EPA Facility Water Management Progress
EPA has 27 signed water management plans covering 30 of its reporting facilities. The Agency continues to make water management a priority by revisiting and updating older water management plans and incorporating water conservation strategies at its facilities. This matrix shows water use in fiscal year (FY) 2010 compared to average water use from FY 2005 to FY 2009 for each facility covered by a water management plan. It also lists each best management practice (BMP) implemented at each facility according to the facility's most recent water management plan. Learn more about EPA's water management plans.
| Facility | Water Use (gallons/year) | BMPs1 Instituted |
|---|---|---|
| Ada, Oklahoma - Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Center | FY 2010: 3,392,827 FY 2005 to FY 2009 Average: 3,674,050 |
|
| Ann Arbor, Michigan - National Vehicle and Fuel Emissions Laboratory | FY 2010: 5,583,460 FY 2005 to FY 2009 Average: 6,707,045 |
|
| Athens, Georgia - National Exposure Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development (ORD) | FY 2010: 1,351,281 FY 2005 to FY 2009 Average: 3,529,191 |
|
| Athens, Georgia - Science and Ecosystem Support Division Laboratory | FY 2010: 2,517,120 FY 2005 to FY 2009 Average: 3,644,186 |
|
| Chelmsford, Massachusetts - New England Regional Laboratory | FY 2010: 1,688,900 FY 2005 to FY 2009 Average: 1,436,910 |
|
| Cincinnati, Ohio - Andrew W. Breidenbach Environmental Research Center (AWBERC)2 | FY 2010: 26,244,552 FY 2005 to FY 2009 Average: 27,885,752 |
|
| Cincinnati, Ohio - Center Hill Facility | FY 2010: 538,523 FY 2005 to FY 2009 Average: 1,127,150 |
|
| Cincinnati, Ohio - Child Care Facility2 | FY 2010: 122,681 FY 2005 to FY 2009 Average: 208,288 |
|
| Testing and Evaluation Center - Cincinnati, Ohio | FY 2010: 10,041,102 FY 2005 to FY 2009 Average: 17,159,979 |
|
| Corvallis, Oregon - Western Ecology Division Laboratory | FY 2010: 3,336,312 FY 2005 to FY 2009 Average: 5,087,805 |
|
| Corvallis, Oregon - Willamette Research Station | FY 2010: 320,914 FY 2005 to FY 2009 Average: 209,006 |
|
| Duluth, Minnesota - Mid-Continent Ecology Division Laboratory | FY 2010: 884,197 FY 2005 to FY 2009 Average: 1,056,999 |
|
| Edison, New Jersey - Region 2 Laboratory3 | FY 2010: 4,370,564 FY 2005 to FY 2009 Average: 4,943,086 |
|
| Fort Meade, Maryland - Environmental Science Center | FY 2010: 3,820,000 FY 2005 to FY 2009 Average: 5,472,800 |
|
| Golden, Colorado - Region 8 Laboratory | FY 2010: 2,293,000 FY 2005 to FY 2009 Average: 3,329,400 |
|
| Grosse Ile, Michigan - Large Lakes Research Station | FY 2010: 683,000 FY 2005 to FY 2009 Average: 619,000 |
|
| Gulf Breeze, Florida - Gulf Ecology Division Laboratory | FY 2010: 7,183,520 FY 2005 to FY 2009 Average: 6,951,474 |
|
| Houston, Texas - Region 6 Laboratory | FY 2010: 3,721,000 FY 2005 to FY 2009 Average: 3,468,800 |
|
| Kansas City, Kansas - Science and Technology Center | FY 2010: 2,413,964 FY 2005 to FY 2009 Average: 3,063,722 |
|
| Las Vegas, Nevada - National Exposure Research Laboratory and Radiation and Indoor Environments National Laboratory | FY 2010: 1,704,975 FY 2005 to FY 2009 Average: 2,278,181 |
|
| Manchester, Washington - Region 10 Laboratory | FY 2010: 650,873 FY 2005 to FY 2009 Average: 868,488 |
|
| Montgomery, Alabama - National Air and Radiation Environmental Laboratory4 | FY 2010: 4,639,350 FY 2006 to FY 2009 Average: 4,498,838 |
|
| Narragansett, Rhode Island - Atlantic Ecology Division Laboratory | FY 2010: 1,307,595 FY 2005 to FY 2009 Average: 2,808,039 |
|
| Newport, Oregon - Pacific Coastal Ecology Branch Laboratory | FY 2010: 259,000 FY 2005 to FY 2009 Average: 1,019,600 |
|
| Research Triangle Park (RTP), North Carolina - First Environments Early Learning Center5 | FY 2010: 485,133 FY 2007 to FY 2009 Average:6 438,479 |
|
| RTP, North Carolina - Main5 |
FY 2010: 10,879,904 FY 2007 to FY 2009 Average:6,7 17,810,188 |
|
| RTP, North Carolina - National Computer Center (NCC)5 |
FY 2010: 384,277 FY 2007 to FY 2009 Average:6,7 417,572 |
|
| RTP, North Carolina - National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory (NHEERL) / Reproductive Toxicology Facility (RTF) |
FY 2010: 6,355,606 FY 2005 to FY 2009 Average: 7,379,331 |
|
| RTP, North Carolina - Chapel Hill Laboratory |
FY 2010: 2,161,000 FY 2005 to FY 2009 Average: 1,910,000 |
|
| Richmond, California - Region 9 Laboratory | FY 2010: 263,670 FY 2005 to FY 2009 Average: 220,660 |
|
1 Read the complete list of Best Management Practices.
2 EPA prepared one water management plan to cover AWBERC and the Child Care facility in Cincinnati, Ohio.
3 Although the Edison campus comprises three separate facilities, a single meter captures all water consumption on the campus.
4 FY 2006 was the first year metered water data was available for the Montgomery facility; as a result, its historical water use only represents FY 2006-FY 2009.
5 EPA prepared one water management plan to cover the Main Laboratory, First Environments Early Learning Center, and NCC in RTP, North Carolina.
6 NCC and the First Environments Early Learning Center did not report water consumption independently until FY 2007. Before FY 2007, these facilities' water consumption was included in RTP Main's totals.
7 Water use at RTP Main and NCC does not include makeup water for the central utility plant (CUP). In FY 2009, EPA removed CUP water from these facilities' reported water consumption from FY 2007 to FY 2009 because EPA does not have operational control over the CUP.
![[logo] US EPA](http://www.epa.gov/epafiles/images/logo_epaseal.gif)