Here are the messages between 20070101 and 20070131. 1. problem loading DEM into BASINS 2. Jack Generaux is retired 3. Re: problem loading DEM into BASINS 4. Re: problem loading DEM into BASINS 5. HSPF Error 6. Re: HSPF Error 7. error during automatic watershed delineation 8. RE: error during automatic watershed delineation (UNCLASSIFIED) 9. Re: error during automatic watershed delineation 10. Advanced Peak Flows 11. Re: Advanced Peak Flows 12. Re: Advanced Peak Flows 13. RE: Advanced Peak Flows 14. RE: Advanced Peak Flows 15. Re: Advanced Peak Flows 16. RE: Advanced Peak Flows 17. RE: Advanced Peak Flows 18. Re: Advanced Peak Flows 19. Zero Decay of a Dissolved General WQ constituent 20. Approval and Training 21. BASINS 4 and Training 22. Zero Decay of a Dissolved General WQ constituent - NEW INFO 23. Re: Zero Decay of a Dissolved General WQ constituent - NEW INFO 24. Re: Approval and Training 25. Platform of Basin 4.0 26. Re: Platform of Basin 4.0 27. Clipping DEM 28. Re: Clipping DEM 29. RE: Clipping DEM 30. Re: Clipping DEM 31. RE: Clipping DEM 32. Re: Clipping DEM 33. Automatic Watershed Delineation - BASINS4 34. Re: Automatic Watershed Delineation - BASINS4 35. Running Main Stem for Hydrology 36. Problem with web data download in BASINS4 37. HSPF Sediment Modeling 38. Suspended Sediment Question 39. HSPF Mass-Link Block point source 40. AGCHEM MODULE IMPLEMENTATION ----------------------------------------------------------- X-Message-Number: 1 X-lyris-Id: 149924 Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 19:49:53 -0600 From: "Curran, Joanna C" Subject: problem loading DEM into BASINS This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C7306B.FE07EC5B Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear BASINS users, I have run into a problem during what should be an easy project set-up. I cannot successfully load a DEM when setting up my project. I amusing a DEM from NED seamless data, which I converted from raster to grid so that it could be loaded into Arc3.1. It appears that the DEM successfully loads, as it is shown as a layer in BASINS. However, it does not match with the other layers already loaded through BASINS. If I zoom to the selected view of the DEM, I do not see the layers for streamlines or land use or anything else. I have tried re-installing BASINS, obtaining new DEMs, and nothing works. From what I have read, this should not be a difficult step. I have checked the projection, and all appears to be ok there.=20 I am hopeful that someone will have the answer to this problem. All suggestions are very much appreciated.=20 Sincerely, Joanna ------_=_NextPart_001_01C7306B.FE07EC5B Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable problem loading DEM into BASINS

Dear BASINS users,
I have run into a problem during what should be an easy project = set-up.
I cannot successfully load a DEM when setting up my project.  I = amusing
a DEM from NED seamless data, which I converted from raster to grid = so
that it could be loaded into Arc3.1.  It appears that the DEM
successfully loads, as it is shown as a layer in BASINS.  However, = it
does not match with the other layers already loaded through = BASINS.  If
I zoom to the selected view of the DEM, I do not see the layers for
streamlines or land use or anything else.  I have tried = re-installing
BASINS, obtaining new DEMs, and nothing works.  From what I have = read,
this should not be a difficult step.  I have checked the = projection, and
all appears to be ok there.
I am hopeful that someone will have the answer to this problem.  = All
suggestions are very much appreciated.

Sincerely,
Joanna

------_=_NextPart_001_01C7306B.FE07EC5B-- ----------------------------------------------------------- X-Message-Number: 2 X-lyris-Id: 149925 Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 20:04:03 -0600 From: Generaux.Jack@epamail.epa.gov Subject: Jack Generaux is retired I will be out of the office starting 12/29/2006 and will not return until 04/03/2008. ----------------------------------------------------------- X-Message-Number: 3 X-lyris-Id: 149929 Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 08:31:28 -0500 From: Partington.Ed@epamail.epa.gov Subject: Re: problem loading DEM into BASINS Did you get your NED using the Data Download tool or do you have your own? Did you project the DEM using the Grid Projector tool in BASINS? EPA/OW/OST/SHPD/RSTSSB/BASINS "Curran, Joanna C" Private list for BASINS users 01/04/2007 08:49 cc PM Subject [basinsinfo] problem loading DEM Please respond into BASINS to Private list for BASINS users Dear BASINS users, I have run into a problem during what should be an easy project set-up. I cannot successfully load a DEM when setting up my project. I amusing a DEM from NED seamless data, which I converted from raster to grid so that it could be loaded into Arc3.1. It appears that the DEM successfully loads, as it is shown as a layer in BASINS. However, it does not match with the other layers already loaded through BASINS. If I zoom to the selected view of the DEM, I do not see the layers for streamlines or land use or anything else. I have tried re-installing BASINS, obtaining new DEMs, and nothing works. From what I have read, this should not be a difficult step. I have checked the projection, and all appears to be ok there. I am hopeful that someone will have the answer to this problem. All suggestions are very much appreciated. Sincerely, Joanna ------------------------------------------ You are currently subscribed to the basinsinfo listserver. To unsubscribe, send the words unsubscribe basinsinfo to lyris@lists.epa.gov OR: Use the listserver's web interface at https://lists.epa.gov/cgi-bin/lyris.pl to manage your subscription. OR Contact the basinsinfo listserver owner at basinsinfo-Owner@lists.epa.gov ------------------------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------------- X-Message-Number: 4 X-lyris-Id: 149934 Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 10:20:01 -0600 (CST) From: Vladimir Alarcon Subject: Re: problem loading DEM into BASINS Joanna, re-project the grid using the grid projector provided in BASINS 3.1. From the Data option choose "Grid Projector". Leave the "input Grid Projection" in "Projections of the world" and "Geographic", and specify the output projection as the projection you are using in the other layers. Hope it helps. On Thu, 4 Jan 2007, Curran, Joanna C wrote: > > Dear BASINS users, > I have run into a problem during what should be an easy project set-up. > I cannot successfully load a DEM when setting up my project. I amusing > a DEM from NED seamless data, which I converted from raster to grid so > that it could be loaded into Arc3.1. It appears that the DEM > successfully loads, as it is shown as a layer in BASINS. However, it > does not match with the other layers already loaded through BASINS. If > I zoom to the selected view of the DEM, I do not see the layers for > streamlines or land use or anything else. I have tried re-installing > BASINS, obtaining new DEMs, and nothing works. From what I have read, > this should not be a difficult step. I have checked the projection, and > all appears to be ok there. > I am hopeful that someone will have the answer to this problem. All > suggestions are very much appreciated. > > Sincerely, > Joanna > > ------------------------------------------ > You are currently subscribed to the basinsinfo listserver. > > To unsubscribe, send the words unsubscribe basinsinfo to lyris@lists.epa.gov > OR: > Use the listserver's web interface at https://lists.epa.gov/cgi-bin/lyris.pl to manage your > subscription. > OR > Contact the basinsinfo listserver owner at basinsinfo-Owner@lists.epa.gov > ------------------------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------------- X-Message-Number: 5 X-lyris-Id: 149961 Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2007 13:26:15 -0500 From: Joshua Hunn Subject: HSPF Error I have been trying to compile a WinHSPF model and when I went to run the model, I encountered an error that is unfamiliar. It says: No file connected to unit (see "Input/Output" in the Lahey Fortran 90 Language Reference). Error occurred at line 79 of file C:\lib3.0\src\adwdn\UTWDMD.FOR. However, I can find no such file and was hoping that someone might be able to provide some assistance. Thanks, Josh ----------------------------------------------------------- X-Message-Number: 6 X-lyris-Id: 149964 Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 08:58:32 -0500 From: "Sillah Kargbo" Subject: Re: HSPF Error Hi Josh, I have had this message several times. For some reason the program fails = to read some files. What I have done is exit WinHSPF, back to BASINS = interface, then restart HSPF through BASINS model drop down menu. At one = occassion when that did not work I saved and closed BASINS and started up = the whole model again. You may want to try that and see if helps. Regards, G.A. Sillah Kargbo, PhD, P.Eng. Water Resources Engineer, Source Protection Planning Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority 120 Bayview Parway Newmarket, Ontario L3Y 3W3 Tel: (905) 967-0112 ext 309 Fax: (905) 967-1265 E-mail: s.kargbo@lsrca.on.ca >>> hunn@email.unc.edu 06/01/2007 1:26 pm >>> I have been trying to compile a WinHSPF model and when I went to run=20 the model, I encountered an error that is unfamiliar. It says: No file connected to unit (see "Input/Output" in the Lahey Fortran 90=20 Language Reference). Error occurred at line 79 of file C:\lib3.0\src\adwdn\UTWDMD.FOR. However, I can find no such file and was hoping that someone might be=20 able to provide some assistance. Thanks, Josh ------------------------------------------ You are currently subscribed to the basinsinfo listserver.=20 To unsubscribe, send the words unsubscribe basinsinfo to lyris@lists.epa.go= v=20 OR: Use the listserver's web interface at https://lists.epa.gov/cgi-bin/lyris.p= l to manage your=20 subscription. OR Contact the basinsinfo listserver owner at basinsinfo-Owner@lists.epa.gov= =20 ------------------------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------------- X-Message-Number: 7 X-lyris-Id: 150034 Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 13:17:11 -0600 From: "Curran, Joanna C" Subject: error during automatic watershed delineation This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C73422.C52EBD2A Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks to all who helped with my last post on projection issues when loading the DEM. However, I am still unable to delineate the watershed. I have tried using data downloaded from NED through BASINS as well as reading in DEMs from other sources but the error remains the same. In the first step of automatic watershed delineation, I receive this error: "All cells in grid have NODATA value. VAT will not be built." I have looked through the achieves for the listserve and seen this question a couple of times, but I was unable to find the fix. =20 If anyone has any suggestions, I will try them. =20 Thanks again Joanna =20 ----------------------------------------------- Joanna C. Curran, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Department of Geography Texas State University=20 San Marcos, Texas =20 http://www.geo.txstate.edu/directory/faculty/curran/Curran.html =20 =20 ------_=_NextPart_001_01C73422.C52EBD2A Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Thanks to all who helped with my last post on = projection issues when loading the DEM.  However, I am still unable to = delineate the watershed.  I have tried using data downloaded from NED through BASINS as well as = reading in DEMs from other sources but the error remains the same.  In the = first step of automatic watershed delineation, I receive this error:  = “All cells in grid have NODATA value.  VAT will not be = built.”

I have looked through the achieves for the listserve = and seen this question a couple of times, but I was unable to find the = fix. 

If anyone has any suggestions, I will try = them.

 

Thanks again

Joanna

 

-----------------------------------------------=

Joanna C. Curran, Ph.D.

Assistant Professor

Department of Geography

Texas State University =

San Marcos, Texas

 

= http://www.geo.txstate.edu/directory/faculty/curran/Curran.html=

 

------_=_NextPart_001_01C73422.C52EBD2A-- ----------------------------------------------------------- X-Message-Number: 8 X-lyris-Id: 150039 Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 14:34:27 -0500 From: "Bijhouwer, Paul LRB" Subject: RE: error during automatic watershed delineation (UNCLASSIFIED) Classification: UNCLASSIFIED=20 Caveats: NONE Joanna, Don't know if this will help, but I had some difficulty using an NED = dataset downloaded from the USGS seamless data server. The DEM was floating = point, whereas BASINS expects an integer grid. I could probably have converted = the dataset, but opted to use a statewide integer DEM that was available = instead. I does sound to me like there is something wrong or unexpected with your dataset. Are you able to visualize it using normal GIS functionality? = If you check some random data points (clicking with the information tool) = do you get integer grid values that are in the range expected? Paul Bijhouwer -----Original Message----- From: Curran, Joanna C [mailto:jc49@txstate.edu]=20 Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 2:17 PM To: Private list for BASINS users Subject: [basinsinfo] error during automatic watershed delineation Thanks to all who helped with my last post on projection issues when = loading the DEM. However, I am still unable to delineate the watershed. I have tried using data downloaded from NED through BASINS as well as reading = in DEMs from other sources but the error remains the same. In the first = step of automatic watershed delineation, I receive this error: "All cells in = grid have NODATA value. VAT will not be built." I have looked through the achieves for the listserve and seen this = question a couple of times, but I was unable to find the fix. =20 If anyone has any suggestions, I will try them. =20 Thanks again Joanna =20 ----------------------------------------------- Joanna C. Curran, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Department of Geography Texas State University=20 San Marcos, Texas =20 http://www.geo.txstate.edu/directory/faculty/curran/Curran.html =20 =20 ------------------------------------------ You are currently subscribed to the basinsinfo listserver.=20 To unsubscribe, send the words unsubscribe basinsinfo to = lyris@lists.epa.gov OR:=20 Use the listserver's web interface at = https://lists.epa.gov/cgi-bin/lyris.pl to manage your subscription.=20 OR Contact the basinsinfo listserver owner at = basinsinfo-Owner@lists.epa.gov ------------------------------------------=20 Classification: UNCLASSIFIED=20 Caveats: NONE ----------------------------------------------------------- X-Message-Number: 9 X-lyris-Id: 150048 Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:00:16 -0500 From: Partington.Ed@epamail.epa.gov Subject: Re: error during automatic watershed delineation QWZ0ZXIgaWRlbnRpZnlpbmcgeW91ciBHUklEIGEgd2luZG93IHBvcHMgdXAgYWJvdXQgdGhlIGVs ZXZhdGlvbiBvZiB0aGUNCnZhbHVlcy4gSSBiZWxpZXZlIE5FRCBpcyBpbiBjZW50aW1ldGVycy4N Cg0KICAgICAgICAgICA8cGFydGluZ3Rvbi5lZEBlcGEuZ292Pg0KICBFUEEvT1cvT1NUL1NIUEQv UlNUU1NCL0JBU0lOUw0KPGh0dHA6Ly93d3cuZXBhLmdvdi93YXRlcnNjaWVuY2UvYmFzaW5zPg0K DQoNCg0KICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgDQogICAgICAgICAgICAgIkN1cnJhbiwgSm9hbm5hICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICANCiAgICAgICAgICAgICBDIiAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIA0K ICAgICAgICAgICAgIDxqYzQ5QHR4c3RhdGUuZWQgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgVG8gDQogICAgICAgICAgICAgdT4gICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIFBy aXZhdGUgbGlzdCBmb3IgQkFTSU5TIHVzZXJzICAgICANCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgPGJhc2luc2luZm9AbGlzdHMuZXBhLmdvdj4gICAgICAgIA0KICAgICAg ICAgICAgIDAxLzA5LzIwMDcgMDI6MTcgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgY2MgDQogICAgICAgICAgICAgUE0gICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICANCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICBTdWJqZWN0IA0KICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICBbYmFzaW5zaW5mb10gZXJyb3IgZHVyaW5nICAgICAg ICAgDQogICAgICAgICAgICAgIFBsZWFzZSByZXNwb25kICAgICAgICAgIGF1dG9tYXRpYyB3YXRl cnNoZWQgZGVsaW5lYXRpb24gICANCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgdG8gICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIA0KICAgICAgICAgICAgIFByaXZh dGUgbGlzdCBmb3IgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgDQog ICAgICAgICAgICAgICBCQVNJTlMgdXNlcnMgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICANCiAgICAgICAgICAgICA8YmFzaW5zaW5mb0BsaXN0ICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIA0KICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIHMuZXBhLmdv dj4gICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgDQogICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICANCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIA0KDQoNCg0KDQpUaGFua3MgdG8gYWxsIHdobyBoZWxw ZWQgd2l0aCBteSBsYXN0IHBvc3Qgb24gcHJvamVjdGlvbiBpc3N1ZXMgd2hlbg0KbG9hZGluZyB0 aGUgREVNLiAgSG93ZXZlciwgSSBhbSBzdGlsbCB1bmFibGUgdG8gZGVsaW5lYXRlIHRoZSB3YXRl cnNoZWQuDQpJIGhhdmUgdHJpZWQgdXNpbmcgZGF0YSBkb3dubG9hZGVkIGZyb20gTkVEIHRocm91 Z2ggQkFTSU5TIGFzIHdlbGwgYXMNCnJlYWRpbmcgaW4gREVNcyBmcm9tIG90aGVyIHNvdXJjZXMg YnV0IHRoZSBlcnJvciByZW1haW5zIHRoZSBzYW1lLiAgSW4NCnRoZSBmaXJzdCBzdGVwIG9mIGF1 dG9tYXRpYyB3YXRlcnNoZWQgZGVsaW5lYXRpb24sIEkgcmVjZWl2ZSB0aGlzIGVycm9yOg0K4oCc QWxsIGNlbGxzIGluIGdyaWQgaGF2ZSBOT0RBVEEgdmFsdWUuICBWQVQgd2lsbCBub3QgYmUgYnVp bHQu4oCdDQpJIGhhdmUgbG9va2VkIHRocm91Z2ggdGhlIGFjaGlldmVzIGZvciB0aGUgbGlzdHNl cnZlIGFuZCBzZWVuIHRoaXMNCnF1ZXN0aW9uIGEgY291cGxlIG9mIHRpbWVzLCBidXQgSSB3YXMg dW5hYmxlIHRvIGZpbmQgdGhlIGZpeC4NCklmIGFueW9uZSBoYXMgYW55IHN1Z2dlc3Rpb25zLCBJ IHdpbGwgdHJ5IHRoZW0uDQoNClRoYW5rcyBhZ2Fpbg0KSm9hbm5hDQoNCi0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0t LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tDQpKb2FubmEgQy4gQ3VycmFuLCBQaC5E Lg0KQXNzaXN0YW50IFByb2Zlc3Nvcg0KRGVwYXJ0bWVudCBvZiBHZW9ncmFwaHkNClRleGFzIFN0 YXRlIFVuaXZlcnNpdHkNClNhbiBNYXJjb3MsIFRleGFzDQoNCmh0dHA6Ly93d3cuZ2VvLnR4c3Rh dGUuZWR1L2RpcmVjdG9yeS9mYWN1bHR5L2N1cnJhbi9DdXJyYW4uaHRtbA0KDQoNCg0KLS0tLS0t LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tDQpZb3UgYXJlIGN1cnJlbnRseSBz dWJzY3JpYmVkIHRvIHRoZSBiYXNpbnNpbmZvIGxpc3RzZXJ2ZXIuDQoNClRvIHVuc3Vic2NyaWJl LCBzZW5kIHRoZSB3b3JkcyB1bnN1YnNjcmliZSBiYXNpbnNpbmZvIHRvDQpseXJpc0BsaXN0cy5l cGEuZ292DQpPUjoNClVzZSB0aGUgbGlzdHNlcnZlcidzIHdlYiBpbnRlcmZhY2UgYXQNCmh0dHBz Oi8vbGlzdHMuZXBhLmdvdi9jZ2ktYmluL2x5cmlzLnBsIHRvIG1hbmFnZSB5b3VyDQpzdWJzY3Jp cHRpb24uDQpPUg0KQ29udGFjdCB0aGUgYmFzaW5zaW5mbyBsaXN0c2VydmVyIG93bmVyIGF0DQpi YXNpbnNpbmZvLU93bmVyQGxpc3RzLmVwYS5nb3YNCi0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0t LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLQ0KDQo= ----------------------------------------------------------- X-Message-Number: 10 X-lyris-Id: 150213 Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 13:50:53 -0500 From: "Sillah Kargbo" Subject: Advanced Peak Flows Hi Ladies and Gentlemen, I am getting the following results from my HSPF calibration runs: 1. Calculated peak flows are ahead of the observed. The calculated peaks = are occuring in Winter and the observed peaks between April and May; which = is the snow melt period in the watershed. 2. As a result of the above my winter flow volume errors are far greater = than for the summer flows. 3. Flow volume error for the simulation period is however less than 5%. 4. Very poor correlation coefficient; less than 0.1. What I have done: 1. increased UZSN in all land use categories except agriculture; to the = maximum limit in BASINS Tec. Note #6; 2. recalculated slopes of subwatersheds; input lesser slopes;=20 3. increased the length of overland flow plains; 4. increased Manning's overland flow coefficient. After doing all the above the peaks of my computed hydrograph are still = occuring in Winter. I wonder if anyone could suggest any futher actions that would help. Thanks in advance. =20 G.A. Sillah Kargbo, PhD, P.Eng. Water Resources Engineer, Source Protection Planning Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority 120 Bayview Parway Newmarket, Ontario L3Y 3W3 Tel: (905) 967-0112 ext 309 Fax: (905) 967-1265 E-mail: s.kargbo@lsrca.on.ca ----------------------------------------------------------- X-Message-Number: 11 X-lyris-Id: 150217 Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:51:07 -0500 (EST) From: jferrari@al.umces.edu Subject: Re: Advanced Peak Flows Are you using the degree-day approach for snow? If so, in my limited experience with HSPF the parameter KMELT can have a dramatic impact on results, so can the parameter SNOWCF (both in SNOW-PARM1). Also, depending on how large your watershed is, how many PERLNDS you have, and how many weather stations you have, snow and melt calcs can be affected by the lapse rate. Lapse rate calcs are based on the elevation difference between the PERLND and the weather station (in the ATEMP-DAT section of the UCI). If you have one large forested PERLND in a mountainous basin, the elevation difference is typically provided between the weather station and the average elevation of that PERLND (from the DEM). However, this average elevation will not accurately portray the spatial distribution of snow/rain across the watershed, in which case the model may be portraying rain when in fact it snowed...... Joe Ferrari Joseph Ferrari Faculty Research Assistant UMCES Appalachian Laboratory 301 Braddock Road Frostburg, MD 21532 > Hi Ladies and Gentlemen, > > I am getting the following results from my HSPF calibration runs: > > 1. Calculated peak flows are ahead of the observed. The calculated peaks > are occuring in Winter and the observed peaks between April and May; which > is the snow melt period in the watershed. > > 2. As a result of the above my winter flow volume errors are far greater > than for the summer flows. > > 3. Flow volume error for the simulation period is however less than 5%. > > 4. Very poor correlation coefficient; less than 0.1. > > What I have done: > > 1. increased UZSN in all land use categories except agriculture; to the > maximum limit in BASINS Tec. Note #6; > 2. recalculated slopes of subwatersheds; input lesser slopes; > 3. increased the length of overland flow plains; > 4. increased Manning's overland flow coefficient. > > After doing all the above the peaks of my computed hydrograph are still > occuring in Winter. > > I wonder if anyone could suggest any futher actions that would help. > > Thanks in advance. > > > > G.A. Sillah Kargbo, PhD, P.Eng. > Water Resources Engineer, Source Protection Planning > Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority > 120 Bayview Parway > Newmarket, Ontario L3Y 3W3 > Tel: (905) 967-0112 ext 309 > Fax: (905) 967-1265 > E-mail: s.kargbo@lsrca.on.ca > > ------------------------------------------ > You are currently subscribed to the basinsinfo listserver. > > To unsubscribe, send the words unsubscribe basinsinfo to > lyris@lists.epa.gov > OR: > Use the listserver's web interface at > https://lists.epa.gov/cgi-bin/lyris.pl to manage your > subscription. > OR > Contact the basinsinfo listserver owner at basinsinfo-Owner@lists.epa.gov > ------------------------------------------ > > > Joseph Ferrari Faculty Research Assistant UMCES Appalachian Laboratory 301 Braddock Road Frostburg, MD 21532 ----------------------------------------------------------- X-Message-Number: 12 X-lyris-Id: 150220 Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 15:23:26 -0500 From: "Sillah Kargbo" Subject: Re: Advanced Peak Flows Hi Joe, Thanks for responding. Yes, I am using the degree-day-method to simulate = snow acculation and melt. I did input the elevation differences in ATEMP. = My predominant land use is agriculture with only scattered patches of = forest, which I have taken into account of with the fraction of forest = cover in all the PERLNDs. From the BASINS calibration tutorials LSUR, = SLSUR, NSUR, INFILT, INTFW, IRC and UZSN affect the peaks and shape of the = hydrographs. I have also found that the shape of the hydrograph is very = sensitive to AGWRC. I have been playing around these parameters as = suggested in the BASINS Flow Calibration tutorial but I have not been = able to move my peaks to coincide the period peaks actuall occur in the = watershed. this why I am asking for help. I am also going to try the SNOW parametrs KMELT and SNOWCF as you = suggested. Thanks again, G.A. Sillah Kargbo, PhD, P.Eng. Water Resources Engineer, Source Protection Planning Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority 120 Bayview Parway Newmarket, Ontario L3Y 3W3 Tel: (905) 967-0112 ext 309 Fax: (905) 967-1265 E-mail: s.kargbo@lsrca.on.ca >>> jferrari@al.umces.edu 12/01/2007 2:51 pm >>> Are you using the degree-day approach for snow? If so, in my limited experience with HSPF the parameter KMELT can have a dramatic impact on results, so can the parameter SNOWCF (both in SNOW-PARM1). Also, depending on how large your watershed is, how many PERLNDS you have, and how many weather stations you have, snow and melt calcs can be affected by the lapse rate. Lapse rate calcs are based on the elevation difference between the PERLND and the weather station (in the ATEMP-DAT section of the UCI). If you have one large forested PERLND in a mountainous basin, the elevation difference is typically provided between the weather station and the average elevation of that PERLND (from the DEM). However, this average elevation will not accurately portray the spatial distribution of snow/rain across the watershed, in which case the model may be portraying rain when in fact it snowed...... Joe Ferrari Joseph Ferrari Faculty Research Assistant UMCES Appalachian Laboratory 301 Braddock Road Frostburg, MD 21532 > Hi Ladies and Gentlemen, > > I am getting the following results from my HSPF calibration runs: > > 1. Calculated peak flows are ahead of the observed. The calculated peaks > are occuring in Winter and the observed peaks between April and May; = which > is the snow melt period in the watershed. > > 2. As a result of the above my winter flow volume errors are far greater > than for the summer flows. > > 3. Flow volume error for the simulation period is however less than 5%. > > 4. Very poor correlation coefficient; less than 0.1. > > What I have done: > > 1. increased UZSN in all land use categories except agriculture; to the > maximum limit in BASINS Tec. Note #6; > 2. recalculated slopes of subwatersheds; input lesser slopes; > 3. increased the length of overland flow plains; > 4. increased Manning's overland flow coefficient. > > After doing all the above the peaks of my computed hydrograph are still > occuring in Winter. > > I wonder if anyone could suggest any futher actions that would help. > > Thanks in advance. > > > > G.A. Sillah Kargbo, PhD, P.Eng. > Water Resources Engineer, Source Protection Planning > Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority > 120 Bayview Parway > Newmarket, Ontario L3Y 3W3 > Tel: (905) 967-0112 ext 309 > Fax: (905) 967-1265 > E-mail: s.kargbo@lsrca.on.ca=20 > > ------------------------------------------ > You are currently subscribed to the basinsinfo listserver. > > To unsubscribe, send the words unsubscribe basinsinfo to > lyris@lists.epa.gov=20 > OR: > Use the listserver's web interface at > https://lists.epa.gov/cgi-bin/lyris.pl to manage your > subscription. > OR > Contact the basinsinfo listserver owner at basinsinfo-Owner@lists.epa.gov= =20 > ------------------------------------------ > > > Joseph Ferrari Faculty Research Assistant UMCES Appalachian Laboratory 301 Braddock Road Frostburg, MD 21532 ------------------------------------------ You are currently subscribed to the basinsinfo listserver.=20 To unsubscribe, send the words unsubscribe basinsinfo to lyris@lists.epa.go= v=20 OR: Use the listserver's web interface at https://lists.epa.gov/cgi-bin/lyris.p= l to manage your=20 subscription. OR Contact the basinsinfo listserver owner at basinsinfo-Owner@lists.epa.gov= =20 ------------------------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------------- X-Message-Number: 13 X-lyris-Id: 150221 Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 15:41:08 -0500 From: "Amanjot Singh" Subject: RE: Advanced Peak Flows Look at this paper http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/99015595/PDFSTART Amanjot Singh, Ph.D., P.Eng. School of Engineering, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 5K6 -----Original Message----- From: Sillah Kargbo [mailto:S.Kargbo@lsrca.on.ca] Sent: January 12, 2007 1:51 PM To: Private list for BASINS users Subject: [basinsinfo] Advanced Peak Flows Hi Ladies and Gentlemen, I am getting the following results from my HSPF calibration runs: 1. Calculated peak flows are ahead of the observed. The calculated peaks are occuring in Winter and the observed peaks between April and May; which is the snow melt period in the watershed. 2. As a result of the above my winter flow volume errors are far greater than for the summer flows. 3. Flow volume error for the simulation period is however less than 5%. 4. Very poor correlation coefficient; less than 0.1. What I have done: 1. increased UZSN in all land use categories except agriculture; to the maximum limit in BASINS Tec. Note #6; 2. recalculated slopes of subwatersheds; input lesser slopes; 3. increased the length of overland flow plains; 4. increased Manning's overland flow coefficient. After doing all the above the peaks of my computed hydrograph are still occuring in Winter. I wonder if anyone could suggest any futher actions that would help. Thanks in advance. G.A. Sillah Kargbo, PhD, P.Eng. Water Resources Engineer, Source Protection Planning Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority 120 Bayview Parway Newmarket, Ontario L3Y 3W3 Tel: (905) 967-0112 ext 309 Fax: (905) 967-1265 E-mail: s.kargbo@lsrca.on.ca ------------------------------------------ You are currently subscribed to the basinsinfo listserver. To unsubscribe, send the words unsubscribe basinsinfo to lyris@lists.epa.gov OR: Use the listserver's web interface at https://lists.epa.gov/cgi-bin/lyris.pl to manage your subscription. OR Contact the basinsinfo listserver owner at basinsinfo-Owner@lists.epa.gov ------------------------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------------- X-Message-Number: 14 X-lyris-Id: 150223 Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 15:55:21 -0500 From: "Hagerman, James Ray" Subject: RE: Advanced Peak Flows The parameters you mention (LSUR, SLSUR, NSUR, INFILT, INTFW, IRC and UZSN) are important for hydrograph shape on the scale of hours or days (depending on watershed size), not months. =20 It sounds like you are either not getting precip in the form of snow or it is melting too quickly. Check the snow pack time series (PACK) and maybe the water released from the pack (WYIELD) and start troubleshooting from there. =20 Jim Hagerman TVA -----Original Message----- From: Sillah Kargbo [mailto:S.Kargbo@lsrca.on.ca]=20 Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 3:23 PM To: Private list for BASINS users Subject: Re: [basinsinfo] Advanced Peak Flows Hi Joe, Thanks for responding. Yes, I am using the degree-day-method to simulate snow acculation and melt. I did input the elevation differences in ATEMP. My predominant land use is agriculture with only scattered patches of forest, which I have taken into account of with the fraction of forest cover in all the PERLNDs. From the BASINS calibration tutorials LSUR, SLSUR, NSUR, INFILT, INTFW, IRC and UZSN affect the peaks and shape of the hydrographs. I have also found that the shape of the hydrograph is very sensitive to AGWRC. I have been playing around these parameters as suggested in the BASINS Flow Calibration tutorial but I have not been able to move my peaks to coincide the period peaks actuall occur in the watershed. this why I am asking for help. I am also going to try the SNOW parametrs KMELT and SNOWCF as you suggested. Thanks again, G.A. Sillah Kargbo, PhD, P.Eng. Water Resources Engineer, Source Protection Planning Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority 120 Bayview Parway Newmarket, Ontario L3Y 3W3 Tel: (905) 967-0112 ext 309 Fax: (905) 967-1265 E-mail: s.kargbo@lsrca.on.ca >>> jferrari@al.umces.edu 12/01/2007 2:51 pm >>> Are you using the degree-day approach for snow? If so, in my limited experience with HSPF the parameter KMELT can have a dramatic impact on results, so can the parameter SNOWCF (both in SNOW-PARM1). Also, depending on how large your watershed is, how many PERLNDS you have, and how many weather stations you have, snow and melt calcs can be affected by the lapse rate. Lapse rate calcs are based on the elevation difference between the PERLND and the weather station (in the ATEMP-DAT section of the UCI). If you have one large forested PERLND in a mountainous basin, the elevation difference is typically provided between the weather station and the average elevation of that PERLND (from the DEM). However, this average elevation will not accurately portray the spatial distribution of snow/rain across the watershed, in which case the model may be portraying rain when in fact it snowed...... Joe Ferrari Joseph Ferrari Faculty Research Assistant UMCES Appalachian Laboratory 301 Braddock Road Frostburg, MD 21532 > Hi Ladies and Gentlemen, > > I am getting the following results from my HSPF calibration runs: > > 1. Calculated peak flows are ahead of the observed. The calculated peaks > are occuring in Winter and the observed peaks between April and May; which > is the snow melt period in the watershed. > > 2. As a result of the above my winter flow volume errors are far greater > than for the summer flows. > > 3. Flow volume error for the simulation period is however less than 5%. > > 4. Very poor correlation coefficient; less than 0.1. > > What I have done: > > 1. increased UZSN in all land use categories except agriculture; to the > maximum limit in BASINS Tec. Note #6; > 2. recalculated slopes of subwatersheds; input lesser slopes; > 3. increased the length of overland flow plains; > 4. increased Manning's overland flow coefficient. > > After doing all the above the peaks of my computed hydrograph are still > occuring in Winter. > > I wonder if anyone could suggest any futher actions that would help. > > Thanks in advance. > > > > G.A. Sillah Kargbo, PhD, P.Eng. > Water Resources Engineer, Source Protection Planning > Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority > 120 Bayview Parway > Newmarket, Ontario L3Y 3W3 > Tel: (905) 967-0112 ext 309 > Fax: (905) 967-1265 > E-mail: s.kargbo@lsrca.on.ca=20 > > ------------------------------------------ > You are currently subscribed to the basinsinfo listserver. > > To unsubscribe, send the words unsubscribe basinsinfo to > lyris@lists.epa.gov=20 > OR: > Use the listserver's web interface at > https://lists.epa.gov/cgi-bin/lyris.pl to manage your > subscription. > OR > Contact the basinsinfo listserver owner at basinsinfo-Owner@lists.epa.gov=20 > ------------------------------------------ > > > Joseph Ferrari Faculty Research Assistant UMCES Appalachian Laboratory 301 Braddock Road Frostburg, MD 21532 ------------------------------------------ You are currently subscribed to the basinsinfo listserver.=20 To unsubscribe, send the words unsubscribe basinsinfo to lyris@lists.epa.gov=20 OR: Use the listserver's web interface at https://lists.epa.gov/cgi-bin/lyris.pl to manage your=20 subscription. OR Contact the basinsinfo listserver owner at basinsinfo-Owner@lists.epa.gov=20 ------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------ You are currently subscribed to the basinsinfo listserver.=20 To unsubscribe, send the words unsubscribe basinsinfo to lyris@lists.epa.gov OR: Use the listserver's web interface at https://lists.epa.gov/cgi-bin/lyris.pl to manage your=20 subscription. OR Contact the basinsinfo listserver owner at basinsinfo-Owner@lists.epa.gov ------------------------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------------- X-Message-Number: 15 X-lyris-Id: 150227 Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:28:28 -0800 From: Tony Donigian Subject: Re: Advanced Peak Flows Try reducing KMELT, that should delay the melt period.
And the SNOWCF should not be more than 1.2 to 1.5 in most cases.
you should also check to see if you are simulating the correct form of precip, snow versus rain - if not then check/adjust the TSNOW parm, and possibly are-check that the air temp adjustment is reasonable.

Tony
Donigian



Sillah Kargbo wrote:
Hi Joe,
Thanks for responding. Yes, I am using the degree-day-method to simulate snow 
acculation and melt. I did input the elevation differences in ATEMP. My 
predominant land use is agriculture with only scattered patches of forest, 
which I have taken into account of with the fraction of forest cover in all the 
PERLNDs. From the BASINS calibration tutorials LSUR, SLSUR, NSUR, INFILT, 
INTFW, IRC and UZSN affect the peaks and shape of the hydrographs.  I have also 
found that the shape of the hydrograph is very sensitive to AGWRC. I have been 
playing around these parameters as suggested in the  BASINS Flow Calibration 
tutorial but I have not been able to move my peaks to coincide the period peaks 
actuall occur in the watershed. this why I am asking for help.

I am also going to try the SNOW parametrs KMELT and SNOWCF as you suggested .

Thanks again,

G.A. Sillah Kargbo, PhD, P.Eng.
Water Resources Engineer, Source Protection Planning
Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority
120 Bayview Parway
Newmarket, Ontario L3Y 3W3
Tel: (905) 967-0112 ext 309
Fax: (905) 967-1265
E-mail: s.kargbo@lsrca.on.ca

  
jferrari@al.umces.edu 12/01/2007 2:51 
pm >>>
        
Are you using the degree-day approach for snow?  If so, 
in my limited
experience with HSPF the parameter KMELT can have a dramatic impact on
results, so can the parameter SNOWCF (both in SNOW-PARM1).  Also,
depending on how large your watershed is, how many PERLNDS you have, and
how many weather stations you have, snow and melt calcs can be affected by
the lapse rate.  Lapse rate calcs are based on the elevation difference
between the PERLND and the weather station (in the ATEMP-DAT section of
the UCI).  If you have one large forested PERLND in a mountainous basin,
the elevation difference is typically provided between the weather station
and the average elevation of that PERLND (from the DEM).  However, this
average elevation will not accurately portray the spatial distribution of
snow/rain across the watershed, in which case the model may be portraying
rain when in fact it snowed......

Joe Ferrari

Joseph Ferrari
Faculty Research Assistant
UMCES Appalachian Laboratory
301 Braddock Road
Frostburg, MD 21532

  
Hi Ladies and Gentlemen,

I am getting the following results from my HSPF calibration runs:

1. Calculated peak flows are ahead of the observed. The calculated peaks
are occuring in Winter and the observed peaks between April and May; which
is the snow melt period in the watershed.

2. As a result of the above my winter flow volume errors are far greater
than for the summer flows.

3. Flow volume error for the simulation period is however less than 5%.

4. Very poor correlation coefficient; less than 0.1.

What I have done:

1. increased UZSN in all land use categories except agriculture; to the
maximum limit in BASINS Tec. Note #6;
2. recalculated slopes of subwatersheds; input lesser slopes;
3. increased the length of overland flow plains;
4. increased Manning's overland flow coefficient.

After doing all the above the peaks of my computed hydrograph are still
occuring in Winter.

I wonder if anyone could suggest any futher actions that would help.

Thanks in advance.



G.A. Sillah Kargbo, PhD, P.Eng.
Water Resources Engineer, Source Protection Planning
Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority
120 Bayview Parway
Newmarket, Ontario L3Y 3W3
Tel: (905) 967-0112 ext 309
Fax: (905) 967-1265
E-mail: s.kargbo@lsrca.on.ca 

------------------------------------------
You are currently subscribed to the basinsinfo listserver.

To unsubscribe, send the words unsubscribe basinsinfo to
lyris@lists.epa.gov 
OR:
Use the listserver's web interface at
https://lists.epa.gov/cgi-bin/lyris.pl to manage your
subscription.
OR
Contact the basinsinfo listserver owner at basinsinfo-Owner@lists.epa.gov 
------------------------------------------



    


Joseph Ferrari
Faculty Research Assistant
UMCES Appalachian Laboratory
301 Braddock Road
Frostburg, MD 21532


------------------------------------------
You are currently subscribed to the basinsinfo listserver. 

To unsubscribe, send the words unsubscribe basinsinfo to lyris@lists.epa.gov 
OR:
Use the listserver's web interface at https://lists.epa.gov/cgi-bin/lyris.pl to manage your 
subscription.
OR
Contact the basinsinfo listserver owner at basinsinfo-Owner@lists.epa.gov 
------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------
You are currently subscribed to the basinsinfo listserver. 

To unsubscribe, send the words unsubscribe basinsinfo to lyris@lists.epa.gov
OR:
Use the listserver's web interface at https://lists.epa.gov/cgi-bin/lyris.pl to manage your 
subscription.
OR
Contact the basinsinfo listserver owner at basinsinfo-Owner@lists.epa.gov
------------------------------------------



  

-- 
Tony Donigian
AQUA TERRA Consultants
2685 Marine Way, Suite 1314
Mountain View, CA 94043-1115
650-962-1864; fax 650-962-0706
----------------------------------------------------------- X-Message-Number: 16 X-lyris-Id: 150228 Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 15:43:09 -0500 From: "Sillah Kargbo" Subject: RE: Advanced Peak Flows Thanks Dr. Singh. I will go get it right away. I will let you how helpful = it will be. My regards, G.A. Sillah Kargbo, PhD, P.Eng. Water Resources Engineer, Source Protection Planning Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority 120 Bayview Parway Newmarket, Ontario L3Y 3W3 Tel: (905) 967-0112 ext 309 Fax: (905) 967-1265 E-mail: s.kargbo@lsrca.on.ca >>> asingh@uoguelph.ca 12/01/2007 3:41 pm >>> Look at this paper http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/99015595/PDFSTART=20 Amanjot Singh, Ph.D., P.Eng. School of Engineering, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 5K6 -----Original Message----- From: Sillah Kargbo [mailto:S.Kargbo@lsrca.on.ca]=20 Sent: January 12, 2007 1:51 PM To: Private list for BASINS users Subject: [basinsinfo] Advanced Peak Flows Hi Ladies and Gentlemen, I am getting the following results from my HSPF calibration runs: 1. Calculated peak flows are ahead of the observed. The calculated peaks = are occuring in Winter and the observed peaks between April and May; which is the snow melt period in the watershed. 2. As a result of the above my winter flow volume errors are far greater than for the summer flows. 3. Flow volume error for the simulation period is however less than 5%. 4. Very poor correlation coefficient; less than 0.1. What I have done: 1. increased UZSN in all land use categories except agriculture; to the maximum limit in BASINS Tec. Note #6; 2. recalculated slopes of subwatersheds; input lesser slopes;=20 3. increased the length of overland flow plains; 4. increased Manning's overland flow coefficient. After doing all the above the peaks of my computed hydrograph are still occuring in Winter. I wonder if anyone could suggest any futher actions that would help. Thanks in advance. =20 G.A. Sillah Kargbo, PhD, P.Eng. Water Resources Engineer, Source Protection Planning Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority 120 Bayview Parway Newmarket, Ontario L3Y 3W3 Tel: (905) 967-0112 ext 309 Fax: (905) 967-1265 E-mail: s.kargbo@lsrca.on.ca=20 ------------------------------------------ You are currently subscribed to the basinsinfo listserver.=20 To unsubscribe, send the words unsubscribe basinsinfo to lyris@lists.epa.go= v=20 OR: Use the listserver's web interface at https://lists.epa.gov/cgi-bin/lyris.p= l=20 to manage your=20 subscription. OR Contact the basinsinfo listserver owner at basinsinfo-Owner@lists.epa.gov= =20 ------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------ You are currently subscribed to the basinsinfo listserver.=20 To unsubscribe, send the words unsubscribe basinsinfo to lyris@lists.epa.go= v=20 OR: Use the listserver's web interface at https://lists.epa.gov/cgi-bin/lyris.p= l to manage your=20 subscription. OR Contact the basinsinfo listserver owner at basinsinfo-Owner@lists.epa.gov= =20 ------------------------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------------- X-Message-Number: 17 X-lyris-Id: 150229 Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 15:56:40 -0500 From: "Sillah Kargbo" Subject: RE: Advanced Peak Flows Thanks for replying. I will try your suggestions. My regards, G.A. Sillah Kargbo, PhD, P.Eng. Water Resources Engineer, Source Protection Planning Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority 120 Bayview Parway Newmarket, Ontario L3Y 3W3 Tel: (905) 967-0112 ext 309 Fax: (905) 967-1265 E-mail: s.kargbo@lsrca.on.ca >>> jrhagerman@tva.gov 12/01/2007 3:55 pm >>> The parameters you mention (LSUR, SLSUR, NSUR, INFILT, INTFW, IRC and UZSN) are important for hydrograph shape on the scale of hours or days (depending on watershed size), not months. =20 It sounds like you are either not getting precip in the form of snow or it is melting too quickly. Check the snow pack time series (PACK) and maybe the water released from the pack (WYIELD) and start troubleshooting from there. =20 Jim Hagerman TVA -----Original Message----- From: Sillah Kargbo [mailto:S.Kargbo@lsrca.on.ca]=20 Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 3:23 PM To: Private list for BASINS users Subject: Re: [basinsinfo] Advanced Peak Flows Hi Joe, Thanks for responding. Yes, I am using the degree-day-method to simulate snow acculation and melt. I did input the elevation differences in ATEMP. My predominant land use is agriculture with only scattered patches of forest, which I have taken into account of with the fraction of forest cover in all the PERLNDs. From the BASINS calibration tutorials LSUR, SLSUR, NSUR, INFILT, INTFW, IRC and UZSN affect the peaks and shape of the hydrographs. I have also found that the shape of the hydrograph is very sensitive to AGWRC. I have been playing around these parameters as suggested in the BASINS Flow Calibration tutorial but I have not been able to move my peaks to coincide the period peaks actuall occur in the watershed. this why I am asking for help. I am also going to try the SNOW parametrs KMELT and SNOWCF as you suggested. Thanks again, G.A. Sillah Kargbo, PhD, P.Eng. Water Resources Engineer, Source Protection Planning Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority 120 Bayview Parway Newmarket, Ontario L3Y 3W3 Tel: (905) 967-0112 ext 309 Fax: (905) 967-1265 E-mail: s.kargbo@lsrca.on.ca=20 >>> jferrari@al.umces.edu 12/01/2007 2:51 pm >>> Are you using the degree-day approach for snow? If so, in my limited experience with HSPF the parameter KMELT can have a dramatic impact on results, so can the parameter SNOWCF (both in SNOW-PARM1). Also, depending on how large your watershed is, how many PERLNDS you have, and how many weather stations you have, snow and melt calcs can be affected by the lapse rate. Lapse rate calcs are based on the elevation difference between the PERLND and the weather station (in the ATEMP-DAT section of the UCI). If you have one large forested PERLND in a mountainous basin, the elevation difference is typically provided between the weather station and the average elevation of that PERLND (from the DEM). However, this average elevation will not accurately portray the spatial distribution of snow/rain across the watershed, in which case the model may be portraying rain when in fact it snowed...... Joe Ferrari Joseph Ferrari Faculty Research Assistant UMCES Appalachian Laboratory 301 Braddock Road Frostburg, MD 21532 > Hi Ladies and Gentlemen, > > I am getting the following results from my HSPF calibration runs: > > 1. Calculated peak flows are ahead of the observed. The calculated peaks > are occuring in Winter and the observed peaks between April and May; which > is the snow melt period in the watershed. > > 2. As a result of the above my winter flow volume errors are far greater > than for the summer flows. > > 3. Flow volume error for the simulation period is however less than 5%. > > 4. Very poor correlation coefficient; less than 0.1. > > What I have done: > > 1. increased UZSN in all land use categories except agriculture; to the > maximum limit in BASINS Tec. Note #6; > 2. recalculated slopes of subwatersheds; input lesser slopes; > 3. increased the length of overland flow plains; > 4. increased Manning's overland flow coefficient. > > After doing all the above the peaks of my computed hydrograph are still > occuring in Winter. > > I wonder if anyone could suggest any futher actions that would help. > > Thanks in advance. > > > > G.A. Sillah Kargbo, PhD, P.Eng. > Water Resources Engineer, Source Protection Planning > Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority > 120 Bayview Parway > Newmarket, Ontario L3Y 3W3 > Tel: (905) 967-0112 ext 309 > Fax: (905) 967-1265 > E-mail: s.kargbo@lsrca.on.ca=20 > > ------------------------------------------ > You are currently subscribed to the basinsinfo listserver. > > To unsubscribe, send the words unsubscribe basinsinfo to > lyris@lists.epa.gov=20 > OR: > Use the listserver's web interface at > https://lists.epa.gov/cgi-bin/lyris.pl to manage your > subscription. > OR > Contact the basinsinfo listserver owner at basinsinfo-Owner@lists.epa.gov=20 > ------------------------------------------ > > > Joseph Ferrari Faculty Research Assistant UMCES Appalachian Laboratory 301 Braddock Road Frostburg, MD 21532 ------------------------------------------ You are currently subscribed to the basinsinfo listserver.=20 To unsubscribe, send the words unsubscribe basinsinfo to lyris@lists.epa.gov=20 OR: Use the listserver's web interface at https://lists.epa.gov/cgi-bin/lyris.pl to manage your=20 subscription. OR Contact the basinsinfo listserver owner at basinsinfo-Owner@lists.epa.gov=20 ------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------ You are currently subscribed to the basinsinfo listserver.=20 To unsubscribe, send the words unsubscribe basinsinfo to lyris@lists.epa.gov=20 OR: Use the listserver's web interface at https://lists.epa.gov/cgi-bin/lyris.pl to manage your=20 subscription. OR Contact the basinsinfo listserver owner at basinsinfo-Owner@lists.epa.gov=20 ------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------ You are currently subscribed to the basinsinfo listserver.=20 To unsubscribe, send the words unsubscribe basinsinfo to lyris@lists.epa.go= v=20 OR: Use the listserver's web interface at https://lists.epa.gov/cgi-bin/lyris.p= l to manage your=20 subscription. OR Contact the basinsinfo listserver owner at basinsinfo-Owner@lists.epa.gov= =20 ------------------------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------------- X-Message-Number: 18 X-lyris-Id: 150230 Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 09:57:33 -0500 From: "Sillah Kargbo" Subject: Re: Advanced Peak Flows Thanks Tony. I am going to try your suggestions. My best regards, Sillah. >>> donigian@aquaterra.com 12/01/2007 5:28 pm >>> Try reducing KMELT, that should delay the melt period. And the SNOWCF should not be more than 1.2 to 1.5 in most cases. you should also check to see if you are simulating the correct form of = precip, snow versus rain - if not then check/adjust the TSNOW parm, and = possibly are-check that the air temp adjustment is reasonable. Tony Donigian Sillah Kargbo wrote: Hi Joe,Thanks for responding. Yes, I am using the = degree-day-method to simulate snow acculation and melt. I did input the = elevation differences in ATEMP. My predominant land use is agriculture = with only scattered patches of forest, which I have taken into account of = with the fraction of forest cover in all the PERLNDs. From the BASINS = calibration tutorials LSUR, SLSUR, NSUR, INFILT, INTFW, IRC and UZSN = affect the peaks and shape of the hydrographs. I have also found that the = shape of the hydrograph is very sensitive to AGWRC. I have been playing = around these parameters as suggested in the BASINS Flow Calibration = tutorial but I have not been able to move my peaks to coincide the period = peaks actuall occur in the watershed. this why I am asking for help.I am = also going to try the SNOW parametrs KMELT and SNOWCF as you suggested = .Thanks again,G.A. Sillah Kargbo, PhD, P.Eng.Water Resources Engineer, = Source Protection PlanningLake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority120 = Bayview ParwayNewmarket, Ontario L3Y 3W3Tel: (905) 967-0112 ext 309Fax: = (905) 967-1265E-mail: s.kargbo@lsrca.on.ca jferrari@al.umces.edu = 12/01/2007 2:51 pm >>> Are you using the degree-day approach for = snow? If so, in my limitedexperience with HSPF the parameter KMELT can = have a dramatic impact onresults, so can the parameter SNOWCF (both in = SNOW-PARM1). Also,depending on how large your watershed is, how many = PERLNDS you have, andhow many weather stations you have, snow and melt = calcs can be affected bythe lapse rate. Lapse rate calcs are based on the = elevation differencebetween the PERLND and the weather station (in the = ATEMP-DAT section ofthe UCI). If you have one large forested PERLND in a = mountainous basin,the elevation difference is typically provided between = the weather stationand the average elevation of that PERLND (from the = DEM). However, thisaverage elevation will not accurately portray the = spatial distribution ofsnow/rain across the watershed, in which case the = model may be portrayingrain when in fact it snowed......Joe FerrariJoseph = FerrariFaculty Research AssistantUMCES Appalachian Laboratory301 Braddock = RoadFrostburg, MD 21532 Hi Ladies and Gentlemen,I am getting the = following results from my HSPF calibration runs:1. Calculated peak flows = are ahead of the observed. The calculated peaksare occuring in Winter and = the observed peaks between April and May; whichis the snow melt period in = the watershed.2. As a result of the above my winter flow volume errors are = far greaterthan for the summer flows.3. Flow volume error for the = simulation period is however less than 5%.4. Very poor correlation = coefficient; less than 0.1.What I have done:1. increased UZSN in all land = use categories except agriculture; to themaximum limit in BASINS Tec. Note = #6;2. recalculated slopes of subwatersheds; input lesser slopes;3. = increased the length of overland flow plains;4. increased Manning's = overland flow coefficient.After doing all the above the peaks of my = computed hydrograph are stilloccuring in Winter.I wonder if anyone could = suggest any futher actions that would help.Thanks in advance.G.A. Sillah = Kargbo, PhD, P.Eng.Water Resources Engineer, Source Protection PlanningLake= Simcoe Region Conservation Authority120 Bayview ParwayNewmarket, Ontario = L3Y 3W3Tel: (905) 967-0112 ext 309Fax: (905) 967-1265E-mail: s.kargbo@lsrca= .on.ca ------------------------------------------You are currently = subscribed to the basinsinfo listserver.To unsubscribe, send the words = unsubscribe basinsinfo tolyris@lists.epa.gov OR:Use the listserver's web = interface athttps://lists.epa.gov/cgi-bin/lyris.pl to manage yoursubscripti= on.ORContact the basinsinfo listserver owner at basinsinfo-Owner@lists.epa.= gov ------------------------------------------ Joseph FerrariFaculty = Research AssistantUMCES Appalachian Laboratory301 Braddock RoadFrostburg, = MD 21532------------------------------------------You are currently = subscribed to the basinsinfo listserver. To unsubscribe, send the words = unsubscribe basinsinfo to lyris@lists.epa.gov OR:Use the listserver's web = interface at https://lists.epa.gov/cgi-bin/lyris.pl to manage your = subscription.ORContact the basinsinfo listserver owner at basinsinfo-Owner@= lists.epa.gov -------------------------------------------------------------= -----------------------You are currently subscribed to the basinsinfo = listserver. To unsubscribe, send the words unsubscribe basinsinfo to = lyris@lists.epa.govOR:Use the listserver's web interface at https://lists.e= pa.gov/cgi-bin/lyris.pl to manage your subscription.ORContact the = basinsinfo listserver owner at basinsinfo-Owner@lists.epa.gov--------------= ---------------------------- =20 -- Tony DonigianAQUA TERRA Consultants2685 Marine Way, Suite 1314Mountain = View, CA 94043-1115650-962-1864; fax 650-962-0706--------------------------= ----------------=20 You are currently subscribed to the basinsinfo listserver.=20 To unsubscribe, send the words unsubscribe basinsinfo to lyris@lists.epa.go= v=20 OR:=20 Use the listserver's web interface at https://lists.epa.gov/cgi-bin/lyris.p= l to manage your=20 subscription.=20 OR=20 Contact the basinsinfo listserver owner at basinsinfo-Owner@lists.epa.gov= =20 ------------------------------------------=20 ----------------------------------------------------------- X-Message-Number: 19 X-lyris-Id: 150235 Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 09:47:18 -0500 From: kylehall@vt.edu Subject: Zero Decay of a Dissolved General WQ constituent My apologies for the duplicate email... I am simulating fecal coliform bacteria in a small upland watershed using HSPF. It is my understanding that DDQAL is the general decay of the dissolved water quality constituent (I have specified a general first order decay only). I have summed hourly values of DDQAL at the watershed outlet. In some instances, I have found DDQAL returns a zero value for the day. I would like to know if anyone has run across this scenario. I have checked/output the water temp (TW), and volume (VOL) in an effort to check EQNS 21, 22, and 23 in the HSPF manual under "Decay of Dissolved Material - DDECAY." Could I be misinterpreting this variable? Is it possible for HSPF to calculate zero decay of the water quality constituent? Thank you in advance for any information. Kyle Hall Graduate Research Assistant Biological Systems Engineering Virginia Tech ----------------------------------------------------------- X-Message-Number: 20 X-lyris-Id: 150239 Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 09:49:25 -0600 From: "Rebecca Reeves" Subject: Approval and Training Can anyone provide an estimate of when Basins release 4 will be the primary version supported by EPA?=20 Is any training on release 4 been scheduled, or is all the training still being done on release 3.1.=20 At this time, I only see Basins 3.1 training, lectures, data sets and exercises on the web. (http://www.epa.gov/waterscience/basins/training.htm)=20 Rebecca S. Reeves ----------------------------------------------------------- X-Message-Number: 21 X-lyris-Id: 150273 Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 14:38:02 -0500 From: Partington.Ed@epamail.epa.gov Subject: BASINS 4 and Training We are currently testing BASINS 4 beta with an expected release soon. BASINS 4 will run on an open source GIS software called MapWindow (www.mapwindow.com). This first version will only have the HSPF and PLOAD models available. We will have to continue to support BASINS 3.1 for the SWAT and AGWA models for several more months until resources become available. This opensource GIS will read shapefiles and TIFF images so you can share data between ArcGIS and BASINS. If you would like to try the beta version then download it from http://hspf.com/ftp/basins4/ We are currently reviewing the BASINS 4 training lectures and exercises. After BASINS 4 is released then we will release the training materials. The BASINS 4 training is the same as BASINS 3 training except for the first two exercises which use the new GIS interface. The remanding 13 exercises are the same which involve the HSPF model and the utilities. Depending on resources we hope to have one BASINS 4 - HSPF workshop before September. EPA/OW/OST/SHPD/RSTSSB/BASINS Rebecca Reeves To Private list for BASINS users 01/16/2007 10:49 AM cc Subject Please respond [basinsinfo] Approval and to Training Private list for BASINS users Can anyone provide an estimate of when Basins release 4 will be the primary version supported by EPA? Is any training on release 4 been scheduled, or is all the training still being done on release 3.1. At this time, I only see Basins 3.1 training, lectures, data sets and exercises on the web. (http://www.epa.gov/waterscience/basins/training.htm) Rebecca S. Reeves ------------------------------------------ You are currently subscribed to the basinsinfo listserver. To unsubscribe, send the words unsubscribe basinsinfo to lyris@lists.epa.gov OR: Use the listserver's web interface at https://lists.epa.gov/cgi-bin/lyris.pl to manage your subscription. OR Contact the basinsinfo listserver owner at basinsinfo-Owner@lists.epa.gov ------------------------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------------- X-Message-Number: 22 X-lyris-Id: 150298 Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 10:21:29 -0500 From: kylehall@vt.edu Subject: Zero Decay of a Dissolved General WQ constituent - NEW INFO As a follow-up to my previous post... Based on my investigation of the subroutine DDECAY I began to look at section HTRCH for water temperature. I noticed a relationship between the Zero Decay phenomenon and ZERO HEAT EXCHANGE for the Atmosphere/Bed Heat Balance Components. In the HSPF users manual, the last paragraph of "Heat Exchange and Water Temperature - HTRCH" reads: "The heat exchange calculations do not give realistic results when the water body becomes excessively shallow. Consequently, heat transport processes are not considered if the average depth of water in the RCHRES falls below 2 inches. When this happens, the water temperature is set equal to the air temperature." I compared the hourly AVEDEP and hourly DDQAL values and found a strong relationship between the Zero Decay and AVDEP < 2 inches. However, I am unable to find a explicit connection between DDQAL and AVDEP (Such as the one mentioned in the HTRCH section above). Does anyone know of an explicit connection between DDQAL and AVDEP? OR, Is there a connection between DDQAL and some parameter in HTRCH that is being turned off below the 2 inch depth as specified in the HSPF users manual? Thank you in advance for any assistance. Kyle Hall Graduate Reseach Assistant Biological Systems Engineering Virginia Tech ----------------------------------------------------------- X-Message-Number: 23 X-lyris-Id: 150309 Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 08:56:36 -0800 From: Brian Bicknell Subject: Re: Zero Decay of a Dissolved General WQ constituent - NEW INFO Kyle, All of the water quality processes in RCHRES (including decay of dissolved constituents) stop when the average depth goes below 2 inches. While the depth is below this threshold, only transport is modeled. -Brian Bicknell kylehall@vt.edu wrote: > >As a follow-up to my previous post... > >Based on my investigation of the subroutine DDECAY I began to look at section >HTRCH for water temperature. I noticed a relationship between the Zero Decay >phenomenon and ZERO HEAT EXCHANGE for the Atmosphere/Bed Heat Balance >Components. In the HSPF users manual, the last paragraph of "Heat Exchange and >Water Temperature - HTRCH" reads: > >"The heat exchange calculations do not give realistic results when the water >body becomes excessively shallow. Consequently, heat transport processes are >not considered if the average depth of water in the RCHRES falls below 2 >inches. When this happens, the water temperature is set equal to the air >temperature." > >I compared the hourly AVEDEP and hourly DDQAL values and found a strong >relationship between the Zero Decay and AVDEP < 2 inches. However, I am unable >to find a explicit connection between DDQAL and AVDEP (Such as the one mentioned >in the HTRCH section above). > >Does anyone know of an explicit connection between DDQAL and AVDEP? OR, Is >there a connection between DDQAL and some parameter in HTRCH that is being >turned off below the 2 inch depth as specified in the HSPF users manual? > >Thank you in advance for any assistance. > >Kyle Hall >Graduate Reseach Assistant >Biological Systems Engineering >Virginia Tech > >------------------------------------------ >You are currently subscribed to the basinsinfo listserver. > >To unsubscribe, send the words unsubscribe basinsinfo to lyris@lists.epa.gov >OR: >Use the listserver's web interface at https://lists.epa.gov/cgi-bin/lyris.pl to manage your >subscription. >OR >Contact the basinsinfo listserver owner at basinsinfo-Owner@lists.epa.gov >------------------------------------------ > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------- X-Message-Number: 24 X-lyris-Id: 150364 Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 07:52:37 -0500 From: Kinerson.Russell@epamail.epa.gov Subject: Re: Approval and Training Rebecca, I'm glad you asked. We anticipate releasing BASINS 4.0 in the next two months (Feb or March). The last two BASINS/HSPF training courses have been conducted with Beta versions of BASINS 4.0. I apologize if the newly developed training materials haven't been uploaded to the BASINS site. I'll follow-up on that omission this morning. You can anticipate another BASINS/HSPF training workshop in the spring of 07, most likely in California. A second workshop will follow later in the year. If people have preferences, please make them know to the BASINS Team at EPA. Russ Russell Kinerson, Ph.D. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (4305T) 1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW Washington, DC 20460 Phone: (202) 566-0392; FAX: (202) 566- 0409 Mail: 1200 Pennsylvania Ave NW (4305T), Washington, DC 20460 Delivery: 1301 Constitution Ave NW (4305T), EPA West Room 6210 PP, Washington, DC 20460 Rebecca Reeves To Private list for BASINS users 01/16/2007 10:49 AM cc Subject Please respond [basinsinfo] Approval and to Training Private list for BASINS users Can anyone provide an estimate of when Basins release 4 will be the primary version supported by EPA? Is any training on release 4 been scheduled, or is all the training still being done on release 3.1. At this time, I only see Basins 3.1 training, lectures, data sets and exercises on the web. (http://www.epa.gov/waterscience/basins/training.htm) Rebecca S. Reeves ------------------------------------------ You are currently subscribed to the basinsinfo listserver. To unsubscribe, send the words unsubscribe basinsinfo to lyris@lists.epa.gov OR: Use the listserver's web interface at https://lists.epa.gov/cgi-bin/lyris.pl to manage your subscription. OR Contact the basinsinfo listserver owner at basinsinfo-Owner@lists.epa.gov ------------------------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------------- X-Message-Number: 25 X-lyris-Id: 150505 Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 14:26:30 -0500 From: "Yi Zhang" Subject: Platform of Basin 4.0 Hi Russell, Will BASIN 4.0 use ArcGIS 9 arcview as platform? Thanks. Yi Zhang, Ph.D. Georgia Environmental Protection Division Phone:(404)657-8807 >>> Kinerson.Russell@epamail.epa.gov 1/18/2007 7:52 am >>> Rebecca, I'm glad you asked. We anticipate releasing BASINS 4.0 in the next two months (Feb or March). The last two BASINS/HSPF training courses have been conducted with Beta versions of BASINS 4.0. I apologize if the newly developed training materials haven't been uploaded to the BASINS site. I'll follow-up on that omission this morning. You can anticipate another BASINS/HSPF training workshop in the spring of 07, most likely in California. A second workshop will follow later in the year. If people have preferences, please make them know to the BASINS Team at EPA. Russ Russell Kinerson, Ph.D. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (4305T) 1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW Washington, DC 20460 Phone: (202) 566-0392; FAX: (202) 566- 0409 Mail: 1200 Pennsylvania Ave NW (4305T), Washington, DC 20460 Delivery: 1301 Constitution Ave NW (4305T), EPA West Room 6210 PP, Washington, DC 20460 Rebecca Reeves To Private list for BASINS users 01/16/2007 10:49 AM cc Subject Please respond [basinsinfo] Approval and to Training Private list for BASINS users Can anyone provide an estimate of when Basins release 4 will be the primary version supported by EPA? Is any training on release 4 been scheduled, or is all the training still being done on release 3.1. At this time, I only see Basins 3.1 training, lectures, data sets and exercises on the web. (http://www.epa.gov/waterscience/basins/training.htm) Rebecca S. Reeves ------------------------------------------ You are currently subscribed to the basinsinfo listserver. To unsubscribe, send the words unsubscribe basinsinfo to lyris@lists.epa.gov OR: Use the listserver's web interface at https://lists.epa.gov/cgi-bin/lyris.pl to manage your subscription. OR Contact the basinsinfo listserver owner at basinsinfo-Owner@lists.epa.gov ------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------ You are currently subscribed to the basinsinfo listserver. To unsubscribe, send the words unsubscribe basinsinfo to lyris@lists.epa.gov OR: Use the listserver's web interface at https://lists.epa.gov/cgi-bin/lyris.pl to manage your subscription. OR Contact the basinsinfo listserver owner at basinsinfo-Owner@lists.epa.gov ------------------------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------------- X-Message-Number: 26 X-lyris-Id: 150529 Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 06:36:56 -0500 From: Kinerson.Russell@epamail.epa.gov Subject: Re: Platform of Basin 4.0 BASINS 4.0 is based on a non-proprietary, open-source GIS foundation. By using open-source GIS tools and non-proprietary data formats, the core of BASINS becomes independent of any proprietary GIS platform while still accommodating users of several different GIS software platforms. For instance, watersheds delineated with ArcGIS 9 can be used with BASINS. The open-source GIS tool, MapWindow, was chosen for use in BASINS 4.0 because (1) it is fully extensible using a plug-in extension interface, (2) it has an active and supportive international developer community, and (3) it supports both vector and raster data manipulation in most common file formats. We anticipate that the use of open source software will provide BASINS with a somewhat greater stability and transparency because the source code for all components - including the foundational GIS software - will always be available to end users. Russell Kinerson, Ph.D. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (4305T) 1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW Washington, DC 20460 Phone: (202) 566-0392; FAX: (202) 566- 0409 Mail: 1200 Pennsylvania Ave NW (4305T), Washington, DC 20460 Delivery: 1301 Constitution Ave NW (4305T), EPA West Room 6210 PP, Washington, DC 20460 Yi Zhang To Private list for BASINS users 01/19/2007 02:26 PM cc Subject Please respond [basinsinfo] Platform of Basin to 4.0 Private list for BASINS users Hi Russell, Will BASIN 4.0 use ArcGIS 9 arcview as platform? Thanks. Yi Zhang, Ph.D. Georgia Environmental Protection Division Phone:(404)657-8807 >>> Kinerson.Russell@epamail.epa.gov 1/18/2007 7:52 am >>> Rebecca, I'm glad you asked. We anticipate releasing BASINS 4.0 in the next two months (Feb or March). The last two BASINS/HSPF training courses have been conducted with Beta versions of BASINS 4.0. I apologize if the newly developed training materials haven't been uploaded to the BASINS site. I'll follow-up on that omission this morning. You can anticipate another BASINS/HSPF training workshop in the spring of 07, most likely in California. A second workshop will follow later in the year. If people have preferences, please make them know to the BASINS Team at EPA. Russ Russell Kinerson, Ph.D. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (4305T) 1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW Washington, DC 20460 Phone: (202) 566-0392; FAX: (202) 566- 0409 Mail: 1200 Pennsylvania Ave NW (4305T), Washington, DC 20460 Delivery: 1301 Constitution Ave NW (4305T), EPA West Room 6210 PP, Washington, DC 20460 Rebecca Reeves To Private list for BASINS users 01/16/2007 10:49 AM cc Subject Please respond [basinsinfo] Approval and to Training Private list for BASINS users Can anyone provide an estimate of when Basins release 4 will be the primary version supported by EPA? Is any training on release 4 been scheduled, or is all the training still being done on release 3.1. At this time, I only see Basins 3.1 training, lectures, data sets and exercises on the web. (http://www.epa.gov/waterscience/basins/training.htm) Rebecca S. Reeves ------------------------------------------ You are currently subscribed to the basinsinfo listserver. To unsubscribe, send the words unsubscribe basinsinfo to lyris@lists.epa.gov OR: Use the listserver's web interface at https://lists.epa.gov/cgi-bin/lyris.pl to manage your subscription. OR Contact the basinsinfo listserver owner at basinsinfo-Owner@lists.epa.gov ------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------ You are currently subscribed to the basinsinfo listserver. To unsubscribe, send the words unsubscribe basinsinfo to lyris@lists.epa.gov OR: Use the listserver's web interface at https://lists.epa.gov/cgi-bin/lyris.pl to manage your subscription. OR Contact the basinsinfo listserver owner at basinsinfo-Owner@lists.epa.gov ------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------ You are currently subscribed to the basinsinfo listserver. To unsubscribe, send the words unsubscribe basinsinfo to lyris@lists.epa.gov OR: Use the listserver's web interface at https://lists.epa.gov/cgi-bin/lyris.pl to manage your subscription. OR Contact the basinsinfo listserver owner at basinsinfo-Owner@lists.epa.gov ------------------------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------------- X-Message-Number: 27 X-lyris-Id: 150540 Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 09:45:53 -0600 From: kasey-hutchinson@uiowa.edu Subject: Clipping DEM I am trying to clip the HUC 8 watershed that I currently have set up in BASINS to a HUC 10 located within it. I have tried clipping the DEM to the HUC 10, but this results in the DEM becoming very pixelated. Any suggestions? Thanks so much in advance for your help! Kasey Hutchinson ----------------------------------------------------------- X-Message-Number: 28 X-lyris-Id: 150543 Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 08:10:52 -0800 (PST) From: Jessica Watts Subject: Re: Clipping DEM --0-910081473-1169482252=:81066 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Kasey,=0A =0AThe way I have dealt with this in the past is to create a rast= er from a shapefile of the area that you are trying to create with the grid= size you want. All the grid cells should be assigned either 0 or 1. You = then use the raster calculator to either add or multiply the two grids toge= ther. You then have the DEM of only the section you want. This is a rathe= r long process, but it is what I do.=0A =0AJessica Watts=0A=0A=0A----- Orig= inal Message ----=0AFrom: "kasey-hutchinson@uiowa.edu" =0ATo: Private list for BASINS users =0AS= ent: Monday, January 22, 2007 9:45:53 AM=0ASubject: [basinsinfo] Clipping D= EM=0A=0A=0AI am trying to clip the HUC 8 watershed that I currently have se= t up =0Ain BASINS to a HUC 10 located within it. I have tried clipping th= e =0ADEM to the HUC 10, but this results in the DEM becoming very =0Apixe= lated. Any suggestions? Thanks so much in advance for your help!=0A=0AKas= ey Hutchinson=0A=0A=0A------------------------------------------=0AYou are = currently subscribed to the basinsinfo listserver. =0A=0ATo unsubscribe, se= nd the words unsubscribe basinsinfo to lyris@lists.epa.gov=0AOR:=0AUse the = listserver's web interface at https://lists.epa.gov/cgi-bin/lyris.pl to man= age your =0Asubscription.=0AOR=0AContact the basinsinfo listserver owner at= basinsinfo-Owner@lists.epa.gov=0A-----------------------------------------= - --0-910081473-1169482252=:81066 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Kasey,
=0A
 
=0A
The way I have dealt with this in t= he past is to create a raster from a shapefile of the area that you are try= ing to create with the grid size you want.  All the grid cells should = be assigned either 0 or 1.  You then use the raster calculator to eith= er add or multiply the two grids together.  You then have the DEM= of only the section you want.  This is a rather long process, but it = is what I do.
=0A
 
=0A
Jessica Watts

=0A
----- Original Message ----
From: "kasey-hutchinson@uiowa.edu" <k= asey-hutchinson@uiowa.edu>
To: Private list for BASINS users <basi= nsinfo@lists.epa.gov>
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 9:45:53 AM
Su= bject: [basinsinfo] Clipping DEM

=0A
I am trying to clip the HUC= 8 watershed that I currently have set up  
in BASINS to a HUC= 10 located within it.  I have tried clipping the  
= DEM to the HUC 10, but this results in the DEM becoming very  pixelated.  Any suggestions?  Thanks so much in advanc= e for your help!

Kasey Hutchinson


-----------------------= -------------------
You are currently subscribed to the basinsinfo lists= erver.

To unsubscribe, send the words unsubscribe basinsinfo to lyr= is@lists.epa.gov
OR:
Use the listserver's web interface at https://lists.epa.= gov/cgi-bin/lyris.pl to manage your
subscription.
OR
Contact = the basinsinfo listserver owner at basinsinfo-Owner@lists.epa.gov
------= ------------------------------------
=0A

= --0-910081473-1169482252=:81066-- ----------------------------------------------------------- X-Message-Number: 29 X-lyris-Id: 150548 Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 11:46:49 -0500 From: Peter Subject: RE: Clipping DEM This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --Boundary_(ID_3bDigLpDKn5YtvV3av0hDQ) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Hell there, For manipulation of DEM data, I have found Global Mapper very useful. http://www.globalmapper.com/ I have used it for the past 6 years. As an international consultant, I never leave home without it. The cost is less than USD300. It used to be USD199. Although I have never clipped a HUC, if HUC is in one of the commonly used DEM format, you should be able to import into Global Mapper and select your region you want and create a new DEM file. I believe they also have a DEMO version available. BTW, GM can also re-project shapefiles. Good luck! Peter _____ From: Jessica Watts [mailto:patiencehoney@yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 11:11 AM To: Private list for BASINS users Subject: Re: [basinsinfo] Clipping DEM Kasey, The way I have dealt with this in the past is to create a raster from a shapefile of the area that you are trying to create with the grid size you want. All the grid cells should be assigned either 0 or 1. You then use the raster calculator to either add or multiply the two grids together. You then have the DEM of only the section you want. This is a rather long process, but it is what I do. Jessica Watts ----- Original Message ---- From: "kasey-hutchinson@uiowa.edu" To: Private list for BASINS users Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 9:45:53 AM Subject: [basinsinfo] Clipping DEM I am trying to clip the HUC 8 watershed that I currently have set up in BASINS to a HUC 10 located within it. I have tried clipping the DEM to the HUC 10, but this results in the DEM becoming very pixelated. Any suggestions? Thanks so much in advance for your help! Kasey Hutchinson ------------------------------------------ You are currently subscribed to the basinsinfo listserver. To unsubscribe, send the words unsubscribe basinsinfo to lyris@lists.epa.gov OR: Use the listserver's web interface at https://lists.epa.gov/cgi-bin/lyris.pl to manage your subscription. OR Contact the basinsinfo listserver owner at basinsinfo-Owner@lists.epa.gov ------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------ You are currently subscribed to the basinsinfo listserver. To unsubscribe, send the words unsubscribe basinsinfo to lyris@lists.epa.gov OR: Use the listserver's web interface at https://lists.epa.gov/cgi-bin/lyris.pl to manage your subscription. OR Contact the basinsinfo listserver owner at basinsinfo-Owner@lists.epa.gov ------------------------------------------ --Boundary_(ID_3bDigLpDKn5YtvV3av0hDQ) Content-type: text/html; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Hell there,
 
For manipulation of DEM data, I have found Global Mapper very useful. http://www.globalmapper.com/ I have used it for the past 6 years. As an international consultant, I never leave home without it. The cost is less than USD300. It used to be USD199.
 
Although I have never clipped a HUC, if HUC is in one of the commonly used DEM format, you should be able to import into Global Mapper and select your region you want and create a new DEM file. I believe they also have a DEMO version available. BTW, GM can also re-project shapefiles.
 
Good luck!
Peter


From: Jessica Watts [mailto:patiencehoney@yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 11:11 AM
To: Private list for BASINS users
Subject: Re: [basinsinfo] Clipping DEM

Kasey,
 
The way I have dealt with this in the past is to create a raster from a shapefile of the area that you are trying to create with the grid size you want.  All the grid cells should be assigned either 0 or 1.  You then use the raster calculator to either add or multiply the two grids together.  You then have the DEM of only the section you want.  This is a rather long process, but it is what I do.
 
Jessica Watts

----- Original Message ----
From: "kasey-hutchinson@uiowa.edu" <kasey-hutchinson@uiowa.edu>
To: Private list for BASINS users <basinsinfo@lists.epa.gov>
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 9:45:53 AM
Subject: [basinsinfo] Clipping DEM

I am trying to clip the HUC 8 watershed that I currently have set up  
in BASINS to a HUC 10 located within it.  I have tried clipping the  
DEM to the HUC 10, but this results in the DEM becoming very  
pixelated.  Any suggestions?  Thanks so much in advance for your help!

Kasey Hutchinson


------------------------------------------
You are currently subscribed to the basinsinfo listserver.

To unsubscribe, send the words unsubscribe basinsinfo to lyris@lists.epa.gov
OR:
Use the listserver's web interface at https://lists.epa.gov/cgi-bin/lyris.pl to manage your
subscription.
OR
Contact the basinsinfo listserver owner at basinsinfo-Owner@lists.epa.gov
------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------
You are currently subscribed to the basinsinfo listserver.

To unsubscribe, send the words unsubscribe basinsinfo to lyris@lists.epa.gov
OR:
Use the listserver's web interface at https://lists.epa.gov/cgi-bin/lyris.pl to manage your
subscription.
OR
Contact the basinsinfo listserver owner at basinsinfo-Owner@lists.epa.gov
------------------------------------------ --Boundary_(ID_3bDigLpDKn5YtvV3av0hDQ)-- ----------------------------------------------------------- X-Message-Number: 30 X-lyris-Id: 150550 Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 11:52:44 -0500 From: Carleton.Jim@epamail.epa.gov Subject: Re: Clipping DEM Kasey, I have an ArcView extension called "milagrid" on my machine (in the ext32 directory) that includes a polygon clipping function for raster data, which has worked well for me in doing grid clipping. Seems to me this was a freebie that I found online (at ESRI's web site?) a couple of years ago. kasey-hutchinson @uiowa.edu To 01/22/2007 10:45 Private list for BASINS users AM cc Please respond Subject to [basinsinfo] Clipping DEM Private list for BASINS users I am trying to clip the HUC 8 watershed that I currently have set up in BASINS to a HUC 10 located within it. I have tried clipping the DEM to the HUC 10, but this results in the DEM becoming very pixelated. Any suggestions? Thanks so much in advance for your help! Kasey Hutchinson ------------------------------------------ You are currently subscribed to the basinsinfo listserver. To unsubscribe, send the words unsubscribe basinsinfo to lyris@lists.epa.gov OR: Use the listserver's web interface at https://lists.epa.gov/cgi-bin/lyris.pl to manage your subscription. OR Contact the basinsinfo listserver owner at basinsinfo-Owner@lists.epa.gov ------------------------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------------- X-Message-Number: 31 X-lyris-Id: 150578 Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 10:06:01 -0700 From: "Jason T. Love" Subject: RE: Clipping DEM What is the output resolution of the clipped grid? This should be an argument for the geoprocessing option regardless of the GIS you are using. Make sure it is set as you expect, e.g., Same as Input. -----Original Message----- From: Carleton.Jim@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Carleton.Jim@epamail.epa.gov] Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 9:53 AM To: Private list for BASINS users Subject: Re: [basinsinfo] Clipping DEM Kasey, I have an ArcView extension called "milagrid" on my machine (in the ext32 directory) that includes a polygon clipping function for raster data, which has worked well for me in doing grid clipping. Seems to me this was a freebie that I found online (at ESRI's web site?) a couple of years ago. =20 kasey-hutchinson =20 @uiowa.edu =20 To=20 01/22/2007 10:45 Private list for BASINS users =20 AM =20 cc=20 =20 Please respond Subject=20 to [basinsinfo] Clipping DEM =20 Private list for =20 BASINS users =20 =20 =20 =20 I am trying to clip the HUC 8 watershed that I currently have set up in BASINS to a HUC 10 located within it. I have tried clipping the DEM to the HUC 10, but this results in the DEM becoming very pixelated. Any suggestions? Thanks so much in advance for your help! Kasey Hutchinson ------------------------------------------ You are currently subscribed to the basinsinfo listserver. To unsubscribe, send the words unsubscribe basinsinfo to lyris@lists.epa.gov OR: Use the listserver's web interface at https://lists.epa.gov/cgi-bin/lyris.pl to manage your subscription. OR Contact the basinsinfo listserver owner at basinsinfo-Owner@lists.epa.gov ------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------ You are currently subscribed to the basinsinfo listserver.=20 To unsubscribe, send the words unsubscribe basinsinfo to lyris@lists.epa.gov OR: Use the listserver's web interface at https://lists.epa.gov/cgi-bin/lyris.pl to manage your=20 subscription. OR Contact the basinsinfo listserver owner at basinsinfo-Owner@lists.epa.gov ------------------------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------------- X-Message-Number: 32 X-lyris-Id: 150587 Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 10:14:01 -0800 From: Driss Ennaanay Subject: Re: Clipping DEM Hi There is an extension in the ESRI website called: Grid Analysis (free) that has so many utilities. Go to ESRI web site, type in the search bar: grid analysis, download it, save it in ext32 (extensions folder), open Arc View, under file, click on extensions, scroll down you will find it: Grid Analysis, make it active and it is ready to go. I tried it so many times and it works fine. Hope this helps. Driss Carleton.Jim@epamail.epa.gov wrote: > Kasey, > > I have an ArcView extension called "milagrid" on my machine (in the > ext32 directory) that includes a polygon clipping function for raster > data, which has worked well for me in doing grid clipping. Seems to me > this was a freebie that I found online (at ESRI's web site?) a couple of > years ago. > > > > > kasey-hutchinson > @uiowa.edu > To > 01/22/2007 10:45 Private list for BASINS users > AM > cc > > Please respond Subject > to [basinsinfo] Clipping DEM > Private list for > BASINS users > s.epa.gov> > > > > > > > I am trying to clip the HUC 8 watershed that I currently have set up > in BASINS to a HUC 10 located within it. I have tried clipping the > DEM to the HUC 10, but this results in the DEM becoming very > pixelated. Any suggestions? Thanks so much in advance for your help! > > Kasey Hutchinson > > > ------------------------------------------ > You are currently subscribed to the basinsinfo listserver. > > To unsubscribe, send the words unsubscribe basinsinfo to > lyris@lists.epa.gov > OR: > Use the listserver's web interface at > https://lists.epa.gov/cgi-bin/lyris.pl to manage your > subscription. > OR > Contact the basinsinfo listserver owner at > basinsinfo-Owner@lists.epa.gov > ------------------------------------------ > > > > ------------------------------------------ > You are currently subscribed to the basinsinfo listserver. > > To unsubscribe, send the words unsubscribe basinsinfo to lyris@lists.epa.gov > OR: > Use the listserver's web interface at https://lists.epa.gov/cgi-bin/lyris.pl to manage your > subscription. > OR > Contact the basinsinfo listserver owner at basinsinfo-Owner@lists.epa.gov > ------------------------------------------ > > > -- Driss Ennaanay, Ph.D. AQUA TERRA Consultants 2685 Marine Way, Suite 1314 Mountain View, CA 94043 Ph: (650) 962-1864 ----------------------------------------------------------- X-Message-Number: 33 X-lyris-Id: 150601 Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 18:35:08 -0500 From: "Sillah Kargbo" Subject: Automatic Watershed Delineation - BASINS4 Hellow BASINS users in transition: I completed the watershed delineation with tyhe automatic delineation = option. I have set my minimum accumulation area. In version 3 the program = will automatically generate outlets, which could be removed with outlet = erase button but I do not see this in version 4. So I do not know how to = aggregate all these smaller generated subcatchments, which I do not need. = I just want to have drainage boundries to the outlets I want to simulate. = Please let know how to do this. My regards, G.A. Sillah Kargbo, PhD, P.Eng. Water Resources Engineer, Source Protection Planning Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority 120 Bayview Parway Newmarket, Ontario L3Y 3W3 Tel: (905) 967-0112 ext 309 Fax: (905) 967-1265 E-mail: s.kargbo@lsrca.on.ca ----------------------------------------------------------- X-Message-Number: 34 X-lyris-Id: 150602 Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 18:54:48 -0700 From: "Daniel P. Ames" Subject: Re: Automatic Watershed Delineation - BASINS4 Hi all, In version 4 automatic watershed delineation (AWD) you use the "select outlets" function to select outlets you want to use (rather than delete the ones you don't want). However, in the version that you are using, selecting outlets makes new at those points, but it does not aggregate upstream watersheds. A new update to this function was just built, but hasn't been fully tested. This newer version of AWD will aggregate watersheds to the selected outlets. You are welcome to try it if you would like (with the disclaimer that this is just a test version). You can download the pertinent file here: http://svn.mapwindow.org/svnroot/MapWindow4Dev/Bin/Plugins/watershed_delin/mwTau demBasinsWrapper.dll and copy it to your BASINS\bin\plugins\watershed_delin folder (replace the existing one after making a backup copy of it). Thanks, Dan --------------------------------------------- Daniel P. Ames, PhD, PE Department of Geosciences Geospatial Software Lab Idaho State University Idaho Falls Campus http://www.isu.edu/geology/ http://www.MapWindow.org/ --------------------------------------------- Sillah Kargbo wrote: >Hellow BASINS users in transition: > >I completed the watershed delineation with tyhe automatic delineation option. I have set my minimum accumulation area. In version 3 the program will automatically generate outlets, which could be removed with outlet erase button but I do not see this in version 4. So I do not know how to aggregate all these smaller generated subcatchments, which I do not need. I just want to have drainage boundries to the outlets I want to simulate. Please let know how to do this. > >My regards, > > > >G.A. Sillah Kargbo, PhD, P.Eng. >Water Resources Engineer, Source Protection Planning >Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority >120 Bayview Parway >Newmarket, Ontario L3Y 3W3 >Tel: (905) 967-0112 ext 309 >Fax: (905) 967-1265 >E-mail: s.kargbo@lsrca.on.ca > >------------------------------------------ >You are currently subscribed to the basinsinfo listserver. > >To unsubscribe, send the words unsubscribe basinsinfo to lyris@lists.epa.gov >OR: >Use the listserver's web interface at https://lists.epa.gov/cgi-bin/lyris.pl to manage your >subscription. >OR >Contact the basinsinfo listserver owner at basinsinfo-Owner@lists.epa.gov >------------------------------------------ > > > ----------------------------------------------------------- X-Message-Number: 35 X-lyris-Id: 150660 Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 15:46:17 -0600 From: "Rahim, Mustafa" Subject: Running Main Stem for Hydrology This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C73F37.E99DE123 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I have been trying to run main stem after running different tributary watersheds with default values, after creating uci I tried to run I got the following error messg.=20 Anybody have any idea? ************************************************************************ ************ * * * ERROR/WARNING ID: 211 26 * * * * There are more operations in the opn sequence block than can fit into * * table OPNTAB. Thus, this operation will not be entered in the table. * * * ************************************************************************ ************ Thanks Mustafa Rahim =20 ------_=_NextPart_001_01C73F37.E99DE123 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I have = been trying=20 to run main stem after running different tributary watersheds with = default=20 values, after creating uci I tried to run I got the following error = messg.=20
Anybody have=20 any idea?

**********************************************************************= **************

* *

* ERROR/WARNING ID: 211 26 *

* *

* There are more operations in the opn sequence block than can fit = into *

* table OPNTAB. Thus, this operation will not be entered in the = table. *

* *

**********************************************************************= **************

Thanks
Mustafa Rahim
 
------_=_NextPart_001_01C73F37.E99DE123-- ----------------------------------------------------------- X-Message-Number: 36 X-lyris-Id: 150665 Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 09:12:01 +1030 From: "Mosley, Luke \(EPA\)" Subject: Problem with web data download in BASINS4 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C73F3F.B3B790F9 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_002_01C73F3F.B3B790F9" ------_=_NextPart_002_01C73F3F.B3B790F9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi =20 I am a new user to BASINS (using BASINS4 beta version) and unfortunately have not had the benefit of attending a workshop yet. I am trying to run the tutorial as a starting point. Once I select the region in the tutorial and click 'Build' I get the following error message. Can anyone help me solve or get around this problem. I am running Windows XP over a network so not sure it is some problem there. =20 =20 =20 Best wishes luke Luke Mosley Senior Environmental Advisor Environment Protection Authority=20 Murraylands Office=20 Suite 2, 85 Mt. Barker Road, Stirling, SA 5152 E-mail: luke.mosley@epa.sa.gov.au Phone: (08) 8139 9915 Fax: (08) 8139 9901 =20 The information in this e-mail may be confidential and/or legally privileged. Use or disclosure of the information to anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited and maybe unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error please advise by return e-mail or by telephoning +61 8 8139 9915 =20 ------_=_NextPart_002_01C73F3F.B3B790F9 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi

 

I am a new user to BASINS (using BASINS4 beta = version) and unfortunately have not had the benefit of attending a workshop yet. I am trying to run = the tutorial as a starting point. Once I select the region in the tutorial = and click ‘Build’ I get the following error message. Can anyone = help me solve or get around this problem. I am running Windows XP over a network = so not sure it is some problem there.

 

 

Best wishes

luke

Luke Mosley
Senior Environmental Advisor
Environment Protection Authority

Murraylands = Office
Suite 2, 85 Mt. Barker = Road, Stirling, SA 5152

E-mail: luke.mosley@epa.sa.gov.au
Phone:  (08) = 8139 9915
Fax:    (08) 8139 = 9901     

The information in this e-mail may be confidential and/or legally privileged. Use or disclosure of the = information to anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited and maybe = unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error please advise by return e-mail or = by telephoning +61 8 8139 9915

 

------_=_NextPart_002_01C73F3F.B3B790F9-- ------_=_NextPart_001_01C73F3F.B3B790F9 Content-Type: image/jpeg; name="image001.jpg" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-ID: Content-Description: image001.jpg Content-Location: image001.jpg /9j/4AAQSkZJRgABAQEAYABgAAD/2wBDAAoHBwgHBgoICAgLCgoLDhgQDg0NDh0VFhEYIx8lJCIf IiEmKzcvJik0KSEiMEExNDk7Pj4+JS5ESUM8SDc9Pjv/2wBDAQoLCw4NDhwQEBw7KCIoOzs7Ozs7 Ozs7Ozs7Ozs7Ozs7Ozs7Ozs7Ozs7Ozs7Ozs7Ozs7Ozs7Ozs7Ozs7Ozs7Ozv/wAARCAFcAfwDASIA AhEBAxEB/8QAHwAAAQUBAQEBAQEAAAAAAAAAAAECAwQFBgcICQoL/8QAtRAAAgEDAwIEAwUFBAQA AAF9AQIDAAQRBRIhMUEGE1FhByJxFDKBkaEII0KxwRVS0fAkM2JyggkKFhcYGRolJicoKSo0NTY3 ODk6Q0RFRkdISUpTVFVWV1hZWmNkZWZnaGlqc3R1dnd4eXqDhIWGh4iJipKTlJWWl5iZmqKjpKWm p6ipqrKztLW2t7i5usLDxMXGx8jJytLT1NXW19jZ2uHi4+Tl5ufo6erx8vP09fb3+Pn6/8QAHwEA AwEBAQEBAQEBAQAAAAAAAAECAwQFBgcICQoL/8QAtREAAgECBAQDBAcFBAQAAQJ3AAECAxEEBSEx BhJBUQdhcRMiMoEIFEKRobHBCSMzUvAVYnLRChYkNOEl8RcYGRomJygpKjU2Nzg5OkNERUZHSElK U1RVVldYWVpjZGVmZ2hpanN0dXZ3eHl6goOEhYaHiImKkpOUlZaXmJmaoqOkpaanqKmqsrO0tba3 uLm6wsPExcbHyMnK0tPU1dbX2Nna4uPk5ebn6Onq8vP09fb3+Pn6/9oADAMBAAIRAxEAPwC7E0xk fCoUVFYYky33sMSv8KKvJc8dqzPEXir/AIR6CFza/aDMMqBJt4LMAeRnBVQw46MPrVPXPEM+k6vH ZRygI0KOsTgOrMXK5CMCuRgc9cfSuf1qK51eAQm4Zrh3DFpAf3hJPylu55HryPxqa+JxscVJcy5E 9tL2+6/z8zypTippSOy8N+IT4i057wW5t9kpjKb93QA5zgetam81h/DSwl0+0SKVkZjfBvkJIxhP 8K7q8xPZ6gokkndJxhXH+r+bHy9fp/SvapVuaEZb3NrRlrHYwd5o3mug1W3SC3tHaNmS1dUYEcMM A/0xTJt1xc2d1HcebbtcqFVlAaM5zjPp/wDWrRVbq4+RGFvNG810F/DDPDHA+Ekklm8uQ9iHPB9j mpZpUOo3Nqkxt7h5EKSbQQ3yAbTS9r5ByI5reaN5q7aM1prCM+NyS7WxwOuDW4lqkUkaHGbeVpm/ 3Tux/IVU6nKCimctvNG81rR6fb3MK3VxMY3uWdgS6qqYPcHk8+lSRWkV5YafbvvV3E2xlIwCDnkd 6HUSFymLvNG81o6PuRrxlJVhauQQeQeKnltDex2c0ijzGidpm3bcqvRicH+VNzs7MFFNGPvNG81t R6fZwTTDa0yNZGZCSOPpx19D+lQRaVG1mzysUm8gzKofOVHqMcfnR7SIcpmbzRvNaWnu8Ol6g8bs jjysEHB+8asXdjA7PdThk2wRvKkWAS7HB60OaTs/62DlVjF3mjea2jodv5rL5z7YpMTMSBhdu4H+ lNGiwLcwW0ryCSVn6EcKAcHp3wKXtYD5DH3mjea29PtIIr+wuId+2bzPlkIJGAR2qv8A2XB9m+/J 5/2b7Rnjbj0x1zR7RXsLlMzeaN5rTm0qOGxlkZitxCELpv3AbvwGPzNTy2kNnYajbxl2dBDvZiME k54Han7RdP62/wAw5TF3mjeaNtG2tLE6BvNG80baNtFg0DeaN5o20baLBoG80m80u2jbRYNBN5o3 ml20baLBoJvNG80u2jbRYNBN5o3ml20baLBoJvNG80u2jbRYNBN5o3ml20baLBoJvNG80u2jbRYN BN5o3ml20baLBoJvNG80u2jbRYNBN5o3ml20baLBoJvNG80u2jbRYNBN5o3ml20baLBoJvNG80u2 jbRYNBN5o3ml20baLBoJuPrRuPrS7aNtFg0E3H1o3H1pdtG2iwaCbj60bj60u2jbRYNBlzpWk6os P9o2EN00O7YZCwxuA9CM9B1/Sorjw7pU4AWEwrn5vLckkYwR8xPHfp3rsLLRNMfToJ5YBlold2Mj DtknrUn9maJs