Targeted Watersheds Grant Program: Call for Nominations

Note: EPA no longer updates this information, but it may be useful as a reference or resource.

[Federal Register: February 18, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 33)]
[Notices]
[Page 8364-8372]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr18fe05-72]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[FRL-7874-4]

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA today is announcing the Call for Nominations of watershed
proposals under the Targeted

[[Page 8365]]

Watersheds Grant Program. Formerly called the Watershed Initiative, the
Targeted Watersheds Grant Program is a competitive grant program
designed to support the protection and restoration of the country's
water resources through a holistic watershed approach to water quality
management. For fiscal year 2005, Congress has appropriated a total of
$18 million for the Program of which $10 million will be directed to
nation-wide projects for improving water quality and the remaining $8
million will be directed toward projects in the Chesapeake Bay
watershed. Today's notice sets forth the process that will be used for
selecting watersheds for the nation-wide projects, and serves as the
call for nominations from Governors and Tribal Leaders. Subsequently,
EPA will publish a separate notice that will outline the criteria and
selection process for Chesapeake Bay nominations.

DATES: The deadline for EPA receipt of nominations, both in hard copy
and in electronic form, is May 19, 2005. Nominations and supporting
materials received after this deadline will not be considered.

ADDRESSES: Two hard copies of the nomination packages must be submitted
in their entirety by express mail or courier service. Deliver one copy
to Carol Peterson, Office of Wetlands, Oceans, and Watersheds, USEPA,
Room 7136E, 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20004;
telephone 202-566-1304. The other copy is to be delivered to the
appropriate EPA Regional office (see section IV.E for regional names
and addresses). Please mark all submissions ATTN: Targeted Watersheds.
In addition to the hard copies, a portion of the nomination package
must also be submitted electronically to the e-mail address provided;
the subject line should read ``STATE--WATERSHED NAME.'' Please follow
the detailed instructions provided in section IV.D of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carol Peterson, USEPA, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., (4501T), Washington, DC, 20460; telephone: 202-
566-1304; e-mail: initiative.watershed@epa.gov or one of the Regional
contacts listed in section VII of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below. Additional information, forms, and any updated guidance will be
posted on EPA's Targeted Watersheds Web site at
http://www.epa.gov/owow/watershed/initiative.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Funding Opportunity Description

A. The Targeted Watersheds Grant Program

The Targeted Watersheds Grant Program is built on the fundamental
concept of managing water resource use and water quality on a holistic
watershed basis. The watershed approach focuses regional and State
efforts to integrate water and source water protection programs to
support locally-led collaborative efforts within hydrologically defined
boundaries that protect and restore our aquatic resources and
ecosystems. This approach offers an efficient opportunity to tackle
today's environmental challenges. The Targeted Watersheds Grant Program
encourages watershed practitioners to examine water-related problems in
the context of the larger watershed in which they exist, to develop
solutions to those problems by creatively applying the full array of
available tools, including Federal, State, and local programs, and to
restore and preserve water resources through strategic planning and
implementation that draw in public and private sector partners. Both
the watershed approach and the Targeted Watersheds Grant Program focus
on multi-faceted plans for protecting and restoring water resources
that are developed using partnership efforts of diverse stakeholders.
Projects selected for funding will go beyond implementing separate,
detached activities and will focus on implementing and measuring the
effectiveness of an integrated watershed-based approach to conservation
and restoration throughout a watershed. Successful nominees will focus
on far-reaching approaches that will improve water quality and are
consistent with the goals of the Clean Water Act.

B. Goals for 2005

In this third year of the program, EPA will continue to support
coalition-based strategies for improving water resources on a watershed
level, including activities such as attaining water quality standards,
and protecting and restoring the natural and beneficial uses of
floodplains. The goal of the Targeted Watersheds Grant Program is to
advance successful partnerships and coalitions that have completed the
necessary watershed assessments and have a technically sound watershed
plan ready to carry out. This Program is intended to encourage the kind
of pro-active, and incentive-based protection and restoration measures
that will yield cleaner water and better protected ecosystems.
EPA will select projects that are intended to improve water quality
and are based on the fundamentals of the Clean Water Act, that is,
projects that relate to the prevention, reduction, and elimination of
water pollution. The Agency will continue to base its selections on
projects that exhibit a high degree of innovation, measurable results,
partnerships, outreach and cost-effectiveness. In addition, special
emphasis this year will be placed on water quality trading projects. To
encourage States, interstate agencies, and tribes to develop and
implement water quality trading programs for nutrients, sediments, and
other pollutants, EPA will reserve about fifteen percent of the
Targeted Watersheds grant funds for promising trading projects that
meet the prescribed criteria. While trading projects may take longer to
develop and implement due to necessary front-end tasks such as
establishing a market framework and identifying applicable trading
ratios, EPA is interested in funding trading projects that will result
in reduced pollutant loadings in the near to mid-term. Thus, more
specific criteria related to trading is provided in this year's
solicitation (see section V.A). Examples of trading proposals with
these characteristics can be found on the Targeted Watersheds Grant
Program Web site at http://www.epa.gov/owow/watershed/initiative/2004/
04proposals.html under Passiac River, NJ and Cape Fear River, NC. EPA's
Water Quality Trading Policy and other relevant information can be
found at http://www.epa.gov/owow/watershed/trading/.

II. Award Information

Approximately $10 million will be available to support nation-wide
projects of which fifteen percent will be reserved for trading
projects. Funding also will be continued to existing grants that work
toward providing services, such as, national tools, training, and
technical assistance to all watershed organizations.
EPA anticipates that typical grant awards for the selected
watersheds will range from $600,000 to $900,000 depending on the amount
requested and the overall size and need of the project. It is important
to note that, even if selected to receive a grant, full funding of a
proposal is not guaranteed, and EPA reserves the right to make partial
awards. For example, the Agency may choose not to fund one particular
aspect of the proposal or may choose to decrease a requested award by a
certain percentage. EPA also reserves the right

[[Page 8366]]

to reject all proposals and make no awards.

III. Eligibility Information

A. Authority

For FY 2005, EPA has been granted independent authority for the
Targeted Watersheds Grant Program. This authority is contained in the
Consolidated Appropriations (Omnibus Bill), Public Law 108-447. The new
authority allows EPA to tailor the scope of the Targeted Watersheds
Grant Program to better align with the goals of the Clean Water Act of
fishable, swimmable waters, and the objectives of the Agency's
strategic plan to protect the environment and safeguard human health.
This clears the way for EPA to fund a broader range of projects and
allows the Agency to fund projects that directly entail environmental
protection and/or restoration activities, most specifically, on-the-
ground implementation projects.
Regulations pertaining to EPA grants and other assistance
agreements are in Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)
parts, 30, 31, and 40. All costs incurred under this program must be
allowable under the applicable OMB Cost Circulars: A-87 (States and
local governments), A-122 (nonprofit organizations), or A-21
(universities). Copies of these circulars can be found at http://
www.whitehouse.gov/omb/circulars/. In accordance with EPA policy
and the OMB circulars, as appropriate, any recipient of funding must agree
not to use assistance funds for lobbying, fund-raising, or political
activities (e.g., lobbying members of Congress or lobbying for other
Federal grants, cooperative agreements, or contracts).

B. Eligible Applicants

Any governmental or nonprofit non-governmental entity is eligible
to receive a grant under the Targeted Watersheds Grant Program.
Recipients can include: States and tribes, public water pollution
control agencies; interstate or inter-tribal agencies; public or non-
profit private agencies, institutions, or organizations; and
individuals. All non-profit watershed organizations are eligible and
are encouraged to submit a nomination. Watershed organizations that
were selected for funding in 2003 or 2004 are not eligible. For-profit
commercial entities are ineligible for funding but are strongly
encouraged to be active partners. The term ``State'' is defined to
include the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, U.S. Virgin Islands,
Guam, American Samoa, and the Northern Mariana Islands (40 CFR 31.3).
Interjurisdictional watershed partnerships, that is, those that
encompass abutting areas and, thus, neighboring political authorities,
or that transcend international boundaries, are encouraged. Watershed
nominations that encompass more than one governmental authority will be
considered interjurisdictional, provided that the appropriate water
agency in the adjacent jurisdiction is a partner or otherwise supports
the project(s).

C. Eligible Activities

EPA will consider any activity, apart from those listed below, that
will result in the protection, preservation, and restoration of a
watershed, that incorporates a watershed-based approach, and meets the
prescribed criteria, e.g, is well developed and will produce measurable
environmental outcomes. Activities proposed for funding are not
necessarily expected to address the entire watershed, but are expected
to have been developed based on a comprehensive assessment and plan for
the watershed. As such, all activities must directly support the
described watershed plan, and Targeted Watersheds Grant funds must be
used in accordance with the plan. Examples of selected proposals and
funded activities from 2003 and 2004 can be found on the Web site at
http://www.epa.gov/owow/watershed/initiative/2003/ and
http://www.epa.gov/owow/watershed/initiative/2004/, respectively.
EPA has chosen to declare certain activities ineligible for
funding. These include any proposals to directly support activities
required under the Clean Water Act. This entails funds for the
development of Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs), and Office of Water
regulatory programs including Phase II Stormwater projects. Proposals
implementing the non-regulatory component of TMDLs, e.g. the elements
of a watershed plan that address non-point pollution, however, are
eligible. The construction of buildings or other major structures, or
the purchase of major equipment or machinery, also will not be funded
under this Program. Proposals containing subgrant programs (also called
pass-through grants) are allowed, but the subgrant portion must account
for no more than 20% of the requested funding amount.

D. Cost Sharing/Matching Requirements

EPA is requiring applicants to demonstrate a minimum non-Federal
match of 25% of the total cost of the project or projects. This means
EPA will fund a maximum of 75% of the total project cost. EPA
encourages applicants to leverage as much investment as possible. In
addition to cash, matching funds can come from in-kind goods and
services, such as the use of volunteers and their donated time,
equipment, expertise, etc., consistent with the regulations governing
matching fund requirements (40 CFR 31.24 or 40 CFR 30.23). Federal
funds may not be used to meet the match requirement for this grant
program unless authorized by the statute governing their use.
Tribes and Tribal watershed groups may be exempt from this match
requirement if they are constrained to such an extent that fulfilling
the match requirement would impose undue hardship. Tribes wishing to be
exempt from the minimum 25% match requirement must submit a one-page
written request with justification. Exemption requests should be sent
directly to the EPA Headquarters contact listed in section VII, forty-
five (45) days prior to the nomination deadline. If approved, the
nomination will be scored as if it meets the minimum 25% match.

IV. Application and Submission Information

EPA will select watersheds and will award the grants through a
national competition. Nominations will be selected based on the quality
of the written materials received and adherence to the selection
criteria and goals of the Targeted Watersheds Grant Program. Emphasis
will be placed on those proposed projects with clear objectives,
measurable environmental indicators, and an executable monitoring plan.
Funding decisions will be made based on the evaluation criteria
outlined in section V.A of this notice. EPA will invite only those
nominees whose proposals are selected under this Program to submit
formal grant applications (section VI).

A. Nomination Process

Watersheds must be nominated by Governors or Tribal Leaders. (For
the purposes of this notice, a tribal nomination may be submitted by an
elected Tribal Official.) Each Governor or Tribal Leader may prepare or
solicit watershed proposals from eligible entities in a manner most
appropriate to their State or tribe, and nominate the most meritorious
to EPA.
A Governor or Tribal Leader may nominate up to two watersheds, each
of which is wholly within its boundaries, plus an unlimited number of
interjurisdictional watersheds, i.e., those that encompass several
States, Tribes or countries. For

[[Page 8367]]

interjurisdictional watersheds, any of the engaged Governors/Tribal
Leaders may submit the nomination. Such watershed nominations must
include an official endorsement of all partnering States or Tribes in
their nomination package. Governors and Tribal Leaders are to submit
their watershed nominations to EPA.

B. Content and Form of Nomination Package

In preparing nomination materials, nominees should focus on the
overarching goal by which their overall nomination will be judged, i.e,
how the proposed projects are interrelated to benefit the whole
watershed. Within the required components outlined below, nominees
should address completely and to the best of their ability, the
criteria the Agency will be using in its evaluation as outlined in
section V.A below.
Each nomination package must contain the components listed in this
section. Failure to submit any of this information ultimately will
result in disqualification and removal from the selection process.
Conversely, additional, unsolicited material is strongly discouraged
and any such material submitted will not be reviewed.
1. Nomination Letter. A letter signed by the Governor or Tribal
Leader formally nominating the watershed for consideration for funding
must accompany each nomination package.
2. Title Page. The title page must indicate: (1) The name of the
watershed along with the designated 8-digit Hydrological Unit Code(s)
(HUCs); (2) if applicable, the impaired waters, such as any degraded
stream segments within the project area that are on the State's 303(d)
list; (3) nominee contact information, i.e., name, affiliation,
address, telephone, and e-mail of the person with whom the Agency
should correspond; and (4) Internet Web site (i.e., URL) of the
organization if available. HUCs (also known as USGS Cataloging Units)
and State 303(d) listings can be found on EPA's Surf Your Watershed Web
site at http://www.epa.gov/surf/locate/index.cfm.
3. Abstract. A 150-word or less summary of the nomination.
4. Project Description. The narrative description of the proposed
activities is limited to a total of ten, double-spaced pages in which
the following components are addressed. The page numbers shown in
parentheses for each component listed below are suggested lengths only,
and nominees may adjust their project description within the 10-page
limit in a manner that best fits their needs.
(a) Introduction (2 pages).
Characterize the watershed, including any wetlands, and overall
watershed planning efforts. Describe what efforts have been undertaken
to improve watershed health, next steps, and future plans. An
assessment of the natural resource and environmental conditions, and an
identification of problem sources and areas for treatment are required.
These include:
(1) A description of the watershed's biological, physical, and, if
relevant, socio-economic and/or cultural characteristics.
(2) An identification and prioritization of the threats and
impairments facing the watershed, focusing on those that will be
addressed by the proposal.
(3) An overall description of the watershed plan including short-
and long-term watershed goals.
(4) An identification of the assessments and plans that have been
completed to date.
(b) Description of the Proposed Projects (7 pages).
Describe the projects to be funded under the Targeted Watersheds
Grant Program. These should be described in terms of activities that
will meet the stated objectives and yield positive environmental
outcomes. The following information must be included:
(1) Describe how the project(s) will improve the identified
impairments or stream conditions. Explain how the projects fit together
and are interrelated to benefit and affect watershed health.
(2) Describe in detail each project (if more than one) including:
(i) A description of the components and goals of the project(s), (ii) a
schedule for implementing the project(s); (iii) a summary of the costs
of the project(s) with reference to the appended itemized budget for
details; and (iv) milestones and dates for determining whether or not
the intended goals of the watershed project(s) are being realized.
(3) Describe the monitoring and evaluation component along with
identified environmental indicators. Attention should be given to
additional pre-project baseline data requirements. This component must
include performance measures and progress goals, as well as a
description of how the ultimate success of the projects will be
measured. Performance measures must be environmental (e.g., chemical or
microbial levels attained). Other measures to be monitored should be
infrastructural (e.g., additional partnerships formed) and
implementational (e.g., on-the-ground work performed). The progress and
performance of the projects must be measurable by technically sound
practices.
(4) Include a description of expected environmental outcomes.
Describe the method to measure the environmental improvement that is
expected to result from the project(s) and describe how the project(s)
will be evaluated. Criteria by which the project(s) will be judged and
by which the project will be considered successful should be
incorporated into the description.
(5) Describe how the projects complement or are consistent with
other EPA, Federal, and/or State programs or mandates. Other Federal
contributors or supporting partners should also be identified.
(c) Description of Outreach Activities (1 page).
Describe the information and outreach plan that will be used to
enhance public understanding of the watershed and encourage
participation in the local project or projects, and future activities
regarding implementing the goals of the watershed plan. Because the
selected watersheds are intended to serve as models for other
communities, describe the outreach plan and how it will transfer the
knowledge gained from this effort to other areas and organizations.
5. Budget. Provide a detailed breakdown of cost by category for
each project.
(a) Standard Budget Form. To facilitate the compilation and review
of financial information, the Agency is providing a standard form for
potential applicants to use when submitting project budgets. This form
(Table 1) may be reconstructed or downloaded from the Targeted
Watersheds Web site at http://www.epa.gov/owow/watershed/initiative/
budget.form. All budget information, including grant administration
costs, matching funds and other leveraged services, and travel cost to
the annual conference, must be provided on this form. (Information on
matching funds and the annual conference is described in subsections
(b) and (c) below). Nominees should include cost estimates for each of
the proposed project activities to be conducted under the grant. Due to
the increase in grant management requirements, EPA suggests that
nominees budget up to 15% of the total project costs for administrative
purposes.
Explanations of the costs associated with each entry should be
included in the narrative portion of the nomination package.

[[Page 8368]]

Table 1.--Budget Information--EPA Targeted Watersheds Grant Program \1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Watershed Project, Activity or Work
Plan Element Federal Non-Federal Total
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SECTION A--BUDGET SUMMARY
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. $ $ $
2. ........................ ....................... .......................
3. ........................ ....................... .......................
4. ........................ ....................... .......................
---------------------------
Totals.......................... $ $ $
\1\ Excerpted from Standard Form 424A, OMB Circular A-102.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Watershed Project, Activity or Work Plan Element
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total
Budget Categories (1) (2) (3) (4)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SECTION B--BUDGET CATEGORIES
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
a. Personnel $ $ $ $ $
b. Fringe Benefits ...................... ...................... ...................... ..................... .....................
c. Travel ...................... ...................... ...................... ..................... .....................
d. Equipment ...................... ...................... ...................... ..................... .....................
e. Supplies ...................... ...................... ...................... ..................... .....................
f. Contractual ...................... ...................... ...................... ..................... .....................
g. Construction ...................... ...................... ...................... ..................... .....................
h. Other ...................... ...................... ...................... ..................... .....................
i. Total Direct Charges (sum line ...................... ...................... ...................... ..................... .....................
a-h)
j. Indirect Charges ...................... ...................... ...................... ..................... .....................
-------------------------
Totals (sum line i-j)......... $ $ $ $ $
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(b) Matching Requirement. Applicants must demonstrate a minimum
non-Federal match of 25% of the total cost of the project or projects.
This means EPA will fund a maximum of 75% of the total project cost. To
determine if the minimum match is met, the following formulas may be
helpful:

amount ($) requested from EPA x 100 < = 75 or

cost ($) of entire project

amount ($) requested from EPA = minimum match ($)

For example, a $1.2M grant could be used to support a $1.6M project
proposal. Another way of looking at this is if the nominee requests
$1M, it must be able to provide $333,334.00 in matching funds or
services. In this example, the total cost of the proposal would be just
under $1.34M. Please contact your Regional contact person listed in
section VII if you have any questions about calculating the match
requirement.
(c) Annual Conference. Watershed organizations selected for grant
funding will be required to attend the annual three-day National
Targeted Watersheds Conference during each year of the grant. The
purpose of this conference is to provide these watershed organizations
with training and support to better restore, protect, and manage their
watersheds, provide help and assistance in Agency grants management
requirements and, most importantly, provide grant recipients with
opportunities to share successful approaches with each other and other
peer-to-peer learning opportunities.
Attendance at the conference will be mandatory and will be one of
the Terms and Conditions of the grant. The grantee will be allowed to
use the grant funds to pay for travel and lodging. The cost of hosting
the conference will be paid for by EPA. If the recipient wishes to use
the award money for travel expenses, these costs must be included in
the submitted proposed budget. The Agency will make every effort to
hold the three-day conference in a central location to minimize travel
costs.
(d) Information Technology. Also as a Term and Condition of the
grant, recipients will be required to institute standardized reporting
requirements into their workplans and include such costs in their
budgets. All environmental data will be required to be entered into the
Agency's Storage and Retrieval (STORET) data system and recipients may
need to purchase appropriate ORACLE software. STORET is a repository
for water quality, biological, and other physical data used by State
environmental agencies, EPA and other Federal agencies, universities,
private citizens, and many other organizations. An introduction to the
STORET system will be provided at the annual conference, as well as
information regarding training sessions sponsored by EPA. Watershed
organizations may also want to contact their State agency responsible
for entering data into the system. More information about STORET can be
found at http://www.epa.gov/STORET.
6. Appendices.
(a) Experience in Grant Management (1 page maximum).
To ensure that nominees possess the management and technical skills
required to administer the grant, a description of management
experience is needed. In a 1-page appendix to the project description,
provide information on the past experience of the project leader(s)
and/or partners in designing, implementing, coordinating activities,
and effectively managing a Federal grant. Identify the entity that will
be the grantee and thus responsible for the administration of the grant
workplan and for being the fiscal agent receiving the funds. Include
academic experience only if relevant to the proposal. Do not send resumes.
(b) Letter(s) of Support.
To substantiate the information contained in the narrative portion
of the submission, documentation to verify partnerships and matching
funds is required. Items that must accompany the narrative description
and submitted

[[Page 8369]]

as appendices include the following items.
(i) Signed letter(s) from active partners indicating their
commitment to implementing the workplan or for specific proposed
projects.
(ii) A minimum of one signed letter from an entity committing to
provide matching funds, either in cash or in-kind goods and services,
including the total value of its commitment toward the projects.
(iii) For interjurisdictional nominations, a signed letter(s) from
the appropriate organization in the adjacent State, tribe, or country
expressing their support and participation in the proposed project(s).
For example, a letter from another Governor, Tribal leader, State water
commissioner, State water quality director, environmental director, or
similar position in Canada or Mexico is acceptable.
(c) Map. A map of the watershed and the proposal work areas is
required.

C. Format

Each nomination package must contain: (1) A one-page cover letter
signed by the Governor or Tribal Leader, (2) a title page with
appropriate information, (3) a 150-word or less abstract, (4) project
description, (5) the budget form, (6) a one-page description of grant
management experience, (7) letter(s) and certification(s) of support,
and (8) maps. The project description of the nomination must be no more
than ten double-spaced pages long, using a 12-point conventional font
and one inch margins. This section must include all of the required
components listed in section IV.B. To ensure a fair and equitable
evaluation of the nominations, please do not exceed the above limits. A
nomination that contains a project description narrative that exceeds
ten double-spaced pages will not be considered. The title page,
abstract, and required appendices will not count toward the 10-page
limit. The entire nomination package should be printed on 8 1/2"x11" paper.

D. Submission Process

EPA invites each Governor and Tribal Leader to submit nominations
for grants under the 2005 Targeted Watershed Grants Program.
Nominations must be received by EPA by May 19, 2005.
1. Electronic. EPA is requiring that a portion of the nomination be
submitted electronically. Please send an electronic copy of only the
title page, abstract, project description, and budget form to the
electronic mailbox at initiative.watershed@epa.gov. Electronic
submissions are limited to 120 KB in size and one submission per
nomination. Please do not send maps, letters of support, match
certifications, or pictures of any kind via the electronic mailbox. The
subject line should be in the format ``STATE--Watershed Name'' (e.g.,
MD--Rock Creek). No confidential business information should be sent
via e-mail. If unusual or extraordinary circumstances prevent
electronic submission of the nomination, please contact the appropriate
Regional contact person to discuss alternate arrangements.
2. Paper. Two hard copies of the complete nomination package
(including all nominating and support letters) are required to be sent
by express mail or courier service. One package is to be sent to EPA
Headquarters and the other is to go to the appropriate Regional Office.
All names and addresses are listed below. Mark all submissions: ATTN:
Targeted Watersheds.

E. Submission Addresses

Submissions must be delivered to the following:
Headquarters:
Carol Peterson, Office of Wetlands, Oceans, and Watersheds; U.S.
EPA; Rm. 7136; 1301 Constitution Avenue; NW., Washington, DC 20004.
EPA Regional Offices:

Region I--Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Vermont, New
Hampshire
Marilyn Smith-Church; U.S. EPA Region 1; 1 Congress Street, Suite
1100; Mail Code CWN; Boston, MA 02114-2023.
Region II--New Jersey, New York, Puerto Rico, U.S. Virgin Islands
Cyndy Kopitsky, U.S. EPA Region 2; 290 Broadway; 24th Floor; New
York, NY 10007-1866;
Region III--Delaware, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia,
Washington, DC
Ralph Spagnolo; U.S. EPA Region 3; Mail Code 3WP12; 1650 Arch
Street; Philadelphia, PA 19103-2029.
Region IV--Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Mississippi, North Carolina,
South Carolina, Kentucky, Tennessee
William L. Cox; U.S. EPA Region 4; Sam Nunn Atlanta Federal Center;
15th Floor; 61 Forsyth Street, SW.; Atlanta, GA 30303-3104.
Region V--Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, Wisconsin
Paul Thomas; U.S. EPA Region 5; Mail Code WW-16J; 77 W. Jackson
Blvd; Chicago, IL 60604.
Region VI--Louisiana, Texas, Oklahoma, Arkansas, New Mexico
Brad Lamb; U.S. EPA Region 6; Mail Code 6WQ-EW; 1445 Ross Avenue;
Dallas, TX 75202.
Region VII--Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska
Margaret Stockdale; U.S. EPA Region 7; Mail Code WWPD/GPCB; 901
North 5th Street; Kansas City, KS 66101.
Region VIII--Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming
Peter Ismert; U.S. EPA Region 8; Mail Code 8EPR-EP; 999 18th
Street, Suite 300; Denver, CO 80202-2466.
Region IX--Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada, American Samoa, Mariana
Islands, Guam
Sam Ziegler; U.S. EPA Region 9; Mail Code WTR-3; 75 Hawthorne
Street; San Francisco, CA 94105.
Region X--Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington
Bevin Reid; U.S. EPA Region 10; Mail Code OWW-137; 1200 Sixth
Avenue; Seattle, WA 98101

F. Checklist

To assist nominees in collecting and formatting their package
materials, the following checklist is provided (Table 2). These factors
will be used by the Agency in screening the nominations for
eligibility. The absence of any of these factors could result in
disqualification from the onset without notice.

Table 2.--Checklist of Required Elements
------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Package Components:
Nominating letter signed by the Governor or Tribal Leader □
or Tribal Official......................................
Title page............................................... □
150-word Abstract........................................ □
10-page Project Description.............................. □
Budget form.............................................. □
1-page description of Grant Management Experience........ □
Letter(s) signed by active partners...................... □

[[Page 8370]]

Letter(s) committing matching funds...................... □
Letters(s) supporting inter-jurisdictional nominations □
(if applicable).........................................
Map(s)................................................... □
2. Project Description Format:
12-point font size....................................... □
Double-spaced............................................ □
1'' Margins.............................................. □
8\1/2\ x 11'' paper...................................... □
3. Match Requirement:
25% Minimum match........................................ □
Match includes Federal funds and applicant has cited □
authority...............................................
Waiver of match requested due to undue hardship (Tribal □
only)...................................................
4. Submission:
1 hard copy of all materials sent to EPA Headquarters.... □
1 hard copy of all materials sent to appropriate EPA □
Regional Office.........................................
Electronic copy of narrative text only sent to □
initiative.watershed@epa.gov (subject line: STATE-
Watershed Name).........................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

V. Application Review Information

A. Evaluation Criteria

Watershed nominations will be reviewed, evaluated, and scored based
on the following criteria with a possible total score of 60 points.
1. Innovation (10 points). Emphasis will be placed on progressive
and forward-thinking projects and watershed nominations that undertake
unique, innovative, or novel approaches to environmental problem-
solving. The Agency recognizes that there can be innovative approaches
that do not involve trading. However, for proposals that incorporate
trading approaches to water quality, EPA will view more favorably
projects that have the following characteristics: a TMDL or other
``cap'' for the pollutant is either in place or is imminent; a
pollutant that comes from numerous (point and nonpoint) sources within
the watershed and several sources have a pollutant control obligation;
and some sources that are likely to have significantly different
control costs to achieve the desired pollutant reductions.
2. Tangible Solutions (total of 30 points). Nominees will be
evaluated based on the extent they demonstrate an in-depth knowledge of
the watershed ecology, present a sound approach for combating threats
and impairments, and include a description of how environmental results
can be achieved and measured. Under this criteria, reviewers will focus
on the following components:
(a) Feasibility (10 points). Reviewers will look at how well
developed the project is, i.e., the readiness of the project, technical
merit, and expected environmental improvements. The focus will be on
nominations that describe projects that are part of larger watershed
assessments and plans, and reflect a watershed-based approach to
conservation and restoration. The evaluation will focus on the overall
soundness of the nomination from both an ecological and design
perspective with an emphasis on those projects that can be implemented
quickly. In summary, the evaluation will focus on whether nominees have
demonstrated an understanding of priority water resource problems
within the watershed, have substantially completed the assessment and
planning phase, and are prepared to begin work.
(b) Environmental Measures (15 points). Under this criterion, a
nomination will be evaluated based on how well it is supported by a
clearly articulated set of performance and progress measures, and
identified and measurable environmental indicators. A more detailed
monitoring and data collection strategy is preferred. Reviewers will
evaluate the proposal in relation to its likelihood to achieve
predicted measurable, defensible environmental results in a relatively
short time period, including potentially attaining expected outcomes,
reaching project goals, and producing on-the-ground, quantifiable
environmental change using sound science.
(c) Integration (5 points). Reviewers will evaluate the extent to
which the proposed project plan provides an approach that integrates
various tools including, but not limited to, those provided by local,
State, Tribal and Federal programs, to solve the environmental
problems. Emphasis will be placed on how well the proposal demonstrates
a thoughtful and a strategic approach to problem-solving.
3. Broad Support (total of 10 points). Acknowledging and responding
to representative interests from a broad and varied perspective is
crucial to any successful watershed enterprise. This criteria will be
based on the nominees ability to demonstrate and substantiate a strong
collaborative effort.
(a) Partnerships (5 points). The reviewers will examine whether the
watershed nomination incorporates a wide variety of public, private,
and non-profit participation. The evaluation will be based on the level
to which a nominee can demonstrate strong and diverse stakeholder
stewardship and support. Reviewers will look for documented, effective
working relationships among State, Tribal, and local entities, along
with evidence of broad-based community involvement.
(b) Interjurisdictionality (5 points). Reviewers will evaluate
whether the nomination actively involves more than one governmental
entity, be it municipal, county, State, Tribal, Federal or country.
Reviewers will look at the depth and breadth of jurisdictional
participation and will also take into consideration any significant
parties that are noticeably absent in lending their support of the
nomination.
4. Outreach (5 points). Proposals will be evaluated on the design
and breadth of their outreach program with an emphasis on those
proposals that demonstrate a clear strategy for transferring the
knowledge and experience garnered over the next few years to other
watersheds with similar environmental conditions. Reviewers will also
assess how the proposal addresses training and educational approaches
to disseminating information about successful approaches and results.
5. Financial Integrity (5 points). The evaluation will examine the
adequacy of the budget information provided, and whether the budget is
reasonable and clearly presented. Reviewers will also consider the
extent that the proposal exceeds the minimum match requirement or can
certify a broad range of leveraging capacity.

[[Page 8371]]

B. Review and Selection Process

Governors and Tribal Leaders are to submit their watershed
nominations to EPA. Once received by EPA, the nominations will undergo
four phases of review. In phase one, all nominations will be pre-
reviewed, or screened, by EPA Regional staff to determine if they are
eligible, complete, and prepared in accordance with the instructions
provided in this notice. If any of the required elements of the
nomination package are inadvertently omitted, EPA may choose to contact
the nominee. In phase two, each of the Agency's Regional Offices will
convene a Review and Evaluation Panel to initially assess how well the
nominations meet the evaluation criteria described above. Based on the
panel review and recommendations, each Regional Administrator will then
forward the Region's top three candidates to EPA Headquarters Office of
Water in Washington, DC.
Phases three and four of the review process will occur at the
national level. Upon receipt of the Regional recommendations, the
Office of Water will convene a Technical Advisory Panel consisting of
representatives from the Agency's Program and Regional Offices to
review and rank the watershed nominations. In addition to the
evaluation criteria listed above, factors such as geographic diversity,
project diversity, watershed size, urban/rural mix, and cost will be
considered in ranking nominations. During phase four, the National
Panel will present its findings and recommendations to the Assistant
Administrator of Water for approval and transmittal to the
Administrator. The Administrator will make the final decision on the
watersheds to be funded. Finalists will be contacted by telephone. All
nominees, including those who are not selected for funding, will be
notified by mail.
EPA expects to announce the selected watershed nominations in the
summer of 2005. Selected watershed grantees will complete the grant
award process, including final grant workplan negotiations through the
appropriate EPA Regional Office in the fall of 2005. In general, grants
awarded will be one-time awards and grant recipients should use the
funds within 2-3 years (slightly longer for trading projects). Any
subsequent Targeted Watersheds Grant funding would involve a new call
for watershed nominations and is predicated on continued
appropriations. Therefore, any proposal for work beyond the initial
funding period would need to be submitted through the competitive
process and will not receive preferential consideration based on the
applicant's previous award.

VI. Post-Selection Award Administration Information

A. Applying for a Grant

EPA will invite only nominees whose proposals are selected to
submit grant applications. Once notified that their proposal has been
selected for funding, the nominee will have 60 days to complete the
formal grant application process (i.e., Application for Federal
Assistance, Standard Form 424 et al). The standard EPA grants
application package must be filed according to Agency guidelines.
Detailed information and assistance, including an application kit,
required forms, and a check list, can be found at http://www.epa.gov/
ogd/AppKit/. In anticipation of this process, all potential nominees
may want to explore the above Web site for useful and pertinent
information prior to preparing and submitting their nomination materials.
A new policy directive from the Office of Management and Budget
effective October 1, 2004 requires grant applicants to provide a number
from the Dun and Bradstreet (D&B) Data Universal Numbering System
(DUNS) when applying for Federal assistance agreements. Organizations
can receive a DUNS number at no cost by calling the toll free DUNS
number request line at 1-866-705-5711. Additional information on
obtaining a DUNS number can also be found at: http://www.dnb.com.
The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance number for this program
is 66.439 Targeted Watershed Initiative. Any disputes regarding
proposals or applications submitted in response to these guidelines
will be resolved in accordance with 40 CFR 30.63 and part 31, subpart
F. Applicants will be notified if dispute provisions change. Applicants
should clearly mark information they consider confidential. EPA will
make final confidentiality determinations in accordance with
regulations in 40 CFR part 2, subpart B.
Although the selections will be announced at the national level,
Targeted Watershed grants will be awarded and managed by the respective
EPA Regional Offices. Selected nominees may be asked to modify
objectives, workplans, or budgets prior to final approval of the grant
award. The exact amount of funds to be awarded, the final scope of
activities, the duration of the projects, and specific role of the EPA
Regional Project Officer will be determined in the pre-award
negotiations between the selected nominee and EPA. The designated EPA
Regional Contact listed in section VII will be available to provide
additional guidance in completing the grant application, and other
necessary forms, and answering any questions. EPA will also work with
the applicant to comply with the Intergovernmental review requirements
of Executive Order 12372 and 40 CFR part 29. Grant applicants will
receive a notice of award through postal mail. The notice of award
signed by the Award Official (or equivalent) in the Grants
Administration Division is the authorizing document, and will be mailed
to the individual signing the original application.

B. Administrative and National Policy Requirements

Certain quality assurance and/or quality control (QA/QC) and peer
review requirements are applicable to the collection of environmental
data. Applicants should allow sufficient time and resources for this
process in their proposed projects. Environmental data are any
measurements or information that describe environmental processes,
location, or condition; ecological or health effects and consequences;
or the performance of environmental technology. Environmental data also
include information collected directly from measurements, produced from
models, and obtained from other sources such as data bases or published
literature. Regulations pertaining to QA/QC requirements can be found
in 40 CFR 30.54 and 31.45. Additional guidance can be found at
http://www.epa.gov/quality/qa_docs.html#noeparqt.

C. Reporting

Project monitoring and reporting requirements can be found in 40
CFR 30.50-30.52, 40 CFR 31.40-31.41 and 40 CFR 40.160.1-40.160.5. In
general, grantees are responsible for managing the day-to-day
operations and activities supported by the grant to assure compliance
with applicable Federal requirements, and for ensuring that established
milestones and performance goals are being achieved. Performance
reports and financial reports must be submitted quarterly and are due
30 days after the reporting period. The format of these reports will be
identified during the grant application time frame, and will include
reporting on established performance measures indicated in the project
description (i.e., environmental, infrastructure, and implementation
measures). The final report is due 90 days after the grant has expired.
Grant managers should consult, and work

[[Page 8372]]

closely with, their Regional contact person throughout the award period.

VII. Agency Contacts

Headquarters:
Carol Peterson, telephone 202-566-1034; e-mail
initiative.watershed@epa.gov.
EPA Regional Offices:

Region I--Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Vermont, New
Hampshire
Marilyn Smith-Church or Jerry Potamis, telephones 617-918-1133 and
617-918-1651; e-mails
smith-church.marilyn@epa.gov and potamis.gerald@epa.gov, respectively.

Region II--New Jersey, New York, Puerto Rico, U.S. Virgin Islands
Cyndy Kopitsky; telephone 212-637-3832; e-mail
kopitsky.cyndy@epa.gov.

Region III--Delaware, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia,
Washington, DC
Ralph Spagnolo, telephone 215-814-2718; e-mail
spagnolo.ralph@epa.gov.

Region IV--Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Mississippi, North Carolina,
South Carolina, Kentucky, Tennessee
William L. Cox, telephone 404-562-9351; e-mail
cox.williaml@epa.gov.

Region V--Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, Wisconsin
Paul Thomas, telephone 312-886-7742; e-mail thomas.paul@epa.gov.
Region VI--Louisiana, Texas, Oklahoma, Arkansas, New Mexico
Brad Lamb, telephone 214-665-6683; e-mail lamb.brad@epa.gov.
Region VII--Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska
Margaret Stockdale, telephone 913-551-7936; e-mail
stockdale.margaret@epa.gov.

Region VIII--Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming
Peter Ismert; telephone 303-312-6215; e-mail ismert.peter@epa.gov.
Region IX--Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada, American Samoa, Mariana
Islands, Guam
Sam Ziegler, telephone 415-972-3399; e-mail ziegler.sam@epa.gov.
Region X--Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington
Bevin Reid, telephone 206-553-1566; e-mail Reid.BevinG@epa.gov.

Dated: February 14, 2005.
Benjamin H. Grumbles,
Assistant Administrator for Water.
[FR Doc. 05-3184 Filed 2-17-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P

Notices For
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
1994

Targeted Watersheds Grant Program: Call for Nominations

Local Navigation