Grantee Research Project Results
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Research and Development
National Center for Environmental Research
Science to Achieve Results (STAR) Program
CLOSED - FOR REFERENCES PURPOSES ONLY
Collaborative Science And Technology Network For Sustainability
This is the initial announcement of this funding opportunity.
|Funding Opportunity Numbers:||Communities and the Built Environment (EPA-G2006-STAR-H1)|
|Industrial Ecology and Organizational Behavior (EPA-G2006-STAR-H2)|
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number: 66.509
Solicitation Opening Date: February 10, 2006
Solicitation Closing Date: May 17, 2006, 4:00 pm Eastern Time
Eligibility Contact: Tom Barnwell: 202-343-9862; email: (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Electronic Submissions: Bronda Harrison: 202-564-1790; email: (email@example.com)
Technical Contact: Diana Bauer: Phone: 202-343-9759; email: (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Synopsis of Program
Through the Collaborative Science and Technology Network for Sustainability (CNS), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Office of Research and Development (ORD) is seeking applications proposing innovative regional projects that apply science to decision-making to address a stated problem or opportunity relating to sustainability.
Anticipated Type of Award: Grant or Cooperative Agreement
Estimated Number of Awards: Approximately 7 awards
Anticipated Funding Amount: Approximately $2 million total for all awards
Potential Funding per Grant: Up to $100,000/year with a duration of 2 or 3 years and no more than a total of $300,000, including direct and indirect costs. Cost-sharing is not required. Proposals with budgets exceeding the total award limits will not be considered.
Public nonprofit institutions/organizations (includes public institutions of higher education and hospitals) and private nonprofit institutions/organizations (includes private institutions of higher education and hospitals) located in the U.S.; state and local governments; Federally Recognized Indian Tribal Governments; and U.S. territories or possessions are eligible to apply. See full announcement for more details.
You may submit either a paper application or an electronic application (but not both) for this announcement. The necessary forms for submitting a STAR application will be found on the National Center for Environmental Research (NCER) web site, http://www.epa.gov/ncer/rfa/forms/. To apply electronically, you must use the application package available at https://apply.grants.gov/forms_apps_idx.html (see "Submission Instructions for Electronic Applications" in Section IV). If your organization is not currently registered with grants.gov, you need to allow approximately one week to complete the registration process to apply electronically. This registration, and electronic submission of your application, must be performed by an appropriate representative of your organization.
Eligibility Contact: Tom Barnwell: 202-343-9862; email: (email@example.com)
Electronic Submissions: Bronda Harrison: 202-564-1790; email: (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Technical Contact: Diana Bauer: Phone: 202-343-9759; email: (email@example.com)
While there are many definitions of sustainability and sustainable development, perhaps the most cited definition of sustainable development is from the Brundtland Commission - "development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs" (Brundtland, 1987). Aspirations for sustainability are complicated by projections that over the next 50 years, the world's population is expected to grow 50%, global economic activity is expected to grow 500%, and global energy and materials use is expected to grow 300% (Matthews et. al., 2000). These trends present a challenge to environmental sustainability that will demand informed design, planning and decision-making at all levels - global, national, and regional; community and individual; and industrial.
To encourage innovative thinking about practical applications of science (including social science) and engineering for sustainability, ORD is funding the Collaborative Science and Technology Network for Sustainability (CNS). CNS projects will bring together diverse sets of partners to explore and learn about new approaches for environmental protection that are systems-oriented, forward-looking, and preventive and also link to economic and social dimensions. The collection of funded projects will inform practical learning on analytical tools, collaborative approaches, and informed decision-making that support progress towards sustainability. The analytical tools developed will draw on a scientific understanding of the consequences of decisions and actions. Information on projects currently funded under CNS can be found at http://www.epa.gov/ncer/cns.
CNS aims to assist various stakeholders and the public in learning about and refining the integrated and proactive approaches to environmental protection at a regional scale that form the basis for sustainability. Integrated and proactive approaches to environmental protection that incorporate economic and social dimensions have a long history. The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969 states that "it is the continuing policy of the Federal Government.to use all practicable means and measures. to create and maintain conditions under which man and nature can exist in productive harmony, and fulfill the social, economic, and other requirements of present and future generations of Americans." Many of the needs identified by NEPA are still present today. The broad approach articulated by NEPA complements focused and targeted risk assessment and management.
While the concept of sustainability is fairly intuitive, translating the concept into science that informs practical action is challenging. Progress still needs to be made towards a detailed scientific understanding of ecological and societal conditions, ecological limits, and possible technological, societal, and economic paths to sustainable solutions at multiple scales. In the past 5-10 years there have been many published studies and white papers identifying sustainability research in various disciplines relating to societal needs. (Board on Sustainable Development, 1999; Brewer and Stern, 2005; Committee on Materials Flow Accounting of Natural Resources, 2004; Committee on Grand Challenges in Environmental Sciences, 2001; Committee on Grand Challenges in the Chemical Industry, 2005; Kates et. al., 2001; Olson and Rejeski, 2005; Vanegas, 2003). There is a growing array of tools, data, and information available to support relevant decision-making (EPA, 2003a, http://www.epa.gov/geoss/). Finally, there are emerging approaches to collaboration (EPA, 2004) and protocols to support social and behavioral aspects of multi-sector decision-making (EPA, 2003b). The CNS program provides an opportunity to innovatively connect relevant recent work by applying science (including social science) and engineering to practical decision-making through applied projects addressing sustainability at a regional scale.
A previous CNS solicitation was issued in 2004. The previous CNS solicitation and funded projects, as well as agenda and presentations from the first grantees' workshop, can be found at: http://www.epa.gov/ncer/cns. Grantees are also encouraged to interact with EPA programs. Current grantees interact with a number of Regional Offices and EPA programs, including, for example, Smart Growth (http://www.epa.gov/smartgrowth/ and http://www.epa.gov/watertrain/smartgrowth/resources/resources.htm) and Greening the Supply Chain (http://www.epa.gov/dfe/tools/greening.htm). More information on potentially relevant EPA programs can be found at: http://www.epa.gov/sustainability.
The specific Strategic Goal, Objective and Sub-objective from EPA's Strategic Plan that relate to this solicitation are:
Goal 5: Compliance and Environmental Stewardship, Objective 5.4: Enhance Science and Research, Sub-objective 5.4.2: Conducting Research
The EPA's Strategic Plan can be found at http://www.epa.gov/ocfo/plan/2003sp.pdf
Authority and Regulations
The authority for this Request for Applications (RFA) and resulting awards is contained in the Toxic Substances Control Act, Section 10, 15 U.S.C. 2609; Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, Section 20, 7 U.S.C. 136r; Clean Air Act, Section 103, 42 U.S.C. 7403; Clean Water Act, Section 104, 33 U.S.C.; Safe Drinking Water Act, Section 1442, 42 U.S.C. 300j-1; Solid Waste Disposal Act, Section 8001, 42 U.S.C. 6901.
As a threshold determination, to be considered for funding, a proposed project must consist of activities within the statutory terms of EPA's grant authorities (See Section III also). Most of the statutes authorize grants for the following activities: "research, investigations, experiments, training, demonstrations, surveys and studies." These activities relate generally to the gathering or transferring of information or advancing the state of knowledge. Grant proposals should emphasize this "learning" concept, as opposed to "fixing" an environmental problem via a well-established method. For example, a proposal to plant some trees in an economically depressed area, in order to prevent erosion, would probably not, in itself, fall within the statutory terms "research, studies" etc., nor would a proposal to start a routine recycling program.
On the other hand, the statutory term "demonstration" can encompass the first instance of the application of a pollution control technique, or an innovative application of a previously used method. Similarly, the application of established practices may qualify when they are part of a broader project which qualifies under the term "research." However, EPA cannot fund demonstration projects year after year for an indefinite period of time.
Applicants must be aware that there are certain statutory restrictions related to EPA's annual Appropriation Acts. Therefore, EPA funds for awards under this solicitation cannot be used for projects within the scope of activities covered by other appropriation accounts within the EPA Appropriation Act. For example, CNS grants cannot be used:
- To improve watershed protection measures with tools, technical assistance, and training.
- To develop and enhance state and tribal efforts to protect wetlands or to implement State and Tribal wetland programs.
- To provide training, research, and technical assistance to individuals and organizations to facilitate the inventory of brownfield sites, site assessments, remediation of brownfield sites, community involvement or site preparation.
Specific Research Areas of Interest/Expected Outputs and Outcomes
Note: The term "output" means an environmental activity or effort, and associated work products, related to a specific environmental goal(s) (such as producing a new methodology) that will be produced or developed over a period of time under the agreement. The term "outcome" means the result, effect, or consequence that will occur from the above activit(ies) that is related to an environmental, behavioral, or health-related objective.
The following areas are of particular interest: 1) identify a practical problem or opportunity relating to sustainability and explain its long-term importance or significance; 2) articulate the use of science and engineering, including data or information to be synthesized; 3) define short- and long-term success in terms of environmental, economic, and social measures and explain how progress will be tracked; 4) identify partners and collaborators for the project and approach for stimulating broader participation; 5) articulate a plan for transferring tools, approaches, and lessons to other states, localities, regions or industries.
There are two specific application areas to be considered. In some cases, a project may fall into one or more of these. Applicants should select the one that best describes the proposed project.
- Communities and the Built Environment
Relevant questions might include, but are not limited to: How can communities across multiple jurisdictions make planning decisions and how can the built infrastructure best be developed to align with collective long term environmental, economic, and social goals? What core set of principles can best be used to guide the design and management of human systems (such as land use, buildings, transportation systems) in a manner that protects natural systems and ensures resource sustainability? What are the levels and types of human activities that can be conducted within a given spatial area without critically and adversely altering biogeochemical cycles and ecosystem functioning?
- Industrial Ecology and Organizational Behavior
Relevant questions might include, but are not limited to: How can organizations access leverage points in materials, water, and energy use cycles so that the environmental benefits of pollution prevention, green chemistry, green engineering, environmental management accounting, life cycle management, etc. are felt on a regional scale?
In each of the above topic areas, quality and availability of resources over time form a basis for sustainability. Resources directly relate to the multi-media environment to be protected, the underlying causes of the environmental problems to be addressed, and the solutions to be developed. With regard to environmental outcomes, proposals should identify the specific, quantifiable short- and long-term sustainability outcomes of one or more resources, including air, ecosystems, energy, land, materials, and water that the project is anticipated to contribute to. (Applicants should identify specific outcomes for their project that relate to the general resource sustainability outcomes listed below.) Desired short- and long- term outcomes in the economic and social dimensions should also be addressed. While proposed projects most likely will not lead to dramatic improvement in environmental, economic, and social dimensions during the course of the work, applicants are encouraged to describe how environmental, economic, and/or social progress relevant to the proposed project may be monitored over time, through data collected by the applicant or by others. Applicants should carefully explain how their proposed application of science or engineering to design, planning, policy or decision-making is anticipated to contribute to achieving the desired sustainability outcomes they have identified.
General Resource Sustainability Outcomes (EPA, 2005) Air: Sustain clean and healthy air Ecosystems: Protect and restore ecosystems functions, goods, and services Energy: Generate clean energy and use it efficiently Land: Support ecologically sensitive land management and development Materials: Use materials carefully and shift to environmentally preferable materials Water: Sustain water resources to ensure quality and availability for desired uses
Problems or opportunities addressed should be regional in scale. A regional scale project can range in geographic extent from a metropolitan area to several states.
Applicants are encouraged to combine sufficient scientific sophistication with an approach to communication of knowledge and information to broader audiences. Project outputs may include (but are not limited to): new approaches or applications in areas such as decision-making under uncertain and incomplete information; identification of appropriate problem boundaries; collaborative problem solving; foresight and futures; data management and synthesis; geographic information and modeling at multiple scales; system resilience; incremental and transformational systems change; community involvement and diverse perspectives; and environmental justice.
Board on Sustainable Development. Our Common Journey: A Transition Toward Sustainability. National Research Council: National Academy Press, 1999.
Brewer, G. D., P. C. Stern (ed.) Decision-Making and the Environment: Social and Behavioral Science Research Priorities. National Research Council: National Academy Press, 2005.
Bruntland, G. (ed.). Our Common Future: The World Commission on Environment and Development, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1987.
Committee on Materials Flow Accounting of Natural Resources. Materials Count: The Case for Material Flows Analysis. National Research Council: National Academy Press, 2004.
Committee on Grand Challenges in Environmental Sciences. Grand Challenges in Environmental Sciences. National Research Council: National Academy Press, 2001.
Committee on Grand Challenges in the Chemical Industry. Grand Challenges and Research Needs: A Workshop Report. Research Council: National Academy Press, 2005.
EPA. EPA’s Draft Report on the Environment: Technical Document. EPA/600/R/03/050. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2003a.
EPA. Public Involvement Policy of the US Environmental Protection Agency. EPA/233/B/03/002. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2003b.
EPA. Solving Environmental Problems Through Collaboration: Draft White Paper for Discussion, http://www.epa.gov/epainnov/collaboration/whitepaper2.pdf, 2004.
EPA. Everyday Choices: Opportunities for Environmental Stewardship: A Report to the Administrator, http://epa.gov/innovation/pdf/rpt2admin.pdf, 2005.
Kates, R. W., W. C. Clark, R. Corell, J. M. Hall, C. C. Jaeger, I. Lowe, J. J. McCarthy, H. J. Schellnhuber, B. Bolin, N. M. Dickson, S. Faucheaux, G. C. Gallopin, A. Grubler, B. Huntley, J. Jager, N. S. Jodha, R. E. Kasperson, A. Mabogunje, P. Matson, H. Mooney, B. Moore III, T. O’Riordan, U. Svedin. Sustainability Science. Science 292(5517): 641-642 (2001).
Matthews, E., C. Amann, S. Bringezu, M. Fischer-Kowalski, W. Huttler, R. Klein, Y. Moriguchi, C. Ottke, E. Rodenburg, D. Rogich, H. Schandl, H. Schutz, E. Van Der Voet, H. Weisz. The Weight of Nations: Material Outflows from Industrial Economies. Washington, DC. World Resources Institute: 2000.
Olson, R. and D. Rejeski. Environmentalism and the Technologies of Tomorrow: Shaping the Next Industrial Revolution. Washington, DC: Island Press: 2005.
Vanegas, J. A.. Road Map and Principles for Built Environment Sustainability. Environmental Science and Technology 37(23): 5363-5372 (2003).
This RFA will support applied research, studies, investigations, and pilot demonstrations, however it will not support full-scale implementation. A range of applications from more scientific to more demonstration-oriented is expected. However, each application should incorporate both scientific expertise or methods and practical planning or decision-making. Innovative contributions are expected in the integration of scientific knowledge and the application to decision-making.
Agency policy prevents EPA scientists, engineers, and specialists from providing individual applicants with information that would provide them with an unfair competitive advantage. Consequently, EPA scientists, engineers, and specialists will not review, comment, advise, or provide technical assistance to applicants preparing applications in response to EPA RFAs, or discuss in any manner how the Agency will apply the published evaluation criteria for this competition.
After award decisions have been made, EPA will work with grantees to identify EPA scientists, engineers, and specialists to interact or collaborate on projects, as appropriate.
Groups of two or more eligible applicants are encouraged to form a consortium and submit a single application for this assistance agreement. The application must identify which organization will be the recipient of the assistance agreement and which organizations(s) will be subawardees of the recipient.
The application must include a plan (see "Data Plan" in section IV.E.) to make available to the public all data generated from observations, analyses, or model development (primary data) and any secondary (or existing) data used under a grant awarded from this RFA. The data must be available in a format and with documentation such that they may be used by others in the scientific community.
These awards may involve the collection of "Geospatial Information," which includes information that identifies the geographic location and characteristics of natural or constructed features or boundaries on the Earth or applications, tools, and hardware associated with the generation, maintenance, or distribution of such information. This information may be derived from, among other things, Geographic Positioning System (GPS), remote sensing, mapping, charting, and surveying technologies, or statistical data.
All applicants are asked to identify the EPA Region(s) where their project will take place. A map of the EPA's Regions can be found at: http://www.epa.gov/epahome/locate2.htm. The Regions' Strategic plans can be found at: http://www.epa.gov/ocfo/regionplans/regionalplans2.htm.
It is anticipated that a total of approximately $2 million will be awarded under this announcement, depending on the availability of funds. The EPA anticipates funding approximately 7 grants or cooperative agreements under this RFA. The projected award per grant is $75,000 to $100,000 per year total costs, for up to 3 years. Requests for amounts in excess of a total of $300,000, including direct and indirect costs, will not be considered. The total project period for an application submitted in response to this RFA may not exceed 3 years. The EPA reserves the right to reject all applications and make no awards under this RFA. The EPA reserves the right to make additional awards under this RFA, consistent with agency policy and without further competition, if additional funding becomes available. Any additional selections for awards will be made no later than 4 months after the original selection decisions.
EPA will either fund grants or cooperative agreements under this RFA.
Under a grant, EPA scientists, engineers, and environmental specialists are not permitted to be substantially involved in the execution of the project. However, EPA encourages interaction of its own laboratory scientists and environmental specialists with grant Principal Investigators after the award of an EPA grant for the purpose of exchanging information in areas of common interest that may add value to their respective activities, including enhancing the transferability of the methods or lessons from the project. The interaction must be incidental to achieving the project goals under a grant. Interaction that is "incidental" does not involve resource commitments. Additionally, under a grant, EPA scientists and specialists may participate with others as non-voting members on an advisory board for the project.
Where appropriate, based on consideration of the nature of the proposed project relative to the EPA's intramural programs and available resources, the EPA may fund cooperative agreements under this announcement. When addressing a question/problem of common interest, collaborations between EPA experts (laboratory scientists, program environmental specialists, or regional environmental specialists) and grant Principal Investigators are permitted under a cooperative agreement. These collaborations may include data and information exchange, providing technical input to experimental design and theoretical development, sharing of samples and equipment, and joint authorship of journal articles on these activities. Proposals must not identify EPA cooperators or interactions; specific interactions between EPA's investigators and those of the prospective recipient for cooperative agreements will be negotiated at the time of award.
Public nonprofit institutions/organizations (includes public institutions of higher education and hospitals) and private nonprofit institutions/organizations (includes private institutions of higher education and hospitals) located in the U.S.; state and local governments; Federally Recognized Indian Tribal Governments; and U.S. territories or possessions are eligible to apply. Universities and educational institutions must be subject to OMB Circular A-21. Profit-making firms are not eligible to receive grants from the EPA under this program.
Eligible nonprofit organizations include any organizations that meet the definition of nonprofit in OMB Circular A-122. However, nonprofit organizations described in Section 501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code that lobby are not eligible to apply.
National laboratories funded by Federal Agencies (Federally-Funded Research and Development Centers, "FFRDCs") may not apply. FFRDC employees may cooperate or collaborate with eligible applicants within the limits imposed by applicable legislation and regulations. They may participate in planning, conducting, and analyzing the work directed by the applicant, but may not direct projects on behalf of the applicant organization. The institution, organization, or governance receiving the award may provide funds through its grant from the EPA to an FFRDC for research personnel, supplies, equipment, and other expenses directly related to the project. However, salaries for permanent FFRDC employees may not be provided through this mechanism.
Federal Agencies may not apply. Federal employees are not eligible to serve in a principal leadership role on a grant, and may not receive salaries or augment their Agency's appropriations in other ways through grants made by this program. However, if these requirements are met, Federal Agencies may participate on projects.
The applicant institution may enter into an agreement with a Federal Agency to purchase or utilize unique supplies or services unavailable in the private sector. Examples are purchase of satellite data, census data tapes, chemical reference standards, analyses, or use of instrumentation or other facilities not available elsewhere. A written justification for federal involvement must be included in the application. In addition, an appropriate form of assurance that documents the commitment, such as a letter of intent from the Federal Agency involved, should be included.
Potential applicants who are uncertain of their eligibility should contact Tom Barnwell in NCER, phone 202-343-9862, email: (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Applications must substantially comply with the application submission instructions and requirements set forth in Section IV of this announcement or they will be rejected. In addition, where a page limit is expressed in Section IV with respect to the application or parts of the application, pages in excess of the page limitation will not be reviewed. Applications must be received by the EPA or through www.grants.gov on or before the solicitation closing date published in Section IV of this announcement. Applications received after the published closing date will be returned to the sender without further consideration. Also, applications exceeding the funding limits described herein will be returned without review. Applications that fail to demonstrate a public purpose of support or stimulation (e.g., proposing a project which primarily benefits a Federal program or provides a service for a Federal agency) will not be funded.
This RFA will support applied research, studies, investigations, and pilot demonstrations, however it will not support full-scale implementation. Applications that do not explain their link to sustainability will not be considered.
In addition, in order to be eligible for funding consideration, a project's focus generally must be one that is specified in the statutes mentioned in Section I. For most of the cited statutes, a project must address the causes, effects, extent, prevention, reduction, and elimination of air, water, solid/hazardous waste pollution, toxic substances control, or pesticide control. The overarching concern or principal focus must be on the statutory purpose of the applicable grant authority, in most cases "to prevent or control pollution."
In light of this, proposals relating to other topics which are sometimes included within the term "environment" such as recreation, conservation, restoration, protection of wildlife habitats, etc., should describe the relationship of these topics to the statutorily required purpose of pollution prevention and/or control.
You may submit either a paper application or an electronic application (but not both) for this announcement. Instructions for both forms of submission follow.
Internet Address to Request Application Package
For paper applications, forms and instructions can be found on the NCER web site: http://www.epa.gov/ncer/rfa/forms/.
For electronic applications, use the application package available at https://apply.grants.gov/forms_apps_idx.html (see “Submission Instructions for Electronic Applications”).
For both paper and electronic applications, an email will be sent by NCER to the Principal Investigator and the Administrative Contact (see below) to acknowledge receipt of the application and transmit other important information. The email will be sent from email@example.com; email to this address will not be accepted. If you do not receive an email acknowledgment within 30 days of the submission closing date, immediately contact the Technical Contact listed under "Agency Contacts" in this solicitation. Failure to do so may result in your application not being reviewed. See “Submission Instructions for Electronic Applications” for additional information regarding acknowledgment of receipt of electronically submitted applications. Please note: Due to often lengthy delays in delivery, it is especially important that you monitor NCER’s confirmation of receipt of your application when using regular mail.
Content and Form of Application Submission
The application is made by submitting the materials described below. It is essential that the application contain all information requested and be submitted in the formats described.
- Standard Form 424
- Key Contacts
- Table of Contents
- Abstract (1 page)
- Research Category and Funding Opportunity Number: The appropriate research areas and associated numbers for this RFA are:
The applicant must complete form SF424. This form will be the first page of the application. Instructions for completion of the SF424 are included with the form. The form must contain the original (or electronic) signature of an authorized representative of the applying institution. Please note that both the Principal Investigator and an administrative contact must be identified in Item 5 of the SF424.
Applicants are required to provide a “Dun and Bradstreet Data Universal Numbering System” (DUNS) number in Item 5 when applying for federal grants or cooperative agreements. Organizations may receive a DUNS number by calling 1-866-705-5711 or by visiting the web site at http://www.dnb.com .
Executive Order 12372, “Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs,” applies to most EPA programs and assistance agreements, unless the program or assistance agreement supports tribal, training/fellowships (other than Wastewater and Small Water Systems Operator training programs), and research and development (with some exceptions). Item 16 of the SF424 refers to this requirement. Selection of research proposals is limited to those administered by EPA’s Office of Research and Development which: (a) require an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS); or (b) do not require an EIS but will be newly initiated at a particular site and require unusual measures to limit the possibility of adverse exposure or hazard to the general public; or (c) have a unique geographic focus and are directly relevant to the governmental responsibilities of a State or local government within that geographic area. Otherwise, national research programs are exempt from review. Applicants should consult http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants/spoc.html to determine whether their state participates in this process and how to comply.
The applicant must complete the “Key Contacts” form as the second page of the application; the Key Contacts continuation page is also available http://www.epa.gov/ncer/rfa/forms. The Key Contacts form should also be completed for major sub-agreements (i.e., contacts at the institutions for primary co-investigators). Please make certain that all contact information is accurate.
Provide a list of the major subdivisions of the application indicating the page number on which each section begins. (A Table of Contents is not required for electronic submissions.)
The abstract is a very important document in the review process. Therefore, it is critical that the abstract accurately describes the research being proposed and conveys all the essential elements of the research. Also, the abstracts of applications that receive funding will be posted on the NCER web site.
The abstract should include the information indicated in the example format and described below (1-9). Examples of abstracts for current grants may be found on the NCER web site.
- EPA-G2006-STAR-H1 - Communities and the Built Environment
- EPA-G2006-STAR-H2 - Industrial Ecology and Organizational Behavior
Project Plan (15 pages)
Applications should focus on a limited number of project objectives that adequately and clearly demonstrate that they meet the RFA requirements. Explicitly identify the problem or opportunity you are addressing and how it relates to sustainability, including how your project relates to, builds on, and connects to previous or ongoing activities. Identify the data you will collect or use, the analytical tools you will use or develop, the decision-making you expect to support, and the results you expect to achieve. Discuss project partners and their roles in the project. Methods must be clearly stated so that reviewers can evaluate the appropriateness of your approach and the tools you intend to use.
This description must not exceed fifteen (15) consecutively numbered (bottom center), 8.5x11-inch pages of single-spaced, standard 12-point type with 1-inch margins. While these guidelines establish the minimum type size requirements, applicants are advised that readability is of paramount importance and should take precedence in selection of an appropriate font for use in the proposal.
The description must provide the following information:
- Problem or Opportunity: Identify the problem or opportunity the project is addressing and its relevance to sustainability. Briefly state why the intended project is important. This section should also include any background or introductory information that would help explain the objectives of the project (one to two pages recommended).
- Approach/Activities: Outline the project scientific design, methods, and techniques that you intend to use in meeting the objectives stated above. Describe the policy, planning, and/or decision-making that you plan to inform. Discuss your approach to collaborative decision-making (five to ten pages recommended).
- Expected Results, Benefits, Outputs, and Outcomes: Describe the products or activities you expect to complete during the project (outputs), the short- and long-term measures of success in the environmental, economic, and social dimensions (outcomes), and your approach to tracking progress. A clear, concise description will help NCER understand the merits of the project (one to two pages recommended).
- General Project Information: Discuss other information relevant to the potential success of the project. This should include facilities, personnel expertise/experience, project schedules, proposed management, interactions with other institutions and organizations, etc. Applications for multi-investigator projects must identify project management and the functions of each investigator in each team and describe plans to communicate and share data (one to two pages recommended).
- Important Attachments: References cited are in addition to the 15-page Project Plan limit. Appendices may be included but must remain within the 15-page limit.
Quality Assurance Statement (2 pages in addition to the 15-page research plan)
For any project involving data collection or processing, conducting surveys, environmental measurements, modeling, or the development of environmental technology (whether hardware-based or via new techniques), provide a Statement on processes that will be used to assure that results of the research satisfy the intended project objectives. The EPA is particularly interested in the quality controls for data generation and acquisition, and how data validation and usability will be verified. The statement must describe a system that complies with ANSI/ASQC E4, Specifications and Guidelines for Quality Systems for Environmental Data Collection and Environmental Technology Programs, and must not exceed two consecutively numbered, 8.5x11-inch pages of single-spaced, standard 12-point type with 1-inch margins.
For each item below either present the required information, reference the specific location of the information in the Research Plan, or provide a justification of why the item does not apply to the proposed research.
- Identify the individual who will be responsible for the quality assurance and quality control aspects of the research. [Quality assurance (QA) is an integrated system of management activities involving planning, implementation, documentation, assessment, and improvement to ensure that a process or item is of the type and quality needed for the project. Quality control (QC) is the system of technical activities that measures the attributes and performance of a process or item against defined standards to verify that they meet the stated requirements.]
- Discuss the activities to be performed or the hypothesis to be tested and criteria for determining acceptable data quality. Such criteria may be expressed in terms of precision, accuracy, representativeness, completeness, and comparability or in terms of data quality objectives or acceptance and evaluation criteria. These criteria also must be applied to determine the acceptability of existing, or “secondary”, data to be used in the project, and their use discussed. (In this context, secondary data may be defined as data previously collected for other purposes or from other sources.)
- Describe the study or project design. Include sample type(s) and location requirements, all statistical analyses that were or will be used to estimate the types and numbers of physical samples required, or equivalent information for studies using survey and interview techniques, or describe how new technology will be benchmarked to improve existing processes, such as those used by industry.
- Explain how the effectiveness of any new technology or process will be measured. Describe the procedures that will be used in the calibration and performance evaluation of all analytical instrumentation and all methods of analysis to be used during the project.
- Describe the procedures for the handling and custody of samples, including sample collection, identification, preservation, transportation, and storage, or how the accuracy of test measurements will be verified.
- Discuss the procedures for data reduction and reporting, including a description of all statistical methods to make inferences and conclusions, with identification of any statistical software to be used. Discuss any computer models to be designed or utilized and describe the associated verification and validation techniques.
- Describe the quantitative and/or qualitative procedures that will be used to evaluate the success of the project, including any plans for peer or other reviews of the study design or analytical methods prior to data collection.
ANSI/ASQC E4, Specifications and Guidelines for Quality Systems for Environmental Data Collection and Environmental Technology Programs, is available for purchase from the American Society for Quality, phone 1-800-248-1946, item T55. Only in exceptional circumstances should it be necessary to consult this document. An EPA guidance document, Guidance on Satisfying EPA Quality System Requirements for STAR Grants (EPA QA/G-1STAR) is available for potential applicants and addresses in detail how to comply with ANSI/ASQC E4 for STAR grants. This may be found on the Internet at http://www.epa.gov/ncer under “Guidance and FAQs.”
Page allowances for the following sections are in addition to those allowed for the Research Plan and Quality Assurance Statement.
Data Plan (2 pages in addition to the 15-page research plan)
The application must include a plan to make available all data (including primary and secondary/existing data) from observations, analyses, or model development collected or used under an agreement awarded as a result of this RFA in a format and with documentation/metadata such that they may be used by others in the scientific community. Applicants who plan to develop or enhance databases containing proprietary or restricted information must provide a strategy, within the two pages, to make the data widely available, while protecting privacy or property rights.
Prepare a budget table using the guidance and format found at http://www.epa.gov/ncer/rfa/forms/, and select “All required forms”. If a sub-agreement, such as a subcontract, is greater than $25K and is included in the application, provide a separate budget for the sub-agreement. Include the total amount for the sub-agreement under “Contracts” in the master budget. Any project containing sub-agreements that constitute more than 40% of the total direct cost of the grant will be subject to special review. Additional justification for use of such subcontracts must be provided, discussing the need for this agreement to accomplish the objectives of the research project.
Please note that institutional cost-sharing is not required. However, if cost-sharing is proposed, a brief statement concerning cost-sharing should be added to the budget justification, and estimated dollar amounts must be included in the appropriate categories in the budget table.
Budget Justification (2 pages in addition to the Section E. page limitations)
Describe the basis for calculating the personnel, fringe benefits, travel, equipment, supplies, contractual support, and other costs identified in the itemized budget. The budget justification should not exceed two consecutively numbered (bottom center), 8.5x11-inch pages of single-spaced, standard 12-point type with 1-inch margins.
Budget information should be supported at the level of detail described below:
- Personnel: List all staff positions by title. Give annual salary, percentage of time assigned to the project, and total cost for the budget period.
- Fringe Benefits: Identify the percentage used and the basis for its computation.
- Travel: Specify the estimated number of trips, locations, and other costs for each type of travel. Explain the need for any travel outside the United States. Include travel funds for annual STAR program progress reviews and a final workshop to report on results.
- Equipment: Identify all tangible, non-expendable personal property to be purchased that has an estimated cost of $5,000 or more per unit and a useful life of more than one year. (Personal property items with a unit cost of less than $5,000 are considered supplies.)
- Supplies: “Supplies” means tangible property other than “equipment”. Identify categories of supplies to be procured (e.g., laboratory supplies or office supplies) and specifically identify computers to be purchased or upgraded.
- Contractual: Identify each proposed sub-agreement (grant or contract) and specify its purpose and estimated cost. Sub-agreements more than $25K should have a separate itemized budget and budget justification, not to exceed one additional page each, included as part of the application.
- Other: List each item in sufficient detail for the EPA to determine the reasonableness of its cost relative to the research to be undertaken.
- Indirect Costs: If indirect costs are included in the budget, indicate the approved rate and base with an explanation of how indirect costs were calculated.
Resumes: Provide resumes for each investigator and important co-worker. The resume for each individual must not exceed two consecutively numbered (bottom center), 8.5x11-inch pages of single-spaced, standard 12-point type with 1-inch margins.
Current and Pending Support: Identify any current and pending financial resources that are intended to support research related to the proposal or that would consume the Principal Investigator’s time. Provide information on current and pending support in the format provided at http://www.epa.gov/ncer/rfa/forms for each investigator and important co-worker.
By submitting an application in response to this solicitation, the applicant grants the EPA permission to make limited disclosures of the application to technical reviewers both within and outside the Agency for the express purpose of assisting the Agency with evaluating the application. Information from a pending or unsuccessful application will be kept confidential to the fullest extent allowed under law; information from a successful application may be publicly disclosed to the extent permitted by law.
In accordance with 40 CFR 2.203, applicants may claim all or a portion of the application/proposal as confidential business information (for example, hypotheses or methodologies contained in the research narrative that the applicant wishes to protect from possible public disclosure). EPA will evaluate confidentiality claims in accordance with 40 CFR Part 2. Applicants must clearly mark applications/proposals or portions of applications/proposals they claim as confidential. If no claim of confidentiality is made, the EPA is not required to make an inquiry to the applicant otherwise required by 40 CFR 2.204(c)(2) prior to disclosure.
Funding Opportunity Number
At various places in the application, applicants are asked to identify the funding opportunity number. The number must be placed at the top of the abstract (location is shown in the abstract format, http://www.epa.gov/ncer/rfa/forms) and in Box 10 of Standard Form 424 for all applications. For paper submissions, the number must also be placed in the address on the package that is sent to the EPA (see below). Each application must be submitted using a single funding opportunity number. The funding opportunity numbers for applications submitted in response to this solicitation are: EPA-G2006-STAR-H1 - Communities and the Built Environment and EPA-G2006-STAR-H2 - Industrial Ecology and Organizational Behavior.
Applicants must select a funding opportunity number corresponding to their proposed project topic area in the solicitation. It is the responsibility of the applicant to identify the proper opportunity number based on the nature of the proposed project. Failure to do so could result in an inappropriate peer review assignment. If your project seems to fit under more than one funding opportunity number, choose the most appropriate one. For electronic submissions, you must use the appropriate electronic application package (see "Submission Instructions for Electronic Applications") for the chosen funding opportunity number.
Letters of Intent/Letters of Support
Letters of intent to provide resources for the proposed project or to specify intended interactions are limited to one brief paragraph committing the availability of a resource (e.g., use of a person's time or equipment) or intended interaction (e.g. sharing of data, as needed consultation) that is described in detail in the Project Plan. Letters of intent are to be included as an addition to the budget justification documents.
All letters that do not commit a resource or specify an intended interaction for the proposed project are considered letters of support. Letters of intent that exceed one brief paragraph and letters of support are considered part of the Project Plan and included in the 15-page Project Plan limit.
For paper copy submissions, the original and two (2) copies of the complete application (3 in all), and one (1) additional copy of the abstract, must be received by NCER no later than 4:00 pm Eastern Time on the solicitation closing date. Electronic applications must be transferred to grants.gov no later than 4:00 pm Eastern Time on the solicitation closing date. It should be noted that this schedule may be changed without prior notification because of factors that were not anticipated at the time of announcement. In the case of a change in the required application closing date, a new date will be posted on the NCER web site (http://www.epa.gov/ncer/) and a modification posted on www.grants.gov . Applications received after the closing date will be returned to the sender without further consideration.
Solicitation Closing Date Date: May 17, 2006, 4:00 pm Eastern Time
Earliest Anticipated Start Date: February 2007
The funding mechanism for all awards issued under STAR solicitations will consist of assistance agreements from the EPA. All award decisions are subject to the availability of funds. In accordance with the Federal Grant and Cooperative Agreement Act, 31 U.S.C. 6301 et seq., the primary purpose of a grant is to accomplish a public purpose of support or stimulation authorized by federal statute, rather than acquisition for the direct benefit or use of the Agency. In issuing a grant agreement, the EPA anticipates that there will be no substantial EPA involvement in the design, implementation, or conduct of the research. However, the EPA will monitor research progress through annual reports provided by grantees and other contacts, including site visits, with the Principal Investigator.
If you wish to submit applications for more than one STAR funding opportunity, you must ensure that the research proposed in each application is significantly different from any other that has been submitted to the EPA or from any other grant you are currently receiving from the EPA or other federal government agency.
Collaborative applications involving more than one institution must be submitted as a single administrative package from one of the institutions involved.
Any contracts for services or products funded with EPA financial assistance must be awarded under the competitive procurement procedures of 40 CFR Part 30. Moreover, naming a specific contractor in the application does not relieve the applicant of its obligations to comply with competitive procurement requirements. Also, the regulations contain limitations on consultant compensation.
Submission Instructions for Paper Applications
The application and abstract must be prepared in accordance with these instructions. The original, signed copy of the application must not be permanently bound or stapled in any way. The other two (2) required copies of the application should be secured with paper or binder clips or secure staples.
Because of security concerns, paper applications cannot be personally delivered. They must be sent through regular mail, express mail, or a major courier.
The following address must be used for regular mail:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Peer Review Division (8725F)
Funding opportunity number: EPA-G2006-STAR-XX (replace the "XX" with the appropriate number)
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington , DC 20460
The following address must be used for express mail and couriers:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Peer Review Division (8725F)
Funding opportunity number: EPA-G2006-STAR-XX (replace the "XX" with the appropriate number)
1025 F Street, NW (Room 3500)
Washington , DC 20004
Phone: (202) 233-0686
Submission Instructions for Electronic Applications Using Grants.gov
The electronic application package available through the http://www.grants.gov/ web site must be used for electronic submissions. In order to view the application package, download the PureEdge viewer (hyperlink available under "Apply for Grants" then "Apply Step 1"). The application package may be quickly accessed from https://apply.grants.gov/forms_apps_idx.html using either the CFDA number of 66.509 or the Funding Opportunity Number: EPA-G2006-STAR-H1 - Communities and the Built Environment and EPA-G2006-STAR-H2 - Industrial Ecology and Organizational Behavior. Be sure to download the electronic application package for the appropriate funding opportunity number or topic. It is recommended that you “Register to Receive Notification” of announcement updates.
The actual submission of an electronic application must be made by an authorized organizational representative (AOR) of the submitting institution who is registered with grants.gov (most individual investigators will not be eligible to submit the application). See http://www.grants.gov/, “Get Started” for further information. The registration process may take a week or longer to complete. Check with your Sponsored Programs or equivalent office to locate your AOR and see if your institution is registered. If your institution is not currently registered, encourage your AOR to begin the process immediately.
The complete application must be transferred to grants.gov no later than 4:00 pm Eastern Time on the solicitation closing date (see “Submission Dates and Times”). An e-mail will be sent by NCER to the Principal Investigator and the Administrative Contact to acknowledge receipt of the application and to transmit other important information. The email will be sent from firstname.lastname@example.org; email to this address will not be accepted. If an email acknowledgment from NCER (not email@example.com) has not been received within 30 days of the submission closing date, immediately contact the Technical Contact listed under “Agency Contacts” in this solicitation. Failure to do so may result in your application not being reviewed.
Documents must be submitted in Adobe Acrobat PDF format to maintain format integrity. Prior to preparing the electronic application package, view files for any PDF conversion errors. Submit the required documents as described below.
On the electronic Grant Application Package page, enter the Principal Investigator’s name, starting with the last name, in the “Application Filing Name” field.
- Application for Federal Assistance (SF-424)
Complete the form. There are no attachments.
- EPA Key Contacts Form 5700-54
- Complete the form.
- If additional pages are needed, see “E. Other Attachments Form” below.
- Project Narrative Attachment Form
- Compile the Research Plan as described above followed by the Quality Assurance Statement into one document labeled ResearchPlanQA and submit it as the “Add Mandatory Project Narrative File”.
- Prepare a document with your abstract, label it Abstract, and submit it as an “Add Optional Project Narrative File”.
- Prepare one document containing all Resumes followed by Current and Pending Support (see format example located at http://www.epa.gov/ncer/rfa/forms/), label it Resumes, and submit it as an “Add Optional Project Narrative File”.
- Prepare a document containing the Data Plan, label it DataPlan, and submit it as an “Add Optional Narrative File”.
- Budget Narrative Attachment Form
- Where possible, prepare one document for your Budget and Budget Justification (see format example located at http://www.epa.gov/ncer/rfa/forms/), label this document BudgetAndJustification, and submit it as the “Add Mandatory Budget Narrative”.
- If you cannot compile your Budget and Budget Justification into one document, prepare one document for each.
- Label your Budget document Budget and submit it as the “Add Mandatory Budget Narrative”.
- Label the Budget Justification document BudgetJustification and submit it as an “Add Optional Budget Narrative” document.
- When submitting letters of intent, first refer to the “Letters of Intent/Letters of Support” paragraph under Section IV. H. (Guidelines, Limitations and Additional Requirements) for additional information. Letters of intent appropriate for inclusion in the budget justification are to be compiled into one document named LettersofIntent and submitted as an “Add Optional Budget Narrative” document.
- Other Attachments Form
- If Key Contacts Continuation pages are needed for the Key Contacts Form 5700-54, compile them into one document labeled ContactsContinuation and submit the document.
- Other appropriate documents may also be submitted here.
Once the application package has been completed, the “Submit” button will become active. Save your completed application package with two different file names before providing it to your AOR to avoid having to re-create the package should submission problems be experienced. Submission of the application package must be completed by your AOR.
Close all other software before attempting to submit the application package. If you experience submission problems, reboot your computer (turning the power off may be necessary) and re-attempt the submission. If submission problems continue, contact grants.gov for assistance (Phone: 1-800-518-4726, Email: firstname.lastname@example.org ). If submission problems are not quickly resolved, contact the NCER electronic submission support person, Bronda Harrison (Phone: 202-564-1790, Email: email@example.com).
- Identification of Problem or Opportunity
Applicants are encouraged to clearly articulate the problem or opportunity they are addressing and how it relates to sustainability. Applicants are further encouraged to describe how their project will result in improved planning or decision-making (at the local, state, regional, or industrial levels) and to explain who will benefit from this work. Applications will be evaluated to the extent they:
- Address a significant issue of emerging and/or long term regional importance
- Network and strengthen existing projects (in States, cities, industry, etc.) to make a whole greater than the sum of the parts
- Focus on preventive approaches
Applicants are encouraged to clearly specify the science (including social science) or engineering they will use and how they will use it. The ideal project will explore a new approach to use current science or engineering for forward-looking environmental policy or decision-making in the public or private sector. Applications will be evaluated to the extent they:
- Describe the collection and/or synthesis of scientifically relevant data or information
- Apply science (including social science) or engineering to long-term, preventative, systems-oriented environmental protection
- Link the science (including social science) or engineering to policy or decision-making at the national, local, state, or industrial level
Applicants are encouraged to define success in the environmental, economic, and social dimensions. Applicants are encouraged to address environmental improvement, whether it is through reduced impact, more effective use of materials, healthier ecosystem functioning, or other measures. Applicants should also include measures in the economic and social dimensions. Finally, applicants are encouraged to collect and/or use data to measure and track progress towards defined success over the short and long term. Applications will be evaluated to the extent they:
- Define short- and long-term outcomes in the environmental, economic, and social dimensions
- Provide a credible plan for tracking progress towards these outcomes, including identification of relevant data and information
The qualifications of the Principal Investigator(s) and other key personnel, including applicable training and demonstrated knowledge and experience to complete the project in both science/engineering and decision-making. Will all key personnel make a significant time commitment to the project?
Proposals should identify collaborative partners and their roles in the overall project. Applications will be evaluated to the extent they identify:
- Collaborative partner(s) responsible for science or engineering expertise
- Collaborative partner(s) responsible for policy, planning, or decision-making expertise
- An approach for enabling effective collaboration, including sharing relevant data and information
Applications will be evaluated to the extent they present an effective plan for transferring tools, approaches and lessons to other states, localities, regions, or industries. This includes a plan to make all relevant data and information accessible and available to the public (where appropriate, protecting privacy or property rights), so that the data may be used by other researchers and specialists.
The facilities, budget and schedule proposed for the project will be evaluated for appropriateness and/or adequacy. Questions to be addressed include: Are there any deficiencies that may interfere with the successful completion of the project? Is the schedule and budget reasonable for the proposed activities and include milestones for the project period? Although budget information does not reflect on the application's scientific merit, the reviewers are asked to provide their view on the appropriateness and/or adequacy of the proposed budget and its implications for the potential success of the proposed project. Input on requested equipment is of particular interest.
Review and Selection Process
All applications are reviewed by an appropriate external technical peer review panel using the criteria above. In general, each peer review group is composed of non-EPA scientists, engineers, social scientists, and/or economists who are experts in their respective areas and proficient in the technical subjects they are reviewing. Reviewers are asked to assign a summary score of excellent, very good, good, fair, or poor to each application. This review is designed to evaluate each application according to its scientific merit and relevance to decision-making.
Applications receiving scores of excellent or very good as a result of the peer review process will then undergo an internal programmatic review, as described below, conducted by technical experts from the EPA, including individuals from the Office of Research and Development (ORD) and program and regional offices involved with the science or engineering proposed. All other applications are automatically declined.
In addition, after the peer review, those applicants who received scores of excellent or very good as a result of the peer review process will be asked to provide additional information pertaining to the proposed Lead Principal Investigator's (PI) "Past Performance and Reporting History."
The applicant must provide the EPA Project Officer with information on the proposed Lead PI's past performance under prior Federal agency assistance agreements in terms of: (i) the level of success in performing each agreement, and (ii) how progress towards achieving the results intended under each agreement was reported. This information is required only for the proposed Lead PI's performance under Federal assistance agreements initiated within the last three years that were similar in size and scope to the proposed project. The specific information that will be required is shown below, and must be provided within three weeks of EPA's request. A maximum of three pages is permitted for the response; pages in excess of three will not be reviewed. Note: If no prior past performance information exists, please state this.
- Name of Granting Agency.
- Grant/Cooperative agreement number.
- Grant/Cooperative agreement title.
- Brief description of the grant/cooperative agreement.
- A description of how the agreement is similar in size and scope to the proposed project and whether or not it was successfully performed; if not successfully performed, provide an explanation.
- Information relating to the proposed Lead PI's past performance in reporting on progress towards achieving the expected results (outputs/outcomes) under the agreement, and if such progress was not made, an explanation of whether, and how, this was reported.
- Total (all years) grant/cooperative agreement dollar value.
- Project period.
- Technical contact (project officer), telephone number, and E-mail address (if available).
The internal programmatic review panel will consider:
- The relevance of the proposed project to EPA research, programmatic, and regional priorities.
- The proposed Lead PI's past performance (under Federal agency assistance agreements initiated within the last three years that were similar in size and scope to the proposed project) in two areas: First, in successfully performing these prior Federal assistance projects, including whether there is a satisfactory explanation for any lack of success. Second, in reporting progress towards achieving results under these agreements, including the proposed Lead PI's history of submitting timely progress/final technical reports that adequately describe the progress toward achieving the expected results (outputs/outcomes) under the agreements. Any explanation of why progress towards achieving the results was not made will also be considered. Applicants whose proposed Lead PI has no relevant past performance history, or for whom this information is not available, will be evaluated neither favorably nor unfavorably on past performance.
- The applicant's organizational experience.
The purpose of the programmatic review is to assure an integrated project portfolio for the Agency and help determine which applications to recommend for award. In conducting the programmatic review, the EPA will consider information provided by the applicant and may consider information from other sources, including prior and current grantors and agency files (e.g., to verify and/or supplement the information provided by the applicants).
Final funding decisions are made by the NCER Director based on the results of the peer review, internal programmatic review and overall program balance. In addition, in making the final funding decisions, the NCER Director may also consider available funds and the Congressionally-mandated Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research (EPSCOR) (see http://www.epa.gov/ncer/other/). Overall, CNS is aiming to have a program that is balanced across resources, systems, geographic regions, degrees of intellectual risk, and scientific approaches.
Applicants selected for funding will be required to provide additional information listed below under "Award Notices." The application will then be forwarded to EPA's grants administration office for award in accordance with the EPA's procedures.
Customarily, applicants are notified about award decisions within six months of the application closing date. A summary statement of the scientific review by the peer panel will be provided to each applicant with an award or declination letter. After selection for award, applicants recommended for funding will be required to submit additional certifications and an electronic version of the revised project abstract. They may also be asked to provide responses to comments or suggestions offered by the peer reviewers, a revised budget, and/or to resubmit their proposal. EPA Project Officers will contact Principal Investigators to obtain these materials.
Several topics may be included in the negotiations conducted prior to award, including formal identification of key personnel. Where a cooperative agreement is appropriate, the EPA Project Officer will negotiate with applicants to describe the nature of any collaboration with EPA scientists, engineers or environmental specialists. The purpose of this negotiation is to ensure all aspects of the collaboration are clearly understood by the affected parties. Possible topics for collaboration that will be discussed at that time include, but are not limited to: Life Cycle Analysis Methods, Environmental Impact Assessment Models, Material Flow Analysis Methods, Green Chemistry and Green Engineering Applications, Urban Stormwater Management, Economic Valuation Methods, Integrated Systems Modeling, and Land Revitalization.
Nonprofit applicants recommended for funding under this announcement will be subject to a preaward administrative capability review consistent with sections 8.b, 8.c, and 9.d of EPA Order 5700.8, EPA Policy on Assessing Capabilities of Non-Profit Applicants for Managing Assistance Awards (http://www.epa.gov/ogd/grants/regulations.htm).
The official notification of an award will be made by the Agency’s Grants Administration Division. Applicants are cautioned that only a grants officer can bind the Government to the expenditure of funds; preliminary selection by the NCER Director in the Office of Research and Development does not guarantee an award will be made. Before or after an award, applicants may be required to provide additional quality assurance documentation.
Disputes related to this assistance agreement competition will be resolved in accordance with the dispute resolution procedures set forth in 70 FR 3629, 3630 (January 26, 2005) which can be found at http://www.epa.gov/ogd/competition/resolution.htm. Questions regarding disputes may be referred to the Eligibility Contact identified below.
Administrative and National Policy Requirements
Expectations and responsibilities of NCER grantees are summarized in this section. See http://www.epa.gov/ncer/guidance for the full terms and conditions associated with an award, including which activities require prior approval from the EPA.
- Meetings: Principal Investigators will be expected to budget for, and participate in, All-Investigators Meetings (also known as progress reviews) approximately once per year with EPA scientists and other grantees to report on research activities and discuss issues of mutual interest.
- Approval of Changes after Award: Prior written approval is required from the EPA if there will be significant change from work described in the application. Examples of these changes are contained in 40 C.F.R. 30.25. Note: prior written approval is also required from the EPA for incurring costs more than 90 calendar days prior to award.
- Human Subjects: A grant recipient must agree to meet all EPA requirements for studies using human subjects prior to implementing any work with these subjects. These requirements are given in 40 C.F.R. 26, referred to as the “Common Rule”. No work involving human subjects, including recruiting, may be initiated before the EPA has received a copy of the applicant’s Institutional Review Board’s (IRB) approval of the project and the EPA has also provided approval. Where human subjects are involved in the research, the recipient must provide evidence of subsequent IRB reviews, including amendments or minor changes of protocol, as part of annual reports. Until further notice, applications involving intentional dosing of human subjects will not be considered for award by EPA.
- Animal Welfare: A grant recipient must agree to comply with the Animal Welfare Act of 1966 (P.L. 89-544), as amended, 7 U.S.C. 2131-2156. The recipient must also agree to abide by the “U.S. Government Principles for the Utilization and Care of Vertebrate Animals used in Testing, Research, and Training” (50 Federal Register 20864-20865. May 20,1985).
- Data Access and Information Release: After award, all data (including primary and secondary/existing data) must be made available to the NCER Project Officer without restriction and be accompanied by comprehensive metadata documentation adequate for specialists and nonspecialists alike to be able to understand how and where the data were obtained and to evaluate the quality of the data. If requested, the data products and their metadata must be provided to the NCER Project Officer in a standard exchange format no later than the due date of the grant's final report or the publication of the data product's associated results, whichever comes first.
- Reporting: A grant recipient must agree to provide annual progress reports, with associated summaries for posting on NCER’s web site, and a final report with an executive summary for web posting.
- Acknowledgement of EPA Support: EPA’s full or partial support must be acknowledged in journal articles, oral or poster presentations, news releases, interviews with reporters and other communications. Any documents developed under the agreement for distribution to the public or inclusion in a scientific, technical, or other journal shall include the following statement:
This publication [article] was developed under a STAR Research Assistance Agreement No. __________ awarded by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. It has not been formally reviewed by the EPA. The views expressed in this document are solely those of [name of recipient] and the EPA does not endorse any products or commercial services mentioned in this publication.
Congress, through OMB, has instructed each federal agency to implement Information Quality Guidelines designed to "provide policy and procedural guidance...for ensuring and maximizing the quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of information, including statistical information, disseminated by Federal agencies." The EPA's implementation may be found at http://www.epa.gov/quality/informationguidelines/. These procedures may apply to data generated by grant recipients if those data are disseminated as described in the Guidelines.
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-110 has been revised to provide public access to research data through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) under some circumstances. Data that are (1) first produced in a project that is supported in whole or in part with federal funds and (2) cited publicly and officially by a federal agency in support of an action that has the force and effect of law (i.e., a regulation) may be accessed through FOIA. If such data are requested by the public, the EPA must ask for it, and the grantee must submit it, in accordance with A-110 and the EPA regulations at 40 C.F.R. 30.36.
A grant recipient must agree to provide copies of any peer reviewed journal article(s) resulting from the research during the project period. In addition, the recipient should notify the EPA Project Officer of any papers published after completion of the grant that are based on research supported by the grant. NCER posts references to all publications resulting from a grant on the NCER web site.
A graphic that can be converted to a slide or used in other ways, such as on a poster, is located at http://www.epa.gov/ncer/guidance/star_images.html. EPA expects recipients to use this graphic in oral and poster presentations.
Further information, if needed, may be obtained from the EPA officials indicated below. Information regarding this RFA obtained from sources other than these Agency Contacts may not be accurate. Email inquiries are preferred.
Eligibility Contact: Tom Barnwell: 202-343-9862; email: (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Electronic Submissions: Bronda Harrison: 202-564-1790; email: (email@example.com)
Technical Contact: Diana Bauer: Phone: 202-343-9759; email: (firstname.lastname@example.org)