ÿWPCd %œU«wà‚(y5H®{°SE˜h)ý ¿à>†§N܇ ðíBéw½e¡\ÆüõzƒT0…ú>-)GôÃxå£iKËPDX‰›dؼÝm@3}ÓÙ¡¢6†ëk#ÿ3ë÷ðP´Ås'&C''ðÒÖ¬¿ÄŽkÚƒÖŽÖ@èµý®´Ñ”cÐL ç«}h'À.¢èz¿`ïÔÜ”û³ºÑùAss6%ž‰\›dCµ u "ê훊ywyĈ^WúûçI¦ag«hßþuþR§.ê}‰õ>ÐkJ±C”æ€wä¹M"1 ý”â(º}ˆ8öøÏ1SýG88¾‚ é`dû;¸"Ìî°÷=&­yîÉËEØò¥t!§1á òßÛX"µK Ñõ›u´KÛêØ tJ oÎg;Ðu?PΙؚ±_-T  ˜&É3Ô[8”×F^¾¸û==õ‘V ÝRð ÷¡•l¡ä¾þ§»!ļ&¯ä¹ŒyÍa»OBò‹)–%ÇKœHHÙ§ñƒ{€¸ËšÙúöv4c‡8?½mh<6ŽÌ¡­B¿°-Q*‹Ü¡QåB—Œ>ð1‡X.äô4ê7ä&S·u™ÌDç$ž]ž:‹UNp %¾Ä 04Ôw@4P(ÈhH  Z ‹6Times New Roman RegularX3|xi( ¤T$¡¡Ó  Ó `EabDcdeDfghDiD>)%Ý ƒ¤T!ÝÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÑ7€]¶XXdðXXdð7Ñà€îî?(#àAttachment€2ˆÐ ° ÐÌÌà@EE&ìàò òòòQuestionsóóó óˆÐ €Ð ÐÌQuestions€for€consideration€in€developing€ideas€for€a€new€applicability€approach€are€listedÏbelow:ÌÌ1.à0  àWould€grandfathering€end€on€a€fixed€calendar€date?€€How€would€EPA€and€the€StatesÐ 0 € Ðverify€€evidence€(via€a€permit)€of€€compliance€by€the€several€thousand€sources€subject€toÏthe€requirements€as€of€a€particular€point€in€time?€€Would€some€other€triggeringÏmechanism€be€employed€such€as€the€expected€life€of€the€facility€or€oldest€emissions€units,Ïor€the€first€modification€after€a€fixed€date,€or€some€combination€of€these?€Ð (#(# ÐÌ2.€€à0  àIf€grandfathering€were€to€end€on€a€fixed€date€what€would€that€date€be?ÐÐ (#(# ÐÌ3.€€à0  àWhat,€exactly,€triggers€NSR€at€the€end€date?€€The€mere€reaching€of€that€date,€or€someÐ ° Ðevent€at€the€source€after€the€end€date€such€as€a€physical€modification?Ð (#(# ÐÌ4.€€à0  àWhat,€exactly,€is€the€obligation€when€NSR€is€eventually€triggered?€€BACT€or€LAERÐ €Ð Ðdepending€on€area€attainment€status?€€Could€the€fact€that€a€unit€installed€BACT/LAER€inÏthe€past€influence€the€technology€requirement,€and€if€so,€by€how€much?Ð (#(# ÐÌ5.€€à0  àIs€a€presumptive€BACT/€LAER€requirement€feasible?€€What€mechanisms€can€EPA€use€toÐ @ Ðensure€that€control€technologies€and€pollution€prevention€evolve?€€For€example€are€thereÏways€to€get€more€submittals€to€the€RACT/BACT/LAER€Clearinghouse?Ð (#(# ÐÌ6.€€à0  àIs€there€a€statutory€basis€for€such€an€approach?€€Are€there€related€issues€that€in€order€toÐ P Ðresolve€will€lead€to€a€test€that€is€as€complex€as€the€existing€one?Ð (#(# ÐÌ7.€€à0  àWhat€other€alternatives€to€this€approach€should€be€considered?€€These€might€includeÐ Ð  Ðdeclining€emission€caps€or€other€market-based€approaches€which€set€an€area„wide,Ïstatewide,€or€regional€emissions€cap€at€a€certain€level€at€a€certain€point€in€time,€whñ`ññ_ñlñ_ññ`ññañileñaññbñbutñbñ€stillÏguardñcñingñcñ€against€local€adverse€impactsñdñ.ñdññeñ€by€increases€in€given€locations€should€be€considered?ñeñÐ (#(# ÐÌ8.€€à0  àHow€does€the€new€approach€for€€NSR€fit€with€efforts€to€encourage€utilities€to€voluntarilyÐ €%Ð # Ðincrease€efficiencies€of€generating€electric€power€and€engage€in€other€carbon€emissionÏreduction€efforts?Ð (#(# ÐÌ€9.€€à0  àCan€ñfñsuch€ñfñañgñnñgññhñ€givenñhñ€approach€be€supported€by€a€sufficiently€wide€number€of€stakeholder€groupsÐ @)$' Ðto€conclude€that€it€has€a€significant€chance€for€being€promulgated€in€a€reasonable€timeÏframe?Ð (#(# ÐÐ ,`'* ÐñiñÐ  ° Ðñiñ10.à  àIf€there€is€widespread€support€for€a€new€applicability€test€and€EPA€decides€to€move€Ð ° Ðà  àforward,€how€should€the€EPA€handle€some€of€the€non„applicability€issues€addressed€in€¼à  àthe€current€NSR€Reform€rulemaking?ÌÌ11.à  àShould€this€approach€be€mandatory?€€Should€it€completely€replace€the€current€system€orÐ pÀ Ðà  àbe€a€discretionary€option?ÌÌ12.à  àWhat€are€the€consequences,€either€positive€or€negative€of€ending€netting?