The Lean and Energy Toolkit
Chapter 3: Energy Assessment Strategies
On This Page
- A. Walk Through Processes to Observe Energy Use
- B. Energy Audits and Measuring Energy Use
- C. Examine Energy Use with Value Stream Mapping
- D. Use Six Sigma to Find and Eliminate Energy Waste and Variation
- E. Eliminate Energy Wastes in Kaizen Events
This chapter describes strategies and techniques for understanding how energy is used at your facility and identifying opportunities to reduce energy use and costs. This chapter discusses the following strategies:
- Walk Through Processes to Observe Energy Use
- Energy Audits and Measuring Energy Use
- Examine Energy Use with Value Stream Mapping
- Use Six Sigma to Find and Eliminate Energy Waste and Variation
- Eliminate Energy Wastes in Kaizen Events
A. Walk Through Processes to Observe Energy Use
Walking through and observing
processes as they actually run at a facility can be a simple, but effective
way to identify waste and find improvement opportunities. During the
walk through, look for signs of unnecessary or inefficient energy use. Ask
questions, such as the Questions for Understanding Energy
Use below (Box 6),
to learn more about potential opportunities to reduce energy use.
Questions for Understanding Energy Use (Box 6)
Motors and Machines
- Are machines left running when not in operation? If so, why?
- Are energy efficient motors, pumps, and equipment used?
- Are motors, pumps, and equipment sized according to their loads? Do motor systems use variable speed drive controls?
Compressed Air
- If compressed air is used, do you notice any leaks in the compressed air system?
- Do compressed air systems use the minimum pressure needed to operate equipment?
Lighting
- Is lighting focused where workers need it?
- Is lighting controlled by motion sensors in warehouses, storage areas, and other areas that are intermittently used?
- Are energy-efficient fluorescent light bulbs used?
Process Heating
- Are oven and process heating temperatures maintained at higher levels than necessary?
Facility Heating and Cooling
- Are work areas heated or cooled more than necessary?
- Do employees have control over heating and cooling in their work areas?
- Are exterior windows or doors opened to adjust heating and cooling?
Walk throughs are a key step in value stream mapping and other Lean activities.
Companies such as Toyota and GE frequently conduct “Energy Treasure Hunts” to
find energy savings (see Box 7). An Energy Treasure Hunt is a three-day plant
assessment event in which a cross-functional team of employees identifies opportunities
to reduce unnecessary energy use. Project teams then implement the ideas that
are likely to yield the greatest benefits through kaizen events.
Energy Treasure Hunts at General Electric (Box 7)
With mentoring assistance from Toyota, General Electric (GE) launched an integrated Lean and energy initiative that has identified upwards of $100 million in energy savings through energy treasure hunts. GE’s corporate commitment to energy use and greenhouse gas reductions has helped drive this effort. From 2005 to 2007, GE:
- Conducted over 200 energy treasure hunts at GE facilities worldwide, and trained over 2,500 employees on how to conduct treasure hunts
- Used energy treasure hunts to identify 5,000 related kaizen projects, most of which are funded and in various stages of implementation
- Reduced greenhouse gas emissions by 250,000 metric tons and realized $70 million in energy cost savings from implemented projects
Source: General Electric, Ecomagination / Energy Treasure Hunt Team, 2007.
B. Energy Audits and Measuring Energy Use
While a walk through is an excellent way to identify and fix energy wastes that are readily apparent, you may be leaving energy savings on the table unless you examine energy use more closely. Two strategies for learning more include:
- Conduct an energy audit to understand how energy is used—and possibly wasted—across your facility.
- Measure the energy use of individual production and support processes.
1. Energy Audits
An energy audit, sometimes referred to as an energy assessment,
is a study of the energy end uses and performance of a facility. Energy
audits can range in complexity and level of detail, from a simple audit involving
a facility walk through and review of utility bills, to a comprehensive
analysis of historical energy use and energy-efficiency investment options.
Energy audits allow managers to compare a plant’s energy use to industry benchmarks and identify specific
energy savings opportunities.
In many locations, local utilities or non-profit manufacturing assistance organizations provide energy audit services for free or at reduced cost. There also are free tools available to help companies conduct energy audits. Appendix A describes service providers, resources, and tools for energy assessments.
Energy Savings from "Lean and Clean" Assessments (Box 8)
- The Green Suppliers Network, a partnership between EPA and the National Institute of Standards and Technology Manufacturing Extension Partnership, conducts “Lean and Clean” assessments for small and medium-sized companies.
- As of 2007, 49 assessments have identified energy savings of 247,165 million Btu and over 72 million kWh.
- These assessments also identified about $7.5 million per year in environmental savings and about $19.1 million per year in Lean savings.
- See www.greensuppliers.gov
for
more information.
2. Measuring Energy Use of Individual Processes
You
may not really know which process or process step uses the most energy—and therefore where the
greatest energy savings might be— until you actually measure the energy
use. During the analysis of the “current state” of a value
stream or an individual process, collect data on how much energy each
operation uses. Typical energy metrics include:
-
Kilowatt-hours (for electricity)
Common Energy Units (Box 9)
Energy Units / Energy Equivalent
- 1 kilowatt-hour / 3,412 Btu
- 1 Therm / 100,000 Btu
- 1 cubic foot natural gas / 1,000 Btu
- 1 horsepower / 746 Watts
- Therms (for natural gas)
- British thermal units (Btu)
- Energy intensity (energy use per production unit)
- Energy costs (dollar amount spent on energy)
There are several techniques for measuring or estimating the energy used by production processes.
- Metering: One technique is to install meters to track the energy use of a process. For example, flow meters can be installed to track natural gas inputs to ovens used to provide process heat and electric meters can be used to monitor electricity use in a particular process area. Metering enables a facility to track energy use over short and longer time periods.
- Estimating: Another technique is to estimate energy use based on information provided by equipment manufacturers. Calculate energy use for specific equipment or process activities using equipment energy specifications (often obtained from equipment manuals or vendors) coupled with equipment operation data (e.g., number of hours the equipment is in different modes of operation). While such calculations are often not precise, they can indicate the order of magnitude of energy use.
- Energy Studies: Energy specialists can also help conduct detailed analyses of energy use and costs at both the facility level and the process level. This type of analysis can look not only at where and how much energy is used, but also opportunities to reduce energy costs through load shifting (shifting electricity use to off-peak times), changing the mix of energy sources, and other strategies.
To Consider
- How much energy does your facility use?
- Which value streams and production processes contribute the most to your facility’s total energy use?
- What are the costs associated with this energy use?
- Where are the best places to look for energy savings?
C. Examine Energy Use with Value Stream Mapping
One effective way to understand
energy use at your facility is to integrate energy analysis into the
Lean value stream mapping process. Value stream mapping is a method of creating
a visual representation of the information and material flows involved in creating
a product or delivering a service to a customer. Lean practitioners use value
stream maps to understand where the largest sources of waste are in the
value stream and to prioritize future process-improvement efforts.
Adding Energy Analysis to Value Stream Mapping
Your value stream mapping team can examine the energy use of processes in a value stream at the same time your team examines other data about the “current state,” including Lean metrics such as cycle time (C/T), changeover time (C/O), and uptime. Use the techniques described above for observing and measuring energy use to collect energy data for processes in the value stream, or consider asking internal or outside experts to assist with the energy analysis. This may involve collecting baseline data in advance of a value stream mapping event.
The key is to have both Lean and energy use data available when your value stream mapping team brainstorms and prioritizes improvement ideas for the “future state” of the value stream. This will leverage the whole systems thinking of Lean to maximize operational gains and energy savings. Figure 4 shows a value stream map from a value and energy stream mapping project.
Example Results from Value and Energy Stream Mapping Projects (Box 10)
- Mission Rubber, a manufacturer of rubber couplings for the construction industry, conducted a five-day value stream mapping event and two kaizen events to shorten lead times and reduce energy use. The company saved an estimated 473,076 kWh and $40,000 in energy costs per year while increasing productivity and sales (1).
- Packaging Plus LLC, a packaging provider located in La Mirada, California, saved $558,000 per year in labor, improved productivity 41 percent, and reduced annual energy use by 613,629 kWh, for a savings of $61,000 per year, by conducting a value and energy stream mapping workshop and two kaizen events (2).
- Trojan Battery Company, a manufacturer of deep cycle batteries located in Santa Fe Spring, California, used value and energy stream mapping with kaizen events to decrease energy intensity by 33 percent in four months, saving 1,283,639 kWh and $100,000 per year in energy costs (3).
Example Value Stream Map (Figure 4)
(click
to enlarge in a new window)
Source: Packaging Plus LLC and California Manufacturing Technology Consulting
![]()
| Milling |
| 2 people |
| C/T = 2 min C/O = 2 hr Uptime = 74% Energy/pound output = 1 kWh |
Example Process Data Box with Energy Use Data (Figure 5)
Another opportunity is to incorporate energy use data directly into current and future state value stream maps. Consider adding data on the average energy use or energy intensity of each process to the process data boxes in value stream maps, along with other regularly collected metrics. This will make it easier to spot key energy savings opportunities in the context of other improvement opportunities. Figure 5 shows an example process data box with energy use data (in kilowatt-hours per pound of output).
![]()
Combining energy use analysis and value stream mapping is a proven technique for cutting energy costs and improving productivity. For example, the California Manufacturing Technology Consulting, a Manufacturing Extension Partnership center in California, has partnered with a local utility and an energy efficiency firm, Alternative Energy Systems Consulting, Inc., to conduct “Value and Energy Stream Mapping” projects with facilities (see Box 10 for examples).
Identifying Opportunities
Incorporating energy analysis into value stream mapping allows your team to consider energy reduction opportunities alongside other process improvement opportunities. You may find ways to reduce energy use that will also provide other production benefits, such as fewer defects from more reliable equipment. Here are a few things to consider:
- Key
Questions: When you look at energy uses in the context of the entire
value stream, ask two fundamental questions:
- Is this energy end use needed?
- Is there a way to deliver this end use more efficiently?
- Eliminating Energy End Uses: Eliminating entire energy end uses can result in substantial cost savings, improve production flow, and simplify processes. For example, when planning for a Lean and environment kaizen event, a Lasco Bathware manufacturing plant found it could eliminate a shrink-wrap heating oven. This resulted in an annual savings of $99,290 and 12.6 million cubic feet of natural gas.
-
Support
Processes: Support processes may consume significant amounts of energy.
Even brief consideration of support processes in value
stream mapping enables a Lean team to think more broadly when identifying
wastes and improvement opportunities. For example, particular processes
may produce air emissions that go to a pollution control device (e.g., a natural
gas-fired thermal oxidizer) or effluent that is sent to a wastewater treatment
plant. Other support processes include lighting, heating, and cooling.
D. Use Six Sigma to Find and Eliminate Energy Waste and Variation
Six
Sigma refers to a collection of statistical analysis and process improvement
tools designed to identify and eliminate variation (or defects) in a process.
Although specific training is needed before using Six Sigma, many companies
have added these methods to their continuous improvement toolbox, developing
an improvement approach often known as Lean Six Sigma. Six Sigma analytical
tools can be particularly useful for identifying energy waste in situations
where there is a lot of energy use and when process-level data are available.
Statistical analysis and process control methods can help isolate the root
causes of energy use fluctuations and identify factors that result in energy
waste.
Lean Six Sigma helped the 3M Company reduce energy use by 27 percent (when indexed to net sales) from 2000 to 2005. 3M has set a corporate goal for further energy use reductions of 20 percent for the period from 2005 to 2010, and the company views Lean Six Sigma as critical to realizing this performance goal (4).
Six Sigma and Energy Savings at Baxter International (Box 11)
In a compelling example of Six Sigma and energy-efficiency integration, a Baxter International facility in Spain saved €220,000 (approximately $300,000) in one year by installing energy meters, tracking daily energy use, and using kaizen events to reduce energy use. The facility recorded daily energy use for one year and used statistical process control (SPC) analyses to set a standard range of deviation. Each time energy use exceeded average use by 15 percent, the facility held a kaizen event to address the root causes of the peak. In addition to cutting energy costs, this initiative lessened the facility’s overall energy use and variability.
Source: Interview with Jenni Cawein, Manager, Corporate Environment, Health, and Safety Engineering, Baxter International, 30 May 2007.
E. Conduct Energy Kaizen Events
After identifying the production areas that
consume large amounts of energy, your facility can further analyze and
eliminate wasteful energy practices through kaizen events, or rapid process
improvement events. In kaizen events, which typically last 3-5 days, a cross-functional
team of employees identifies and implements process changes to reduce
wastes such as idle time, inventory, and defects. Kaizen events create important
windows of opportunity to consider ways to eliminate energy waste. Revisit
the results of energy audits or assessments to familiarize your Lean team with
information that can be used to identify energy wastes during a kaizen event.
Asking key questions during a kaizen event, such as those in Box 6, can also
help to ensure that energy-reduction opportunities are identified as part of
Lean implementation. Consider conducting energy-focused kaizen events at your
facility to:
- Understand how energy is used in a particular process
- Brainstorm opportunities to reduce energy use in that process
- Implement those ideas in a short time frame
What Is an Energy Kaizen Event? (Box 12)
- Relies on a short burst of intense activity (3-5 days)
- Focuses on eliminating energy waste
- Involves multi-functional teams (e.g., utilities specialists, process specialists, product specialists, quality facilitator, and/or others)
- Makes changes during the event
- Stresses non-capital improvements
Energy
kaizen events combine a detailed energy-use assessment with immediate
implementation of energy-reduction opportunities. From 1999 to 2005,
Eastman Kodak used energy kaizen events to generate a total of $14
million in annual energy savings. Since then, energy kaizen events,
along with other improvement efforts, have enabled Eastman Kodak
to shut down one of the company’s
two powerhouses in Rochester, New York. This resulted in over $20 million
in additional annual savings (5). Table 4 shows examples of energy
savings opportunities identified during a kaizen event.
| Energy Waste Identified | Counter Measure | Savings Opportunity |
|---|---|---|
| Main supply fans (air conditioners) run 24 hours/day | Change non-critical systems run time schedule | $47,000 |
| Fan motors are over-sized | Lower horsepower on motors | $27,000 |
| Some exhaust fans run 24 hours/day | Change exhaust fans to 2 speed and run at slow speed during off hours | $18,000 |
| Heat recovery unit from exhaust fans run faster than needed | Bypass tilt coils and slow down fans | $24,000 |
| Room lights are always on and emit more light than needed | Install motion sensors to control lights and reduce number of lamps | $25,000 |
| Water recirculation pumps are running but are not required | Shut down and remove | $20,000 |
| Total Opportunity | $161,000 | |
The next chapter outlines practical strategies for reducing energy use through Lean events as well as day-to-day maintenance and operations activities.
Footnotes 
1. California Manufacturing Technology Consulting (CMTC). “Automotive Case Study: Mission Rubber.” www.cmtc.com/success_stories/mission_rubber_Auto.html, accessed 23 Aug. 2007.
2. CMTC. “Industrial Case Study: Packaging Plus LLC.” www.cmtc.com/success_stories/ind_ppllc.html, accessed 13 Nov. 2006.
3. CMTC. “Trojan Battery Company Case Study.” Case Study No. 05-80760.
4. See U.S. EPA, “3M: Lean Six Sigma and Sustainability” case study, www.epa.gov/lean/studies/3m.htm.
5. Discussion with James Breeze, Energy Engineer/Project Leader, Worldwide Energy Office, Eastman Kodak Company, September 2007.
6. Adapted from a presentation
by Eastman Kodak Company to the Business Roundtable Climate Resolve Teleconference,
April 2004.
![[logo] US EPA](http://www.epa.gov/epafiles/images/logo_epaseal.gif)
