Invasive Species
The Effect of Zebra Mussels on Cycling and Potential
Bioavailability of PCBs: Case Study of Saginaw Bay
FINAL COPY
SECTION 6
6.1
CONCLUSIONS and Recommendations

A screening-level multi-stressor aquatic ecosystem modeling framework was
developed, incorporating numerous processes, interactions, and feedbacks
present in the Saginaw Bay ecosystem. The model included hydrology,
hydraulic transport, nutrient dynamics, multi-class phytoplankton growth
and succession, zebra mussel growth and dynamics, particulate matter
processing and cycling by mussels,
∑PCB
It is envisaged that the integrated screening-level model comprising of
europhication and fate and transport of
∑PCB
The following conclusions can be drawn based on the model results:
- The invasion of zebra mussels has led to a re-direction of the energy and nutrients from the pelagic food chain to the benthic food chain through enhanced removal of particles from the water column to the sediments. This additional particle flux has resulted in an increase in ∑PCB flux to the sediments. By this, a portion of the contaminant inventory has been transferred to the sediments. Assuming a constant load of ∑PCBs to the system, the ∑PCB concentrations in the sediments were higher than those in the absence of zebra mussels.
-
The most differential buildup of ∑PCBs
in sediments was in the near shore area of the bay due to high mussel
densities and location in the path of Saginaw River inflow, which is
the major source of ∑PCBs
to the Bay.
-
The introduction of zebra mussels did not lead to an increased
biomagnification of ∑PCBs
in lower pelagic food chain with two trophic levels; phytoplankton,
herbivorous zooplankton, and carnivorous zooplankton. The shift in
bioaccumulation pattern in the presence of mussels depends on various
ecosystem interactions and feedbacks in the system. A key
consideration in assessing the impacts of mussels on bioaccumulation
was the filtering activities of mussels on different types of
suspended particles. Zebra mussel filtration on blue greens algae and
rejection on herbivorous zooplankton did result in incremental
∑PCB
bioaccumulation in pelagic lower food chain.
-
The high ∑PCB
level in zebra mussels in segments where
∑PCB
concentrations were high showed that zebra mussels closely track the
environmental conditions. The highest ∑PCB
concentration in zebra mussels was found near the mouth of the Saginaw
River (i.e., in segment 1). This highlights the use of mussels as
biomonitors of contaminants.
-
The ∑PCB
concentrations in water column and zebra mussels were influenced by
the circulation pattern of the Saginaw River plume, which has resulted
in a reduction in concentration for the segments away from the Saginaw
River mouth.
-
The total water column ∑PCB
concentration was directly proportional to Log Kow, whereas
dissolved ∑PCB concentration was
inversely proportional to Log Kow.
-
∑PCB body burden of zebra mussels
is a function of Log Kow since efficiency of chemical
uptake, chemical dietary assimilation efficiency, and the
elimination rates are function of Log Kow.
∑PCB concentration in zebra
mussels was directly proportional to Log Kow.
-
The total water column ∑PCB
concentration was directly proportional to external
∑PCB
loadings and was not strongly dependent on zebra mussel densities,
although a small decline in water column concentration occurred in
presence of mussels.
-
∑PCB
body burden of zebra mussels was directly proportional to external
∑PCB
loadings and inversely proportional to mussel densities.
-
In response to external phosphorus loadings, it was found that
the total water and sediment ∑PCB
concentration were directly proportional, whereas dissolved water and
∑PCB
concentration in phyptoplankton were inversely proportional.
-
Responses to changes in external phosphorus loadings, PCB
loadings and zebra mussel densities were greater in near shore zone
than in the open water.
-
Sensitivity analysis of the selected model parameters indicated
that Log Kow and lipid content were quite sensitive for
∑PCB
concentration in Dreissena. ∑PCB
body burden of zebra mussels was directly proportional to lipid
content of the mussels. ∑PCB
body burden of larger, adult zebra mussels was higher than smaller,
juvenile mussels.
-
The sensitivity of model output to external loads indicated
that it is important to account for different nutrient loading on
∑PCB
dynamics because nutrients impact the phytoplankton biomass, which in
turn controls the ∑PCB
dynamics in the system.
- This is not a predictive model. This model is not intended to predict, but is mainly an heuristic exercise to evaluate the fate and transport of ∑PCBs with the introduction of mussels. This work helps in understanding the changes that occurred in the network of processes with the introduction of zebra mussels in the system, which is essential in elucidating the factors important for determining the fate and transport of contaminants in aquatic systems. This modeling effort will help guide our understanding of bioaccumulation of contaminants in fish, which is a concern for human and ecosystem health.
-
The combination of parameters for the bioaccumulation model is
based on limited data available in literature. The screening level
concentration predictions in various compartments of the model may not be
unreasonable even with the present formulation of model based on limited
data, but it did not allow parameter calibration. Formal calibration of
model results with the required field data is needed.
-
The cycling of contaminants to benthic feeders and the associated
food chain accumulation as a result of mussel activities and enhanced
deposition should be evaluated. Field data should be collected on
contaminant concentration in benthic invertebrates, which feed on zebra
mussel feces and pseudofeces. The coupling between the pelagic and benthic
food chain might lead to funneling of contaminants into the higher trophic
levels via benthic pathway.
-
Field measurements on ∑PCB
concentration in the lower food web such as in phytoplankton and
zooplankton species are required in order to compare the model
predictions.
-
Additional studies on chemical accumulation and bioprocessing of
different types of solids are required to account for their relevant
effects on body burden of mussels and their transport in the sediments.
Specifically, the processing of ∑PCBs
associated with different types of solids need special attention to verify
the model results.
-
In order to assess their potential as indicators, it is necessary
to monitor the concentration of ∑PCBs
in waters and mussels at various times of the year and over a spectrum of
contamination.
-
The fraction of an individual’s total mass comprised of lipid can
vary among individuals over more than an order of magnitude, so a detailed
study on lipid contents of species as a function of season, reproduction,
and food availability is required. Additional studies on change in lipid
contents of mussel with growth and reproduction should be carried out. The
change in lipid weight as a function of time should be considered in the
model formulation.
-
For the present study, a regression of chemical assimilation
efficiency depending on Kow for one age group of mussels was
used. The extension of this regression for other age classes may be
questionable. So more studies on toxicokinetics factors of different age
classes would improve the resolution of model results.
-
The development of zebra mussel bioenergetics and bioaccumulation
model was based on empirical and laboratory data. The validation of those
parameters to field data should be ascertained.
- The model predictions were based on the actual time series of forcing functions for the 1991 calibration year. A sensitivity analysis by settling ∑PCB and phosphorus loads with ¡ 50% values of 1991, while keeping all other parameters at the base values of 1991, showed the importance of these forcing functions. So, in order to investigate the differences between and among individual years in actual contaminant conditions in the system, a complete data set on forcing functions of each year is required.
6.1.3 Model Limitations
![]()
A number of limitations in present model formulation that may impact the ∑PCB dynamics in the system are the following:
-
The filtration of zebra mussels on different types of particles has
affected the ∑PCB
accumulation in the pelagic lower food chain. A pivotal question that
remains to be answered is the impact of zebra mussel on bioaccumulation in
top predator fish like walleye, where concentration are not only impacted
by pelagic food chain but also by benthic food chain. To answer this, a
complete food web model comprising of both benthic and pelagic
interactions is required. Since the introduction of mussels has resulted
in elevated levels of ∑PCBs
in the sediment and has increased the bioaccumulation potential in the
benthic food web. Also, the feeding and burrowing activities of benthic
feeders can play an important role for cycling the sediment contaminants.
This may result in an increase in the bioaccumulation in the pelagic food
web due to linkages of benthic species with the pelagic food web.
-
The developed model is capable of predicting the
∑PCB
body burden of zebra mussels based on ∑PCB
concentration in the water and food of the mussels. However, the model is
unable to differentiate the food value for assimilation of
∑PCBs
of different phytoplankton groups and zooplankton.
-
The importance of lipid content suggests the possibility that the
∑PCB
concentration in zebra mussels is directly proportional to lipid contents
of the mussels. It is reported in the literature that lipid content of
mussels varies with season and size, at present the model does not account
for it.
-
There is not yet a good understanding of zebra mussel food
processing capabilities on different types of phytoplankton groups. Since
the lipid content of phytoplankton groups differ so the inter-specific
differences in phytoplankton lipid content can influence the chemical
accumulation.
-
Since the actual time series of forcing functions were available
only for the 1991 calibration year, the model could not be used to
investigate the differences between and among individual years.
- By removing the phytoplankton from water column, zebra mussels remove the food source of microscopic zooplankton, which in turn are the food for larval and juvenile fishes and other-plankton feeding forage fish. The depletion of food sources of forage fish impacts the sport and commercial fisheries. The developed framework does not include the changes mediated by zebra mussel invasion in higher trophic levels.
![[logo] US EPA](http://www.epa.gov/epafiles/images/logo_epaseal.gif)