Session 6: Green Buildings: New Construction
Wednesday, July 16, 1997
2:45 - 4:00 pm
Speakers:
- Russell Belknap, National Park Services
- Chris Long, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
- David Gutherie, Department of Interior, Fish and Wildlife Services
Moderator:
- Ken Naser, Department of the Interior
The purpose of the session was to provide insights into the federal community's involvement in green buildings. Mr. Naser introduced himself by explaining that his office at the Department of the Interior is tasked with overseeing Executive Orders 12856 and 12873, which address, among other things, "green building" issues. He quoted from Bion Howard's, Green Building: A Primer for Consumers, Builders and Realtors: "Green Buildings are really resource efficient buildings and are very energy efficient, utilize construction materials wisely -- including recycled, renewable, and reused resources to the maximum extent practical -- are designed, constructed and commissioned to ensure they are healthy for their occupants, are typically more comfortable and easier to live with due to lower operating and owning costs, and are good for the planet." Mr. Naser also cited statistics that describe the enormous scale of the resources wasted in the United States. He suggested that the people who design, build, and operate buildings can do a lot to reduce the amount of waste by considering the environmental impacts of their buildings during all phases of its life--including building design, construction, and operation.
Speaker 1: Russell Belknap, National Park Services
Russ Belknap is with the National Parks Service and is involved with
several projects in and around Grand Canyon National Park. He has a lot
of experience with Internet databases devoted to sustainable design issues.
Mr. Belknap explained that the Park Service embarked on its sustainable
design program to address two apparently conflicting goals--preserving
the nation's parks and providing access to them. Their sustainable design
efforts allow them to do both.
He demonstrated the National Park Service's Sustainable Design and Construction
Database, which is available in Microsoft Access as a downloadable file
from the National Park Service website [http://www.nps.gov/facilities/]
.
The database contains three major sections:
- Building product information (with more than 700 entries describing 1000 separate products. Each product is rated in 14 different categories)
- Construction site recycling information (which lists more than 1900 companies who recycle construction debris)
- Resources information (with information on books, periodicals, and organizations)
It can be modified for specific local/regional applications. It allows
the user to list products and their environmental attributes by CSI category.
This information can help designers make environmentally informed decisions.
The Park Service is investigating ways to make the information available
on-line. One problem an on-line approach, however, is that activities
that are considered environmentally sustainable in one region of the country
might not be sustainable in another region.
Mr. Belknap explained that the Park Service is beginning to look at incorporating
the bio-regional differences into the database. He explained that this
is a particularly important issue for the Park Service because they manage
land throughout the United States. Local environmental (bio-regional)
concerns must be taken into account when making design and construction
decisions.
They are also looking to add information on construction site recycling,
which would allow the user to locate a local company to recycle construction
and demolition debris.
Speaker 2: Chris Long, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(Research Triangle, NC)
Chris Long is overseeing the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's design
and construction of a state-of-the-art research and office complex being
constructed in Research Triangle Park, NC. The facility incorporates lots
of sustainable design features.
Mr. Long explained that he is the project manager for the U.S. EPA's new
one-million square foot office and laboratory complex being built in Research
Triangle Park (RTP), NC. Construction has just recently begun, but they
learned a lot about environmentally preferable purchasing and "green
building" principles during the 3-year design phase.
He suggested that it was not enough to simply incorporate a few environmentally
preferable products into a building and call it a sustainable building.
He proposed looking at the entire building as a single product and attempting
to make it as environmentally preferable as possible.
He explained that the facility would house two of the three EPA national
laboratories. He explained that there were three competing, but interrelated
factors that had to be considered throughout the entire design process--the
environment, cost, and function. He explained that these three factors
mirror the slogan on the Environmentally Preferable Products (EPP) booth--Environment
+ Price + Performance = EPP.
Some of the difficulties with "greening" the EPA facility is
that it combines both laboratory and office space. This makes indoor air
quality a particularly important concern. EPA conducted several studies
and created several air-flow models to ensure that the final design maximizes
worker safety and energy concerns. It is difficult, for example, to ensure
an adequate supply of fresh air without drastically increasing the heating
and cooling requirements. One of the innovations they introduced into
the design was a fume hood with multiple settings to maximize worker safety,
but, at the same time minimize the strain on the heating and air conditioning
system. The fume hood is also part of the building's automated control
system and will automatically power down when the lab is not occupied.
The lab facility also includes an atrium connecting the lab facilities
with the office tower. While some people perceived the atrium as an extravagance,
Mr. Long explained that it was designed to reduce the surface area of
the external building. Enclosing it actually requires less energy to heat
and cool the building and, requires less materials to build it.
Mr. Long also explained that the concept of sustainable buildings extends
beyond the building itself to include the building's impact on the local
environment. EPA decided to reduce the number of access roads to the facility
from a four-lane divided highway to a two-lane road and to build parking
decks rather than surface parking to minimize the number of trees that
would have to be cut down. They also decided to put all utilities under
the roads rather than in an access lane beside the road. These activities
saved over 20 acres of trees.
They also minimized costs and the use of materials by removing curbing
and guttering from the site whenever possible. They opted for natural
bio-filtration instead of concrete gutters and pipes.
They further extended the concept of sustainable buildings by relying
on natural landscaping, including the use of indigenous plants and wild
flowers. This eliminates the need for artificial fertilizers and minimizes
the greenhouse gasses emitted by lawnmowers. In fact, people were so involved
with protecting the natural setting, according to Mr. Long, that an EPA
worker organized a "plant rescue" to relocate plants from the
building footprint to other areas on the site. In doing so, they saved
2,000-5,000 native plants. Mr. Long concluded with a quick list of some
of the items that are contained in the 6,000 pages of building specifications.
They include requirements to recycle all construction and demolition debris,
to prohibit on-site burning, to mix concrete onsite rather than trucking
it from another location (which saves thousands of truck trips and the
accompanying pollution), to use recycled content products whenever economically
feasible, to require that recycled-content carpet be used in the building
and be a part of a recyclable carpet program, and to finish the interior
of the building according to a schedule designed to minimize indoor air
quality concerns.
Mr. Long also offered to make available an extensive bibliography on sustainable
building practices that was compiled by James White at EPA. It is available
by e-mailing Mr. White [jwhite@engineer.aeerl.epa.gov].
Speaker 3: David Gutherie, Department of Interior, Fish and Wildlife Services
David Gutherie is the Energy Coordinator for the U.S. Department of Interior
(DOI) Fish and Wildlife Services and was recognized for exemplary service
by Department of Energy Secretary Hazel O'Leary. He has been actively
involved with the design and construction of DOI's National Conservation
Training Center.
Mr. Guthrie highlighted some of his agency's recent sustainable building
activities. Currently the Fish and Wildlife service is completing construction
of their National Conservation Training Center campus. The campus includes
19 buildings comprising 350,000 square feet and will house approximately
250 students at a time.
Construction began in July, 1994, and is expected to open in September,
1997. The Fish and Wildlife Service's goal was to use low-risk energy
conservation management technologies and applications that were readily
available, easily maintained, and cost effective. In addition, the project
met a number of other goals, including maximizing biodiversity, preventing
a net loss of trees, and maintaining local cropland for a demonstration
farming site. They incorporated environmentally preferable products when
possible.
For example, they:
- Required the use of fly ash as an additive in cement
- Used recovered content steel siding rather than natural wood siding to minimize the destruction of the spotted owl habitats where the wood siding would have originated
- Used recovered content insulation
- The floor in the physical training area is made from recycled tires
- Required the use of recycled gypsum made from recycled drywall and did not specify gypsum that is manufactured as a byproduct from sulfur dioxide air pollution control processes
The building was also designed to maximize energy efficiency. These included:
- A passive solar energy design with the building oriented on an east/west axis, large southern window areas, sun screens, extended roof overhangs for summer shading without precluding the winter sun, and landscaping for optimal summer shading and wind breaks.
- Incorporating the lowest life-cycle heating/ventilating and air-conditioning system, which includes using water chillers during off-peak hours; using heat pumps supplemented with electric heat; centralized controls; variable speed motors; no CFCs.
- Energy efficient lighting, especially task lighting and natural lighting.
- Superinsulation throughout the building, including argon-filled, double-pane windows and extensive insulation in ceilings, floors, walls, foundations, and masonry.
Finally they were concerned with indoor air quality issues. All interior
finishes and related systems such as adhesives, laminates, paints, and
carpeting were specified to reduce indoor air quality concerns.
Questions & Answers:
Q: What, if any, additional cost is required to incorporate green
building principles into the design process?
A: (Long) Not much. It probably requires 10-15 percent extra effort
because of the additional decisions that need to be made and the multiple
factors to consider. Most of this work, however, is on part of the building
owner, not the architect. It probably only cost 5 percent extra during
the design phase, but most of the cost was probably related to the additional
modeling that EPA required.
A: (Guthrie) A lot of the environmentally preferable components
are easy to incorporate if the architect knows to do so. Once architects
have their specs properly developed, incorporating them into green buildings
is easy.
Q: How do you know you are getting what you paid for? Is it possible
that the contractors just aren't providing what the architects spec?
A: (Long) EPA hired a construction contractor through GSA to oversee
the work of the primary contractor. EPA is extensively involved with overseeing
their new facility. Green components were intentionally introduced and
we want to make sure that they are included.
A: (Guthrie) Fish and Wildlife Service is working with the Army
Corps of Engineers to make sure that all of the specs are followed.
Q: Mr. Belknap, how did the National Park Service develop the product
specifications provided in the database?
A: (Belknap) We used AIA guidelines and ASTM specs, including proposed
specs. The database lists all of the references.
A: (Comment)A spokesperson for the Steel Recycling Institute stated
that all steel, including all steel siding, contains at least 25 percent
postconsumer steel. Steel is also cut to length, so there is not any waste
associated with its use. Architects and engineers should make frequent
use of it.
![[logo] US EPA](http://www.epa.gov/epafiles/images/logo_epaseal.gif)