Tribal Water Plan - Appendix C

APPENDIX C: TRIBAL PROGRAM AACTIVITY MEASURES WITH
TARGETS: BREAKOUT BY EPA REGION
NATIONAL WATER PROGRAM
FY 2005 PROGRAM ACTIVITY MEASURES (PAMS) FOR TRIBES
WITH ANNUAL STRAW TARGETS BY EPA REGION
Water System Sanitary Surveys: Each year, all tribal community water systems will have undergone a
sanitary survey within the previous three years. (OGWDW)
2002 Baseline: n/a
2005 National Straw Target: 80%
2008 National Target: 100%
| EPA Region |
| 2002 Base |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
| 2005 Straw |
100% |
100% |
n/a |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
60% |
100% |
100% |
80% |
| Universe |
0 |
1 |
n/a |
1 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
17 |
18 |
5 |
50 |
Water Quality Stadards: Cumulative number of tribes that have water quality standards approved by EPA. (OST)
2002 Baseline: 23
2005 National Straw Target: 33
2008 National Target: 33
| EPA Region |
| 2002 Base |
0 |
0 |
n/a |
2 |
2 |
9 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
6 |
23 |
| 2005 Straw |
0 |
1 |
n/a |
2 |
3 |
11 |
0 |
2 |
5 |
9 |
33 |
| Universe* |
10 |
7 |
n/a |
6 |
35 |
66 |
9 |
27 |
140 |
265 |
565 |
*The universe is overstated because it should only include those tribes that have reservations and are eligible
for TAS status, since they are the only ones that are eligible to administer a WQS program. OST will determine what
the correct universe should be.
Monitoring: Of the total number of tribes that currently receive EPA funding, the number that have
developed comprehensive monitoring strategies that serve all water quality management needs for all tribal waters,
including all water body types, and provide their water quality data in a data suitable for storage in EPA’s
STORET database. (OWOW)
2002 Baseline: 0
2005 National Straw Target: 4*
2008 National Target: 90*
| EPA Region |
| 2002 Base |
0 |
0 |
n/a |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| 2005 Straw |
0 |
0 |
n/a |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
| Universe |
6 |
1 |
n/a |
5 |
29 |
35 |
4 |
23 |
90 |
36 |
229 |
*These target numbers are placeholders only. OWOW is presently working with EPA regions to develop straw
targets for 2005 and actual targets for 2008.
STORET Database: Of the total number of tribes that currently receive EPA funding, and that have developed
comprehensive monitoring strategies that serve all water quality management needs for all tribal waters, including all
water body types, the number that provide their water quality data in a format suitable for storage in EPA’s STORET database.
2002 Baseline: 0
2005 National Straw Target: 0
2008 National Target: 45*
| EPA Region |
| 2002 Base |
0 |
0 |
n/a |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| 2005 Straw |
0 |
0 |
n/a |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
| Universe |
6 |
1 |
n/a |
5 |
29 |
35 |
4 |
23 |
90 |
36 |
229 |
*None of the EPA regions have yet submitted 2005 straw targets for this measure, which makes reaching the
2008 target of 45 questionable. OWOW is working with the regions to develop straw targets for 2005 and a national
target for 2008./p>
Impaired Waters Measures: Number of tribes currently receiving EPA funding that have participated with
states and/or with EPA in the development of measures (e.g., TMDLs or watershed based plans) to restore and protect
watersheds with impaired waters. (OWOW)
2002 Baseline: TBD 2004
2005 National Straw Target: 24
2008 National Target: 420
| EPA Region |
| 2002 Base |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
| 2005 Straw |
3 |
0 |
n/a |
0 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
8 |
0 |
9 |
24 |
| Universe |
6 |
1 |
n/a |
5 |
29 |
35 |
4 |
23 |
90 |
36 |
229 |
All NPDES Permits in Indian country: Percentage of all NPDES permits that are considered current and, beginning in
2005, the percentage of high priority permits that are also current. (Permits for facilities in Indian country are to meet
the same standard/schedule as facilities in the rest of the country.) Targets will be reevaluated once the universe of
priority permits is defined cooperatively with states and tribes. (OWM)
2002 Baseline: 65%
2005 National Straw Target: 88%
2008 National Target: 90%
| EPA Region |
| 2002 Base |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
| 2005 Straw |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
100% |
80% (57) |
90% (12) |
85% (9) |
90% (140) |
90% (24) |
90% (53) |
88% |
| Universe |
0 |
1 |
n/a |
14 |
7,129 |
1,335 |
104 |
155 |
27 |
59 |
349 |
High-Priority Permits: Percentage of all NPDES permits that are considered current, and beginning in 2005,
the percentage of high-priority permits that are also current. Permits for facilities in Indian country are to meet the
same standard / schedule as permits elsewhere in the country. (These targets will be reevaluated once the universe of
priority permits is defined by EPA, in cooperation with tribes.) (OWM)
2002 Baseline: n/a
2005 National Straw Target: 95%
2008 National Target: 95%
| EPA Region |
| 2002 Base |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
| 2005 Straw |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
100% |
95% |
95% |
95% |
95% |
95% |
95% |
95% |
| Universe |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
The 95% target is annual, beginning in 2005. The total 2005 target is more than 95%, but, without a universe,
the calculation cannot be made. Regions are expected to define the universe of priority permits in Indian country
in early 2005.
Wataershed-Based Projects: Number of tribes that have participated in watershed-based wetlands and stream
corridor projects for which EPA has provided significant financial assistance. (Cumulative, including 104(b)(3) Wetland
Program and Five Star restoration program funding and/or technical assistance.) (OWOW)
2002 Baseline: 29
2005 National Straw Target: 34
2008 National Target: 170
| EPA Region |
| |
| 2002 Base |
2 |
0 |
n/a |
1 |
2 |
9 |
7 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
29 |
| 2005 Straw |
2 |
1 |
n/a |
1 |
4 |
2 |
8 |
12 |
2 |
2 |
34 |
| Universe |
10 |
7 |
n/a |
6 |
35 |
66 |
9 |
27 |
140 |
265 |
565 |
|