![[logo] US EPA](http://www.epa.gov/epafiles/images/logo_epaseal.gif){kind=logo}
Conformity Adequacy Review - Region 9
Transportation
Conformity
- Main Transportation Conformity Page
- General Information
- Policy Guidance
- Training Materials
- Regulations
- Adequacy Review of SIP Submissions
- Regional Contacts
NOTE: You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader, available as a free download, to view some of the files on this page. See EPA's PDF page to learn more about PDF, and for a link to the free Acrobat Reader.
SIP Submissions that EPA has Found Adequate or Inadequate
Region 9: Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada, and
the territories of Guam and American Samoa
For more information about adequacy review, return to the main adequacy page.
Contacts: Karina O'Connor, at 775-833-1276
John J. Kelly, at 415-947-4151, or
Ginger Vagenas, at 415-972-3964 or R9.adequacy@epa.gov.
U.S. EPA Region 9, 75 Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA 94105
| Arizona | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Area | Pollutant | SIP Submission |
Finding (date budgets apply) |
Additional Information/ Comments |
| Bullhead City | PM10 | limited maintenance plan | Adequate (08/26/02) FR Notice | PDF version, (8 pp. 69K) |
Budgets found adequate through SIP approval process. |
| Payson City | PM10 | limited maintenance plan | Adequate (08/26/02) FR Notice | PDF version, (8 pp. 69K) |
Budgets found adequate through SIP approval process. |
| Pima County | carbon monoxide |
maintenance plan | Adequate (12/08/99) Letter 1 (PDF), (2 pp. 86K) and Letter 2 (PDF), (2 pp. 84K) FR Notice | PDF version, (2 pp. 21K) |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. |
| Phoenix (Maricopa and Pinal Counties) | PM10 | 5% plan | Adequate (07/01/08) Letter (PDF), (6 pp. 386K) FR Notice | PDF Version (2 pp. 85K) |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. |
| 8-hour ozone | attainment demonstration | Adequate (11/09/07) Letter (PDF), (6 pp. 95K) FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. | |
| PM10 | attainment demonstration | Adequate (04/21/00) Letter (PDF), ( 5 pp. 69K) FR Notice | PDF verson, (1 p. 11K) |
PM10 budget for Maricopa County applies to entire non-attainment area including Pinal County. Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. | |
| Inadequate (12/27/99) Letter (PDF), (5 pp. 997K) FR Notice | PDF version, (1 p. 73K) |
||||
| Phoenix (Maricopa County) | carbon monoxide |
maintenance plan | Adequate (10/14/03) Letter (PDF), (1 p. 23K) FR Notice | PDF version, ( 5 pp. 34K) |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. |
| attainment demonstration (serious area) | Adequate (11/01/01) Letter (PDF), ( 4 pp. 81K) FR Notice | PDF version, (1 p. 61K) |
Revision to budget from 12/14/99. Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. | ||
| Adequate (12/14/99) (Letter (PDF), (4 pp. 851K) FR Notice | PDF version, (1 p. 14K) |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. | |||
| attainment demonstration (moderate area) | Inadequate (05/05/99) |
Determination made under old process | ||
| 1-hour ozone | redesignation and maintenance plan | Adequate (09/01/04) (Letter (PDF), ( 6 pp. 191K) FR Notice | PDF version, (2 pp. 54K) |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. | |
| attainment demonstration and 15% | Inadequate (05/05/99) |
Determination made under old process | ||
| Yuma County | PM10 | maintenance plan | Adequate (06/27/07) Letter (PDF), (6 pp. 237K) FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. |
| attainment demonstration | Inadequate (11/16/99) (Letter (PDF), (2 pp. 59K) FR Notice | PDF version , (1 p. 13K) |
|||
| California | ||||
| Area | Pollutant | SIP Submission |
Finding (date budgets apply) |
Additional Information/ Comments |
Bakersfield Metropolitan Area |
carbon monoxide |
maintenance plan |
Adequate (01/30/06) FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through SIP approval process. |
Chico Urbanized Area |
carbon monoxide |
maintenance plan |
Adequate (01/30/06) FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through SIP approval process. |
| East Kern County | 1-hour ozone | maintenance plan | Adequate (06/21/04) FR Notice | PDF version, (3 pp. 43K) |
Budgets found adequate through SIP approval process. |
| Fresno Urbanized Area | carbon monoxide | maintenance plan | Adequate (01/30/06) FR Notice | Budgets found adequate through SIP approval process. |
| Imperial County | 8-hour ozone | early progress plan | Adequate
(05/20/08) Letter (PDF), (2pp. 56K) Enclosure (PDF), (3pp. 108K) FR Notice | PDF Version (1p. 67K) |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. |
| Indian Wells | PM10 | maintenance plan | Adequate (06/06/03) FR Notice | PDF version, (3pp. 43K) |
Budgets found adequate by virtue of SIP approval. |
| Lake Tahoe North Shore Area | carbon monoxide | maintenance plan | Adequate (01/30/06) FR Notice | Budgets found adequate through SIP approval process. |
| Lake Tahoe South Shore Area | carbon monoxide | maintenance plan | Adequate (01/30/06) FR Notice | Budgets found adequate through SIP approval process. |
| Los Angeles (Coachella) | PM10 | attainment demonstration | Adequate (03/11/04) Letter (PDF), (7 pp. 18K) FR Notice | PDF version, (2 pp. 54K) |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. |
| Adequate (04/18/03) Letter (PDF), (6 pp. 26K) FR Notice | PDF version, (2 pp. 32K) |
Budgets found adequate through SIP approval process. | |||
| Inadequate (01/04/00) Letter (PDF), (2pp. 324K) FR Notice | PDF version, (7 pp. 87K) |
||||
| Los Angeles - San Bernadino Counties (Western Mohave Desert) | 8-hour ozone | early progress plan | Adequate
(05/20/08) Letter (PDF), (3pp. 52K) Enclosure (PDF), (3pp. 113K) FR Notice | PDF Version (51pp. 67K) |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. |
| Modesto Urbanized Area | carbon monoxide | maintenance plan | Adequate (01/30/06) FR Notice | Budgets found adequate through SIP approval process. |
| Riverside County (Coachella Valley) | 8-hour ozone | early progress plan | Adequate
(05/22/08) Letter (PDF), (2pp. 61K) Enclosure (PDF), (3pp. 117K) FR Notice | PDF Version (1pp. 72K) |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. |
| Sacramento Metro Area | 8-hr ozone | reasonable further progress | Adequate
(03/29/06) Letter (PDF) (5 pp, 406K) FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. |
| Sacramento Urbanized Area | carbon monoxide | maintenance plan | Adequate (01/30/06) FR Notice | Budgets found adequate through SIP approval process. |
| San Bernardino County | PM10 | attainment demonstration | Inadequate (01/04/00) Letter (PDF), (2 pp. 406K) FR Notice | PDF version, (1 p. 117K) |
|
| San Diego Area | 8-hour ozone | attainment plan | Adequate
(06/09/08) Letter (PDF), (2 pp. 166K) FR Notice | PDF version (2 pp. 72K) |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. |
| carbon monoxide | maintenance plan | Adequate (01/30/06) FR Notice | Budgets found adequate through SIP approval process. | |
| 1-hour ozone | maintenance plan | Adequate (05/14/03) Letter (PDF), (5 pp. 170K) FR Notice | PDF version, (2 pp. 39K) |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. | |
| San Francisco Bay Area | carbon monoxide | maintenance plan | Adequate (01/30/06) FR Notice | Budgets found adequate through SIP approval process. |
| 1-hour ozone | attainment demonstration | Adequate (03/08/02) Letter (PDF), (45 pp. 159K) FR Notice | PDF version, (2 pp. 39K) |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. | |
| Inadequate (10/22/01) FR Notice | PDF version, (8 pp. 67K) |
Budgets inadequate by virtue of partial SIP disapproval | |||
| San Joaquin Valley | 1-hour ozone | attainment demonstration and rate of progress | Adequate (03/02/05) Letter (PDF), (11 pp. 62K) FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. |
| PM10 | attainment demonstration | Adequate (05/26/04) FR Notice | PDF version, (32 pp. 233K) |
Budgets found adequate through SIP approval process. | |
| 1-hour ozone | rate of progress (2002 and 2005) | Adequate (08/08/03) (Letter (PDF), (8 pp. 28K) FR Notice | PDF version, (2pp. 133K) |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. | |
| PM10 | attainment demonstration | Inadequate (05/05/99) |
Determination made under old process | |
| Santa Barbara | 1-hour ozone | maintenance plan | Adequate (07/09/03) Letter (PDF), (5 pp. 18K) FR Notice | PDF version, (3 pp. 43K) |
Budgets found adequate through SIP approval process. |
| attainment demonstration | Adequate (01/14/00) Letter (PDF), (8 pp. 539K) FR Notice | PDF version, 2 pp. 14K) |
Technical Support Document (PDF), <(span class="fileinfo">6 pp. 24K). Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. | ||
| Searles Valley | PM10 | attainment demonstration | Inadequate (01/04/00) Letter (PDF), (2 pp. 339K) FR Notice |
|
| South Coast | 8-hour ozone and PM2.5 | reasonable further progress, attainment plan, and out-year budgets | Adequate / Inadequate (05/30/08) Letter (PDF), (2 pp. 48K) Attachment (PDF), (18 pp. 72K) FR Notice | PDF version, (3 pp. 130K) |
Budgets found adequate / inadequate through the adequacy review process. |
| 1-hour ozone, CO, and PM10 | attainment demonstration | Adequate (03/11/04) Letter (PDF), 16 pp. 51K) FR Notice | PDF version, (2 pp. 54K) |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. | |
| nitrogen oxide | maintenance plan | Adequate (03/11/04) Letter (PDF), 16 pp. 51K) FR Notice | PDF version, (2 pp. 54K) |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. | |
| PM10 | attainment demonstration | Adequate (04/18/03) Letter (PDF), (4 pp. 25K) FR Notice | PDF version, 4 pp. 98K ) |
Budgets found adequate through SIP approval process. Budgets replace those posted on 06/24/99. | |
| Southeast Desert | 1-hour ozone | rate of progress and attainment demonstration | Adequate (06/14/04) Letter (PDF), (7 pp. 45K) FR Notice | PDF version, (2 pp. 54K) |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. |
| Stockton Urbanized Area | carbon monoxide> | maintenance plan> | Adequate (01/30/06) FR Notice | Budgets found adequate through SIP approval process. |
| Ventura | 8-hour ozone | early progress plan | Adequate
(05/20/08) Letter (PDF), (2pp. 57K) Enclosure (PDF), (3pp. 116K) FR Notice | PDF Version (53pp. 67K) |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. |
| 1-hour ozone | attainment demonstration | Adequate (06/14/04) Letter (PDF), (6 pp. 43K) FR Notice | PDF version, (2 pp. 54K) |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. | |
| Nevada | ||||
| Area | Pollutant | SIP Submission |
Finding (date budgets apply) |
Additional Information/ Comments |
| Lake Tahoe | carbon monoxide | limited maintenance plan | Adequate (02/13/04) FR Proposal | PDF version, 2 pp. 37K) FR Direct Final Rule | (PDF version, 8 pp. 67K) |
Budgets found adequate through SIP approval process. |
| Las Vegas (Clark County) |
PM10 | attainment demonstration | Adequate (1/26/02) Letter (PDF), (2 pp. 97K) FR Notice | PDF version, (1 p. 34KB/span>) |
Response to Comments (PDF), 24 pp. 585K) Adequacy Review Table (PDF), (4 pp. 133K). Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process |
| carbon monoxide |
attainment demonstration | Adequate (12/15/00) Letter (PDF), (7 pp. 505K) FR Notice | PDF version, (2 pp. 120K) |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. | |
| Inadequate (02/17/00) Letter (PDF), (5 pp. 84K) FR Notice |
||||
| Inadequate (05/05/99) |
Determination made under old process | |||
| PM10 | attainment demonstration | Inadequate (11/16/99) Letter (PDF), (2 pp. 56K) FR Notice | PDF version, 1p . 13K) |
||
| Truckee Meadows (Washoe County) | carbon monoxide | maintenance plan | Adequate (03/30/06) Letter (PDF), (10 pp, 340K) FR Notice | PDF version, 2 pp. 191K) |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. |