Jump to main content.


Español  Research Highlights

 

Technology Assessment for Investigating Future Air Quality

Podcasts

Listen to or download the podcast to learn more about how NRMRL research helps to support the protection of human health and the environment.

Listen to this Research Highlight  Subscribe to podcasts

Population growth, economic expansion, and energy resource constraints are just a few of the stressors posing new challenges for maintaining air quality in the future. Addressing these trends and identifying future risks to the global climate are crucial to the preservation of the environment and human health. To support the agency's climate change research, EPA's National Risk Management Research Laboratory (NRMRL) has established the Energy and Climate Assessment Team (ECAT). The ECA team is a multi-disciplinary group that assesses emerging energy and pollution mitigation technologies and their potential effect on harmful emissions. With a focus on the energy and transportation sectors, ECAT helps EPA to better understand how technological evolution can impact future air quality.

Background

Renewable energy using a wind turbine
Renewable energy using a wind turbine

In the past century, human impacts on the Earth have increased with population growth, changing technologies, and growing energy dependence. The global demand for energy and transportation is met largely through the combustion of fossil fuels, a major source of greenhouse gases and criteria pollutants. Coal, for example, the largest contributor of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, poses a concern as coal-fired power plants are being built at an unprecedented rate. Mitigating fossil fuel emissions has become a priority as policymakers have looked to the science community for technology to reduce the associated risks.

The MARKAL Model

ECA researchers consider economic, social, and technological factors in assessing potentially cleaner technologies. Example technologies include:

  • Advanced nuclear reactors
  • Wind, solar, and biomass energy technology
  • Coal gasification technology
  • Hydrogen fuel cell vehicles

A number of tools are used to analyze the potential effects of these technologies, including the MARKAL model. MARKAL, short for MARket ALlocation, is a model that represents an energy system from the extraction or import of fuels, through their conversion to useful forms, to their use in meeting end-use service demands. To apply MARKAL, ECA researchers have developed databases representing the major sectors in the US energy system. The EPA National MARKAL Database (EPANMD) covers the nation as a single region and includes the commercial, industrial, residential, transportation, and electricity generation sectors. The EPA Nine Region MARKAL Database (EPAUS9r) includes the same sectors, but with regional representation within the nine Census divisions. Both databases project energy supply and demand through 2050.

Using these MARKAL databases and other models, the ECA team is able to investigate a wide range of scenarios, allowing for different variables in future technology characteristics, fuel costs, and energy policies to assess the potential impact of specific technologies on future air quality. For example, wind turbines can be evaluated and compared to conventional coal for meeting electricity demands. Interactions that may shift emissions across sectors are also captured. For example, hydrogen production from natural gas to power fuel cell vehicles can be studied for any fuel switching in the electric generation or industrial sector as demand for natural gas increases.

Through these and other tools, NRMRL science is aiding the evolution of energy technology in emissions-intensive sectors of the United States economy. While emerging technologies may have higher costs and greater operational uncertainties than current technologies, ECAT's research provides policymakers with a solid scientific foundation for proactive decisions.

Contact

Jane Ice, NRMRL Office of Public Affairs (513) 569-7311

dotted rule

Hot off the Presses—NRMRL Publications Exit EPA Disclaimer

Barth, E.F., D. Reible and A. Bullard. (2008). “Evaluation of the Physical Stability, Ground Water Seepage Control, and Faunal Changes Associated With an AquaBlok® Sediment Cap.” Remediation, 18, 4: 63-70.

Boczek, L., C. Johnson and M. Meckes. (2008). “Chlorine Disinfection of Wet Weather Managed Flows.” In: Proceedings Water Environment Federation Technical Exhibition and Conference, Chicago, IL, October 18-22.

Gullett, B.K., A. Touati and L. Oudejans. (2008). “PCDD/F and Aromatic Emissions from Simulated Forest and Grassland Fires.” Atmospheric Environment, 42, 34: 7997-8006.

Hayes, S.L., M. Sivaganesan, K.M. White and S.L. Pfaller. (2008). “Assessing the Effectiveness of Low-Pressure Ultraviolet Light for Inactivating Mycobacterium Avium Complex (MAC) Micro-Organisms.” Letters in Applied Microbiology, 47, 5: 386–392.

Meckes, M.C. (2008). “Monitoring Process Effectiveness.” In: Proceedings WEFTEC 2008, Chicago, IL, October 18–22.

Yong-Jin, L., M. Molina, J.W. Santo-Domingo, J.D. Willis, M. Cyterski, D.M. Endale and O.C. Shanks. (2008). “Temporal Assessment of the Impact of Exposure to Cow Feces inTwo Watersheds by Multiple Host-Specific PCR Assays.” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 74, 22: 6839–6847.

EPA Reports and Resources

Use of Sediment Core Profiling in Assessing Effectiveness of Monitored Natural Recovery (PDF) (8 pp, 1.26 MB) (EPA/600/S-08/014) August 2008

Mine Waste Technology Program, In Situ Source Control Of Acid Generation Using Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria (PDF) (77 pp, 655 KB) (EPA/600/R-08/096) June 2008 – Abstract

Evaluation of Receiving Water Improvements from Stream Restoration (Accotink Creek, Fairfax City, VA) (PDF) (69 pp, 2.05 MB) (EPA/600/R-08/110) September 2008 – Abstract

Comparison of the Alternative Asbestos Control Method and the NESHAP Method for Demolition of Asbestos-Containing Buildings (PDF) (229 pp, 8.46 MB) (EPA/600/R-08/094) October 2008 – Abstract


You will need Adobe Reader to view some of the files on this page.
See EPA's PDF page to learn more.


Local Navigation


Jump to main content.