WPCƬ AmF[T‹, d]a#C&SV|*v$S'e\5(Aړ gן$Y}7='Na^5n۴ouS3}~od6+ X)MPh`j2PVL]$~J;EM!8}mRPe f;=\8TyWR- h#d@<,ƣ}SuMN\;rc&%M.KVQ985@d>˫}`p<;7z.0KyЗݖ5'鏕~ۗ.kcqs6Bg'}{^K;]ONS&a=z)6' > \%nW\Z<+8/UJfU3'z hZ&Ol 7gzæjܷXE}~   h, 0%A UN- UF{  D3   B 0eTUFf h aN+y hyf  h DCUJ A C 0 B B  B A AMU4 % 0K D3! AT @ o pVX0 AYG 0,Zh h$f, h$.# R B-]fP 0FR 1mak 0 |pf 0~a 0gfaa%b9 0LGUFbُUFݏ hJ# 0m 0# h7ّUFUFV hw@4 h D3f/f1a3aG h[ haa 0Cgggggggfa 0 D+Ȕ 0 0Cn AMN 0LLfa B* B/AAAf^^a`ftavUFfЫaҫUF 0, E)"XYXX"X"XYXX"XY   @ CXXX"XYPSDandNonattainmentNSRReformDRAFTICRApril1996   +68(Vm$0   9 Z6Times New Roman Regular<L4 9Z .Courier New Regular  aMa$"XYXX"X"XYXX"XY  "hX"XY  1  8   StateandRegionalstaffestimatedtheimpactofthe"CleanUnits"exemptionseparatelyfromthis  analysis.Iftheirresultsareused,theseimpactsare5and8percentfornonattainmentNSRandPSDrespectively.ThisICRthereforeusedthemoreconservative5%acrossbothprograms. 'dxd3|x='  d(,!$0  0` (#(#  < 9Z .Courier New Regular-j-@------p@-b@-@P---{@-8@- @--, @ @@P-,@ @@P-,A @@P-,H=A 0P--F@P-F@P-F@P-F@P--,QTA @@P-,LQA @@P-,@w[A @@P-,WpA @@P-,@-{AP- - ,f @@P- - - I@- N@- @U@- - ,GzG@ @@- ,333333@ @@- ,iiiiiim@ @@- - [@- q@- $@--,@ @@P-, @ @@P-,jA @@P-,0bA 0P--A@P-A@P-A@P-A@P--,0\.A @@P-,R4A @@P-,YA @@P-,ShaA @@P-,@-vfAP--,6D @@P---p@-b@-@@P--.@-.@-@--,,@ @@P-,@ @@P-,@@ @@P-,@ 0P--A@-A@-A@-A@--,`A @@P-,@ @@P-,A @@P-,0A @@P-,@-8"AP--, @@P--ϡXAP-VAP-XjAP-4_yA@@@P--4@LNl@@@P--&@-Table_A--'TABLE6-3-'TABLE6-1NTable_ATABLE6-1TABLE6-32X700007HairlinedxdF  Z 2CG Times (WN) Regular!e$c&OLE 2.0 Box <=8C HKKKK d(2b$ B!"XNXX"X"XNXX"XN  $   P Pdd@ ( (d!e$c I&mage <=8C HKKKK!e$%A<< CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5'\  `TimesRoman"X( $ Figure  1  nnnn'dxdec&OLE Box<<=8C() WPCwv B P519@0\0+%&1www.*"ӆ0j'+'1 *)1_< c 6Times New Roman RegularcXXX @  5% +%&'1F*Kӆ0j' "n"* f h   1J*!ӆ0x5  DZ|# 1.*#ӆ0j',1n*$ӆ0j'Z Z   ;g  ] N^xnpcxt q\ sZ+'1 *%_+f5cH sI] 0Times New Roman Bold]XXX @  Actual-to-ActualTestc 6Times New Roman RegularcXXXԀ  *& -   c 6Times New Roman RegularcXXX @  25%  *'6#b" c 6Times New Roman RegularcXXX @  20%  *(E!UUa) c 6Times New Roman RegularcXXX @  CleanUnitTest  **1_ӍY< ] 0Times New Roman Bold]XXX @  5%  *+] p 9] 0Times New Roman Bold]XXX @  PollutionControl̀ProjectsExclusion  *, OT] c 6Times New Roman RegularcXXX @  ExtensionofNettingBaseline  *-]|j c 6Times New Roman RegularcXXX @  MajorNSRPermitRequired  */dB dnc 6Times New Roman RegularcXXX @  SourcesAvoidingNSR -+%&'1! 6- **4ӆjcy[   , ( ӆjcy[    -+1, ӆjcy[     , ӆjcy[)    |) -+%&1-+'1 *L>NSvg% c 6Times New Roman RegularcXXX @  45% mV& WPWin 6.0/OLE 1.0 Prefix Information MarkerWPDraw30.Drawing:ࡱ;   Root Entry`.@pFT=Ole 9WPG20CompObj^)F! WPWin61[2]ࡱ `.@pWP Draw 3.0 Drawing Embed SourceWPDraw30.Drawingࡱ; ࡱ; WPCwv B P519@0\0+%&1www.*"ӆ0j'+'1 *)1_< c 6Times New Roman RegularcXXX @  5% +%&'1F*Kӆ0j' "n"* f h   1J*!ӆ0x5  DZ|# 1.*#ӆ0j',1n*$ӆ0j'Z Z   ;g  ] N^xnpcxt q\ sZ+'1 *%_+f5cH sI] 0Times New Roman Bold]XXX @  Actual-to-ActualTestc 6Times New Roman RegularcXXXԀ  *& -   c 6Times New Roman RegularcXXX @  25%  *'6#b" c 6Times New Roman RegularcXXX @  20%  *(E!UUa) c 6Times New Roman RegularcXXX @  CleanUnitTest  **1_ӍY< ] 0Times New Roman Bold]XXX @  5%  *+] p 9] 0Times New Roman Bold]XXX @  PollutionControl̀ProjectsExclusion  *, OT] c 6Times New Roman RegularcXXX @  ExtensionofNettingBaseline  *-]|j c 6Times New Roman RegularcXXX @  MajorNSRPermitRequired  */dB dnc 6Times New Roman RegularcXXX @  SourcesAvoidingNSR -+%&'1! 6- **4ӆjcy[   , ( ӆjcy[    -+1, ӆjcy[     , ӆjcy[)    |) -+%&1-+'1 *L>NSvg% c 6Times New Roman RegularcXXX @  45% mV& BOlePartOlePres000 L4u   uL43f3333f333ff3fffff3f3f̙3f3333f3333333333f3333333f3f33ff3f3f3f3333f3333333f3̙333333f333ff3ffffff3f33f3ff3f3f3ffff3fffffffffff3fffffff3fff̙ffff3fffff???__ߟ߿3f3333f333ff3fffff3f3f̙3f3f3333f333ff3fffff̙̙3̙f̙̙̙3f̙3f3f3333f333ff3fffff3f3f̙3f45   -www-$ug----$ uugfiu----$--Times New Roman-- .  Times New Romanw-Times New Roman-"System-- 2 z5% z---- $ +1$9.B8M?YEgHuI-- --@$ + *00%8%8/A/A9L9L@X@YFgFgIuIuJIGFuCg?]4K-C'=1 - +----$ + +---- $ gUF:0*'&' +-- --F$!hgUTEE99//))&&%%&& * + ,)(),2;GSgh----$he---- $-- --$ ----$---- .$MLKF?5*-- --z$;MNMLLGG@@66++)4=DIJKM----$MM--Times New Roman-- .  Times New Romanw-Times New Roman---!2 %VActual-to-Actual   %-- 2 3Test 3Times New Roman- Times New Roman- Times New Roman - Times New Romanu&- -- 2 3 3Times New Roman- - -     Times New Roman-- .  Times New Romanw-Times New Roman--- 2 R25 % R--Times New Roman-- .  Times New Romanw-Times New Roman--- 2 n20%n.--Times New Roman-- .  Times New Romanw-Times New Roman---2 O Clean Unit  -- 2 cTest |--Times New Roman-- .  Times New Romanw-Times New Roman--- 2 5% --Times New Roman-- .  Times New Romanw-Times New Roman---!2 mPollution Control  m--$2 { Projects Exclusion {--Times New Roman-- .  Times New Romanw-Times New Roman---2 -9 Extension of    ---2 <LNetting  <--2 KHBaseline  K--Times New Roman-- .  Times New Romanw-Times New Roman---2 Major NSR  --2 Permit Required     +--- 2 + 3-Times New Roman-- .  Times New Romanw-Times New Roman---2 SSources S--2 c Avoiding  c-- 2 sNSR  s----$w!w----$yy----$ --Times New Roman-- .  Times New Romanw-Times New Roman--- 2 45% --ࡱ METAFILEPICTL4L4u   uL43f3333f333ff3fffff3f3f̙3f3333f3333333333f3333333f3f33ff3f3f3f3333f3333333f3̙333333f333ff3ffffff3f33f3ff3f3f3ffff3fffffffffff3fffffff3fff̙ffff3fffff???__ߟ߿3f3333f333ff3fffff3f3f̙3f3f3333f333ff3fffff̙̙3̙f̙̙̙3f̙3f3f3333f333ff3fffff3f3f̙3f45   -www-$ug----$ uugfiu----$--Times New Roman-- .  Times New Romanw-Times New Roman-"System-- 2 z5% z---- $ +1$9.B8M?YEgHuI-- --@$ + *00%8%8/A/A9L9L@X@YFgFgIuIuJIGFuCg?]4K-C'=1 - +----$ + +---- $ gUF:0*'&' +-- --F$!hgUTEE99//))&&%%&& * + ,)(),2;GSgh----$he---- $-- --$ ----$---- .$MLKF?5*-- --z$;MNMLLGG@@66++)4=DIJKM----$MM--Times New Roman-- .  Times New Romanw-Times New Roman---!2 %VActual-to-Actual   %-- 2 3Test 3Times New Roman- Times New Roman- Times New Roman - Times New Romanu&- -- 2 3 3Times New Roman- - -     Times New Roman-- .  Times New Romanw-Times New Roman--- 2 R25 % R--Times New Roman-- .  Times New Romanw-Times New Roman--- 2 n20%n.--Times New Roman-- .  Times New Romanw-Times New Roman---2 O Clean Unit  -- 2 cTest |--Times New Roman-- .  Times New Romanw-Times New Roman--- 2 5% --Times New Roman-- .  Times New Romanw-Times New Roman---!2 mPollution Control  m--$2 { Projects Exclusion {--Times New Roman-- .  Times New Romanw-Times New Roman---2 -9 Extension of    ---2 <LNetting  <--2 KHBaseline  K--Times New Roman-- .  Times New Romanw-Times New Roman---2 Major NSR  --2 Permit Required     +--- 2 + 3-Times New Roman-- .  Times New Romanw-Times New Roman---2 SSources S--2 c Avoiding  c-- 2 sNSR  s----$w!w----$yy----$ --Times New Roman-- .  Times New Romanw-Times New Roman--- 2 45% --1e3cM << deUU(@$0  0` (#(#0 ` (#` (# ` <<@PPHP LaserJet 5P/5MP (HP)HPPCL5G,,,,,,0 )Hairline dLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(n$ (  1  ) ;#[e37=CIQYag1.a.i.(1)(a)(i)1)a)kTable_ATABLE6-1TABLE6-2)TABLE6-3"(T$0  0` (#(#0 ` (#` (#0 (# (# (hJ$0  0` (#(#0 ` (#` (#0 (# (#0h(#(#    Table_A(?z$2 e  0  .3  0F Table_ATABLE CPage (WV $   .Courier New Regular!<rl 9Z .Courier New RegularQQ,@QQ (3qT$ B!"XNXX"X"XNXX"XN  $   (3qT$ B!"XNXX"X"XNXX"XN  $   ^^^:Q 9Z .Courier New Regular:Q 9Z .Courier New Regulark 4'D5'6'7'8'D9'U:'D;'D<'L='Dz#Taq'dxdTABLE BTABLE Atx($    Table_D("2$ B!"XNXX"X"XNXX"XN  $   "COX"XN  0  8  'dxd Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5(2b$ B!"XNXX"X"XNXX"XN  $   ($     defcA<< c D ij""XYXX"X"XYXX"XY   H4(xF o 5^$XH*qxy ddd Xdd Xdd XX X q,'dd ,dd ,dd ,dd ,Fdd ,dd +  3m"  5x3  zXXX"XYTABLE32 xx COMPARISONOFTHEANNUALNUMBEROFSOURCESUSEDINPREVIOUSNSRICR'STOESTIMATETHERECORDKEEPINGANDREPORTINGBURDENTOINDUSTRYRESPONDENTSANDSTATEANDLOCALAIRPOLLUTIONCONTROLAGENCIES VnnE-  x0 5 m V 2nn!llnn 2 @ NSRICR(7/85)a ;nn*  "nn ; @ PM10IncrementsICR(4/88)a ;nn*  "nn ; @ NO2 ll IncrementsICR(10/88)a ;nn*  "nn ; @ CMAExhibitAICR(7/89)a ;nn*  "nn ;NSRProgramICR(9/95)a LB*  "   nn xL 0 d (xc0Industry   Respondents  h h             !    "  6, # x  x6MajorPSD  $ sources  % 300 ' &3 '300 ' '3 '300 ' (3 '300 ' )3 '320 ?5 *3 x  x?MajorPart + Dsources    , 100 G=-3  Q@70Q@G70 G=2.3  Q@70 Q@ G70 '/3 '70 '03 '590b ?513 x  @x?Minor tt2 Sourceze XzXc  dd3 20,000 'tt43 '20,000 'tt53 '20,000 'tt63 '20,000 'tt73 '19,500 ?5tt83 x @ x? #zXX zeԡ #Stateand 9 LocalAgencies  ;  '<3 ' '=3 ' '>3 ' '?3 ' ?5@3 x  x?MajorPSD A sources  B 60 'C3 '60 'D3 '60 'E3 '60 'F3 '60 ?5G3 x  x?MajorPart HHH Dsources  88I 50 'HHJ3 '50 'HHK3 '50 'HHL3 '50 'HHM3 '50 Fn5HHN3 x  PxFMinor O Sourcesc 2n!Pn 285 ;n*Q3n ;85 ;n*R3n ;85 ;n*S3n ;85 ;n*T3n ;85:0.U3 x P n :zXzX#zXXz#  aDateoftheICRreflectsstatutoryloweringofmajorsourcecutoff DDV duetothe1990Amendments.cMinorsourcesaresourcesinnonattainmentandattainment/ !!Y unclassifiableareaswhoseactualemissionsandpotentialtoemitarebelowthemajorsourcethresholdsfornonattainmentorPSD,andmodifiedsourcesthatwillavoidthemajorsourceconstructionpermitrequirementsby nettingout𛀜(i.e.,generatinginternalemissionsϜreductionstocounterproposedincreases)ortaking syntheticminorlimits(i.e.,limitingtheirpotentialtoemitbelowthe T'T'_ applicablethresholdsignificancelevels.)@,,",(2b$ B!"XNXX"X"XNXX"XN  $   Table_D&0 d d dTable_BTable_C<Q 9Z .Courier New RegularTable_F<rl 9Z .Courier New Regular(rB$"XXX"X"XXX"X  $  B!"XNXX"X"XNXX"XN  $      XXX"XN  @'DRAFT    INFORMATIONCOLLECTIONREQUESTFOR40CFRPART51AND52PREVENTIONOFSIGNIFICANTDETERIORATIONANDNONATTAINMENTNEWSOURCEREVIEWREGULATORYREFORM8 @     by      DanielCharlesMussatti,Economist D InnovativeStrategiesandEconomicsGroup(MD15)AirQualityStrategiesandStandardsDivision@@88)andDennisCrumpler,EnvironmentalEngineerIntegratedImplementationGroup(MD12)InformationTransferandProgramIntegrationDivisionOfficeofAirQualityPlanningandStandardsOfficeofAirandRadiationUnitedStatesEnvironmentalProtectionAgency  P(#*  ResearchTrianglePark,NorthCarolina27711 $)t$+ April25,1996  H-(0   .l)1 B7AAXXdXXd7@(DRAFT  @ INFORMATIONCOLLECTIONREQUEST@FOR40CFRPART51AND52@ PREVENTIONOFSIGNIFICANTDETERIORATIONAND  NONATTAINMENTNEWSOURCEREVIEWREGULATORYREFORM8      @" `X XTABLEOFCONTENTS# XX `M#Ԉ     Vm  Vm0     1.0(#(#IDENTIFICATIONOFTHEINFORMATIONCOLLECTION#""J(#.;(#(##1Vm݌   Ќ   !   !0  0` (#(#     !݌ ` (#` (# Ќ   !   !c0  0` (#(#    (a)0` ` (#` (#TitleoftheInformationCollectionRequest(ICR)#""J(#.X X E` (#` (##1 !c~݌ ~  Ќ   !   !n 0  0` (#(#    (b) ` ShortCharacterization#""J(#.((+` (#` (##1 !n ݌ b  Ќ  Vm  VmW 0     2.  NEEDFORANDUSEOFTHECOLLECTION#""J(#.1(#(##2VmW s ݌ *z Ќ   !   !7 0  0` (#(#     !7 R ݌ ` (#` (# Ќ   !   ! 0  0` (#(#    (a)0` ` (#` (#Need/AuthorityfortheCollection#""J(#.5` (#` (##2 ! ݌ B Ќ   !   ! 0  0` (#(#    (b) ` Use/UsersoftheData#8"8"I(#.*` (#` (##3 ! ݌ & Ќ  Vm  Vm 0     3.  THERESPONDENTSANDTHEINFORMATIONREQUESTED#8"8"I(#.  <(#(##4Vm ݌  Ќ   !   !0  0` (#(#     !݌ ` (#` (# Ќ   !   !G0  0` (#(#    (a)Respondents/StandardIndustrialClassification(SIC)#""J(#.H!H!G` (#` (##5 !Gb݌ f Ќ  +  +B0  0` (#(#0 ` (#` (# `   +B]݌  (# (# Ќ     ` (1)EstimationoftheNumberofSourcesSubjectto   `  PartDandPSDRegulations""J(#.35 b +  +0  0` (#(#0 ` (#` (# `   (2)MajorStationaryNSRSources#""J(#.PP6 (# (##8+݌ F Ќ  6  60  0` (#(#0 ` (#` (#0 (# (#   6݌ (#(# Ќ  6  6t0  0` (#(#0 ` (#` (#0 (# (#   (i)0(#(#SummaryofNSRReformDraftRegulations  AffectingtheNumberofMajorSources#""J(#.hhC(#(##86t݌  Ќ  8J  8J0  0` (#(#0 ` (#` (#0 (# (#0h(#(#    8J݌ h(#h(# Ќ     `  (ii)0  MethodforEstimatingtheNumberofMajor j!  StationarySourcesAffectedbyNSRReform#""J(#.H!H!G(#(##8 N"! +  +0  0` (#(#0 ` (#` (# `   +݌  (# (# Ќ     ` (3)MinorStationarySources8"8"I(#.113 $f#  !   !0  0` (#(#     !݌ ` (#` (# Ќ   !   !D0  0` (#(#    (b)InformationRequested#!!H(#.(` (#` (##13 !D_݌ %.!% Ќ  +  +"0  0` (#(#0 ` (#` (# `   +"=݌  (# (# Ќ     ` (1)DataItems8"8"I(#."13 '"' +  +/0  0` (#(#0 ` (#` (# `   (2)RespondentActivities#!!H(#.. (# (##14+/J݌ (#( Ќ  Vm  Vm"0     4.0(#(#THEINFORMATIONCOLLECTEDAGENCYACTIVITIES,COLLECTION R*%* METHODOLOGY,ANDINFORMATIONMANAGEMENT#8"8"I(#.PP6(#(##14Vm">݌ 6+&+ Ќ   !   !_0  0` (#(#     !_z݌ ` (#` (# Ќ   !   !0  0` (#(#    (a)StateandLocalAgencyActivities#!!H(#.``4` (#` (##14 !݌ ,N(- Ќ   !   !0  0` (#(#    (b)CollectionMethodologyandManagement#!!H(#.@@8` (#` (##14 !݌  Ќ  Vm  Vm0     5.0(#(#REGULATORYFLEXIBILITY,ENVIRONMENTALEQUITY,ANDOTHER x COLLECTIONCRITERIA#8"8"I(#."(#(##15Vm݌ \ Ќ   !   !0  0` (#(#     ! ݌ ` (#` (# Ќ   !   ! 0  0` (#(#    (a)SmallEntityFlexibility#8"8"I(#.((+` (#` (##15 ! ݌ $ t Ќ  +  +}!0  0` (#(#0 ` (#` (# `   +}!!݌  (# (# Ќ     ` (1)Methodology8"8"I(#.hh#16  < +  +"0  0` (#(#0 ` (#` (# `   (2)Results#8"8"I(#. (# (##17+""݌   Ќ  +  +n#0  0` (#(#0 ` (#` (# `   (3)MeasurestoAvertImpactsonSmallEntities#8"8"I(#.hhC (# (##18+n##݌    Ќ  +  +u$0  0` (#(#0 ` (#` (# `   (4)MeasurestoMitigateImpactsonSmallEntities#8"8"I(#. F (# (##19+u$$݌    Ќ   !   !%0  0` (#(#     !%%݌ ` (#` (# Ќ   !   !&0  0` (#(#    (b)CollectionSchedule#8"8"I(#.&` (#` (##19 !&:&݌ `  Ќ   !   !&0  0` (#(#    (c)EnvironmentalJusticeConsiderations#!!H(#.7` (#` (##19 !&'݌ D  Ќ  +  +'0  0` (#(#0 ` (#` (# `   +'(݌  (# (# Ќ     ` (1)PurposeofAnalysis8"8"I(#.,19  \  +  +(0  0` (#(#0 ` (#` (# `   (2)ImpactofNSRReform#!!H(#., (# (##20+()݌ @ Ќ  +  +)0  0` (#(#0 ` (#` (# `   (3)MitigationMeasures#!!H(#.((+ (# (##20+) *݌ $ Ќ   !   !*0  0` (#(#     !**݌ ` (#` (# Ќ   !   !+0  0` (#(#    (d)Nonduplication#!!H(#.xx!` (#` (##21 !++݌  Ќ   !   !V,0  0` (#(#    (e)Consultations#!!H(#.xx!` (#` (##21 !V,q,݌  Ќ   !   !--0  0` (#(#    (f)EffectsofLessFrequentCollection#!!H(#.PP6` (#` (##22 !--H-݌ d Ќ   !   !.0  0` (#(#    (g)GeneralGuidelines#!!H(#.XX%` (#` (##22 !.4.݌ H Ќ   !   !.0  0` (#(#    (h)ConfidentialityandSensitiveQuestions#!!H(#.00:` (#` (##22 !./݌ ,| Ќ  +  +/0  0` (#(#0 ` (#` (# `   +//݌  (# (# Ќ     ` (1)Confidentiality8"8"I(#.HH'22 D +  +00  0` (#(#0 ` (#` (# `   (2)SensitiveQuestions#8"8"I(#.((+ (# (##22+01݌ ( Ќ  Vm  Vm10     6.0(#(#ESTIMATINGTHEBURDENANDCOSTOFTHECOLLECTION#8"8"I(#.?(#(##22Vm12݌  Ќ   !   !20  0` (#(#     !22݌ ` (#` (# Ќ   !   !|30  0` (#(#    (a)EstimatingRespondentBurdenandCosts#8"8"I(#.9` (#` (##23 !|33݌ h Ќ  +  +j40  0` (#(#0 ` (#` (# `   +j44݌  (# (# Ќ     ` (i)CapitalandStartupCost8"8"I(#.123 0!  8J  8J50  0` (#(#0 ` (#` (#0 (# (#0h(#(#    8J55݌ h(#h(# Ќ     ` (ii)CostofOperation,Maintenanceand   `    PurchaseofServices!!H(#.pp225 #,#  !   !70  0` (#(#     !757݌ ` (#` (# Ќ   !   !70  0` (#(#    (b)EstimatingtheStateandLocalAgency !77݌ ` (#` (# Ќ   !   !80  0` (#(#     ` BurdenandCost#8"8"I(#.hh#` (#` (##27 !88݌ &!& Ќ   !   !d90  0` (#(#    (c)EstimatingAgencyBurdenandCost#8"8"I(#.5` (#` (##27 !d99݌ l'"' Ќ   !   !N:0  0` (#(#    (d)ReasonsforChangeinBurden#8"8"I(#.0` (#` (##31 !N:i:݌ P(#( Ќ   !   !3;0  0` (#(#    (e)BottomLineBurdenHoursandCosts/ !3;N;݌ ` (#` (# Ќ   !   !;0  0` (#(#     ` BurdenTables#8"8"I(#.xx!` (#` (##31 !;<݌ *h%* Ќ   !   !<0  0` (#(#    (f)BurdenStatement#8"8"I(#.$` (#` (##32 !<<݌ *L&+ Ќ    -). Ї@*@**' `X X TABLES   XX `310  PRIMARYNSRRESPONDENTSBYSICCODES...........5,(#(# 320  COMPARISONOFTHEANNUALNUMBEROFSOURCESUSEDIN (#(#   PREVIOUSNSRICSSTOESTIMATETHERECORDKEEPING  ANDREPORTINGBURDENTOINDUSTRYRESPONDENTSAND  STATEANDLOCALAIRPOLLUTIONCONTROLAGENCIES......7330  MAJORMODIFICATIONSABLETOAVOIDNSRDUETOh (#(#   THENSRREFORMPROPOSALS.................1251  INDUSTRYMULTIPLIES...................17   61  RESPONDENTBURDENANDCOSTS................26   620  STATEANDLOCALAGENCYBURDENANDCOSTS.........29T(#(# 630  FEDERALBURDENANDCOSTS................30l(#(# 640  SUMMARYOFRECORDKEEPINGANDREPORTINGBURDENESTIMATES4(#(#   TOINDUSTRYRESPONDENTSANDSTATEANDLOCALAGENCIES..33@HH'FIGURES31  DISTRIBUTIONOFPOTENTIALNSRPERMITTINGRESPONDENTS  p   UNDERPROPOSEDNSRREFORMCHANGES............13@*@%APPENDIXA@LLINFORMATIONREQUIREMENTSA10  RESPONDENTDATAANDINFORMATIONREQUIREMENTSFORPREPARING@% $(#(#   PARTC(PSD)CONSTRUCTIONPERMITS............36A20  STATEDATAANDINFORMATIONREQUIREMENTSFORPSD'<#'(#(#   PERMITS........................37A30  RESPONDENTDATAANDINFORMATIONREQUIREMENTSFORPREPARING *%* PARTD(NONATTAINMENTNSR)CONSTRUCTIONPERMITS.....38 (#(# A40  STATEDATAANDINFORMATIONREQUIREMENTSFORNONATTAINMENTD-(-(#(#   REGULATIONS......................39   ?B7AAXXdAXXd7  1.0  IDENTIFICATIONOFTHEINFORMATIONCOLLECTION NG(#(#    (a)0 ` TitleoftheInformationCollectionRequest(ICR) G` (#` (#   ThisreportisentitledInformationCollectionRequestfor d 40CFRparts51and52PreventionofSignificantDeteriorationandNonattainmentNewSourceReviewRegulatoryReform8 x .D x x     (b) ` ShortCharacterization eI $ t   TheUnitedStatesEnvironmentalProtectionAgency(EPA)isproposingtoreviseregulationspertainingtonationalPreventionofSignificantDeterioration(PSD)ofAirQualityandNonattainmentNewSourceReview(NSR)programs.Theregulationsbeingrevisedarecontainedinparts51and52oftitle40oftheCodeofFederalRegulations(CFR)whichcollectivelyspecify  requirementsforthepreparation,adoption,submittal,approvalandpromulgationofimplementationplans.Specifically,40CFR51.166specifiesrequirementsforStateadoptedPSDprograms;40CFR52.21setsoutFederalPSDprogramrequirementsthatmayberunbyStatesiftheychoosetoacceptdelegationofEPAsauthority.TheStateadoptednonattainmentNSRprogramsaregovernedbyregulationsat40CFR51.165;40CFR52.24pertainstoaconstructionmoratoriuminanynonattainmentareathatdoesnothaveanEPAapprovedNSRprogram.  TheproposedrevisionsarebasedonrecommendationsfromtheNSRReformSubcommitteeoftheCleanAirActAdvisoryCommittee(CAAAC)whichwasconvenedtoengageinterestedstakeholdersinanefforttoreducetheburdenofNSRpermitting,butretaintheenvironmentalprotectionattributesofthecurrentNSRprogram.TheproposedrevisionstomajorNSRapplicabilitycriteriawouldexcludeanestimated50percentofsourcesthatmightotherwisebesubjecttomajorNSR.ThesesourceswouldthenbecoveredbyminorNSRprogramsimplementedattheStateandlocallevels.Figure31(below)displaystherelativeimpactofeachoftheproposedrevisionstomajorNSRapplicability.CostsavingswouldberealizedduetolesseffortneededforpreparationofminorsourcepermitapplicationsandshorterprocessingtimeofminorversusmajorNSRpermitandtotheextentthattheminorNSRtechnologycontrolrequirementsandmitigationmeasuresarelesscostlythanthemajorsourcerequirementsandmeasures.Also,theproposedstreamliningofsomeofthetimeintensive ,b'* aspectsofthemajorsourcerequirementswouldhaveasimilareffectindecreasingthecostsofdevelopingpermitapplications,thusreducingthecostsofdelayanduncertaintyinplanningforfuturesourcegrowth.PermittingAuthorities(PAs)andtheEPAwillalsorealizeadecreaseinpermitprocessingcosts.Deleteriousenvironmentalconsequencesoftheproposedrevisionsshouldbeinsignificant.  ThisICRaddressestherecordkeepingandreportingburdentoindustryrespondentsandStateandlocalairpollutioncontrolagenciessubjecttotherequirementsunder40CFRparts51and52astheywouldbeaffectedbytheproposedrulemaking.Burdenmeansthetotaltime,effortorfinancialresourcesexpendedbypersonstogenerate,maintain,retain,ordiscloseorprovideinformationtoorforaFederalagency.Thisincludesthetimeneededtoreviewinstructions;develop,acquire,install,andutilizetechnologyandsystemsforthepurposesofcollecting,validating,verifying,processing,maintaining,disclosing,andprovidinginformation;adjusttheexistingwaystocomplywithanypreviouslyapplicableinstructionsandrequirements;trainpersonneltobeabletorespondtoacollectionofinformation;searchdatasources;completeandreviewthecollectionofinformation;andtransmitorotherwisedisclosetheinformation.ThetypesofinformationcollectionactivitiesaddressedinthisICRarethoseassociatedwithpreparingpermitapplicationswithdocumentationtosupporttheconlusionthataprojectmeetsallapplicablestatutoryandregulatorypermittingrequirements.Theburdenformonitoring,recordkeepingandreportingtoverifythatasourcehasconstructedandoperateswithinthepermitconditionshasbeenaddressedinICRsfortwootherprogramrulemakingeffortsThecomplianceassurancemonitoring(CAM)ruleandtheoperatingpermitsprogramsdevelopedundertitleV.ThisICRalsopresentsestimatedimpactsontheburdentoEPA.̀  Theburdenestimatesarecalculatedforthe3yearperiodbeginningJuly1998andendingJuly2001.ThisperiodwaschosenbasedonaproposalinApril1996,promulgationinJuly1997andincoporationintoStateimplementationplans(SIP's)ordelegationagreementsbyJuly1998.  2.  NEEDFORANDUSEOFTHECOLLECTION Z $*t%(     (a)0 ` Need/AuthorityfortheCollection A[+H'*` (#` (# Ї  Section110oftheCleanAirAct(theAct)requiresallStatestoadoptintotheirSIPspreconstructionreviewprogramsfornewormodifiedstationarysources.TheprogramsmustincludeprovisionsthatmeetthespecificrequirementsofpartC"PreventionofSignificantDeterioration(PSD)"andpartD"PlanRequirementsforNonattainmentAreas"oftitleIoftheActforpermittingconstructionandmodificationofmajorstationarysources.ImplementingregulationsforStateadoptionoftheNSRprogramsintotheirSIPsarepromulgatedat40CFR51.160-166andpart51,appendixS.Federalpermittingregulationsarepromulgatedat40CFR52.21forPSDareasthatarenotcoveredbyanEPAapprovedprogramintheSIP.Beforetheowneroroperatorofafacilitycanbeginconstructionormodificationofitssource,itmustcomplywithallapplicablepermitrequirements,which,inturn,ensuresthattherequirementsoftheActaremet.  PartCoftitleIoftheActsetsoutspecificpreconstructionreviewandpermittingrequirementsfornewandmodifiedsourcesconstructinginareaswhoseambientairqualitycomplieswiththeNationalAmbientAirQualityStandards(NAAQS).ThePSDrulesgenerallyrequireaprospectivemajornewormodifiedsourceto:(1)demonstratethattheNAAQSandincrementswillnotbeviolatedasaresultofemissionsincreasesfromtheproposedproject,(2)ensuretheselectionandinstallationofbestavailablecontroltechnology(BACT),(3)protectClassIareasfromadverseimpacts,and(4)considerlocalenvironmentalconcernsabouttheconstructionofanew,ormodificationofanexisting,majorstationarysource.  PartDoftitleIoftheActspecifiesrequirementsformajornewandmodifiedsourcesconstructinginareasdesignatedasnonattainmentforaNAAQSpursuanttosection107oftheAct.ThepartDprovisionsalsoapplytomajorsourcepermittingintheNortheastOzoneTransportRegionasestablishedundersection184oftheAct.ThepartDrulesgenerallyrequireamajornewormodifiedsourceto:(1)ensuretheapplicationofcontrolswhichwillachievethelowestachievableemissionrateLAER),(2)certifythatallmajorsourcesinaStateownedorcontrolledbythesameperson(orpersons)areincompliancewithallairemissionsregulations,(3)securereductionsinactualemissionsfromexistingsourcesequaltoorgreaterthantheprojectedincreasetoshowattainmentandmaintenanceoftheapplicableNAAQS(offsets)and(4)preparingananalysisof ,`'* alternativesites,sizes,productionprocessesandcontrolstrategiestoshowthatthebenefitsoftheproposedprojectoutweightheenvironmentalandsocialcoststhatitwouldotherwiseimpose.Apublicreviewandcommentperiodarerequiredforallmajorsourcepermitactionsandsomenonmajorsourceactions.  `        (b) ` Use/UsersoftheData Sg @    TheinformationpreparedandsubmittedbytheapplicantsourceisessentialforproperadministrationandmanagementoftheNSRprogram.TheapplicantmustdeveloporcollectallrelevantinformationnototherwiseavailabletothePA,andincaseswhereaFederalClassIareaislikelytobeadverselyimpacted,relevantinformationfortheFederalLandManagerofthatarea.Thiswouldincludeconductingthenecessaryresearch,performingtheappropriateanalyses,andpreparingpermitapplicationswithdocumentationtosupporttheconclusionthattheproposedprojectmeetsallapplicablestatutoryandregulatoryrequirements(summarizedaboveanddetailedinappendixA.)Whilesomeoftherequiredanalysesmaybeperformedbythepermittingauthorityinagivensituation,thisICRassumesthatallanalyseswillbeperformedbythesourceandthusrepresentsa worstcaseburdenestimate.  ThePAreviewstheapplicationmaterialssubmittedbytheapplicantandeitherdeclaresthepermitapplicationcompleteforprocessingorprovidestheapplicantguidanceonhowtocorrectthedeficienciesintheapplication.TheapplicantthencollectstheadditionaldataidentifiedbythePAinorderforthepermitapplicationtobedeemed complete.Althoughsufficientinformationmustbesubmittedbytheapplicantbeforeitspermitcanbedeterminedtobecomplete,someadditionalinformationcanbesubmittedatalaterdatebytheapplicanttoassistthePAinprocessingthepermitapplication.̀  OnceanapplicationisdeemedcompletethePAreviewsittoaffirmtheproposedsourceormodificationwillcomplywiththeActandapplicableregulations.Itmakesapreliminarydeterminationregardingtheapprovabilityofthepermitapplicationandmakesthedetermination,togetherwiththeapplicationandsupportinginformation,availabletothepublic30days,thedetermination,togetherwiththeapplicationand ,`'* supportinginformation.ThePAmustthenrespondtopubliccommentsandtakeactiononthefinalpermit.Finally,thePAverifiesthatasourcehasconstructedandsubsequentlyoperatesincompliancewiththepermitconditions.TheEPAreviewsafractionofthetotalapplicationsandauditstheStateandlocalprogramsfortheireffectiveness.Someofthedataareusedtotrackemissionstrendsfrommajorsourcegrowthandtheuseofcontroltechnologiesforvariouskindsindustrialapplications.  Insummary,sourcesderivethenecessaryinformationtodemonstratethataproposedprojectwillmeetallstatutoryandregulatoryrequirementsandthusarequalifiedforaconstructionpermit.Permittingauthoritiesusetheinformationtomakeinformeddecisionsinissuingconstructionpermitstostationarysources.TheinformationalsoisusedsubsequentlybypermittingagenciestoissueoperatingpermitsundertitleVoftheAct.Thepublicusestheinformationtoprovideinputonpermittingdecisionsthattheyhavereasontobelievewillimpacttheirlocalcommunitiesandareasofpublicinterest.  3.  THERESPONDENTSANDTHEINFORMATIONREQUESTED s 8    (a)Respondents/StandardIndustrialClassification(SIC) vt  Codes  Table31liststhethreedigitSICgroupstheAgencyexpectswillcomprisethemajorityofrespondentswhowillbeaffectedbythisrulemaking.ThesecategorieswerechosenbecauseoftheirhistoricrelativeincidenceinseekingNSRpermits,asestablishedinpriorICR'sandconfirmedbyanationwideairinventoryperformedbytheAgencyin198687.Theseindustrieshavebeenusedasthebasisforimpactanalysissincethatinventory.   TABLE31v   PRIMARYNSRRESPONDENTSBYSICCODE  ,(|#& v  v   `  IndustrialCategory   p   SICCode )D%(    `  SteamElectricPlants p   491 +$'*    `   ,(+    `  PetroleumRuling   p   291     `  ChemicalProcesses   p   281     `  NaturalGasTransport p   492 p    `  PulpandPaper     p   261and262 P     `  AutomobileManufacturing p   371 0     `  Pharmaceuticals   p   283 `     (1)EstimationoftheNumberofSourcesSubjecttoPartDandPSDRegulations >{  FourICR'shavebeenpreparedforpreviousNSRrulemakings:1)theoriginalNSRICRwaspreparedJuly1985;(2)anupdateforPM10wascompletedApril1988;(3)anotherupdatefornitrogendioxide(NO2)incrementswascompletedOctober1988and;  (4)anICRfortheCMAexhibitArulerevisionwaswrittenJuly1989.TheNSRprogramICRwasupdatedafifthtimeinSeptember1995.Inthatrevision,datafromthepriorfourICR's,whichwasbelievedtorepresentareasonableconsiderationofthehistoricburdenfromtheNSRprogram,wasadjustedtoreflectstatutorychangesintheNSRprogramresultingfromthe1990Amendments(1990Amendments)totheCleanAirAct.AsillustratedbyTable32andreflectedintheSeptember1995ICR,asignificantlyhighernumberofsourcesaresubjecttoNSRbecauseStateshaverevisedtheirSIP'stoincorporatethelowerapplicabilitythresholdsfornewandmodifiedsourcesinozonenonattainmentareasthatwereimposedbythe1990Amendments.TheSeptember1995ICRservesasthebaselinefortheICRdescribedherein.Thus,thebaselinetotalfortheannualnumberofmajorNSRpermitsperyearisestimatedat590forpartDpermitsand320forPSDpermits.  $"  TRY3' Letter3'3' Letter3'TghJ:6zx x p @@@EX D(X D(!%) %%     (2)MAJORSTATIONARYNSRSOURCES ނ      (i)0 ` SummaryofNSRReformDraftRegulationsAffectingthe  NumberofMajorSources I ` (#` (#   PollutionControlandPollutionPreventionProject T  Exclusion:Asimpleexclusionforexistingsourcesthateither D  installcontroltechnologyforthepurposeofreducingpollutionemissions,orthatengageinprojectsthatpreventemissionsandthataredeterminedbythepermittingauthoritytobeenvironmentallybeneficial.  CleanUnitTest:Modifyingsourcesthathaveinstalled 4  controltechnologythatisessentiallyequivalenttoBACTorLAERwouldcomparechangesinmaximumhourlypotentialemissionstodetermineapplicability.  CleanFacilityExclusion:Forsourcesthatgothrougha  fullmajorsourcereview,a10yearperiodinwhichthefacilitymaymodifythefacilityorchangeoperatingconditionswithoutbeingsubjecttomajorNSR,solongasthepermitrequirementsaremaintained.  PlantwideApplicabilityLimits:Anemissionscapfora 4 facilitywhichisderivedfromhistoricalactualemissionsandasmall(lessthansignificant)marginforgrowthandwhichallowsthefacilitytomakesubsequentmodificationsandoperationalchangesatthefacilitysolongasthecapisnotexceeded.  ExtensionoftheNettingBaseline:Theperiodfor $ establishingthehistoricalactualannualemissionsbaselinefromwhichproposedemissionsincreasesaremeasuredwillbebasedonaperiodof12consecutivemonthsoutoftheprevious120,comparedtotheperiodoftheprevious2yearsofoperationundertheexistingregulations  ActualtoFutureActualEmissionsTest:Anapplicability d&!$ testthatallowsasourcetodeterminethenetemissionsincreaseofaproposedmodificationbycomparingprojectedactualemissionstotheactualemissionsbaseline.Existingrulescallfortheemissionsincreasetobecalculatedasthedifferencebetweenasource'snewmaximumpotentialemissionsanditshistoricalactualemissions. ,T'* Ї   (ii)0 ` MethodforEstimatingtheNumberofMajorStationary  SourcesAffectedbyNSRReform < ` (#` (#   Theapproachinvolvedtwosteps:asensitivityanalysisofthoseSICgroupswhichtendtohavethegreatestnumberofNSRpermitseachyear,andconductingtelephoneinterviewstoqualifytheaccuracyoftheseestimates.InterviewswereconductedwithStateandEPARegionalOfficepersonnelwhowereidentifiedashavingbroadNSRpermittingexperience,industryexperts,andotheraffectedparties.Theseestimateswereusedtodevelopanoverallestimateofthenumberofaffectedsources.  Whilethetelephonesurveysshowedthatevenamongexpertswithsimilarexpertiseandexperience,estimatesoftheeffectsoftheproposedchangesvariedwidely,theneteffectoftheproposedrevisionstotheNSRregulationswillbetoreducethenumberofsourcessubjecttoNSRpermitting,ascomparedtothe1995baseline.ThisreductionwilloccurinbothnonattainmentandPSDareas.Becausedataarenotavailableforestimatingthenumberofsourcesbypollutant,thenumberofsourcessubjecttomajorNSRprovisionswasestimatedcollectivelyforallofthecriteriapollutants.ThisisconsistentwiththemethodologyusedfortheSeptember1995ICRandpreviousupdates.̀  TheEPAestimatesthatatleast80percentofthesourcesinthe1995baselinearemajormodificationstoexistingmajorsources.OutoftheproposedNSRReformsdescribedabove,fourwouldcreatedirectexclusionsorrevisedapplicabilitycriteriathatwouldreducethenumberofsourceswhichmustundergomajorNSRasaresultofmodificationunderthecurrentregulations.Theestimatedeffectofeachisdiscussedbelow.TheactualfrequencythatagivenproposedrevisionwouldbeusedisextremelydifficulttoquantifygiventhelimiteddataonthenumberandtypesofsourcesthathavebeenissuedmajorNSRpermitsinthepast.NumerousassumptionswerethereforenecessaryinderivingtheestimatedimpactsoftheproposedNSRReformrevisions.Itisbelieved,however,thattheassumptionserrconservatively,sotheanalysisisstillquiteusefulforestimatingaconservativeburdenreductionoftheproposedNSRReformrule.  PollutionControlProjectExemption.TheAgencyexpectsthe  +p&) decreaseinmajorNSRpermitsduetotheproposedexemptionfor ,`'* pollutioncontrolprojectsandqualifyingpollutionpreventionprojectstobeabout5percentof1995baseline.Thisestimatedamountissmallbecauseitisbelievedmostprojectsofthisnaturewouldnotbeamajormodificationunderthecurrentregulations.Consequently,theestimatedreductioninthenumberofmajorpartDpermitsis30peryear,andthenumberofmajorPSDpermitswouldfallby16peryear.  NewApplicabilityTestfor CleanUnits.Thistestwould 0  applytotwotypesofmodificationstoexistingemissionsunits.First,itisassumedthatmajormodificationstoexistingunitsconstituteabout20percentofallmodificationsthatwouldotherwisebesubjecttoNSR(16percentofthe1995baseline).About50percentofthesemodificationsareassumedtohaveinstalledBACTorLAERwithinthelast10yearsandanother10percentwouldqualifyaswellcontrolledunits.Thereforethetestwouldapplytoapproximately10percentofthe1995baseline.Nowitisassumedthat50percentofthesesourceswouldexhibitnoincreaseinpotentialhourlyemissionsandthusavoidmajorNSR.Multiplyingthe1995baselinebytheresulting5percent,30partDand16PSDsourcesperyearwouldbeabletoavoidmajorNSRasaresultofthisproposedapplicabilitytest. W  1       `   ChangeinNettingBaseline.Estimatesforthepercentageof @ modificationscurrentlysubjecttomajorNSRthatwouldbeabletonetoutundertheproposedsystemrangedfrom25to90percent.Usingthe1995baselineandthemostconservativereduction(25percentofestimatedmodificationsor20percentofthe1995baseline)thisanalysisprojects118majorpartDsourcesormodificationsand64majorPSDsourcesperyearwouldnetoutduetothechangeinthenettingbaseline.  ActualtoFutureActualtest.TheAgencyexpectsthatthe "  impactofthisapplicabilitytestbyitselfwouldbesimilartoextendingtheperiodfordeterminingthenettingbaseline;however,whencombined,thetwoshouldcreateasynergisticeffect.Therefore,theimpactforthistestwasconservativelyestimatedata30percentreductionofallmodificationsthatwouldotherwisebecoveredbymajorNSR(or25percentofthe P(#& 1995baseline).ConsequentlythecommensuratereductioninmajorpartDNSRpermitswouldbe147,andthenumberofPSDpermitswoulddropby80.  CleanFacilityExclusionandPAL's.Theburdenreductions p associatedwithofferingthe"CleanFacilityExclusion"and"PlantwideApplicabilityLimits"(PAL's)weredifficulttoquantifyand,therefore,werenotincludedintheburdencalculations.Neitherrepresentsanabsoluteexclusion.The CleanFacilityExclusion"ispredicatedonasourcesacquisitionofamajorNSRpermit.ThePAL'sofferpotentialeliminationofsubsequentofapplicabilitydeterminationsandreview;however,thenumberiscasespecific.BecausePAL'srepresentapropospectivelookatfuturemodificationsandoperationalchangesatthefacility,theymaybeverydetailedandcomplextocraft.Finally,itisdifficulttopredictwhatfutureactivitiesmightbesubjecttoNSRapartfromtheseexclusions,sinceotherproposedrevisionsmaybeapplicableandaffordthesamerelief.Consequently,forthepurposesofthisanalysistheCleanFacilityTestandPAL'sareassumedtohavelittleimpactonreportingandrecordkeepingburden.OmittingtheimpactsofthesetwoprovisionsbiastheestimatedICRburdenreductionconservatively.̀  CombinedEffectofChanges.Thedecreasesinthenumberof 0 sourcessubjecttomajorNSRarenotadditive.Forexample,amodifiedunitmightnolongerbesubjecttoNSRbecauseofthecleanunittestortherevisioninthenettingbaseline.However,giventhenumerousassumptionsthatwerenecessary,theeffectofthisdoublecountingwasalsoconsideredtobenegligible.TheestimatedimpactofalltheproposedreformsonNSRapplicabilitywouldbeareductionof324partDsourcesand176PSDsources,whichotherwisewouldhavebeensubjecttomajorNSR.TheSeptember1995ICRbaselinewouldbereducedto266partDand144PSDmajorsourcesperyear.Table33belowdisplaysthechangesinreportingrequirementsintabular form. % #  Figure3.1illustrateshowtheproposedrevisionswouldaffect &!$ thedistributionofsourcesthatwouldotherwisebesubjecttoNSRunderthecurrentsystem.  `(#& @& TABLE33  @@ @ MAJORMODIFICATIONSABLETOAVOIDNSR X @l l DUETOTHENSRREFORMPROPOSALS*  <  X*wQnRddd Xdd Xdd X%%w, (,X,,,e,(+  6,  ` 861995BaselineforReportingSources H   0 G=,8  3   GPSD 3)H  3 3PartDNSR 3)8  3 3Total I?#H  3 8 ,I H> ( x  t@320t@H320 uk9T 3 t@320 t@ p@590p@u590 rh9T 3 p@590 p@  @@p@r910 cYAT 3  @@ , p@ ,c 1'p  1PercentReductionofBaseline :0@ 3 :UnitsAbletoAvoidNSR QG&p " ,  ,QProposedChangetoApplicability @6%L @PSD 3)\ 3 3PartD 3)L3 3PSD 3)\ 3 3PartD 3)\ 3 3TOTAL KA#\ 3 , ,KNewTestfor"CleanUnits" UKX  ?0.05?U5% wm:h!3 ?0.05 ? ?0.05?w5% tj:h"3 ?0.05 ?  @@0t-16 qg7h#3  @@ 0  @@=q-30 pf7h$3  @@ =  @@Fp-46 i_Ah%3  @@ , F ,iChangeinNettingBaseline TJd' ?0.2?T20% uk9t(3 ?0.2 ? ?0.2?u20% si9t)3 ?0.2 ?  @@Ps-64 qg7t*3  @@ P  @@]q-118 pf7t+3  @@ ]  @@fp-182 i_At,3  @@ , f ,iUseofActual-To-ActualTest UKp. ?0.25?U25% wm:/3 ?0.25 ? ?0.25?w25% tj:03 ?0.25 ?  @@Tt-80 qg713  @@ T  @@pbq-148 pf723  @@ pb  @@plp-228 i_A33  @@ , pl ,iPollutionControlProjectExemption UK|5 ?0.05?U5% wm:63 ?0.05 ? ?0.05?w5% tj:73 ?0.05 ?  @@0t-16 qg783  @@ 0  @@=q-30 pf793  @@ =  @@Fp-46 i_A:3  @@ , F ,iTotalReductionin1995Baseline QG<  0?Q55% oe6=3  0 ?  0?o55% oe6>3  0 ?  0fo-176 oe6?3  0 f  0Hto-325 oe6@3  0 Ht  0Ho-501 pfAA3  0 , H ,pNumberofSourcesRequiredtoReport =3(C = KAD  @@b@K144 oe6E3  @@ b@  @@p@o266 oe6F3  @@ p@  @@y@o410QGEG3  @@ , y@ Q  t!H @( FIGURE31  @DISTRIBUTIONOFPOTENTIALNSRPERMITTINGRESPONDENTS@\ \ UNDERPROPOSEDNSRREFORMCHANGES  \  mm%% mmmm mmmmm'9)%`|0  ` EP   m k m mmmm mmmm mmmm mmmm mmmm mmmm mmmm mmmm mmmm mmmm mmmm mmmm mmmm mmmm %%mm   (3)MinorStationarySources RX  TheSeptember1995ICRestimated19,500minorsourcepermitsperyear.Forthepurposesofthisanalysis,theterm minorsourcemeanseither(1)anynewsourcethatiseitherbelowthemajornewsourceemissionsthresholds,or(2)anymodifiedexistingmajorstationarysourcewhoseassociatednetemissionsincreaseisbelowthemajormodificationthresholdcalleda significantemissionsincrease,foreithernonattainmentorattainment/unclassifiableareas.AlthoughthesesourceswouldnothavetoundergomajorNSR,theywouldlikelybesubjecttotherelevantStateminorNSRpermittingprovisions.̀  Thenumberofminorsourcesnationwidewillincreaseasaresultofthedecreaseinmajorsources.TheestimatedtotaldecreaseinmajorsourcesasaresultoftheproposedNSRreformswasaddedtothe19,500minorsourcesrespondentstoyieldaestimatedtotalof20,000minorsourcerespondents.   (b)InformationRequested _ , (+    (1)DataItems   TablesA-1andA-2ofappendixAsummarizethedataandinformationrequirementswhichownersoroperatorsofmajorsourceswouldhavetoincludeinPSDandnonattainmentNSRconstructionpermitapplicationsundertheproposedNSRReformrevisions.AlsoshownaretheCFRreferencesforthedataand P  informationrequirementsasspecifiedintheproposedNSRReformregulation.TheCFRreferencepertainstotherequirementsunder >  part51whichgovernthewayStatesimplementNSRprograms.Foreachreferenceinpart51,similarrequirementswillbefoundinpart52,whichgovernsthewaytheEPAimplementsNSRprogramsorwhenStatestakedelegationtoimplementsuchprograms.Typically,ownersoroperatorsofminorsourceswillhavetosubmitinformationnecessarytodemonstratethattheyareexemptfromthemajorsourceconstructionpermit  requirements;therefore,theseownersoroperatorswillnothavetocomplywithalloftherequirementsshowninTablesA1andA2.     (2)RespondentActivities %  Priorto1994,theICRforNSRdidnotprovideasmuchdetailoftherelativeburdenandcostsforobtainingapermittoconstruct.Therefore,tomaintainasmuchconsistencybetweenthisICRanditspredecessors,therequiredNSRpermittingactivitieswereaggregatedintoappropriateeffortcategories,alongthelinesestablishedforthe1989ICRforCMAExhibitA.Foranalyticalconsistency,eachofthe1994effortcategoriesmaintainedthesamerelativeweightingasfoundintheICRforCMAExhibitA.SpecificactivitiesusedtodeterminetheunitburdeninthisICRanalysisarelistedinTable61.  4.0  THEINFORMATIONCOLLECTEDAGENCYACTIVITIES,COLLECTION "  METHODOLOGY,ANDINFORMATIONMANAGEMENT  (#(#     (a)StateandLocalAgencyActivities  l% #   TableA3summarizesthedataandinformationrequirementswhichStateandlocalagenciesmustmeet.TableA3alsoshowsthepart51referencesforthedataandinformationrequirementsspecified.   +\&)    (b)CollectionMethodologyandManagement&      TheownersandoperatorsofnewormodifiedstationarysourcesaffectedbytheNSRregulationswillberesponsibleforsubmittingNSRpermitapplicationstothePA.The',PAwillloginpermitapplications,storeapplicationsinacentralfilinglocationatthePA,notifyanyapplicableFederalLandManager(FLM),transmitcopiesofeachapplicationtoEPA,andentersummarydataforeachapplicationintotheEPA'sNSRBulletinBoardSystem(BBS).Onceconstructionpermitshavebeenapproved,thereviewingauthoritywillsubmitcontroltechnologyinformationtoEPA'sRACT/BACT/LAERClearinghouse(RBLC)database.Becausetheconstructionpermitsandassociatedcontroltechnologydeterminationsareperformedonacasebycasebasis,theregulationswillnotcontainadditionalformswhichownersoroperatorswillhavetofilloutandsubmittothePA.StateswilllikelyusetheircurrentpermitapplicationformsforNSRpurposes.  QualifiedpersonnelwhoworkforthePAwillperformpermitreviewsandcheckthequalityofdatasubmittedbytheapplicantonacasebycasebasis.Theapplicantwillberequiredtosubmitinformationonhowthedatawereobtained(e.g.,indicate P whetheremissionsdatawereobtainedthroughtheuseofemissionsfactorsortestdata),andhowcalculationswereperformed.ThePApersonnelwillcheckdataqualitybyreviewingtestdataandcheckingengineeringcalculations,andbyreviewingcontroltechnologydeterminationsforsimilarsources.TheRBLCandothersourceswillbereviewedforinformationoncontroltechnologydeterminationsmadeforsourcessimilartothesourcesincludedinthepermitapplication.Confidentialinformationsubmittedbytheapplicantwillbehandledbythepermitreviewingauthority'sconfidentialinformationhandlingprocedures.Thepublicwillbeprovidedtheopportunitytoreviewapermitapplication,includingFLMfindings,byobtainingacopyfromthepermitreviewingauthorityorbyattendingthepublichearing.ThepubliccanalsofindsummarydataonallapplicantsintheNSRBBS.TheNSRregulationswillnotrequireinformationthroughanytypeofsurvey.SpecificactivitiesusedtodeterminetheunitburdenforthepermittingagenciesinthisICRanalysisarelistedinTable62.  .+~&)   5.0  REGULATORYFLEXIBILITY,ENVIRONMENTALEQUITY,ANDOTHER   COLLECTIONCRITERIA t(#(#    (a)SmallEntityFlexibility i  TheRegulatoryFlexibilityActrequiresregulatoryagencies,uponregulatoryaction,toprepareseveraldocumentsdeterminedby,amongotherthings,theattributesoftheregulatoryactionbeingtaken.Theseinclude:(1)aCertification,(2)anInitialRegulatoryFlexibilityAnalysis(IRFA),and(3)aFinalRegulatoryFlexibilityAnalysis(FRFA).Inaddition,theagenciesmustassurethroughvariousmechanismsthatsmallentitiesaregivenanopportunitytoparticipateintherulemakingprocess.TheEPAhasadoptedtheseguidelinessuchthat,foranynewrulesubjecttotheRegulatoryFlexibilityAct,aregulatoryflexibilityanalysisisrequirediftherulewillhaveanyeconomicimpact,howeversmall,onanysmallentitiesthataresubjecttotherule.ThissectionofthereportprovidesananalysistoassistEPAincompletinganIRFAforthe ,'0 proposedNSRReformregulations.Aninitialregulatoryflexibilityscreeninganalysisshowedthattheproposedchangeswouldnothaveanyadverseimpactonsmallentities.   (1)Methodology   ThisreportusesanapproachcomparingemissionsdatawithSBAsizedefinitionsatthesourcecategorylevel.EmissionsdataarecurrentlybeingmaintainedbyEPAintheAerometricInformationRetrievalSystem(AIRS)database.Thisdatabaseshowsinformationattheplantandsubplantlevel,(e.g.,  H  segmentsandstacks).TheplantsreferredtointheAIRSdatabaseareequivalenttoestablishments.TheAIRSdatabasewasusedtodeterminetheindustrieslikelytobeaffectedbyNSR.TheAIRSdatabaseprovidesinformationdescribingeachsourceinthenationthatemitsover100tpyofacriteriaairpollutantand,insomeStates,smallersourcesaswell.Theinformationincludesfirmidentifierssuchasthename,address,county,andstate;SICcodes;productionparameters;process(orsegment)identifiers;pollutantidentifiers;anddescriptionsofemissioncontrolequipment,controlefficiencies,emissionrates,andannualemissions.ThedatainAIRSarerequiredtobesubmittedbyStateandlocalagencies.Thesedataaredynamicandmaybeperiodicallyupdatedbythesubmittingagencies.Forthisreason,themostrecentdatayearavailablemaydifferfromStatetoState.Typicallythesedataareavailableforbaseyear1990,butmorerecentdataareavailablefromsomeStates.ForthisanalysisthemostrecentdataforeachStatewereused.  TheAIRSdatabasedoesnotcontaincompleteinformationforalloftheparametersnecessarytocompletethisanalysisonanationallevel.ThedegreeofdetailintheinformationsubmittedbyStatescanvarywidely.Inparticular,Stateshaveonlybeenrequestedtoprovideinformationformajorsourceswhich,before1992,weredefinedasthoseemittingover100tpy(or,insomecases,250tpy).Thisanalysisrequiredinformationonsourceswithpotentialemissionsbelow100tpy.ToidentifythoseStateswhichhadvoluntarilysubmittedinformationonsourcesemittinglessthan100tpy,thelistofsourcesidentifiedintheSIPforthenonattainmentareasinagivenStatewascomparedwiththelistofsourcesintheAIRSdatabaseforthatState.TenStateswereselectedfromthislist.ForeachStateselected,datawerecollectedonemissionsofVOC,NOx,CO,andPM10,(thefourpollutantsforwhichadditional X(#+ sourcesmayberedefinedasmajorinthepartCandDregulatorychanges).ThetenStatesselectedinclude:Arizona,Connecticut,Indiana,Massachusetts,Missouri,NewYork,NewJersey,Ohio,Tennessee,WestVirginia. |,'0   The10Statesamplingprovidedinformationthathadtobeextrapolatedtoanationalscale.ThisextrapolationprocessisconsistentwiththemethodologiesutilizedinpriorNSRRegulatoryFlexibilityAnalysiswork.Basedonthisassumption,amultiplierwasdevelopedasaweightedaverageusingGrossStateProduct(GSP)figurescompiledbytheU.S.DepartmentofCommerceformajorindustrygroupings.Threeweightedmultipliersspecifictothe10Statesamplewerederived;oneforeachofthe3-digitSICcodeslistedbelow:o[X` hp x (#%'0*,.8135@8:<H?AXo@&TABLE51@<< INDUSTRYMULTIPLIERS X XdԈ      `     h      p     *7n> d d (Xe(QnR(#(#,dd", dd",edd"+  )n $t  )SIC >n- "n >IndustryGroup >n- n >Multiplier .$D "n .200299 .$  .ManufacturingNonDurableGoods XND  @3.5 @X3.5 OE@ "  @3.5  @ O300399 .$ .ManufacturingDurableGoods0 [ bX)8[>[>  @3.2 @b3.2 OE@"  @3.2  @ O400499 .$|   .TransportationandPublicFacilities XN,|   @3.6 @X3.6PFD|"  @3.6   @ P XdX   Theseweightedmultiplierswereappliedtoestimatesofthe l  numbersofaffectedsourcesforthe10States.Thismethoddoesnotsubtractoutthesourcesinattainmentareas,whicharerelativelyfew.Consequently,themethodoverstatesthenumberofaffectedsourcesinthe10Statesandcontinuestheconservativenatureofthisanalysis.  ThedataforthisanalysiswerecollectedatthethreedigitSICcodelevel,whichgroupsindustriestogetherbasedontheproductorservicetheyprovide.EntitiesprovidinggovernmentservicesareincludedintheSICcodegroupings.Manyotherdatasourcesprovidefinancialinformationattheindustrylevel.  TheSmallBusinessAdministrationhasidentifiedasetofindustriesasbeingsmallbusinessdominatedwhenover60percentoftheconstituententitiesareclassifiedassmall.Whenaverageemploymentorrevenuesarecomputedforsmallbusinessdominatedindustries,theaveragesreflectthesmallbusinessinfluence.   (2)Results   SmallGovernmentEntities.Thescreeninganalysisconsidered +&6 governmentalentities,butdeterminedthatnosmallgovernment x,'7 entities(definedasthoseservingpopulationsoflessthan50,000)wouldbeaffected.Onlyentitieswithnewsourcepermittingauthoritywouldbeaffected,andagencieswiththisauthorityaretypicallyStategovernments,municipalities,andgroupsofmunicipalitiestowhichauthorityhasbeenspecificallydelegated.Therefore,sincenosmallgovernmententitiesareaffectedbythisrule,therewillbenosignificanteconomiceffectstosmallgovernmentsasaresultoftheNSRreformchanges.  SmallBusinesses.Theproposedrulemakingdoesnotprovide  H  anyparticularsizeorcapacitybiaswhichwouldnegativelyimpactaparticularbusinesstyperelativetoitssize.Theburdenestimatesdescribedinsection6ofthisICRindicatethattheimpactofthisrulemakingistoreducethenumberofrespondents.ThereisasmallincreaseinprojectedburdenhoursonsourcessubjecttothePSDmajorsourcerequirementsprimarilyassociatedwithClassIareaanalyses.Historyhasshown,however,thattypicallyverylargesources,i.e.,notsmallbusinesses,aremostlikelytoberequiredtoprovidesubstantialinformationregardingClassIimpacts.Nonattainmentareaapplicantsshouldrealizeasmalldecreaseinburden.SincethemajorsourcethresholdsforsourcesofVOCaresmaller,itisthoughtthatthisproposedrulehassomepotentialforreducingimpactstosmallbusinessesthatmightbeotherwisesubjecttononattainmentNSR.  Overall,cumulativebenefitsareexpected,butwillberelativelysmallbecausetheproposedrulechangeswouldprovidesmallbusinesseswithreliefonlyinthoseinfrequentcaseswheretheymightotherwisebecoveredundermajorNSR.TheAgencyconcludesthattheproposedrulechangeswouldnothaveasignificanteconomicimpactonasubstantialnumberofsmallentities,andthatfurtheranalysisisnotrequiredundertheAct.   (3)MeasurestoAvertImpactsonSmallEntities  "$    TheActmakesnoprovisionforexemptingamajorstationary 4$& sourcefromNSRsimplybecauseitisasmallbusiness.Nevertheless,becausetheimpactofNSRReformwouldbetoreduceregulatoryburdenonmajor,newandmodifiedsourcesofairpollutantemissionswithoutrespecttotheireconomicclassification,andsincetheproposalimposesnonewregulatoryburdensspecificallyonsmallbusinesses,uniquemeasurestoavertimpactsonsmallentitieswerenotconsidered.   |,'0    (4)MeasurestoMitigateImpactsonSmallEntities   Sincenosignificantadverseimpactsonsmallentitieshavebeenidentified,and,infact,aburdenreductionisprojected,theAgencyhasnotconsideredanymeasurestomitigatetheimpactoftheproposedrevisionsonsmallentities.Itisassumedthatmeasurestakentolessentheimpactoftheprogramrequirements,whichhavebeenavailableinthepast,willcontinue.Implementationofsmallbusinessstationarysourcetechnicalandenvironmentalcomplianceassistanceprogramsascalledforinsection507oftheAct(attheFederalandStatelevels)canreducethereportingburdenofsmallentitieswhicharesubjecttomajorNSR.Theseprogramsmaysignificantlyalleviatetheeconomicburdenonsmallsourcesbyestablishing:1)programstoassistsmallbusinesseswithdeterminingwhatActrequirementsapplytotheirsourcesandwhentheyapply,and2)guidanceonalternativecontroltechnologiesandpollutionpreventionmeasuresforsmallbusinesses.   &  (b)CollectionSchedule I  TheNSRReformregulatoryrevisionsshouldbeproposedinApril1996andpromulgatedbyJuly1997.AnotheryearwillbenecessaryforStatestorevisetheirimplementationplans.EachsourceaffectedbytherevisedNSRregulationswillberequired'lVtosubmitanapplicationasaprerequisitetoreceivingaconstructionpermit.Preparationofaconstructionpermitapplicationisaonetimeonlyactivityforeachprojectinvolvingconstructionofanewsourceormodificationofanexistingsource.TheNSRpermitregulationsdonotrequireperiodicreportingorsurveysandNSRreformdoesnotaddressthisissue.Theburdenformonitoring,recordkeepingandreportingareaddressedintheICRsfortheCAMruleandoperatingpermitsprograms.   (c)EnvironmentalJusticeConsiderations     (1)PurposeofAnalysis    TheExecutiveOrder12898ofFebruary11,1994,requiresthateachFederalagencymakeachievingenvironmentaljustice(EJ)partofitsmission.Todothis,agenciesarerequiredtoidentifyandaddressdisproportionatelyhighadversehealthorenvironmentaleffectsofagencyprogramsonminorityandlowincomepopulations.AspartofthisplanagenciesmustconsiderEJissueswhennewrulesareproposed.ThissectionofthereportprovidessupporttoEPAinitseffortstoaddressEJissuesrelatedtotheNSRReformpackage.TheEPAsolicitedguidancefromtheAgency'sOfficeofEnvironmentalEquity(OEE); p,'0 theOfficeofPolicy,PlanningandEvaluation(OPPE);andtheOfficeofSolidWasteandEmergencyResponse(OSWER)onageneralsetofissueswhichshouldbeconsideredinpreparationofthisreport.Theseissuesincludeddescriptivestatistics,industrialconcerns,geographicconcerns,andmitigationstrategies.  ItistheAgencyspositionthatfromitsinception,theNSRprogramhasallowedfortheidentificationandconsiderationofEJissuesbythepermittingauthorityduringthepubliccommentperiodofthepermittingprocess.Seesections160and172(b)(5)(11)oftheAct.AllmajornewsourceswhetherinattainmentornonattainmentareasmustbeevaluatedforadverseimpactsonambientairqualityascomparedtothehealthbasedNAAQS..̀   (2)ImpactofNSRReform   ThemostsignificantEJconcernsaremostlikelywhenthesitingofasourceinanareawouldhavedisproportionateeffectsonminorityorlowincomepopulations.ThedatainthissectionshowthatinmanyofthenonattainmentareasaffectedbytheNSRReformchanges,housingdensityisconsiderablyhigherthantheStateandnationalaverages.WhensubsetsoftheseareascorrespondtoareaswithdisproportionatelyhighminorityorlowincomepopulationstheAgencyshouldbeespeciallysensitivetothepotentialforadverseimpactsonminoritiesandlowerincomegroups.Evenso,theprimaryeffectsoftheproposedNSRReformchangesrelevanttoconsiderationofEJwillnotbeapparentwhenconsideredatthenationallevel.TheNSRreformdealspredominantlywithprovidingrelieftothoseprojectsatexistingsourcesthatarenotlikelytogenerateanactualemissionsincreasesoranincreasewithasignificantadverseeffect.Newmajorsourcesandmodificationsthatwillresultinasignificantemissionsincrease,willstillberequiredtoinstalltheappropriatepollutioncontroltechnology,analyzeimpactsofemissionsandmitigateunacceptableconsequencesaccordingtothepermttingregulations.   (3)MitigationMeasures   TheproposedNSRReformrulemakingdoesnotincludenewstrategiestoexplicitlymitigatetheeffectofissuingpermitstomajorsourceswithrespecttoEJ.Itwould,however,provideforbetteravailabilityofinformationaboutproposedconstructionofnewsourcesandmodificationtoexistingmajorsources.Ittherebyenhancestheopportunitiesforpublicparticipationthroughthepubliccommentprocess.Further,theproposedrevisionswouldimprovetheabilityofthepublicto appealpermittingdecisionsinStatecourts.Theburden +&/ associatedwithaddressingEJissuesareassummedtobeinherentintheestimatesthathavebeenusedinthisanalysis.    (d)Nonduplication   TheinformationcollectionactivitiesrequiredundertheNSRregulationsarenotroutinelyperformedelsewherebyEPA.However,similarinformationmaybecollectedduringthedevelopmentofcertainenvironmentalimpactstatements(EIS).Insuchcases,regulationsandpoliciesrequirethatinformationcollectedforEIS'sandNSRprogramsbecoordinatedtothemaximumextentpossiblesoastominimizeduplicatingthecollectionofdata.SomeoftherequiredinformationalsomayalreadybeavailablefromStatesorotherFederalagencies.However,evenwhenthesedataareavailable,theyarenotgenerallyadequatetoaddresscompletelytherelevantNSRrequirements.   (e)Consultations   ExtensivepublicparticipationtookplaceinthedevelopmentoftheNSRReformregulationswhichaddressedthebasicinformationcollectionrequirements.FromAugust1992throughJune1993,theEPAconvenedthreeNSRsimplificationworkshops,invitingrepresentativesthatareinvolvedwithandaffectedbythemajorsourceNSRpermittingprogram.InJuly1993,theEPAformedtheNSRReformSubcommitteeundertheauspicesoftheCleanAirActAdvisoryCommittee(CAAAC),acommitteeformedinaccordancewiththeFederalAdvisoryCommitteeAct(FACA)(5U.S.C.App.2).Thiscommitteeiscomposedofrepresentativesfromindustry,Stateandlocalairpollutioncontrolagencies,environmentalorganizationsandotherFederalagencies.ThepurposeofthisSubcommitteeistoprovide,underthedirectionoftheCAAAC,independentadviceandcounseltotheEPAonpolicyandtechnicalissuesassociatedwithreformingthemajorNSRprogram.Specifically,theSubcommitteehasdevelopeddraftrecommendationsonapproachesforreformingthemajorNSRruleswiththedualobjectivesof(1)reducingprogramcomplexityandperceivedimpedimentstospeedyreviewofthecurrentsystems,and(2)maintainingtheenvironmentalgoalsandbenefitsembodiedinthecurrentprogramrequirements.PubliccommentwasalsosoughtonaJuly1994staffdraftofthecontemplatedreformrevisionsviaaFederalNoticeofameetingofNSRReformSubcommitteeconvenedtoreviewthedraft,andanannouncementonEPAsOAQPSTechnologyTransferNetwork.    p,'0   (f)EffectsofLessFrequentCollection E!  TheActandimplementingNSRregulationsrequirethesubmittalofanapplicationforeachnewnewmajorsourceormajormodification.Theinformationrequiredtobesubmittedbyeachpermitapplicantwouldbesubmittedonaonetimeonlybasis.Collectionfrequencyisnotanissue.   (g)GeneralGuidelines "  TherecordkeepingandreportingrequirementscontainedintheproposedNSRReformregualtoryrevisionsdonotexceedanyofthePaperworkReductionActguidelinescontainedin5CFR1320.6.   (h)ConfidentialityandSensitiveQuestions #   (1)Confidentiality H$  Confidentialityisnotanissueforthisrulemaking.ConsistentwithtitleIoftheAct,theinformationthatistobesubmittedbysourcesasapartoftheirpermitapplicationandupdate;applicationsforrevisionsandrenewalsisamatterofpublicrecord.Totheextentthattheinformationrequiredforthecompletenessofapermitisproprietary,confidential,orofanaturethatcouldimpairtheabilityofthesourcetomaintainitsmarketposition,thatinformationiscollectedandhandledaccordingtoEPA'spoliciessetforthintitle40,chapter1,part2,subpartBConfidentialityofBusinessInformation(see40CFR2;41FR36902,September1,1976;amendedby43FR39999,September8,1978;43FR42251,September28,1978;44FR17674,  March23,1979).   (2)SensitiveQuestions '  Theconsiderationofsensitivequestions,(i.e.,sexual,religious,personalorotherprivatematters),isnotapplicabletothisrulemaking.Theinformationgatheredforpurposesofapplyingfor,reviewingorissuinganNSRconstructionpermitforasourcedonotincludepersonaldataonanyowneroroperator.    6.0  ESTIMATINGTHEBURDENANDCOSTOFTHECOLLECTION M)%8!((#(#    Burdenmeansthetotaltime,effort,orfinancialresources '"* expendedbypersonstogenerate,maintain,retain,ordiscloseorprovideinformationtoorforaFederalagency.Thisincludesthetimeneededtoreviewinstructions;develop,acquire,install,andutilizetechnologyandsystemsforthepurposesofcollecting,validating,andverifyinginformation,processingandmaintaininginformation,anddisclosingandproviding ,'0 information;adjusttheexistingwaystocomplywithanypreviouslyapplicableinstructionsandrequirements;trainpersonneltobeabletorespondtoacollectionofinformation;searchdatasources;completeandreviewthecollectionofinformation;andtransmitorotherwisedisclosetheinformation.Theburdenestimateshouldbecomposedof(1)atotalcapitalandstartupcostcomponentannualizedoveritsusefullife;(2)atotaloperation,maintenanceandpurchasesofservicescomponent.Eachcomponentshouldbedividedintoburdenbornedirectlybytherespondentandanyservicesthatarecontractedout.   (a)EstimatingRespondentBurdenandCosts ,.   (i)CapitalandStartupCost .  CapitalandStartupcostincludeamongotheritems,preparationsforcollectinginformationsuchaspurchasingcomputersandsoftware,monitoring,sampling,drilling,andtestingequipment.Asapracticalmatterthesecostsarenottypicalofcostsassociatedwithpreparingamajorsourcepermitapplication.Evenifanapplicantisabrandnewcompanyandtheprospectivesourceisa greenfieldsource(ofwhichtheEPAestimateslessthanonepercentoftherespondentsfitthatdescription)mostandperhapsalloftheequipmentneededtopreparepermitapplications,e.g.,thecomputersandbasicsoftware,willbepartofthesourcesbusinessoperationinventory.Furthermore,muchofthedataandregulatoryandpolicyinformationformakingtechnologydeterminationsandevenmodelsforperformingambientairimpactanalysesareavailableinelectronicformfromseveraldifferentEPAbulletinboardsforjustthecommunicationchargeswhicharetypicallyhiddeninroutinebusinessexpenses.  Itisestimatedthatabout25percentof greenfieldmajorsourcepermitapplicantshavetoconductpreapplicationambientmonitoringfortheimpactsanalyses.TheproposedNSRReformrulemakingrequestscommentsonhowtheAgencycaneliminatethisrequirement,sothisanalysiswillconservativelyassumetheproposedrulewillhavenoimpactonthisburden.PreviousICRshaveincoporatedthelaborassociatedwiththepreapplicationmonitoring,buthavenotbeenrequiredtoreportthecapitalorotherdirectcosts.Consequently,thebaselinedoesnotsuccinctlyreflectthiscost.TheEPAhascompiledlittledataonthecostofpreapplicationmonitoring,butisinvestigatingthisissueandinvitescommentonthiscostelement.NotwithstandingtheaboveforthepurposesofthisICR,theEPAassumesthatpreparationofapermitapplicationismostsimilartoastartupcostandwill,therefore,reportitassuch.̀ p,'0   TheEPAisawarethatahighpercentageofpermitapplicationsarepreparedinwholeorinpartbytechnicalandlegalconsultingfirms.Havingneverbeenrequiredtoascertainthedistributionorpercentageofspecificpartsoftheapplicationsthatarepreparedthroughcontractservices,however,thisinformationhasnotbeencompiledbyEPA.Oftenthisinformationisheldasproprietarybysources.ForthepurposesofthisICRanalysestheEPAwillassumethatanaverageof30percentofthetotaleffortinpreparingpermitapplicationsiscontractedandthattheproposedNSRReformrevisionswillnotaffectthedistributioninanymanner.Consequently,theamountofcontractedpreparationservicescanbeestimatedbymultiplyingtheestimatedtotalhourlyburdenandcostreportedinTable61byafactorof0.3.TheEPAinvitescommentsonthisestimateandmethodology.  RespondentsincludeownersoroperatorsofmajorstationarysourceswhichwillbesubjecttotheconstructionpermitrequirementsunderEPA'sNSRregulations.Table61liststherespondentactivities,burden,andestimatedcostsoftheproposedNSRReformpackage.ThisanalysisestimatesanincreaseinburdenforPSDpermitdevelopmentinClassIareasof18hours,andadecreaseof7hoursbecauseoftheBACTcutoffdate,foranetincreaseof11hoursperpermit.UsingtheSeptember1995ICRasabaseline,thenewcumulativePSDpermitdevelopmentestimateis711hourspersource.TheSeptember1995ICRestimatedtheaveragepartDpermitdevelopmentburdenat450hourspersource.ThebenefittopartDsourcesoftheproposedreformswasthereducedtheburdenoftheBACTandLAERanalyses.Thereductionwasestimatedatapproximately1percentofthetotalburdentosources,orapproximately5hours.Therefore,theoverallpartDpermitdevelopmentburdenwasestimatedat445hourspersource.Asindicated,theNSRprogramwouldrequireanestimatedburdenof380,500hoursunderproposedNSRReforms,whichwouldconstituteareductionofabout265,000hours(over40percent)fromtheSeptember1995ICRbaseline.  ThecostvaluesinTable61wouldordinarilybe%  %I?derivedfromadiscountednetpresentvalueofthestreamofcoststhatwouldoccuroverthelifeofthepermitprogram,ortheICR,whicheverisshorter.However,inthecaseofNSR,thereareonlyupfrontcosts.Theburdenandcostofapplyingforandissuingeachpermitisunique.Further,themonitoring,recordkeepingandreportingburdenandresultantcostsareaddressedinICRsfortheCAMruleandoperatingpermitsprograms.Therefore,thecostsoftheNSRruleforthesecondandthirdyearsoftheICR,asmodifiedbythisproposal,arezero.TheannualizedvalueofthecostsoftheproposedNSRpackageisequaltothecostofthefirstyearlyoutlay. p,'0 Ї  ThecostsinTable61aredeterminedbymultiplyingtheestimatednumberofhoursforeachburdencategoryby$45.00perhour.ThisvaluewasestimatedsimilarlytocostsinpriorNSRimpactanalyses,the1992part70permittingprogramICR,andthe1994part71FederalpermittingprogramICR.Itrepresentsa$41perhourinhouselaborrateanda$55perhourconsultantrate,utilizedataratioof70percentto30percent,respectively.Theestimatedcostsavingstorespondentsresultingfromtheproposedreformswouldcometoabout$11.9million.   (ii)CostofOperation,MaintenanceandPurchaseofServices hD  TheEPAassumesthatthiscomponentdealswiththeoperationandmaintenanceofthecapitalequipmentdescribedin6(a)(i)eitherdirectlybythesourceowneroroperatororbyafirmcontractedtooperateandmaintainthecapitalequipment.Sincethepuchaseofcapitalequipmentisbelievedtobeaninsignificantfactorinpermitapplicationpreparation,theEPAassumestheoperation,maintenanceorservicesforsamearenegligible.Again,theEPAinvitescommentonthisassumption.  @ 4$9OY @&TABLE61  @ RESPONDENTBURDENANDCOSTSX&XX Xd{XX&Ԉ t *w2n5dddd" dd"edd"7n>(#(#w,w(,I,,,,8(+  ," T 8, -# -Activity 3) 3No.Units 3)P3 3HoursPerUnit 3)P3 3TotalHours 3)P 3 3Cost OE# 3 8 ,OI.PartC(PSD) 0&@  0 '@  ' '@ ' '@ ' ?5@ , ,? -#0 -A.PreparationandPlanning -#0 - '0 ' '0 ' '0 ' ?50 , ,? -#  -ЀDeterminationofComplianceRequirements TJ  b@144b@T144 tj9 3 b@144 b@  U@86U@t86 qg8 3  U@86 U@  @@P0@q12,384 wm6 3P  @@ 0@ @F@45P!Aw$557,280 kaI 3P @F@45 , !A ,k -# | -ЀObtainguidanceonDataNeeds KA | @ b@K144 ka0 |3 @ b@  U@86U@k86 qg8 | 3  U@86 U@  @@P0@q12,384 wm6 |!3P  @@ 0@ @F@45P!Aw$557,280 kaI |"3P @F@45 , !A ,k -# l# -ЀPreparationofBACTEngineeringAnalysis KA l$ @ b@K144 ka0 l%3 @ b@  U@86U@k86 qg8 l&3  U@86 U@  @@P0@q12,384 wm6 l'3P  @@ 0@ @F@45P!Aw$557,280 kaI l(3P @F@45 , !A ,k -# \) -B.DataCollectionandAnalysis -# \* - ' \+ ' ' \, ' ' \- ' ?5 \. , ,? -# L / -ЀAirQualityModelling TJ L 0 b@144b@T144 uk9 L 13 b@144 b@ @i@202@i@u202 rh9 L 23 @i@202 @i@  @@Ph@r29,088 wm6 L 33P  @@ h@ @F@45P 3Aw$1,308,960 kaI L 43P @F@45 ,  3A ,k -# < 5 -ЀDeterminationofImpactonAirQualityRelatedValues TJ < 6 b@144b@T144 tj9 < 73 b@144 b@  I@50I@t50 qg8 < 83  I@50 I@  @@P @q7,200 wm6 < 93P  @@  @ @F@45PAw$324,000 kaI < :3P @F@45 , A ,k -# , ; -ЀPre-constructionAirQualityMonitoring TJ , < b@144b@T144 tj9 , =3 b@144 b@  I@50I@t50 qg8 , >3  I@50 I@  @@P @q7,200 wm6 , ?3P  @@  @ @F@45PAw$324,000 kaI , @3P @F@45 , A ,k -# A -ЀPost-constructionAirQualityMonitoring TJ B b@144b@T144 tj9 C3 b@144 b@  I@50I@t50 qg8 D3  I@50 I@  @@P @q7,200 wm6 E3P  @@  @ @F@45PAw$324,000 kaI F3P @F@45 , A ,k -# G -C.PermitApplication -# H - ' I ' ' J ' ' K ' ?5 L , ,? -# M -ЀPreparationandSubmittalofPermitApplication TJ N b@144b@T144 tj9 O3 b@144 b@  J@52J@t52 qg8 P3  J@52 J@  @@P@@q7,488 wm6 Q3P  @@ @@ @F@45PAw$336,960 kaI R3P @F@45 , A ,k -#S -ЀPublicHearings TJT b@144b@T144 tj9U3 b@144 b@  @@33@@t33 qg8V3  @@33 @@  @@P@q4,752 wm6W3P  @@ @ @F@45P Aw$213,840 kaIX3P @F@45 ,  A ,k -#pY -ЀRevisionstoPermit TJpZ b@144b@T144 tj9p[3 b@144 b@  0@160@t16 qg8p\3  0@16 0@  @@P@q2,304 wm6p]3P  @@ @ @F@45PP@w$103,680 kaIp^3P @F@45 , P@ ,k -#`_ -D.TOTAL TJ`` b@144b@T144 rh9`a3 b@144 b@  08@r711 oe6`b3  0 8@  0P@o102,384 oe6`c3P  0 @  0PLQAo$4,607,280 cYA`d3P  0 , LQA ,c -#Pe -E.1995BaselineBurden -#Pf - 'Pg ' Ph w t<<C:\EDRIVE\REFORM\PROPOSAL\RIA\REV95ICR.WK4>>A:E17..A:E17PX A224,000 Pi3P w t<<C:\EDRIVE\REFORM\PROPOSAL\RIA\REV95ICR.WK4>>A:E17..A:E17 X A @F@45P9cA$10,080,000 kaIPj3P @F@45 , 9cA ,k 1'@k 1F.EstimatedIncrease(Reduction)inBurden 0&@l 0 KA@m  @@PK(121,616) oe6@n3P  @@   @@PtTo($5,472,720) mcA@o3P  @@ , tT ,mII.PARTD(Nonattainment) 0&0p 0 '0q ' '0r ' '0s ' ?50t , ,? -# u -A.PreparationandPlanning -# v - ' w ' ' x ' ' y ' ?5 z , ,? -#|{ -ЀDeterminationofComplianceRequirements VL|| p@265.5p@V266 vl;|}3 p@265.5 p@  R@75R@v75 qg8|~3  R@75 R@  @@P r@q19,913 wm6|3P  @@  r@ @F@45P}X+Aw$896,063 kaI|3P @F@45 , }X+A ,k -#l -ЀObtainguidanceonDataNeeds VLl p@265.5p@V266 vl;l3 p@265.5 p@  R@75R@v75 qg8l3  R@75 R@  @@P r@q19,913 wm6l3P  @@  r@ @F@45P}X+Aw$896,063 kaIl3P @F@45 , }X+A ,k -#\ -B.DataCollectionandAnalysis -#\ - '\ ' '\ ' '\ ' ?5\ , ,? -#L -ЀPreparationofLAEREngineeringAnalysis VLL p@265.5p@V266 vl;L3 p@265.5 p@  4@204@v20 qg8L3  4@20 4@  @@P@q5,310 wm6L3P  @@ @ @F@45P0+ Aw$238,950 kaIL3P @F@45 , 0+ A ,k -#< -ЀDemonstrateOffsets VL< p@265.5p@V266 vl;<3 p@265.5 p@  D@40D@v40 qg8<3  D@40 D@  @@P@q10,620 wm6<3P  @@ @ @F@45P0+Aw$477,900 kaI<3P @F@45 , 0+A ,k -#, -ЀPrepareAnalysisofAlternativeSites,Processes,etc. VL, p@265.5p@V266 vl;,3 p@265.5 p@  N@60N@v60 qg8,3  N@60 N@  @@P@q15,930 wm6,3P  @@ @ @F@45Pd%Aw$716,850 kaI,3P @F@45 , d%A ,k -# -ЀAirQualityModelling VL p@265.5p@V266 wm;3 p@265.5 p@ Y@100Y@w100 rh93 Y@100 Y@  @@P@r26,550 wm63P  @@ @ @F@45P:2Aw$1,194,750 kaI3P @F@45 , :2A ,k -#  -C.PermitApplication -#  - '  ' '  ' '  ' ?5  , ,? -# -ЀPreparationandSubmittalofPermitApplication VL p@265.5p@V266 vl;3 p@265.5 p@  C@38C@v38 qg83  C@38 C@  @@P@q10,089 wm63P  @@ @ @F@45PԵAw$454,005 kaI3P @F@45 , ԵA ,k -#  -ЀPublicHearings VL  p@265.5p@V266 vl; 3 p@265.5 p@  9@259@v25 qg8 3  9@25 9@  @@P@q6,638 wm6 3P  @@ @ @F@45P:Aw$298,688 kaI 3P @F@45 , :A ,k -#p! -ЀRevisionstoPermit VLp! p@265.5p@V266 vl;p!3 p@265.5 p@  (@12(@v12 qg8p!3  (@12 (@  @@P@q3,186 wm6p!3P  @@ @ @F@45PPAw$143,370 kaIp!3P @F@45 , PA ,k -#`" -D.TOTAL VL`" p@265.5p@V266 tj;`"3 p@265.5 p@  0{@t445 oe6`"3  0 {@  0P8@o118,148 wm6`"3P  0 8@ @F@45P`HTAw$5,316,638 kaI`"3P @F@45 , `HTA ,k -#P#  -E.1995BaselineBurden -#P#  - 'P#  ' P#  w t<<C:\EDRIVE\REFORM\PROPOSAL\RIA\REV95ICR.WK4>>A:E31..A:E31p4A265500 P# 3 w t<<C:\EDRIVE\REFORM\PROPOSAL\RIA\REV95ICR.WK4>>A:E31..A:E31 p4A @F@45PfA$11,947,500 kaIP# 3P @F@45 , fA ,k 1'@$! 1F.EstimatedIncrease(Reduction)inBurden 0&@$! 0 KA@$!  @@PK(147,353) wm6@$!3P  @@  @F@45PsKYw($6,630,863) ukI@$!3P @F@45 , sKY ,uIII.MinorNSRPermitting 0&0%" 0 '0%" ' '0%" ' '0%" ' ?50%" , ,? -# &# -A.PrepareandSubmitPermitApplication VL &# @20000@V20000 uk; &#3 @20000 @   @8 @u8 pf7 &#3   @8  @  @@PAp160,000 wm6 &#3P  @@ A @F@45P@w[Aw$7,200,000 kaI &#3P @F@45 , @w[A ,k -#'|$ -B.1995BaselineBurden -#'|$ - ''|$ ' QG'|$  A156000P AQ156,000 }s<'|$3P  A156000  A @F@45PxZA}$7,020,000 kaI'|$3P @F@45 , xZA ,k -#(l% -C.EstimatedChangeinBurden -#(l% - '(l% ' KA(l%  @@@@K4000 wm6(l%3  @@ @@ @F@45PAw$180,000 ukI(l%3P @F@45 , A ,uIV.TOTALS 0&(\& 0 '(\& ' '(\& ' '(\& ' ?5(\& , ,? 1')L' 1A.TotalBurdenBasedonProposedReforms 0&)L' 0 QG)L' @@@P9AQ380,532 }s<)L'3P @@@ 9A @F@45PؤTpA}$17,123,918 kaI)L'3P @F@45 , ؤTpA ,k -#*<( -B.1995TotalBaselineBurden -#*<( - '*<( ' QG*<( @@@P#AQ645,500 }s<*<(3P @@@ #A @F@45P{A}$29,047,500 kaI*<(3P @F@45 , {A ,k 1'+,) 1C.EstimatedIncrease(Reduction)inBurden 0&+,) 0 KA+,)  @@P",K(264,969) wm6+,)3P  @@ ", @F@45Pfw($11,923,583) j`I+,)3P @F@45 , f ,j*Costisin1994dollars+!,,* , *  +H {HXdX H  -+ 9OY     (b)EstimatingtheStateandLocalAgencyBurdenandCost   Table62liststheStateandlocalagencyburdenandcostsassociatedwiththemajorNSRpermittingrequirements,asmodifiedbytheproposedReformchangesdescribedinsection3ofthisanalysis.TherewouldbeanestimatedincreaseinburdenduetotheincreasedClassIarearequirementsintheproposedNSRreformsofabout9hourspersource.However,eliminatingfurtheranalyses,meetingsandnegotiationslateinthepermittingprocesswasestimatedtosaveanaverageof14hoursperpermit.WithotherstreamliningattributestheNSRReformswereprojectedtoreduceStateandlocalagencyburdenbyatotalof8hoursforaresultingburdenestimateof272hourspermajorsourcepermit.TheSeptember1995ICRestimatedthepartDNSRpermitprocessingburdentoState/localagenciestobe110hours.Theactualburdenreductionperpermitofthisproposedrulemakingisexpectedtobestatisticallynegligible.TheproposedNSRreformsarenotexpectedtoimpactthepartDmajorsourcereviewresponsibilitiesoftheStatesandlocalagencies,nevertheless,theactualhourlyburdenbyitemcametoasumof109.TheprojectedNSRprogramtotalburdenonStatesandlocalagencies,ifthereformrevisionsarepromulgated,wouldbe268,162hoursrepresentingasavingsof78,190hoursfromtheSeptember1995ICRbaseline.̀  Asisthecasewiththerespondents,StateandlocalagencieswhowillapproveNSRpermitswillonlyhavestartupcostsforanygivenpermit.Consequently,whiletheStateorlocalagencywillapprovemanypermitseachyear,theannualburdenforthatfunctionissimplyequaltotheburdenfoundinanyoneyear.    (c)EstimatingAgencyBurdenandCost   TheEPARegionalOfficestypicallyreviewmajorNSRpermits.TheEPAreviewofNSRpermitsisexpectedtoconsistofthetaskswithassociatedburdenhourslistedinTable63.ThesetasksresultinanupperboundontheEPAburdenof15hoursperpermitforPSDsourcesandfornonattainmentNSR.Forminornewsourcereviewapplications,theAgencyexpectsthatitsentireburdenforeachpermitwillbelimitedtothereviewandverificationoftheapplicabilitydeterminationofthatsource.TheestimatedburdenforeachminorNSRpermitisthesameasthatforamajorNSRapplicabilitydetermination,2hoursperapplication;howevertheEPAanticipatesthatitwillonlyauditabout10percentoftheminorsourcepermitsduetothecontinuingtrendtoentrustthisprogramresponsibilitytotheStates.Thecostestimateusesawageandoverheadrateof$34hour(basedonaFederalwagerateattheGrade11,step3levelforthe1994payschedule,adjustedforoverheadandotherappropriatecosts).Thiswage  D-(1 @&TABLE62@ STATEANDLOCALAGENCYBURDENANDCOSTSX&XXHXd{XX&*n:d+dw(I8(2n5(#(#,(,,,X,X,e(+  ," P 8, -# -Activity 3) 3Unit 3)3 3HoursPerUnit 3) ` 3 3TotalHours 3)L 3 3ЀCost* KA# 3 8 ,KI. 3) P  3PARTC(PSD) -# P - ' P ' ' P ' ' P ' ?5 P , ,? -# @ -A.AttendPreapplicationMeetings TJ @ b@144b@T144 tj9 @3 b@144 b@  B@36B@t36 qg8 @3  B@36 B@  @@@@q5184 wm6 @3  @@ @@ @A@34QAw$176,256.0 kaI @3Q @A@34 , A ,k -# 0 -B.AnswerRespondentQuestions TJ 0 b@144b@T144 tj9 03 b@144 b@  4@204@t20 qg8 03  4@20 4@  @@@q2880 wm6 03  @@ @ @A@34Q@w$97,920.0 kaI 03Q @A@34 , @ ,k -#  -C.LogInandReviewDatàSubmissions TJ ! b@144b@T144 tj9 "3 b@144 b@  0@160@t16 qg8 #3  0@16 0@  @@@q2304 wm6 $3  @@ @ @A@34Q @w$78,336.0 kaI %3Q @A@34 ,  @ ,k -# & -D.RequestAdditionalInformation TJ ' b@144b@T144 si9 (3 b@144 b@   @8 @s8 pf7 )3   @8  @  @@@p1152 wm6 *3  @@ @ @A@34Q @w$39,168.0 kaI +3Q @A@34 ,  @ ,k -#t , -E.AnalyzeforandProvidèConfidentialityProtection TJ8 . b@144b@T144 tj9t /3 b@144 b@  8@248@t24 qg8t 03  8@24 8@  @@@q3456 wm6t 13  @@ @ @A@34Q@w$117,504.0 kaIt 23Q @A@34 , @ ,k -#(x 3 -F.PrepareCompletedApplicationsforProcessing TJ(x 4 b@144b@T144 tj9(x 53 b@144 b@  @@32@@t32 qg8(x 63  @@32 @@  @@@q4608 wm6(x 73  @@ @ @A@34Q Aw$156,672.0 kaI(x 83Q @A@34 ,  A ,k -#h 9 -G.FileandTransmitCopies TJh : b@144b@T144 si9h ;3 b@144 b@   @8 @s8 pf7h <3   @8  @  @@@p1152 wm6h =3  @@ @ @A@34Q @w$39,168.0 kaIh >3Q @A@34 ,  @ ,k -#X? -H.PreparePreliminaryDetermination TJX@ b@144b@T144 tj9XA3 b@144 b@  8@248@t24 qg8XB3  8@24 8@  @@@q3456 wm6XC3  @@ @ @A@34Q@w$117,504.0 kaIXD3Q @A@34 , @ ,k -#HE -I.PrepareNoticesforandAttendPublicHearings TJHF b@144b@T144 tj9HG3 b@144 b@  D@40D@t40 qg8HH3  D@40 D@  @@@q5760 wm6HI3  @@ @ @A@34QAw$195,840.0 kaIHJ3Q @A@34 , A ,k -#8K -J.ApplicationApproval TJ8L b@144b@T144 tj98M3 b@144 b@  D@40D@t40 qg88N3  D@40 D@  @@@q5760 wm68O3  @@ @ @A@34QAw$195,840.0 kaI8P3Q @A@34 , A ,k -#(Q -K.NotificationofApplicantofPADetermination TJ(R b@144b@T144 si9(S3 b@144 b@   @8 @s8 pf7(T3   @8  @  @@@p1152 wm6(U3  @@ @ @A@34Q @w$39,168.0 kaI(V3Q @A@34 ,  @ ,k -#W -L.SubmittalonInformationtoBACT/LAERtoRBLC TJY b@144b@T144 tj9Z3 b@144 b@  0@160@t16 qg8[3  0@16 0@  @@@q2304 wm6\3  @@ @ @A@34Q @w$78,336.0 kaI]3Q @A@34 ,  @ ,k -#|^ -M.Total TJ|_ b@144b@T144 uk9|`3 b@144 b@ q@272q@u272 rh9|a3 q@272 q@  0 @r39168 oe6|b3  0  @  0QR4Ao$1,331,712.0 i_A|c3Q  0 , R4A ,iII. 3)ld 3PARTD(Nonattainment) -#le - 'lf ' 'lg ' 'lh ' ?5li , ,? -#\j -A.AttendPreapplicationMeetings TJ\k p@266p@T266 si9\l3 p@266 p@  @7@s7 pf7\m3  @7 @  @@@p1862 wm6\n3  @@ @ @A@34Q@w$63,308.0 kaI\o3Q @A@34 , @ ,k -#Lp -B.AnswerRespondentQuestions TJLq p@266p@T266 tj9Lr3 p@266 p@  $@10$@t10 qg8Ls3  $@10 $@  @@Ȥ@q2660 wm6Lt3  @@ Ȥ@ @A@34Q@w$90,440.0 kaILu3Q @A@34 , @ ,k -#<v -C.LogInandReviewDataSubmissions TJ<w p@266p@T266 si9<x3 p@266 p@   @8 @s8 pf7<y3   @8  @  @@@p2128 wm6<z3  @@ @ @A@34Q@w$72,352.0 kaI<{3Q @A@34 , @ ,k -#,|| -D.RequestAdditionalInformation TJ,|} p@266p@T266 si9,|~3 p@266 p@  @4@s4 pf7,|3  @4 @  @@@p1064 wm6,|3  @@ @ @A@34Q@w$36,176.0 kaI,|3Q @A@34 , @ ,k -#l -E.AnalyzeforandProvideConfidentialityProtection TJl p@266p@T266 si9l3 p@266 p@  @4@s4 pf7l3  @4 @  @@@p1064 wm6l3  @@ @ @A@34Q@w$36,176.0 kaIl3Q @A@34 , @ ,k -# \ -F.PrepareCompletedApplicationsforProcessing TJ \ p@266p@T266 tj9 \3 p@266 p@  (@12(@t12 qg8 \3  (@12 (@  @@@q3192 wm6 \3  @@ @ @A@34Q@w$108,528.0 kaI \3Q @A@34 , @ ,k -#L -G.FileandTransmitCopies TJL p@266p@T266 si9L3 p@266 p@  @4@s4 pf7L3  @4 @  @@@p1064 wm6L3  @@ @ @A@34Q@w$36,176.0 kaIL3Q @A@34 , @ ,k -# < -H.PreparePreliminaryDetermination TJ < p@266p@T266 si9 <3 p@266 p@   @8 @s8 pf7 <3   @8  @  @@@p2128 wm6 <3  @@ @ @A@34Q@w$72,352.0 kaI <3Q @A@34 , @ ,k -#!, -I.PrepareNoticesforandAttendPublicHearings TJ!, p@266p@T266 tj9!,3 p@266 p@  2@182@t18 qg8!,3  2@18 2@  @@@q4788 wm6!,3  @@ @ @A@34Q@Aw$162,792.0 kaI!,3Q @A@34 , @A ,k -#" -J.ApplicationApproval TJ" p@266p@T266 tj9"3 p@266 p@  0@160@t16 qg8"3  0@16 0@  @@@q4256 wm6"3  @@ @ @A@34QAw$144,704.0 kaI"3Q @A@34 , A ,k -##  -K.NotificationofApplicantofPADetermination TJ#  p@266p@T266 si9# 3 p@266 p@  @2@s2 pf7# 3  @2 @  @@@p532 wm6# 3  @@ @ @A@34Q@w$18,088.0 kaI# 3Q @A@34 , @ ,k -#$ -L.SubmittalonInformationtoBACT/LAERtoRBLC TJp%  p@266p@T266 tj9$3 p@266 p@  0@160@t16 qg8$3  0@16 0@  @@@q4256 wm6$3  @@ @ @A@34QAw$144,704.0 kaI$3Q @A@34 , A ,k -#`&! -M.Total TJ`&! p@266p@T266 uk9`&!3 p@266 p@ @[@109@[@u109 rh9`&!3 @[@109 @[@  0P@r28994 oe6`&!3  0 P@  0Q.Ao$985,796.0 i_A`&!3Q  0 , .A ,iIII. 3)P'" 3MinorSourcePermits VLP'" @20000@V20000 vl;P'"3 @20000 @  $@10$@v10 qg8P'"3  $@10 $@  @@jAq200000 wm6P'"3  @@ jA @A@34QYAw$6,800,000.0 qgIP'"3Q @A@34 , YA ,q!V. 7-@(# 7GrandTotalState&LocalBurdenAfterNSRReform \R@(# @@@^A\268162 u>@(#3 @@@ ^A @@@QcaA$9,117,508.0 qgI@(#3Q @@@ , caA ,qV. 3)0)$ 3September1995ICRBurden -#0)$ - '0)$ ' KA0)$ #A346352#AK346352 wm60)$3 #A346352 #A vfA11776000PvfAw$11,776,000 qgI0)$3P vfA11776000 , vfA ,qVI. 3) *p% 3Costor(Savings)fromBaseline -# *p% - ' *p% ' KA *p% -78190K(78190) wm6 *p%3 -78190  ^HD-2658492P^HDw($2,658,492) pfI *p%3P ^HD-2658492 , ^HD ,p*Costarein1994Dollars1'% +p& , !  1#X&X{#  ,( 4'4'{XX&*<%n=d"d(XXe(n:(#(#,(,,,,(+  0&  805' 5' @0 TABLE6-3 @0 FEDERALBURDENANDCOSTS#X&X{#{XX& B8 " 8  ,B ' ' -# -Hours 3)3 3Total 3)3 3Total KA#3 , ,KActivity 3) 3Units 3) 3 3perUnit 3) 3 3Hours 3) 3 3Cost* E;# 3 , ,EI.MajorSourcePermits '|  ' '| ' '| ' '| ' E;| , ,EA.ReviewandVerifyApplicabilityDetermination TJl  @510@T510 si9l 3 @510 @  @2@s2 pf7l 3  @2 @  @@@p1020 wm6l 3  @@ @ @A@34P@w$34,680 qgIl 3P @A@34 , @ ,qB.ReviewControlTechnologyDetermination TJ\  @510@T510 si9\ 3 @510 @  @3@s3 pf7\ 3  @3 @  @@@p1530 wm6\ 3  @@ @ @A@34Pf@w$52,020 qgI\ 3P @A@34 , f@ ,qC.EvaluateOffsets TJL  @510@T510 si9L 3 @510 @  ?1?s1 pf7L 3  ?1 ?  @@@p510 wm6L 3  @@ @ @A@34P@w$17,340 qgIL  3P @A@34 , @ ,qD.EvaluateAirQualityModeling TJ< ! @510@T510 si9< "3 @510 @  @4@s4 pf7< #3  @4 @  @@@p2040 wm6< $3  @@ @ @A@34P@w$69,360 qgI< %3P @A@34 , @ ,qE.EvaluateAlternativeandSecondaryImpactAnalysis TJ, |& @510@T510 si9, |'3 @510 @  @2@s2 pf7, |(3  @2 @  @@@p1020 wm6, |)3  @@ @ @A@34P@w$34,680 qgI, |*3P @A@34 , @ ,qF.EvaluateClassIAreaAnalysis TJl + @510@T510 si9l ,3 @510 @  @2@s2 pf7l -3  @2 @  @@@p1020 wm6l .3  @@ @ @A@34P@w$34,680 qgIl /3P @A@34 , @ ,qG.AdministrativeTasks TJ \ 0 @510@T510 si9 \ 13 @510 @  ?1?s1 pf7 \ 23  ?1 ?  @@@p510 wm6 \ 33  @@ @ @A@34P@w$17,340 qgI \ 43P @A@34 , @ ,qH.TOTAL TJL 5 @510@T510 tj9L 63 @510 @  .@15.@t15 qg8L 73  .@15 .@  @@@q7650 wm6L 83  @@ @ @A@34P Aw$260,100 kaIL 93P @A@34 ,  A ,kII.Minorsourcepermits '< : ' '< ; ' '< < ' '< = ' :0< > , ,:A.#X&X{ #{XX&Reviewandverifytheapplicabilitydetermination I?, ? @@2000@@I2000 h^4, @3 @@2000 @@  @2@h2 h^1, A3  @2 @ @@4000@@h4000 I?4, B3 @@4000 @@ I$136,000 5+, C3 , ,5III.GrandtotalBurdenandcost 'D ' 'E3 ' J@F3 @11650@J11650 J@5G3 @11650 @ J$396,100 5+H3 , ,5IV.ProjectedBurdenandCostimpacts ' I ' ' J3 ' ' K3 ' ' L3 ' 5+ M3 , ,5A.1995BaselineCost 'N ' 'O3 ' J@P3 &@17560&@J17,560 nd5Q3 &@17560 &@ 8"A5970008"An$597,000 YO<R3 8"A597000 , 8"A ,YB.Costor(Savings)fromBaseline 'S ' 'T3 ' J@U3 -5910J(5910) J@5V3 -5910  J($251,900) D:W3 , ,D*AllCostsareinthousandsof1994dollars;Laborrateis$34.00/hourincl.overheadandbenefits6,*X ,   6 5'# #5'6' {6'#XdX O#rateisconsistentwithpreviousNSRandoperatingpermits 8Z analyses.  NotethattheSeptember1995programICRneglectedtoincludetheFederalburdenforreviewingminorsources.7'7'8'  8^ 8'9'9':'IXIXXXI:'    (d)ReasonsforChangeinBurden   AmajorobjectiveoftheproposedNSRReformrulemakingistoreducetheregulatoryburdentorespondents,Stateandlocalagencies,andtheFederalGovernmentforthepermittingofmajorstationarysources.AsshowninTables61through63thereisaprojectedreductioninburdenprimarilyduetotheprojectedeliminationofover500majorsourcepermitapplicationsthatwouldotherwiseberequiredforproposedmodificationstoexistingmajorsources.Theproposedrevisionstodetermininganactualemissionsbaselinefornettingandtheallowanceofsourcestodeterminenetemissionincreasesbasedonprojectedfutureannualemissions(bothdescribedinsection3above)createdabout80percentoftheprojectedreduction.Thehourlyburdenperresponse,i.e.,perpermitapplication,increasedslightly(11hours)forpartCPSDpermitsanddecreasedslightly(5hours)forpartDnonattainmentareapermits.   ,(r   TheFederal,Stateandlocalpermittingagencieswouldalso enjoyaburdenreductionasaresultofthedecreaseinthenumberofmajorsourcepermits.StateandlocalagencyhourlyburdensforreviewingandprocessingpermitswerepredictedtodecreaseslightlyforPSDandremainaboutthesamepartDNSR.Federalhourlyburdenswerenotprojectedtochange.Thenumberofminorsourcepermitswasprojectedtoincreasecommensuratelywiththedecreaseinmajorsourcepermits.Thehourlyburdenforminorsourcepermitapplicationswerenotprojectedtochange.    (e)BottomLineBurdenHoursandCosts/BurdenTables $    Table64summarizestheprojectedburdenandcoststhatwouldbeincurredbyindustryandFederal,StateandlocalpermittingagenciesiftheproposedNSRreformrulemakingrevisionsarepromulgated.Forindustryrespondents,theburdenestimatedinthisICRisover40percentpercentlowerthantheSeptember1995ICRbaseline.TheAgencyanticipatesrespondentswouldincuranannualcostof$17.1millionforpermittingduetothisrulemaking,asavingsof$11.9millionperyearfromtheSeptember1995ICRbaseline.Inaddition,theproposedNSRReformpackagewouldreducethecorrespondingcosttoStateandlocalagenciesbyapproximately$2.6millionperyear.FortheFederalGovernment,however,thesavingsderivedformthisrulemakingaremuchsmaller,ontheorderof$250thousandperyear.;';'    (f)BurdenStatement '  TheinformationcollectionrequirementsinthisproposedrulehavebeensubmittedforapprovaltoOMBunderthePaperworkReductionAct,44U.S.C.3501et.seq.AnICRdocumenthasbeenpreparedbytheEPAandacopymaybeobtainedfromSandyFarmer,InformationPolicyBranch(2136),U.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency,401MSt.,Washington,D.C.20460,(202)2602740.RequestICRNo.1713.01.  Theaverageannualburdenforthiscollectionofinformationisapproximately353thousandhoursperyearforpermittedunits,or711hoursforpartCPSDsourcesand445hoursforpartDnonattaimentsources.Thisincludestimeforreviewinginstructions,searchingexistingdatasources,gatheringandmaintainingthedataneeded,andcompletingandreviewingthecollectionofinformation.Notethatthisisacumulativeburden;contractedservicesforthiseffortareestimatedtobeabout30percentofthetotal.  Sendcommentsregardingtheburdenestimateoranyotheraspectofthiscollectionofinformation,includingsuggestionsforreducingthisburdento:Chief,InformationPolicy .h)2 Branch<'<'=' .h)2 ='(2136)U.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency,401MSt.SW,Washington,D.C.20503,marked,"Attention:DeskOfficerfortheEPA."Informationonthefollowingelementswouldbeparticularlyuseful:0  (1)Capitalcostassociatedwithpreapplicationmonitoringorcontractservicesprocuredforpreapplicationmonitoring. (#(# 0  (2)Thepercentageofpermitsinwhichcontractservicesareprocuredandthedistributionbypermitapplicationelementofthehourlyburdenfurnishedviacontractservices. (#(# ThefinalrulewillrespondtoanyOMBorpubliccommentsontheinformationcollectionrequirementscontainedinthisproposal.  H  H XXd*-ndd((<%n=(#(#,T(, ,e,e,,+  6, H 86TABLE6-4 8 SUMMARYOFRECORDKEEPINGANDREPORTINGBURDEǸESTIMATESTOINDUSTRYRESPONDENTSANDSTATEAND̀LOCALAGENCIES H>&H" 8  ,H 'l$ ' -#l$ -PartD(NonattainmentNSR)MajorSourcePermits 3)  3 3PartC(PSD)MajorSOurcePermits 3), 3 3MinorSource l$ Action 3)3 3TOTALS E;#l$3 , ,E -# p -No.ofSources(a) TJ p p@266p@T266 uk9 p3 p@266 p@ b@144b@u144 wm9 p3 b@144 b@ @20000P@w20,000 PF; p3P @20000 @ P I? p , ,II.IndustryRespondentBurden 0& L 0 ' L ' ' L ' ?5 L , ,? -#p (  -Hours/Source TJp (  {@445{@T445 uk9p ( !3 {@445 {@ 8@7118@u711 si9p ( "3 8@711 8@   @8 @s8 LB7p ( #3   @8  @ L ?5p ( $ , ,? -#L  % -TotalHours QGL  &  @@P @Q118,370 oe6L  '3P  @@  @  @@P@o102,384 oe6L  (3P  @@ @  @@PAo160,000 oe6L  )3P  @@ A  0PH=Ao380,754 cYAL  *3P  0 , H=A ,c -#( + -WageRate,$/hour(b) SI( ,  F@45PF@S$45 si8( -3P  F@45 F@  F@45PF@s$45 si8( .3P  F@45 F@  F@45PF@s$45 si8( /3P  F@45 F@  F@45PF@s$45 e[C( 03P  F@45 , F@ ,e -# 1 -TotalCosts QG 2  @@PQTAQ$5,326,650 oe6 33P  @@ QTA  @@PLQAo$4,607,280 oe6 43P  @@ LQA  @@P@w[Ao$7,200,000 oe6 53P  @@ @w[A  @@PWpAo$17,133,930 cYA 63P  @@ , WpA ,c -# 7 -1995BaselineCost -# 8 - ' 9 ' ' : ' SI ; {A29073000P{AS$29,073,000 kaI <3P {A29073000 , {A ,k 1't = 1Costor(Savings)fromBaseline 0&t > 0 't ? ' KAt @  @@PfK($11,939,070) mcAt A3P  @@ , f ,mII.StateandLocalAgencyBurden 0&PB 0 'PC ' 'PD ' ?5PE , ,? -#t,F -No.ofAgencies SIt,G  I@50I@S50 si8t,H3  I@50 I@  N@60N@s60 si8t,I3  N@60 N@  @U@85@U@s85 MC8t,J3  @U@85 @U@ M ?5t,K , ,? -#PL -No.ofSources/Agency PM (c) QGN  @@GzG@Q5.3 oe6PO3  @@ GzG@  @@333333@o2.4 oe6PP3  @@ 333333@  @@iiiiiim@o235.3 KA6PQ3  @@ iiiiiim@ K ?5PR , ,? -#S -Hours/Source TJT [@110[@T110 uk9U3 [@110 [@ q@272q@u272 tj9V3 q@272 q@  $@10$@t10 MC8W3  $@10 $@ M ?5X , ,? -#pY -TotalHours QGpZ  @@P@Q29,260 oe6p[3P  @@ @  @@P @o39,168 oe6p\3P  @@  @  @@PjAo200,000 oe6p]3P  @@ jA  0P0bAo268,428 cYAp^3P  0 , 0bA ,c -#L_ -WageRate,$/hour(b) SIL`  A@34PA@S$34 si8La3P  A@34 A@  A@34PA@s$34 si8Lb3P  A@34 A@  A@34PA@s$34 si8Lc3P  A@34 A@  A@34PA@s$34 e[CLd3P  A@34 , A@ ,e -#p(e -TotalCosts QGp(f  @@P0\.AQ$994,840 oe6p(g3P  @@ 0\.A  @@PR4Ao$1,331,712 oe6p(h3P  @@ R4A  @@PYAo$6,800,000 oe6p(i3P  @@ YA  @@PShaAo$9,126,552 cYAp(j3P  @@ , ShaA ,c -#Lk -1995BaselineCost -#Ll - 'Lm ' 'Ln ' SILo vfA11776000PvfAS$11,776,000 kaILp3P vfA11776000 , vfA ,k 1'(q 1Costor(Savings)fromBaseline 0&(r 0 '(s ' KA(t  @@P6DK($2,649,448) mcA(u3P  @@ , 6D ,mIII.FederalBurden 0&v 0 'w ' 'x ' 'y ' ?5z , ,? -#{ -No.ofSources(d) TJ| p@266p@T266 uk9}3 p@266 p@ b@144b@u144 vl9~3 b@144 b@ @@2000P@@v2,000 OE:3P @@2000 @@ O ?5 , ,? -#t -Hours/Source SIt  .@15.@S15 si8t3  .@15 .@  .@15.@s15 rh8t3  .@15 .@  @2@r2 LB7t3  @2 @ L ?5t , ,? -#P -TotalHours QGP  @@P,@Q3,990 oe6P3P  @@ ,@  @@P@o2,160 oe6P3P  @@ @  @@P@@o4,000 oe6P3P  @@ @@  0P@o10,150 cYAP3P  0 , @ ,c -#t, -WageRate,$/hour(b) SIt,  A@34A@S34 si8t,3  A@34 A@  A@34A@s34 si8t,3  A@34 A@  A@34A@s34 si8t,3  A@34 A@  A@34A@s34 e[Ct,3  A@34 , A@ ,e -#P -TotalCosts QGP  @@P`AQ$135,660 oe6P3P  @@ `A  @@P@o$73,440 oe6P3P  @@ @  @@PAo$136,000 oe6P3P  @@ A  @@P0Ao$345,100 cYAP3P  @@ , 0A ,c -#, -1995BaselineCost -#, - ', ' ', ' QG, 8"A597000P8"AQ$597,000 i_G,3P 8"A597000 , 8"A ,i 1'  1Costor(Savings)fromBaseline 0&  0 '  ' KA   @@PK($251,900) mcA 3P  @@ ,  ,mIV.TotalProgramCost 6,  P6$6,457,150 3) 3P P3$6,012,432 3) 3P P3$14,136,000 YO 3P @@@P_yAY$26,605,582 kaI 3P @@@ , _yA ,k 1'!x 1TotalProgramCostor(Savings)fromBaseline \R!x @@@P@LNl\($14,840,418) ukI!x3P @@@ , @LNl ,u(a)Includesbothmajornewandmodifiedstationarysources. RH&"T ,  ,R(b)WagerateisbasedontheFederalwagerateattheGrade11,Step3level x#0  forthe1994payschedule.Thewagerateincludesdirectpersonnelandoverheadcosts. RH&$! ,  ,R(c)Numberofsourcepermitsprocessedbyeachagencyequalsthetotalnumber %l" ofsourcesdividedbythetotalnumberofagenciesundereachcolumn6,*d&# ,   6  $'# XdX   @%APPENDIXA H @LLINFORMATIONREQUIREMENTS   *PnSd dT( ee-n(#(#,dd , dd +  $m H $X&XXXd{XX&@VV&TABLEA1 d   RESPONDENTDATAANDINFORMATIONREQUIREMENTSFOR @O  @$  @s PREPARINGPARTC(PSD)CONSTRUCTIONPERMITS*Wj 8n'm 8Requirements   >n-Pn >RegulationReferenceasProposed .$Pn .RegistrationofpermitapplicationonEPANotificationBoard %` %40CFR51.166(n)(4) %` %Descriptionofthenature,location,designcapacity,andtypicaloperatingschedule % |  %40CFR51.166(n)(2)(i) %   %Detailedscheduleforconstruction %   %40CFR51.166(n)(2)(ii) %   %Descriptionofcontinuousemissionreductionsystem,emissionestimates,andotherinformationneededtodeterminethatBACTisused l %  %{{40CFR51.166(n)(2)(iii)#{{gn# %t ,  %AirQualityimpact,meteorological,andtopographicaldata %T  %40CFR51.166(n)(3)(i) %T  %Natureandextentof,andairqualityimpactsofgeneralcommercial,residential,industrial,andothergrowthinareaofsource l %4 %40CFR51.166(n)(3)(i)40CFR51.166(o)(2) %p( %UseofairqualitymodelstodemonstratecompliancewithNAAQSandincrement %P %40CFR51.166(k)&(l) %D %InformationnecessarytodetermineimpactonAQRVsinFederalClassIareas %l$ %40CFR51.166(p)(2)(i) %` %Airqualitymonitoringdata %| %40CFR51.166(m) %|  %AnalysisofImpairmenttovisibility,soils,andvegetation %! %40CFR51.166(o)(1) %" %Incaseofmodification,documentationofderivationofnetemissionsincrease %8$ %40CFR51.166(b)(3)(i) %t,% %Documentationforbasisofqualifyingforapollutioncontrolorpollutionpreventionprojectexclusion %T ' %40CFR51.166(b)(2)(iii)(H) %H( %Writtennoticeofproposedrelocationofportablesource | %d)  %40CFR51.166(i)(4)(iii)(d)&d*   &@*   X* H4(x(wL 9 Z G4XH*`kl dddd dd PnS(#(#`,ndd , dd +  3m" H x3@@)TABLEA2@@-@@ STATEDATAANDINFORMATIONREQUIREMENTSFORPSDPERMITS VnE-H" x0  m ZxVRequirement ;n*ln ;  RegulationReferenceasProposed LB*l x Z n JxLEarlyFLMnotificationandopportunitytoparticipateinmeetings(forsourceswithin100kmofClassIarea)  | 40CFR51.166(p)(2) 6, x J ax6SubmissionofallpermitapplicationstoEPA     40CFR51.166(q)(4)(iv)40CFR51.161(d) 6, |  x a ax6RegistrationofsummaryinformationonNSRBBS     40CFR51.166(n)(4) 6,   x a Jx6SubmissiontoFLMofpermitapplicationsforsourceswithin100kmofClassIareaorifotherwiserequestedbyFLM    40CFR51.166(p)(4) (<  x J x(Makepreliminarydeterminationwhetherconstructionpermitshouldbeissuedformajorsourceorminorsourceormodificationdueto cleanunittestorpollutioncontrolprojectexclusion.  |  40CFR51.166(i)(p)40CFR51.166(q)(4)(i) 1'  x 3x1Submissionofnoticeofapplication,preliminarydetermination,degreeofincrementconsumption,andopportunityforpubliccomment  @ 40CFR51.166(q)(4)(ii)&(iii) ( x 3 x(ConductpublichearingsonMajorNSRpermits  | 40CFR51.166(q)(4)(v) 1'| x ax1SubmissionofwrittenrequesttoexemptsourcesfromreviewunderFederalregulationswhen  | 40CFR52.21(i)(4)(vi) 6, x a ax6Makefindingsregardinginnovativecontroltechnologyapplicationsandissueappropriatepermit.  |  40CFR51.166(s) =n,! x a qx=ProvideforappropriatepubliccommentforminorNSRpermitsthathavebeenissuedinlieuofamajorNSRpermitdueto cleanunittestorpollutioncontrolprojectexclusion 2n!@$n 240CFR51.1611'%% x q n 1  \% *fqsd dndd dd kl(#(#f,`` +  ( H 0(TABLEA3. x0 RESPONDENTDATAANDINFORMATIONREQUIREMENTSFORPREPARINGPARTD(NONATTAINMENTNSR)CONSTRUCTIONPERMITS-#!" 00  -*Otu dd`` qs(#(#O,dd, dd+  3mn"  3Requirements ;mn*`mn ;RegulationReferenceasProposed LB*T"   mn JxLDocumentationthatLAERisbeingapplied  d 40CFR51.165(a)(2)(ii) 6,d x J 3x6DocumentationthatallsourcesownedoroperatedbysamepersonintheparticularStateareincompliancewithallStateandFederalRegulationsapplicableinthatState  p (  40CFR51.165(a)(6)(ii)(D) 6, d  x 3 Jx6DocumentationdemonstratingthelegitmacyofproposedoffsetsandthatsufficientemissionsreductionsareoccurringtoensureRFP  p (  40CFR51.165(a)(2)(i)40CFR51.165(a)(3)(i) 6,p (  x J x6Documentationthatbenefitsofproposedsourcesignificantlyoutweightheenvironmentalandsocialcostsimposedasaresultofitslocation,construction,ormodification  4  40CFR51.165(a)(2)(i) ?5d  x  Jx?Descriptionofthelocation,designconstruction,andoperationofbuilding,structure,facility,orinstallation  4 40CFR51.165(a)(6)(ii) 6,p( x J Jx6Descriptionofthenatureandamountsofemissionstobeemittedandincaseofamodificationthederivationofthenetemissionsincrease  4 40CFR.165(a)(6)(ii)&(iii)40CFR.165(a)(1)(v)&(vi) 6,4 x J Jx6Descriptionoftheairqualitydataanddispersionorotherairqualitymodelingused  4 40CFR51.160(f) p( x J Documentationforbasisofqualifyingforapollutioncontrolorpollutionpreventionprojectexclusion   ! 40CFR51.165(a)(1)(v)(C) 2n! \" ,x2SufficientinformationtoensureattainmentandmaintenanceofNAAQS 2n!D#n 240CFR51.160(c)(e)40CFR51.16140CFR51.16240CFR51.1631'%' x , n 1  d' *`^_ d ddd ddtu(#(#`,dd ,dd +  3m" H x3@@)v { TABLEA4@@- x @@STATEDATAANDINFORMATIONREQUIREMENTSFORNONATTAINMENTREGULATIONS VnE-|4" x0  m ZxVRequirement ;n*Tn ;RegulationReference  asProposed LB*T" x Z n axLSubmissionofallpermitapplicationstoEPA   40CFR51.161(d) 6, x a ax6RegistrationofsummaryinformationonNSRBBS     40CFR51.165(a)(6) (   x a x(Makepreliminarydeterminationwhetherconstructionpermitshouldbeissuedformajorsourceorminorsourceormodificationdueto cleanunittestorpollutioncontrolprojectexclusion.  @  40CFR51.165(a)(1)(15) 1' H x 3x1Submissionofnoticeofapplication,preliminarydetermination,supportinganalysesanddocumentation,andopportunityforpubliccomment    40CFR51.165(a)(7)(iii) (  x 3 x(ConductpublichearingsonMajorNSRpermits    40CFR51.165(a)(7)40CFR51.161 1'X  x ax1Makefindingsregardinginnovativecontroltechnologyapplicationsandissueappropriatepermit.  x0 40CFR51.165(a)(8) +! x a x+ReportTechnologyDeterminationstotheRACT/BACT/LAERClearinghouse %P %40CFR51.165(a)(16) En4X x  qxEProvideforappropriatepubliccommentforminorNSRpermitsthathavebeenissuedinlieuofamajorNSRpermitdueto cleanunittestorpollutioncontrolprojectexclusion 2n!P#n 240CFR51.1611'%@$ x q n 1