UNITED STATES
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
BEFORE THE ADMINISTRATOR
In the Matter of
State of Illinois, Docket No. CAA-001-1995
Respondent
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT
AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
This matter was initiated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's ("EPA") filing an
administrative complaint against the State of Illinois on November 15, 1994. Thereafter, the parties filed
various pleadings and this case advanced toward a hearing date of January 22, 1997.
By order dated January 9, 1997, the January 22 hearing was canceled and the parties were directed
to file an executed Consent Agreement and Consent Order ("CACO") no later than March 10, 1997. The
January 9 order was issued following a conference call between the parties and the undersigned during
which the parties represented that the matter had been settled-in-principle. The parties also stated that as
part of the settlement procedure EPA would move to amend the complaint.
On March 7, 1997, EPA filed with the court a Motion To Amend The Complaint Instanter.
Paragraph 5 of the motion reads: "In contemplation of all reasonably expected delays associated with the
delivery, review and execution of the CACO by necessary signatories, Complainant believes that the fully
executed CACO will be filed well within four (4)weeks of the granting of this Motion."
The timing of EPA's motion to amend the complaint, particularly the Agency's granting itself an
additional four weeks to file an executed CACO, indicates a complete disregard for this court's order of
January 9, 1997. There is nothing ambiguous about the January 9 order. It directed EPA to file an
executed CACO by a date certain. EPA neither filed the CACO, nor sought an extension of time for
filing. Accordingly, EPA is in noncompliance.
For these reasons, EPA's Motion To Amend The Complaint Instanter is Denied. Furthermore,
EPA is directed to Show Cause no later than March 21, 1997, as to why this matter should not be
dismissed for failure to comply with the court's order of January 9, 1997. In that regard, counsel for EPA
is advised that the filing of a motion to extend the time for the submission of an executed CACO will not
be considered an appropriate response to the Show Cause order.
Carl C. Charneski
Administrative Law Judge
Issued: March 14, 1997
Washington, D.C.
IN THE MATTER OF STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent
Docket No. CAA-001-1995
Certificate of Service
I certify that the foregoing ORDER DENYING MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT AND
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE, dated March 14, 1997, was sent this day in the following manner to the
below addressees.
Original by Regular Mail to:
Ms. Sonja Brooks
Regional Hearing Clerk
U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 5
77 West Jackson Boulevard
Chicago, IL 60604-3590
Copy by Facsimile and Regular Mail to:
Attorney for Complainant:
Timothy J. Chapman, Esquire
Assistant Regional Counsel
U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 5 (C-29A)
77 West Jackson Boulevard
Chicago, IL 60604-3590
Attorney for Respondent:
Rosemarie Cazeau, Esquire
Senior Assistant Attorney General
Environmental Control Bureau
Office of the Illinois Attorney
General
100 West Randolph Street
llth Floor
Chicago, IL 60601
Marion Walzel
Legal Staff Assistant
Dated: March 14, 1997
![[logo] US EPA](http://www.epa.gov/epafiles/images/logo_epaseal.gif)