|
 |
Great
Lakes Pollution Prevention
Pollution Solutions
Promoting Polluting Prevention in the Great Lakes Basin
A Report on the Pollution Prevention Grant Program in
the Great Lakes Basin
From 1992 through 1995, the Great Lakes National Program
Office (GLNPO) of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) awarded over
$1,600,000 in grants for 20 on-the-ground pollution prevention activities. We have
supported 11 organizations promoting pollution prevention as the preferred way of doing
business in the Great Lakes basin from Duluth, Minnesota to Rochester, New York.
The Federal grant funds invested in pollution prevention projects in the basin have
attracted over $950,000 additional dollars to further advance the projects. Recipients of
Federal grants are required to provide a 5% match to their grant awards (either money or
in-kind services). Notably, GLNPO pollution prevention grantees have leveraged an
impressive 61% cumulative match for the projects funded from 1992 through 1995.
The seed money invested by GLNPO spurred a number of innovative projects which have
influenced activities across the nation. Examples of these projects include: the Auto
Project which targeted reduction of persistent toxic substances; the Great Printers
Project, which reached out to an industry composed of predominantly small businesses to
turn pollution prevention into the preferred way of doing business; and Western Lake
Superior Sanitary District's pollution prevention efforts to protect Lake Superior.
With the help of our grantees, a great deal has been learned about using pollution
prevention as a tool to address current problems and avoid future ones in the Great Lakes
basin. Lessons learned include the following:
- Pollution prevention is an important voluntary tool which companies can use to minimize
their wastes and save money.
- Regulatory compliance is a strong motivator to initiate consideration of pollution
prevention solutions.
- A recipe for project success includes strong public/private partnerships involving local
entities.
- It is relatively easy to measure the programmatic success of pollution prevention
activities, such as number of companies
assessed or fact sheets distributed.
- Extrapolating the quantity of pollution prevented as a direct result of a specific
project is much more difficult.
This report serves as a road map to the pollution prevention activities supported by
GLNPO and will hopefully spur ideas for new projects. GLNPO summarized the most recent
information about each project in a descriptive narrative and compiled the descriptions
into a "catalog" (Appendix A). The project descriptions contain the phone
numbers and/or E-mail addresses of the project contacts. These are the persons who served
as the project directors promoting pollution prevention in the Great Lakes basin. They are
important and valuable resources for future activities. Appendix B contains a list of
projects funded by GLNPO in Fiscal Year (FY) 1997. (Note that in FY 1996, since a budget
was not passed until mid-year, the GLNPO pollution prevention grant process was
suspended.) Appendix C explains GLNPO's grants process.
Background
The Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement (GLWQA) calls for the "virtual
elimination" of persistent toxic substances from the Great Lakes basin. The purpose
of the 1978 Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement, as amended, is to "restore and
maintain the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the waters of the Great Lakes
basin ecosystem." Since the late 1980's, pollution prevention has been the
cornerstone of the Great Lakes programs. GLNPO has supported many pollution prevention
activities, specifically to advance the GLWQA's goal of virtually eliminating the
discharge of persistent toxic substances into the Great Lakes basin.
The Great Lakes Binational Toxics Strategy, signed on April 7, 1997, by U.S. EPA
Administrator Carol Browner and Canadian Minister of the Environment Sergio Marchi,
addresses that commitment. The Strategy calls for percentage reductions in targeted
substances within a ten-year time frame -- tangible steps along the path to virtual
elimination. The Strategy sets reduction targets for an initial list of substances
including mercury, PCBs, DDT, chlordane, and dioxins/furans. This is the first time that a
common list of substances has been targeted jointly for reductions by both the U.S. and
Canada. Although levels of these substances have been decreasing in recent years, these
substances still exist in the Great Lakes at amounts harmful to human and wildlife health.
They also are the cause of fish advisories. Pollution prevention is the preferred method
to address the problem substances which are currently being manufactured or used.
The Great Lakes Binational Toxics Strategy builds upon a tradition of pollution
prevention activities in the Great Lakes basin. In the Great Lakes, pollution prevention
efforts coalesced in the U.S. EPA's Great Lakes Pollution Prevention Action Plan.
Announced by then U.S. EPA Administrator William Reilly and the Great Lakes governors on
April 12, 1991, the action plan served as a snapshot of ongoing activities and launched a
number of new activities. These included the Great Lakes Auto Project and coordinated
pollution prevention efforts to protect the Lake Superior ecosystem.
On September 30, 1991, the U.S. EPA, Environment Canada, the States of Michigan,
Minnesota and Wisconsin, and the Province of Ontario announced the "Binational
Program to Protect and Restore the Lake Superior Basin." The Binational Program zero
discharge demonstration program is devoted to the goal of achieving zero discharge or
emission of nine designated persistent toxic substances through pollution prevention,
enhanced regulatory measures, and remedial programs. Federal, State, Tribal and local
government and non-profit partners use
Lakewide Management Plans to help address the
environmental problems for each specific lake basin. Remedial Action Plans help identify
the solutions for the 42 toxic hotspot Areas of Concern.
On the national level, the Pollution Prevention Act of 1990 provided support for
pollution prevention activities. Congress declared as national policy that pollution
should be prevented or reduced at the source whenever feasible; pollution that cannot be
prevented should be recycled. If pollution cannot be prevented or recycled, it should be
treated in an environmentally safe manner. Disposal or other release into the environment
should be used as a last resort. Pollution prevention and source reduction are terms used
interchangeably. Source reduction is defined as any practice which reduces the amount of
any hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant entering any waste stream or otherwise
released into the environment prior to recycling, treatment or disposal.
Great Lakes as a Pollution
Prevention Leader
As pollution prevention was gaining acceptance and momentum across the nation, several
pollution prevention practitioners in the Great Lakes basin were establishing themselves
as leaders in the field. These practitioners meet twice each year at the
Great Lakes
Regional Pollution Prevention Roundtable (GLRPPR)
to share information and learn from each
other. This group started in 1990 with the U.S. EPA Region 5 States (Illinois, Indiana,
Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio and Wisconsin), meeting to share experiences. The GLRPPR has
grown to an international organization with active participants from both U.S. and
Canadian portions of the Great Lakes basin. Currently, membership includes about 160
organizations and 345 individuals from the Great Lakes States and Ontario. Organizations
represented include State and local environmental agencies, business development agencies,
industry and associations, labor unions, environmental advocacy groups, nonprofit research
centers, academia, technical assistance providers and Federal agency programs with a Great
Lakes and pollution prevention focus.
The GLNPO Pollution Prevention Grant Assistance
Program
From 1992 through 1995, GLNPO awarded over $1,600,000 in grants for 20 on-the-ground
pollution prevention activities. We have supported 11 organizations promoting pollution
prevention as the preferred way of doing business in the Great Lakes basin. Projects
covered areas ranging from Duluth, Minnesota to Rochester, New York.
These Federal investments in pollution prevention projects in the basin have attracted
over $950,000 additional dollars to further advance the projects.
Recipients of Federal grants are required to provide a 5% match to their grant awards
(either money or in-kind services). GLNPO's grantees have leveraged a cumulative 61% match
from 1992 through 1995. This ability to attract matching funds reaffirms the quality of
the projects supported in the basin.
The seed money invested by GLNPO spurred a number of innovative projects which have
influenced activities across the nation. The Auto Project has expanded from a Great Lakes
basin focus to targeting persistent toxic substances and other materials in the auto
sector across the United States. Excluding zinc releases, the Auto Project achieved a
54.5% production normalized reduction of Great Lakes Persistent Toxics since 1991. The
Great Printers Project is a unique project, working with an industry composed of
predominantly small businesses to make pollution prevention the preferred way of doing
business. The Great Printers Project
has been endorsed by the governors of the Great Lakes
States and the Administrator of U.S. EPA. Western Lake Superior Sanitary District's
efforts to reduce mercury through pollution prevention have earned national recognition.
Pollution prevention is becoming the approach of choice in the Great Lakes basin. It is
being embraced by large and small industries, and households as well. It is an important
tool for cleaning up heavily industrialized areas as well as protecting pristine areas
such as the Lake Superior basin.
The GLNPO pollution prevention grant assistance program in the Great Lakes basin has
evolved over the years from funding general pollution prevention technical assistance to
supporting activities to reduce persistent toxic substances of concern, with a special
emphasis on mercury. Initial efforts helped build the infrastructure for pollution
prevention technical assistance in the basin. Many small and medium-sized companies were
not aware of pollution prevention, and GLNPO invested its money to help "get the word
out." In FY93 Congress allocated money to promote pollution prevention in the Lake
Superior basin. In an innovative approach, grantees from Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin
coordinated their efforts to ensure that individual projects positively affect the Lake
Superior ecosystem in all three States. Projects funded in FY94 focused on promoting
pollution prevention to specific businesses, such as the automotive industry and printers.
Projects funded in FY95 all supported pollution prevention efforts aimed at reduction of
mercury. Of these projects, three out of the four targeted reduction of mercury in
hospitals. These complementary projects were implemented across the entire basin (Duluth,
Minnesota; Southeast Michigan; and Rochester, New York), and the grantees shared
information as the projects progressed.
By funding these and other projects, GLNPO furthered the march towards virtual
elimination of persistent toxics in the Great Lakes basin. We helped build the network of
environmental professionals promoting pollution prevention so that pollution prevention
will be the preferred approach for environmental protection in the basin. Our strategic
use of funds is helping to focus pollution prevention efforts to reduce persistent
bioaccumulative toxic substances in the Great Lakes basin.
This report covers projects funded by GLNPO in Federal fiscal years 1992 - 1995. (The
Federal fiscal year runs from October 1 through September 30 of the following year.)
Summaries of these projects appear in Appendix A. In FY 1996, due to a mid-year budget
agreement, the GLNPO pollution prevention grant process was suspended. Project funding
resumed in Federal fiscal year 1997, with the latest round of projects funded in September
1997. See Appendix B for a list of projects funded in FY 1997 and
Appendix C for
information on GLNPO's funding guidance and grants process.
In addition to GLNPO, there are a number of other funding sources, from other
government offices to private foundations, supporting pollution prevention projects in the
Great Lakes basin. These organizations informally communicate about their programs to
ensure coordination of the projects funded.
Lessons Learned
With the help of our grantees, a great deal has been learned about using pollution
prevention to address current problems and avoid future ones in the Great Lakes basin.
These lessons include:
- Pollution prevention is an important voluntary tool which companies can use to minimize
their wastes. However, regulatory compliance is a strong motivator for companies to become
interested in pollution prevention technical assistance. In an effort to comply with
regulations, companies will consider pollution prevention solutions.
- Generally, companies do not want to consider reducing only one or two targeted
pollutants, but rather look at their business processes more holistically. As a result of
this practice, projects targeting these specific pollutants may have unanticipated
additional environmental benefits.
- Successful projects include strong public/private partnerships involving local entities.
This component should be incorporated into future projects where appropriate.
- It is relatively easy to measure programmatic success of pollution prevention
activities, such as the number of companies assessed, or fact sheets distributed.
Extrapolating how much pollution was not created as a direct result of a specific
pollution prevention project is much more difficult. We do know that companies can save
money and reduce their impact on the environment by employing pollution prevention
techniques.
- Prevention is a key part of the pollution solution.
OVERVIEW OF POLLUTION PREVENTION PROJECTS, FEDERAL FISCAL YEARS 1992 - 1995
|
Table 1:
Number of New Projects, Total Dollar Amounts and Dollars Leveraged for GLNPO Pollution Prevention Grant Assistance, Fiscal Years 1992 - 1995. |
Fiscal
Year |
Number of
Grants |
GLNPO
Dollars |
Dollars
Leveraged |
| 1992 |
2 |
$200,000 |
$10,105 |
| 1993 |
6 |
$547,000 |
$28,960 |
| 1994 |
8 |
$628,000 |
$360,402 |
| 1995 |
4 |
$237,000 |
$576,866 |
|
TOTAL |
20 |
$1,612,715 |
$976,333 |
|
Table 2:
Agencies and Organizations Receiving Fiscal Years 1992 - 1995 Grant Assistance Dollars from GLNPO, and Basins Impacted by Projects. |
| Organization |
Number of
Projects |
Basin |
| Center for Neighborhood Technology |
2 |
Michigan |
| Chicago Legal Clinic 1 Michigan |
1 |
Michigan |
| Council of Great Lakes Governors |
1 |
All |
| Erie County Dept. of Environment & Planning |
3 |
Erie |
| Michigan Dept. of Environmental Quality |
3 |
All, Superior |
| Minnesota Pollution Control Agency |
3 |
Superior |
| Monroe County Dept. of Health |
1 |
Ontario |
| National Wildlife Federation |
1 |
Erie |
| Ohio Environmental Protection Agency |
1 |
Erie |
| Western Lake Superior Sanitary District 2 Superior |
2 |
Superior |
|
University of Wisconsin, Cooperative Extension, 2 Michigan,
Superior Solid and Hazardous Waste Education Center |
2 |
Michigan, Superior |
|
Table 3: GLNPO Funded Pollution Prevention Projects
and Dollars by Great Lakes Basin During Fiscal Years 1992 - 1995. |
| Basin |
Number of
Projects |
GLNPO
Dollars |
Dollars
Leveraged |
| Erie |
8 |
$323,927 |
$104,574 |
| Huron |
2 |
$27,577 |
$10,348 |
| Michigan |
6 |
$373,043 |
$256,127 |
| Ontario |
3 |
$88,577 |
$44,448 |
| Superior |
11 |
$799,591 |
$560,837 |
* Note that some projects
funded during FY 1992 - 1995 impacted more than one lake basin and are counted multiple
times. These multiple basin projects are represented in the Dollar columns by the estimated
proportion of funds spent in each basin |
The Great Lakes basin has a network of informed and motivated businesses, non-profit
organizations, universities and government agencies promoting and implementing pollution
prevention in the basin. The best indication of the level of pollution prevention
expertise is the caliber of projects which have been implemented around the basin.
Summaries of the projects funded under GLNPO's grant program are contained in
Appendix A
of this report.
Along with these summaries are descriptions of products developed under the various
grants and information on how to contact the individuals who worked directly on the
projects. It is our hope that this information will further strengthen the network of
individuals who are working to promote pollution prevention around the Great Lakes basin.
These projects, and the persons who worked on them, should be viewed as resources for
future activities.
Access our World Wide Web site at:
http://www.epa.gov/glnpo/
on the Internet for
information on GLNPO's pollution prevention efforts in the Great Lakes basin. This report
will be available on the Internet site in early 1998. We will provide hotlinks to the
project contacts and applicable reports mentioned in the grant summaries. If you have any
comments on GLNPO's pollution prevention grant program, or if you have ideas about
additional areas we should explore for investing our funds, we would love to hear from
you.
Please contact:
Danielle Green, Environmental Protection Specialist
Tel: (312) 886-7594
Fax: (312) 353-2018
E-mail: green.danielle@epa.gov
Elizabeth LaPlante, Pollution Prevention Team Leader
Tel: (312) 353-2694
Fax: (312) 353-2018
E-mail: laplante.elizabeth@epa.gov
or contact any of the grantees listed in the project summaries.
For additional copies of this document, please contact:
Mr. Lawrence Brail, ADS [contractor]
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Great Lakes National Program Office
77 West Jackson Boulevard (G-17J)
Chicago, Illinois 60604
Tel: (312) 886-7474
Fax:
(312) 353-2018
E-mail: brail.lawrence@epamail.epa.gov
|