IMPORTANT NOTICE – Please Read
Beginning October 1, 2015, this website will undergo improvements. During this time, access to some information may not be immediately available. For assistance locating information, please contact the Community Involvement Coordinator listed below in the "Contacts" section of this page. Thank you for your patience as we work to improve your access to site information.
EPA Region 3 (Mid-Atlantic)
EPA ID# MDD980691588
6th Congressional District
Last Update: January 2015
Current Site Status
The construction for this site is complete. The EPA issued its final cleanup decision, called a Record of Decision (ROD), for the site in June of 1996. The ROD called for the installation of a water line to service the residential area currently and potentially impacted by the site. Groundwater and surface water will continue to be monitored and both landfill properties will have restricted future use. Allegany County, Maryland began construction of the water line in August of 1999. The water line construction was completed in September of 1999. All 18 homes that were threatened by groundwater contamination have been placed on a county water line and are no longer using their private wells for potable purposes. EPA completed a Five-Year Review in January 2011 and the next Five-Year Review is scheduled for completion in January 2016. The Site remedy is protective of human health and the environment in the short-term because of the remedial actions selected. The remedy also appears to be protective of the environment because the stream supports macroinvertibrates that are indicative of moderately clean water.
The Limestone Road Site in Cumberland, 'Allegany County, Maryland includes two separate parcels of land on opposite sides of Limestone Road. Both properties were used for the disposal of commercial, residential, and demolition waste during the 1960's and 1970's. In 1981, approximately 110 tons of waste sludge containing chromium, lead, and cadmium were illegally dumped on both properties. In June of 1981, following an initial investigation by the State of Maryland, the property owners were ordered to clean up their respective properties. This order was eventually stayed when the EPA took over the lead at the site in 1982. Area residents had relied on ground water as a drinking water source. A stream which runs by the properties has also been shown to contain metals associated with the site.
- Site Responsibility
- Cleanup of this site is the responsibility of federal and state governments, and parties potentially responsible for site contamination.
- NPL Listing History
- This site was proposed to the National Priorities List of the most serious uncontrolled or abandoned hazardous waste sites requiring long term remedial action on December 30, 1982. The site was formally added to the list September 8, 1983, making it eligible for federal cleanup.
Threats and ContaminantsInorganic chemicals and heavy metals including zinc and lead were detected in on-site soils during test pit sampling. The surface water is contaminated with chromium, cadmium, and zinc. Site and residential wells have been found to contain manganese and nickel. Possible health threats include direct contact with, or accidental swallowing of, contaminated soil or surface water, or prolonged drinking of contaminated ground water.
Contaminant descriptions and risk factors are available from the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, an arm of the CDC.
EPA issued an interim ROD to address the immediate threats posed by the site in 1986. The ROD called for the capping and fencing of the landfill areas of both properties, as well as additional investigations to study the groundwater and streams which run by the properties. All potentially impacted residences with wells are now served by a new water line that was constructed under an Administrative Order on Consent with the Potentially Responsible Parties. EPA completed a Five-Year Review in January 2011 and the next Five-Year Review is scheduled for completion in January 2016. The Site remedy is protective of human health and the environment in the short-term because of the remedial actions selected. The remedy also appears to be protective of the environment because the stream supports macroinvertibrates that are indicative of moderately clean water.