Simulation Models Evaluation of Pest Resistance Development to Refuge in the Bag
Concepts Related to Pioneer Submission version 1.0 (30 pp, 211 KB) (EPA/600/R-10/055) January 2010
Introduction
The USEPA, under its administration of the Federal Insecticide Fungicide and Rodenticide Act
(FIFRA), requires the registration of all pesticides and pesticidal materials. The GM crops containing
pesticidal traits are subject to FIFRA registration requirements. Concerns relating to future
environmental effects of these crops can be investigated only using simulation models. Model
application in this instance offers an analysis of the useful lifetime for the pesticidal traits. USEPA has
clearly supported the use of these traits as replacements of broad spectrum pesticides that have
significant environmental footprints.
Background
Resistance management (RM) simulation models are designed as deterministic, stochastic, and
spatially explicit analytical methodologies. Simulation models can provide a realistic assessment of the
risk of resistance evolution given the allele frequencies used as initial conditions. New concepts of PIP
crop deployment such as refuge-in-the-bag require a detailed evaluation to ensure the claims associated
with each concept offer the sustainable protection of the crop. Simulation models offer a means to
evaluate the threat of crop loss through the development of resistance in the near future.
Purpose
This collaborative research effort was designed to evaluate the relative merit of refuge-in-bag
concepts as submitted by Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. This research specifically analyzed the
relative risks related to the control of western corn rootworm in block refuge deployment and 5% seedmixture
scenarios.
Research Design
To understand the relative risks related to the evolution of resistance in western corn rootworm
between the currently mandated block refuge deployment and a 5% seed-mixture deployment as
submitted Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc., two different models were developed and evaluated. The
two models consisted of a modification of a spatially-explicit stochastic model (Caprio et al. 2006) and
a simpler, frequency-based deterministic model. The latter could be run in a single simulation mode
with a graphical interface to enter parameters or in a risk-assessment mode capable of running
thousands of simulations to estimate the effects of parameter uncertainty. Realistic estimates for
several parameters using in the deterministic model were developed through use of the stochastic
model.
Impacts and Outcomes
This research was designed to provide substantive information about the operation and
capabilities of different resistance management models to assist the regulatory expert in its proper use
and interpretation of results.
Contact
John Glaser
You will need Adobe Reader to view some of the files on this page.
See EPA's PDF page to learn more. |