Jump to main content.


 Research Highlights

Technology Performance Summary: Anachemia C2 Kit for Toxic Industrial Chemicals

This document does not constitute nor should be construed as an EPA endorsement of any particular product, service, or technology.

All Hazards Receipt Facilities (AHRFs) were developed to prescreen for chemical, radiochemical, and explosive hazards in samples collected during suspected terrorist attacks. The technologies used in AHRFs are intended to screen samples prior to a full analysis, helping protect responders, laboratory workers, and others from potential injury.

Evaluations of these technologies are summarized in the technology evaluation report, Testing of Screening Technologies for Detection of Toxic Industrial Chemicals in All Hazards Receipt Facilities. The toxic industrial chemicals (TICs) included in the report were chosen because they might be used during, or develop as a by-product from, a terrorist attack.

The screening technologies are intended:

  • To be rapid and qualitative
  • To be simple to use and of relatively low cost
  • To indicate if samples contain hazardous chemicals of concern.

Not all of the technologies evaluated were deemed suitable for the AHRF, although they might be useful for responders on the scene.

Technology Evaluated: Anachemia C2 KitExit EPA Disclaimer

Sample Types Evaluated for Indication of: Hydrogen cyanide, cyanogen chloride, and phosgene in vapor

Conclusions:
The Anachemia C2 Kit:

  • Did not reliably detect hydrogen cyanide, cyanogen chloride, or phosgene.
  • Uses a relatively complex procedure (for some analytes) of breaking tube, inserting into pump, drawing sample, and then adding reagent to tube.
  • Response time was in minutes.

Technology Description and Requirements: This technology consists of color-indicating tubes and a hand pump for drawing the required sample volume through each tube. Ten compressions of the pump provided the required sample volume.

Testing Methodology and Results: Testing was conducted on one TIC at a time. The tested gases were generated by diluting a commercially obtained compressed gas standard. To evaluate the detector, a flow of clean air passed through a clean air plenum, and an equal flow of air containing the tested gas passed through another plenum: the challenge plenum. The instrument was connected to a 4-way valve, through which clean air or the tested gas flowed before being vented into a chemical laboratory hood. The technology was first exposed to the clean air flow. After this, the 4-way valve was switched to the challenge plenum to deliver the TIC gas. The sequence of exposure to clean air, followed by exposure to the TIC gas, was carried out three times in succession. This sequence was followed for each TIC and condition identified in Table 1. For this evaluation, a hydrocarbon mixture interferent was added to the blank, or TIC gas, at a ratio of 1:100 interferent mix to air flow.

Table 1: Summary of Anachemia C2 Kit Test Results

Sample Type TICa Test Conditionb Level of concern (Basis)c Presence Detected (Pass) Presence Not Detected (Fail)

Vapor

Hydrogen cyanide Base 17 ppm ~ 18.7 mg/m3 (AEGL-2 value)   X
Phosgene Base 0.6 ppm ~ 2.4 mg/m3 (AEGL-2 value)   X
Cyanogen chloride Base 0.4 ppm ~ 1 mg/m3 (TEEL-2 value)   X

aA hydrocarbon mixture was used as the interferent.
bTemperature and relative humidity conditions for vapor tests were: Base = 20 °C and 50% relative humidity.
cAEGL = Acute Exposure Guide Level and TEEL = Temporary Emergency Exposure Limit.


See Also
Testing of Screening Technologies for Detection of Toxic Industrial Chemicals in All Hazards Receipt Facilities (PDF) (50 pp, 1 MB) (EPA/600/R-08/034) March 2008

Contact: Eric Koglin

Feedback/Questions


You will need Adobe Reader to view some of the files on this page.
See EPA's PDF page to learn more.


Local Navigation


Jump to main content.