GLBTS Links
Great Lakes Binational Toxics Strategy
IMPLEMENTING THE BINATIONAL
TOXICS STRATEGY
Implementation
Stakeholders Forum
November 16-17,
1998 -
Chicago, Illinois
Dioxins/Furans Workgroup Meeting Minutes
Workgroup Leaders:
Linda Martin USEPA Region V
Sandro Leonardelli Environment Canada, Ontario Region
Facilitator:
John Menkedick, Battelle
After a review of the objectives for the day, the meeting opened with an update by the workgroup leaders on activity since the last meeting, focusing on the recently released government inventories.
Assessment of Current Inventories
Linda Martin, Sandro Leonardelli, and Dwain Winters each presented an update related to the government inventories. Linda focused on an assessment, prepared by Battelle, that addressed specific questions raised at the initial March 23 stakeholder meeting. Sandro focused on the Canadian draft inventory, activities of the Federal/Provincial Task Force on Dioxins and Furans, and the linking of Canada's efforts under the Binational Toxics Strategy with proposed national prevention and reduction initiatives under the Canada Wide Standards process. And Dwain discussed technical issues and uncertainty associated with estimating national and regional dioxin/furan emissions.
A question was raised about whether the release estimate to water included in Battelle's report represented both dioxin and furan emissions, or only dioxin emissions for the '94 Draft Reassessment estimate. Dwain Winters agreed to check on the estimates, and by the end of the day, it was agreed that the estimate did represent both dioxin and furan emissions. It was suggested that it should be made clear that estimates attributed to the '94 Draft Reassessment are not associated with data collected during 1994. A reference year is not specified for the emissions reported in the '94 reassessment.
Concern was expressed over the accuracy of the cement kiln release estimates in the Canadian inventory, and, in general, of emission numbers that are currently being revised. Andre Auger requested that Sandro Leonardelli explore the possibility of sharing final inventory estimates with industry before they are released.
Another question was raised on how Canada handles measurements in which the level of dioxin/furan is below the detection limit in its inventory estimates. Sandro agreed to check into this and report back.
Further discussion ensued on topics including:
- uncertainty in the inventories and technical reasons for the uncertainty;
- difficulties with making regional emission estimates (i.e emissions within the Great Lakes Basin) for the U.S.;
- potentially significant sources that are not well characterized including residential wood burning, 'open barrel burning', iron sintering, electric-arc furnaces, secondary copper smelting, commercial combustion with hot-sided electrostatic precipitators; and
- the effect of chlorine in the feedstock on dioxin emissions.
Development of a Work Plan
The meeting moved to a discussion of development of a work plan for the workgroup with emphasis on activities for the next six months and the role of this workgroup in relation to dioxin reduction efforts. Four broad categories of action were discussed:
- promotion of data gathering to improve baseline information
- motivating sources to engage in release reductions
- compliance assistance and monitoring for regulated industries
- information sharing and outreach to parties involved in dioxin reductions.
Dale Phenicie mentioned CGLI has begun efforts to outreach to industry for dioxin issues as documented in their report distributed at the meeting. The workgroup identified iron sintering, the steel industry (electric-arc furnaces), and secondary copper smelting as three sectors to initially focus on in the outreach effort. Dale agreed to begin conversation with these sectors. Focus of the engagement would be on: 1) information on emission levels; 2) what progress has been made in reducing emissions; 3) what plans are in place; and 4) what are impediments to progress. It was suggested that the governments could help frame the issues and hone the questions for contacting these industries. EC/EPA will set up a teleconference with Dale for this purpose. Dale agreed CGLI would initiate contacts and report back in February via CGLI?s quarterly report that are prepared for the EPA. This information will also be shared during the dioxin workgroup call to be scheduled in February.
Another major source area that was discussed was combustion of garbage. Three aspects were discussed:
1. Compliance assistance for major commercial combusters that are already regulated, for example, municipal waste combusters. These efforts would be directed at sectors in transition between regulations and compliance. Ideas proposed for potential consideration included:
- sharing technology and processes for reaching compliance;
- incentives for early compliance;
- local community involvement in 'watching', i.e., monitoring progress towards compliance;
- coordination with federal and state compliance efforts.
It was agreed to post a 'call for interest' in the minutes to determine the interest of workgroup members in focusing on compliance monitoring, assistance, and acceleration efforts. This serves as that call and this issue will be discussed on the next workgroup conference call.
2. Open or uncontrolled burning of residential or small commercial waste (barrel burning). There was a significant interest expressed in this issue. There was discussion of how well characterized this source was, with some members cautioning that it may be too early to proceed, and others maintaining the problem is known, only the extent is unknown. USEPA is currently collecting emissions data on barrel burning. It was agreed that a conference call could be arranged for a subgroup of interested stakeholders to begin discussion of possible education, outreach, and compliance assistance activities related to open burning of trash. It was suggested that there should be a focus on the Lake Superior region and local government involvement. This effort will be coordinated with the Lake Superior Team efforts within EPA.
3. Waste minimization. Reduction of waste into combusters was identified as perhaps the only known factor that is simply linearly related to dioxin production and one of the most effective methods for reducing emissions.
The final sector addressed was the pulp and paper industry. There was agreement that there have been dramatic reductions in dioxin/furan releases to water from this sector and it was suggested that release reductions in the pulp and paper industry could be highlighted as a ?success story? at the next stakeholder meeting. A caution was also expressed that while significant progress has been made, there may still be unfinished business in light of continual use of chlorine in the bleaching process.
Action Items & Next Steps
1. CGLI will contact the ferrous and non-ferrous metals processing industry (electric-arc steel furnaces, iron sintering, and secondary copper smelting).
- EPA will arrange a conference call to prepare for the contacts.
- CGLI will report back by February.
- A conference call will be held in February to discuss results.
2. A conference call will be held on open or uncontrolled burning of residential or small commercial waste ('open barrel burning'). EC/EPA will develop an agenda and schedule the call.
3. A call for interest in pursuing compliance monitoring, assistance and acceleration efforts will be placed in the minutes and the issue discussed on the next workgroup conference call.
4. The workgroup agreed to regular conference calls at approximately 6 to 8 week intervals with the first call scheduled for January 6 at 10:00 a.m. CST. A preliminary agenda is attached. Comments on the agenda should be forwarded to Sandro Leonardelli with EC. Subsequent calls are tentatively scheduled for February 19, 1999, and March 31, 1999.
5. Dwain Winters will report back on the interpretation of Pulp & paper mill water releases referenced on page 2 in Battelle's report. This action item was resolved at the end of the day with confirmation that the numbers do represent dioxin and furan emissions for all three estimates on page 2. It should be noted the estimates from the '94 Assessment' is not associated with data collected in 1994 or any specified reference year.
6. Sandro Leonardelli will report back on how measurements below the detection limit were handled in the Canadian inventory.
7. Other government actions:
- Canada and the U.S. will proceed with inventory finalization. Canada's final inventory is expected to be released in time to be discussed on the January 6 conference call
- Linkage will be made between Canada's multi-stakeholder group for the national dioxin/furan task force and the BNS
- Canada will finalize its LOQ
- Progress of adding dioxin to TRI and NPR will be monitored and reported to the workgroup.
* The next BNS stakeholders meeting is planned for April 1999 in Ontario.
Draft Agenda
BNS Dioxins Workgroup Conference Call
January 6, 1999
- Summary of Final Canadian Inventory
- Discussion of Dioxin in Products, Particularly PCP Treated Wood
- Discussion of Compliance Monitoring and Assistance Possibilities for the Workgroup
- Continue November 16's Discussion on the BNS Workgroup's Work Plan
- Action Items & Next Steps.
Participants Roster
Dioxin/Furan Workgroup Meeting|
November 16, 1998
| Andre Auger | St. Lawrence Cement |
| Tim Eder | National Wildlife Federation |
| Herb Estreicher | Covington & Burling |
| Don Hames | Dow Chemical Canada Inc. |
| Dan Hopkins | USEPA Region V |
| Tom Hornshaw | Illinois EPA |
| Nancy Larson | WDNR |
| Sandro Leonardelli | Environment Canada |
| Jeff Lynn | International Paper |
| Linda Martin | USEPA Region V |
| John Menkedick | Battelle |
| Debra Meyer | USEPA NERL |
| William Mills | School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago |
| Tom Murray | USEPA |
| Janet Pellegrini | USEPA Region V |
| Dale Phenicie | Council of Great Lakes Industries |
| Jeff Sloan | Chlorine Chemistry Council |
| Lisa Smith | Amoco Corporation |
| Diane Spencer | USEPA Region V |
| Geoffrey Thornburn | IJC Canadian Section |
| Dwain Winters | USEPA |
![[logo] US EPA](http://www.epa.gov/epafiles/images/logo_epaseal.gif)