Jump to main content.


Assessing the Ozone Formation Potential

Note: EPA no longer updates this information, but it may be useful as a reference or resource.


Introduction
Assessment Techniques and Example Analyses

NMOC/NOx and NMOC/NOyRatios
- Examples of NMOC_NOx_analyses
- Analyses Along Transport Path

Reactivity of Identified Hydrocarbons
- Carters' 1994_Maxiumum Incremental Reaction...
- Examples of Reactivity Assessment
- Ten Most Abundant Hydrocarbon Species

Relative Age of Hydrocarbon Mixture
- Analysis Examples
- Assessing the Age of an Air Mass

Summary
References


   [Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of Assessing Ozone Formation] [Previous Section] [Next Section]





INTRODUCTION

  • Photochemical interaction of VOC and NOx form ozone.
  • Each VOC reacts at a different rate and with different reaction mechanisms. Therefore, VOCs can differ significantly in their influence on ozone formation.
  • Recently, control strategies have encouraged the use of a "less-reactive" VOC to achieve ozone reductions.
  • Emission control strategies are developed based on an assessment of whether or not an area is "VOC-limited" or NOx-limited".
  • No single analysis should form the basis for decisions on control strategies; rather, several analyses should be performed to form a consensus.

  

 
Assessing the reactivity, or ozone formation potential, of ambient and emission inventory-derived VOCs is important.

   [Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of Assessing Ozone Formation] [Previous Section] [Next Section]


OZONE FORMATION POTENTIAL ASSESSMENT TECHNIQUES

  • NMOC/NOx and NMOC/NOy ratios
  • Reactivity of identified hydrocarbons
  • Relative age of hydrocarbon mixture
  • NOy comparison to NOx
  • Observational-based modeling
  • Biogenic contribution to NMHC
  • Other methods: ozone and NOy, other organic species relationships

     [Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of Assessing Ozone Formation] [Previous Section] [Next Section]





NMOC/NOx AND NMOC/NOy RATIOS 

The ratio of NMOC to NOx or NOy in the morning is an important parameter for photochemical systems. The ratio characterizes the efficiency of ozone formation in NMOC-NOx-air mixtures. 

  • At low ratios (< 5 ppbC/ppb), ozone formation is slow and inefficient (hydrocarbon-limited). Decreasing NOx levels may result in increased ozone formation.
  • At high ratios (> 15 to 20 ppbC/ppb), ozone formation is limited by availability of NOx rather than NMOC (NOx-limited).
  • Ratios between 5 and 15 are considered transitional, and both NOx and NMOC controls may be effective.


If NOx-limited, generally NOx controls would be effective in decreasing ozone (and VOC controls would not be effective). If VOC-limited, VOC controls would be effective in decreasing ozone (and NOx controls would not.)

  • Ratios may change during transport of air parcels - consider the effects of controls on both nearby areas and areas far downwind.
  • When pollutant transport is a significant or dominant factor in high ambient concentrations at a site, precursor concentrations at upwind locations along the transport path need to be determined.
  • Identify ozone contributions from local precursor emissions, transported ozone formed in upwind locations, in-situ ozone production from transported upwind precursors.
  • What comprises NMOC and NOx in NMOC:NOx
    • Methane or not?
    • Biogenics (e.g., isoprene, terpenes)?
    • Carbonyl compounds?
    • Unidentified hydrocarbon mass?
    • Adjusted NOx? NOy? Only NOx or NOy above a cut-off limit?
    • Time standard for the ratio - standard or local?
    • Time of day of the ratio?
    • Subtract out the background concentrations?

     [Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of Assessing Ozone Formation] [Previous Section] [Next Section]





EXAMPLES OF NMOC/NOx ANALYSES 

  • Frequency distributions: all ratios, by time of day
  • Scatter plots of NMOC and NOx
  • Spatial and temporal variations in ratios
  • Analysis of the ratio as a function of time of day or along a trajectory
  • Handling instrument detection limit and background concentrations

     [Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of Assessing Ozone Formation] [Previous Section] [Next Section]





Figure 1.

Frequency of NMOC / NOx Ratios (All Surface Data)

Frequency of LMOS surface NMOC/NOx ratios in (a) all data and (b) 0700-0900 CDT data. Only ratios with NOx concentrations > 8 ppb were included (Main and Roberts, 1993). NMOC = NMHC + formaldehyde and acetaldehyde.

   [Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of Assessing Ozone Formation] [Previous Section] [Next Section]





Figure 2.

NMOC and NOx Concentrations

   [Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of Assessing Ozone Formation] [Previous Section] [Next Section]





Figure 3.

Mean Ratios by Surface Site

   [Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of Assessing Ozone Formation] [Previous Section] [Next Section]





ANALYSIS ALONG TRANSPORT PATH 

NMOC/NOx, and ozone and NOx concentrations, for selected NMOC samples collected on June 26, 1991. Samples were selected along an estimated time/distance path similar to an estimated trajectory for a polluted air parcel which might have arrived at the location of the maximum ozone concentration. The extent of reaction was about one (indicating NOx limitations) for those samples with * in the NMOC/NOx column. (Roberts et al., 1995b). 

Time of Day

 Location

 O3
(ppb)

 NOx
(ppb)

NMOC/
NOx

  Early morning  Aloft along boundary

 60-86

 3

14-28

 Early morning Chicago
Gary
Milwaukee

18
34
35

210
32
46

4
7
6

 Mid morning Zion
Mid-lake Boat

85
82

16
11

8
9

 Afternoon South-lake Boat
Aloft over South-lake Boat
Aloft over North-lake Boat
North-lake Boat
Sheboygan
Aloft over NEROE intersection
Aloft over Collins

129
125
106
148
134
121
99

6
9
11
20
14
6
2

  16*
 6
 6
 7
12
  13*
  33

 Late afternoon North-lake Boat
Aloft over North-lake Boat
Sheboygan

119
76
111

5
6
4

   9*
14
  17*

 NMOC = NMHC + formaldehyde and acetaldehyde

NMOC/NOx, and ozone and NOx concentrations, for all LMOS NMOC samples with ozone concentrations greater than 125 ppb. The mean NMOC/NOx ratio is 10 and the median ratio is 9. The extent of reaction was about one (indicating NOx limitations) for those samples with * in the NMOC/NOx column. (Roberts et al., 1995b) 

Date
(1991)

Time
(CDT)

Location

O3
(ppb)

NOx
(ppb)

NMOC/
NOx

  June 26

1300-1500

South-lake Boat

129

6

16*

 June 26

1300-1500

North-lake Boat

148

20

7

 June 26

1300-1500

Sheboygan

134

14

12

 June 28

1455-1458

Aloft over Mid-lake Boat

127

5

8

 July 17

1802-1803

Aloft over Tulip City

151

8

7

 July 18

1309-1311

Aloft over NEPTS intersection

135

18

7

 July 18

1300-1500

Mid-lake Boat

154

12

9

 July 18

1427-1431

Aloft over Mid-lake Boat

136

5

12

 July 18

1700-1900

Borculo

164

9

17

 July 18

1804-1805

Aloft over Tulip City

154

8

9

 NMOC = NMHC + formaldehyde and acetaldehyde

   [Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of Assessing Ozone Formation] [Previous Section] [Next Section]





REACTIVITY OF IDENTIFIED HYDROCARBONS

  • Incremental reactivity may be used to assess effect of changing emissions of a given VOC on ozone formation.
  • Incremental reactivity is the change in ozone caused by adding a small amount of test VOC to the emission in an episode, divided by the amount of test VOC added:

 g ozone/g C or mols ozone/mol C

  • MIR scale was developed by W.P.L. Carter and used in "low emission vehicles and clean fuels" regulations in California.
  • Most useful in a relative rather than absolute manner.
  • Uncertainty associated with MIR scale values and the notion that total reactivity equals the sum of individual species incremental reactivities is unverified.
  • MIR scale values for >C4 aldehydes not yet available.
  • Need low unidentified fraction of total NMOC to best assess the potential reactivity of a hydrocarbon mixture.

     [Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of Assessing Ozone Formation] [Previous Section] [Next Section]





CARTER’S 1994 MAXIMUM INCREMENTAL REACTIVITY VALUES FOR HYDROCARBON AND CARBONYL COMPOUNDS 

  Maximum Incremental Reactivity (MIR)a

Species Name

AIRS
No.

g Ozone/
g C

mol Ozone/
mol Cb

 Acetylene

43206

0.5

0.14

 Ethene

43203

7.4

2.16

 Ethane

43202

0.25

0.08

 Propene

43205

9.4

2.75

 Propane

43204

0.48

0.15

 i-Butane

43214

1.21

0.37

 1-Butene

43280

8.9

2.6

 n-Butane

43212

1.02

0.31

 t-2-Butene

43216

10

2.92

 c-2-Butene

43217

10

2.92

 3-methyl-1-butene

43282

6.2

1.81

 i-Pentane

43221

1.38

0.41

 1-Pentene

43224

6.2

1.81

 n-Pentane

43220

1.04

0.31

 Isoprene

43243

9.1

2.58

 t-2-pentene

43226

8.8

2.57

 c-2-pentene

43227

8.8

2.57

 2-methyl-2-butene

43228

6.4

1.87

 2,2-dimethylbutane

43244

0.82

0.25

 Cyclopentene

43283

7.7

2.19

 4-methyl-1-pentene

43234

3.0c

0.87

 Cyclopentane

43242

2.4

0.7

 2,3-dimethylbutane

43284

1.07

0.32

 2-methylpentane

43285

1.5

0.45

  3-methylpentane

43230

1.5

0.45

 2-methyl-1-pentene

43246

3.0c

0.87

 n-hexane

43231

0.98

0.29

 t-2-hexene

43289

6.7

1.96

 c-2-hexene

43290

6.7

1.96

 Methylcyclopentane

43262

2.8

0.82

 2,4-dimethylpentane

43247

1.5

0.45

 Benzene

45201

0.42

0.11

 Cyclohexane

43248

1.28

0.37

 2-methylhexane

43263

1.08

0.32

 2,3-dimethylpentane

43291

1.31

0.39

 3-methylhexane

43249

1.4

0.42

 2,2,4-trimethylpentane

43250

0.93

0.28

 n-Heptane

43232

0.81

0.24

 Methylcyclohexane

43261

1.8

0.53

 2,3,4-trimethylpentane

43252

1.6

0.48

 Toluene

45202

2.7

0.74

 2-methylheptane

43960

0.96

0.29

 3-methylheptane

43253

0.99

0.29

 n-Octane

43233

0.6

0.18

 Ethylbenzene

45203

2.7

0.75

  m&p-Xylenes

45109

7.4d

2.05

 styrene

45220

2.2

0.60

 n-nonane

43235

0.54

0.16

 Isopropylbenzene

45210

2.2

0.6

 n-Propylbenzene

45209

2.1

0.58

  1,3,5-trimethylbenzene

45207

10.1

2.81

 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene

45208

8.8

2.45

 1,2,3-trimethylbenzene

45225

8.9

2.6

 o-Xylene

45204

6.5

1.8

o-ethyltoluene

45211

5.3c

1.48

m-ethyltoluene

45212

5.3c

1.48

p-ethyltoluene

45213

5.3c

1.48

m-diethylbenzene

45218

4.8c

1.33

p-diethylbenzene

45219

4.8c

1.33

 n-Decane

43238

0.46

0.17

 n-Undecane

43954

0.42

0.12

 Formaldehyde

43502

7.2

4.5

Acetaldehyde

43503

5.5

2.52

Acetone

43551

0.56

0.23

 Carbon Monoxide

42101

0.054

0.032

 Methane

43201

0.015

0.005

Bold indicates reactivity > formaldehyde.

a Carter (1994). Note that the paper provides only units of g Ozone per g C.

b Calculated from g Ozone/g C values:

Where MWo3 = Molecular weight of Ozone (48 g/mol), MWvoc = molecular weight of the VOC, and #Cvoc is the number of carbons in the VOC. 

c Carter (1991). Note that the Carter (1994) reference did not include an updated value for this species.

 d Average of m-xylene and p-xylene values.

   [Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of Assessing Ozone Formation] [Previous Section] [Next Section]





Figure 4.

Typical Fingerprint and MIR Scale

   [Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of Assessing Ozone Formation] [Previous Section] [Next Section]





EXAMPLES OF REACTIVITY ASSESSMENT

  • Most abundant species evaluation using concentration and reactivity-weighted data: many less-abundant species based on concentration become important when reactivity is considered.
  • Frequency distribution (histogram): assess temporal changes in the total reactivity.
  • Summary statistics by time of day: assess change in total reactivity by time of day.
  • Fingerprint plots: perform inter-site comparisons, assess changes in composition with time of day.
  • Bar plots: assess spatial and temporal changes of the total reactivity, assess reactivity by species groups.

   [Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of Assessing Ozone Formation] [Previous Section] [Next Section]





TEN MOST ABUNDANT HYDROCARBON SPECIES
Shading indicates species on both concentration and reactivity-scaled abundance lists.


Pico Rivera, CA
July-August 1995


Concentration or Wt. Fraction

 
Reactivity-Scaled Data

Propane 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
Toluene m&p-Xylenes
 i-Pentane m-Diethylbenzene
n-Undecane Toluene
m&p-Xylenes Ethene
m-Diethylbenzene o-Xylene
Ethane Propene
n-Butane p-Diethylbenzene
n-Nonane i-Pentane
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene o-Ethyltoluene

   Data Source: Level 1, AIRS data.
Bold indicates species on both concentration and reactivity-scaled abundance lists.

  [Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of Assessing Ozone Formation] [Previous Section] [Next Section]





Upland, CA
July-August 1995

Concentration or Wt. Fraction

Reactivity-Scaled Data

i-Pentane 1-Butene
Toluene m-Xylene
Propane Toluene
1-Butene i-Pentane
n-Butane 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
n-Pentane o-Xylene
2-Methylpentane Ethene
Acetylene p-Xylene
Benzene Methylcyclopentane
Methylcyclopentane 1,2,3-Trimethylbenzene

 Data Source: Level 1, AIRS data.
Bold indicates species on both concentration and reactivity-scaled abundance lists.

   [Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of Assessing Ozone Formation] [Previous Section] [Next Section]





Chicago-Jardine, IL
June 1996

 Concentration or Wt. Fraction

  
Reactivity-Scaled Data

 Ethane Ethene
 i-Pentane Propene
 Propane m&p-Xylenes
 Toluene Toluene
 n-Butane 1-Butene
 Ethene i-Pentane
 n-Pentane o-Xylene
Acetylene n-Butane
Benzene m-Ethyltoluene
2-Methylpentane n-Pentane

Data Source: Level 1, AIRS data.
Bold indicates species on both concentration and reactivity-scaled abundance lists.

    [Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of Assessing Ozone Formation] [Previous Section] [Next Section]





Stafford, CT
June 1995

 Concentration or Wt. Fraction

 
Reactivity-Scaled Data

 Isoprene Isoprene
 Ethane  Ethene
 i-Pentane  m&p-Xylenes
 Toluene  Toluene
 Propane Propene
 n-Butane  1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
 n-Pentane  i-Pentane
 Benzene  o-Xylene
 Acetylene  1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
  Ethene/m&p-Xylenes  Styrene/t-2-Butene

Data Source: Level 0, preliminary data.
Bold indicates species on both concentration and reactivity-scaled abundance lists.

   [Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of Assessing Ozone Formation] [Previous Section] [Next Section]





East Hartford, CT
June 1995

 Concentration or Wt. Fraction

 
Reactivity-Scaled Data

 i-Pentane  m&p-xylenes
 Toluene  1,2,4-trimethylbenzene
 n-Butane  Propene
 Propane  i-Pentane
  m&p-xylenes  Isoprene
 Ethane  Ethene
 Acetylene  Toluene
 n-Pentane  1-pentene
 1-pentene  3-methyl-2-butene
 Ethene/Isoprene  Cyclopentene/o-xylene

Data Source: Level 0, preliminary data, CT DEP.
Bold indicates species on both concentration and reactivity-scaled abundance lists.

   [Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of Assessing Ozone Formation] [Previous Section] [Next Section]





 Chamizal (El Paso), TX
June 1995

 Concentration or Wt. Fraction

 
Reactivity-Scaled Data

 i-Pentane  m&p-xylenes
 Toluene  Ethene
 Propane  Propene
 n-Butane  1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
 Ethene  Toluene
 Ethane  o-Xylene
 Acetylene  1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
m&p-Xylenes  i-Pentane
 n-Hexane  t-2-Butene
 Benzene  t-2-Hexene

  Data Source: Chamizal - Level 1, AIRS data.
Bold indicates species on both concentration and reactivity-scaled abundance lists.

   [Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of Assessing Ozone Formation] [Previous Section] [Next Section]





Figure 5.

Frequency Distribution of Reactivity-Weighted Data.

   [Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of Assessing Ozone Formation] [Previous Section] [Next Section]





Figure 6.

Total Reactivity by Time of Day

   [Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of Assessing Ozone Formation] [Previous Section] [Next Section]





Figure 7.

Total Reactivity by Time of Day

   [Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of Assessing Ozone Formation] [Previous Section] [Next Section]





Figure 8.

Comparison of Average Fingerprints - June 1996 - Figure #1

   [Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of Assessing Ozone Formation] [Previous Section] [Next Section]





Figure 9.

Comparison of Average Fingerprints - June 1996 - Figure #2

   [Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of Assessing Ozone Formation] [Previous Section] [Next Section]





Figure 10.

Total Reactivity Using MIR

   [Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of Assessing Ozone Formation] [Previous Section] [Next Section]





RELATIVE AGE OF HYDROCARBON MIXTURE

  • VOC may be used as indicators of ozone formation potential and tracers of urban emissions.
  •  Relative abundance of more-reactive species (olefins, xylenes) should decrease with time during the day, while less-reactive species (paraffins, benzene) will appear to increase.

     [Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of Assessing Ozone Formation] [Previous Section] [Next Section]





 ANALYSIS EXAMPLES 

  • Summary statistics
  • Scatter plots
  • Diurnal plots of ratios
  • Nighttime vs. daytime ratios
  • Comparison of ratios among sites

   [Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of Assessing Ozone Formation] [Previous Section] [Next Section]





  ASSESSING THE AGE OF AN AIR MASS:
COMPARISON OF AVERAGE RATIOS
(JULY 1994)

 

  
 Sitea

Benzene:
Toluene

m&p-Xylene:
Benzene


Assessment

 Bronx, NYb

 0.28c

 1.55

 Fresh

 E. Hartford, CT

 0.39

 1.40

 Fresh

 Stafford, CT

 0.67

 0.56

 Aged

 Chicopee, MA

 0.22c

 1.59

 Fresh

 Lynn, MA

 0.40

 1.53

 Fresh

 Cape Eliz., ME

 0.74

 0.19

 Aged

 "Expected" Fresh
 "Expected" Aged

 ~0.4
 >0.4

 ~1.5
 <1.5

  

a Average over 1600-1800 EST unless otherwise noted.
b Average over 1500-1700 EST.
c Shows evidence of local enrichment of toluene in comparison to other areas.

Data source: Level 0, preliminary data from CT DEP, MA DEP, NY DEC, and ME DEP


Other ratios to investigate (more-reactive/less-reactive): propene/ethene, propene/acetylene, propane/ethane, m- & p-xylenes/ethylbenzene.

 

      [Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of Assessing Ozone Formation] [Previous Section] [Next Section]





Figure 11.

Scatter Plots of Benzene vs. toluene Concentrations

   [Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of Assessing Ozone Formation] [Previous Section] [Next Section]





Figure 12.

Benzene and toluene Concentrations at East Hartford, CT. During June 1995

   [Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of Assessing Ozone Formation] [Previous Section] [Next Section]





Figure 13.

Benzene and toluene Ratio at East Hartford, CT, in June 1995 by time of day.

   [Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of Assessing Ozone Formation] [Previous Section] [Next Section]





Figure 14.

Average Diurnal Concentrations - July 1994

   [Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of Assessing Ozone Formation] [Previous Section] [Next Section]





Figure 15.

Average Diurnal Ratios - July 1994

   [Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of Assessing Ozone Formation] [Previous Section] [Next Section]





SUMMARY

These analyses provide information which assist in the decisions on which species are the most important to ozone formation and begin to address the question of NOx versus hydrocarbon emission controls.

 Analysis/Procedure  Example Tool(s)
 Scatter Plots   Statistical Software, Spreadsheets
 Frequency Distributions  Statistics, Spreadsheet
Spatial and Temporal:
Bar, line, hi-lo, box plots
 Statistics, Spreadsheet, VOCDat, Voyager
 Ratios Along Transport Path  Review of Meteorology, Voyager
 Abundant Species  Spreadsheet, Statistics
 MIR*Concentration or Wt. Frac.  VOCDat, Spreadsheets

   [Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of Assessing Ozone Formation] [Previous Section] [Next Section]





 OZONE REFERENCES

California Air Resources Board (1994) California phase 2 reformulated gasoline news. RFG Forum, No. 1, December.

Carter W.P.L. (1991) Development of ozone reactivity scales for volatile organic compounds. Report prepared for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, EPA-600/3-91-050.

Carter W.P.L. (1994) Development of ozone reactivity scales for volatile organic compounds. J. Air & Waste Manag. Assoc. 44, 881-899.

Carter W.P.L. (1995) Computer modeling of environmental chamber measurements of maximum incremental reactivities of volatile organic compounds. Atmos. Environ. 29, 2513-2527.

Carter W.P.L., Pierce J. A., Luo D., and Malkina I. L. (1995) Environmental chamber study of maximum incremental reactivities of volatile organic compounds. Atmos. Environ. 29, 2499-2511.

Grosjean E., Grosjean D., Fraser M.P., and Cass G.R. (1996) Air quality model evaluation data for organics. 2. C1 - C14 carbonyls in Los Angeles air. Environ. Sci. Technol. 30, 2687-2703. 

Harley R.A., Hannglan M.P., and Cass G.R. (1992) Respeciation of organic gas emissions and the detection of excess unburned gasoline in the atmosphere. Environ. Sci. Technol. 26, 2395-2408.

Kelly T.J., Ward G.F., and Satola J. (1995) A comparison of NOy and conventional "NOx" measurements at a rural site in Pennsylvania. Paper presented at the Air & Waste Management Association and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Measurement of Toxic and Related Air Pollutants Conference, Research Triangle Park, NC, May 16-19.

Korc M.E. and Chinkin L.R. (1993) Improvement of the speciation profiles used in the development of the 1991 LMOS emission inventory. Draft final report prepared for the Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium, Des Plaines, IL, by Sonoma Technology, Inc., Santa Rosa, CA, STI-92324-1394-DFR; December.

LADCO (1995) Lake Michigan Ozone Study. 1994 data analysis report, version 1.1. Report prepared by Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium, Des Plaines, IL, May.

Lindsey C.G., Dye T.S., Main H.H., Korc M.E., Blumenthal D.L., Roberts P.T., Ray S.E., and Arthur M. (1995) Air quality and meteorological data analyses for the 1994 NARSTO-Northeast Air Quality Study. Draft final report prepared for Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA by Sonoma Technology, Inc., Santa Rosa, CA, STI-94362-1511-DFR, July.

Lurmann F.W. and Main H.H. (1992) Analysis of the ambient VOC data collected in the Southern California Air Quality Study. Report prepared for the California Air Resources Board, Sacramento, CA by Sonoma Technology, Inc., Santa Rosa, CA, STI-99120-1161-FR, Contract No. A823-130, February.

Main H.H. and Roberts P.T. (1993) Validation and analysis of the Lake Michigan Ozone Study ambient VOC data. Draft final report prepared for the Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium, Des Plaines, IL by Sonoma Technology, Inc., Santa Rosa, CA, STI-90217-1352-DFR, April.

Nelson P.F. and Quigley S.M. (1983) The m, p-xylenes: ethylbenzene ratio, a technique for estimating hydrocarbon age in ambient atmospheres. Atmos. Environ. 17, 659-662.

NESCAUM (1995) Preview of the 1994 ozone precursor concentrations in the northeastern U.S. 5/1/94 draft report prepared by the Ambient Monitoring and Assessment Committee of the Northeast States for Coordinated Air Use Management, Boston, MA.

Roberts P.T., Roth P.M., Blanchard C.L., Korc M.E., and Lurmann (1995b) Characteristics of VOC-limited and NOx-limited areas within the Lake Michigan air quality region. Technical memorandum prepared for Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium, Des Plaines, IL by Sonoma Technology, Inc., Santa Rosa, CA and Envair, Albany, CA, STI-92322-1504-TM, May.

Stoeckenius T.E., Ligocki M.P., Cohen B.L., Rosenbaum A.S., and Douglas S.G. (1994b) Recommendations for analysis of PAMS data. Final report prepared by Systems Applications International, San Rafael, CA, SYSAPP94-94/011r1, February.

Systems Applications International, Sonoma Technology Inc., Earth Tech, and Alpine Geophysics (1995) Gulf of Mexico Air Quality Study. Vol 1: Summary of data analysis and modeling. Final report prepared for U.S. Department of the Interior, Minerals Management Service, Gulf of Mexico OCS Region, New Orleans, LA, OCS Study, MMS 95-0038.

Yarwood G., Gray H.A., Ligocki M.P., and Whitten G.Z. (1994) Evaluation of ambient species profiles, ambient versus modeled NMHC:NOx and CO:NOx ratios, and source receptor analyses. Final report prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Mobil Sources, Research Triangle Park, NC, by Systems Applications International, San Rafael, CA, SYSAPP94-94/081, September. 

   [Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of Assessing Ozone Formation] [Previous Section] [Next Section]


Local Navigation


Jump to main content.