Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE)
Note: EPA no longer updates this information, but it may be useful as a reference or resource.
|Demonstration of the AquaBlok Sediment Capping Technology
AquaBlok is an innovative, proprietary, clay polymer composite developed by AquaBlok, Ltd., of Toledo, OH, and represents an alternative to traditional sediment capping materials, such as sand. It is designed to swell and form a continuous and highly impermeable isolation barrier between contaminated sediments and the overlying water column. It claims superior impermeability, stability, and erosion resistance and general cost-competitiveness relative to more traditional capping materials.
AquaBlok is generally marketed as a non-specific capping material that could encapsulate any class or type of contaminant and any range of contaminant concentration. Although the manufacturer claims there is no practicable limit to the depth at which the material would function, AquaBlok is typically formulated to function in relatively shallow, freshwater to brackish, near-shore environments. It is commonly comprised of bentonite clay with polymer additives covering a small aggregate core. Other specific formulations of AquaBlok are available:
Under EPA’s Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Program, the effectiveness of AquaBlok as an innovative contaminated sediment capping technology was evaluated in the Anacostia River in Washington, DC. Sediments in the Anacostia River are contaminated with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, polychlorinated biphenyls, heavy metals, and other chemicals at levels that have hindered commercial, industrial, and recreational uses. The performance of AquaBlok was assessed by monitoring an AquaBlok cap over about three years using a multitude of invasive or noninvasive sampling and monitoring tools. The performance of AquaBlok was compared to the performance of a traditional sand cap relative to three fundamental study objectives. Control sediments were also monitored to provide critical context to the data evaluations.
The study objectives were to determine, relative to the traditional sand cap material, the:
There were field data collection issues and inherent data uncertainties within the SITE demonstration that limit the usefulness of certain data and minimized the power of certain evaluations and interpretations. The conclusions of the demonstration must be reviewed in this context. However, the overall results of the AquaBlok SITE demonstration indicate that the AquaBlok material is highly stable and likely more stable than traditional sand capping material, even under very high bottom shear stresses.
The AquaBlok material is also characteristically more impermeable and the weight of evidence gathered suggests it is potentially more effective at controlling contaminant flux than traditional sand capping material. AquaBlok also appears to be characterized by impacts to benthos and benthic habitat generally similar to traditional sand capping material.