Jump to main content.


The Relationships Between NOx, NOy and Ozone

Note: EPA no longer updates this information, but it may be useful as a reference or resource.


Introduction
Monitoring Issues
Definitions
Analyses Using NOx, NOy, and Ozone Data
Summary of Correlation Methods
Indicator Methods
Observational-based Modeling: MAPPER/SPA
What is MAPPER?
Smog Production Algorithms
Modifications by Blanchard et al.
Other Techniques
Summary
References

[Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of NOx] [Previous Section] [Next Section]





INTRODUCTION

  • Emission control strategies are based on assessments of whether an area is "VOC-limited" or "NOx-limited."
  • No single analysis should form the basis for these decisions. Rather, several analyses, plus modeling, should provide concurrent evidence.
  • This section explores analytical techniques which use NOx, NOy, ozone, and other species data.

 

[Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of NOx] [Previous Section] [Next Section]





MONITORING ISSUES

  • Most NOx instruments are biased high, due to PAN and HNO3 interferences.
  • Urban to rural gradients are not characterized by current networks; heavy urban emphasis.
  • Micro-siting issues; large influence of fresh NOx emissions?

  [Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of NOx] [Previous Section] [Next Section]





  DEFINITIONS

E = Extent of reaction
HCHO = Formaldehyde
H2O2 = Hydrogen peroxide
HNO3 = Nitric acid
NMHC = Non-methane hydrocarbons
NMOC = Non-methane organic compounds (NMHC+carbonyl compounds)
NOx = NO + NO2 + poorly defined fraction of other NOy species (given conventional analyzers)
NOy = NOx + HNO3 + organic nitrates + inorganic nitrates = NOx + NOz
NOz = Oxidation products of NOx = NOy ´ (1 - NOx/NOy)
ODM = Observation-driven Method
PAN = Peroxyacetylnitrate
Photochemical Age = Fraction of initial NOx emissions that have been photooxidized = products/total = NOz/NOy
=1 - NOx/NOy
SP = Smog produced
SPA = Smog production algorithm
UAM = Urban Airshed Model
VOC = Volatile organic compounds

[Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of NOx] [Previous Section] [Next Section]





ANALYSES USING NOX, NOY,
AND OZONE DATA

Examine patterns of ozone, NO, NOx, and NOy data using time series, scatter plots, and correlations:

  • The difference between NOy and NOx at a site may vary over the course of the day.
  • Positive correlations have been observed between ozone and NOy or NOz under some conditions.
  • Ozone production efficiency may be examined with plots of ozone and photochemical age.

[Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of NOx] [Previous Section] [Next Section]





Figure 1

Average NOx, NOy Concentrations by Hour

[Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of NOx] [Previous Section] [Next Section]





SUMMARY OF CORRELATION METHODS

 Ozone with NOy

  • Good correlation if NOx-limited
  • Poor correlation if VOC-limited

Ozone with NOz

  • If slope > about 8, NOx-limited
  • If slope < about 5, VOC-limited

[Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of NOx] [Previous Section] [Next Section]





Figure 2

Relationship of NOx, NOy and NOz to Ozone Formation - Figure #4

[Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of NOx] [Previous Section] [Next Section]





Figure 3

Relationship of NOx, NOy and NOz to Ozone Formation - Figure #5

[Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of NOx] [Previous Section] [Next Section]





Figure 4

AirMass PhotoChemical Age

[Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of NOx] [Previous Section] [Next Section]





Figure 5

Air Mass PhotoChemical Age - (Comparison)

[Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of NOx] [Previous Section] [Next Section]





INDICATOR METHODS

 Threshold values of afternoon concentrations or ratios:

 
Indicator

 Threshold for NOx-Limitation

 
Reference

  NOy

 < 10 to 25 ppb

 Milford et al., 1994

 NOz

 < 5 to 20 ppb

 Milford et al., 1994

 O3/NOy

 > 5 to 10

 Sillman, 1995; Jacob et al., 1995

 O3/NOz

 > 6 to 11

 Sillman, 1995; Jacob et al., 1995

 (O3 - 40 ppb)/NOy

 > 4

 Sillman, 1995; Jacob et al., 1995

 HCHO/NOy

 > 0.2 to 0.4

 Sillman, 1995; Jacob et al., 1995

 H2O2/HNO3

 >0.3 to 0.5

 Sillman, 1995; Jacob et al., 1995

 H2O2/NOy

 > 0.2 to 0.4

 Sillman, 1995; Jacob et al., 1995

 H2O2/NOz

 > 0.2

 Sillman, 1995; Jacob et al., 1995

 Morning NMOC/NOx

 > 10 to 15

 National Research Council (1991)

 Afternoon NMOC/NOx

 > 15 to 20

 National Research Council (1991)

 

[Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of NOx] [Previous Section] [Next Section]





Observational-based Modeling: MAPPER/SPA

Objectives:

  • Identifying spatial and temporal characteristics of VOC-limited and NOx-limited conditions.
  • Corroborating emission-based model results.
  • Assisting monitoring network design.

 

Topics:

  • What is MAPPER?
  • Review of the smog production algorithm (SPA).
  • MAPPER/model bi-directional control strategy evaluation.
  • Example application.

[Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of NOx] [Previous Section] [Next Section]





What is MAPPER?

  • Software (PC-Windows) that estimates "relative" degree of NOx- and VOC-limiting conditions, based on hourly ozone and NOx (or NOy) measurements.
  • Original motivation to develop observational technique more robust than VOC/NOx ratios.
  • Developed by ENVAIR, originally funded by EPA and subsequently by API (Blanchard et al., 1993a, 1993b, 1994a, 1994b).

[Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of NOx] [Previous Section] [Next Section]



 

 SMOG PRODUCTION ALGORITHMS

  • The algorithm was developed by Graham Johnson; derived empirically from smog chamber data.
  • The purpose is to determine ozone formation sensitivity to changes in NOx concentrations.
  • Ozone, NO, and NOx (or NOy) concentrations are used to compute Smog Produced and Extent of Reaction:

    SP(t) = O3(t) - O3(0) + NO(0) - NO(t)
    smog = ozone produced + oxidized NO

    SPmax = b (NOx(i))
    Maximum smog produced µ NOx inputs

    E = SP(t) / SPmax
    As E ® 1, enter NOx-limited regime.
    As E > 0.7, enter transition.
    As E ® 0, enter VOC-limited regime.

  • SP responds linearly to cumulative light flux; consequently accounting for the NO-ozone co-dependence.
  • SPA is consistent with fundamental atmospheric chemistry processes: dSP/dt µ k RO2 [NO]

[Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of NOx] [Previous Section] [Next Section]





Figure 6

SP vs. Cumulative Light Flux

[Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of NOx] [Previous Section] [Next Section]




MODIFICATIONS BY BLANCHARD et al.

 

  • Adapted/fitted SPA to U.S. smog chamber data and box model chemical mechanism simulations by Blanchard et al. (1993a, 1993b, 1994a, 1994b).
  • Revised SPA:

     SPmax = b (NOx(i))2/3

    SP(t) = O3(t) + DO3(t) - O3(0) + NO(0) - NO(t)

    NOx(0) (emitted NOx) = NOy(t) + DNOy(t)
    DO3; DNOy = equivalent concentration due to deposition loss
    E = SP(t)/SPmax = f(measured O3, NO, NOy, or NOx*)

    * equivalent form based on NOx

[Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of NOx] [Previous Section] [Next Section]





Figure 7

SP Max vs. NOxO

SPmax versus initial NOx concentration for UNC, SAPRC, and CSIRO chamber experiments that utilized VOC mixtures and that reached SPmax (Blanchard et al., 1994a). The regression was carried out as log (SPmax) versus log [NOx(0)] and the regression parameters were converted back to concentration units. The solid line is the regression line, as converted to concentration units. The dashed lines are the 95 percent confidence intevals for the regression.

[Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of NOx] [Previous Section] [Next Section]





Figure 8

SP Max vs. NOxO Simulations(OZIPR with CBM-IV)

SPmax versus initial NOx computed using a box model and carbon bond mechanism (CBM-4, Gery et al., 1989) (Blanchard et al., 1994a). The simulation conditions included: urban average NMOC composition, initial NMOC of 2 to 5 ppmC, initial NOx of 1 to 30 ppb, initial NO/NOx of 0.95, Los Angeles latitude, June 21, 0600 PST, 1000 m mixing height, 298 K, no deposition.

[Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of NOx] [Previous Section] [Next Section]





Figure 9

Smog Production Algorithm Mapper

Example of smog prouction algorithm MAPPER output from 1990 San Joaquin Valley Air Quality Study data collected on August 6, 1990 (Blanchard, 1997)

[Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of NOx] [Previous Section] [Next Section]





Figure 10

Reaction in SARMAP (Base Case)

[Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of NOx] [Previous Section] [Next Section]



Figure 11

Reaction in SARMAP (50% NOx Reductions)

[Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of NOx] [Previous Section] [Next Section]





OTHER TECHNIQUES

  • Observational-based model developed by Cardelino and Chameides (1995).
  • Requires hourly speciated hydrocarbon, NO, CO, and ozone concentrations as well as temperature, relative humidity, and mixing height.

[Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of NOx] [Previous Section] [Next Section]



 

SUMMARY

  • These analyses provide information which assist in the decisions on which species are the most important to ozone formation and begin to address the question of NOx versus hydrocarbon emission controls.

Analysis

 Tools

 Data Required

NOx, NOy, ozone relationships Statistics Spreadsheets Hourly NOx, NOy, and ozone concentrations
Other species and ozone relationships Statistics Spreadsheets Hourly NOy, NOz, PAN, HNO3, H202, HCHO, and ozone concentrations
Smog Production Algorithm MAPPER Hourly ozone, NOx (and/or NOy), and NO concentrations
Other Models Observational-based Model Hourly ozone, NOx, NMHC, meteorological data, CO, and NO concentrations

  [Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of NOx] [Previous Section] [Next Section]





 NOX, NOY, AND OZONE REFERENCES

Aneja V.P. and Das M. (1994) Correlation of ozone and meteorology with hydrogen peroxide in urban and rural regions of North Carolina. J. Appl. Meteorol. 34, 1890-1897.

Blanchard C.L. (1997) Personal communication.

Blanchard C.L., Roth P.M., and Jeffries H.E. (1993a) Continuing development of a methodology for assessing preferences for reductions in VOC versus NOx emissions in nonattainment areas. Paper presented at the Air & Waste Management Association's Specialty Conference on Regional Photochemical Measurement and Modeling Studies, San Diego, CA, November 8-12.

Blanchard C.L., Roth P.M., and Jeffries H.E. (1993b) Spatial mapping of preferred strategies for reducing ambient ozone concentrations nationwide. Paper no. 93-TA-37A.04 presented at the Air & Waste Management Association's 86th Annual Meeting & Exhibition, Denver, CO, June 13-18.

Blanchard C.L., Lurmann F.W., Korc M.E., and Roth P.M. (1994a) The use of ambient data to corroborate analyses of ozone control strategies. Final report prepared for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC by Sonoma Technology, Inc., Santa Rosa, CA and Envair, San Anselmo, CA, STI-94030-1433-FR, Contract No. 68D30020, December.

Blanchard C.L., Roberts P.T., Chinkin L.R., and Roth P.M. (1994b) Application of smog production (sp) algorithms to the Coastal Oxidant Assessment for Southeast Texas (COAST) data. Final report prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC by Envair, Albany, CA and Sonoma Technology, Inc., Santa Rosa, CA, STI-94080-1454-FR, Work Assignment 8-94, EPA Contract No. 68D30020, December.

Bottenheim J.W. and Sirois A. (1996) Long-term daily mean mixing ratios of O3, PAN, HNO3, and particle nitrate at a rural location in eastern Canada: relationships and implied ozone production efficiency. J. Geophys. Res. 191, 4189-4204.

Cardelino C.A. and Chameides W.L. (1995) An observation-based model for analyzing ozone precursor relationships in the urban atmosphere. J. Air & Waste Manag. Assoc. 45, 161-180.

Chang T.Y. and Suzio M.J. (1995) Assessing ozone-precursor relationships based on a smog production model and ambient data. J. Air & Waste Manag. Assoc. 45, 20-28.

Gery M.W., Whitten G.Z., Killus J.P., and Dodge M.C. (1989) A photochemical kinetics mechanism for urban and regional scale computer modeling. J. Geophys. Res. 94, 925-12.

Hartsell B.E., Aneja V.P., and Lonneman W.A. (1994) Relationships between peroxyacetyl nitrate, O3, and NOy at the rural southern oxidants study site in central Piedmont, North Carolina, site SONIA. J. Geophys. Res. 99, 21033-21041.

Hastie D.R., Shepson P.B., Reid N., Roussel P.B., and Melo O.T. (1996) Summertime NOx, NOy, and ozone at a site in rural Ontario. Atmos. Environ. 30, 2157-2165.

Jacob D.J., Horowitz L.W., Munger J.W., Heikes B.G., Dickerson R.R., Artz R.S., and Keene W.C. (1995) Seasonal transition from NOx to hydrocarbon-limited conditions for ozone production over the eastern United States in September. J. Geophys. Res. 100, 9315-9324.

 Johnson G.M. (1984) A simple model for predicting the ozone concentration of ambient air. In Proceedings from the 8th International Clean Air Conference, Melbourne, Australia, May 2, pp. 715-731.

Johnson G.M. and Azzi M. (1992) Notes on the derivation: the integrated empirical rate model (V2.2). Report prepared by CSIRO Division of Coal and Energy Technology, North Ryde, NSW, Australia.

Johnson G.M. and Quigley S.M. (1989) A universal monitor for photochemical smog. Paper No. 89-29.8 presented at the 82nd Air & Waste Management Association Annual Meeting and Exhibition, Anaheim, CA, June 25-30.

Kelly T.J., Ward G.F., and Satola J. (1995) A comparison of NOy and conventional "NOx" measurements at a rural site in Pennsylvania. Paper presented at the Air & Waste Management Association and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Measurement of Toxic and Related Air Pollutants Conference, Research Triangle Park, NC, May 16-19.

Koike M., Kondo Y., Kawakami S., Singh H.B., and Ziereis H. (1996) Ratios of reactive nitrogen species over the Pacific during PEM-West A. J. Geophys. Res. 101, 1829-1851.

Korc M.E., Jones C.M., Chinkin L.R., Main H.H., Roberts P.T., and Blanchard C. (1995) Use of PAMS data to evaluate the Texas coast emission inventory. Final report prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC by Sonoma Technology, Inc., Santa Rosa, CA, Work assignment 2-95, EPA Contract No. 68D30020, STI-94520-1558-FR, December.

Milford J.B., Gao D., Sillman S., Blossey P., and Russell A.G. (1994) Total reactive nitrogen (NOy) as an indicator of the sensitivity of ozone to reductions in hydrocarbon and NOx emissions. J. Geophys. Res. 99, 3533-3542.

National Research Council (1991) Rethinking the Ozone Problem in Urban and Regional Air Pollution. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.

Olszyna K.J., Bailey E.M., Simonaitis R., and Meagher J.F. (1994) O3 and NOy relationships at a rural site. J. Geophys. Res. 99, 14557-14563.

Sillman S. (1995) The use of NOy, H2O2, and HNO3 as indicators for ozone-NOx-hydrocarbon sensitivity in urban locations. J. Geophys. Res. 100, 14175-14188.

Singh H.B. et al. (1996) Reactive nitrogen and ozone over the western Pacific: distribution, partitioning, and sources. J. Geophys. Res. 101, 1793-1808.

Trainer M., Parrish D.D., Buhr M.P., Norton R.B., Fehsenfeld F.C., Anlauf K.G., Bottenheim J.W., Tang Y.Z., Wiebe H.A., Roberts J.M., Tanner R.L., Newman L., Bowersox V.C., Meagher J.F., Olszyna K.J., Rodgers M.O., Wang T., Berresheim H., Demerjian K.L., and Roychowdhury U.K. (1993) Correlation of ozone with NOy in photochemically aged air. J. Geophys. Res. 98, 2917-2925.

[Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of NOx] [Previous Section] [Next Section]


Local Navigation


Jump to main content.