Environmental Innovation Portfolio
Designing Targeted Geographic Solutions
Environmental Innovation Portfolio
- Portfolio Homepage
- Introduction
- Table of Contents
- Setting Strategic Direction and Priorities
- Improving Agency Service Delivery
- Enhancing Regulatory Outcomes
- Supporting Superior Environmental Performance
- Promoting Environmental Sustainability
- Leveraging Partnerships for Environmental Protection
- Designing Targeted Geographic Solutions
Certain environmental challenges are strongly linked to place. They
require integrated, multidimensional solutions that balance competing
pressures for preserving or enhancing quality of life, economic
development, public health, ecosystem integrity, and environmental quality.
Innovative practices are helping public environmental agencies coordinate
or participate in effective responses to such complex challenges as open space protection, land redevelopment, and maintenance of watershed and
airshed quality.
Land Conservation and Growth Management
Public agencies are using innovative practices to conserve land and manage growth. Managing quality of life and ecosystem integrity is increasingly challenging as development encroaches on farmland, rural areas, and open space. Public agencies are responding by: 1) implementing open space preservation initiatives; and 2) promoting high density, low impact development. For example, states are purchasing land rights, negotiating conservation easements, and working with landowners to place lands in trust. Agencies are also developing increasingly sophisticated modeling tools to support managed growth without sacrificing traditional development goals. Education and outreach efforts are raising awareness of the costs of sprawl and loss of open space. Public environmental agency managers can play an important role-in collaboration with other partners-in mitigating land use patterns that undermine aspects of environmental quality that are critical to public health, economic development, quality of life, and ecosystem integrity.
- Smart Growth Network—States and U.S. EPA
- Promotes economic development that simultaneously fosters healthy communities,
strong neighborhoods, and transportation choices by providing tools,
resources, and information sharing. (http://www.smartgrowth.org
) - Livable Communities Program—Minnesota
- Creates a fund through the state legislature to invest in local communities
to encourage affordable housing opportunities, investment in brownfields
redevelopment, and promotion of efficient and connected development.
(http://www.metrocouncil.org/services/livcomm.htm
) - Quality Growth Efficiency Tools—Utah
- Provides technical support for regional planners to analyze different
quality growth scenarios with respect to transportation, air quality,
land use, and water availability impacts. (http://agrc.its.state.ut.us/othersites/qget/qgetindex.html
) - Home Town Maine—Maine
- Provides support to the state Planning Office to educate developers,
builders, homebuyers, and municipalities to encourage walkable communities
to combat sprawl and meet demand for alternative housing options to large
lot subdivisions. (http://www.maine.gov/dep/index.shtml
) - Rolling Easements—East Coast States
- Rolling easements are tailored to the special conditions in the coastal
environment (e.g., threatened coastal ecosystems, large-scale cumulative
loss of coastal intertidal habitats). This program motivates the private
sector to purchase rolling easements to ensure that wetlands survive
sea level rise and increasing development.
(http://yosemite.epa.gov/oar/globalwarming.nsf/content/ResourceCenterPublicationsSLRTakings.html)
Brownfields
Numerous initiatives are underway to speed the redevelopment of vacant, underused, and potentially contaminated properties in urban and rural areas. Cleaning up and reinvesting in these "brownfields" properties both improves environmental quality and relieves development pressures on undeveloped, "greenfields" land. Agencies are improving their brownfields and voluntary cleanup programs to reduce factors that constrain contaminated site cleanup and reuse, such as uncertainty around liability and complexity of cleanup and redevelopment requirements. Agencies also use various economic tools, such as loan and tax incentives, usually supported by state and federal appropriations, to encourage contaminated site reuse by lowering the cost relative to greenfields development. Agency managers can use innovative practices in this area to expedite cleanup of contaminated sites and to rapidly return properties to productive use.
- The Independent Cleanup Pathway—Oregon
- Assists parties in cleaning up low and medium priority contaminated
sites, under the State’s Voluntary Cleanup Program, without full
agency oversight, but with state approval and issuance of No
Further Action determination upon completion. (http://www.deq.state.or.us/wmc/cleanup/icp-main.htm
) - Tax Increment Financing—Alabama and Other States
- Uses the incremental difference in tax revenues anticipated from growth in property taxes generated by cleanup and reuse to finance brownfields redevelopment. (http://www.epa.gov/swerosps/bf/bftaxinc.htm)
- Redesigned Cleanup and Brownfields Program—Massachusetts
- Encourages faster assessment and cleanup of contaminated sites without
compromising environmental standards by giving property owners and other
potentially responsible parties (PRPs) more flexibility using Licensed
Site Professionals for relatively simple cleanups while focusing DEP
on complex or high-priority sites. (http://www.mass.gov/dep/cleanup/brownfie.htm
) - Brownfields Revolving Loan Fund—Illinois
- Provides a maximum of $1 million in low interest loans for site investigation and site remediation at brownfields sites; instituted and funded by the state legislature and administered by Illinois EPA. (http://www.epa.gov/swerosps/bf/rlflst.htm)
Airshed Quality
Addressing airshed quality and the associated public health impacts, particularly in urban nonattainment areas, requires innovative approaches to meet guidelines while maintaining flexibility and promoting economic growth. Federal mandates for air quality, particularly ground-level ozone, have set challenging limits for many cities, especially those in nonattainment. To balance growth and support business, states are turning to innovative practices that reduce ozone creating pollutants. Incentives for business action promote emission reductions and mitigate urban heat island effects. In addition, offset programs can enable continued economic development while ensuring overall pollution reductions are achieved. Further state-federal cooperative efforts provide flexibility in managing airsheds.
- Atlantic Station—Georgia and U.S. EPA Region 4
- Classifies a brownfields redevelopment on the former Atlantic Steel
site for its myriad of design and development strategies to reduce transportation
emissions as a Transportation Control Measure (TCM) within the State
Implementation Plan (SIP). (http://www.atlanticstation.com
) - Ozone Flex Program—U.S. EPA Region 6 and States in Region 6
- Memoranda of Agreement (MOAs) to outline specific, voluntary, locally tailored pollution control plans to reduce or maintain ozone levels below the one-hour standard, providing flexibility to meet federal mandates in areas that currently exceed the eight-hour standard. (http://www.epa.gov/earth1r6/6pd/air/pd-l/flex.htm)
- Clean Air Counts—Illinois
- Supports five campaigns focused on systematic, voluntary changes to
improve air quality, specifically for ozone creating pollutants to address
Chicago's ozone nonattainment problems. (http://www.cleanaircounts.org/cleanairillinois.shtml
) - Dioxin Reduction Strategy—New Hampshire
- Addresses public health concerns of dioxins by identifying the impacts
and routes of dioxin exposure, making an inventory of sources of dioxin,
and recommending multi-media action to reduce anthropogenic dioxin emissions.
(http://www.c2p2online.com/documents/NewHampshire.pdf
) - Urban Heat Island Project—California
- Quantifies benefits of and promotes measures to reduce urban heat island
effects, such as installing reflective roofs and paving materials, and
planting trees, which stems ozone creation and helps reduce energy use.
(http://eetd.lbl.gov/heatisland/
)
Watershed Quality
Whereas water quality management has traditionally focused on permitted point sources and their discharges, innovative practices are taking a broader view by considering total watershed quality and examining solutions that simultaneously address water quality, water quantity, and habitat conditions. These efforts are supplementing point source, end-of-pipe regulatory activity by: 1) targeting nonpoint water pollution sources; 2) enabling pollution controls to be established where the most cost effective improvements can be achieved; and 3) building partnerships with a full range of interested parties. States are turning to market mechanisms such as upstream prevention measures to reduce or eliminate the need for plant site water treatment and wetlands mitigation banks to increase water quality and habitat preservation cost effectively. Agencies simultaneously are targeting diffuse, nonpoint sources such as stormwater, animal feedlots, and septic systems with voluntary incentive programs and encouraging more effective and widespread use of treated wastewater through targeted water recycling efforts.
- New York City Watershed Protection—New York
- Establishes watershed microbial contamination protection measures
through land acquisition, land use alteration, and stringent watershed
rules to avoid building a costly filtration plant for its drinking
water. (http://www.ci.nyc.ny.us/html/dep/watershed/home.html
) - Western Iowa Environmental Stewardship Program—Iowa
- Brings together livestock producers and processors, federal and
state regulators, and academics to implement voluntary, comprehensive
nutrient management plans to reduce soil erosion and manure runoff.
(http://www.sectorstar.org/state/Project.cfm?ProjectID=103&StatePic=IA
) - Wetlands Mitigation Banking—Nebraska
- Organizes mitigation banks to offset negative wetlands impacts
from development with wetlands improvement; maintains the proximity
of the offsets by setting up banks within watershed boundaries
administered by Natural Resource Districts. (http://environment.fhwa.dot.gov/strmlng/searchresults.asp?id=1&keyword=&StateSelect=
Nebraska&CategorySelect=all&startrow=1&ResultsSelect=10&ShowDescription=
true&InnovativePract=#R1
)
![[logo] US EPA](http://www.epa.gov/epafiles/images/logo_epaseal.gif)