MEMORANDUM U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Regional Offices
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Divisions and Districts
May 10, 1999
| TO: | U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Regional
Offices U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Divisions and Districts |
| FROM: | Robert H. Wayland III /Signed/ Director, Office of Wetlands, Oceans, and Watersheds Office of Water U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Eric V. Schaeffer /Signed/ Director, Office of Regulatory Enforcement Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Charles M. Hess /Signed/ Chief, Operations Division Directorate of Civil Works U.S. Army Corps of Engineers |
| SUBJECT: | Issuance of Final Rule Responding to National Mining Association Decision |
- On June 19, 1998, the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District
of Columbia Circuit affirmed the district court's decision regarding
the "Tulloch rule" (see, 58 Fed. Reg. 45008) (American
Mining Congress v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, 951
F.Supp. 267 (D.D.C. 1997), aff'd sub nom., National
Mining Association v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, 145
F. 3d 1399 (D.C. Cir., 1998).). In response, EPA and the Corps have
recently prepared and published a final rule in order to conform the
regulations to the decision and injunction. A copy of that rulemaking
is attached. EPA and the Corps will also expeditiously undertake additional
notice and comment rulemaking in order to enhance clarity, certainty,
and consistency in determining what activities are subject to section
404 in light of the National Mining Association decision.
- A copy of the guidance issued on April 11, 1997, in response to
the district court's decision in the subject case is also attached.
That guidance should continue to be followed, for an interim period,
until such time as the additional rulemaking identified above is completed,
with the exception that Corps Districts should no longer provide
potential applicants with the options identified in paragraph 5 of
that guidance. If a Corps District office receives or is already
processing an application for a permit covering activities involving
only "incidental fallback" (see the final rule's
preamble and the April 1997 guidance), then the Corps office should
inform the permit applicant that a section 404 permit is not required
for the activity.
- Determining whether a particular redeposit constitutes "incidental fallback" involves the exercise of case-by-case judgment. In the preamble to the attached final rule, EPA and the Corps have put the regulated community on notice that we intend to regulate discharges that we find, based on the particular circumstances, do in fact result in an addition of pollutants to waters of the U.S. When EPA or Corps field staff have questions about a particular activity or project that are unresolved after reviewing the attached final rule and the April 1997 guidance, they should contact their respective headquarters office to discuss the issue and reach an appropriate decision.
![[logo] US EPA](http://www.epa.gov/epafiles/images/logo_epaseal.gif)