Jump to main content.


The Lean and Energy Toolkit

« Back to Toolkit Homepage

Chapter 3: Energy Assessment Strategies

On This Page

This chapter describes strategies and techniques for understanding how energy is used at your facility and identifying opportunities to reduce energy use and costs. This chapter discusses the following strategies:

  1. Walk Through Processes to Observe Energy Use
  2. Energy Audits and Measuring Energy Use
  3. Examine Energy Use with Value Stream Mapping
  4. Use Six Sigma to Find and Eliminate Energy Waste and Variation
  5. Eliminate Energy Wastes in Kaizen Events

A. Walk Through Processes to Observe Energy Use

New ToolWalking through and observing processes as they actually run at a facility can be a simple, but effective way to identify waste and find improvement opportunities. During the walk through, look for signs of unnecessary or inefficient energy use. Ask questions, such as the Questions for Understanding Energy Use below (Box 6), to learn more about potential opportunities to reduce energy use.

Questions for Understanding Energy Use (Box 6)

Motors and Machines

Compressed Air

Lighting

Process Heating

Facility Heating and Cooling

New ToolWalk throughs are a key step in value stream mapping and other Lean activities. Companies such as Toyota and GE frequently conduct “Energy Treasure Hunts” to find energy savings (see Box 7). An Energy Treasure Hunt is a three-day plant assessment event in which a cross-functional team of employees identifies opportunities to reduce unnecessary energy use. Project teams then implement the ideas that are likely to yield the greatest benefits through kaizen events.

Energy Treasure Hunts at General Electric (Box 7)

With mentoring assistance from Toyota, General Electric (GE) launched an integrated Lean and energy initiative that has identified upwards of $100 million in energy savings through energy treasure hunts. GE’s corporate commitment to energy use and greenhouse gas reductions has helped drive this effort. From 2005 to 2007, GE:

Source: General Electric, Ecomagination / Energy Treasure Hunt Team, 2007.

Top of page

B. Energy Audits and Measuring Energy Use

While a walk through is an excellent way to identify and fix energy wastes that are readily apparent, you may be leaving energy savings on the table unless you examine energy use more closely. Two strategies for learning more include:

  1. Conduct an energy audit to understand how energy is used—and possibly wasted—across your facility.
  2. Measure the energy use of individual production and support processes.

1. Energy Audits

Key TermAn energy audit, sometimes referred to as an energy assessment, is a study of the energy end uses and performance of a facility. Energy audits can range in complexity and level of detail, from a simple audit involving a facility walk through and review of utility bills, to a comprehensive analysis of historical energy use and energy-efficiency investment options. Energy audits allow managers to compare a plant’s energy use to industry benchmarks and identify specific energy savings opportunities.

In many locations, local utilities or non-profit manufacturing assistance organizations provide energy audit services for free or at reduced cost. There also are free tools available to help companies conduct energy audits. Appendix A describes service providers, resources, and tools for energy assessments.

Energy Savings from "Lean and Clean" Assessments (Box 8)

Top of page

2. Measuring Energy Use of Individual Processes

Key PointYou may not really know which process or process step uses the most energy—and therefore where the greatest energy savings might be— until you actually measure the energy use. During the analysis of the “current state” of a value stream or an individual process, collect data on how much energy each operation uses. Typical energy metrics include:

There are several techniques for measuring or estimating the energy used by production processes.

To Consider

Top of page

C. Examine Energy Use with Value Stream Mapping

Key TermOne effective way to understand energy use at your facility is to integrate energy analysis into the Lean value stream mapping process. Value stream mapping is a method of creating a visual representation of the information and material flows involved in creating a product or delivering a service to a customer. Lean practitioners use value stream maps to understand where the largest sources of waste are in the value stream and to prioritize future process-improvement efforts.

Adding Energy Analysis to Value Stream Mapping

Your value stream mapping team can examine the energy use of processes in a value stream at the same time your team examines other data about the “current state,” including Lean metrics such as cycle time (C/T), changeover time (C/O), and uptime. Use the techniques described above for observing and measuring energy use to collect energy data for processes in the value stream, or consider asking internal or outside experts to assist with the energy analysis. This may involve collecting baseline data in advance of a value stream mapping event.

The key is to have both Lean and energy use data available when your value stream mapping team brainstorms and prioritizes improvement ideas for the “future state” of the value stream. This will leverage the whole systems thinking of Lean to maximize operational gains and energy savings. Figure 4 shows a value stream map from a value and energy stream mapping project.

Example Results from Value and Energy Stream Mapping Projects (Box 10)

Example Value Stream Map (Figure 4)

Example Value Stream Map (Figure 4)
(click to enlarge in a new window)

Source: Packaging Plus LLC and California Manufacturing Technology Consulting

New Tool

 

Milling
2 people
C/T = 2 min
C/O = 2 hr
Uptime = 74%
Energy/pound output = 1 kWh

Example Process Data Box with Energy Use Data (Figure 5)

Another opportunity is to incorporate energy use data directly into current and future state value stream maps. Consider adding data on the average energy use or energy intensity of each process to the process data boxes in value stream maps, along with other regularly collected metrics. This will make it easier to spot key energy savings opportunities in the context of other improvement opportunities. Figure 5 shows an example process data box with energy use data (in kilowatt-hours per pound of output).

Key Point

Combining energy use analysis and value stream mapping is a proven technique for cutting energy costs and improving productivity. For example, the California Manufacturing Technology Consulting, a Manufacturing Extension Partnership center in California, has partnered with a local utility and an energy efficiency firm, Alternative Energy Systems Consulting, Inc., to conduct “Value and Energy Stream Mapping” projects with facilities (see Box 10 for examples).

Top of page

Identifying Opportunities

Incorporating energy analysis into value stream mapping allows your team to consider energy reduction opportunities alongside other process improvement opportunities. You may find ways to reduce energy use that will also provide other production benefits, such as fewer defects from more reliable equipment. Here are a few things to consider:

Top of page

D. Use Six Sigma to Find and Eliminate Energy Waste and Variation

Key TermSix Sigma refers to a collection of statistical analysis and process improvement tools designed to identify and eliminate variation (or defects) in a process. Although specific training is needed before using Six Sigma, many companies have added these methods to their continuous improvement toolbox, developing an improvement approach often known as Lean Six Sigma. Six Sigma analytical tools can be particularly useful for identifying energy waste in situations where there is a lot of energy use and when process-level data are available. Statistical analysis and process control methods can help isolate the root causes of energy use fluctuations and identify factors that result in energy waste.

Lean Six Sigma helped the 3M Company reduce energy use by 27 percent (when indexed to net sales) from 2000 to 2005. 3M has set a corporate goal for further energy use reductions of 20 percent for the period from 2005 to 2010, and the company views Lean Six Sigma as critical to realizing this performance goal (4).

Six Sigma and Energy Savings at Baxter International (Box 11)

In a compelling example of Six Sigma and energy-efficiency integration, a Baxter International facility in Spain saved €220,000 (approximately $300,000) in one year by installing energy meters, tracking daily energy use, and using kaizen events to reduce energy use. The facility recorded daily energy use for one year and used statistical process control (SPC) analyses to set a standard range of deviation. Each time energy use exceeded average use by 15 percent, the facility held a kaizen event to address the root causes of the peak. In addition to cutting energy costs, this initiative lessened the facility’s overall energy use and variability.

Source: Interview with Jenni Cawein, Manager, Corporate Environment, Health, and Safety Engineering, Baxter International, 30 May 2007.

Top of page

E. Conduct Energy Kaizen Events

Key TermAfter identifying the production areas that consume large amounts of energy, your facility can further analyze and eliminate wasteful energy practices through kaizen events, or rapid process improvement events. In kaizen events, which typically last 3-5 days, a cross-functional team of employees identifies and implements process changes to reduce wastes such as idle time, inventory, and defects. Kaizen events create important windows of opportunity to consider ways to eliminate energy waste. Revisit the results of energy audits or assessments to familiarize your Lean team with information that can be used to identify energy wastes during a kaizen event. Asking key questions during a kaizen event, such as those in Box 6, can also help to ensure that energy-reduction opportunities are identified as part of Lean implementation. Consider conducting energy-focused kaizen events at your facility to:

What Is an Energy Kaizen Event? (Box 12)

Key PointEnergy kaizen events combine a detailed energy-use assessment with immediate implementation of energy-reduction opportunities. From 1999 to 2005, Eastman Kodak used energy kaizen events to generate a total of $14 million in annual energy savings. Since then, energy kaizen events, along with other improvement efforts, have enabled Eastman Kodak to shut down one of the company’s two powerhouses in Rochester, New York. This resulted in over $20 million in additional annual savings (5). Table 4 shows examples of energy savings opportunities identified during a kaizen event.

Table 4: Example Actions Identified at a Kaizen Event (6)
Energy Waste Identified Counter Measure Savings Opportunity
Main supply fans (air conditioners) run 24 hours/day Change non-critical systems run time schedule $47,000
Fan motors are over-sized Lower horsepower on motors $27,000
Some exhaust fans run 24 hours/day Change exhaust fans to 2 speed and run at slow speed during off hours $18,000
Heat recovery unit from exhaust fans run faster than needed Bypass tilt coils and slow down fans $24,000
Room lights are always on and emit more light than needed Install motion sensors to control lights and reduce number of lamps $25,000
Water recirculation pumps are running but are not required Shut down and remove $20,000
Total Opportunity $161,000

The next chapter outlines practical strategies for reducing energy use through Lean events as well as day-to-day maintenance and operations activities.

Footnotes Exit EPA Disclaimer

1. California Manufacturing Technology Consulting (CMTC). “Automotive Case Study: Mission Rubber.” www.cmtc.com/success_stories/mission_rubber_Auto.html, accessed 23 Aug. 2007.

2. CMTC. “Industrial Case Study: Packaging Plus LLC.” www.cmtc.com/success_stories/ind_ppllc.html, accessed 13 Nov. 2006.

3. CMTC. “Trojan Battery Company Case Study.” Case Study No. 05-80760.

4. See U.S. EPA, “3M: Lean Six Sigma and Sustainability” case study, www.epa.gov/lean/studies/3m.htm.

5. Discussion with James Breeze, Energy Engineer/Project Leader, Worldwide Energy Office, Eastman Kodak Company, September 2007.

6. Adapted from a presentation by Eastman Kodak Company to the Business Roundtable Climate Resolve Teleconference, April 2004.
 

« Chapter 2 | Chapter 4 »

Lean Home | Top of Page


Local Navigation


Jump to main content.