|
 |
 |
Connecticut
Responding to Urban Development -
Communities in the Mattabesset River Watershed
The Mattabesset River Watershed Pollution Management Project, initiated in
1992, targets nonpoint source pollution and the restoration of riparian areas
along the river and throughout the watershed. Sponsored jointly by the
Middlesex and Hartford county soil and water conservation districts, the
project is funded primarily by grants under sections 319 and 604(b) of the
Clean Water Act, with nonfederal matching contributions from the districts and
watershed communities.
The Mattabesset River is a major tributary of the Connecticut River in
central Connecticut, flowing 18 miles from its headwaters in New Britain to its
confluence with the Connecticut River in Middletown. The watershed's 44,000
acres are highly urbanized and include portions of seven towns. As a result of
intense development, water quality is impaired, and important habitats and
riparian areas have been lost. The major project objectives, related to these
conditions, are to
- develop a constituency for protection and improvement of the river;
- conduct chemical and biological water quality monitoring to establish
baseline conditions and measure progress;
- establish critical area treatment sites to demonstrate best management
practices;
- develop and implement water quality management programs for the
municipalities in the watershed; and
- reduce erosion and sedimentation from urban development sites.
To achieve these objectives, the conservation districts have conducted
stormwater management workshops for municipal officials and staff in the
watershed communities. The workshops served as a forum for ideas and provided
an opportunity for municipal staff from neighboring communities to build
working relationships. The districts also have provided "one-on-one" technical
training to help municipal staff conduct site plan reviews and field-based
problem solving. General workshops were conducted for municipal land use
commissioners as part of regular commission meetings.
The Connecticut River Watch Program (CRWP) helps the project identify
baseline conditions and water quality problems in the Mattabesset River. CRWP,
a volunteer water quality monitoring, protection, and improvement program
initiated in 1992, is an integral part of the watershed project. This ongoing
monitoring program has helped the watershed project focus its efforts to reduce
pollution, especially sediment, nutrients, and bacteria.
Project milestones
Project work in the Mattabesset watershed has focused on remediation and
restoration. BMPs for sediment control are incorporated in new developments,
municipal maintenance measures have been expanded to preserve riparian values
and reduce nonpoint source pollution, and people are becoming more involved
through education and outreach programs.
- At Progress Park, an industrial park adjacent to the Mattabesset in
Cromwell, a severely eroding site from which the topsoil had been stripped
prior to development was stabilized. In addition, a sediment delta that had
formed at the site's discharge point to the river was removed, helping to
restore the hydrological conditions in that stretch of the river.
- On West Swamp Brook in Middletown, an innovative bioengineering
method using coconut fiber rolls and live plants was used to stabilize and
restore a section of streambank where loss of riparian vegetation had resulted
in severe erosion. The newly stabilized banks protect property and water
quality.
- At a public school playing field adjacent to Belcher Brook in
Berlin, custodians roped off a 10-foot-wide strip along the water's edge to
form a natural vegetative buffer. Previously, the playing field was being mowed
right up to the streambank.
- In Cromwell Meadows, a significant tidal marsh in the mouth of the
Mattabesset River, junk cars and trash were removed, and cleanup activities
have continued on an annual basis.
- The town of Cromwell used bacteria data collected from Coles Brook
to help justify a sewer expansion project. A brochure about septic system
maintenance was also distributed to help residents deal with this problem.
Street sweeping and catch basin pumping also have decreased sediment and
nutrient pollution, and district staff are helping the towns' public works
departments develop pollution prevention plans for town garages and parking
lots.
The Mattabesset watershed project has improved the quality of the
Mattabesset River and its tributaries. It also has been successful at
encouraging behavior changes that may ultimately stem the tide of nonpoint
source pollution. Degraded areas have been restored and pollution controls
designed and implemented for the new development projects.
Town staff and land use commissioners, developers, and contractors are more
aware of best management practices to control nonpoint source pollution and are
beginning to adopt these best management practices as standard practices. Most
promising of all town staff, developers, and contractors have developed
stronger working relationships, spurred by a clearer understanding of the
necessity for nonpoint source pollution controls. In sum, the project has led
to increased communication and cooperation among the watershed towns.
Project managers view the new, grassroots Mattabesset River Watershed
Association as an important measure of their success. Citizens from the
watershed communities have formally established this organization as a
community-based group. The project believes that this new group will maintain
its vision of a restored watershed, advocate for its support, and provide
services to ensure the long-term protection of the river and its watershed.
CONTACT: Mel Cote
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 1
(617) 565-3537 |
Lake Whitney Artificial Marsh
Treats Urban Runoff
Lake Whitney, in Hamden, Connecticut (about three miles north of New Haven
Harbor and Long Island Sound) is a public water supply reservoir owned by the
South Central Connecticut Regional Water Authority. The lower portion of the
watershed is heavily developed; approximately 70 percent of land use is for
commercial, industrial, or high- density residential development. Because of
the large amount of impervious surface, the watershed used section 319 funding
to demonstrate how constructed, multicelled wetlands (or artificial marshes)
can reduce the impacts of urban runoff.
Describing the new system
The South Central Connecticut Regional Water Authority's design called for
redirecting a stormwater outfall draining about 20 acres of primarily small
residential lots (with 45 percent impervious cover) into a new multicell
treatment system. The new system consists of a sediment forebay, a sediment
basin, and an artificial marsh and wet pond. The cost was reasonable (less than
$50,000) and the system was compact, covering only about a half-acre or 2.6
percent of the contributing drainage area.
Multi-celled systems have many advantages. The sediment forebay effectively
traps coarse sediments and trash, is easy to clean, and preserves system
storage volumes. Subsequent treatment stages are easily accommodated in the
other cells, including further sediment removal in the sediment basin, and
biological treatment, filtration, and other pollutant removal mechanisms in the
marsh and wet pond cell. Long, narrow shapes were used in both the sediment
basin and wet pond to maximize detention time and pollutant removal. The system
is visually attractive, provides habitat for wildlife, and effectively removes
a variety of pollutants from urban runoff.
Monitoring of the system indicates that while the sediment basin has
variable removal rates, the combined sediment basin and wet pond removes
conventional pollutants and heavy metals in excess of 50 percent. Minimal
maintenance is needed, and with the exception of some nuisance wildlife
problems, no serious functional problems have arisen.
Although better water quality is the primary objective, multicell systems
with artificial marshes and wet ponds are also visually attractive and valuable
habitat for wildlife. Additional benefits include the simplicity of their
design and low maintenance requirements. Publicity generated by the Lake
Whitney project has increased awareness of urban runoff issues within local
government as attested by several recent land-use decisions within the
watershed. For example, a 30-acre shopping center has been approved, at least
in part because its developers included plans for a comprehensive stormwater
management system designed to minimize adverse impacts to water quality.
Planning a stormwater management system
This project identified a number of issues that should be considered during the
planning, design, construction, and operation of multicelled stormwater
management systems:
- Incorporate multicell concepts in the treatment design, with each
cell having its own primary function. Sediment forebays are effective, preserve
system storage volumes, and simplify maintenance. Subsequent stages can be
designed to serve many physical and biological treatment needs.
- Consider water quality goals, the quality of incoming runoff,
available land, and costs during the design phase. The detention volume should
be sufficient to treat at least one-half inch of runoff over the impervious
areas; however, additional volume and by-pass/overflow provisions may be
desirable for winter thaw and rain storms that can overwhelm a system of this
size.
- Increase the potential for pollutant removal by maximizing overland
flow and buffering vegetation. When using buffers to detain flow, flows should
be distributed across the buffers as evenly as possible.
- Enhance visual attractiveness by using curvilinear pond shapes,
peninsulas, and wetland and flowering plants; by substituting vegetation for
riprap; and by retaining existing trees where practicable.
- Consider in advance possible nuisance wildlife that could damage
vegetation and affect the appearance, structural integrity, and function of the
system. At Lake Whitney, for example, the project was plagued by muskrat
burrows and Canada geese droppings. Three-to-one side slopes, wire mesh
barriers, riprap in certain areas, winter drawdown, and trapping, grates, and
screens over outlet pipes are possible countermeasures. Selecting less
palatable plant species may also discourage nuisance wildlife.
- Design to facilitate maintenance. Ramps allow heavy equipment access
to sediment removal areas.
- Design inflow and outflow structures with adjustable water levels
and flows. Removable weir boards can be used to adjust water levels or
temporarily bypass flows. A high-flow bypass serves as an emergency spillway
and can be used to lower water levels for maintenance.
- Project managers should communicate with local officials early in
the planning process to facilitate local zoning approval. A stormwater
management project may be a new concept to local boards or may not fit existing
land-use regulations. In some cases, amending local regulations may be
necessary to expedite the process.
- Reuse stripped topsoil on basin side slopes and bottoms. In some
places, it may be necessary to place topsoil over excessively stony or gravel
bottoms to ensure successful wetland planting.
- Establish a permanent inspection and maintenance program to monitor
system performance and vegetative cover and plantings. Maintenance and
landscaping crews should be educated about how each component functions and how
to maintain it; for example, these personnel should be instructed on whether
vegetation should be mowed, removed, or left undisturbed. Crews should also
check system structures for erosion and subsidence, and look for wildlife
damage, sediment and debris accumulation, and vandalism. Sediment forebays
should be cleaned every two to three years, although local conditions, such as
excessive soil disturbance, may require more frequent cleaning.
CONTACT: Mel Cote
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 1
617 565-3537 |
|