Skip common site navigation and headers
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Puget Sound Georgia Basin Ecosystem
Begin Hierarchical Links EPA Home > Region 10 > Puget Sound Georgia Basin Ecosystem > Indicators > Species at Risk > Why is it happening? End Hierarchical Links

 

Why is it happening?

There are three major factors that influence species decline:

  1. Habitat loss, degradation and fragmentation
  2. Over-harvesting
  3. Pollution and chemical contaminants

Habitat Loss

Nothing more profoundly affects the ability of species to live than habitat loss. Imagine three-quarters of your home being swept away by a bulldozer with only one remaining wall to provide privacy for you and your partner, and the most direct and safe route to the food market blocked. This is the scenario that our wildlife faces when wetlands, forestlands, prairies and beach areas are paved over, our shorelines bulkheaded, intertidal areas dredged, large overwater structures are placed on pilings, and pipes and cables are laid on the ocean floor.

Habitat loss occurs due to:

  • Conversion to other uses such as agriculture, development or bare land
  • Fragmentation
  • Degradation

Once native habitat is converted to other uses, the remaining habitat often becomes isolated in a fragmented (cut up) landscape of multiple land uses. Wildlife populations associated with these fragmented habitats are often subjected to isolation from other breeding populations, competition and predation from other species and increased conflicts with other land uses.13

For example, the Sockeye Salmon in Sakinaw Lake in BC illustrates how even partial modification in habitat can have a dramatic effect. The number of adults returning to Sakinaw Lake to spawn has dropped from an average of 1,000 adults annually in 1987 to less than 80 in 2002. The lake was dammed at the outlet to transport logs to the ocean and log storage near the outlet blocked migration. Residential development and recreational boating degraded spawning beaches because stream flows were diverted to prevent flooding and a boat ramp was constructed through the middle of one of the major spawning beaches.14

Habitat Loss and Degradation

Marine species occupy different habitats as they migrate, including the Sockeye's northern Pacific migration near Alaska and many bird species that utilize wetlands located near the shore or even old growth forests. A significant percentage of the Puget Sound Georgia Basin shoreline has been manipulated in some way from its natural, dynamic state. The area where the land meets the sea – or the nearshore – is one of the most productive ecosystem types known in addition to wetlands.

These land-meet-the-sea habitats provide nurseries (similar to the ones you have for your babies) for developing aquatic creatures, shelter for hiding from predators or heat, and places to spawn. In addition, the nearshore habitat protects the shoreline from erosion, filters pollutants from the water and in the case of salt marshes, reduces flooding by retaining stormwater during high-flow periods.15

Nearshore activities that cause habitat degradation include:

  • Bulkheads/armoring
  • Docks and piers
  • Dredging
  • Log rafting
  • Mooring buoys
  • Stairways
  • Lawns

Beach and nearshore environments are dynamic, which means they constantly shift and change, creating and maintaining a diverse array of habitats and food sources. When humans "tidy up" and alter these environments, we dramatically change the course of energy, water, sediments and wind patterns (See the Urbanization and Forest Change Indicator for tips on shoreline ownership and soft armoring techniques).

Chemical Contamination

The Puget Sound Georgia Basin has a long legacy of intensive industrial activities including industrial wastewater discharges, mining, pulp and paper mills, oil refineries, and smelting. In addition, contamination from these sources are excerbated by overall polluted surface runoff, groundwater contamination, and atmospheric deposition of contaminants (pollutants carried by wind or vaporized by incineration and physical degradation of products).16

These chemicals fall into two broad categories:

  • Metals and metal compounds such as arsenic, cadmium, copper, lead, mercury and tributyltin. In the marine environment, metals can act in various ways. Some attach to particles in the water column while others partition directly into bottom sediments. Their effect on resources varies widely with the metal and chemical compound involved. Mercury is of particular interest since it accumulates in long-lived fish and has profound human health effects. TBT has profound effects on oysters.17

    Metals are associated primarily with manufacturing, and can enter the environment through fossil fuel combustion (cars, boats, railroads, farm equipment), use of anti-fouling paints for vessels, disposal of fluorescent lamps and solid waste disposal/sewage sludge application.18

  • Organic Compounds such as polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs); polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), pesticides, dioxins and furans (from chlorine bleaching of pulp); phthalate esters (used in cosmetics and plastics) and polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs; used as flame retardants on computers, furniture, clothing, carpets). These synthetic substances are persistent which means they do not readily degrade, and some bioconcentrate, increasing each successive feeder in the marine food web, including birds. In some cases, they degrade to more toxic compounds.

Marine species that tend to feed off the ocean bottom, such as English sole, are affected by PAHs and fish living in or migrating through industrial bays accumulate heavy metals and other contaminants to a greater degree. Exposure can cause:

    • Immune suppression
    • Endocrine disruption
    • Thinning eggshells
    • Lesions and tumors
    • Reproductive failure
    • Genetic damage19

Resident Northern and Southern Orca Killer Whales are some of the most contaminated marine mammals in the world because they have bioaccumulated these chemical contaminants through the entire food web.43

Over-Harvesting

In the early twentieth century, over harvesting of wildlife (both plants and animals) for food or pelts was the most important threat to wildlife. It was a factor in driving species like the passenger pigeon and the great auk to extinction, and it reduced the numbers of eskimo curlews to such low numbers that they were never able to recover. Today, species such as the right whale, sea otter, aurora trout and american ginseng are either over harvested or are still suffering the after effects of previous over harvesting.

Several species are also threatened by excessive trade. These species are harvested as a food resource and for their pelts. They are also taken from the wild and traded for their medicinal properties, as hunting trophies, as ornamental plants or as pets. Some of the coveted Canadian species are the peregrine falcon, the goldenseal, orchids, sturgeons and bears. This trade is controlled by the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) in Canada and worldwide.20

2002-2004 Updates: Basis for Listing or Designation

  • Cultus Lake Sockeye Salmon (BC): These biologically distinct salmon have been subject to over-fishing from 1952-1997 in which the fishery annually killed an average of 67 percent of the adults before they spawned in the lake (vs. a sustainable level of 56 percent). Since 1995, there has been very high pre-spawn mortality associated with an unusually early migration into freshwater (two months earlier). In addition, because the fish are spending more time in freshwater environments due to earlier migration to Cultus Lake, the parasite parvicapsula, normally present in these waters, is having a disproportionate impact on mortality.21
  • Sakinaw Lake Sockeye Salmon (BC): Between 1991 and 2002 there was an 87 percent reduction in returning salmon to Sakinaw Lake, with a 99 percent reduction over three generations (12 years). This decline is associated with overfishing that continued despite observed declines since 1987, spawning beaches degraded by historic logging, milling and booming, damming of the outlet and boat ramp construction through the middle of a major spawning beach.22
  • Northern and Southern Resident Killer Whales: Seasonally, both resident pods are exposed to high levels of chemical contaminants through their food web. Loss of stream and lake habitat for salmon, the primary food source for resident Killer Whales, has been rapidly declining with development and polluted runoff. Food web contamination appears to be worse in Puget Sound than the Georgia Basin. Resident Puget Sound Chinook salmon have 40 nanograms/gram of PCBs in their fat as opposed to 5 ng/g in Coastal BC, or three times higher than BC. Toxic chemical concentrations in Killer Whales and contamination of food sources have been compounded by excessive boat traffic and other acoustical interruptions from military testing.23
  • Bocaccio: Bocaccio are being caught accidentally by commercial trawlers fishing for other species. A bocaccio's swim bladder cannot accommodate the rapid change in pressure as it is brought to the surface, and most die. Other reasons for population decline come from natural predators such as harbour seals and northern elephant seals. Young bocaccio are prey for seabirds.24
  • Steller Sea Lion: There are only three breeding locations in British Columbia. Although the population is increasing, they are sensitive to human disturbance while on land. They are listed because of the continuing threats including the possibility of acute oil spills. There are unexplained declines in other populations to the north and west of British Columbia. Steller sea lions have in the past been shot. Other causes of decline include incidental take in fishing gear, entanglement in debris, catastrophic accidents, environmental contaminants, and displacement or degradation of their habitat. They are also susceptible to fluctuating prey populations, predation by killer whales, and disease.25
  • Grey Whale – Northeast Pacific population: The principle threat to the eastern North Pacific population of grey whales probably lies in increased human activity in the breeding lagoons. Certain lagoons or parts of lagoons have already become unsuitable because of boat traffic and salt extraction, and any continuation of this trend could eventually put the entire population at risk. Other causes of population decline are increased noise that interferes with migration, increased boat traffic in feeding areas and migration paths causing increased boat strikes, entanglement in fishing gear and toxics in the sediments of feeding areas.26
  • Harbour Porpoise – Pacific Ocean population: Incidental mortality in a number of fisheries in British Columbia has been documented, particularly in gillnet fisheries. The estimated number killed in salmon gillnets in southern British Columbia was <100 individuals in 2001. Harbour porpoises are known to be susceptible to disturbance by vessel traffic and loud underwater sound sources, such as acoustic harassment devices associated with aquaculture operations. Natural sources of mortality in the province include predation by sharks or killer whales.27



Previous
What is happening?

Next
How does this affect me?

 

Marine Species at Risk Resources and Downloads

Species at Risk in the Puget Sound - Georgia Basin Ecosystem View Map View Data Download PDF
Species at Risk in the Puget Sound - Georgia Basin Ecosystem as a Percentage of Native Breeding Species View Graph View Data Download PDF

 

 
Begin Site Footer

EPA Home | Privacy and Security Notice | Contact Us