Testing Consent Order and Export Notification Requirements for Diethanolamine

Note: EPA no longer updates this information, but it may be useful as a reference or resource.

[Federal Register: March 30, 1998 (Volume 63, Number 60)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 15128-15130]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr30mr98-37]

[[Page 15128]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 799

[OPPTS-42203A; FRL-5769-7]
RIN 2070-AC76

Testing Consent Order and Export Notification Requirements for
Diethanolamine

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On June 26, 1996, EPA proposed a test rule under section 4(a)
of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) to require manufacturers and
processors of 21 hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) to test these
substances for certain health effects. Included as one of these
chemical substances was diethanolamine (CAS No. 111-42-2). EPA invited
the submission of proposals for enforceable consent agreements (ECAs)
for pharmacokinetics testing of the HAPs chemicals and received a
proposal for testing diethanolamine from the Chemical Manufacturers
Association, Alkanolamines Panel (CMA Alkanolamines Panel). In a
previous document EPA solicited interested parties to monitor or
participate in negotiations on an ECA for diethanolamine. EPA is
proposing that if an ECA is successfully concluded for diethanolamine,
then the subsequent publication of the TSCA section 4 testing consent
order (Order) in the Federal Register would add diethanolamine to the
table of testing consent orders for substances and mixtures with
Chemical Abstract Service Registry Numbers. As a result of the proposed
addition of diethanolamine, all exporters of diethanolamine, including
persons who do not sign the ECA, would be subject to export
notification requirements under section 12(b) of TSCA.

DATES: Written comments on this proposed rule must be received on or
before May 29, 1998.
ADDRESSES: Each comment must bear the docket control number, OPPTS-
42203A. All comments should be sent in triplicate to: OPPT Document
Control Officer (7407), Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics,
Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW., Rm. G-99, East Tower,
Washington, DC 20460.
Comments and data may also be submitted electronically to:
oppt.ncic@epamail.epa.gov. following the instructions under Unit IV. of
this preamble. No Confidential Business Information (CBI) should be
submitted through e-mail.
All comments which contain information claimed as CBI must be
clearly marked as such. Three sanitized copies of any comments
containing information claimed as CBI must also be submitted and will
be placed in the public record for this document. Persons submitting
information on any portion of which they believe is entitled to
treatment as CBI by EPA must assert a business confidentiality claim in
accordance with 40 CFR 2.203(b) for each such portion. This claim must
be made at the time that the information is submitted to EPA. If a
submitter does not assert a confidentiality claim at the time of
submission, EPA will make the information available to the public
without further notice to the submitter.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For additional information: Susan B.
Hazen, Director, Environmental Assistance Division (7408), Rm. ET-543B,
Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, Environmental Protection
Agency, 401 M St., SW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone: (202) 554-
1404, TDD: (202) 554-0551; e-mail address: TSCA-
Hotline@epamail.epa.gov.
For technical information: Richard W. Leukroth, Jr., Project
Manager, Chemical Information and Testing Branch (7405), Office of
Pollution Prevention and Toxics, Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M
St., SW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone: (202) 260-0321; e-mail
address: leukroth.rich@epamail.epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Electronic Availability

Internet: Electronic copies of this document and various support
documents are available from the EPA Home Page at the Federal
Register--Environmental Documents entry for this document under ``Laws
and Regulations'' (http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-TOX/1998/).

II. Development of Enforceable Consent Agreement for Diethanolamine

Diethanolamine is one of the chemicals proposed for health effects
testing in a proposed HAPs test rule under section 4(a) of TSCA in the
Federal Register of June 26, 1996 (61 FR 33178) (FRL-4869-1). The
proposed HAPs test rule was amended on December 24, 1997 (62 FR 67466)
(FRL-5742-2). In the proposed HAPs test rule, EPA invited the
submission of proposals for pharmacokinetics (PK) testing for the
chemicals included in the proposed HAPs test rule. These proposals
could provide the basis for negotiation of ECAs, which, if successfully
concluded, would be incorporated into Orders. The PK studies would be
used to conduct route-to-route extrapolation of toxicity data from
routes other than inhalation to predict the effects of inhalation
exposure, as an alternative to testing proposed under the HAPs test
rule. A proposal for PK testing for diethanolamine was submitted by the
CMA Alkanolamines Panel to EPA on November 25, 1996. The Agency
reviewed this alternative testing proposal and prepared a preliminary
technical analysis of the proposal which it sent to the CMA
Alkanolamines Panel Panel on November 21, 1997. The CMA Alkanolamines
Panel Panel responded on December 31, 1997 that it has a continued
interest in pursuing the ECA process for diethanolamine. EPA has
decided to proceed with the ECA process for diethanolamine. EPA has
published a document soliciting interested parties to monitor or
participate in negotiations on an ECA for PK testing of diethanolamine
(63 FR 3109, January 21, 1998) (FRL-5766-7). The procedures for ECA
negotiations are described at 40 CFR 790.22(b).
If the ECA for diethanolamine is successfully concluded, and an
Order is published in the Federal Register, testing to develop needed
data would be required of those persons that have signed the agreement.
Section 12(b) of TSCA provides that if any person exports or intends to
export to a foreign country a chemical substance or mixture for which
the submission of data is required under section 4 of TSCA, that person
shall notify EPA of this export or intent to export. This requirement
applies to data obtained from either a test rule or an ECA and Order
under the authority of section 4 of TSCA. EPA intends the ECA to
include the export notification requirements of section 12(b) of TSCA,
codified at 40 CFR part 707, subpart D.

III. Publication of Testing Consent Order

EPA is proposing that if an ECA is successfully concluded for
diethanolamine, the publication of the Order in the Federal Register
would add diethanolamine to the table in 40 CFR 799.5000, Testing
consent orders for substances and mixtures with Chemical Abstract
Service Registry Numbers.
Exporters of chemicals listed at 40 CFR 799.5000 are required
under 40 CFR 799.19, Chemical imports and exports, to comply with the
export notification requirements of 40 CFR part 707, subpart D. This
proposed rule,

[[Page 15129]]

when finalized, would amend Sec. 799.5000, and, in accordance with 40
CFR 799.19, all exporters of diethanolamine, including persons who do
not sign the ECA, would be subject to export notification requirements
under 40 CFR part 707, subpart D.
Under 40 CFR 707.65(a)(2)(ii), a person who exports or intends to
export for the first time to a particular foreign country a chemical
subject to TSCA section 4 data requirements must submit a one-time
notice to EPA identifying the chemical and country of import. A single
notice can cover multiple chemicals and multiple countries. If
additional importing countries are subsequently added, additional
export notices must be submitted to EPA. Other procedures for
submitting export notifications to EPA are described in 40 CFR 707.65.
Under 40 CFR 707.67, the contents of the export notification from
the exporter or intended exporter to EPA shall include:
1. The name of the chemical (i.e., in this case, diethanolamine).
2. The name and address of the exporter.
3. The country(ies) of import.
4. The date(s) of export or intended export.
5. The section of TSCA under which EPA has taken action (i.e., in
this case, section 4 of TSCA).
Following receipt of the section 12(b) notification from the exporter
or intended exporter, under 40 CFR 707.70, EPA will provide notice of
the export or intended export to the affected foreign government(s).

IV. Public Record and Electronic Submissions

The official record for this rulemaking (including comments and
data submitted electronically as described below), including the public
version, that does not include any information claimed as CBI, has been
established for this rulemaking under docket control number OPPTS-
42203A. The official record for this document also includes all
material and submissions filed under docket control number [OPPTS-
42187A; FRL-4869-1], the record for the proposed HAPs test rule, as
amended, and all materials and submissions filed under docket control
number [OPPTS-42187B; FRL-4869-1], the record for the receipt of
alternative testing proposals for developing ECAs for HAPs chemicals.
The public version of this record is available for inspection from 12
noon to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The
public record is located in the TSCA Nonconfidential Information
Center, Rm. NE B-607, 401 M St., SW., Washington, DC 20460.
Electronic comments can be sent directly to EPA at:
oppt.ncic@epamail.epa.gov.

Electronic comments must be submitted as an ASCII file avoiding
the use of special characters and any form of encryption. Comments and
data will also be accepted on disks in WordPerfect 5.1/6.1 or ASCII
file format. All comments and data in electronic form must be
identified by the docket control number, OPPTS-42203A. Electronic
comments on this proposed rule may be filed online at many Federal
Depository Libraries.

V. Regulatory Assessment Requirements

A. Regulatory Flexibility Act

Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., EPA
does not believe that the impacts of this proposed rule constitute a
significant economic impact on small entities.
Export regulations promulgated pursuant to section 12(b) of TSCA--
40 CFR part 707, subpart D--require only a one-time notification to
each foreign country of export for each chemical for which data are
required under section 4 of TSCA. In an analysis of the economic
impacts of the July 27, 1993, amendment to the rules implementing
section 12(b) of TSCA (58 FR 40238), EPA estimated that the one-time
cost of preparing and submitting the TSCA section 12(b) notification
was $62.60. See U.S. EPA, ``Economic Analysis in Support of the Final
Rule to Amend Rule Promulgated Under TSCA Section 12(b),'' OPPT/ETD/
RIB, June 1992, contained in the record for this rulemaking, and
referenced in the amended proposed HAPs test rule (62 FR 67466,
December 24, 1997). Inflated through the last quarter of 1996 using the
Consumer Price Index, the current cost is estimated to be $69.56.
Although data available to EPA regarding export shipments of the HAPs
chemicals are limited, a small exporter would have to have annual
revenues below $6,956 per chemical/country combination in order to be
impacted at a 1% or greater level. For example, a small exporter filing
3 notifications per year would have to have annual sales revenues below
$20,868 (3 x $6,956) in order to be classified as impacted at the
greater than 1% level. EPA believes that it is reasonable to assume
that few, if any, small exporters would file sufficient export
notifications to be impacted at or above the 1% level. Based on this,
the export notification requirements triggered by the ECA for
diethanolamine would be unlikely to have a significant economic impact
on small exporters. Because EPA has concluded that there is no
significant impact on small exporters, the Agency does not need to
determine the number or size of the entities that would be impacted at
a 1% or greater level.
Therefore, the Agency certifies that this proposed rule, if
finalized, would not have a significant economic impact on small
entities.

B. Executive Order 12866; Executive Order 12898; Executive Order 13045

Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
proposed rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). It does not
involve special considerations of environmental-justice related issues
as required by Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994),
nor raise any issues regarding children's environmental-health risks
under Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 1985, April 23, 1997) because the
Executive Order does not apply to actions expected to have an economic
impact of less than $100 million.

C. Paperwork Reduction Act

An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, an information collection request unless it displays a
currently valid control number assigned by OMB. The OMB control numbers
for EPA's regulations are listed in 40 CFR part 9. The information
collection requirements related to this action have already been
approved by OMB pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq., under OMB control number 2070-0030 (EPA ICR No. 0795). The
public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated
to average 0.55 hour per response.

D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA), Pub.
L. 104-4, establishes requirements for Federal agencies to assess the
effects of certain regulatory actions on State, local, and tribal
governments and the private sector, and to seek input from State,
local, and tribal governments on certain regulatory actions. EPA has
determined that this action does not contain a Federal mandate that may
result in expenditures of $100 million or more for State, local, and
tribal governments, in the aggregate, or the private sector in any 1
year. Therefore, this action is not subject to the requirements of
sections 202 and 205 of UMRA. The requirements of sections

[[Page 15130]]

203 and 204 of UMRA which relate to regulatory requirements that might
significantly or uniquely affect small governments and to regulatory
proposals that contain a significant Federal intergovernmental mandate,
respectively, also do not apply to this proposed rule because the rule
would only affect the private sector, i.e., those companies that test
chemicals.

E. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act

This proposed regulatory action does not involve any technical
standards that would require Agency consideration of voluntary
consensus standards pursuant to section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (NTTAA), Pub. L. 104-
113, section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note). Section 12(d) directs EPA to
use voluntary consensus standards in its regulatory activities unless
to do so would be inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise
impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical standards
(e.g., materials specifications, test methods, sampling procedures,
business practices, etc.) that are developed or adopted by voluntary
consensus standards bodies. The NTTAA requires EPA to provide Congress,
through OMB, explanations when the Agency decides not to use available
and applicable voluntary consensus standards. EPA invites public
comment on this conclusion.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 799

Environmental protection, Chemicals, Exports, Hazardous
substances, Health, Laboratories, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.

Dated: March 13, 1998.

Lynn R. Goldman,

Assistant Administrator for Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic
Substances.
Therefore, it is proposed that 40 CFR chapter I be amended as
follows:

PART 799--[AMENDED]

1. The authority citation for part 799 would continue to read as
follows:

Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2603, 2611, 2625.

2. Section 799.5000 is amended by adding diethanolamine to the
table in CAS number order to read as follows:

Sec. 799.5000 Testing consent orders for substances and mixtures with
Chemical Abstract Service Registry Numbers.

* * * * *

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Substance or mixture
CAS number name Testing FR publication date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *
* *
111-42-2 Diethanolamine......... Health effects......... [insert date for final
rule.]

* * * * *
* *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *

[FR Doc. 98-8211 Filed 3-27-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-F

Notices For
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
1994

Testing Consent Order and Export Notification Requirements for Diethanolamine

Local Navigation