not impose
any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded mandate as described under
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Pub. L. 104-4).
    This action does not involve any technical standards that would
require Agency consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant
to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (NTTAA), Pub. L. 104-113, section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).

IX. Congressional Review Act

    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report to each House of the Congress and to
the Comptroller

[[Page 28871]]

General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this
rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House
of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States
prior to publication of this final rule in the Federal Register. This
final rule is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: May 14, 2007.
Janet L. Andersen,
Director, Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division, Office of
Pesticide Programs.

• Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows:

PART 180--[AMENDED]

• 1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.

• 2. Section 180.1206 is amended by designating the existing text as
paragraph (a) and by adding paragraph (b) to read as follows:

Sec.  180.1206  Aspergillus flavus AF36 on pistachio; exemption from
the requirement of a tolerance.

    (a) * * *
    (b) Apergillus flavus AF36 is temporarily exempt from the
requirement of a tolerance on pistachio when used in accordance with
the Experimental Use Permit 71693-EUP-1. This temporary exemption from
tolerance will expire on May 14, 2010.

[FR Doc. E7-9729 Filed 5-22-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-S

 
 


Local Navigation


Jump to main content.