Jump to main content.


First Annual Report on EPA Actions Implementing the Pesticide Registration Improvement Act - Fiscal Year 2004

Resources
PRIA Implementation Reports:

The Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2004, signed by President Bush on January 23, 2004, established a new section 33 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), which creates a registration service fee system for applications for specified pesticide registration, amended registration, and associated tolerance actions. Under this new system, fees are charged for covered applications received on or after March 23, 2004, and for certain pending applications received before that date. EPA is required to make a determination on the application within the decision times specified. The fee system is authorized until September 30, 2010, although the decision times under the system do not apply to applications received after September 30, 2008. This new system is known as the Pesticide Registration Improvement Act of 2003 (PRIA).

Under section 33(k) of PRIA, the Agency is required to publish an annual report describing actions taken under this section during the past fiscal year. Specifically, the Agency is directed to include several elements in the report, including a review of the progress made in carrying out its obligations under the Act, a description of the staffing and resources related to the costs associated with the review and decision-making pertaining to applications, and a review of its progress in meeting the reregistration and tolerance reassessment timeline requirements. This first annual report will cover the time period from January 23, 2004, through September 30, 2004.

On this page:

Early Implementation Efforts

The President’s approval of the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2004 triggered a 60-day implementation period for EPA prior to the effective date of PRIA (March 23, 2004). During this 60-day period, the Agency undertook a number of steps to implement PRIA. Those steps are described in this section of the annual report. The Agency’s first step was to create a number of intra-Agency workgroups to develop recommendations for certain aspects of the new registration systems. Committees established included: front-end processing and screening procedures; waivers and refunds; funds management; and communications.

Front-End Processing and Screening Procedures

To facilitate the implementation of PRIA, the Agency established new front-end screening procedures for new pesticide applications. Interpretations of the 90 PRIA registration categories were developed by an intra-agency workgroup composed of staff from the Office of Pesticide Programs and the Office of General Counsel. Preliminary interpretations were published on the Agency’s website on March 22, 2004. As the Agency gains experience with the application of these interpretations to incoming registration requests, the Agency intends to publish updates on its website (http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/fees/categories/index.htm). Expert teams from the three registering divisions (Antimicrobials Division, Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division, and Registration Division) have been established to screen all incoming applications, to determine if the request is subject to PRIA, and to assign the application to a PRIA category (if appropriate). Typically within 48-72 hours from receipt of the application, the registrant is sent an invoice requesting payment of the appropriate PRIA registration service fee. The Agency’s internal tracking system, known as the Office of Pesticide Programs Information Network (OPPIN), was re-tooled to track all PRIA applications to ensure compliance with the PRIA decision time review periods. The Agency also enhanced OPPIN to mail invoices electronically to applicants.

In addition, the Agency revised its procedures for the initial screening of all data submitted to the Agency by registrants. With the new PRIA resources, the Agency enhanced its existing data management contract to reduce the study processing time to 10 days. This step now ensures that complete data packages are ready to enter the review process at the beginning of the specified decision time review period if the applicant has correctly formatted the data submission.

Funds Management/Funds Utilization

Section 33(c) of PRIA established the Pesticide Registration Fund. Congress established this fund in the Treasury of the United States to carry out the provisions of PRIA. All registration service fees received by the Agency are deposited in this fund. Expenditures from the fund can be made to cover the costs associated with the review and decision-making pertaining to all applications for which registration service fees have been paid. To facilitate the creation of this Fund, the Agency worked with the Mellon Bank to establish the fund, create billing procedures, and coordinate communications on fee receipts between the Bank and the Agency. This latter piece was particularly critical as the fee payment receipt triggers the start of decision time review period.

Waivers and Fee Reductions

Section 33(b)(7) of PRIA authorizes the Agency to reduce or waive the applicable registration service fee under certain specified situations. The Agency developed guidance on how to apply for waivers of the registration service fee and posted them on its website (http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/fees/questions/waivers.htm) prior to the PRIA effective date. In addition, working with the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), the Agency was granted an emergency clearance under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) to collect the necessary information from pesticide applicants to support the fee waiver program. The Agency established a cross-Agency team, composed of members from the Office of Pesticide Programs, the Office of General Counsel, and the Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization, to review all incoming fee waiver requests.

In addition, working with the Inter-regional Project Number 4 (IR-4 Program), the Agency established procedures for reviewing IR-4 waiver requests. The IR-4 Program agreed to take on an enhanced coordination function, streamlining the submission of tolerance petitions and registration applications for IR-4-supported applications. This new process has facilitated swifter reviews of fee waiver requests under the IR-4 waiver provisions.

The Agency also established formulae for reducing certain registration service fees based upon work completed by the Agency prior to the PRIA effective date. Section 33(b)(8)(C) authorizes the Agency to issue discretionary refunds, including in instances where the Agency had completed portions of the review of an application before the PRIA effective date. For fees required of pending new active ingredients and for applications for which the registrant identified a willingness to voluntarily pay the registration service fee, the Agency applied this refund provision as a credit towards the application registration service fee. The fee reduction formulae can be found at: in the (PRIA 3): Overview of Fee Reduction and Refund Formula (PDF) (7 p 369.16). During Fiscal Year 2004, the Agency reduced $3.7 million in registration service fees based upon work completed by the Agency on pending applications prior to the PRIA effective date.

Communications and Outreach

On March 11, 2004, the Agency held a workshop to educate affected stakeholders and the public on PRIA implementation and impacts. This workshop was attended by nearly 500 people. Topics ranged from an overview of the new statute, revised application submission procedures, guidance on the review of waivers, and the Agency’s initial considerations for how to allocate resources from the Pesticide Registration Fund to the worker protection program and the inert ingredients review program. The Agency’s presentations can be found on the EPA website at: http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/fees/index.htm.

As required by the statute, on March 17, 2004, the Agency published the schedule of covered applications and registration service fees. In addition, since the statute suspended the Agency’s authority to collect tolerance petition fees, the Agency issued a final rule on March 17, 2004, suspending the tolerance petition fee collection regulations.

The Agency also established a website dedicated solely to PRIA implementation. The site is http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/fees. Through this website, the public can submit questions regarding PRIA implementation. Questions are typically answered within 24 hours.

Top of page

Financial Overview

During fiscal year 2004, the Agency received $14.7 million in new registration service fees. From these new fees, the Agency spent approximately $5 million, carrying the remaining balance of $9.7 million forward to fiscal year 2005. The chart below summarizes the Agency’s FY2004 expenditures from the Pesticide Registration Fund (figures presented are in thousands):


graphic pie chart FY2004 pria expenditures



The majority of the expenditures from the Pesticide Registration Fund were spent on payroll costs and to expand data review output through contracts. The Agency also invested heavily in upgrading its information management system (the Office of Pesticide Programs Information Network) to be able to track compliance with the PRIA decision time review periods.

Waivers of Registration Service Fees

In response to requests for fee waivers and fee reductions, as authorized by PRIA, the Agency waived $1.5 million in registration service fees. The Agency reviewed over 200 waiver requests, granting over 85 percent of the waivers requested. Agency decisions to grant waivers were reviewed, on average, in 52 days. Agency decisions to deny waiver requests were reviewed, on average, in 67 days, slightly above the PRIA standard of 60 days. Since the end of fiscal year 2004, the Agency has revised its internal procedures to ensure that waiver decisions are always made within the 60-day statutory review period.

Top of page

Progress in Meeting Decision Times

Number of PRIA Actions Completed in FY2004
The Agency completed 208 decisions subject to PRIA during the fiscal year. All decisions were made within the statutorily-mandated decision review times. The chart below summarizes the number of decisions completed by PRIA category.


Progress in Meeting Decision Times area

  PRIA Category
Number of PRIA Applications Completed in FY2004
R1
2
R2
4
R7
1
R17
1
R18
1
R20
1
R24
2
R26
1
R30
72
R31
62
R32
1
R33
3
R34
29
R35
4
A53
7
A54
2
A57
5
B59
3
B60
1
B66
3
B67
1
B68
1
B69
1
TOTAL
208
 
Appendix A contains a list of all applications subject to PRIA reviewed during FY2004 and includes the decision times for each application. Number of PRIA Applications Pending at the End of FY2004.

The following table summarizes the number of pending registration applications in each of the PRIA categories. As of September 30, 2004, 1,081 applications subject to PRIA were pending in the Agency’s registration queue.

  PRIA Category
Number of PRIA Applications Pending at the End of FY2004
R1
31
R2
13
R5
1
R6
7
R9
1
R11
2
R14
3
R15
2
R17
81
R18
51
R19
18
R20
17
R23
30
R24
2
R26
9
R28
9
R29
6
R30
81
R31
243
R32
13
R33
32
R34
110
R35
49
R36
2
R37
4
A38
1
A41
12
A42
15
A48
2
A49
5
A50
3
A51
1
A52
1
A53
23
A54
32
A55
5
A56
4
A57
36
B59
15
B60
20
B63
5
B65
1
B66
1
B67
48
B68
8
B69
1
B70
1
B71
4
B72
3
B73
1
B75
2
B80
2
B81
4
B84
1
B86
2
B88
5

Pending Inert Ingredients at the End of FY2004

PRIA section 33(k)(2)(A)(ii) also requires the Agency to provide the number of inert ingredients pending review by the Agency. As of September 30, 2004, the Agency had 44 petitions for new inert ingredients (37 received prior to the PRIA effective date and 7 received subsequently)

Top of page

Process Improvements in the Registration Program

Section 33(e) of PRIA directs the Agency to identify and evaluate reforms to the pesticide registration process, with the goal of reducing decision reviews times for pesticide registration applications. The Agency has made considerable progress during the fiscal year in improving its operations. It has undertaken a number of steps, both internal and external, to explore, develop, and implement improvements in the registration process.

In identifying process improvements, the Agency will not compromise the scientific quality of its assessments as a means towards reducing decision time review periods. The Agency believes that, in terms of receiving recommendations for process improvements, the best means of gathering together suggested improvement areas was through the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) process.

Formation of a Process Improvement Workgroup

A major effort during FY2004 was the creation of a new workgroup under the auspices of the Pesticide Program Dialogue Committee to evaluate process improvements in the registration program. This Process Improvement Workgroup is composed of members of individual registrant companies, pesticide trade associations, public interest groups, and Agency staff. Meetings are open to the public and are held approximately every 3-4 months. The first meeting of the Process Improvement Workgroup was held in August 2004. Reports from these meetings can be found on the Agency’s website at: http://www.epa.gov/oppfead1/cb/ppdc/pria/index.html.

Industry stakeholders identified many areas for improvement in the registration process, ranging from in-processing of applications, how applications should be reviewed, and the involvement of the registrants in the decision-making process. Many of the process improvements proposed by the Agency complemented these issues. The Agency continues to work with all stakeholders to evaluate these and other potential improvements to the registration process.

Process Improvements Implemented within the Registration Program

A key process improvement has been improved coordination between EPA and the IR-4 Program. Historically, the registration application to add a new IR-4 supported use to a label has not been submitted simultaneously with the IR-4 tolerance petition. Often times, the label request has arrived several months to years after the IR-4 tolerance petition has been submitted to the Agency. This delay in the label submission ultimately affects the Agency’s ability to act on the tolerance petition submitted by IR-4 in a timely manner. The IR-4 program volunteered to perform a new coordination function in which they will submit the registration request on behalf of the registrant simultaneously with the IR-4 tolerance petition. This coordinated submission will ensure the timely start of the decision time review period under PRIA and will give minor use growers greater predictability of when to anticipate a registration decision.

Scoping Meetings

Scoping is the process of examining and often re-examining the specific action to determine what specific work is required to complete the action. Another aspect of scoping is determining how this work can be completed in the most efficient manner possible and defining a schedule for the action based on this determination. The Agency has begun to use existing alternative processes – the low toxicity screening group and the Alternative Risk Integration and Assessment (ARIA) Team –to think of new and innovative ways to review registration requests more efficiently. The Agency’s scientific organizations have also begun scoping exercises, such as problem formulation and risk tiering, to evaluate new registration submissions.

bppdconsistency@epa.gov

The Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division (BPPD) created a service, known as bppdconsistency@epa.gov, to respond to issues concerning Biopesticide registration inconsistency that affect processing of submissions. The Division’s biopesticide Regulatory Action Leaders (RALs) meet on a regular basis to discuss issues raised through this service and provide an answer usually within two to three weeks. BPPD posts the resolution of issues at: http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/biopesticides/.

Top of page


Progress in Meeting Tolerance Reassessment and Food Use Reregistration Timelines

FY2004 Accomplishments

During Fiscal Year 2004, the Agency made significant progress in completing risk assessments and risk management decisions for pesticide reregistration. The Agency completed 17 Reregistration Eligibility Decisions (REDs). During Fiscal Year 2004, the Agency issued tolerance reassessment eligibility decisions (TREDs) for 18 active ingredients and 8 pesticide inert ingredients. These decisions resulted in the completion of 467 tolerance reassessments

Status of Reregistration

Through the end of FY2004, the Agency has completed 244 REDs and must issue 137 more REDs to complete reregistration by the end of FY2008. EPA’s goal is to complete 30-40 reregistration eligibility decisions each year during fiscal years 2005 and 2006 for pesticides with associated tolerances, and to complete a total of 40 REDs in FY2007 and FY2008 for pesticides with no food uses or tolerances. This will satisfy PRIA requirements and support the Agency’s tolerance reassessment and reregistration goals. EPA’s schedule for completing these decisions can be found on the Agency’s website at: http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/reregistration/product-rereg-schedule.htm.

Status of Tolerance Reassessment

Through the end of FY2004, the Agency has completed a total of 7,092 tolerance reassessment decisions to date, addressing 73% of the 9,721 tolerances that require reassessment. EPA is accomplishing tolerance reassessment through both the registration and reregistration programs; by revoking tolerances for pesticides that have been canceled, by reevaluating pesticides with pre-FQPA REDs, and through other decisions not directly related to reregistration or registration.

More specifics on the Agency’s progress in meeting its performance measures and goals for pesticide reregistration will be published in the Federal Register, as required by section 4(l) of FIFRA.

Top of page

Other Considerations

Use of Outside Reviewers

During the course of FY2004, the Agency explored mechanisms for enhancing its work share efforts with Canada’s Pest Management Regulatory Agency (PMRA) and the California Department of Pesticide Regulation (CDPR). Currently, there are 6 active ingredients being jointly evaluated by the EPA and PMRA as part of the Joint Review Program under the North American Free Trade Agreement. Through this process, EPA makes its own registration decision.

In further exploration of the use of outside reviewers, during fiscal year 2004, EPA worked with CDPR to expand their capacity to review residue chemistry studies and conduct dietary risk assessments in support of registration decisions. During FY2004, 11 crop combinations were reviewed through this joint effort. In addition, the two agencies collaboratively reviewed two new biopesticide active ingredients during FY2004.

In addition, during FY2004, the Agency detailed a senior manager to the Pesticides Section, Health and Consumer Protection Directorate, European Commission (EC) to build on the existing work sharing activities and lines of communication between EPA and the EC. Areas of focus included facilitating the exchange of risk assessments and advancing the sharing of workload between EPA and the EC to achieve more consistency in pesticide regulatory decisions for the registration and reregistration of pesticides, evaluation and registration of new active ingredients, guidelines on methodologies used in evaluations, and activities involving inert ingredients.

Performance-Based Contracts

In March 2004, the Office of Pesticide Programs solicited proposals from other program offices within the Agency that might want enhanced funding to support the Agency’s PRIA implementation efforts. The Office requested that other programs submit proposals describing the additional services that could be provided to assist in providing enhanced registration services, the resources necessary to provide these additional services, and a description of the performance measures that could be implemented to monitor the provision of these services.

In response, the Office of Pesticide Programs entered into a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with the Agency’s Office of Acquisition Management (OAM) to award, modify, and initiate contract actions in support of PRIA. OAM agreed to negotiate accelerated performance agreements with contractors within 30 days; exercise additional quantities options with 48 hours of request, among other considerations, while maintaining the existing contract performance standards in place before PRIA passed. OAM agreed to submit bi-weekly monitoring reports to OPP. For provision of these enhanced services, the Agency allocated OAM one full-time equivalent (FTE) from resources supporting PRIA.

A second area under PRIA where the Agency has employed the use of performance-based contracts is in the area of processing and indexing support for studies and other technical documents submitted in support of registration decisions. Utilizing resources from the Pesticide Registration Fund, the Agency increased contract funding to lower the average study processing time from 20 days to 10 days. Through a combination of hiring new staff and the learning curve for the new hires, it took a few months to meet the new turnaround time for all data. Since August 1, 2004, the contractor has consistently met the accelerated processing schedule for all new incoming data. From August 1, 2004 to January 28, 2005 the Agency received 2,110 studies subject to PRIA. The contractor was able to process these studies, on average, within 1.84 days. Through this effort, technical evaluators have more time to review the scientific information submitted in support of registration applications, ensuring a higher quality technical assessment.

Top of page


Appendix A: Decision Review Types for Actions Completed During FY2004

As required by Section 33(k) of PRIA, the following table provides the decision times for each application reviewed during Fiscal Year 2004. Note that negative decision times indicate that the Agency completed the action before it received payment or a waiver was granted. Completion of a registration action before payment is received typically occurs in situations where a voluntary fee payment has been offered for an application that was pending with the Agency prior to March 23, 2004 (the PRIA effective date). As EPA improves its reporting capabilities, the Agency reserves the right to update this completions table, as necessary.


Key to the Table
M = New Active Ingredient application subject to the mandatory fee provisions
N = Application received on or after March 23, 2004
V = Voluntary payment request

PRIA Code Type Decision Number Registration Number PRIA Start Date PRIA Due Date Agency Completion Date Decision Time (in days)
A53 N 341185 57787-30 5/3/2004 8/1/2004 7/7/2004 65
A53 N 341214 3008-88 4/16/2004 7/15/2004 6/30/2004 75
A53 N 342524 70404-8 5/13/2004 8/11/2004 7/7/2004 55
A53 N 343307 81343-1 8/2/2004 10/31/2004 9/29/2004 58
A53 N 343695 67420-2 8/23/2004 11/21/2004 8/31/2004 8
A53 N 344559 75340-4 6/24/2004 9/22/2004 8/10/2004 47
A53 N 346240 6836-322 8/24/2004 11/22/2004 9/1/2004 8
A54 N 341359 5383-118 4/20/2004 10/17/2004 6/30/2004 71
A54 N 343308 67619-11 6/2/2004 11/29/2004 9/3/2004 93
A57 N 341429 10324-25 4/21/2004 10/18/2004 9/9/2004 141
A57 N 342806 5813-54 5/25/2004 11/21/2004 8/26/2004 94
A57 N 342971 71654-7 5/26/2004 11/22/2004 8/10/2004 76
A57 N 343962 1258-841 6/11/2004 12/8/2004 9/9/2004 90
A57 N 344452 1258-1224 6/11/2004 12/8/2004 9/9/2004 90
B59 M 215459 73314-1 7/21/2004 11/13/2005 5/24/2004 -58
B59 V 340102 75624-1 6/1/2004 9/24/2005 5/28/2004 -4
B59 V 340103 75624-2 6/20/2004 10/13/2005 9/17/2004 90
B60 M 218667 74200-1 8/2/2004 7/28/2005 9/20/2004 49
B66 V 333929 69579-2 5/19/2004 8/17/2004 7/28/2004 70
B66 N 341434 75499-14 5/26/2004 8/24/2004 8/17/2004 84
B66 N 341710 69592-19 4/27/2004 7/26/2004 6/25/2004 59
B67 V 214368 2217-857 9/1/2004 2/28/2005 9/24/2004 23
B68 N 346377 2724-448 8/2/2004 1/29/2005 8/30/2004 28
B69 M 331295 75108-1 6/2/2004 11/29/2004 9/15/2004 105
R01 M 214531 264-808 7/8/2004 8/22/2007 6/30/2004 -8
R01 M 218937 400-512 9/2/2004 10/17/2007 9/10/2004 8
R02 M 211688 62719-499 6/17/2004 2/2/2007 9/27/2004 102
R02 M 219301 33657-10 8/16/2004 4/3/2007 9/17/2004 32
R02 V 220039 33657-17 8/16/2004 4/3/2007 9/17/2004 32
R02 V 340127 33657-16 8/16/2004 4/3/2007 9/23/2004 38
R07 M 211862 100-1175 6/15/2004 8/4/2006 8/5/2004 51
R17 V 329609 279-3279 6/3/2004 7/18/2007 9/30/2004 119
R18 N 341117 7501-173 4/13/2004 3/29/2007 8/18/2004 127
R20 V 328694 264-678 8/2/2004 7/18/2007 7/30/2004 -3
R24 V 211995 352-627 7/20/2004 9/8/2006 8/18/2004 30
R24 V 212007 59639-130 8/2/2004 9/21/2006 9/30/2004 58
R26 N 342803 6218-36 7/28/2004 7/18/2006 9/7/2004 42
R30 V 211791 66222-95 5/7/2004 8/5/2004 5/17/2004 10
R30 V 211971 66222-97 5/17/2004 8/15/2004 5/28/2004 12
R30 V 219059 66222-89 5/17/2004 8/15/2004 5/11/2004 -6
R30 V 330302 2749-521 7/27/2004 10/25/2004 8/23/2004 27
R30 N 340982 79676-1 4/13/2004 7/12/2004 7/9/2004 87
R30 N 340991 79676-2 4/13/2004 7/12/2004 7/9/2004 87
R30 N 341284 66222-103 4/19/2004 7/18/2004 7/15/2004 87
R30 N 341287 34704-854 4/19/2004 7/18/2004 5/4/2004 15
R30 N 341293 51036-429 4/19/2004 7/18/2004 5/21/2004 33
R30 N 341294 72155-64 6/2/2004 8/31/2004 8/18/2004 77
R30 N 341361 51036-430 4/20/2004 7/19/2004 5/21/2004 32
R30 N 341362 79676-3 4/20/2004 7/19/2004 7/16/2004 87
R30 N 341500 46075-5 4/20/2004 7/19/2004 7/6/2004 77
R30 V 341583 524-554 5/27/2004 8/25/2004 7/15/2004 48
R30 N 341706 1021-1813 6/15/2004 9/13/2004 7/12/2004 28
R30 N 341760 9688-218 5/17/2004 8/15/2004 5/19/2004 3
R30 V 341851 66330-54 6/9/2004 9/7/2004 8/10/2004 61
R30 N 341926 73049-414 5/3/2004 8/1/2004 6/3/2004 31
R30 N 342100 79676-4 5/6/2004 8/4/2004 6/30/2004 56
R30 N 342101 52287-17 5/6/2004 8/4/2004 6/21/2004 46
R30 N 342111 52287-18 5/3/2004 8/1/2004 6/21/2004 49
R30 N 342433 9198-222 5/17/2004 8/15/2004 8/9/2004 84
R30 N 342460 59913-12 5/13/2004 8/11/2004 8/5/2004 84
R30 N 342461 34704-857 5/10/2004 8/8/2004 5/18/2004 9
R30 N 342464 34704-858 5/10/2004 8/8/2004 6/28/2004 49
R30 N 342465 264-828 5/13/2004 8/11/2004 6/8/2004 26
R30 N 342466 264-827 5/13/2004 8/11/2004 7/7/2004 56
R30 N 342575 66222-105 5/17/2004 8/15/2004 6/30/2004 45
R30 N 342608 34704-856 5/12/2004 8/10/2004 8/6/2004 87
R30 N 342609 239-2690 5/14/2004 8/12/2004 8/5/2004 84
R30 N 342610 149-15 5/17/2004 8/15/2004 8/4/2004 80
R30 N 342611 34704-855 5/12/2004 8/10/2004 8/6/2004 87
R30 N 342612 239-2691 5/14/2004 8/12/2004 8/5/2004 84
R30 N 342701 46059-1 5/19/2004 8/17/2004 8/10/2004 84
R30 N 342858 34704-860 5/25/2004 8/23/2004 5/26/2004 2
R30 N 342860 34704-861 5/25/2004 8/23/2004 8/17/2004 85
R30 N 342861 34704-859 5/25/2004 8/23/2004 8/18/2004 86
R30 N 342862 42750-77 5/25/2004 8/23/2004 7/12/2004 48
R30 N 342964 9688-220 6/14/2004 9/12/2004 8/16/2004 63
R30 N 342965 9688-219 6/14/2004 9/12/2004 8/16/2004 63
R30 N 343094 34704-862 5/28/2004 8/26/2004 8/26/2004 91
R30 N 343095 34704-863 5/28/2004 8/26/2004 8/26/2004 91
R30 N 343125 71085-24 5/20/2004 8/18/2004 6/8/2004 19
R30 N 343129 71376-1 5/28/2004 8/26/2004 8/9/2004 73
R30 V 343259 52287-16 8/23/2004 11/21/2004 9/28/2004 35
R30 N 343262 51036-432 6/7/2004 9/5/2004 8/11/2004 65
R30 N 343263 33657-35 8/16/2004 11/14/2004 9/9/2004 25
R30 N 343264 33657-36 8/16/2004 11/14/2004 9/9/2004 25
R30 N 343371 33657-37 8/16/2004 11/14/2004 9/7/2004 23
R30 N 343372 33657-34 8/16/2004 11/14/2004 9/7/2004 23
R30 N 343462 74843-3 6/3/2004 9/1/2004 8/16/2004 74
R30 N 343536 869-245 6/8/2004 9/6/2004 7/27/2004 50
R30 N 343765 79676-7 6/10/2004 9/8/2004 7/23/2004 43
R30 N 343767 79676-6 6/10/2004 9/8/2004 7/21/2004 42
R30 N 343768 79676-5 6/10/2004 9/8/2004 7/20/2004 40
R30 N 343906 79676-9 6/15/2004 9/13/2004 7/26/2004 41
R30 N 343907 79676-10 6/15/2004 9/13/2004 7/26/2004 42
R30 N 343908 79676-8 6/15/2004 9/13/2004 8/10/2004 56
R30 N 343909 67572-82 9/7/2004 12/6/2004 9/30/2004 23
R30 N 343997 81198-1 6/17/2004 9/15/2004 8/6/2004 50
R30 N 343998 81198-2 6/17/2004 9/15/2004 8/6/2004 50
R30 N 344538 239-2692 6/30/2004 9/28/2004 9/21/2004 83
R30 N 344539 1381-189 6/23/2004 9/21/2004 8/6/2004 45
R30 N 344856 79676-11 6/28/2004 9/26/2004 7/6/2004 8
R30 N 344857 79676-12 6/28/2004 9/26/2004 9/10/2004 74
R30 N 344885 34704-864 6/30/2004 9/28/2004 9/17/2004 80
R30 N 345016 9688-221 7/5/2004 10/3/2004 7/29/2004 24
R30 N 345044 40849-77 7/21/2004 10/19/2004 9/14/2004 56
R30 N 345285 34704-865 7/9/2004 10/7/2004 8/25/2004 47
R30 N 345652 52287-19 7/20/2004 10/18/2004 8/17/2004 29
R30 N 345679 79676-13 7/15/2004 10/13/2004 8/25/2004 41
R30 N 346792 3862-175 9/13/2004 12/12/2004 9/21/2004 8
R31 V 211674 75395-1 6/7/2004 4/3/2005 6/23/2004 16
R31 V 211723 228-404 7/6/2004 5/2/2005 9/3/2004 59
R31 V 211781 44616-22 8/16/2004 6/12/2005 7/12/2004 -35
R31 V 211785 75395-2 6/7/2004 4/3/2005 6/23/2004 16
R31 V 211934 51036-427 7/12/2004 5/8/2005 8/3/2004 22
R31 V 212019 100-1177 6/8/2004 4/4/2005 8/13/2004 66
R31 V 214068 75240-1 5/13/2004 3/9/2005 6/2/2004 20
R31 V 214081 75240-6 5/13/2004 3/9/2005 6/15/2004 33
R31 V 214087 75240-4 5/12/2004 3/8/2005 6/15/2004 33
R31 V 214088 75240-5 5/13/2004 3/9/2005 6/15/2004 33
R31 V 214134 270-371 6/7/2004 4/3/2005 8/23/2004 77
R31 V 214401 270-373 6/7/2004 4/3/2005 8/23/2004 77
R31 V 215192 100-1170 5/4/2004 2/28/2005 9/29/2004 147
R31 V 218168 6297-7 6/4/2004 3/31/2005 6/25/2004 21
R31 V 218626 51036-387 7/6/2004 5/2/2005 6/30/2004 -6
R31 V 220210 62719-480 5/5/2004 3/1/2005 6/9/2004 35
R31 V 220229 62719-482 6/1/2004 3/28/2005 7/29/2004 59
R31 V 328887 33658-21 7/6/2004 5/2/2005 9/21/2004 77
R31 V 329754 40849-75 7/21/2004 5/17/2005 9/14/2004 55
R31 V 329761 40849-76 7/21/2004 5/17/2005 9/14/2004 55
R31 V 330143 121-87 5/27/2004 3/23/2005 6/16/2004 20
R31 V 330403 9688-211 5/27/2004 3/23/2005 6/18/2004 22
R31 V 331642 228-414 6/14/2004 4/10/2005 6/10/2004 -4
R31 V 332357 58190-3 6/14/2004 4/10/2005 9/2/2004 80
R31 V 332765 228-411 6/14/2004 4/10/2005 9/27/2004 105
R31 V 332795 72167-31 8/27/2004 6/23/2005 9/8/2004 12
R31 V 332821 9688-213 5/25/2004 3/21/2005 6/18/2004 24
R31 V 333337 100-1187 6/3/2004 3/30/2005 8/13/2004 70
R31 V 333513 100-1190 6/4/2004 3/31/2005 8/13/2004 69
R31 V 333552 228-416 6/14/2004 4/10/2005 9/8/2004 87
R31 V 333719 228-417 7/1/2004 4/27/2005 9/8/2004 69
R31 V 333924 79604-1 5/13/2004 3/9/2005 5/7/2004 -6
R31 V 334416 79604-2 5/13/2004 3/9/2005 5/19/2004 6
R31 V 334428 100-1191 6/3/2004 3/30/2005 6/24/2004 21
R31 V 334746 228-418 6/14/2004 4/10/2005 9/8/2004 87
R31 V 334847 100-1194 6/7/2004 4/3/2005 6/30/2004 22
R31 V 335761 100-1195 6/4/2004 3/31/2005 7/29/2004 54
R31 V 336254 59639-133 5/25/2004 3/21/2005 7/13/2004 49
R31 V 336363 432-1391 5/27/2004 3/23/2005 5/13/2004 -15
R31 V 336557 51036-428 7/12/2004 5/8/2005 8/5/2004 24
R31 V 338193 228-424 6/14/2004 4/10/2005 8/2/2004 50
R31 V 338227 79604-3 5/13/2004 3/9/2005 6/15/2004 33
R31 V 339559 62719-516 2/4/2005 12/1/2005 7/7/2004 -212
R31 V 340113 239-2689 6/4/2004 3/31/2005 9/3/2004 90
R31 V 340857 100-1201 5/4/2004 2/28/2005 7/1/2004 57
R31 N 340980 7501-209 4/13/2004 2/7/2005 4/22/2004 9
R31 N 340999 54287-RA 6/20/2004 4/16/2005 9/7/2004 79
R31 N 341211 71368-50 4/27/2004 2/21/2005 6/30/2004 65
R31 N 341212 264-823 4/16/2004 2/10/2005 6/29/2004 74
R31 N 341458 352-636 4/21/2004 2/15/2005 8/3/2004 105
R31 N 341711 432-1407 4/27/2004 2/21/2005 9/22/2004 148
R31 N 341924 2935-535 5/3/2004 2/27/2005 7/30/2004 88
R31 V 342343 228-428 7/8/2004 5/4/2005 8/25/2004 48
R31 N 342432 7969-225 5/17/2004 3/13/2005 9/17/2004 124
R31 N 344243 69526-9 6/25/2004 4/21/2005 8/10/2004 46
R31 N 347427 432-1416 9/1/2004 6/28/2005 9/22/2004 21
R31 V 211780 228-406 7/8/2004 5/4/2005 8/31/2004 54
R31 V 335172 228-419 7/8/2004 5/4/2005 9/8/2004 62
R31 V 343254 228-429 7/8/2004 5/4/2005 9/9/2004 63
R31 V 343255 228-430 7/8/2004 5/4/2005 8/13/2004 36
R31 V 343494 228-432 7/8/2004 5/4/2005 9/9/2004 63
R31 V 343517 228-431 7/8/2004 5/4/2005 9/9/2004 63
R32 V 218772 4691-167 9/1/2004 12/25/2005 9/10/2004 9
R33 V 211939 2217-863 8/4/2004 7/25/2006 8/13/2004 9
R33 V 214369 270-374 6/7/2004 5/28/2006 8/23/2004 77
R33 V 333751 2217-870 8/4/2004 7/25/2006 9/9/2004 36
R34 V 195962 100-895 5/5/2004 9/2/2004 8/19/2004 106
R34 V 335270 9688-193 5/25/2004 11/21/2004 4/9/2004 -46
R34 V 335478 66222-36 5/7/2004 11/3/2004 6/1/2004 25
R34 V 335830 432-1409 5/27/2004 11/23/2004 9/8/2004 104
R34 V 336272 264-777 5/12/2004 11/8/2004 5/7/2004 -6
R34 V 336963 55541-2 6/2/2004 11/29/2004 7/8/2004 36
R34 V 338391 66222-54 5/7/2004 11/3/2004 5/20/2004 14
R34 V 338625 100-999 5/12/2004 11/8/2004 9/10/2004 120
R34 V 339531 100-902 5/5/2004 11/1/2004 4/29/2004 -6
R34 N 341740 75066-2 5/25/2004 11/21/2004 9/21/2004 119
R34 V 341775 400-480 6/7/2004 12/4/2004 6/28/2004 21
R34 N 342054 432-1318 5/5/2004 11/1/2004 5/13/2004 9
R34 N 342059 432-1312 5/5/2004 11/1/2004 5/13/2004 9
R34 N 342399 1021-891 5/12/2004 11/8/2004 9/17/2004 128
R34 N 342618 70829-5 5/25/2004 11/21/2004 7/7/2004 44
R34 V 342762 400-175 6/7/2004 12/4/2004 7/8/2004 31
R34 N 343302 11678-18 6/9/2004 12/6/2004 8/2/2004 54
R34 N 343679 73342-1 6/10/2004 12/7/2004 7/21/2004 41
R34 N 343960 59639-41 6/16/2004 12/13/2004 9/3/2004 80
R34 N 344064 71995-33 6/18/2004 12/15/2004 9/16/2004 90
R34 N 344946 66222-85 6/29/2004 12/26/2004 7/13/2004 14
R34 N 345480 1021-1758 7/20/2004 1/16/2005 6/21/2004 -29
R34 N 345506 19713-329 11/22/2004 5/21/2005 9/27/2004 -57
R34 N 345602 100-1017 7/19/2004 1/15/2005 8/25/2004 37
R34 N 345943 59639-107 7/22/2004 1/18/2005 9/22/2004 63
R34 N 347424 73049-295 9/1/2004 2/28/2005 9/23/2004 22
R34 N 345944 59639-123 7/22/2004 1/18/2005 9/22/2004 63
R34 N 345945 59639-108 7/22/2004 1/18/2005 9/23/2004 64
R34 N 347160 72500-9 9/1/2004 2/28/2005 9/1/2004 0
R35 V 208310 352-597 5/13/2004 1/3/2006 6/1/2004 19
R35 V 336276 264-765 5/4/2004 12/25/2005 4/26/2004 -9
R35 V 340164 264-819 5/4/2004 12/25/2005 4/26/2004 -9
R35 V 342887 241-346 4/19/2004 12/10/2005 9/10/2004 145

Top of page

 

 

Publications | Glossary | A-Z Index | Jobs


Local Navigation


Jump to main content.