 |
 |
|
FY
2005 - 06 Funding |
|
|
|
Great
Lakes |
USEPA Great Lakes National Program Office
FY2005-2006 Funding Guidance
Under this FY2005-2006 Funding Guidance, the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency's (USEPA's) Great Lakes National Program Office (GLNPO)
is requesting Great Lakes project submissions addressing one or more
of the following topics: Pollution Prevention and Toxics Reduction,
Habitat (Ecological) Protection and Restoration, Emerging or
Strategic Issues (including Invasive Species), Remedial Action Plan
(RAP) Priorities, and Lakewide Management Plan (LaMP) Priorities.
This funding opportunity is issued pursuant to (i) §104 of the Clean
Water Act, authorizing EPA to conduct and promote the coordination
and acceleration of, research, investigations, experiments,
training, demonstrations, surveys, and studies relating to the
causes, effects, extent, prevention, reduction, and elimination of
pollution and (ii) §118 of the Clean Water Act calling for the
achievement of the goals in the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement,
the principal goal of that Agreement being the restoration and
maintenance of the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of
the Great Lakes basin. Projects funded under this solicitation will
advance protection and restoration of the Great Lakes ecosystem in
support of Goal 4 (Healthy Communities and Ecosystems), Objective 3
(Ecosystems), Subobjective 3 (Improve the Health of Great Lakes
Ecosystems) of USEPA’s Strategic Plan <http://www.epa.gov/ocfo/plan/plan.htm>.
In support of Subobjective 4.3.3, and consistent with EPA Order
5700.7 <http://www.epa.gov/ogd/grants/award/5700.7.pdf> on
environmental results, awards issued pursuant to the respective
topics above will be expected to accomplish various environmental
outcomes and include various environmental outputs. Each topic area
includes a description of some of the possible environmental
outcomes/outputs for that area, not all of which would be achievable
within an assistance agreement funding period, and not all of which
would necessarily result from each project selected.
Descriptions of each topic and priorities, Expected
Outputs/Outcomes, Projects of Particular Interest, Examples, and
estimated target amounts follow. Estimates of dollar amounts and
numbers of projects are included as planning targets only. The
actual amounts and numbers may differ substantially as described in
Section II - Award Information. Amounts, Targets, and Number of
Projects. In addition, EPA reserves the right to make no awards
under this announcement.
Applicants will be required to categorize each of their project
submissions into one of the topic areas described below. Submissions
will be evaluated within the applicable topic areas. Section V
identifies general criteria applicable to all submissions and
Specific Criteria applicable to the respective topic areas.
GLNPO requests
project submissions for pollution prevention, reduction, or
elimination projects, with an emphasis on substances which are
persistent and toxic, especially those which bioaccumulate, in the
Great Lakes basin. Under this topic area, an estimated $500,000 is
targeted for approximately 8-15 projects.
Expected Environmental Outcomes/Outputs. Will include among the
following:
- Improved toxic source and emissions inventories.
- Removal/Reductions of toxic substances from the GL Basin.
- Adoption of innovative ideas such as green chemistry or
engineering, and environmentally preferable purchasing.
- A better informed public about the health threats associated with
toxic substances.
- Information to help target persistent toxic substances for
pollution prevention and reduction activities.
Please note that projects addressing Pollutant-related Beneficial
Use Impairments, including de-listing target development, should be
submitted under Section I.D. - “RAP Priorities.”
Projects of Particular Interest. We are particularly interested in
the following projects:
- Source characterization: Assessment of potential sources of
persistent toxic substances.
- Indicators of progress toward virtual elimination of persistent
toxic substances.
- Proper disposal of persistent toxic substances.
- Foster adoption of innovative products that would reduce the use
and release of persistent toxic substances and that are consistent
with the principles of EPA's Environmentally- Preferable Purchasing
Program (see http://www.epa.gov/opptintr/epp).
- Implementation of projects/actions delivering toxic
reductions/pollution prevention in sectors targeted by the Great
Lakes Binational Toxics Strategy (GLBTS). Expected environmental
outcomes must be quantified.
- Foster adoption of green technologies. In this context, green
technology involves reducing or eliminating the use or generation of
persistent toxic substances - including feedstocks, reagents,
solvents, products and byproducts-during design, manufacture and use
of chemical products and processes.
- Outreach to achieve source reductions from targeted sectors or
groups, e.g., designing a campaign for educating the XX industry on
ways to reduce usage and releases of YY chemical.
- Predictive emerging chemical screening/modeling studies to
anticipate potential exposure and/or risk from emerging chemical
threats in the basin, based on emissions, wastewater effluent
discharge, or other potential sources of emerging chemicals to the
basin, fate and transport properties, and known or estimated
toxicological properties.
Following are the Pollution Prevention and Reduction Projects of
Particular Interest for each Lake basin, as derived from Lakewide
Management Plans:
- Lake Erie and St.Clair/Lake St. Clair/Detroit River basins.
Projects addressing the chemicals associated with the beneficial use
impairments as identified by the Lake Erie LaMP (PBT, mercury, PAHs,
lead, chlordane, dioxins, DDE/DDT, mirex) with priority in the
evaluation process given to projects involving PBT and mercury or
which reduce the release of atrazine to the waters of Lake Erie.
- Lake Huron basin. Projects which:
- address pollutants causing beneficial use impairments in Areas
of Concern -- especially PBT, Chlordane, Dioxin, and Mercury -- but
also including PAHs, heavy metals, and other compounds identified in
the Saginaw River/Bay and St. Marys River RAPs.
- demonstrate innovative approaches to address the long-range
transport of atmospheric pollutants to Lake Huron.
- Lake Michigan Basin. Innovative projects which:
- demonstrate innovative technologies for control of pollutant
loadings through a watershed assessment plan.
- address dioxin and other pollutants formed from "burning trash
in barrels."
- further agricultural clean sweep efforts.
- collect and/or phase out PCB and Mercury, including urban clean
sweeps.
- prevent pollution from pesticides, including substitution or
reduction projects, with high priority given to atrazine.
- work to implement an impaired waters strategy or incremental
steps toward virtual elimination of PCB and mercury, consistent with
a traditional Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) approach for Lake
Michigan.
- enhance and/or utilize Lake Michigan LaMP 2004 watershed fact
sheets.
- Lake Ontario, St. Lawrence River and Niagara River basins.
Projects which:
- address pollutants identified in the Lake Ontario LaMP Status
Report 2004, Chapter 6 (PCBs, DDTs, mercury, mirex, dieldrin, and
dioxins), and emerging toxics such as PBDE as well as projects along
the Niagara River which address the priority toxics identified in
the Niagara River Toxics Management Plan.
- reduce mercury or other pollutants by building upon, or
initiating projects similar in concept to auto mercury switch/
thermometer replacement; mercury collections from medical
facilities; or electronic equipment collections.
- reduce pesticides through clean sweeps.
- demonstrate innovative technologies for control of pollutant
loadings from the watershed.
- promote household hazardous waste collection efforts that
address bioaccumulative contaminants.
- reduce PCBs from transformers.
- address the source of PCB contamination in the 18-Mile Creek.
- Lake Superior Basin. Projects which characterize and reduce
sources of Lake Superior critical pollutants in the Lake Superior
Basin and otherwise address the main joint priorities of the Lake
Superior Workgroup and the Lake Superior Forum. These include
projects which:
- address the mercury reduction commitments in the LaMP 2000,
including basinwide mercury reduction projects (especially for the
shipping industry and community collections); energy efficiency or
alternative energy; and proactive mercury reductions at proposed new
or expanded facilities in the basin.
- enhance open burning outreach and education, provide incentives
to not burn, identify and lower infrastructure barriers and assist
local government restrictions on burning.
- update in-basin inventories of mercury, PCBs, dioxin and hexachlorobenzene in preparation for the 2005 load reduction
milestone reporting
- otherwise address the chemicals identified as critical
pollutants, including PCBs, dioxins, DDT and metabolites, toxaphene,
chlordane, aldrin/dieldrin, mercury, hexachlorobenzene and
octachlorostyrene, as well as PAHs, BHC, cadmium, and heptachlor.
- demonstrate significant reductions of non-point loadings of
critical and other pollutants originating from the development of
previously undeveloped land such as new parking lots and highway
construction.
- address the long-range transport of atmospheric pollutants to
Lake Superior.
Contact: Ted Smith (312) 353-6571,
smith.edwin@epa.gov
Further information: Please see
http://www.epa.gov/glnpo/p2.html
GLNPO requests
Great Lakes Habitat (ecological) Protection and Restoration project
submissions. Under this topic, an estimated $300,000 is targeted for
approximately14-21 projects.
Expected Environmental Outcomes/Outputs. Will include among the
following:
- An improvement in the ecological integrity of the Great Lakes
basin;
- An improvement in the quality and increase in the size of
biologically diverse ecosystems;
- A greater understanding by those involved in managing and
protecting ecosystems of ecosystem functions and processes;
- An increase in collaborative partnerships that leverage resources
for protection and restoration activities;
- A greater awareness by the people of the Great Lakes basin of the
inter-relatedness of ecosystem health and human health; and,
- An increase in the kinds and numbers of protection and restoration
activities involving citizens that produce measurable benefits to
ecosystem health.
Please note that:
- projects addressing Habitat-related Beneficial Use Impairments for
Areas of Concern should be submitted under Section I.D. - “RAP
Priorities.”
- “Projects of Particular Interest” addressing Habitat Protection
and Restoration for Lakes Huron and Ontario should be submitted
under Section I.E. - LaMP Priorities.
1. Basinwide/Regional Projects. An estimated amount of up to
$250,000 will be awarded for approximately 4-6 projects that are
Great Lakes basinwide or regional in scope. Projects must be
collaborative partnerships that demonstrate common goals and
expected outcomes.
Examples. For reference, the type of projects which may be selected
include:
- Multi-organizational, binational partnerships to protect or
restore ecosystems that currently lack over-arching, strategic
management.
- Projects addressing Lakewide Management Plan (LaMP) habitat
priorities. The LaMPs are available from
http://www.epa.gov/glnpo/gl2000/lamps/index.html. For your reference, we include these examples of the type of
projects which may be selected:
- In Lake Erie, refine or develop indicators for Lake Erie species
and habitats, and implement the Lake Erie LaMP Habitat strategy.
- In Lake Huron, restoration of natural tributary flows,
increasing fish spawning habitats, protect and restore shorelines,
quantify and prioritize coastal wetlands in Saginaw Bay, and assess
and restore off-shore reef habitats.
- In Lake Michigan, develop and implement a watershed-wide
biodiversity recovery plan and a plan for species reliant on ground
and surface water interaction, protect and restore fish spawning
habitats and rare ecosystems, create a GIS layer of habitat and
ground water/surface water exchange, and enhance and/or utilize Lake
Michigan LaMP 2004 Watershed Fact Sheets.
- In Lake Ontario, LaMP habitat priority projects other than
those identified in Section I.E.4.
- In Lake Superior, develop and field test a basin-wide herptile
monitoring program, including a data repository process; develop and
establish a land-use and land cover monitoring program; establish a
pilot program for an ecological land-use decision process for local
governments; restore tributary and embayment habitats to
rehabilitate lake sturgeon, lake and brook trout and walleye;
identify and quantify critical habitats for self-sustaining fish
stocks; develop a pelagic and benthic fish monitoring program; and
establish reference sites for representative ecosystems.
2. Habitat (Ecological) Conferences and Printing. An estimated
amount of up to $50,000 is targeted for approximately 10-15
conference/meeting or education material projects that address Great
Lakes ecological protection and restoration issues, information
and/or actions. Each project submission may be for up to $5,000 and
have a budget period of one year or less. Projects in excess of
$5,000 or having a longer budget period will be rejected for
consideration under this topic, but may, at the discretion of GLNPO,
be transferred to the general Habitat topic as a Basinwide/Regional
project.
Contact: Karen Rodriguez, (312) 353-2690,
rodriguez.karen@epa.gov
In order to better fulfill its
mission under the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement for the
restoration and maintenance of the chemical, physical, and
biological integrity of the Great Lakes Basin Ecosystem, GLNPO is
requesting project submissions which identify and propose
solutions/mitigation for Emerging or Strategic issues of Great Lakes
Basin-wide applicability. An estimated amount from between $0 -
$600,000 may be targeted for approximately 0 to 12 projects. The
total budget for such projects cannot be determined at this time,
and is largely contingent on the amount, if any, available after
making provision for every-five-year expenditures for seaworthiness
of the Lake Guardian. The amount of these expenditures may not be
known until October, 2005, consequently decisions for this topic may
be delayed until then. Of the total available estimated amount,
$100,000 would be targeted for Invasive Species.
We expect that Emerging or Strategic Issues projects would:
- not fit neatly under other existing GLNPO funding categories
(i.e., Pollution Prevention, Habitat Protection and Restoration, or
the specific projects requested for LaMP and RAP implementation) but
might contain elements of one or more of those topics;
- address assessment, causes and/or effects of chemical or
biological pollutants not in the regulatory "mainstream;"
- cut across or overlap two or more of the foregoing areas; or
- address some other unanticipated area.
Expected Environmental Outcomes/Outputs. Will include among the
following:
- An improvement in the restoration and maintenance of the chemical,
physical, and biological integrity of the Great Lakes basin.
- A greater understanding of the chemical, physical, and biological
integrity of the Great Lakes basin by those involved in its
management.
- Increased protection of the biological integrity of the Great
Lakes basin from aquatic and terrestrial invasive species.
- Increased protection of human health.
Examples. For reference, the type of projects which may be selected
include:
- Projects which address invasive (non-indigenous) aquatic and
terrestrial species in the Great Lakes Basin with an emphasis on
prevention or control. Projects may include:
- development and demonstration of effective and innovative
programs to prevent the introduction of new invasive species
(aquatic or terrestrial) into the Great Lakes Basin or to control
the spread of invasive species within and from the Great Lakes
Basin.
- documenting ecological impacts of invasive species on the Great
Lakes Basin food web.
- documenting the economic impacts or potential economic impacts of
invasive species already in the Great Lakes Basin.
- identification of chemical, physical, and biological conditions
that promote the establishment of invasive species.
- development of innovative education/outreach projects.
- monitoring and follow-up on past invasive species controls.
- Investigation of chemicals of potential environmental concern
such as polybrominated flame retardants, pharmaceuticals, and
endocrine disruptors.
- Documentation and investigation of causes and effects of observed
changes in components of the Great Lakes ecosystem (for example,
population estimates, nutrient loads; changes in lower food web
assemblages, including Mysis, Diporeia, benthos and plankton; and
effects of these changes on the lake fisheries).
- Quantify and/or assess the connection between environmental
contamination directly related to Great Lakes water quality and
human health.
- Social and economic issues affecting Great Lakes management and
environmental decision-making.
- Harnessing the innovation of market forces in environmental
protection via air or water emissions trading.
- Conferences, workshops, and meetings whose theme addresses
strategically important issues under the under the Great Lakes Water
Quality Agreement (GLWQA), the 2002 Great Lakes Strategy <http://www.epa.gov/grtlakes/gls/index.html>, and or the Great
Lakes Executive Order <http://www.epa.gov/glnpo/collaboration/index.html>.
- Projects that facilitate linking Federal, State, Tribal, and/or
local efforts to integrate and update strategic priorities and help
align programs and actions needed to plan for and implement Great
Lakes restoration progress.
- Human health projects, including fish consumption outreach to
minority and sensitive populations to increase the understanding of
fish consumption advisories.
USEPA requests project submissions which advance
Remedial Action Plan implementation and development. Under this
topic, an estimated amount of $2,440,000 is targeted for
approximately 7-20 projects.
Funding for some RAP "program implementation awards for Great Lakes
States" is not included in this Funding Guidance pursuant to a
January 8, 2004 exemption from USEPA's Policy for Competition in
Assistance Agreements. USEPA has contacted States separately to
discuss assistance pursuant to this exemption, and plans to support
enhanced RAP program management and implementation support.
During the evaluation process, applicable State environmental
agencies may be asked whether they support projects being considered
pursuant to this Section I. D. Applicants will be asked to document
support from the applicable State environmental agency before an
award will be issued.
USEPA has worked extensively with States, Tribes, and other partners
in development and implementation of Remedial Action Plans.
Information about Remedial Action Plans is available from:
http://www.epa.gov/glnpo/aoc/index.html
A table showing the status of delisting targets for all US Areas of
Concern (AOCs) is at:
http://www.glc.org/spac/proceedings/documents/Delisting-targets_US-AOCs_000.xls
Expected Environmental Outcomes/Outputs. Will include among the
following:
- Restoration of beneficial use(s) in an AOC, either on a
subwatershed, river reach, or AOC wide basis.
- Collection of monitoring data allowing for an AOC redesignation
into Recovery Stage.
- Collection of monitoring data allowing for the formal delisting of
an AOC.
- Development of measurable delisting criteria for a State RAP
program and/or the development of measurable delisting targets for
beneficial use impairments in individual AOCs.
- Development and implementation of restoration projects in
individual AOCs which address impaired beneficial uses.
- Reevaluation of exiting BUIs to determine if they are still
applicable.
- Development of monitoring strategies to determine if restoration
activities have achieved stated delisting targets.
- Delisting of Areas of Concern.
Projects of Particular Interest:
1. Setting RAP Delisting Criteria and Targets for US AOCs*.
Projects
for setting RAP delisting criteria and targets of one or more of the
US AOCs, including:
- develop statewide delisting criteria
- setting delisting targets for identified beneficial use
impairments
- re-evaluate beneficial use impairments and adjust remediation
strategies and ecosystem restoration efforts as necessary for the
elimination of impairments and AOC delisting
- formal delisting of individual AOCs which would include the
development of delisting documents.
2. Projects Leading to Delisting of RAP Beneficial Use Impairments
(BUIs) in the AOCs*. Projects that result in measurable progress
toward meeting BUI delisting targets, including coordination and
implementation of remediation efforts as identified in the RAP.
- The project submission or the negotiated workplan for the
implementation of actions leading to the delisting of an AOC must
include a comprehensive, detailed schedule of actions that will
achieve complete AOC delisting, ideally by a target date of 2010.
The project submission, or the negotiated workplan will need to
include:
- for each BUI identified as impaired:
- detailed descriptions of all remedial and restoration actions
required to delist a BUI;
- a cost estimate and schedule for each of these actions,
including the identification of additional funding sources, as
needed; and
- a detailed description and cost estimate of postremedial
monitoring, as necessary, to satisfy delisting criteria.
- for BUIs of unknown status:
- a detailed description and cost estimate of the monitoring
required to definitively determine the status of a BUI; and
- an outline of proposed remedial actions (as above) that would be
required for BUI delisting should monitoring results indicate an
impairment. Note that the Oswego AOC is not eligible for this topic
of funding.
- Projects aimed at significantly contributing to the delisting of
an AOC may include:
- The implementation of restoration or remedial efforts that will
lead to the delisting of an existing identified BUI. Projects of
this type should also include post-remedial monitoring, as
necessary, to satisfy delisting criteria for an individual BUI.
- Monitoring efforts aimed at evaluating the status of beneficial
use impairments (BUIs) which require further assessment. (See
http://www.epa.gov/greatlakes/fund/2005guid/NYStateBUITable.pdf for
a table of BUIs that have been identified by New York State
Department of Environmental Conservation as requiring further
assessment.) These efforts should be sufficient in scope to lead to
a definitive change in the use impairment status, for example from
"unknown" to either "impaired", "unimpaired", or "attributable to
sources outside the AOC".
3. AOC Post Remedial Monitoring*. Projects which develop post
remedial monitoring plans for measuring the achievement of BUI
delisting targets and for specific monitoring needs which cannot be
supported by existing monitoring programs.
4. RAP Program Capacity/Coordination/Management for St. Lawrence
Massena, Buffalo River, and/or the Rochester Embayment RAPs. An
estimated amount of up to $1.5 million has been targeted for
approximately 1-3 projects over 5 years for the St. Lawrence
Massena, Buffalo River, and/or the Rochester Embayment RAPs. The
submission(s) for such project(s) may request the cumulative total
amount needed for work that would be done over a 5 year period to
advance environmental protection by accelerating the process of
delisting and restoring beneficial use impairments through the
coordination, oversight, and management of one or more RAPs. If
selected, funds may be awarded incrementally each year up to
$100,000, depending on EPA funds availability and program needs and
priorities; EPA funding each year is not guaranteed. Following
selection, if EPA decides to make incremental award(s), applicants
would be asked to submit an annualized 5-year budget and budget
detail narrative for the project, and a detailed workplan covering
each of the 5 years. Please note that funds from this targeted
amount could be combined with a project described in 5 below. Each
project submission should address tasks associated with RAP
development and implementation, including:
- development of periodic RAP status reports that describe and
track remediation efforts aimed at eliminating beneficial use
impairments identified for applicable RAP(s) and moving the AOC(s)
towards delisting;
- organization of periodic meetings of the public advisory
committees and distribution of meeting minutes to participants and
State and Federal agencies;
- coordination of RAP activities with other Great Lakes programs
such as the LaMPs;
- coordination of RAPs with related organizations such as the
International Joint Commission (IJC), the Federal RAP Liaisons,
USEPA/GLNPO, and the Great Lakes Commission;
- participation and co-operation with USEPA (GLNPO and Regional
programs) and their agents on gathering, assessing, and summarizing
RAP progress;
- periodic re-evaluation of beneficial use impairments and
adjustment of remediation strategies and ecosystem restoration
efforts as necessary for the elimination of impairments and AOC
delisting; and
- other applicable activities described in paragraph1, 2, and 3
above.
Contact: Barbara Belasco (212) 637-3848,
belasco.barbara@epa.gov,
for additional information.
5. New York State AOC Delisting. An estimated amount of up to
$600,000 is targeted for approximately 1-6 projects over 5 years
combining some or all of the activities described in paragraph 1, 2,
3, and 4 above for projects that will either lead to, or
significantly contribute to, the delisting of New York State AOCs by
2010, the delisting target specified in EPA's Great Lakes Strategy
(see http://www.epa.gov/grtlakes/gls/index.html).
One such project would be an assessment of the Oswego River of the
restoration of fish habitat and population just below the Varick
Dam. The Varick Dam FERC re-license (November 2004) includes
requirements of minimum flows necessary for the restoration of water
in the area just below the dam in order to restore fish habitat and
population. The project submission may be for a 2 year budget and 2
year workplan to cover the seasons important for fish spawning and
population in 2006/2007. The project’s final output would be a
report describing if and when the fish habitat and populations are
present after the change in flow regime at the dam.
6. Habitat Beneficial Use Impairments. An estimated amount of up to
$250,000 is targeted for approximately 4-8 projects leading to
delisting of one of the three habitat-related beneficial use
impairments (BUIs)—Degraded Fish and Wildlife Populations, Loss of
Fish and Wildlife Habitat, Degradation of Benthos. Projects must be
collaborative partnerships that demonstrate common goals and
expected outcomes. Project activities must be based on an ecological
restoration approach and comprised of one or more of the following
steps in the pathway to delisting (see
http://www.glc.org/spac/pdf/FishWildlifeBUI.pdf for a draft
document, "Pathway for Delisting Three Beneficial Use Impairments in
Great Lakes Areas of Concern" detailing the pathway to delisting of
the three BUIs):
- Articulation of a vision and goals for all habitats within the AOC that is accepted by the community.
- An inventory and assessment of the plants, animals, and habitats
currently in the AOC, as well as the problems that are causing the
impairments to them and what is needed for them to recover.
- A project design (target setting) for the entire AOC, including a
detailed work plan to restore and manage all sites within the AOC as
articulated in a vision and goals.
- Implementation activities that will accomplish the goals and
objectives according to an articulated project design.
- Development of a monitoring and re-assessment plan that will keep
track of each protected or restored site within the AOC over a long
period of time.
Overall RAP Priorities Contact: Mark Elster (312) 886-3857,
elster.mark@epa.gov
________________________________________
* A cumulative total of up to $90,000 is targeted for 1-3 projects
in Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, and Wisconsin
pursuant to paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 of this Section I.D.
USEPA is requesting submissions for projects
which will further advance Lakewide Management Plan implementation
and development. An estimated amount of $852,000 is targeted for
approximately 12-29 projects.
USEPA has worked extensively with States, Tribes, and other partners
in development and implementation of the Lakewide Management Plans.
The updated Lakewide Management Plans are available at:
http://www.epa.gov/glnpo/gl2000/lamps/index.html.
Funding for some LaMP "program implementation awards for Great Lakes
States" is not included in this Funding Guidance pursuant to a
January 8, 2004 exemption from USEPA's Policy for Competition in
Assistance Agreements. USEPA has contacted the States separately to
discuss assistance pursuant to this exemption.
See previous sections of this Funding Guidance for additional
requests for projects supporting the LaMPs pertaining to Pollution
Prevention and Reduction, Habitat, and Emerging or Strategic Issues.
Each LaMP is different, requiring different funding mechanisms, not
all of which are included in the Funding Guidance. LaMP activities
are also supported by direct, non-competitive grants to States and
Tribes, interagency agreements with other Federal agencies, and
contractual funding.
Note that USEPA and Environment Canada have recently agreed to
better coordinate ship- and land-based monitoring efforts for the
Great Lakes. The objective of the coordination is to provide an
intensive field sampling campaign for each Lake every five years. In
2005, USEPA will focus efforts in Lake Michigan, and in 2006, USEPA
and Environment Canada will focus efforts on Lake Superior.
Intensive monitoring for Lakes Huron, Ontario, and Erie would be
done in 2007, 2008, and 2009, respectively.
Expected Environmental Outcomes/Outputs. Will include among the
following:
- Reduction of releases of targeted persistent toxic substances to
the Great Lakes basin.
- Protection, restoration and maintenance of high quality habitat in
the Great Lakes basin, and the ecosystem processes which sustain
them.
- A Great Lakes ecosystem which supports a diverse, healthy and
sustainable wildlife community in the Great Lakes basin.
- Preservation of human health in the Great Lakes ecosystem.
- Human use of the Great Lakes ecosystem should be consistent with
sustainability principles.
- Documented reductions in emissions of targeted critical pollutants
through improved emissions inventories, tracking and reporting.
- Development and use of indicators to assess and report on
ecosystem health.
- Progress toward improved indicators (i.e., increase in acres of
wetlands restored, number of fish species rehabilitated)
- A report documenting the number of people reached, conferences or
outreach meetings held to generate increased public awareness of
critical Great Lakes human health and ecosystem issues.
Projects of Particular Interest. USEPA staff and LaMP partners have
identified the following as Projects of Particular Interest:
1. Lake Erie LaMP Implementation projects. An estimated amount of
$70,000 is targeted for approximately 2-4 projects, including:
- LaMP Implementation through Lake Erie Forum Stakeholders. An
estimated amount of up to $50,000 is targeted for approximately 1-3
projects for which the focus is on the implementation of high
priority LaMP goals and commitments which will advance restoration
of impaired beneficial uses. Projects should include (i)
facilitation of the multi-stakeholder, multi-sectoral, bi-national
citizen group known as the Lake Erie Public Forum for the express
purposes of gaining public participation in the LaMP process and
increasing Forum and public participation in LaMP implementation
activities and (ii) educational outreach using vehicles such as
newsletters, web sites, and list serves.
- Lake St. Clair Implementation Strategy. An estimated amount of up
to $20,000 is targeted for a project which would develop an
implementation strategy for the Lake St. Clair Management Plan <http://www.lre.usace.army.mil/projectsandstudies/planningstudies/comprehensive%20management%20plan/index.cfm?>.
Contact: Rosanne Ellison (734) 692-7689,
ellison.rosanne@epa.gov
Lake Erie Contact: Daniel O'Riordan (312) 886-7981,
oriordan.daniel@epa.gov
The LaMP is at:
http://www.epa.gov/glnpo/erie.html
2. Lake Huron Basin “Protection and Restoration of Beneficial Uses”
Projects totaling up to an estimated amount of $100,000 targeting
approximately 1-4 projects that (i) support domestic U.S. progress
toward priorities established by the Lake Huron Binational
Partnership in areas outside of Areas of Concern and (ii) establish
or strengthen local partnerships by joint on-the-ground efforts
that:
- restore fish and wildlife communities and their habitat (e.g.,
stream and shoreline restoration, fish passage/dam removal, etc.),
and/or
- protect existing ecologically rich areas from future degradation.
Lake Huron projects must:
- Identify the Lake Huron Binational Partnership priority addressed.
- Describe involvement and coordination with local communities,
organizations, and agencies. (Applicants will be asked to document
support from the involved organization before an award will be
issued.)
- Include as the expected environmental outcome matters such as
acres of restored habitat and expected size of restored populations.
Both restoration and protection projects should describe how
resources will continue to be protected after the project ends
(e.g., ongoing stewardship groups, volunteer monitoring/clean-ups,
easements, zoning changes, etc.).
Contact: James Schardt (312) 353-5085,
schardt.james@epa.gov. The
Lake Huron Binational Partnership is at:
http://www.epa.gov/glnpo/huron.html.
3. Lake Michigan LaMP Implementation. An estimated amount of
$105,000 is targeted for approximately 1-3 projects, including:
- LaMP Implementation through Lake Michigan Forum Stakeholders. An
estimated amount of $75,000 is targeted for approximately 1-3
projects the focus for which is the implementation of high priority LaMP goals and commitments which will advance restoration of
impaired beneficial uses. Projects should include (i) facilitation
of the multi-stakeholder, multi-sectoral, citizen group known as the
Lake Michigan Forum for the express purposes of gaining public
participation in the LaMP process and increasing Forum and public
participation in LaMP implementation activities and (ii) educational
outreach using vehicles such as newsletters, web sites, and list
serves.
- LaMP Implementation through Monitoring Coordination. An estimated
amount of $30,000 is targeted for a project to enhance Lake Michigan
coordination, communication, and data management among agencies and
other organizations that conduct or benefit from monitoring efforts
in support of the Lake Michigan Lakewide Management Plan. The
project should include facilitation of the multi-stakeholder,
multi-sectoral, multi-agency group known as the Lake Michigan
Monitoring Coordination Council.
Contact: Judy Beck (312) 353-3849,
beck.judy@epa.gov. The LaMP is
at: http://www.epa.gov/glnpo/michigan.html.
4. Lake Ontario LaMP Implementation Projects.
- Lake Ontario Contaminant Source Trackdown. An estimated amount of
up to $80,000 is targeted for approximately 1-3 projects. Sampling
and analysis related to tracking down the sources of pollutants
identified in the Lake Ontario LaMP Status Report 2004, Chapter 6,
"Sources & Loads of Critical Pollutants" (see
http://www.epa.gov/glnpo/lakeont/2004update/index.html) or in an
AOC or non-AOC area in the Lake Ontario basin. Of particular
interest is the trackdown of sources of PCBs in 18 Mile Creek and
Rochester AOCs.
- Lake Ontario PCB TMDL Development. An estimated amount of up to
$100,000 is targeted for 1 project that will provide the technical
support necessary to assist New York State Department of
Environmental Conservation in the development of a lakewide TMDL for
PCBs in Lake Ontario. This support is expected to include the
following:
- The analysis and modeling, as needed, of existing and readily
available data and information. US EPA Region 2 and GLNPO have
supported the development of a hydrophobic organic chemical mass
balance and food chain bioaccumulation model, LOTOX2, for Lake
Ontario. LOTOX2 has been calibrated and peer reviewed for total
PCBs; the model code, the model documentation, and the peer review
report can be obtained from US EPA Region 2.
- The development of reports that the State of New York may use to
support TMDL development, including the following regulatory
requirements:
- Identification of waterbody, the pollutant of concern, pollutant
sources, and priority ranking.
- Description of the applicable water quality standards and
numeric water quality target.
- Loading capacity, cause and effect relationship between numeric
target and pollutant, and critical condition(s).
- Load allocations
- Wasteload allocations
- Margin of safety
- Seasonal variation
- Reasonable assurance
- Index of the administrative record
- The development of additional supporting information:
- A system of environmental indicators to measure progress in
terms of desires outcomes;
- Actions to be implemented by other stakeholders; and
- Data needs recommended for collection of new data and
information.
- Lake Ontario Tributary Load Monitoring. An estimated amount of up
to $100,000 is targeted for approximately1-4 projects. To support
the Lake Ontario mass balance model and to bring needed data to the
Lake Ontario LaMP, information on tributary loadings from the
Oswego, Genessee and Salmon Rivers and 18 Mile Creek is needed for 6
critical Lake Ontario pollutants ( PCBs, Hg, dieldrin, DDT, mirex,
dioxins/furans). Monitoring projects may include:
- the development of monitoring plans;
- seasonal monitoring of Lake Ontario critical pollutants and
tributary flows; and,
- the calculation of seasonal and annual loadings of Lake Ontario
critical pollutants.
- Development of Lake Ontario Habitat Indicators. An estimated
amount of up to $50,000 is targeted for 1-2 projects. The Lake
Ontario LaMP has adopted eleven ecosystem indicators thus far (see
http://www.epa.gov/glnpo/lakeont/2004update/index.html). The LaMP
is interested in adopting additional indicators for habitat, for
example, a coastal wetlands indicator. The indicators proposed need
to be those for which a monitoring program is currently in place by
an organization, so that past, current and future data will be
available to the LaMP. The project should take maximum advantage of
existing data, reports and studies; indicate the support of agencies
or organizations involved in the relevant monitoring programs; and
should include a public outreach component to inform/obtain comments
from the public on the proposed indicators.
- Mitigating Impacts of Lake Ontario Lake-Level Controls. An
estimated amount of up to $50,000 is targeted for 1-2 projects.
Develop feasibility study to implement projects to mitigate the
impacts that artificial lake level controls have had on New York
State coastal wetlands. Projects would evaluate the use of weirs or
other approaches to restore the functionality of coastal wetlands
that have been altered due to the decreased range of water levels
experienced since lake level controls were put in place. Projects
should have strong local government support and involve government
environmental and natural resource agencies. The emphasis should be
on project implementation. The final project deliverable will
provide an assessment of the impacts and benefits related to the
mitigation project as well as a detailed workplan and budget.
Contact: Barbara Belasco (212) 637-3848,
belasco.barbara@epa.gov.
The LaMP is at: http://www.epa.gov/glnpo/ontario.html.
5. Lake Superior LaMP Implementation projects. An estimated amount
of $197,000 is targeted for approximately 3-5 projects.
- LaMP Implementation through Forum Stakeholders. An estimated
amount of $75,000 is targeted for approximately 1-2 projects to
implement high priority LaMP goals and commitments which will
advance restoration of impaired beneficial uses such as the
basinwide Mercury project, including the development of peer-to-peer
program advising; human health outreach efforts; outreach on AOCs,
and participation in monitoring efforts. Binational participation is
required. Projects should include facilitation of multi-stakeholder,
multi-sectoral, citizen's groups or fora; public meetings held
around the Basin for the express purpose of educating/ outreaching
on specific issues of interest to the Lake stakeholder community;
and other outreach such as newsletters, web sites, and e-mail lists.
- Tribal LaMP Implementation. An estimated amount of $82,000 is
targeted for approximately 1-2 projects for LaMP implementation and
coordination on behalf of Lake Superior Tribal interests, with
emphasis on addressing LaMP commitments for reduction of critical
pollutants, and implementing top habitat, terrestrial, and aquatics
commitments of the LaMP. Projects should include active Tribal
technical coordinating committee representation and participation;
updating of websites; fish monitoring and assessment, tracking and
updating of LaMP and RAP progress; RAP liaison work, and
coordination of LaMP or RAP related monitoring.
- Monitoring Energy Transfer. An estimated amount of $40,000 is
targeted for a project to support the Lake Superior Binational
Program lake-wide effort to develop a monitoring program for
benthos, phytoplankton, zooplankton, Mysis and Diporeia. Project
should describe the energy transfer from these plants and animals to
top fish predators.
Contact: Elizabeth LaPlante (312) 353-2694,
laplante.elizabeth@epa.gov. The LaMP is at:
http://www.epa.gov/glnpo/lakesuperior/index.html.
|