Research Highlights
Technology Performance Summary: Sensidyne Gas Detector Tubes for Toxic Industrial ChemicalsThis document does not constitute nor should be construed as an EPA endorsement of any particular product, service, or technology.All Hazards Receipt Facilities (AHRFs) were developed to prescreen for chemical, radiochemical, and explosive hazards in samples collected during suspected terrorist attacks. The technologies used in AHRFs are intended to screen samples prior to a full analysis, helping protect responders, laboratory workers, and others from potential injury. Evaluations of these technologies are summarized in the technology evaluation report, Testing of Screening Technologies for Detection of Toxic Industrial Chemicals in All Hazards Receipt Facilities. The toxic industrial chemicals (TICs) included in the report were chosen because they might be used during, or develop as a by-product from, a terrorist attack. The screening technologies are intended:
Not all of the technologies evaluated were deemed suitable for the AHRF, although they might be useful for responders on the scene. Technology Evaluated: Sensidyne Gas Detector Tubes Sample Types Evaluated for Indication of: Hydrogen cyanide, phosgene, arsine, chlorine, and hydrogen sulfide in vapor Conclusions:
Technology Description and Requirements: Instrument provides quantitative readings. Single- use glass tubes containing reagents that change color when a suitable volume of air containing the appropriate target chemical is drawn through the tube. A hand pump is used to draw the correct amount of sample through one tube at a time. One compression of the hand pump provides the 100-mL volume of sample air required by the vendor’s instructions. Testing Methodology and Results: Testing was conducted on one TIC at a time. The tested gases were generated by diluting a commercially obtained compressed gas standard. To evaluate the detector, a flow of clean air passed through a clean air plenum, and an equal flow of air containing the tested gas passed through another plenum: the challenge plenum. The instrument was connected to a 4-way valve, through which clean air or the tested gas flowed before being vented into a chemical laboratory hood. The technology was first exposed to the clean air flow. After this, the 4-way valve was switched to the challenge plenum to deliver the TIC gas. The sequence of exposure to clean air, followed by exposure to the TIC gas, was carried out three times in succession. For this evaluation, a hydrocarbon mixture interferent was added to the blank, or TIC gas, at a ratio of 1:100 interferent mix to air flow. Table 1: Summary of Sensidyne Gas Detector Tubes Test Results
aA hydrocarbon mixture was used as the interferent.
Contact: Eric Koglin You will need Adobe Reader to view some of the files on this page. |
![[logo] US EPA](http://www.epa.gov/epafiles/images/logo_epaseal.gif)